Nice trick of syllogs . Great idea to connect this topic with accounting part i.e. with income n expenditure. I just like the colorful idea But it is not considering perfect tricks for syllogisms for exm purpose.
I think firstly you need a class on syllogism then after you can deliver the lecture. You don't know anything about syllogism. Firstly attend a class for that then upload any video
Very unique style of teaching 👏 on syllogism. Whole day i was trying to understand syllogism. But don't understand anything. It's a midnight finally found your video.
Thanks for this video. Your extra efforts made me understand the concept better. Even though you said a particular line wrong ' Income can never be greater than expenditure' I still understood the concept because you explained step wise step. Please pin a comment stating ' Expenditure can never be greater than Income '. Though we know loans and credit card are the sweetest poison which solve the problem just fine.
Sir your are great ..since there is no video whole youtube channel ..who clear concept like this 👌 i Researching for 3 hr finally i got most easy video of this concept
I have a doubt. In last question you said that "some trees are plants" is correct conclusion but when a statement repeats in conclusion then that conclusion is considered to be wrong. Please correct if otherwise. Thanks.
This is negative statement & For tree - 50 & for plant -100 Because trees attached witch some like statement & plant start with not like statement In conclusion we consider - ve statement 😊
Thanks sir , I corrected 3 questions in 3 exam's of group a and b and group c exams ,. previously I can't get marks from this topic now I got 3 correct out of 3 with 💯 strick rate thanks 🙏
Hlo sir first of all I would like to thank you for helping us This is the easiest way to get the answer for 3 statement like all, some, no, but wat abt the 4 statement ie some not plz reply. I hope you will do the need ful
You are wrong ... this method is the best ... i have used it always andnit never failed ... better than venn diagram method jo possibility mein confuse ksrta hai ye nhi karta
R.PRABU SARAN i guess u are referring to Q 2 (Sal, Ash and Abishek). The first 3 conclusions are correct and 4th incorrect, per my review too-Sal and Abi are disjointed/have nothing in common so a & b are correct; Ash is part of Abi so c is correct & d is wrong.
1st question intelligent has different values which means no direct relationship of two statements,still u solved.in last question u solved in different manner.u learn and then taech
If any of the values is 100 then we can solve it.. As per your doubt, statement (a) has 50 as it's value on intelligent And statement (b) has 100 as it's value on intelligent Here, any one should be 100, and so it is. Or both as 100. That's how sum is solved.
Sorry sir When statement are repeated as same in conclusion then it is taken as false. But according to ur last question ur accept as true Plz check it as soon as possible. Thank u
This is an explanation for all those who are asking how to apply +ve -ve rule on problems with more than 2 statements: Let's say we have a problem with 3 statements. now firstly we check the 1st conclusion is valid or not. Now this 1st conclusion will be either negative or positive and it contains two elements. now this two elements are either from one statement or maximum two statements. now our first conclusion is say positive and two elements of it are from two different statements. Now we apply the +ve -ve rule on those two statements 1) if the outcome is positive then we can proceed further and check with income expense method. If the conclusion satisfys income expense method then it is valid . 2) if the outcome is negative then the conclusion is invalid even if it satisfys the income expense method(we assumed that the 1st conclusion is positive) . Apply the same procedure for all other conclusions.
@@durgabhavani5869 2 కంటే ఎక్కువ స్టేట్మెంట్లతో సమస్యలపై +ve -ve నియమాన్ని ఎలా వర్తింపజేయాలి అని అడుగుతున్న వారందరికీ ఇది వివరణ: మనకు 3 స్టేట్మెంట్లతో సమస్య ఉందని అనుకుందాం. ఇప్పుడు మొదట మేము 1వ ముగింపు చెల్లుబాటులో ఉందో లేదో తనిఖీ చేస్తాము. ఇప్పుడు ఈ 1వ ముగింపు ప్రతికూలంగా లేదా సానుకూలంగా ఉంటుంది మరియు ఇది రెండు అంశాలను కలిగి ఉంటుంది. ఇప్పుడు ఈ రెండు అంశాలు ఒక స్టేట్మెంట్ లేదా గరిష్టంగా రెండు స్టేట్మెంట్ల నుండి ఉన్నాయి. ఇప్పుడు మా మొదటి ముగింపు సానుకూలంగా చెప్పబడింది మరియు దానిలోని రెండు అంశాలు రెండు వేర్వేరు ప్రకటనల నుండి వచ్చాయి. ఇప్పుడు మేము ఆ రెండు స్టేట్మెంట్లపై +ve -ve నియమాన్ని వర్తింపజేస్తాము 1) ఫలితం సానుకూలంగా ఉంటే, మేము మరింత ముందుకు సాగవచ్చు మరియు ఆదాయ వ్యయ పద్ధతిని తనిఖీ చేయవచ్చు. ముగింపు ఆదాయ వ్యయ పద్ధతిని సంతృప్తిపరిచినట్లయితే, అది చెల్లుబాటు అవుతుంది. 2) ఫలితం ప్రతికూలంగా ఉంటే, అది ఆదాయ వ్యయ పద్ధతిని సంతృప్తిపరిచినప్పటికీ ముగింపు చెల్లదు (1వ ముగింపు సానుకూలంగా ఉందని మేము భావించాము) . అన్ని ఇతర ముగింపుల కోసం అదే విధానాన్ని వర్తించండి.
I want to ask If there are 2 statements : All soldiers must be healthy Some soldiers are 70 kg weight What are the conclusions can you give for me? More than 1 of course
Ur teaching method is amazing Sir But joh last question m conclusion no (b) nd (d) wrong hoga bcoz conclusion m same statement given hota h toh voh wrong hota h 😊 For bank SSC Railway only:Repeat statement in conclusion is wrong
In 4th example(viz. plants & herbs) u have used same statements as premises and as well as conclusions.Stmt-a=concln-d and stmt-b=concln-b. So there's no need to apply any rule to derive conclusions.
I think that you have taught wrong Because no salman is abhishekh and no abhishekh is salman will be right but you said that the statement is wrong Again clear it
Confused moredan Rahul Gandhi in 2nd question he said statement a) _ve b)+ve he should apply rule num 2 according to coclusion 1 ) but he said apply rule num 3 😁😁
great explanation.... in one statement he is saying income can not be greater than expense and in other he says as income is less than expense so statement is wrong.
YOUR TRICKS IS 100% WORK ON EVERY QUESTIONS .............................................................. I SOLVED 100 QUESTIONS AND THIS TRICK WORKS ON APPROX 67 QUESTIONS
Income should always be greater than expenditure...is the right sentence...man u just made me watch twice ..
Exactly..
Yeah, I was confused as to what he was saying
😂
Egjactlyyy😭😭
Yeah bro i was like are u arts student😂
What a great a way to confuse the students ..hats off sir ...👏👏👏🔥
Right
😂😂
I can't control myself 😂😂😂
Yup
Exactly !! 😭😬😂
Nice trick of syllogs . Great idea to connect this topic with accounting part i.e. with income n expenditure.
I just like the colorful idea
But it is not considering perfect tricks for syllogisms for exm purpose.
You are teaching very easy questions which will not come in exams
Right
th-cam.com/video/YowvIf0B29E/w-d-xo.html ah dkh skde a tuc
once you told income cannot be greater than exp and gain ur saying it should be greater than.clarify that part
he pronounced it in the wrong way .. it should income cannot be less than expenditure..
thank you
Mira Guru yes, but all over the videos is good
Exactly what a fool to waste effort.
divya behata correct
I think firstly you need a class on syllogism then after you can deliver the lecture. You don't know anything about syllogism. Firstly attend a class for that then upload any video
true
Hey Abhishek I think You don't know Anything About Syllogism.
@@reddemon2183 u need to learn more about syllogism.
Hm.. Maybe, that's why he got 1.2 million views.... #dumb
Restatement never follows in conclusion
Very unique style of teaching 👏 on syllogism. Whole day i was trying to understand syllogism. But don't understand anything. It's a midnight finally found your video.
in 2nd question one statement is +ve one is -ve then there should be -ve conclusion ....u are making confuse
This helped me a lot, I have solved almost all of my questions with this trick. Such an easy trick.
From Morning I'm struggling with syllogism. But now it has become a cake walk. A warm thank you sir
I know this because I was seeing you from outside
Solve Full Chapter in Seconds ..
Thanks alot sir ❤️
Thanks for this video. Your extra efforts made me understand the concept better. Even though you said a particular line wrong
' Income can never be greater than expenditure'
I still understood the concept because you explained step wise step.
Please pin a comment stating ' Expenditure can never be greater than Income '.
Though we know loans and credit card are the sweetest poison which solve the problem just fine.
It's almost 7 years to this still so useful, I wish I could go back then in time and relive all these years again having my present conciousness
Have you clear your exam
@@Iamvengance191😂.
3:10 its expediture can not be greater than income
Nice point
This is what I needed all over youtube
Outstanding trick......😊😊🤩🤩
Best Lesson on Syllogism..
Thanks 😄
Last Q, option a is correct since option 4 (or d) is just same as statement a. You cannot have the same conclusion as any of the statement.
No words for this trick
Amazing video
Simplest and best method... Gd work
Finally I understand syllogism 😚
I have a Question… he says Income can’t be greater than Expenditure but does opposite to it 👀😐
@@waleedwt4008 yeah
Thanks for sharing valuable information 🙏🙏
Sir kabhi aap khe rhe ho income cannot be greater than expenditure or kabhi income can be greater than expenditure.
English problem😄, he is little bit confused....
Rule is - INCOME WILL BE GREATER THAN EXPENDITURE.
@@rajeshwarikonderi3764 😂😁 ok
5 saal purana video mat dekho.
Yeah even he is making more confuse
Sir You are solving our confusing or making confuse more 🤨🤨🤨🤨
Awesome awesome...my complete concept got solved
Everything about syllogism is here. Thanks for this amazing tutorial
😂🙏🏼
Sir your are great ..since there is no video whole youtube channel ..who clear concept like this 👌 i Researching for 3 hr finally i got most easy video of this concept
I'm confuse you are saying income should not be greater than expenditure and then you are saying income can be greater than expenditure
Income can be greater than expenditure.. But expenditure can't be greater than income.
Ravindra Pratap thank u for assuring
That is can't be ...not "can"
Wah sr ..wht a mind blowing way to solve it ..
This is such a great way to explain it! I'll have to remember this.
+Manish Kumar Gautam keep learning
+LIVE VIAR post some questions related with possibility case us me dikt aate hai
@@liveviar first speak correctly what you are saying
Ossm bhaii acha smjaya apne thanks...☺
When statement and conclusion are same then the conclusion will be wrong in tree and plant questions
Conclusion 2nd
Shi baat hhh
sir.what a nice tricks sir and very easy way
What to do when there are 3 statements with 4 conclusions
th-cam.com/video/YowvIf0B29E/w-d-xo.html u must see
Venn diagram method is best and very easy
Thanku sir this is great methods ever I have seen before
He must have love for Bollywood
haha
Rahul Kumar ass. Abhishek ki ho chuki
Better than every other TH-camR
But what about drawing conclusions how to draw them precisely from the statement
THE BEST video Thankyou so much sir.
Dear sir, statement is not conclusion... check the question tree , plant and herbs( option "b")
That's also my question
Statement can't be conclusion
Option "b" and option "d" aka "4"
first time i have cleared syllogism from your video thnku very much
Statement: " all managers are not graduates"
In this case manager is value 100 what about graduates?
It will be 100 and 100 as first word is all followed by Not
th-cam.com/video/YowvIf0B29E/w-d-xo.html
it is same as "no manager is graduate"
U can also write the above statement as " Some Mangers are not graduates"
than u can give 50 to manager and 100 to Graduates
Really impressive trick five star from my side
I have a doubt. In last question you said that "some trees are plants" is correct conclusion but when a statement repeats in conclusion then that conclusion is considered to be wrong. Please correct if otherwise.
Thanks.
आप सही बोल रही हो
It would have been wrong if the statement written in conclusion as a possibility.. as that is a true not possibility..
khub valo luglo. sikhte parlam
It is my first time reading syllogism and I complete it in 9 minutes, crazy fast
In 1st question you said income can't be greater than expenditure while in 2nd question you said expenditure can't be greater than income, why????
what about the statement "some trees are not plants" how do we solve that type of question.
This is negative statement
& For tree - 50 & for plant -100
Because trees attached witch some like statement & plant start with not like statement
In conclusion we consider - ve statement 😊
Groot was neva a plant... He was a born-tree ... So that's true 🙂
May be In this type of q. We can apply the value of some not 50, 100
@@pritigupta1204_ Yeahhh for Some...not statement we'll apply 50 and 100
@@spsinghrajput317 can u plz explain this with an example 🙏🏼
Thanks sir , I corrected 3 questions in 3 exam's of group a and b and group c exams ,. previously I can't get marks from this topic now I got 3 correct out of 3 with 💯 strick rate thanks 🙏
Hlo sir first of all I would like to thank you for helping us
This is the easiest way to get the answer for 3 statement like all, some, no, but wat abt the 4 statement ie some not plz reply.
I hope you will do the need ful
Its been one year and he didnt reply your.....how was your exam, in syllogism part....
No duubts about syllogism now... thanks bro
this is the best explanation i have found since studying syllogisms - thank you
Great
Thank you Sir, for the important lesson
This is very effective trick. Thanks sir🙏🙏🙏
The best explanation till now I saw in syllogism ❤️
very very helpful sir , interesting concept income and expenditure
what about either or conclusions
What a technique
Sir, your trick is not apply in every question.
Your trick is wrong 😃😃
Really excellent methodology.....Thank u
this method is totally tukka method totally fail in some aspects like in probability case and many more questions
You are wrong ... this method is the best ... i have used it always andnit never failed ... better than venn diagram method jo possibility mein confuse ksrta hai ye nhi karta
yeps bro totally fail.2 qctually questions first three statement correct 4th statement wrong
Check out My Tutorial on syllogism th-cam.com/video/9Dc7t5vvfyg/w-d-xo.html
@@shivasharma4120 bhai syllogism ka sum kar dega?
R.PRABU SARAN i guess u are referring to Q 2 (Sal, Ash and Abishek). The first 3 conclusions are correct and 4th incorrect, per my review too-Sal and Abi are disjointed/have nothing in common so a & b are correct; Ash is part of Abi so c is correct & d is wrong.
Best tutorial....thank u sir
U r saying "Income can never be greater than expenditure".
That should be Income>expenditure...
He said it wrong, but did it right
And still managed to get 1.4 million views
Best video of Syllogism on you tube 👍😊 nicely explained
no correct answer coming from ds method. something is missing.
u hv to learn these values..
Amit sharma...what do u mean by learn this values. ..I am also facing the samr problem...
He is teaching wrong ...moreever he is saying sometimes income can not be more than expenditure it should be expenditure can not be more than income
exactly broo... when statement or conclusion are both same ,, so conclusion is wrong but he said that is true ...
Bhai tumhe na aane ka ye method ... ham is method se banate aaye hain aur ye best hai
Sir this rule is valid only for 2 statements...wat about three statements??
Please do visit it may helpful
th-cam.com/video/xHpnKOPGmis/w-d-xo.html
1st question intelligent has different values which means no direct relationship of two statements,still u solved.in last question u solved in different manner.u learn and then taech
If any of the values is 100 then we can solve it..
As per your doubt, statement (a) has 50 as it's value on intelligent
And statement (b) has 100 as it's value on intelligent
Here, any one should be 100, and so it is.
Or both as 100.
That's how sum is solved.
Jab ap ny bola na income greater wahi pta lg gya ap bht acha sekhay gy 👏
Sorry sir
When statement are repeated as same in conclusion then it is taken as false.
But according to ur last question ur accept as true
Plz check it as soon as possible.
Thank u
Yes I was thinking the same
In the 2nd question by using ven diagram your answer and ven diagram answer is not same.
All abishek are ash is the only wrong conclusion.. In my solution..
very genuine video about syllogisms,,,,, all concepts are clear in this video thank u so much sir for making this video
but isn't there any rule like "restatement is always false" ??
soumi mitra hi...Do u know how to proceed with some not cases
jakir jak very sorry... I'm very poor at syllogisms 😞😞😞
yes.. restatement is always false
Conclusion b and d repeats. So it is false
Restatement is always true 💯
Can this be applied in all questions? Had doubt🤨
This is an explanation for all those who are asking how to apply +ve -ve rule on problems with more than 2 statements: Let's say we have a problem with 3 statements. now firstly we check the 1st conclusion is valid or not. Now this 1st conclusion will be either negative or positive and it contains two elements. now this two elements are either from one statement or maximum two statements. now our first conclusion is say positive and two elements of it are from two different statements. Now we apply the +ve -ve rule on those two statements 1) if the outcome is positive then we can proceed further and check with income expense method. If the conclusion satisfys income expense method then it is valid .
2) if the outcome is negative then the conclusion is invalid even if it satisfys the income expense method(we assumed that the 1st conclusion is positive) .
Apply the same procedure for all other conclusions.
Could please say in telugu if u know
@@durgabhavani5869 2 కంటే ఎక్కువ స్టేట్మెంట్లతో సమస్యలపై +ve -ve నియమాన్ని ఎలా వర్తింపజేయాలి అని అడుగుతున్న వారందరికీ ఇది వివరణ: మనకు 3 స్టేట్మెంట్లతో సమస్య ఉందని అనుకుందాం. ఇప్పుడు మొదట మేము 1వ ముగింపు చెల్లుబాటులో ఉందో లేదో తనిఖీ చేస్తాము. ఇప్పుడు ఈ 1వ ముగింపు ప్రతికూలంగా లేదా సానుకూలంగా ఉంటుంది మరియు ఇది రెండు అంశాలను కలిగి ఉంటుంది. ఇప్పుడు ఈ రెండు అంశాలు ఒక స్టేట్మెంట్ లేదా గరిష్టంగా రెండు స్టేట్మెంట్ల నుండి ఉన్నాయి. ఇప్పుడు మా మొదటి ముగింపు సానుకూలంగా చెప్పబడింది మరియు దానిలోని రెండు అంశాలు రెండు వేర్వేరు ప్రకటనల నుండి వచ్చాయి. ఇప్పుడు మేము ఆ రెండు స్టేట్మెంట్లపై +ve -ve నియమాన్ని వర్తింపజేస్తాము 1) ఫలితం సానుకూలంగా ఉంటే, మేము మరింత ముందుకు సాగవచ్చు మరియు ఆదాయ వ్యయ పద్ధతిని తనిఖీ చేయవచ్చు. ముగింపు ఆదాయ వ్యయ పద్ధతిని సంతృప్తిపరిచినట్లయితే, అది చెల్లుబాటు అవుతుంది.
2) ఫలితం ప్రతికూలంగా ఉంటే, అది ఆదాయ వ్యయ పద్ధతిని సంతృప్తిపరిచినప్పటికీ ముగింపు చెల్లదు (1వ ముగింపు సానుకూలంగా ఉందని మేము భావించాము) .
అన్ని ఇతర ముగింపుల కోసం అదే విధానాన్ని వర్తించండి.
K lm gh
How to know if the statement is negative or positive?
Wow man. Thankyou so much. I would say that reading this comment was the best part in the entire video. Truly grateful 🙏
In question no 2 (when 1 statment is negative and second statement is positive how will rule 1 is applied????
I want to ask
If there are 2 statements :
All soldiers must be healthy
Some soldiers are 70 kg weight
What are the conclusions can you give for me? More than 1 of course
some healthy are 70kg is trure.
I think thats it
Amazing technique sir!!!
Ur teaching method is amazing Sir
But joh last question m conclusion no (b) nd (d) wrong hoga bcoz conclusion m same statement given hota h toh voh wrong hota h 😊
For bank SSC Railway only:Repeat statement in conclusion is wrong
Last wala wrong hai 100%
sir what about possibility questions?
In 4th example(viz. plants & herbs) u have used same statements as premises and as well as conclusions.Stmt-a=concln-d and stmt-b=concln-b. So there's no need to apply any rule to derive conclusions.
Thanks bro bohot achi video banai hai
8:55 App galat ho sir. statement and conclusion same nai hona chahihe.
You are correct. I also noticed the same thing.
Only work in some and all.What about the possibility case
I think that you have taught wrong
Because no salman is abhishekh and no abhishekh is salman will be right but you said that the statement is wrong
Again clear it
Rohit kumar Saw totally this method is wrong bro pls dont follow this method most of the questions will get wrong
best video for syllogism
Confused moredan Rahul Gandhi in 2nd question he said statement a) _ve b)+ve he should apply rule num 2 according to coclusion 1 ) but he said apply rule num 3 😁😁
great explanation.... in one statement he is saying income can not be greater than expense and in other he says as income is less than expense so statement is wrong.
Just amazing bro...
Dont use it...its not applicable everywhere
th-cam.com/video/knFLfSr35wU/w-d-xo.html watch this for all statements
sir what a beautiful trick 🤗
I m confused in relation of income & expenditure..
th-cam.com/video/YowvIf0B29E/w-d-xo.html🙄 u may see
nice bhai very short way to learn syllogism
u should draw a vann diagram. it's help in find out the deduction
Nyc sir please either or wale b samjhao sir
Hi very good class but I need some more examples with possiblility cases....
Check out My Tutorial on syllogism th-cam.com/video/9Dc7t5vvfyg/w-d-xo.html
Second example main positive negative statement hain to answer negative hona chahiye na.??? Positive negative rule kab apply karenge
Yeah I also have the same doubt
In that example he is saying to watch only second statement
But according to rules dono statement dekhne hai
Ur explanation is so confusing
Great explanation tq so much
clear your doubts 1st then make a video
Ya youre right
YOUR TRICKS IS 100% WORK ON EVERY QUESTIONS .............................................................. I SOLVED 100 QUESTIONS AND THIS TRICK WORKS ON APPROX 67 QUESTIONS
There can be alternative solutions to this problems―if we use the set arrangement method
You are great thanks for the trick