Quantum Field Theory Lecture 1: Klein-Gordon Equation for a Single Particle
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 มิ.ย. 2024
- Lecture 1 covers the motivation behind developing a Quantum Field Theory, some of the concepts needed to understand it, such as lorentz invariance and four-vectors. Then I introduce the Klein-Gordon equation and explain its problems
If you enjoy my content, please consider checking out my Patreon!
www.patreon.com/nickheumann
Also, consider subscribing and following me on my socials!
twitter: nickheumann
Instagram: nicolasheumann
twitch: www.twitch.tv/nickheumann
My name is Nick Heumann, I am a recently graduated physicist. I love to teach physics, so I decided to give TH-cam a try. English is not my first language, but I hope that you can understand me well enough regardless.
▬ Contents of this video ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
00:00 Concepts you need to understand
19:20 Deriving the Klein-Gordon Equation
25:40 Finding the Energy values ofr the K-G equation
34:48 Finding the Probability current and density for KG
59:25 Please Support me on my Patreon!
This is kind of "Go Along" tutorial, unlike most of the "Go Alone" tutorials. It gives the proper way of learning mathematically rich topic. Very nice.
once you understand the Schrodinger equation and its motivations the Klein-Gordon equation arises naturally out of the Einstein energy-momentum relation. Very excited to go through all of your videos on QFT!
Thanks so much for such an insightful and thorough playlist on QFT!
Completed the first lecture just now after a day (I know, a slow start). You deserve the sub, Nick. Brilliant explanation. Thank you!
I am pretty sure you were wrong with doing {\partial_mu} -> {\partial_t +
abla} and {\partial^mu} -> {\partial_t -
abla}. The cross terms happen to cancel out but they should not have been there in the first place.
Thanks Nick. You're explanations are very clear and intuitive. Thanks very much for producing these videos. We look forward to string theory!
Your approch is so spot on and so welcomed; and your English is as good as a native speaker (as a native speaker, I know the difference.)
thank you for the kind comment!
I'm so grateful ❤ to have yr lecs
Very nice. Your way of explaining is very thoughtful and useful for beginners like me
Same
Great course! If you do a course on the entire QFT, a full year one, I will definitely sub your Patreon!
Thank you so much
Great lecture.
Very interesting! 🌿
Just I wish we could have your lecture note ...
57:41
I think for each sign in exponential in phi, we will get two values of rho, one positive value and other one negative. As "E" can be both positive and negative.
Nice video for QFT beginners..
Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree.
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
=====================
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length )
The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge.
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.
sir how can we download this slides for making notes
Im starting this today.
same here
So those two partial derivatives beside each other, they don't form a second derivative? Why did I think there were second derivatives in there? Isn't the second derivative proportional to value what gives you wave solutions?
respect
natural units: where we have C we don't C it.
good one🤣
Is there any textbook that is followed here?
Is this real ! I am happy go and never stop
At 24:33 why do you get rid of the minus sign that was there earlier? Did you mean to define the D'almbertian as -p_u p^u ?
Hi!
I Simply wrote that term on the other side of the equation, so I added it to both sides. It might be confusing because I kept it on the same side, but that is what I did
33:53
At that time Klein Gordon was unable to explain the significance of negative energy? Is it like that?
Negative energies do not make physical sense, and are a sign of the failure of the theory. However, it could be interpreted as explained in the lecture
🎉🎉🎉
29:22 that was a bit late, I was very confused for some minutes.
i am assuming you are following peskin and schroeder ?
I will be using a mix of Ashok Das, Peskin and my own notes
The text for this course is peskin qft, right?
yes, a mix of Peskin, Ashok Das, and my lecture notes
I'm not understand that integration at 37:20
That integration by parts is a very common technique. I suggest you take the derivative d__mu (the second line written in yellow color) so that you see that it is equivalent to what is on the first yellow line. Thus, you can see that you get the 2nd line by integrating the first. I hope this helps!
Thanks I want to ask if can u do a video about eightfold way for classification of particules
and you missed a conjugate 40:06