I didn't have a great source or angle to see things I love but after discovering your channel I haven't skipped a day in months. It's nice your videos can ease a person into the subject and you're amazing at explaining/sourcing out the information. Much love Anton!
So if we face each other and you raise your left and I raise my right are we p symmetrical or mirroring each other. I'm polarized in my thinking so maybe your response will be polarizing?
@@beavans what if we are standing shoulder to shoulder buttocks in opposite direction you on my left me on your right then we rotate our necks to face each other? I don't think we could raise our prospective hands very easy like in certain directions.
dont know why i want to tell you this. you talk funny. i love you though. your editing and soundtrack is wonderful. i have watched A LOT of your videos over the past year. when i watch you i see how much editing you put into making the words and sentences sound right, and it shows. great job. its honestly refreshing to see a real human, and.. well ill keep it shortish. keep making vids.
Man it's amazing how much data we are able to extrapolate just from the CMB emissions. I hope we have follow up studies on this in the near future that will boost the confidence of the results, it would make sense and be very exciting that there are more asymmetries and anisotropies than we assumed.
I wonder if we are observing two universes merging like 2 galaxies do...which is why we don't see symmetry in the universe yet like we do a stable galaxy not in the process of merging with another.
As our observational capabilities increase, a lot of what's considered solid theory will be rewritten. Already is. I think that the universe will be found to be spherical and not flat with the next ten years. Whenever they get the JWST in orbit at least.
This is exciting because it involves a particle model that I've worked on and my advisor has published a number of papers on. Cool to see something related to my research talked about on youtube!
U1>SU2>SU3>!(0.132) Add e, Pi and sq2, to the third decimal. Add the FIRST 1 from the start of the prime sequence. We have an energy dipole with the factorial embed code. 6.132
*_Question:_* Could we potentially use this piece of information to better predict quantum effects? If the universe has a preference, does this preference translate all the way down to the subatomic level? Can we maybe work on throwing out the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and take a swing at understanding the universe at a more deterministic level by adding another data point? Maybe the universe has a preference for where a particle will be at any given time which we can use this piece of information to calculate? *_Bonus Question:_* Relative to what is the universe symmetrical? Is it all observers, or is there a place in the universe where this effect does not take place? In other words, is the effect local to our own galaxy or would we perceive this effect from the other end of the observable universe? *_Bonus Bonus Question:_* If the universe is indeed infinitely large, how can anyone calculate this with any degree of certainty, let alone 92% certainty? Since, potentially, only a very small, or at least unknowable percentage of the universe is actually visible, isn't it possible that we're only seeing a tiny piece of the whole? Look at it this way - Say that the entire observable universe is the size of a small portion of the iris of your eye. Your iris is not symmetrical. However, it is only a tiny portion of the whole of your face, which most certainly *_is symmetrical..._* (Mostly) So, if we can't see the whole face, how can we ever determine if the universe is symmetrical or not with *any* degree of certainty? Just some food for thought. I'd love to hear some answers or other questions.
I'm wondering if this polarization that very distant light has, could be (maybe) related to some effect similar to the redshift. Perhaps the universe, additionally to its expansion, is twisting itself somehow in a way that generates that polarization. Amazing video!! Keep it up, Anton! EDIT: this may seem to be related to the topic of polarizing lenses. If you stack three filters, consecutively rotated 45º from eachother, the result turns to be that not all the light is blocked. This two topics seem to be intrinsecally related.
Could this be the clue to the inverse universe where antimatter is more prevelent on the other side of the singular and we ended up with the matter side of the universe? I like how you explain the concepts in easy to follow steps. Great work. Really enjoyed it.
The possible p-asymmetrical nature of the universe reminds me of what in the chemical world is known as enantiomerism or chirality, where there are mirror image isomers that aren't superimposable. Amino acids important for life on earth seem to favor the so-called left handed isomer over the right handed one, but why isn't well understood. Other classes of molecules such as simple sugars favor right handed isomers.
Here is where you will be disappointed. The universe is a brain. Left sided brain means right handed. So the universe is right handed. Sorry to burst your Hubble bubble.
8:30 If true, what differences would our universe have if "flipped"? Would there be extra matter such as unseen galaxies or something that doesn't exist naturally in our universe like super anti matter?
This might be one of the most important discoveries of our lifetime. I'm excited to see more news related to this! Once again your videos are incredible. Keep doing what you do!
anton you always take the most complicated subjects and make it more simple - well - not really simple ...but more understandable. thanks for this one.
I've always said - "Life is a complex chemical process which isolates chemicals necessary for life to exist into locations favorable for life to continue existing." - E.G. Life on earth attempts to keep life chemistry on the surface of the earth, because not doing so would obliviate the possibility of future life. I would sorta argue that with expansive life in the universe we'd likely see more phosphorus due to life sequestering the material. I jokingly mentioned in a Isaac Arthur thread that perhaps some higher intelligence just goes around and harvests phosphorus from life bearing planets, for their own consumption. But I really think if any creature was advanced enough for space travel, they'd just be able to create most any atomic structures they want through fusion.
2:48 min In this case in particular, it's not really asymmetrical It the exact reverse result of the symmetrical object In other terms, the force that could create an opposite visual effect is more powerful than the result It seems to say the both are really different Symmetrical effect and sens effect If the results are quite the same with a different result time, it seems to define a particular interaction between the both effects that could be compared on different symmetrical objects The interferences between mirror effect that could be visual magnetic or any other And the power sens effect that creates the result I've found a simple picture of a smartphone on a water table with the sun reflection on It seems identical, but the water modify a few the light result in reality The result with clouds and various colors around a double light bulb center is quite the same as the gallaxy views I really like the presentation of the experimenters you did on many videos, and it confirms this interesting fact, all those very important research and observe are from humans All types, all sex and all countries :-) Back to the symmetry... In fact as we seems symmetrical, we're not The symmetry of a half face is different from the symmetry of the other half face But the difference are minimal that's why we seems to be identical on both parts In fact each time of our lives we have preferences or simply no choices If you sleep always on the same side, your body will grow differently If your always exposed to an effect on one side, it will modify a few this side Then mote visible, if you always use the same arm, it will be stronger This could be the possible result of an external condition that modify the universe natural symmetry According to the similitude between univers and brain but also this video, it's a possible dual brain With a central command center, as our brain or all others brain forms The both parts are at first very similar, but more the time cumul informations by physical reactions, more the difference between is important There's an interesting fact in brains Either the brain is damaged, some important informations will be conserved and transmit to the other side, they can be forgotten a time or just been recreate in another location with the important useful elements That's the way we modify our memories to obtain a good result according to our known informations The only reminding informations will be the essential ones, not all the other un-useful ones Permitting our permanent adaptation with the good informations according to the objective, the needs There's probably too much stars to really understand what could be the minding of the universe, but we're a part of, so we probably know more than we thought In comparison to our experiences that are a part of the universe experiences, simply because it rules our living forms Could gamma ray be at the origin of the expression of the ADN... This could explain the symmetry result The gamma rays, reflecting on the elements as cristals to express a 3 dimensions form that will be modified during it own life process according to the first logical system include in the ADN The fourth dimension is the result of the time or temperature, and the personal vectors choices ADN express also a twist movement, like coils in electricity and those coils permit to consider informations flows I'm really curious if i'll be able one day to understand why does it naturally twist everything at all scales size So what could be at the origin of the phenomenon According to the marble seeds, the rotation of the galaxy is more like a permanent falling than a liquid interaction result In this mind thinking, i really wonder if the quantity of galaxy arms as an incidence on the speed of the global rotation movement... Does it interact more with more interactive arms ? Also there's a problem with the falling representation, according to the fact the gallaxy are not falling in the same direction, but... :-) Considering smoke in ambient air, the movements created are very different vectors The dust has also a particularity, it's really very electrostatic, that's in fact the reason of the visible dust, some electrostatic small elements wich linked because of the potential effect Electricity when you talk about static, is a high voltage with very low amperage In my research and opinion, speed is equal to voltage, heat or time, is more equal to amperage The way we calculate electric current is very interesting The speed is consider as constant, but in reality it's different between materials, and more you add voltage, more the signal in a metal is quick The other quicker solution without voltage or current flow is light, information follows the filaments, the optical fibre Tbe observation of the universe seems to be a melting pot of signal interfering one with others, but If the signals are different the origin source can be the same, and the power difference can be found If you obtain the power and an information of speed or heat, this could give you answers I'm really happy if this ideas helps the global understanding of our living place and how it works I'hope you'll found the good answers, it will probably become difficult for me to continue, i'v been stolen all my life and will be probably out of my house next year Wish you a better life
It depends on the kind of symmetry you are talking about. Parity symmetry is about the coordinate system symmetry. In other words, if you flip the coordinate system on which you observe the object, the behaviour of the object should not change. However in the case of the clock illustration the behaviour does indeed change which breaks this symmetry, therefore it is indeed asymmetrical.
I understand few of this, but can't it have to do with a gradient in expansion from out the theoretical center of the universe combined with the assumption that we are not in that center? Something like, beyond space and time being bound, is there another kind of universal structure that varies, depending on the distance to this center?
Yes, 4D spacetime is chiral and we kind of knew this already. We have just been trying to ignore it since it's hard to comprehend. The color/strong interaction preserves the P-symmetry to the maximal degree available. The weak interaction violates the P-symmetry to the maximal degree available given the strong sector. The electroweak interaction preserves the P-symmetry to the maximal degree available given the weak sector. Gravity just doesn't care. It's the honeybadger of the interactions. And all we really needed to know this is to calculate the effects of a fricking magnet when viewed via a mirror.
This is a fascinating subject... while we don't know why our universe is left-handed, once it's majority choice was left-handed, right-handed was on a loosing battle! As left-handed and right-handed can't interact with each other! That got me thinking about parallel or multi-universes... If we happened to travel to a right-handed one.... we could drink water and eat food there, but actually die as our left-handed bodies can't break down right-handed... then i realised air won't work either, so no waiting to starve to death or die of dehydration... you have a couple of minutes at best until asphyxiation gets you!
Hello wonderful Anton. Another sin against symetry can be observed in our own bodies. It is chirality. Amino acids turn the polarisation of light to the right (dextrogyre acids) or to the left (levogyre). Living beings hace a strong preference for levogyre amino acids although both the levogyre and the dextrogyre versions have the same chemical formula and the same properties. For other matters, they seem to prefer dextro. For instance most humans are right-handed while most cats are left-handed. Sugars are more easily assimilated in dextrogyre form. Here also, the reason for these preference remains unknown (at least to me).
Feel like this ties in to the universe being dipole shaped and how things are moving overall.....universally. The shape may be toroidal and flowing around in a certain direction resulting in what we're seeing.
Although he said the CMB was polarized, the comparison was against light from the milky way. So I'm not sure if it would help in providing an orientation.
The very first thing that jumped into my mind as a likely explanation for this is the matter / antimatter creation and mutual annihilation shortly after the big bang. In our universe, matter "won", hence the skew. The slightest disparity of the distribution of the remaining matter would kick gravity into doing what it does. Dense areas get denser, sparse areas get sparser.
u could give us an example of how polarized filters work in photography to be able to take a picture of something behind a glass without seeing the reflections of anything on that glass ... what with polarized light being the party piece of this wonderful video, perhaps we could link that lack of symmetry in the laws of the universe so to speak with the Hubble constant, not being a constant after all as well ... ?
Take an hour glass, turn it upside down. Can you tell which way was the original flow of time? Isnt retrograde of the planets similar to an hour glass getting turned. We are using only a very small amount of time and just reusing it by flipping the hour glass.
Electrons rotate one way, Positrons rotate to opposite direction. Phi : 1, Magnetic Universe. Andrea Getz said black holes are rotating backwards. Or, black holes are Counterspacial Sinks and rotate in the opposite direction, in CounterSpace. Like, e- and p+, Space and CounterSpace. 1836 positions = 1 Proton.
Hello, mon ami. In the early 1980s I picked up a book I didn't quite understand the title of... so I bought it. "The Left Hand of Creation" (Harrison?) A curious title for a book on particle physics for that time. The author posited there was far more antimatter created at the time of the Big Bang and where it might have all gone. That was forty years ago; long before the discovery of the CBMR. I sincerely hope the author is still with us to witness his 1/2 century old thoughts merge with recent disapplies. Ain't science great?! Thanks Frank W. Ont. Canada
Anton - given the time it takes for light from all these distant places in the universe to get to us - does this mean the maps we have of the universe are in effect time maps? so how do we know what the universe actually looks like now? Does that mean we only know how fast distant things are moving in the past but not the present? and if there was a "singularity" how is it that light from points where we once were is still reaching us? so confused ....
I often hear people referring to gravity as a force. It isn't a force, it's an effect. The presence of matter curves spacetime. An object in orbit is not held in place by any force, it is travelling a straight line through curved spacetime. An object accelerating towards a concentration of matter, such as the Earth, a Neutron Star or a Black Hole, feels no acceleration because it isn't actually accelerating in spacetime.... it is stationary. On the contrary, we stood on the ground are accelerating upwards through spacetime and that is the force that we feel - inertia (inertia from our constant acceleration). That's not really a force either. This was well understood and explained by Albert Einstein, long before most of us were born.
Wow...this is mindblowing. So ALL wavelengths of light were polarized by the same (beta) angle? Is there a way to test for other galaxies further away to see how much their (beta) angle is? So many questions, thanks for this video Anton. Do you have a link to the original paper?
My only question is are not the two clocks in some directional parity if the clock hands are observed going to the right, at least from a 2-D viewing perspective such as me watching the video? Ya know, the observer thing? Just a question. And Anton, thank you for your videos. I feel like I can understand some things and appreciate the vastness of space a little bit more.☺
There is a video called Why Gravity is NOT a Force that sort of ties to this I think... it's like the universe flows in a way as to not only create structure but enable movement, gravity, and flow of time
Excellent! Does explain a lot. Now, contemplate left/right handed matter.... dark matter ; ) I want to thank Wonderful People in accepting this Noble prize! Merry Christmas
I suspect it makes a difference which "side" of the universe you are on. The best analogy I can think of is if you look down on Earth from what we call The North Pole it spins counter clockwise. Looking up at the South Pole it appears to be clockwise.
cons of universe being left sided: when two mirrors face each other the reflected image becomes greener and greener down the line in the mirror pros: elaborate intricate physical existence outside of complete equilibrium
This is interesting, it ties in to something else I read the other day which said that the Hubble constant may not be a constant, it might vary depending in the direction. DNA itself is left handed so I wonder if the universe is left handed? If so, I wonder if being left handed has any advantages? Interesting times.....
This topic is bringing back organic chemistry nightmares with chirality. I seem to remember the old naming convention with R and S isomerism, did so because R or clockwise was "right" and S was CCW and "left" or considered "sinister". Humans have a weird preference for things going the right way that goes back a long time, maybe they were onto something?
maybe this is why time flows in one direction, too...going the other way would make everything completely different, and because that's internally inconsistent with what we think would happen by simply reversing events, time travel isn't possible in this universe
Anton, serious question because I'm confused. When the universe expands, how does that work? Do little pockets of space come into existence and cause space to expand? I'm so confused
>the mystery of parity Parity is when parts of the galaxies are copied from one universe to another, so although you lose at least 1 universe's size in the array, there is a level of redundancy. In a RAID-5, one universe can fail, but the galaxies will still be intact, maintained by merging the parity sectors from the other universes -- this creates a slowdown, and it's known as a "degraded" RAID, but it gives you time to get a new universe to replace the failed one. A RAID-6 provides redundancy against up to TWO universes failing AT THE SAME TIME, offering further security of your galaxies. 100% parity is acquired through a RAID-1, where for each universe, there is a FULL copy of it, ready for backup, should the primary 1 fail. A RAID-0 provides no parity and no redundancy, so it is not recommended for sensitive galaxies, lifeforms, etc. But it does allow civilization to write up a history much faster. However, you can even combine these together, to create RAID-10 or RAID-50. Alternatively, there are some infrequently-used RAID arrays, such as RAID-4, RAID-7, or RAID-8. --- A non-RAID solution is "volume management", where the galaxies themselves are copied, split, etc. across multiple universes, and this provides the ability to dynamically resize them, but it's not always the fastest, has a bit more overhead, and it's not as portable. --- Other advancements in quantum data storage allow for universes to automatically correct through dynamic sector parities, check sums, and splitting up the constellations. Two examples are ZFS and BTRFS -- both of these also provide additional protection against "galactic rot", so failing to observe a phenomenon for too long does NOT result in corruption of the universe, and you don't wind up with Mandela Effect types of anomalies. However, most modern universes have a level of ECC, error-correcting code, whereby they sacrifice an amount of storage potential, often leading to large amounts of dark matter that cannot be accounted for (up to ~10% less than the advertised size). This code fixes such anomalies, and it's USUALLY not detectable, unless the universe is beginning to fail. However, it provides a primary source of protection, and the loss of 10% of the storage often doesn't hurt much, given the size of modern universes.
The universe only seems to have a side preference because it wants to look its best when we observe it. This is pretty common behavior for a lot of stars.
I have always thought the CMB looked like it has a sort of curved “stream” in it. The picture has a super void in the bottom right, and somewhat in the top left too. Definitely makes you think that the universe did have a “spin” to it from the earliest instances.
If the wavelength of starlight is red-shifted, then the polarization rates will be red-shifted as well. Our local spin will manifest as a rotating polarization relative to the deep field, and it would not be symmetric. This would, however, be very minor.
Very interesting. If the light we can detect is polarized left, what if the dark matter/energy is polarized right? Too simple, nothing is that easy.. but it's so weird it makes you think.
After watching: Would this help create physical time travel? No. But, in my opinion, this may be the groundbreaking work to communicate with the past. I hope I do not appear insane Mr. Petrov.
Could the basic shape of the universe be that of a vortex? There seems to be this tendency for everything that moves eventually to travel in spiral. Just as the movement of air and ocean currents on earth are shaped by the earth's rotation, could the movement of objects everywhere be shaped by cosmic rotation? That would account for a lack of universal symmetry.
Great vid, Anton. Do you know there is a Gravitational Wave Events app on ITunes? It’s information shared by the LIGO/Virgo and will give a sounder when these labs pick up a shift in the gravitational waves that pass though through Earth. I’m not associated in any way with the app, I just thought when a notification happens, you could discuss it on your channel. I’d like to hear your analysis of the event. Thanks for your time a again, great channel!
it did look a little odd, your head normally tilts right, your left. didnt realise why till you pointed it out, thought it was just bcause you were on the wrong side of the screen :-)
----> The Standard Model of the Universe is based on the unified field theory (aka the Big Bang)... the breaking of absolute symmetry. Perhaps the discrepancies in polarization has something to do with the other forces and the formation of quarks. At some point the weak force separated from the electro-weak force.
I didn't have a great source or angle to see things I love but after discovering your channel I haven't skipped a day
in months. It's nice your videos can ease a person into the subject and you're amazing at explaining/sourcing out
the information. Much love Anton!
Well, I'm left handed and until now the whole universe seemed righthanded to me so this makes me happy!
My first thought also 😂👌🏼
I have always said leftys rule the universe.
So if we face each other and you raise your left and I raise my right are we p symmetrical or mirroring each other. I'm polarized in my thinking so maybe your response will be polarizing?
left hand master race ;p.
@@beavans what if we are standing shoulder to shoulder buttocks in opposite direction you on my left me on your right then we rotate our necks to face each other? I don't think we could raise our prospective hands very easy like in certain directions.
I cant wait to see your "James Webb has discovered Life" video.
And it will be telescope testing and calibrating by looking at Earth
I can't wait to see ANYONE'S video "James Webb is in space and all systems are 100% working as expected"
Booooo, taith no faith. Or too much Faith.
Damn bro...I wish that happens!!!
Science is my only god!!!
😄😄😄😄
If the aliens get here & don't hang out with Anton, then they're not worth our time
dont know why i want to tell you this. you talk funny. i love you though. your editing and soundtrack is wonderful. i have watched A LOT of your videos over the past year. when i watch you i see how much editing you put into making the words and sentences sound right, and it shows. great job. its honestly refreshing to see a real human, and.. well ill keep it shortish. keep making vids.
Seeing Anton on the left side of the screen makes me uncomfortable.
Anton cocks his head when he speaks, so that was a good tip-off as to what was going on. I bet that was what gave you such a reaction.
He has a hair curl on top of his head that makes it possible to tell his polarization.
@@KarstenJohansson I had not noticed before this video. Now I will probably never not notice...
Plot twist, Anton's image has always been inverted all along. That was the real Anton
He certainly looks more sinister
I come here every time he posts a video just so I can hear "Hello wonderful person", also to learn new stuff I guess
I lost when I saw this
I come to count how many times he says "essentially"
>__>
Seriously I can't not notice someone help!
@@planescaped On my side he said it just when I read your comment, lmao
Man it's amazing how much data we are able to extrapolate just from the CMB emissions. I hope we have follow up studies on this in the near future that will boost the confidence of the results, it would make sense and be very exciting that there are more asymmetries and anisotropies than we assumed.
Holy shit! These are really exciting findings. I don't understand why everyone isn't subscribed to your channel. Thanks for the science update Anton!
I wonder if we are observing two universes merging like 2 galaxies do...which is why we don't see symmetry in the universe yet like we do a stable galaxy not in the process of merging with another.
Every discovery that makes us question our assumptions is a great discovery. 😊
As our observational capabilities increase, a lot of what's considered solid theory will be rewritten. Already is. I think that the universe will be found to be spherical and not flat with the next ten years. Whenever they get the JWST in orbit at least.
@@keefjunior4061 I don't know if it's going to be spherical, though. I would bet in a pretty weird shape. 😬
This is exciting because it involves a particle model that I've worked on and my advisor has published a number of papers on. Cool to see something related to my research talked about on youtube!
U1>SU2>SU3>!(0.132)
Add e, Pi and sq2, to the third decimal. Add the FIRST 1 from the start of the prime sequence. We have an energy dipole with the factorial embed code. 6.132
*_Question:_*
Could we potentially use this piece of information to better predict quantum effects? If the universe has a preference, does this preference translate all the way down to the subatomic level? Can we maybe work on throwing out the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and take a swing at understanding the universe at a more deterministic level by adding another data point?
Maybe the universe has a preference for where a particle will be at any given time which we can use this piece of information to calculate?
*_Bonus Question:_*
Relative to what is the universe symmetrical? Is it all observers, or is there a place in the universe where this effect does not take place? In other words, is the effect local to our own galaxy or would we perceive this effect from the other end of the observable universe?
*_Bonus Bonus Question:_*
If the universe is indeed infinitely large, how can anyone calculate this with any degree of certainty, let alone 92% certainty? Since, potentially, only a very small, or at least unknowable percentage of the universe is actually visible, isn't it possible that we're only seeing a tiny piece of the whole? Look at it this way - Say that the entire observable universe is the size of a small portion of the iris of your eye. Your iris is not symmetrical. However, it is only a tiny portion of the whole of your face, which most certainly *_is symmetrical..._* (Mostly)
So, if we can't see the whole face, how can we ever determine if the universe is symmetrical or not with *any* degree of certainty?
Just some food for thought. I'd love to hear some answers or other questions.
Hello Anton , this is wonderful person.
I'm wondering if this polarization that very distant light has, could be (maybe) related to some effect similar to the redshift. Perhaps the universe, additionally to its expansion, is twisting itself somehow in a way that generates that polarization. Amazing video!! Keep it up, Anton!
EDIT: this may seem to be related to the topic of polarizing lenses. If you stack three filters, consecutively rotated 45º from eachother, the result turns to be that not all the light is blocked. This two topics seem to be intrinsecally related.
Well that just confused the heck out of me. Thanks for another great video.
Could this be the clue to the inverse universe where antimatter is more prevelent on the other side of the singular and we ended up with the matter side of the universe?
I like how you explain the concepts in easy to follow steps. Great work. Really enjoyed it.
This is just Anton bragging how his face is symmetrical. We get it buddy, you're handsome :D
@Paul Robert Super Sus
I'm happy that I'm not the only person who thinks so!
Symmetry flex ^_^
This...
And then he posted that carbon dating system thing...
This is going somewhere.
I was hoping he was going to demonstrate symmetry violation by donning a goatee and being Evil Anton.
Isn't left handedness a sign of the Devil?
Oh my God, we're all in hell
Yes🔥🔥👺. Welcome to 2020!
Explains 2020
We are in the bad place.
(reference to "the Good Place")
@@En_theo fork 😬🤣
How didn't you catch that? Just look at 2020!
Wow, a pretty new and cool discovery! Thank you for sharing!
The possible p-asymmetrical nature of the universe reminds me of what in the chemical world is known as enantiomerism or chirality, where there are mirror image isomers that aren't superimposable. Amino acids important for life on earth seem to favor the so-called left handed isomer over the right handed one, but why isn't well understood. Other classes of molecules such as simple sugars favor right handed isomers.
I appreciate you so much anton
Me, a left handed person: I might not allign with the majority of humans but i do allign with the universe, good to know.
Here is where you will be disappointed. The universe is a brain. Left sided brain means right handed. So the universe is right handed. Sorry to burst your Hubble bubble.
... both plasma ! 😏
@@Masked_Official damn.
Hmm well a true ambis like me really are disenfranchised.
@@Masked_Official Universe Is Brain Of Brahma
The future you which currently the present you had guided me here to witness the mirror you.
Wonderful.
Does any of this have anything to do with the cold spot thats said to be evidence of another universe once entangled with our own?
8:30 If true, what differences would our universe have if "flipped"? Would there be extra matter such as unseen galaxies or something that doesn't exist naturally in our universe like super anti matter?
This might be one of the most important discoveries of our lifetime. I'm excited to see more news related to this!
Once again your videos are incredible. Keep doing what you do!
anton you always take the most complicated subjects and make it more simple - well - not really simple ...but more understandable. thanks for this one.
Thank you. This is a wonderful day. I love when assumptions about the universe are proven wrong. I hope for more good news to come.
Is the lack of phosphorus then expected evidence against the commonality of life or. Evidence for life some could be absorbing it
I've always said - "Life is a complex chemical process which isolates chemicals necessary for life to exist into locations favorable for life to continue existing." - E.G. Life on earth attempts to keep life chemistry on the surface of the earth, because not doing so would obliviate the possibility of future life.
I would sorta argue that with expansive life in the universe we'd likely see more phosphorus due to life sequestering the material. I jokingly mentioned in a Isaac Arthur thread that perhaps some higher intelligence just goes around and harvests phosphorus from life bearing planets, for their own consumption.
But I really think if any creature was advanced enough for space travel, they'd just be able to create most any atomic structures they want through fusion.
@@prozacgodretro i was thinking space germs active metabolizing space bacteria
Came here from the volcanic glass and RNA video 😁 stay wonderful!
Im here from your other video about life today
I feel out of place when I don’t watch your videos. 👋 Thank you, wonderful person!
@xrm160xqw that too!! 😫 😂😂
Maybe the universe is traveling in some direction within some larger space...
A lopsided universe sounds pretty awesome ngl. Like a giant weakly interacting particle
As above so below.
yeah, the universe is all wibbly wobbly, timey wimey... oh wait... I jumped tracks.
@@jimleane7578 everything is Everything
@@donvineyard8654 via tilt or push
@@2Worlds_and_InBetween yes. And everything is one. Cool tag btw☺️
2:48 min
In this case in particular, it's not really asymmetrical
It the exact reverse result of the symmetrical object
In other terms, the force that could create an opposite visual effect is more powerful than the result
It seems to say the both are really different
Symmetrical effect and sens effect
If the results are quite the same with a different result time, it seems to define a particular interaction between the both effects that could be compared on different symmetrical objects
The interferences between mirror effect that could be visual magnetic or any other
And the power sens effect that creates the result
I've found a simple picture of a smartphone on a water table with the sun reflection on
It seems identical, but the water modify a few the light result in reality
The result with clouds and various colors around a double light bulb center is quite the same as the gallaxy views
I really like the presentation of the experimenters you did on many videos, and it confirms this interesting fact, all those very important research and observe are from humans
All types, all sex and all countries :-)
Back to the symmetry...
In fact as we seems symmetrical, we're not
The symmetry of a half face is different from the symmetry of the other half face
But the difference are minimal that's why we seems to be identical on both parts
In fact each time of our lives we have preferences or simply no choices
If you sleep always on the same side, your body will grow differently
If your always exposed to an effect on one side, it will modify a few this side
Then mote visible, if you always use the same arm, it will be stronger
This could be the possible result of an external condition that modify the universe natural symmetry
According to the similitude between univers and brain but also this video, it's a possible dual brain
With a central command center, as our brain or all others brain forms
The both parts are at first very similar, but more the time cumul informations by physical reactions, more the difference between is important
There's an interesting fact in brains
Either the brain is damaged, some important informations will be conserved and transmit to the other side, they can be forgotten a time or just been recreate in another location with the important useful elements
That's the way we modify our memories to obtain a good result according to our known informations
The only reminding informations will be the essential ones, not all the other un-useful ones
Permitting our permanent adaptation with the good informations according to the objective, the needs
There's probably too much stars to really understand what could be the minding of the universe, but we're a part of, so we probably know more than we thought
In comparison to our experiences that are a part of the universe experiences, simply because it rules our living forms
Could gamma ray be at the origin of the expression of the ADN...
This could explain the symmetry result
The gamma rays, reflecting on the elements as cristals to express a 3 dimensions form that will be modified during it own life process according to the first logical system include in the ADN
The fourth dimension is the result of the time or temperature, and the personal vectors choices
ADN express also a twist movement, like coils in electricity and those coils permit to consider informations flows
I'm really curious if i'll be able one day to understand why does it naturally twist everything at all scales size
So what could be at the origin of the phenomenon
According to the marble seeds, the rotation of the galaxy is more like a permanent falling than a liquid interaction result
In this mind thinking, i really wonder if the quantity of galaxy arms as an incidence on the speed of the global rotation movement...
Does it interact more with more interactive arms ?
Also there's a problem with the falling representation, according to the fact the gallaxy are not falling in the same direction, but... :-)
Considering smoke in ambient air, the movements created are very different vectors
The dust has also a particularity, it's really very electrostatic, that's in fact the reason of the visible dust, some electrostatic small elements wich linked because of the potential effect
Electricity when you talk about static, is a high voltage with very low amperage
In my research and opinion, speed is equal to voltage, heat or time, is more equal to amperage
The way we calculate electric current is very interesting
The speed is consider as constant, but in reality it's different between materials, and more you add voltage, more the signal in a metal is quick
The other quicker solution without voltage or current flow is light, information follows the filaments, the optical fibre
Tbe observation of the universe seems to be a melting pot of signal interfering one with others, but
If the signals are different the origin source can be the same, and the power difference can be found
If you obtain the power and an information of speed or heat, this could give you answers
I'm really happy if this ideas helps the global understanding of our living place and how it works
I'hope you'll found the good answers, it will probably become difficult for me to continue, i'v been stolen all my life and will be probably out of my house next year
Wish you a better life
It depends on the kind of symmetry you are talking about. Parity symmetry is about the coordinate system symmetry. In other words, if you flip the coordinate system on which you observe the object, the behaviour of the object should not change. However in the case of the clock illustration the behaviour does indeed change which breaks this symmetry, therefore it is indeed asymmetrical.
I understand few of this, but can't it have to do with a gradient in expansion from out the theoretical center of the universe combined with the assumption that we are not in that center?
Something like, beyond space and time being bound, is there another kind of universal structure that varies, depending on the distance to this center?
Very nice as usual.
Yes, 4D spacetime is chiral and we kind of knew this already. We have just been trying to ignore it since it's hard to comprehend.
The color/strong interaction preserves the P-symmetry to the maximal degree available.
The weak interaction violates the P-symmetry to the maximal degree available given the strong sector.
The electroweak interaction preserves the P-symmetry to the maximal degree available given the weak sector.
Gravity just doesn't care. It's the honeybadger of the interactions.
And all we really needed to know this is to calculate the effects of a fricking magnet when viewed via a mirror.
Hello dear! Total amateur here - So 3:38, when you say "everything", ? Meaning at the atomic level?
This is a fascinating subject...
while we don't know why our universe is left-handed, once it's majority choice was left-handed, right-handed was on a loosing battle!
As left-handed and right-handed can't interact with each other!
That got me thinking about parallel or multi-universes...
If we happened to travel to a right-handed one.... we could drink water and eat food there, but actually die as our left-handed bodies can't break down right-handed... then i realised air won't work either, so no waiting to starve to death or die of dehydration... you have a couple of minutes at best until asphyxiation gets you!
*starts Dr Wu theme*
😎✌️
She should have got the Nobel prize for that work.
Hello wonderful Anton. Another sin against symetry can be observed in our own bodies. It is chirality. Amino acids turn the polarisation of light to the right (dextrogyre acids) or to the left (levogyre). Living beings hace a strong preference for levogyre amino acids although both the levogyre and the dextrogyre versions have the same chemical formula and the same properties. For other matters, they seem to prefer dextro. For instance most humans are right-handed while most cats are left-handed. Sugars are more easily assimilated in dextrogyre form. Here also, the reason for these preference remains unknown (at least to me).
"They asked this lady called Dr. Wu"
"Dr. Who?"
"No no, Dr. Wu"
Im sorry
Nobel: 'who?'
Who?, You?
No, Iam Yu
Who are You?
I 've just told you, Iam Yu
and who is he?
He is Me, and Iam Yu
(Rush Hour)
Wu’s on first?..
Wu who!
As a party pooper, I got to say the words are pronounced entirely differently.
Feel like this ties in to the universe being dipole shaped and how things are moving overall.....universally. The shape may be toroidal and flowing around in a certain direction resulting in what we're seeing.
Anton, you’re a wonderful person. Thank you.
Hello wonderful Anton, this is person.
If the CMB is indeed polarized, could we use it as a sort of space compass for navigation?
Although he said the CMB was polarized, the comparison was against light from the milky way. So I'm not sure if it would help in providing an orientation.
If the universe has a preference on emersions of energy could a EM drive be possible as there is not a equal and opposite reaction in the other side?
The very first thing that jumped into my mind as a likely explanation for this is the matter / antimatter creation and mutual annihilation shortly after the big bang. In our universe, matter "won", hence the skew. The slightest disparity of the distribution of the remaining matter would kick gravity into doing what it does. Dense areas get denser, sparse areas get sparser.
u could give us an example of how polarized filters work in photography to be able to take a picture of something behind a glass without seeing the reflections of anything on that glass ... what with polarized light being the party piece of this wonderful video, perhaps we could link that lack of symmetry in the laws of the universe so to speak with the Hubble constant, not being a constant after all as well ... ?
Take an hour glass, turn it upside down. Can you tell which way was the original flow of time? Isnt retrograde of the planets similar to an hour glass getting turned. We are using only a very small amount of time and just reusing it by flipping the hour glass.
Electrons rotate one way, Positrons rotate to opposite direction. Phi : 1, Magnetic Universe.
Andrea Getz said black holes are rotating backwards. Or, black holes are Counterspacial Sinks and rotate in the opposite direction, in CounterSpace. Like, e- and p+, Space and CounterSpace. 1836 positions = 1 Proton.
Hello, mon ami. In the early 1980s I picked up a book I didn't quite understand the title of... so I bought it. "The Left Hand of Creation" (Harrison?) A curious title for a book on particle physics for that time. The author posited there was far more antimatter created at the time of the Big Bang and where it might have all gone. That was forty years ago; long before the discovery of the CBMR. I sincerely hope the author is still with us to witness his 1/2 century old thoughts merge with recent disapplies. Ain't science great?! Thanks Frank W. Ont. Canada
Anton - given the time it takes for light from all these distant places in the universe to get to us - does this mean the maps we have of the universe are in effect time maps? so how do we know what the universe actually looks like now? Does that mean we only know how fast distant things are moving in the past but not the present? and if there was a "singularity" how is it that light from points where we once were is still reaching us? so confused ....
In 1972 Isaac Asimov published "The Left Hand of the Electron". He also discussed the "handedness" of the universe.
I often hear people referring to gravity as a force. It isn't a force, it's an effect.
The presence of matter curves spacetime. An object in orbit is not held in place by any force, it is travelling a straight line through curved spacetime.
An object accelerating towards a concentration of matter, such as the Earth, a Neutron Star or a Black Hole, feels no acceleration because it isn't actually accelerating in spacetime.... it is stationary. On the contrary, we stood on the ground are accelerating upwards through spacetime and that is the force that we feel - inertia (inertia from our constant acceleration). That's not really a force either.
This was well understood and explained by Albert Einstein, long before most of us were born.
Wow...this is mindblowing.
So ALL wavelengths of light were polarized by the same (beta) angle?
Is there a way to test for other galaxies further away to see how much their (beta) angle is?
So many questions, thanks for this video Anton. Do you have a link to the original paper?
My only question is are not the two clocks in some directional parity if the clock hands are observed going to the right, at least from a 2-D viewing perspective such as me watching the video? Ya know, the observer thing? Just a question. And Anton, thank you for your videos. I feel like I can understand some things and appreciate the vastness of space a little bit more.☺
There is a video called Why Gravity is NOT a Force that sort of ties to this I think... it's like the universe flows in a way as to not only create structure but enable movement, gravity, and flow of time
But how do you define the concepts of left & right?
Is it left handed looking in- or out? From a certain point of view...
Excellent! Does explain a lot.
Now, contemplate left/right handed matter.... dark matter ; )
I want to thank Wonderful People in accepting this Noble prize!
Merry Christmas
THat the universe has a preference, you can also see in chiral molecules?
I suspect it makes a difference which "side" of the universe you are on. The best analogy I can think of is if you look down on Earth from what we call The North Pole it spins counter clockwise. Looking up at the South Pole it appears to be clockwise.
No! I didn't get that it was a mirrored version. (Before you mentioned it)
But, I thought that something was wrong, right from the start.
Yea, people are not exactly left-right symmetric.
cons of universe being left sided: when two mirrors face each other the reflected image becomes greener and greener down the line in the mirror
pros: elaborate intricate physical existence outside of complete equilibrium
Makes sense to me, also consider amino acids or at least natural amino acids also share the same bias
0:33 Deadpan flexing 💪on his looks and he knows it 🤣 God I live your channel bro you're amazing
This is interesting, it ties in to something else I read the other day which said that the Hubble constant may not be a constant, it might vary depending in the direction.
DNA itself is left handed so I wonder if the universe is left handed? If so, I wonder if being left handed has any advantages?
Interesting times.....
This topic is bringing back organic chemistry nightmares with chirality. I seem to remember the old naming convention with R and S isomerism, did so because R or clockwise was "right" and S was CCW and "left" or considered "sinister". Humans have a weird preference for things going the right way that goes back a long time, maybe they were onto something?
Doesn't most proteins and things like that have a predominant left hand turn to them?
Hey Wonderful Instructor Anton! Tell me please what star app you use. Is it Celestia?
maybe this is why time flows in one direction, too...going the other way would make everything completely different, and because that's internally inconsistent with what we think would happen by simply reversing events, time travel isn't possible in this universe
It depends if you are in the right or left on of the pendilum
We live inside something that prefers laying on its left side.
So, what are the chances the entire Universe is rotating? Like all of space-time, for some reason? Very interesting stuff awaits!
Scalable Aether, Casimir Effect Universe. We are rotating in Aether's torus.
Anton, serious question because I'm confused. When the universe expands, how does that work? Do little pockets of space come into existence and cause space to expand? I'm so confused
>the mystery of parity
Parity is when parts of the galaxies are copied from one universe to another, so although you lose at least 1 universe's size in the array, there is a level of redundancy. In a RAID-5, one universe can fail, but the galaxies will still be intact, maintained by merging the parity sectors from the other universes -- this creates a slowdown, and it's known as a "degraded" RAID, but it gives you time to get a new universe to replace the failed one.
A RAID-6 provides redundancy against up to TWO universes failing AT THE SAME TIME, offering further security of your galaxies.
100% parity is acquired through a RAID-1, where for each universe, there is a FULL copy of it, ready for backup, should the primary 1 fail.
A RAID-0 provides no parity and no redundancy, so it is not recommended for sensitive galaxies, lifeforms, etc. But it does allow civilization to write up a history much faster.
However, you can even combine these together, to create RAID-10 or RAID-50. Alternatively, there are some infrequently-used RAID arrays, such as RAID-4, RAID-7, or RAID-8.
---
A non-RAID solution is "volume management", where the galaxies themselves are copied, split, etc. across multiple universes, and this provides the ability to dynamically resize them, but it's not always the fastest, has a bit more overhead, and it's not as portable.
---
Other advancements in quantum data storage allow for universes to automatically correct through dynamic sector parities, check sums, and splitting up the constellations. Two examples are ZFS and BTRFS -- both of these also provide additional protection against "galactic rot", so failing to observe a phenomenon for too long does NOT result in corruption of the universe, and you don't wind up with Mandela Effect types of anomalies.
However, most modern universes have a level of ECC, error-correcting code, whereby they sacrifice an amount of storage potential, often leading to large amounts of dark matter that cannot be accounted for (up to ~10% less than the advertised size). This code fixes such anomalies, and it's USUALLY not detectable, unless the universe is beginning to fail. However, it provides a primary source of protection, and the loss of 10% of the storage often doesn't hurt much, given the size of modern universes.
The universe only seems to have a side preference because it wants to look its best when we observe it. This is pretty common behavior for a lot of stars.
I have always thought the CMB looked like it has a sort of curved “stream” in it. The picture has a super void in the bottom right, and somewhat in the top left too. Definitely makes you think that the universe did have a “spin” to it from the earliest instances.
Bottom right? for a moment let's call 360x360 the furthest point B and R, where is your 0x0 and does this hold true for most places if you change it?
If the wavelength of starlight is red-shifted, then the polarization rates will be red-shifted as well. Our local spin will manifest as a rotating polarization relative to the deep field, and it would not be symmetric. This would, however, be very minor.
Very interesting.
If the light we can detect is polarized left, what if the dark matter/energy is polarized right?
Too simple, nothing is that easy.. but it's so weird it makes you think.
Does 'Dark Pull' have any bearing on this?
After watching:
Would this help create physical time travel?
No.
But, in my opinion, this may be the groundbreaking work to communicate with the past.
I hope I do not appear insane Mr. Petrov.
Given the preference (here) of matter to anti-matter, it seems peculiar to have ever believed the universe wasn’t an irregular fundament.
Could the basic shape of the universe be that of a vortex? There seems to be this tendency for everything that moves eventually to travel in spiral. Just as the movement of air and ocean currents on earth are shaped by the earth's rotation, could the movement of objects everywhere be shaped by cosmic rotation?
That would account for a lack of universal symmetry.
i called it! the universe is one big particle!!!
The big bang was just a collision in some other civilizations particle accelerator
The Universe is Scalable Aether, Casimir Effect Universe.
As always, great vid
such a wonderful person
maybe we live on the event horizon of a black hole and everything we see is effected by that.
It would certainly make space-time appear as though everything is expanding
Could this be a cosmic coriolis effect?
This sounds of monumental importance.
correction: Gamma rays cannot be reflected due to their incredibly small wavelengths allowing them to bypass any material known to man at the moment.
Great vid, Anton. Do you know there is a Gravitational Wave Events app on ITunes? It’s information shared by the LIGO/Virgo and will give a sounder when these labs pick up a shift in the gravitational waves that pass though through Earth. I’m not associated in any way with the app, I just thought when a notification happens, you could discuss it on your channel. I’d like to hear your analysis of the event. Thanks for your time a again, great channel!
aren't there also left and right "handed" molecules and other smaller objects?
it did look a little odd, your head normally tilts right, your left.
didnt realise why till you pointed it out, thought it was just bcause you were on the wrong side of the screen :-)
Doesn't the universe's preference for matter over antimatter also prove that it is asymmetrical?
It does not _prove_ , it hints that something must be asymmetrical. They are still looking around for what it actually is...
99.2% certain might not be enough for science but it sounds pretty convincing to me.
I'd be willing to bet most of my wordly wealth on it anyway.
----> The Standard Model of the Universe is based on the unified field theory (aka the Big Bang)... the breaking of absolute symmetry. Perhaps the discrepancies in polarization has something to do with the other forces and the formation of quarks. At some point the weak force separated from the electro-weak force.
I said this! About the universe could be left sided! In Anton,s comments about a year ago!
And I got trolled in the comments, Go figure!
Gut instinct first, then prove. I applaud you.☺️
Sure pal...sure you did...
As shown on a brick wall. E=Mc^2. Next to the equation was written "C-, nice equation Einstein, next time show your work"
I'm pretty sure Trump is claiming the same, doesn't make him a genius.
And Rob gets trolled again, poor Rob