It'd be cool if you did a new F1 aero video, using footage from Spa. The floor edges, and the piece above the front tires were really moving some water spray!
Why do you do tangency only instead of curvature continuity? And also, why don't you round up the side surface instead of flatting it out with a fill? Super nice video man! Appreciate it
Das neue V6 bringt ja mal einen frischen Wind in den Win95 Look von V5. Bin an der Uni mit NX11 bis 1953 vertraut geworden (der neue Sketcher ist leider für die Tonne). Aber die Konstruktionsmethode ist quasi identisch wie ich so eine Surface in NX machen würde. Schön, einem Pro zuzusehen :) Was mich am meisten an V5 stört ist, wie der Strukturbaum funktioniert: Welche Verbesserungen/Änderungen wurden in V6 implementiert?
Bro, I need your opinion on something, (I was about to sleep with this headache when) I had this realization about the RB19 concept. The sidepod is an (combination of) upside down airfoil(s), and it makes perfect sense because old sidepods (very curvy on top) actually subtract from the cars total downforce in exchange to directing the airfoil to the diffuser and beam-wing. I can actually picture in my head Newey wondering if the ground effect sidepods would work in these regulations and trying it out. It really reminds me of the Göttingen airfoils in particular, but look at the S1020. If you flip the side view of it (upside down), you can see it's got some "bleeding channels" for the higher pressure on top to go down and a gurney flap like structure at the end of it. The highest pressure region (the leading edge) is the sidepod entry which would explain the few losses in cooling. That would explain why teams have many different sidepod shapes but none of them worked so far.
Yeah it's a shame it's not, since CATIA isn't exactly accessible. But the concepts taught are still useful. The main issue with Fusion 360 is the lack of equation curves, so generating the aerofoil profile in the first place is the hardest part. Then to get continuity across surfaces you have to model from surface edges instead of curves, so you would have to split faces to get the edges Martin is creating with curves in CATIA. The equivalent of the Multi-Surface command in Autodesk terms is Loft and in some cases you might use Patch.
Rumors going around that their front wing was flexing too much and the FIA asked them to use a different one. They are bringing a new one that will not flex as much but will hopefully regain the lost performance.
@@BSport320 Naja, da gibts ja schon einige Unterschiede, mal davon abgesehen, dass 3D Experience komplett Server-gestützt ist. Ich kenne keinen, der sich nicht über die Software beschwert. XD
![[UNCUT] “บอสณวัฒน์” ลากไส้!! ใครหนุนหลัง "แม่ตั๊ก ป๋าเบียร์" I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 30 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QlD7mU2KKRk/mqdefault.jpg)
It'd be cool if you did a new F1 aero video, using footage from Spa. The floor edges, and the piece above the front tires were really moving some water spray!
I was thnking the same thing! I was hoping we would be able to get some good shots of the floor edge and other near ground aero working this weekend!
@BSport320 you rock!
Please make more detailed and lengthy videos of the sort, we appreciate your efforts.🙏🏿
nice video! could you maybe explain more detailed what the purpose of these aerodynamic features is?
Like I said, the purpose it to have a small trailing edge at the side because there is a lot of crossflowat the tips.
@@BSport320 i missed that. thanks!
Let’s create illegal downwash to slow down our competitors whilst also optimizing our own aero!
Why do you do tangency only instead of curvature continuity? And also, why don't you round up the side surface instead of flatting it out with a fill? Super nice video man! Appreciate it
Das neue V6 bringt ja mal einen frischen Wind in den Win95 Look von V5. Bin an der Uni mit NX11 bis 1953 vertraut geworden (der neue Sketcher ist leider für die Tonne). Aber die Konstruktionsmethode ist quasi identisch wie ich so eine Surface in NX machen würde. Schön, einem Pro zuzusehen :)
Was mich am meisten an V5 stört ist, wie der Strukturbaum funktioniert: Welche Verbesserungen/Änderungen wurden in V6 implementiert?
Bro, I need your opinion on something, (I was about to sleep with this headache when) I had this realization about the RB19 concept.
The sidepod is an (combination of) upside down airfoil(s), and it makes perfect sense because old sidepods (very curvy on top) actually subtract from the cars total downforce in exchange to directing the airfoil to the diffuser and beam-wing.
I can actually picture in my head Newey wondering if the ground effect sidepods would work in these regulations and trying it out. It really reminds me of the Göttingen airfoils in particular, but look at the S1020.
If you flip the side view of it (upside down), you can see it's got some "bleeding channels" for the higher pressure on top to go down and a gurney flap like structure at the end of it.
The highest pressure region (the leading edge) is the sidepod entry which would explain the few losses in cooling.
That would explain why teams have many different sidepod shapes but none of them worked so far.
Is it possible to do this in Fusion 360?
Yeah it's a shame it's not, since CATIA isn't exactly accessible. But the concepts taught are still useful. The main issue with Fusion 360 is the lack of equation curves, so generating the aerofoil profile in the first place is the hardest part. Then to get continuity across surfaces you have to model from surface edges instead of curves, so you would have to split faces to get the edges Martin is creating with curves in CATIA. The equivalent of the Multi-Surface command in Autodesk terms is Loft and in some cases you might use Patch.
I'm very curious about how aston fell off so steep, yes others got upgrades but so did aston. Any idea why?
Rumors going around that their front wing was flexing too much and the FIA asked them to use a different one. They are bringing a new one that will not flex as much but will hopefully regain the lost performance.
my fav video yet
Irrelevant question. What engine air intake size and form should be? How to calculate the needed crosssection?
This would be good for starting engineering students. They can see where they will be in years to come.
Please make more videos like these. Or catia V6 tutorials on youtube
Wow, love it
Which wing profiles did you use and why ?
Ich bin mit V5 R21groß geworden, als Modellbauer, das sieht wie eine komplett andere Software aus :-D
Sieht nur so aus, ist fast alles gleich :)
Ich musste mich erstmal orientieren, als ich das Dassault Logo gesehen habe, fühlte ich mich gleich wieder heimisch 🤦♂
@@BSport320 Naja, da gibts ja schon einige Unterschiede, mal davon abgesehen, dass 3D Experience komplett Server-gestützt ist. Ich kenne keinen, der sich nicht über die Software beschwert. XD
Are you german?
Please sandbag the Red Bulls.