Fischer CRUSHED The World's No.3 Player in 10 Moves | Beat Everyone With this TRAP!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ค. 2024
- Learn 3 Main Ways To Improve Your Chess Results Significantly
FREE Masterclass ► chess-teacher.com/masterclass
Take Your Chess Skills To The Next Level With High-Quality Courses
Learn here ► online.chess-teacher.com/
💰💲 Join the RCA Affiliate Program, promote our courses, and get 50% commission - chess-teacher.com/partnership/
♛ Find the chess opening trap by Fischer in this blog-post - chess-teacher.com/bobby-fisch...
🔹 Deadly Chess TRAP to Win in 7 Moves! [Works up to 2200 ELO] - • Deadly Chess TRAP to W...
In this video lesson, GM Igor Smirnov shares with you a powerful chess opening trap for White that was used by the former world champion Bobby Fischer to defeat the world's no.3 player (Bent Larsen) in just about 10 moves!
You will also learn to use the same tactical pattern of sacrificing the knight on f7 (Nxf7) to hunt the Black king in the most common chess openings. For example, you will learn the attacking idea of Nxf7 in the Tennison Gambit from the Zukertort Opening and also from the Scotch Gambit chess opening!
▬▬▬▬▬▬
► Chapters
00:00 Powerful Chess Opening Trap by Bobby Fischer
00:17 Bobby Fischer vs Bent Larsen
00:51 Alekhine Defense Trap: Common Tactical Pattern
03:19 Keep attacking the Black king
05:11 78% Win Rate: Nxf7 Tactical Pattern
07:18 Scotch Gambit Trap with Nxf7 Idea
📗 Free chess courses - chess-teacher.com/rca-freebies/
#IgorNation #ChessTraps #OpeningTraps #BobbyFischer - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
💡 Register to GM Igor Smirnov's FREE Masterclass "The Best Way to Improve at Chess INSTANTLY" - chess-teacher.com/masterclass
💲 Join the RCA Affiliate Program, promote our courses, and get 50% commission - chess-teacher.com/partnership/
Why do you keep saying "Chak" ? The word is "Check".
OMG, I NEED THAT SO BAD! WHERE DO I SEND MY MONEY!!!
Fun fact - it was these games against Larson that made the Soviets realize Taimanov did not intentionally lose 6-0 to Fischer and that he shouldn't have been punished as such. Fischer was simply playing at a 2800+ level (or whatever) in an era where no one had access to stockfish.
Yeah, that's the nutty thing about Bobby. He was a god at chess before computer analysis was even CLOSE to him.
This is an important point. How good Fischer was WITHOUT access to study engine lines. It’s why I get confused whenever someone anoints Carlsen the best ever. How can you compare eras fairly? Can you imagine how good Fischer would be with the same advantages todays players have.
@@brianmcgee127 exactly! I have expressed the same logic as you with numerous people who have crowned Kasparov or Carlsen goat. They think I don’t know what I’m talking about.
My money is on Fischer!
Kasparov for the win!
@@gooddognigel9992 under your argument morphy is the best ever.
Larsen played this same line against Tal in the Candidates. Commentators said it was like waving a red flag in front of a bull. Tal said in his book, that if it was a simul, he'd think his opponent overlooked it, with the king being forced onto e6, but obviously with Larsen that can't be the case. Tal sank into thoughts and after 40 minutes calculating found some sort of defense and didn't sac.
Thanks for the interesting addon!
@@GMIgorSmirnov Little bit same kind of position happened in 1970`s between Karpov and Korchnoy. In one game Karpov offered a knight against Victor. Victor thought for sure that " I can take his Knight, but should I take it ? After all, I am now playing against world champ. " After long thought, finally Victor left Karpov`s knight on board. Rudi Rafael
Thanks for being a good coach for us beginners. Subbed.
Fischers games are always fascinating,always had a brilliant winning move up his sleeve.
Yup!
Except for when he lost.
@@nonedefense8296 everyone loses at times. Do you even play chess?
@@user-qt5eh9wb7g yes I play chess both daily and poorly.
The original comment said BF always had a brilliant WINNING move up his sleeve. I responded except for win he lost.
If someone said Michael Jordan always won the game I'd say except for when he lost.
It was a joke friend, don't cancel me.
@@nonedefense8296 pathetic
Very enjoyable video. I was a big fan of Fischer in 1972 when I was a young newlywed working at the local shipyard.
► Chapters
00:00 Powerful Chess Opening Trap by Bobby Fischer
00:17 Bobby Fischer vs Bent Larsen
00:51 Alekhine Defense Trap: Common Tactical Pattern
03:19 Keep attacking the Black king
05:11 78% Win Rate: Nxf7 Tactical Pattern
07:18 Scotch Gambit Trap with Nxf7 Idea
Scoth gambit trap Nxf7
@@artemiollena2358 :
Scotch Gambit Trap *+* Nxf7 *idea*
Thank you for this fantastic video ! I'm a beginner in chess & finds this chess tactics and moves really interesting and worth trying !
Glad you enjoyed it!
Brilliant video...thx .....an important reminder to always have The Beginners Mind....that's how we keep learning from the greats !
Thank you GM Smirnov !! This is fun and awesome
He has an amazing American accent.
Hey first time viewer, long time chess player. I really enjoyed these analysis. Great chess content. You've got a sub from me.
I stumbled on this knight sac a few weeks ago. Great in Bullet because the constant checks take so much time off your opponent's clock.
I'm glad you're having good results with it!
Great job sir
Excellent.!!!
I learned chess after the match series between Fischer and Spasky. But never could see a match of Fischer. Now I understand why he was great.
Well that was fun!
Thank you.
That was fun to watch. As are all your videos. Thank you
Glad you enjoyed it!
What should white do after black plays bishop A5 on move 3 ??
Alekhine defense trap looks so fun but it's very risky isn't it? What if, instead of 1. Nf3 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Ng5 Nf6, black plays 3. ... Bf5? That ruins the gambit and white is simply down a pawn, with a hanging knight. 3. ... Bf5 seems a natural move (if not as common as Nf6) even if black suspects nothing (or at least doesn't know this gambit). Is there a "backup plan" for white in the case of 3. ... Bf5, or is it really just risking it all on the hope that black plays 3. ... Nf6?
Thanks for the great lessons!
Very Strong 💪 power openning game and tactics
What a beautiful tactical play,
This video is very helpful...
My chess coach and I hooked up the other day for a 4 hour lesson.
We covered chess openings,
This further helps me along.
Thank you again
Thanks, Mike! I'm glad the video was helpful and timely for you.
Using the knight in the fried liver instead of the bishop keeps a strong follow up bishop surprise check on the king winning the queen. Genius.
Just bought soft soft! So excited to get started!!
plz tell me a great chess software
I'm a intermediate player
Where can I find these dat base
Hi GM Igor Smirnov, I am a fan!
Thanks
Merci c'était très pédagogique👍
🙏
thank you
Awesome...
Beautiful stuff. Thank you
Thank you!
Great video appreciate the information
Glad it was helpful!
That was dope...Chess is the coolest sport
It is very interesting.
What's the name of the app he's using for analysing?
Amazing, this man i so smart!
❤ unbelievable! Exactly this Kamikaze style of playing is what i have been trying insistently, i thought it was against the book, but i was so sure of this principle because you are basically forcing the opponent to move where you actually need him to!
What a genius!!!!
6:20 What's the correct move for black at this situation? Or is it to not get into the situation in the first place?
Queen's knight to qb3 I suppose.
hello! wath software you use to analise this game moves?
Stockfish 15
2 mn 44s Kd5 instead of Kc6. Do you think of this variant ?
nice one
Nice
Can you make a vedio on hippo opening please :)
Luvvit - thanks!
Looking forward to the Tennison gambit video!
Here it is: th-cam.com/video/WXHpvsxdkFg/w-d-xo.html
Apparently, you are too youngvto know Fisher never played for a draw.
Beautiful
Interesting, can't find the game online, must keep looking...
4:45 Pawn to E5 or E6??
Mantap 👍👍👍
This is a blitz game played at the Santa Monica blitz, 1966.
Wade/OConnell's Fischer book mentions this game and says that Evans in Chess Life says that after 10...Kd6 Larsen said "now I play for a win!" Evans says then "he got slaughtered after 11 c4..."
😂
Thanks. I played in the USCF from 1967 to 1986, and followed BF closely, soon as I saw the opening moves, I thought, where the HELL was THIS game from?!?! Thanks for clarifying. However, it seems strange that BF, who was famous for not playing for draws against anybody, would, apparently, do so with the White piece, no less, in a blitz game. I've no idea why he repeated moves, nor what he intended if Larsen had not deviated. I remember Larsen crowing about him getting the top board over Fischer to play against Spassky in the 1970 "USSR vs the Rest of the World" and he, Larsen, got squashed in, like, 18 moves. I also remember him writing a column that "explained away" his 6-0 loss to Fischer that was titled, "Unlucky Heat Wave in Denver" (where the match was played, lol.
@@tubeerv After his lost match against Lasker Tarrasch "explained away" the disaster having suffered from the sea climate in Düsseldorf (Tarrasch lived in Munich ). Düsseldorf has no "sea climate" - this is plain nonsense, still hundreds of miles to go.
@@rainerausdemspring3584 Yeah, Tarrasch was, if memory serves, a CRUSTY old sucker, and I see where the Great Dane BL got his "inspiration" from, lol.
@@tubeerv Tarrasch was rather dogmatic, but he was a great player and was called "Praeceptor Germaniae" since many players learned form his famous books.
It must have been a great triumph for him to beat the equally dogmatic Niemzowitsch in a spectacular game.
His life was very hard - he lost all three sons very early. One died in WW I, one committed suicide and one died in an accident. Of his 3 daughters one died very young, too.
At least he died "early enough" - in 1934 - not to suffer from the Mazis.
On his tombstone is engraved (of course in German): Dr. Siegbert Tarrasch Arzt und Schachgrossmeister, Praeceptor Germaniae
What a tombstone!
Where did you get that software that shows different win rates in the openings? REALLY COOL!
It's Lichess.
What a game!
Thank you very much Igor, your video is not fast like most Tutors I have seen and it is very clear. The whole presentation was excellent, I loved it. Keep up the good job and may God multiply your good.
Glad to hear that!
That was a great comment until you mentioned god.
❤
Let's leave religion out of this please
Cool!
I might be missing something here, but why can't the black queen simply move to b5, take the white knight at 4:42 and avoid checkmate?
I notice ,you have talent in commenting., good luck!
Stockfish won't make the move 6:25 Pawn-H6. When you pick the most common move from a database with a hugh number of matches played by nuBs, the most common move can very often be the wrong move. This is especially true when tricky traps are involved. A database only composed of matches played by advanced+ level players would give you much better results, since many of the junk moves would be eliminated from the statistics..
what about 11... e6 instead of 11... N7f6?
12. cxd5 exd5
13. Bf4+ Ke7
14. Bd3 Nf6
... and black can hope for a draw
What an amazing game
This is a very good one I have tried it and it works very well
Only if your opponent plays the terrible move Kd6, like Larsen.
Can you make a video on how to identify tactics in a position
Or positions which are common
It will help a lot
This one could be helpful: th-cam.com/video/ukDOQw-lnFA/w-d-xo.html
Absolutely filthy… I love it
👍👍👍
Igor, your accent is definitely very interesting. I wasn't able to tell where you're from just by listening to you.
When you're walked through it, it all seems so clear. But whoever calculated all this to start with was a fine chess player indeed.
Ryt🤞
I played Larsen in a simul back in the 70s and he crushed me in 14 moves! Just as well I wasn't playing Fischer.
Larsen was a brilliant player, of course.
Fisher is the man to go to if you wanna surprise your friends
4:45, Why black resign if black can play bishop D7 to stop the chechmate? is't because he loss the rock and most likely lose the game?
NOBODY in chess tournaments play until checkmate... 99% of the games finish by resignation when the position is lost.
@1:43 is White Bishop to C4 a mistake pinning knight to king?
White can play c6 and the knight is sufficiently defended
@@Blobbyo25 I was thinking as option other than tie and both bishops still can’t come out. Also next move can castle and then check King with rook.
It's an idea worth considering for White indeed.
Black mainly wants to play Nd7-f6 and after that, he's rather fine. So White has to stop that somehow.
Fischer beat him like a drum!
Show how defend it too
Yay the trap worked 😆 feels really funny to pull off
😎
4:51 - King pawn push blocking the queen?
Weak move.... the king is wide open
@@TheRomanianWolf actually i am amature, can u explain clearly how its a weak move?
@@meanonymous7135 Knight c7 checkmate
@@nolongerhuman1939 king e7?
@@meanonymous7135
My bad
After King e7,bishop c5 for checkmate
I think the lesson is if you play the Alekhine you better know it pretty good.
Nice,but which enemy will start with the Knight instead of the pawn😭
Larsen: "I'm playing for the win, bitch"
10 moves later..
Larsen: "Oh"
wow
5:07 could Larson have not played Qb4+ then picked up the bishop?
Pawn defends that square
Fried fox 🦊 gambit is more fun to play against Alekhine's imo
Pride goeth before a fall, Larsen should have taken the draw against Fischer :)
5:27 ICBM gambit
Just tried this trap on one opponent, and it worked!
💪
I think Fischer knew Larsens' personality and knew he wouldn't accept a draw, even with black. He thought he could beat Fischer and said so before the match.
Not bad
As always, I remember the first move and from there it is all downhill because I am not a good chess player!😁
🤣
memorising moves someone else tells you to make doesn't make you a good chess player
@@m1nt9reen Actually, I am a superb player right up to the second move!
Wouldn’t Qb2xNb5 have saved the checkmate? Larsen then could have countered Fischer’s bishop check with the pawn or his bishop.
That would prevent the checkmate indeed. However, White will have a huge material advantage and Fischer would definitely win with an extra queen.
I’m confused why black can’t move Qb5 capturing the Knight. White can then play Bb5 capturing the Queen and mate but then Kf7 is available?
@@GMIgorSmirnov But why not Pawn to E6? Then king flees to F7 and if Kc7xRa8 then Qc3 check and QxBc4. The material would the roughly equal, and White's knight is trapped in a8.
At 4:14 why didn't the black queen capture the white knight thus putting white in check?
Because the knight is DEFENDED by the pawn. It's a very STUPID move.
i put this video on 2x speed, just so i didn't have to listen to the commentary, and could watch the real mastery at work...
I cannot survive such trickery
tried this opener against hard AI and they just don't seem to play it this way. they'll often open up with a knight after I open with mine.
AI is soo different from real ppl in blitz game
@@chazvidz9239 I found if you play the AI consistently with tips enabled they'll show you different variations and you just memorize the responses. AI definitely doesn't blunder as much as humans that's for sure.
Why not move the queen to E3 instead of the bishop?
Game could have continued by Bd7 block
Master..in my experience that 65% people know this trap..even "new entry people" so I avoid these traps..if succeed these traps are best "under control". Can these traps implement in to black against white?
You may like to use this trap as Black: th-cam.com/video/qyt01xy_ytg/w-d-xo.html
Agreed many move the queen out right away protecting the pawn and attacking my knight. I tried this 5 times and it only worked once.
Yay I learn another opening trap next mission convince my classmate to put his pawn to g5😂😂
Other knight
😍
Lichess player database isn't good for traps because people make bots to play against each other to inflate (and later sell) high rated accounts, using trap lines. That way it doesn't trigger the bot detectors (stockfish doesn't fall for traps) and human review of a game is inconclusive because maybe someone fell for the trap. But dig deeper into those games and you'll see one account falling for the same trap line over and over for like 100 games in a row.
Being a GM and losing in 10 moves is unfathomable to me. It's like everyone before Magnus had some sort of mental disorder that made them bad at board games.
It's called pressure. Anxiety. Human frailty. Overthinking.
ikr, i guess thats because there were no engines then