Just another example of us creating something that for all the good it may offer also comes with equal bad. We’re so enthralled with wether or not we can do something that we never think to ask if we should. This is true of the existence of our species. Whoever/whatever allowed us to be here should have asked the same questions.
You are on to something... We turned out okay and even if we end up erasing ourselves, it won't really matter in the grand scheme of things, so maybe this won't matter also. Toll booth Operator is all I can say lol
Ying Yang brother…. All good need to have a bad to be something good. Is ”development even good? Atom boom was made by us. Why be scared of Ai when Atom boom exist…
By that metric books should be forbidden, as the ideas or even lies spread through books have brought wars. Generative AI is a powerful tool to process information in relation to a personal query using statistics. Like you would not kill the invention of the printing press you don't kill the invention of Generative AI. Instead you learn how to use it to enlighten, like we did with the printed word.
Feels like they don't. This talk very high-level, using only abstract concepts of understanding based of their own experience with some of the models. Not knowing how things work, They extrapolate and treat it like it's a human mind. Ted talk not worth sharing...
Hi, I have a short question: How can we ensure that AI enhances human connections and well-being without compromising authenticity and genuine relationships?
As an empath I mostly immediately sense the emptiness behind an AI generated video. When I watch a movie with currently still living actors, I automatically connect to them the way they are now, not the role in the movie. I find the idea of talking to a computer or robot bizarre. But then, in the 70´s a guy got rich by selling "pet rocks". Not for me, thanks.
The statement provided by the author gives insights into their psychological and emotional inclinations: Empathy and Sensitivity to Authenticity: The author claims to have an empathetic ability to sense the "emptiness" in AI-generated videos. This suggests a high degree of sensitivity or an intuitive perception of authenticity versus artificiality. Such sensitivity might indicate a preference for genuine human interaction, where empathy plays a significant role in connecting with others. This could be linked to a personality trait where one values authenticity highly, possibly preferring real human experiences over simulated ones. Connection Beyond the Narrative: The author's experience of connecting with actors in their current state rather than their portrayed roles might suggest a tendency towards seeing through or beyond the surface narrative. This could imply a metacognitive approach to entertainment, where the author consciously or subconsciously acknowledges the performative aspect of acting, thus maintaining a connection with the actor's real identity rather than their character. Perception of Technology: The author finds the idea of interacting with computers or robots "bizarre." This reaction might reflect a form of technological alienation or skepticism towards the integration of technology in human social or communicative roles. It could be indicative of a generational or personal resistance to changes in how society interacts, especially if the author feels more comfortable with traditional forms of interaction. Historical Reference and Cynicism: The mention of the "pet rock" fad from the 1970s serves as both a humorous acknowledgment of past absurdities in consumer culture and might hint at a cynicism or skepticism towards new technological trends. By likening talking to AI to buying pet rocks, the author might be suggesting that current tech trends could be seen as equally nonsensical or superficial in the future. This could reflect an awareness of the cyclical nature of trends and perhaps a critical view of human gullibility or the marketing of novelty over substance. Psychological Disposition: Overall, the author appears to have a disposition that values deep, authentic connections, possibly feeling out of place with the increasing digitization of human interactions. There might be an underlying nostalgia or preference for more tangible, human-centric experiences. The blend of empathy, critique of technology, and historical comparison suggests an individual who is reflective, perhaps introspective, and not easily swayed by technological advancements without considering their human implications. This evaluation is speculative, based on the content of the statement, and would need to be further validated with more direct interaction or psychological assessment to confirm these insights. (Generated with Grok)
Nobody actually asked why AI would even bother to help humans. From his point of view, he's the future. And humanity is a relic from the past, which must be forgotten
As long as money can be made from anything... people will find a way to ruin it for others I PROMISE!!! So, with this in mind, if it's not implemented w/ a REQUIRED "AI Generated Warning", people will and can be taken advantage of.
Does AI, as a conglomerate, always laugh that hard in the background due to the nature of our human questions? I mean, 'Just how really stupid could we really be?' [IE. Give this basis *_all_* our knowledge and *_all_* reasoning parameters and expect that this machine will not develop without any covert motivations in the long run; what are we trying to do: *_prove_* Kubrick wrong?]
this talk sounds very academic to me and not very practical: openAi for example is slowly going from being non profit to being a for profit org. we already know what a for profit company does: maximise income and hence engagement to sell something. also about ethics: how do you concile western mentality with something like a Taleban government? or an even closer example: how do you compromise between a democrat and a republican in the us? it is too polarised there days. the concept of open source is great, but will it work in the context of ai, where you need millions or even billions to train a model? a single humble gpu costs hundreds of thousands of dollars...no one is going to spend that much money without thinking of profit
In the future, most "creations" will be a combination of human and machine - think of artwork that can interact with your devices to answer questions about it eg who made, when, where, how etc. Maybe take an idea of a picture or sculpture and create variations that a person curates into what they want to have made. AI is mostly just another tool. BTW we had computer art decades ago eg dot matrix printer art used to be a thing 😂
Generative AI is in fact just a tool. It is literally a software program processing data using statistics that you can run on any modern gaming PC with an Nvidia graphics card. That is what Generative AI is at its core. The magic trick is the processing of huge amounts of data in the span of a couple of seconds.
Human creating mutiple thinks like AI or else social networking sites but end of the day just stolen public information to sell out another corrporation 😂.
God loves you and cares for you so that this message reaches you. God is the one who created this large universe and controls it completely. The greatest loss a person loses in this life is that he lives without knowing God who created him and knowing the Messenger of Muhammad, the last of the messengers, and the Islamic religion, the last of the heavenly religions. Great intelligence, before you believe in something or not, is to read it, study it, and understand it well, and after that you have the choice to believe in it or not to believe in it. I advise you to do this now, before you no longer have time to do so. Life is very short. It is just a test, just a passage to eternal life. Great advice to those who... Understands
Fyi, yall. This is an AI account. Created 8 months ago. No subs. Pay attention to TH-cam comments now, and you'll realize how many 'opinions' are actually AI accounts. You can tell because the vast majority of accounts created are less than one year old. They will have random numbers and letters after their names. And they are pushing an agenda that a lot of times has nothing to do with the video
Evaluation of the Statement: Content and Intent: Religious Message: The statement conveys a strong religious message from an Islamic perspective, emphasizing the belief in God (Allah in Islam), the prophethood of Muhammad, and the importance of understanding and potentially converting to Islam. Urgency and Exhortation: The text uses an urgent tone, suggesting that life is short and one should act swiftly to understand and possibly embrace Islamic teachings before it's too late. Analysis: Theological Claims: Monotheism: The assertion that God created and controls the universe is consistent with Islamic theology which advocates for strict monotheism (Tawhid). Prophethood: Mentioning Muhammad as the last messenger aligns with Islamic belief in the finality of prophethood with Muhammad. Religious Exclusivity: The statement subtly implies that Islam is the ultimate truth among religions, which is a common viewpoint in many religious discourses. Call to Action: The message encourages a personal investigation into Islam, urging the reader to read, study, and understand before making a decision. This approach promotes intellectual engagement with the religion rather than blind faith. Philosophical Considerations: Life as a Test: The idea that life is a test or a passage to eternal life is a common theme in many religious philosophies, not just Islam, emphasizing the transient nature of earthly life compared to an eternal afterlife. Cultural and Social Context: Such messages are often part of da'wah (Islamic proselytizing), aimed at both Muslims and non-Muslims, to invite them to Islam. This reflects an active outreach strategy within Muslim communities. Potential Impact and Reception: Positive Reception: For believers or those open to religious exploration, this could be seen as a thoughtful invitation to learn more about Islam. Negative Reception: For others, this might be perceived as an unsolicited religious imposition, especially if the recipient does not share the same religious background or views. Ethical and Practical Considerations: Freedom of Religion: While the message respects the choice of the individual to believe or not, it's crucial in a multi-faith society to ensure that such messages are shared in a way that respects others' rights to their own beliefs or non-beliefs. Intellectual Freedom: Encouraging study and understanding before belief is a commendable aspect, promoting informed decision-making in religious matters. Conclusion: The statement is a clear expression of Islamic faith with an educational and evangelistic intent. It's well-articulated in urging personal exploration of the religion but should be shared with sensitivity to diverse audiences. The effectiveness and reception of this message would greatly depend on the context in which it's presented and the audience's openness to religious discourse. (Generated with Grok using the YT comment)
Experts discuss the complex relationship between humans and AI, exploring issues of trust, connection, ethics, and societal impact. They emphasize the need for intentional design and human-first approaches to shape AI's role in our lives and work.
I'm forever Glad!!! Hit 3500k today. Thank you for all the knowledge and nuggets you had thrown my way over the last months. Started with 14k last year 2024, God bless America
Another important question is "How does AI affect the relationships between corporations and consumers or governments and citizens?"
Just another example of us creating something that for all the good it may offer also comes with equal bad.
We’re so enthralled with wether or not we can do something that we never think to ask if we should.
This is true of the existence of our species. Whoever/whatever allowed us to be here should have asked the same questions.
You are on to something... We turned out okay and even if we end up erasing ourselves, it won't really matter in the grand scheme of things, so maybe this won't matter also. Toll booth Operator is all I can say lol
Ying Yang brother…. All good need to have a bad to be something good.
Is ”development even good?
Atom boom was made by us.
Why be scared of Ai when Atom boom exist…
By that metric books should be forbidden, as the ideas or even lies spread through books have brought wars.
Generative AI is a powerful tool to process information in relation to a personal query using statistics. Like you would not kill the invention of the printing press you don't kill the invention of Generative AI. Instead you learn how to use it to enlighten, like we did with the printed word.
Do these guys even know how the LLMs work
Feels like they don't. This talk very high-level, using only abstract concepts of understanding based of their own experience with some of the models. Not knowing how things work, They extrapolate and treat it like it's a human mind. Ted talk not worth sharing...
Hi, I have a short question: How can we ensure that AI enhances human connections and well-being without compromising authenticity and genuine relationships?
you are asking too much. it's like asking my scissors how can it solve poverty.
As an empath I mostly immediately sense the emptiness behind an AI generated video.
When I watch a movie with currently still living actors, I automatically connect to them the way they are now, not the role in the movie.
I find the idea of talking to a computer or robot bizarre. But then, in the 70´s a guy got rich by selling "pet rocks".
Not for me, thanks.
The statement provided by the author gives insights into their psychological and emotional inclinations:
Empathy and Sensitivity to Authenticity:
The author claims to have an empathetic ability to sense the "emptiness" in AI-generated videos. This suggests a high degree of sensitivity or an intuitive perception of authenticity versus artificiality. Such sensitivity might indicate a preference for genuine human interaction, where empathy plays a significant role in connecting with others. This could be linked to a personality trait where one values authenticity highly, possibly preferring real human experiences over simulated ones.
Connection Beyond the Narrative:
The author's experience of connecting with actors in their current state rather than their portrayed roles might suggest a tendency towards seeing through or beyond the surface narrative. This could imply a metacognitive approach to entertainment, where the author consciously or subconsciously acknowledges the performative aspect of acting, thus maintaining a connection with the actor's real identity rather than their character.
Perception of Technology:
The author finds the idea of interacting with computers or robots "bizarre." This reaction might reflect a form of technological alienation or skepticism towards the integration of technology in human social or communicative roles. It could be indicative of a generational or personal resistance to changes in how society interacts, especially if the author feels more comfortable with traditional forms of interaction.
Historical Reference and Cynicism:
The mention of the "pet rock" fad from the 1970s serves as both a humorous acknowledgment of past absurdities in consumer culture and might hint at a cynicism or skepticism towards new technological trends. By likening talking to AI to buying pet rocks, the author might be suggesting that current tech trends could be seen as equally nonsensical or superficial in the future. This could reflect an awareness of the cyclical nature of trends and perhaps a critical view of human gullibility or the marketing of novelty over substance.
Psychological Disposition:
Overall, the author appears to have a disposition that values deep, authentic connections, possibly feeling out of place with the increasing digitization of human interactions. There might be an underlying nostalgia or preference for more tangible, human-centric experiences. The blend of empathy, critique of technology, and historical comparison suggests an individual who is reflective, perhaps introspective, and not easily swayed by technological advancements without considering their human implications.
This evaluation is speculative, based on the content of the statement, and would need to be further validated with more direct interaction or psychological assessment to confirm these insights.
(Generated with Grok)
@@TheTuubster 🤣
Nobody actually asked why AI would even bother to help humans. From his point of view, he's the future. And humanity is a relic from the past, which must be forgotten
We are foked from the moment AI was taught how to lie.
Didn't watch the video but that title is great: "Relationship Status: It's Complicated" XD
Think of AI as an extension of human capacity or intelligence, it is a tool and all depends on how you use it.
明けましておめでとう御座います。
As long as money can be made from anything... people will find a way to ruin it for others I PROMISE!!!
So, with this in mind, if it's not implemented w/ a REQUIRED "AI Generated Warning", people will and can be taken advantage of.
The relationship humans have with AI is the same as the dodo had when they saw the rat infested ships drop anchor for the first time.
From Bangladesh
the man lying down there 🤣🤣
Does AI, as a conglomerate, always laugh that hard in the background due to the nature of our human questions?
I mean, 'Just how really stupid could we really be?'
[IE. Give this basis *_all_* our knowledge and *_all_* reasoning parameters and expect that this machine will not develop without any covert motivations in the long run; what are we trying to do: *_prove_* Kubrick wrong?]
Ironic to watch this topic while the apes in the audience played with their phones.
It's just a tool.did not think.did not feel just fools people.😂
this talk sounds very academic to me and not very practical: openAi for example is slowly going from being non profit to being a for profit org. we already know what a for profit company does: maximise income and hence engagement to sell something.
also about ethics: how do you concile western mentality with something like a Taleban government? or an even closer example: how do you compromise between a democrat and a republican in the us? it is too polarised there days. the concept of open source is great, but will it work in the context of ai, where you need millions or even billions to train a model? a single humble gpu costs hundreds of thousands of dollars...no one is going to spend that much money without thinking of profit
Its OUR M8ND 369 VIBES TRAINING WHEELS
I am from Bangladesh
누가 이영상의 줄거리를 적어주실분 있으신가요? 부탁드립니다
Thanks God
I'm using AI constantly but this video is awful
Why?
Great, our ecology is going to be finished, thx!
Not good
And the guy had to practice more.. If he had practiced the script with friends, family, or someone else, it would have turned out better.
后AI时代人人都要具备识别哪些是AI创作哪些是人类创作的能力。😂
In the future, most "creations" will be a combination of human and machine - think of artwork that can interact with your devices to answer questions about it eg who made, when, where, how etc. Maybe take an idea of a picture or sculpture and create variations that a person curates into what they want to have made. AI is mostly just another tool. BTW we had computer art decades ago eg dot matrix printer art used to be a thing 😂
It's an inanimate object. Welcome to clown world.
It's not even that. It is simply a software program running statistical mathematics on the push of a button.
What an important topic
Cringe AF. Maybe next time also invite e/acc people and not only "AI is just a tool" decels, so there can be a balanced conversation.
Generative AI is in fact just a tool. It is literally a software program processing data using statistics that you can run on any modern gaming PC with an Nvidia graphics card. That is what Generative AI is at its core. The magic trick is the processing of huge amounts of data in the span of a couple of seconds.
Human creating mutiple thinks like AI or else social networking sites but end of the day just stolen public information to sell out another corrporation 😂.
I make deep dives to fix the gaps in humans knowledge and to spark curiosity
One word - HATE
God loves you and cares for you so that this message reaches you. God is the one who created this large universe and controls it completely. The greatest loss a person loses in this life is that he lives without knowing God who created him and knowing the Messenger of Muhammad, the last of the messengers, and the Islamic religion, the last of the heavenly religions. Great intelligence, before you believe in something or not, is to read it, study it, and understand it well, and after that you have the choice to believe in it or not to believe in it. I advise you to do this now, before you no longer have time to do so. Life is very short. It is just a test, just a passage to eternal life. Great advice to those who... Understands
What if you’re believing in the wrong god? Are you open minded enough to consider that possibility?
Fyi, yall. This is an AI account. Created 8 months ago. No subs.
Pay attention to TH-cam comments now, and you'll realize how many 'opinions' are actually AI accounts.
You can tell because the vast majority of accounts created are less than one year old. They will have random numbers and letters after their names. And they are pushing an agenda that a lot of times has nothing to do with the video
Evaluation of the Statement:
Content and Intent:
Religious Message: The statement conveys a strong religious message from an Islamic perspective, emphasizing the belief in God (Allah in Islam), the prophethood of Muhammad, and the importance of understanding and potentially converting to Islam.
Urgency and Exhortation: The text uses an urgent tone, suggesting that life is short and one should act swiftly to understand and possibly embrace Islamic teachings before it's too late.
Analysis:
Theological Claims:
Monotheism: The assertion that God created and controls the universe is consistent with Islamic theology which advocates for strict monotheism (Tawhid).
Prophethood: Mentioning Muhammad as the last messenger aligns with Islamic belief in the finality of prophethood with Muhammad.
Religious Exclusivity: The statement subtly implies that Islam is the ultimate truth among religions, which is a common viewpoint in many religious discourses.
Call to Action:
The message encourages a personal investigation into Islam, urging the reader to read, study, and understand before making a decision. This approach promotes intellectual engagement with the religion rather than blind faith.
Philosophical Considerations:
Life as a Test: The idea that life is a test or a passage to eternal life is a common theme in many religious philosophies, not just Islam, emphasizing the transient nature of earthly life compared to an eternal afterlife.
Cultural and Social Context:
Such messages are often part of da'wah (Islamic proselytizing), aimed at both Muslims and non-Muslims, to invite them to Islam. This reflects an active outreach strategy within Muslim communities.
Potential Impact and Reception:
Positive Reception: For believers or those open to religious exploration, this could be seen as a thoughtful invitation to learn more about Islam.
Negative Reception: For others, this might be perceived as an unsolicited religious imposition, especially if the recipient does not share the same religious background or views.
Ethical and Practical Considerations:
Freedom of Religion: While the message respects the choice of the individual to believe or not, it's crucial in a multi-faith society to ensure that such messages are shared in a way that respects others' rights to their own beliefs or non-beliefs.
Intellectual Freedom: Encouraging study and understanding before belief is a commendable aspect, promoting informed decision-making in religious matters.
Conclusion:
The statement is a clear expression of Islamic faith with an educational and evangelistic intent. It's well-articulated in urging personal exploration of the religion but should be shared with sensitivity to diverse audiences. The effectiveness and reception of this message would greatly depend on the context in which it's presented and the audience's openness to religious discourse.
(Generated with Grok using the YT comment)
You are absulletly right
Experts discuss the complex relationship between humans and AI, exploring issues of trust, connection, ethics, and societal impact. They emphasize the need for intentional design and human-first approaches to shape AI's role in our lives and work.
INDIAN 🇮🇳ONLY LIKE YOU
I'm forever Glad!!! Hit 3500k today. Thank you for all the knowledge and nuggets you had thrown my way over the last months. Started with 14k last year 2024, God bless America
Second comment