If there's a genuine yearning within you, don't let any groups beliefs impede you, and strive to seek it out. Don't settle for any belief. Learn how to engage into the dialectic, how to apply retroduction and apophasis, synthesis, recollection, and spontaneous thought genesis.
We can't produce anything that has a function without thought of how that function should be built and how it will perform. The human body alone has multiple parts that perform many complex functions that we could not design nor reproduce without any understanding of how they work, yet we gloss over the intricacies and its design and explain it away with one magic word "Evolution"
Exactly!! The belief that the blind, mindless, ultimately meaningless, accidental arrangement of the magical cosmic tea leaves at the bottom of the atheists morning cup of tea accidentally created everything is a fairy tale for adults who are afraid of the light!! "Atheism is a fairy tale for those afraid of the light" - (Dr. John Lennox Professor of Mathematics at Oxford University (emeritus). It’s a fairytale for those afraid of ultimate goodness and ultimate justice in the universe - isn’t it? It’s just so obvious. I mean, maybe there are few confused sceptics but why OUGHT we do anything or believe that anything has “MEANING” in a pitiless, merciless, ultimately meaningless universe where we are all nothing more substantive than ultimately meaningless, hollow and soulless apes who share half their DNA with a potato and just “DANCE TO OUR DNA” - right? My search continues for an intellectually honest strictly reductive materialist, atheist or philosophical naturalist who can give a cohesive, logically consistent, objective foundation HOW THEY KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL IS OBJECTIVELY “TRUE” OR “FALSE” IN AN ULTIMATELY MEANINGLESS AND ULTIMATELY POINTLESS UNIVERSE!! I’ll wait!!
oh, so the reason derived homologies are better than homoplasies and ancestral phylogeny is because of Carlyle's "inarticulate Bible"... that great dust heap called "History" - Birrell, 1884
beliefs are frameworks of possibility. constructive language is how we can navagate these frameworks of possibility. deconstuctive language tears down possibility. truth is infinite if using constuctive language thats my opinion.
i think what he is saying is obvious. i think evolution does damage theism, but barely anybody actually claims there is a strict contradiction between evolution and theism.
"There is grandeur in this view of life...whether originally breathed into a few forms or one" Darwin couldn't care less what others think of his theory. But NO ONE can dispute his appropriating "a few forms or one" from the two origins in Genesis: the 7 day & Adamic. "The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble( meaning unsolvable)" 165 years later NOTHING has challenged WHATSOEVER the absolute failure to explain life coming from inanImacy. "Origin of life science is a SCAM" Lord high executioner of abiogenesis Lee Cronin--- th-cam.com/video/vWjEb7Z1k18/w-d-xo.html Evolution is beautiful even if stolen: "3rd day plant seed"---"5th day marine life...followed by birds" "6th day terrestrial life....followed by humans" HTF is that NOT "descent with modification"?!? The mechanism is unstated...but SO WAS IT FOR DARWIN. Darwin NEVER knew the property of inheritance; genes. It trammeled his hypothesis NOT AT ALL
If magic is possible then magic may occur. Yes, we all know that, but the exploration of that idea with someone who does not believe in magic and (obviously) does not believe that it has occurred does not make for an interesting or useful episode of CTT.
“Cognitive dissonance” Oh the irony!! Listening to militant atheists unwittingly pontificating about metaphysical realities such as ultimate “TRUTH” and “VALUE” and preaching about “COGNITIVE DISSONANCE” whilst subscribing to the belief that we are all nothing more substantive than ULTIMATELY MEANINGLESS, ULTIMATELY DETERMINED, HOLLOW AND SOULLESS APES WHO SHARE HALF THEIR DNA WITH A POTATO IS PRICELESS!! I rest my case!!
U^ェ^U Consciousness is the particle and wave double slit experiment. The cones and rods of your eyes preserve the particle and wave duality so your vision don't look like a flat screen television. It's supposed to be a violation of physics but it is the only exception in the whole universe.
Accepting current theories, verified through experimentation, regarding the beginning and evolution of the universe as correct, all things must be accounted for through various natural processes. Quantum, atomic, molecular and systemic up to and including natural selection and us. That the universe is extremely conducive for all the realities we see today is incontrovertible. If we hadn't developed on Earth, presumably other self-aware beings would have and might have developed elsewhere. What is currently unknown and perhaps unknowable is what was the nature of the state was before the Big Bang that allowed for our universe. I don't see why a possible explanation is that "God" was the state before the Big Bang. "God" allowed for it and established the many parameters that allowed for the universe and us, that exist today. We were not a sure thing and to assume that the tilt of the Moon allowing for seasons and evolution allowing for us, are "God's" handiwork, is a step too far for me. If it hadn't't happened here, presumably in a vast universe it would have happened elsewhere, and maybe did. "God" is as good a postulation for all things than any other. If some gain emotional support (me included) from concluding that, where's the harm? If organized religion is largely negative, it's because it's a human invention, subject to all the human frailaties. This gent sums up my feeling exactly and to all who denigrate him or his comments, why watch this channel if you're not open to all ideas?
Evolution and religion can co-exist by each ignoring the other. That can only happen if governments make policies based on facts. In which case medical policy would incorporate some evolutionary theory and zero religion. And as long as that happens anyone can believe anything they want without hurting society. Aside from that, all these people are talking about is purely hypothetical and aside from being a thought experiment this discussion is not of any value.
God takes a minute speaks but there gotta be A creator That's only love you mr Robert/Most love his loss but gain others and god told me love people and love yourself he also told me my children is his children but we are one they come from the father not me He made the universe,love, kindness,pain,good or evil ) heart of mind of female or male God came travel though universe speed of light without anybody knowing he cwn also become human too if the person connected too the God resources He can be male or female cause God is good and evil He just don't like people do all evil )I give my love like God give his love
~>゜)ーーー We need to popularize the idea of getting God married. Getting God married is a good use of someone's time. You are supposed to make the environment intelligent so no God is needed. We fixed the video and audio for the best experience possible. Cameras are supernatural and all of them captured 3D that not a gimmick. The audio loud don't make violence so has depth. Nobody has to buy anything for it to work.
Because of the hiddenness of God evolution doesn't have an effect on spiritual matters. God didn't sit around for billions of years waiting for everything to unfold.
(^_^) Natural selection is the character flaw in evil that is integrity is more important than life otherwise evolution is tragic circumstances with nothing intelligent happening. Almost everyone survive until they reproduce. Nothing is getting selected except for the character flaw in evil. I found a replacement for the character flaw in evil that I liked but God makes me forget things that will cause me trouble.
( ＾ω＾ ) This is an artistic proof of a created universe. When you paint a shadow it's the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it. Pigments have different rules than light. It took them thousands of years to get all the pigments they have now.
Evolutionary ‘saltation’ (also called punctuated equilibrium: seemingly massive functional leaps without intermediate fossil traces leading one to suggest that evolution is punctuated rather than smooth) might be laid at the foot of the interventionist theorist. I’m an atheist but I find Dawkins a bore, not at all a great philosophical mind. Dennett, a fine philosopher, but en thrall to a radical reading of Darwin according to which: no adaptive change without natural selection. There’s a wonderful exchange of papers between Elliot Sober and Karen Neander on the precise nature, scope and formulation of evolutionary explanation based on Darwinian (better: neo-Darwinian) principles. The initial claims made by Sober are so philosophically or logically unadventurous (not Sober’s) fault that he should need to be defending them. But thanks to the likes of Dawkins (radical wing of Darwinism!), not a logician or philosopher, Sober finds himself having point out these near platitudes.
Not sure why we can't just call evolution, Evolution. No need to bring up Darwin, evolution has far surpassed his understanding of evolution, though he has greatly contributed to the base of the theory.
@ The basis remains essentially Darwinian. Omitting that fact might encourage a resurgence in, say Lamarckism. It would be premature indeed to pass Darwin off to the sidelines.
@RalphBrooker-gn9iv People in the field wouldn't somehow invest into Lamarckism because they understand the processes and principles of evolution. Just like physics doesn't say Newton's law/theory of gravity, they are just called Law of Gravity and the theory of gravity. Sorry had to make sure I was correct (general relativity is Einstein) anyway the only thing that the labeling evolution as Darwinian or neo Darwin is give fuel to creationist...
@RalphBrooker-gn9iv Also, Darwin wasn't the only one at that time to realize that life on Earth had common ancestry and changed over time. Alfred Russel Wallace, for one did as well. He was half way around the world studying beatles when Darwin was formulating the theory and Darwin only published when he did as a result of Wallace correspondence.
Why? "String Theory proponents" don't say it is a proven theory. They say profusely, that "String Theory" equations produces an amount of dimension that are inconsistent with the observable world that we live in. "Multiverse" "proponents" specifically say, don't claim it's a theory; as a matter of fact they specifically and consistently say, that the mathematical proposition is "untestable". "Multiverse" is a by-product that pops out of the equations of "Inflation". Kuhn understands this all too well.
@ that’s a contradiction in terms my friend. If the Bible is inspired by God as it claims then the men are effectively acting as secretaries being dictated to which means there are no errors in the Bible. This is an argument or proposition often trotted out. And let us suppose for a moment that with copying of the Bible over millennia and centuries some errors have crept in those errors have been captured and corrected because we have literally thousands of manuscripts from which the Bible cannon has been derived. So the core proposition of the Bible, the moral tenants prophecy historical references mankind‘s meaning and purpose and more importantly, God purpose for this creation remains unblemished and intact.
@@Cafez27...being divinely inspired does not equate to GOD writing the book for the book to be perfect... again, the book was not written by GOD but written by humans who can err.... relying totally on a book written by men, without using your good senses, makes you vulnerable to the imperfections of men...
@TonyJack74 Yes, some "theists" are so uninformed, uncertain and confused about the existence of God that they try to lean on evolution theory as an escape route. The Bible clearly says that God created every living thing according to its kind. (Genesis 1:21) It does not say that one kind of living thing was made to change into another. And there is no evidence, whatsoever, to prove that any particular kind of living thing changed to another kind. There is zero fossil record for that. Even viruses mutate and still remain viruses. No one has ever seen a virus change to a bacterium or other single or multicellular organisms. Evolution lacks concrete evidence. It is nothing but empty talks. There is not one successful evolution experiment to prove their claim.
You're dependence and adherence to a book written over 1500 years with wildly conflicting agendas,flawed and often contradictory theology,different creation accounts,etc is vacuous
There's too many men, too many people Making too many problems And not much love to go round Can't you see this is a land of confusion? - Genesis (the band)
"Philosophy of Religion" Religion started when stone-age people believed in the Almighty Creator by just witnessing the Awesome Wonders of Nature... and because of their faith, many of them received the heavenly light that made them understand GOD better.... they then share this light to their descendants .. .. the sharing of this light went on and on from generations to generations that finally were written on tablets, scrolls, bibles, etc.. being interpreted in many different ways due to the writer's language handicap in ancient times... ...the passage of this light from generations to generations being interpreted, or misinterpreted, had led to the development of many religions from all over the world ... this is why you have genesis, bible, koran, torah, etc etc... ... I believe I received the same light because of my sincere faith, but fortunate enough that I have enough available words today to interpret and convey this light much better, unlike ancient writers whose literacy was still in its infancy... this is why you find my interpretation somehow different but has many things in common with what you read from religious books.... ..nevertheless, it is your sincere faith in the existence of a Loving GOD that matters that can save your soul, and not how imperfect men interpreted the unknown GOD through the light they received...
Physics uncertainty principle and genetic mutations in evolution are sufficient to argue against evolution as causally complete.
I understand brother but who knows; maybe God’s purpose is love.
@@Ekam-SatYes I think maybe so as well. I was just following the coherence of the argument which was left hanging in mid air.
@@skippdiddly1409 🙏
If there's a genuine yearning within you, don't let any groups beliefs impede you, and strive to seek it out. Don't settle for any belief. Learn how to engage into the dialectic, how to apply retroduction and apophasis, synthesis, recollection, and spontaneous thought genesis.
🙏
We can't produce anything that has a function without thought of how that function should be built and how it will perform. The human body alone has multiple parts that perform many complex functions that we could not design nor reproduce without any understanding of how they work, yet we gloss over the intricacies and its design and explain it away with one magic word "Evolution"
Exactly!!
The belief that the blind, mindless, ultimately meaningless, accidental arrangement of the magical cosmic tea leaves at the bottom of the atheists morning cup of tea accidentally created everything is a fairy tale for adults who are afraid of the light!!
"Atheism is a fairy tale for those afraid of the light" - (Dr. John Lennox Professor of Mathematics at Oxford University (emeritus).
It’s a fairytale for those afraid of ultimate goodness and ultimate justice in the universe - isn’t it? It’s just so obvious.
I mean, maybe there are few confused sceptics but why OUGHT we do anything or believe that anything has “MEANING” in a pitiless, merciless, ultimately meaningless universe where we are all nothing more substantive than ultimately meaningless, hollow and soulless apes who share half their DNA with a potato and just “DANCE TO OUR DNA” - right?
My search continues for an intellectually honest strictly reductive materialist, atheist or philosophical naturalist who can give a cohesive, logically consistent, objective foundation HOW THEY KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL IS OBJECTIVELY “TRUE” OR “FALSE” IN AN ULTIMATELY MEANINGLESS AND ULTIMATELY POINTLESS UNIVERSE!! I’ll wait!!
Or use the word ‘adaptation’ as a broadly defined way to explain what otherwise appears to be goal-directed processes.
oh, so the reason derived homologies are better than homoplasies and ancestral phylogeny is because of Carlyle's "inarticulate Bible"... that great dust heap called "History" - Birrell, 1884
Yeah baby.
Mr. Sober presented a very weak case. There's a possibility of a god's intervention in the evolution but, he does not know exactly what is it.
... the natural laws that God designed to govern this Physical Universe is not Evolution....
De primal purpose of GOD IS LOVE.
The Prof Sober is not a twist in my sobriety.
I love that song.
We were created by God & have evolved over billions of years! My opinion only.
...only the physical brain and body were created by GOD but not our free aware immortal souls who are free splits of the Holy Spirit...
Depends on what you mean by evolution, and whether you believe the veracity of the bibles creation account
Any opinion should be welcomed 😊 thank you for sharing!
@ that’s a claim unsupported by scripture I’m afraid
@@lipan315 indeed it should
beliefs are frameworks of possibility. constructive language is how we can navagate these frameworks of possibility. deconstuctive language tears down possibility. truth is infinite if using constuctive language thats my opinion.
i think what he is saying is obvious. i think evolution does damage theism, but barely anybody actually claims there is a strict contradiction between evolution and theism.
A very SIMPLE argument is: evolution is a process of "god" being the whole process.
....why would an Almighty Creator wait for billions of yrs of evolution just to create an amoeba ?.. your theory can be considered as Blasphemy..
@@evaadam3635 the "Almighty" is also the Alpatient One. Besides, he has countless other Universes to deal with. lol
@@edwardtutman196 ...why create many universes when GOD can just add another galaxy in this one universe ? .. you are not making any sense....
"There is grandeur in this view of life...whether originally breathed into a few forms or one"
Darwin couldn't care less what others think of his theory. But NO ONE can dispute his
appropriating "a few forms or one" from the two origins in Genesis: the 7 day & Adamic.
"The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble( meaning unsolvable)"
165 years later NOTHING has challenged WHATSOEVER the absolute failure to explain
life coming from inanImacy. "Origin of life science is a SCAM" Lord high executioner of
abiogenesis Lee Cronin--- th-cam.com/video/vWjEb7Z1k18/w-d-xo.html
Evolution is beautiful even if stolen:
"3rd day plant seed"---"5th day marine life...followed by birds" "6th day terrestrial life....followed by humans"
HTF is that NOT "descent with modification"?!? The mechanism is unstated...but SO WAS IT FOR DARWIN.
Darwin NEVER knew the property of inheritance; genes. It trammeled his hypothesis NOT AT ALL
Maybe the creator desired not to be alone.
If magic is possible then magic may occur.
Yes, we all know that, but the exploration of that idea with someone who does not believe in magic and (obviously) does not believe that it has occurred does not make for an interesting or useful episode of CTT.
Lame!!
CRINGE ATHEISM in full effect!
Militant atheism is a walking ball of self contradiction and cognitive dissonance!!
Accommodation: a euphemism for cognitive dissonance without wanting to come across as an ignoramus
“Cognitive dissonance”
Oh the irony!! Listening to militant atheists unwittingly pontificating about metaphysical realities such as ultimate “TRUTH” and “VALUE” and preaching about “COGNITIVE DISSONANCE” whilst subscribing to the belief that we are all nothing more substantive than ULTIMATELY MEANINGLESS, ULTIMATELY DETERMINED, HOLLOW AND SOULLESS APES WHO SHARE HALF THEIR DNA WITH A POTATO IS PRICELESS!!
I rest my case!!
U^ェ^U Consciousness is the particle and wave double slit experiment. The cones and rods of your eyes preserve the particle and wave duality so your vision don't look like a flat screen television. It's supposed to be a violation of physics but it is the only exception in the whole universe.
Accepting current theories, verified through experimentation, regarding the beginning and evolution of the universe as correct, all things must be accounted for through various natural processes. Quantum, atomic, molecular and systemic up to and including natural selection and us. That the universe is extremely conducive for all the realities we see today is incontrovertible. If we hadn't developed on Earth, presumably other self-aware beings would have and might have developed elsewhere. What is currently unknown and perhaps unknowable is what was the nature of the state was before the Big Bang that allowed for our universe. I don't see why a possible explanation is that "God" was the state before the Big Bang. "God" allowed for it and established the many parameters that allowed for the universe and us, that exist today. We were not a sure thing and to assume that the tilt of the Moon allowing for seasons and evolution allowing for us, are "God's" handiwork, is a step too far for me. If it hadn't't happened here, presumably in a vast universe it would have happened elsewhere, and maybe did. "God" is as good a postulation for all things than any other. If some gain emotional support (me included) from concluding that, where's the harm? If organized religion is largely negative, it's because it's a human invention, subject to all the human frailaties. This gent sums up my feeling exactly and to all who denigrate him or his comments, why watch this channel if you're not open to all ideas?
Evolution and religion can co-exist by each ignoring the other. That can only happen if governments make policies based on facts. In which case medical policy would incorporate some evolutionary theory and zero religion. And as long as that happens anyone can believe anything they want without hurting society.
Aside from that, all these people are talking about is purely hypothetical and aside from being a thought experiment this discussion is not of any value.
Prophecing to be wise they became fools
... good point... prophecing to be science geniuses they became worshippers of Darwin's IGUANA as their Original Mama looking funny fools...
🙏
God takes a minute speaks but there gotta be A creator That's only love you mr Robert/Most love his loss but gain others and god told me love people and love yourself he also told me my children is his children but we are one they come from the father not me He made the universe,love, kindness,pain,good or evil ) heart of mind of female or male God came travel though universe speed of light without anybody knowing he cwn also become human too if the person connected too the God resources He can be male or female cause God is good and evil He just don't like people do all evil )I give my love like God give his love
~>゜)ーーー We need to popularize the idea of getting God married. Getting God married is a good use of someone's time. You are supposed to make the environment intelligent so no God is needed. We fixed the video and audio for the best experience possible. Cameras are supernatural and all of them captured 3D that not a gimmick. The audio loud don't make violence so has depth. Nobody has to buy anything for it to work.
Rob enjoying yo free speech 😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂
(*^^*) The human body is burly, gnarly and surly like a fractal.
If you put anything out there as an argument I.e. God vs No God and it becomes public domain nonsense.
😂😂😂😂😂
Because of the hiddenness of God evolution doesn't have an effect on spiritual matters.
God didn't sit around for billions of years waiting for everything to unfold.
(^_^) Natural selection is the character flaw in evil that is integrity is more important than life otherwise evolution is tragic circumstances with nothing intelligent happening. Almost everyone survive until they reproduce. Nothing is getting selected except for the character flaw in evil. I found a replacement for the character flaw in evil that I liked but God makes me forget things that will cause me trouble.
If we agree that living beings have souls, then we can say that soul may be the agency of evolution.
I don't agree that souls exist.
@@user-gk9lg5sp4y Souls are the scientific and philosophical necessity
Beings don’t have souls according to the bible, they ARE souls
@@Cafez27 Soul with a body
@ not quite my friend the body is a soul, there isn’t anything separate from the body…..
( ＾ω＾ ) This is an artistic proof of a created universe. When you paint a shadow it's the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it. Pigments have different rules than light. It took them thousands of years to get all the pigments they have now.
Evolutionary ‘saltation’ (also called punctuated equilibrium: seemingly massive functional leaps without intermediate fossil traces leading one to suggest that evolution is punctuated rather than smooth) might be laid at the foot of the interventionist theorist.
I’m an atheist but I find Dawkins a bore, not at all a great philosophical mind. Dennett, a fine philosopher, but en thrall to a radical reading of Darwin according to which: no adaptive change without natural selection.
There’s a wonderful exchange of papers between Elliot Sober and Karen Neander on the precise nature, scope and formulation of evolutionary explanation based on Darwinian (better: neo-Darwinian) principles.
The initial claims made by Sober are so philosophically or logically unadventurous (not Sober’s) fault that he should need to be defending them. But thanks to the likes of Dawkins (radical wing of Darwinism!), not a logician or philosopher, Sober finds himself having point out these near platitudes.
Not sure why we can't just call evolution, Evolution. No need to bring up Darwin, evolution has far surpassed his understanding of evolution, though he has greatly contributed to the base of the theory.
@ The basis remains essentially Darwinian. Omitting that fact might encourage a resurgence in, say Lamarckism. It would be premature indeed to pass Darwin off to the sidelines.
@RalphBrooker-gn9iv People in the field wouldn't somehow invest into Lamarckism because they understand the processes and principles of evolution. Just like physics doesn't say Newton's law/theory of gravity, they are just called Law of Gravity and the theory of gravity. Sorry had to make sure I was correct (general relativity is Einstein) anyway the only thing that the labeling evolution as Darwinian or neo Darwin is give fuel to creationist...
@@RalphBrooker-gn9ivDarwin would need years of study to even understand where his theory is currently.
@RalphBrooker-gn9iv Also, Darwin wasn't the only one at that time to realize that life on Earth had common ancestry and changed over time.
Alfred Russel Wallace, for one did as well. He was half way around the world studying beatles when Darwin was formulating the theory and Darwin only published when he did as a result of Wallace correspondence.
I wish Kuhn would go after the Multiverse and String Theory proponents with equal zeal.
Why?
"String Theory proponents" don't say it is a proven theory.
They say profusely, that "String Theory" equations produces an amount of dimension that are inconsistent with the observable world that we live in.
"Multiverse" "proponents" specifically say, don't claim it's a theory; as a matter of fact they specifically and consistently say, that the mathematical proposition is "untestable".
"Multiverse" is a by-product that pops out of the equations of "Inflation".
Kuhn understands this all too well.
O 😅😂😂😂😂😅😅😅
The bible makes it super clear at an understandable level how the universe and earth and all life on earth came about
...there are great values written in the bible but it is still a book written by men who were humans who can err, divinely inspired or not...
@ that’s a contradiction in terms my friend. If the Bible is inspired by God as it claims then the men are effectively acting as secretaries being dictated to which means there are no errors in the Bible.
This is an argument or proposition often trotted out. And let us suppose for a moment that with copying of the Bible over millennia and centuries some errors have crept in those errors have been captured and corrected because we have literally thousands of manuscripts from which the Bible cannon has been derived.
So the core proposition of the Bible, the moral tenants prophecy historical references mankind‘s meaning and purpose and more importantly, God purpose for this creation remains unblemished and intact.
@@Cafez27...being divinely inspired does not equate to GOD writing the book for the book to be perfect... again, the book was not written by GOD but written by humans who can err.... relying totally on a book written by men, without using your good senses, makes you vulnerable to the imperfections of men...
Right but we have the intelligence to connect the dots.
@ connect what dots?
Barely 35 seconds in and this guy is already trotting out the Nazis. Snore.
p(^^)q It's intelligently designed that if you master evolution it just makes you a baby doctor.
Here comes the Atheist 😂
What do evolutionists (atheists) think? That God should apologize to them for their self imposed ignorance?
There's many theists that believe in evolution
@TonyJack74 Yes, some "theists" are so uninformed, uncertain and confused about the existence of God that they try to lean on evolution theory as an escape route.
The Bible clearly says that God created every living thing according to its kind. (Genesis 1:21) It does not say that one kind of living thing was made to change into another. And there is no evidence, whatsoever, to prove that any particular kind of living thing changed to another kind. There is zero fossil record for that. Even viruses mutate and still remain viruses. No one has ever seen a virus change to a bacterium or other single or multicellular organisms. Evolution lacks concrete evidence. It is nothing but empty talks. There is not one successful evolution experiment to prove their claim.
One
@@Ekam-Sat I know that's one question but I made it appear like two on purpose?
@@peweegangloku6428 Understood! Thank you for the reply and best wishes for the New Year.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Sobers view is vacuous
You're dependence and adherence to a book written over 1500 years with wildly conflicting agendas,flawed and often contradictory theology,different creation accounts,etc is vacuous
@ well done for making a whole bunch of baseless claims!
You do know that simply stating something doesn’t make it true don’t you 🤦🏼
There's too many men, too many people
Making too many problems
And not much love to go round
Can't you see this is a land of confusion?
- Genesis (the band)
Robert... Why discuss the fake evolutionary theory... It's getting so boring.
So there's a fake evolutionary now?
@@user-gk9lg5sp4y even fossils don't indicate it. I have not seen monkey fossils showing evolution.
Interesting how you lead your life with your head stuck in the sand.
@@johnstaub6278 my head has not seen a single fossil in the sand showing evolution.
"Philosophy of Religion"
Religion started when stone-age people believed in the Almighty Creator by just witnessing the Awesome Wonders of Nature... and because of their faith, many of them received the heavenly light that made them understand GOD better.... they then share this light to their descendants ..
.. the sharing of this light went on and on from generations to generations that finally were written on tablets, scrolls, bibles, etc.. being interpreted in many different ways due to the writer's language handicap in ancient times...
...the passage of this light from generations to generations being interpreted, or misinterpreted, had led to the development of many religions from all over the world ... this is why you have genesis, bible, koran, torah, etc etc...
... I believe I received the same light because of my sincere faith, but fortunate enough that I have enough available words today to interpret and convey this light much better, unlike ancient writers whose literacy was still in its infancy... this is why you find my interpretation somehow different but has many things in common with what you read from religious books....
..nevertheless, it is your sincere faith in the existence of a Loving GOD that matters that can save your soul, and not how imperfect men interpreted the unknown GOD through the light they received...