Revised Penal Code (RPC) Book 1. Justifying Circumstances. Article 11. Part 2

Hello everyone!
This is Part 2 of the Justifying Circumstances under Article 11 of the RPC.
I am sorry for the delay; it has been busy these past few weeks.
Thank you and good luck!
Sources. RPC by Luis Reyes, Laws and Jurisprudence

[@harveypadrigano5101]

Thank you for the very comprehensive discussion Atty! You're the best!

[@sheriffjohnstone28]

Great timing! Always looking forward to watch and hear crystal clear explanation! Excellent work Lodi!!

[@zekie106]

ito masarap pakinggan habang nasa biyahe... I remember almost everything I've studied and it helps me get ready for recitations in class
thanks a lot for these free lectures 🙏

[@kampihanay2380]

Thanks! Looking forward for more uploads.

[@DIYniBert96]

Bukas ang first ever exam ko in my law school journey. Sobrang thankful ako sa channel nyo Sir sa totoo lang, as a workiing student na sobrang nag aadjust palang kung papaano isisingit ang pagbabasa sa napakadaming workloads at other problems pa na dala nitong pandemya. Sana masarap ulam nyo lagi, Atty! More power!

[@jirahzekiaabalos7376]

Thank you so much, Atty! Waiting for exempting circumstances po

[@najebamboloto1009]

Thank you for this! Waiting for mitigating and aggravating circumstances ❤

[@lodireks2977]

Grabe nakapa solid mag lecture ni atty ❤️ sana masundan pa ng madami

[@julyannmugot6649]

Thank you Atty! ❤

[@jontv998]

Thanks Atty. It really helps me.❤

[@conqueror4937]

Thank you Atty.❤️

[@marilynbernal1504]

Thank you so much Atty. It helps me a lot... The best po👍

[@crissanchez6646]

Thank you so much! Very helpful.

[@RoliFrancisLWakit]

Great presentation..looking forward for more of it Atty.

[@egosumpulcher1]

Tnx for the kind words sir.. im doing my best medyo busy lng tlga sa work kaya napapatagal pagproduce ng next videos..

[@ChristianSLopez]

Hope more videos to come. Thanks Atty

[@rosemarienopia5706]

Thank you atty. ❤❤

[@earlknov6721]

Thank you po sir napaka galing nyo po mag lecture❤️❤️
Malaking bagay po saamin ito godbless po and more vids p po sir🙏🙏

[@solfajardo4363]

Thank you sir pag explain ng mas klaro i hope madami pa pong topic ang magawa nyo thank you sir

[@RA-go3lz]

Thank you♥️♥️💪

[@noreenjavier2149]

the best!!

[@sherwinimportante6291]

Thank you sir ging niyo po magturo.

[@pauladlaimendoza8746]

Thankyou po atty. reporting ko po bukas at mas napaintindi nyo po saakin💖

[@kennadelosreyes1765]

Atty. JP, salamat po!

[@alfredtingkingco]

Thank you po atty. 1st year po sa law school from samar

[@juliusabella7953]

Thank you sir atty.😁😁

[@arnoldcabral3097]

Thankyou sir!

[@rowelltolentino6169]

On a scale from 1 to 10, you're an 11 Atty. Keep it Up😊

[@vendermonica769]

Thank you so much po.

[@MarkAnthonySy]

Atty. JP, comment po doon sa part na need amputate ng surgeon ung patient. Dapat nainform ng surgeon ung magulang before or after the surgery na need putulin. Nadala si Jejemon sa ER, it means may kasama siya. Part of ethical practice ng doctors na inform ang kasama nung patient. Unless kung walang kasama, doon niya pde apply ung discretion. Ito po ay naisip ko lang. Correct me if I am wrong po. Sobrang helpful po ng iyong mga videos.😊 First year Law Student po ako sa Manila Law College.

[@metoscacatian8749]

Thanks po Atty

[@leordnersie2871]

Obedience to an order...

[@jcbdialon8516]

salamat po atty..sana po mayroon din po sa civil code

[@scaramouchesslave1508]

thank you so much poooo

[@jimdarieljadlong4950]

thnks po atty.

[@mmwkoh]

Thank you Atty for this. Nung una ko po nalaman yung 3 requirements for valid self defense akala ko illegal yung pag baril sa magnanakaw sa loob ng property mo. Based po sa explanation nyo, is self defense considered if the robber was killed with a gun within your property provided that:
a. The robber was shot without him knowing you have a gun (hindi na tinawag yung attention nya, binaril na lang bigla)
b. There is clear proof of robbery (already in possession of your belongings)
c. A single, non fatal shot was given but the robber succumbed to injuries

[@zekie106]

lol hindi ata pasok
1) Unlawful aggression ❌ nagnanakaw lang, so walang unlawful aggression to person
2) Reasonable necessity ❌
Binaril mo lang without warning, and he wasn't even threatening your life
3) Lack of provocation ✅
2 of the 3 elements were not present. Therefore, this act is not a justifying circumstance... (correct me if I'm wrong)

[@johnlynmedios6493]

Aweee. Sana may article 12-13 din.🥺🙏🏻

[@jmsempio6977]

Thanks sir

[@yeshuagl6922]

No problem if judges and prosecutors follow the law. But most often they don't. Depending on who their "client" they twist the law or resort to technicalities.

[@peterpiper5300]

can you also do lectures on consti? you might explain things better than my prof.

[@nic_chan8572]

Good evening atty article 12 nmn po gusto ko yong mga example mo po attt and its also understandable po😊

[@bench2760]

💜💜💜💜

[@zerotwo4653]

Salamt po makaktulong po sakin as crim stud😀

[@generosojrmanalo3294]

Galing

[@michaelkanegoh7004]

Sir attorney sino po ang sasagot ng civil liability sa unang example mo po binigay(injury to persons)sa state of necessity, Salamat po sir

[@nicoletilloeucogco6841]

💕

[@ariannealibio2245]

hulog ka ng langit atty!!!

[@jiminoryeanmatias317]

Thankyou Atty. baka pwede po magrequest article 12 naman po ng RPC

[@Jakdksk2024]

Atty ask lng po. Dba pag verbal lng po d po yon unlawful aggression. D mo sya pwde saktan

[@educatedidiot533]

sa defense of strangers
pag may history kayo ni attacker, di mo na ba matutulungan si stranger?

[@egosumpulcher1]

Pwede pa rin.. as long as hindi dahil doon sa history niyo 🙂

[@jhmotovlogs7010]

Atty. Sana po gumawa kapa po ng video.magaling po kayu mag turo mas natutu pa ako sa inyo kesa sa guro namen

[@Jerome-iwnl]

Atty, in the case where there is a thief that breaks into my house, is this considered an attack and am I legally allowed to defend myself using a firearm to stop the threat?
In this second scenario, if someone breaks into my home and they are holding a weapon. Am I legally allowed to defend myself using a firearm to stop the threat?
Third scenario: Multiple people break into my house without weapons and are refusing to leave even after confrtonted. Am I allowed legally to defend myself using a firearm to stop the threats to me and my family?

[@MarkAnthonySy]

Case #1: Illegal trespass to dwelling pa lang. Unless makita na may bitbit silang gamit mo na aktong nagnanakaw, doon ang thief. Ilan sila? Kung marami at may weapon sila, allowed to defend yourself with a firearm. Need mas buo details kasi kung kulang ang facts, di maibibigay ang tamang answer. (Ayon sa pagkakaunawa ko) Pero maganda galing kay Atty. answer. Law student pa po ako eh.

[@MarkAnthonySy]

Case # 2: Legally allowed kasi may unlawful aggression na at nasa isip mo na nasa peligro buhay mo.

[@MarkAnthonySy]

Case # 3: Allowed to defend using a firearm kung pumasok sa isip mo na it will cause danger to you and your family. Ung pagpasok sa bahay ninyo na di mo kagustuhan ay pagsagasa sa iyong right to property. Kahit wala silang weapon, pero sa dami nila, that can equate to danger lalo at force ang pag-uusapan. Pero mas maganda kung ang ans. galing kay Atty. JP. Nakita ko lang comment mo at nagtry lang to answer. I am a Law Student po applying ano ang naunawaan.

[@Jerome-iwnl]

@@MarkAnthonySy Thank you very much sir Mark. Pag bit bit na nila yung gamit ko, does that give me the right to defend myself and my home and my property by using a firearm to stop the threat?
I want to protect my family at all cost in a house invasion scenario sir. If someone breaks in with force, isn’t that already an attack on my property? and don’t i have the right to protect my home?

[@marklesterbatang4353]

Atty. may part 3 ba ito?

[@jestonisardual9898]

Sir pwede humingi my pabor? article14 plss explain kasi may report kami 🙏

[@averokayem.1286]

Good day attorney , how about a security guard dinepensahan nga ang kanyabg sarili sa holdapeer kaya napatay mya po

[@peterpiper5300]

hi. are great grandparents no longer considered ascendants? in law, ascendants refer only until grandparents?
thank you for the lectures. i like the way you explain.

[@egosumpulcher1]

Ascendants po.. kasi nasa direct line.. usually kasi hindi na naaabutan amg great grandparents :)

[@peterpiper5300]

@@egosumpulcher1 but if buhay pa ang great grandparents, kasama sila sa definition ng ascendants in criminal law?

[@egosumpulcher1]

@@peterpiper5300 yes.. nasa direct ascending line..

[@balangatmcrhannelb.7948]

Waiting parin po sa art 12 exempting circumstances

[@rolifrancislwakit9256]

So in defense to my 5th degree cousine shall fall under Defense ofstrangers is it?

[@egosumpulcher1]

5th degree cousin? Paano mo nacompute ang 5th degree na cousin? Are you referring to your 2nd cousin?

[@MUP390]

sir ano po ba ang pinagkaiba ng requisites at elements hehehe salamat sir

[@eugeneperez7543]

Article 14 Aggravating circumstances po sana attorney. Sana madiscuss mo po. For studying purposes lng po.

[@egosumpulcher1]

Pagkatapos po ng principals art 17 aggravating isusunod ko..

[@eugeneperez7543]

T. Y. Po.

[@darendavetuyac7306]

sir atty. pwede mo sa (art. 12) naman kasi may report po kami

[@egosumpulcher1]

art. 17 ginagawa ko ngaun eh.. ask ka na lang muna kung may mga clarifications ka about art 12 then i'll just offer guidance sa report niyo..

[@darendavetuyac7306]

@@egosumpulcher1 okay po salamat sir atty.

[@malizaquiamco9797]

Pwedi po magtanong sir?

[@egosumpulcher1]

Yes maam.. yan na po tanong mo? 😂😂

[@malizaquiamco9797]

@@egosumpulcher1 hindi pa po ..gumagawa po ba kayo ng thesis? 😁

[@egosumpulcher1]

@@malizaquiamco9797 what do u mean po na gumagawa ba ako ng thesis?

[@malizaquiamco9797]

@@egosumpulcher1 opo

[@egosumpulcher1]

@@malizaquiamco9797 nung college pa po ako pero hindi na ngayon..