Boeing 777 vs IL96 vs Airbus 340

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
  • Best of my clips of these three classics heavies.
    Visit my blog:
    www.javrullan.e...
    www.javrullan.e...

ความคิดเห็น • 411

  • @TheSwanlake2009
    @TheSwanlake2009 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I think having the largest interior room space is the biggest Advantage which means the IL-96 wins.

  • @shahrukhsaleemzuberi419
    @shahrukhsaleemzuberi419 5 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    IL 96 its a legend

  • @Hhutuber
    @Hhutuber 8 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    In my opinion, the A340-500/600 is one of the most elegant looking commercial aircraft ever build but it's not competitive anymore when it comes to fuel consumption. The A350 is a great replacement, though.

    • @trainman6447
      @trainman6447 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      No 777

    • @nikolayrossolko3918
      @nikolayrossolko3918 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Идиот? ТУ-160 respect

    • @theplanespotterguy
      @theplanespotterguy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Hhutuber Yes, the A340 is one of my favorite aircrafts...

    • @aeronmics
      @aeronmics 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hhutuber I like its three rear landing gear, although I'm a Boeing fan :)

    • @warsoviann5674
      @warsoviann5674 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Hhutuber but it's dying now

  • @cameronsamayoa2829
    @cameronsamayoa2829 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The IL 96 reminds me of a more beautiful version of a 707 and A340.....

  • @jayvanasten6238
    @jayvanasten6238 8 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    I Love the Il-96-300 most.....................Great Aircraft in every way.....

    • @trainman6447
      @trainman6447 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      No 777

    • @airplane4012
      @airplane4012 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Train Man definitely

    • @3jiouttp9ihuk66
      @3jiouttp9ihuk66 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Train Man 777 is worse.

    • @tionstav5799
      @tionstav5799 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I do feel that IL-96 is the underdog and is usually ignored here in the US because it is russian built. however the IL-96 is probably a great plane that should not be marked down because of its origin.

    • @TonymanCS
      @TonymanCS 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Il-96 is a dead meat. Even Russian give it no future other than a few planes produced per 2-3 years. It loose in economical comparison against A340, let alone T7.

  • @GromzaV
    @GromzaV 8 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Sorry I'm not writing in English. But! IL-96 will again produce, but with a new engine, which will make it much luchshe competitors. And the history of the operation - IL-96 - is the safest aircraft ever.

    • @shitpostgaming7396
      @shitpostgaming7396 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +GromzaV Well I wouldnt say it's the safest. The numbers are currently too small to tell.

    • @AviationNut
      @AviationNut 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      There was only 30 il-96 built so how can you even compare to aircraft where thousands have been built. 30 aircraft since 1993 is nothing compared to 777 which started same year as il-96 and has built 1,420 Boeings 777's. The il-96 is crap no airlines want it, the only airlines buying it is The country where it was built(Russia) and countries that can't buy western aircraft. Do you think if il-96 would be such a great aircraft as you think only 30 would of been sold over 23 years. Il-96 is an overweight piece of metal that burns 35 to 50% more fuel then western built aircraft of the same size, no airlines want it unless they have no other choice. Aeroflot didn't even want anymore il-96's but Putin forced them to buy more Russian made planes. Why do you think even all Russian airlines buy western aircraft?.

    • @lukStSerb
      @lukStSerb 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Secret Benny ..why so rude, simpleton?

    • @bobbear4437
      @bobbear4437 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      why so touchy, dudes telling it like it is!

    • @IlyaSmirnov1980
      @IlyaSmirnov1980 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Dear, IL-96 a great airplane, you just it did not fly, Russia now takes the step of operating the test engine PD-14 which is already stare even Airbus and Boeing because it gives an impressive performance at the
      testing stage and at the same power reduces consumption 12-15% fuel. When the engine is tested under various load conditions, ranging from aviation and ending turbines in power plants and gas pumping stations.
      The problem of IL-96 is that it closed the market in the west and because the logistics in terms of parts and components is very weak, it is the main advantage of Boeing and Aerobas.
      Russia has created a new Superjet 100 plane which for several years was sold on all continents, is now preparing a new Russian aircraft MS-21 (mid-range), under which even developed its own engine, wait, time
      will pass and we will build a new wide-body aircraft.
      Of course, Russia has lost a lot in the 90s when there was disruption of the country, but we will rise again. All the same, we have built the first civilian supersonic aircraft (Tu-144), and first flew into space. We just pride will not allow Russian to be at the end of the list of aircraft manufacturers.
      As for IL-96, he flew to 3 years earlier than 777.

  • @t.khattabi7727
    @t.khattabi7727 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Boeing 777 all the way, those GE90s are more powerful and fuel efficient than those other quad-jets. But the IL-96 is definitely the coolest looking one.

    • @gasviation9077
      @gasviation9077 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      definitely an airbus hater

    • @vladimirvladimirovichputin4960
      @vladimirvladimirovichputin4960 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gasviation9077 ? i also find the il96 prettier for being wider, and it doesn't take away from the fact that i like the a340 and i have hundreds of hours flown in it in the simulator lol

  • @MultiMILLER100
    @MultiMILLER100 8 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    Ил 96 красавец

    • @amirhamja1473
      @amirhamja1473 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes Great Russia salute Russia

  • @ibnrawandi2713
    @ibnrawandi2713 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can only judge from the looks and Il 96 is the best, the four engines give it an awesome look.

  • @lightswift3217
    @lightswift3217 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Boeing 777 a thousand times! Very Comfortable and takes off like a Rocket!! 👍🏻

  • @lioii
    @lioii 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Having flown on all 3 types my favourite was the Ilyushin Il-96 despite it having no in-flight entertainment...

  • @yariksaveliev9032
    @yariksaveliev9032 8 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    Ил-96 THE BEST!

    • @aliguseynov4780
      @aliguseynov4780 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      не думаю

    • @yariksaveliev9032
      @yariksaveliev9032 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ***** 777 is beautiful plane. But IL-96 is better)))))))

    • @bobbear4437
      @bobbear4437 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Better? A joke right?

    • @yariksaveliev9032
      @yariksaveliev9032 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bob Bear google translate:)

    • @e30kitty
      @e30kitty 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Western TV washed u. You think russia is poor low and a bad country but: Who is bombing thw whole world for the last 50 years? We have 3 amerikan military bases in germany but no russian base, why? I also can't see that north korea hase a base here, syria? nope! iran? nope, just the U ASS to the fucking A

  • @cezarfarias9245
    @cezarfarias9245 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    IL 96-300 great aircraft, the best and beautiful

  • @user-ks9qg2kn9k
    @user-ks9qg2kn9k 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Мне они все нравятся!

  • @nomebear
    @nomebear 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Отличным сравнением был бы Ил-86 из-за его образцового показателя безопасности.
    A great comparison would be the IL-86 because of it's exemplary safety record.

  • @REPOMAN24722
    @REPOMAN24722 8 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    IL-96 is the best

    • @REPOMAN24722
      @REPOMAN24722 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The prettiest planes ever made is the l1011 and the md11 the 777 looks like any other plane, and they use the 777 for range the il96 was never meant for that range

    • @REPOMAN24722
      @REPOMAN24722 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      EpiDemic117
      While I don't like airbus I like the a340-600 better than the 777. My third favorite plane is the il-62, favorite supersonic tu144.
      Im not a fan of Boeing however I do like the 727, but even then I like the trident better.

    • @REPOMAN24722
      @REPOMAN24722 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have been in a malaysian airlines 777 and a Singapore airlines 777, i go on my first a340 in May with swissair, from what i heard the a340 is more reliable and if i go accross the ocean i want 4 engines not 2 lol, I have also heard that the a340 is better for the passenger comfort.

    • @REPOMAN24722
      @REPOMAN24722 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      soaringtractor
      Well according to facts the a340 is a safer aircraft, 0 Fatalities vs 514, airbus as a whole make safer planes..

    • @smittywerbenjaegermanjense2350
      @smittywerbenjaegermanjense2350 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      IL-96 sucks ass, which is why no major airline even uses it.

  • @airtexaco
    @airtexaco 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    They're all beautiful airplanes, thanks for posting =)

  • @Bio54633
    @Bio54633 7 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    The Ilyushin for me, thank you..

  • @user-mm7zs7jd4d
    @user-mm7zs7jd4d 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ofcourse 1.IL-96. 2.Airbus. 3.Boeng.

  • @Goryar
    @Goryar 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A340 impressed, but one of this, only one is the best, and the global merchant says 777

  • @raviechandranmariappan2325
    @raviechandranmariappan2325 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IL-96 for me a beautiful bird, it is not popular because: Russian, 4 noisy engines (higher maintenance), high fuel consumption. Can't wait for the new gen IL-96 which is in the pipeline.

  • @aviator7675
    @aviator7675 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    IL-96

  • @gangster3591
    @gangster3591 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The Airbus and Ilyushin are not in the same league as the superior B777.
    So pointless comparison

  • @guerry4690
    @guerry4690 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank-you, Javier. I have bookmarked your TH-cam page. I love to watch takeoffs and landings of airliners. Personally, I find the 4 engine giants to be the most aesthetically pleasing. Before we had to heighten our airport
    security, I would arrive at the airport hours before my flight just to stand on the observation deck. I did not care
    about the weather conditions. I just enjoyed to view all of the airport’s activities. Of all the airports I frequented, Philadelphia and Chicago (O’Hare) had my favorite observation decks.

  • @jlaviation6207
    @jlaviation6207 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    IL-96 & A340 Are my favorites

  • @RAK21
    @RAK21 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    the winner is B-777

  • @adenilson727
    @adenilson727 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This Boeing 777-20ER, N744AM, before the Varig, PP-VRA

  • @sbaviationcol
    @sbaviationcol 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The Il-96 is cool, but the -400 & -400T variants are more beautiful (it seems like an A340-300)

    • @asedky
      @asedky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the a 340 seems like the il 96.
      the il 96 maiden flight was end of the 1989s', whereas the a 340 was beginning of the 1990s'

  • @jamiescarper3525
    @jamiescarper3525 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nothing beats the sound of the Trent 500

  • @jeffandlucywilliams5082
    @jeffandlucywilliams5082 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is labeled Boeing 778 vs Il96 vs airbus, but there is nothing about the pros or cons of any of these 3 aircraft! Just a bunch of smooth landings of these! If you’re going to do an aircraft vs aircraft video, you at least need to include some didactic commentary to make such points!

  • @Gerardius
    @Gerardius 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Precioso el A340/600 de Iberia y el 777 de Aeroméxico

  • @Fuerte-Claro
    @Fuerte-Claro 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IL-96 Next Tu 214

  • @morbiddesire100
    @morbiddesire100 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Iberia's a340 used almost the whole runway to takeoff, just notice the threshold stripes reflecting on its belly... Il-96 all the way, though.

  • @Cody-hw3bt
    @Cody-hw3bt 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like all of them but I would choose the 777 and IL-96.

  • @flyandsmile3745
    @flyandsmile3745 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Everyone can have their own opinion. Still, I hate the others Airbus manufacturer there before there was Airbus and the Concorde. So I like Ilyushin, Boeing, Tupolev, Yakolev, Bombardier, Embraer, Sukhoi, McDonnell Douglas, Fokker, Antonov, Lockheed, Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation, British Aerospace, de Havilland, Sud Aviation, Vickers Armstrongs, Beechcraft and still others.

  • @oliviernales9272
    @oliviernales9272 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    B777 and A340
    Are the best

  • @pepito060666
    @pepito060666 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I choose Boeing 777 it is the most advance , modern and fuel efficiency.

    • @koichiarts
      @koichiarts 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ... And most secure and stable.

  • @marcelosaavedra562
    @marcelosaavedra562 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Con 2 turbinas de seguro debe ser mucho más económico el B777 de los tres, y definitivamente lo hace más competitivo, superior

  • @dancoblis1420
    @dancoblis1420 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    777 is the best, then 340. Il 96 is just a flying Volga car and is good just for Rusian.

  • @DanielSander
    @DanielSander 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another Top Class Video Bud :-)

  • @user-cz8xk1oc3u
    @user-cz8xk1oc3u 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Главное все летают, но с ИЛом не помню не одну катастрофу...

    • @estebankedrin9334
      @estebankedrin9334 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      С 96 её и не было, было с другими

  • @lolblyatcs5856
    @lolblyatcs5856 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Ил-96 wins

  • @Fardun007
    @Fardun007 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It is hard to distinguish the IL-96 300 from the Airbus A340-600 as both have 4 engines and winglets and single deck fuselage.

    • @raynec7099
      @raynec7099 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      VisualX IL96 winglets are longer, engines too? if u are sharp enough, the length of the planr

    • @IlyaSmirnov1980
      @IlyaSmirnov1980 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      In IL-96 storey fuselage. There is the possibility of boarding ladders through a side door as IL-86. On the ground floor there are luggage otleleniya, wardrobes and kitchen.
      In the A-340 there are no breaks in the auxiliary ailerons flaps 2 and 3 engines. Fyuzlyazh IL-96 has a diameter of 6.08 meters, and A-340 - 5.64 m.

    • @Fardun007
      @Fardun007 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      DailyRayne Gaming And Others
      Unless I am watching from close enough.

    • @stovebolt8724
      @stovebolt8724 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      VisualX the il-96 really dosen’t need 4 engines.. it looks way smaller than the a330, but the engines on the il-96 look pretty tiny

  • @taulantmances9888
    @taulantmances9888 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is hard to choose because:
    Boeing and Airbus are safe and efficient planes but they are expensive very expensive
    On the other hand we have Il96-400 a beautiful large plane with not many hours of flights (So we don't really know how safe they are)
    But is a big BUT ,Il 96-400m are so much more affordable than Boeing or Airbus.
    And money is everything in business.
    If I was an airliner CEO I would consider buying Il96-400m

  • @mikealvarez8250
    @mikealvarez8250 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 777 is the safest and most realiable of all, even better than the A340. Anyhow, you can't just compare 1,657 777 built versus 27 Il-96, the billions of miles flew on the 777 is unmatched by any Russian aircraft.

    • @MrChpinoza
      @MrChpinoza 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But the IL-96 is a safe aircraft that fly well.
      This is the official plane of the President of Russia.

    • @gasviation9077
      @gasviation9077 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      777 is the safest? check the safety record mate

  • @Chris58851
    @Chris58851 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unfortunately there is no Boeing 777-300ER in this video, she is the best widebody jetliner every built. Until now there is 432 Boeing 777-300ER delivered and one of them serves in Russian Aeroflot Airlines.

    • @JavierRullanRuano
      @JavierRullanRuano  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      In this video th-cam.com/video/d6-MNgyrkjQ/w-d-xo.html you can see the Boeing 777-300ER vs. the new Airbus A350-1000 XWB

  • @AbdulHafeez-cq6oo
    @AbdulHafeez-cq6oo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    apparently L-96 seems safest

  • @iamt_tl
    @iamt_tl 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    haven't flown in any russian jets, how it compares to boeing and ab?

  • @billarmstrong8224
    @billarmstrong8224 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Yeah!Boeing 777 all the way!

  • @PauloSergioMDC
    @PauloSergioMDC 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Should have included the 777-300ER if you're going to have the A340-600 here

  • @rsattahip
    @rsattahip 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    4 engine planes are essentially obsolete, even Aeroflot flies the 777. The A340 is a dog of a plane that even 2nd rate airlines like Thai have retired at less than 10 years old because they cost too much to operate. The IL 96 is also a white elephant.

  • @dakkerd8471
    @dakkerd8471 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    man the livery on that last 777 was looking dirty af

  • @Giratina1999
    @Giratina1999 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why doesn’t anyone ever order the IL96? It’s a beautiful plane, and I’m a die hard Boeing supporter! Well I also think the A340 is pretty great too

  • @WelshTCC1
    @WelshTCC1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    IL-96

  • @-SUM1-
    @-SUM1- 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    IL-96 is just cooler. It just is.

  • @10kunegunda
    @10kunegunda 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good, cool video, Javier. I give "thumbs" up.

    • @JavierRullanRuano
      @JavierRullanRuano  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** Thanks, I'm glad you like the video.

  • @thorsty70
    @thorsty70 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Every airplane, you can walk away after the landing, is a very good plane :-) But T7 has still no competition. T/O performance, safety record, range (especially 200LR). No doubts.

  • @crohom2807
    @crohom2807 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ll-96

  • @ulfmalmqvist2528
    @ulfmalmqvist2528 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    One modern plane vs two retro planes.

  • @LLANTERO
    @LLANTERO 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    For me.. The best Airplane its the IL-96.. However.. The A340 and B777 are super planes!!..

  • @fortsix1020
    @fortsix1020 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm an airbus lover. But if I have to choose between those aircraft, I would go for 777

  • @hani.mohammadi
    @hani.mohammadi 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice video.
    but wasn't better to compare B777 vs A350 ?

  • @michealbeers777
    @michealbeers777 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Boeing 777 is used by more airlines than any other plane, it's also the safest. Airbus 340 doesn't come close,.....IL96 doesn't have a prayer.

  • @MaxScooterfan
    @MaxScooterfan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like them all!
    especially Ilyshin! ))))

  • @marxmann3564
    @marxmann3564 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    the 96 looks like a cross breed between the 777 and the 340 because of the wide body of the 777 and the sleek looking nose and wings of the 340=il96 baby is born

  • @sergiobugaev1735
    @sergiobugaev1735 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    B 777 до сих пор производят.
    А 340 уже нет
    Ил 96 крайне малыми партиями
    Мораль думайте сами

  • @aflyingchapati4395
    @aflyingchapati4395 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:25 where is that?

  • @yencyriveron492
    @yencyriveron492 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tres ejemplares hermosos y buenos .pero me quedo con il96.para mi el mejor.4 motores mejor q 2 .

  • @billarmstrong8224
    @billarmstrong8224 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Boeing 777 is the best follow by Ilyushin-96 and last but not least,our Mr.Airbus A340

  • @funkyuop6207
    @funkyuop6207 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Different Airports?

  • @anand9606
    @anand9606 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An american would say , Boeing is best
    ..
    French guy would say ,
    airbus is best..
    Russian guy would say ,
    Ilyushin is Best..
    but those craps and shits would never say that , how much of the profits had been shared with them. Supporting a company for it's manufacturing country is just like tasting ur own shit .. keep doing

  • @javierbarrientos9927
    @javierbarrientos9927 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    All fine but Airbus 340 best passenger/mile and cost/benefit ratios.

  • @robsten5387
    @robsten5387 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ilyushin 96 with 4 engines is obsolete.

    • @jacoc.2183
      @jacoc.2183 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      And Aribus A340

  • @newslabeveryday5986
    @newslabeveryday5986 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh I get it Ilyushin copied the blue print of airbus and just fix a bit of things so this is indeed the soviet airbus A340

  • @OlegKartsev
    @OlegKartsev 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    US and European initiate low to kick out russians with IL-96 from international airlines with four engine. But after Airbus 340 was change stupid rules back. Russian happy to used this plain again!

  • @user-kn3hs3ql6i
    @user-kn3hs3ql6i 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    На всех летал, каждый понравился по своему

  • @aeronmics
    @aeronmics 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    No one can beat the legendary 777

  • @michaelschumacher3701
    @michaelschumacher3701 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A340 and A320
    777 and 737
    Il-96 and Il-62

  • @wiktorjaciow9815
    @wiktorjaciow9815 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im flying a a340-300 to seychelles in a month!!!

  • @hectorzambrano4092
    @hectorzambrano4092 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    777 wins for its efficiency, but the A340 and IL96 wins for the design and looks and engine sound (not noise level). TRUST ME, THE 777 LOOKS HORRIBLE ON THE OUTSIDE. NOSE LOOKS UGLY, ENGINES SOUND NOTHING LIKE HOW AN AIRPLANE SHOULD SOUND LIKE, ETC.

  • @arturl6937
    @arturl6937 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    A340 and Il96 look like a big hunting eagle

  • @cheesewaffle8421
    @cheesewaffle8421 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    777 for days. The a340 is good too but the il96 is just lame. It's unsafe loud and inefficient. There's a reason why not many airlines use them

  • @nikolayrossolko3918
    @nikolayrossolko3918 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ребятишки,а Белый Лебедь не красавица???ТУ-160

  • @adrianquialv3021
    @adrianquialv3021 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The winner is the Boeing 777 the others are copies of that model airplane

  • @sdevilx1074
    @sdevilx1074 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    See I personally think the il96 is cooler since it's more rare but the 777 is the more efficient and more popular

  • @elvisalves7043
    @elvisalves7043 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    IL-96 and A-340 are the best e beatiful

  • @anavgeekspassion5727
    @anavgeekspassion5727 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    777 by far! A340 and the Ilyushin are both legends tho.

  • @austenmaximillian9086
    @austenmaximillian9086 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love all 3 but 777 for da life

  • @bobbypaluga4346
    @bobbypaluga4346 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good grief 4 engines vs 2 engines, the 777 wins easily, anyone want to talk sales figures? There have been 15 IL-96’s built, 4 are in VIP service with 3the Putin government, the 340 is being taken out of service because of its high fuel consumption

  • @frostscout7583
    @frostscout7583 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ил-96-400 самая лучшая модификация этого самолёта, потому, что есть ещё грузовая версия.

  • @amirhamja1473
    @amirhamja1473 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes il 96 300 and il 96 400 its a legends

  • @sergeykhabarov8408
    @sergeykhabarov8408 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    я летал только на ил 96 подскажите кто летал на других больших самолетах,какой вам больше всего понравился и чем?

    • @IlyaSmirnov1980
      @IlyaSmirnov1980 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      На всех летал. Ил-96 понравился больше всех - родное! А-340 садится очень жестко, 90% посадок на автомате и этот автомат в планету бьет машину так, словно ее ненавидит.

    • @sergeykhabarov8408
      @sergeykhabarov8408 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Спасибо ! Наверное у 340 го быстрая скорость посадочная

    • @sergeykhabarov8408
      @sergeykhabarov8408 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      А ил 96 очень приятный я летел из шереметьево в Тайланд аэропорт утопауо... как то так называется... но это не важно,Главнное, что туда и назад летел ил 96 м аэрофлот в 2004 году в январе в это время примерно как раз .Так вот. Могу сказать, что посадка очень мягенькая .А когда я садился в этот самолет я не ожидал, что это такая огромная птичка!!! Просто не вероятно огромная.И я не понимал как же она летает )

    • @bobrik63
      @bobrik63 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Какой самолёт лучше, говорит статистика востребованности. Родное - серьёзный, конечно, аргумент, но этих родных - около 30 штук сделано.

    • @user-fx6ny7fq7v
      @user-fx6ny7fq7v 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      статистика востребованности напрямую зависит от военных баз сша и натренерованности местных властей лизать очко исключительным

  • @habitantdelempiretresdemoc3693
    @habitantdelempiretresdemoc3693 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Airbus a340 for me

  • @edem3777
    @edem3777 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Красивые птички!

  • @felogarcia8992
    @felogarcia8992 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How you gonna compare an il 96 with a Boeing those il are like everything made in Russia is only buy by third world countries so please make your home work guy there's a bunch of airlines on the former USSR that use airbus and Boeing of second hand

  • @MrPuc777
    @MrPuc777 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    777 best by far!

  • @jacoc.2183
    @jacoc.2183 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Boeing 777/300ER Simply the best.

  • @jafarhon
    @jafarhon 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    They all sexy, triple 7 also best of the best, il96 looks awesome, never had a chance to fly in one, but i bet if Putin uses il96 i think its one of the best. Anytime i see airplane its amazes me

  • @philiproseel3506
    @philiproseel3506 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Boeing and Airbus make more eye-pleasing airplanes and of better quality. Western aircraft manufacturing technology has always been leaps ahead of Russian technology, but they seem to be catching up. Slowly.

    • @IlyaSmirnov1980
      @IlyaSmirnov1980 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's so funny to hear your statements.
      Tell me, why do Americans and the whole world use An-124 and An-225 Mriya for transportation of bulky goods? Probably because the "advanced technology" could not create such planes?
      And why do Americans order the Mi-26 in Afghanistan to take out their downed helicopters? ))))))))
      Why does the B-1B stand on the "garbage can" and the Tu-160 still flies and is in demand?
      Russia has created an aircraft MS-21 which by fuel efficiency by 8% bypasses A-320NEO and 737MAX. At the same time, it is the first aircraft of this size in the world with a fully composed wing.
      Let's tell us more about the lagging Russian technologies))))))

    • @philiproseel3506
      @philiproseel3506 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because we can't be bothered to create aircraft that only 10% of the world needs. Ever hear of the C-5? Yeah, we can make them. Again, no need to build a massive helicopter to be used one day a year, if that. You're comparing an aircraft that's been around 5 minutes against two types that have been used for generations and are proven winners. Just because you FINALLY might be catching up with the West, somewhat, doesn't mean Western carriers will dump Boeing and Airbus to buy Russian. LOL...amazing!

    • @mennie8479
      @mennie8479 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      mainstream sux why are almost all Americans so defensive about comparing things with russia?

    • @AA-tz2bm
      @AA-tz2bm 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@philiproseel3506 Ikr, the il-96 carried less pax and had less range than the 777-200ER at the time and yet it burned more fuel than the 777-200ER ? like wtf 😂.

  • @Gabriel-pi1vf
    @Gabriel-pi1vf 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    the IL 96 is apparently a quite nice aircraft but the most powerfull aircraft in the world is the 777 nothing can beat the power of ge90's !