@@prashantnaik8273 I know it is written in Devanagari script, but I am not sure if it is the original script of Marathi or adopted later as in the case of Konkani.
@@prashantnaik8273 Marathi has a script of its own, which was used very recently (1940s or 50s). The then Maharashtrian politicians then popularized Devanagari script, due to various reasons.
A very importan point that most discussions about the inquisition don't touch on is that even devout Indian Catholics were targetted if they used Konkani (or other Indian languages) in their worship. The idea was to de-rascinate themv completely from their culture, not just religious zeal. They were forced to use Portuguese/Latin in matters of the church and many had to change their names to adopt Iberian/Christian names.
29:55 Razakars were a private army created under the rule of Nizam of Hyderabad during 1947 in order to forcefully convert Hindus of Hyderabad into Muslims. I think you should react to Operation Polo and how Sardar Patel forced Hyderabad and the Nizam to join India in 1948.😂😊
Hyderabad is still unsafe for Hindus even today. My Grandma's Sister and her husband had to flee Hyderabad and relocate to Bengaluru, because they were being threatened by AIMIM Goons to sell their Land, Because it was near a Mosque and Muslim majority area. They tried their best to refuse but one day my Grand,a's sister';s husband was beaten up while coming back from work (He worked in Salarjung Museum). So Police didn't help them, They were under Political control, They had no choice but to leave. No Bloody media house will tell you stories like this, They will only show when some random Muslim is slapped in India.
@@aaronnrodgersdear rice bag convert please get your facts straight before making a fool of yourself. Caste system was birth based. Your caste is decided based on the family you're born in. That was introduced by Portugese. Varna system is skill based. It has nothing to do with family a person is born in. Son of a sudra can become a Brahmin, son of vaishya can become a kshatriya.... So next time rather than make a fool of yourself I suggest do some research.
@@aaronnrodgers No. Varna means Job Classification, All Nations had these. Japan haad these, Feudal Europe had these, Arabs had these, Aztecs had these, Russia had these. Caste Systeme did not originate in the beginning, It was a Corrution of this Varna system. So Hindus were not discriminating each other on basid of their Occpation. In-fact, British made it a Law to state one's Caste openly for surveys. Using this data, They conviniently spread Caste conflict, Just like they did everywhere else in the world to divide and rule. Read accounts by Chinese Travellers like Hieun Tsang, He mentions no discrimination, Only 7 separate Classifications of Work, throughout his 20 year trip to India.
@@goblinslayer3957 ever epoken to dalit? I have. They'll tell you about the centuries of shit they've had to bear. So Varna, caste whatever you call it. Same shit
that comment around 30:00 , its about what muslims did to hindus in Southern India, Moplah massacre is also a related topic. I learnt about these through videos but can't recal
There is a very good book about the partition of India... It also covers the Razaakar incident of Telengana I guess... Few days ago two Bengali guys are discussing about the book in their YT channel... The book name Dethroned : by John Zubrzycki
Yes, that is one of the reasons why Indians trusted British, because out of all the foreign powers they are the only people who are not interested in any kind of religious atrocities at least at first, then came all the Christian missionaries and fake atrocity literatures about Hinduism, which is destroying our country even in present.
@@user-fd9kh6zq4f nope. the british were undoubtedly the nicest imperialists in history. while still evil, it was several orders of magnitudes less bad. especially for the common man... there is a reason why Bengal embraced the Brits... they were a massive upgrade from the Sultanate.
I am guessing, at that time, Muslims were ruling 3/4th of India, Portuguese would being decimated if they angered them. Muslim rulers themselves were famous for their cruelty
7:19 I'm not sure but my guess is, although Islam is different from Christianity but it's still somewhat similar to it, because it's also an abrahamic religion, whereas hinduism is not an abrahamic religion, in hinduism people do idol worship, which is considered a great "sin" in @br@h@mic faiths.
Portuguese Inquisition in Ceylon was as barbaric as the Inquisition in Goa. Nobody talks today of the genocidal crimes committed during the Portuguese era of Ceylon.
Oh I'm sure, to be honest I hear less about the history of Sri Lanka than most places. I need to seek out more information so I'm not left being ignorant
History isn't always Black and White. While the Portugese commited attrocities, They were also allied with some Indian Kingdoms like the Vijayanagara, Whose Indian Kings had Portugese mechants who were friends who brought them Gifts like Guns, Cannons and Hand Telescopes in exchange for Diamonds, Spices and Silk. There was no persecution by Portugese in these regions, Where they had alliances. The persecution was restricted mostly to Goa and Malabar Coast. So you see, History is more complex than we think. It wasn't "All Portugese were Evil", Some of them were, in some of the regions. This History of Goan Inquisitions isn't taught in India to our Kids, Sadly. Our History books are extremely censored of all Conflicts / Massacres / Injustices, Because our Leftists always hide the truth for some reason.
@@ReldrikGeo but i think they are right because many converted goan worshipped portugal rather than india 80 percent indians did'nt know about goa hindu's massive genocide also i don't conisder goan as indian citizens
Its the same today for pagans. Its just that they are not in power right now. See the condition of pagans in US or Australia where they are minorities.
3:54 the reason is, they all say only my views is true and other's views are wrong. Just think, if someone says only my views are "true" and other's views are "false" and hence they(others) should be damned for their "false" views, isn't this inherently a supermascist stance? and we very well know that from supermacism only comes hatred or dislike towards others.
Actually, the main problem in Abrahamic religion is the concept of "one god". Many think it's a good concept. People belive that all Abrahamic religions worship the same one god. But in reality, all 3 main Abrahamic religion's 'god' is very different to each other. So all 3 religions belives that only their version of 'god' is the true god and the other religion's god is false and they are worshipping the god in the false way. And that belief resulted in the conflicts. Meanwhile Indian religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism etc didn't had such a strict view on God. The number one important thing in Abrahamic religions is "god". But in Indian religions, life, Dharma (cosmic law underlying right behaviour and social order) is more important than "god". Hindusim taught people to worship god in whatever way you like. That's why Hindusim have thousands of gods and thousands of ways to worship god depending on region. The main thing in Hindusim is just is Dharma (right behaviour and social order). Meanwhile for Abrahamic religions is "god" is the main thing. This is why when Abrahamic religions from the west arrived in India, Hindus didn't think of it as "wrong". Hindus just felt it like it's their way of worshipping the god. And Hindus didn't felt the urge to convert them, because Hindus never thought it as wrong. But the Abrahamic religions saw Hidnusim as wrong religion. They see Hindus as "pagans" who worship the devil. They think only their way of worshipping the god is the right way and all others are gong to hell. And that created conflicts.
Although all Abrahamic faiths follow same God but their discord is about who is the real prophet or who is last prophet and which book is the real words of God.
You should watch it frm someone who is indian historian..this video doesn't conveyed the horrors of the inquisition how they trapped the people there frm outside n how they killed n converted...
This story has been manipulated and maligned by hindutvas. History must be factual not speculation or biased to suit a special group to advance their interest. The story starts with caste system that was created by Indians especially the Brahmin who consider themselves at top of hierarchy.
This Inquisition is the reason why Konkani doesn't have a script of its own, despite being one of the older languages of India.
Even Marathi and hindi doesn't have
@@prashantnaik8273 Hindi has. Not sure about Marathi
@@aryanverma9877 marathi is written in Devanagari script
@@prashantnaik8273 I know it is written in Devanagari script, but I am not sure if it is the original script of Marathi or adopted later as in the case of Konkani.
@@prashantnaik8273 Marathi has a script of its own, which was used very recently (1940s or 50s). The then Maharashtrian politicians then popularized Devanagari script, due to various reasons.
The religion you called 'Hinduism' has a solid base because it is the oldest practiced sets of religions...
True lol
A very importan point that most discussions about the inquisition don't touch on is that even devout Indian Catholics were targetted if they used Konkani (or other Indian languages) in their worship. The idea was to de-rascinate themv completely from their culture, not just religious zeal. They were forced to use Portuguese/Latin in matters of the church and many had to change their names to adopt Iberian/Christian names.
yes this is very important. very different from the christians in kerela
You won't find old temple like Hampi / Belur Halebeedu in Goa I think there are just 2 or 3 left.
29:55 Razakars were a private army created under the rule of Nizam of Hyderabad during 1947 in order to forcefully convert Hindus of Hyderabad into Muslims.
I think you should react to Operation Polo and how Sardar Patel forced Hyderabad and the Nizam to join India in 1948.😂😊
Whenever I hear the word Razakars, I always remember Owaisi😂
@@aryanverma9877 Indeed his grandfather was made the President of his Muslim party by the General of Razakars.
@@thedonbhai9137 isn't that the same party now known as AIMIM?
@@ssjgoku276 Yes
Hyderabad is still unsafe for Hindus even today. My Grandma's Sister and her husband had to flee Hyderabad and relocate to Bengaluru, because they were being threatened by AIMIM Goons to sell their Land, Because it was near a Mosque and Muslim majority area. They tried their best to refuse but one day my Grand,a's sister';s husband was beaten up while coming back from work (He worked in Salarjung Museum). So Police didn't help them, They were under Political control, They had no choice but to leave.
No Bloody media house will tell you stories like this, They will only show when some random Muslim is slapped in India.
There were varnas not caste system , caste was introduced by Portuguese and taken ahead by British to divide hindus .and convert .
Varna, caste whatever. You're just arguing names for what is essentially the same system.
@@aaronnrodgersdear rice bag convert please get your facts straight before making a fool of yourself.
Caste system was birth based. Your caste is decided based on the family you're born in. That was introduced by Portugese.
Varna system is skill based. It has nothing to do with family a person is born in. Son of a sudra can become a Brahmin, son of vaishya can become a kshatriya....
So next time rather than make a fool of yourself I suggest do some research.
@@aaronnrodgers learn about it then comment rice bag.
@@aaronnrodgers No. Varna means Job Classification, All Nations had these. Japan haad these, Feudal Europe had these, Arabs had these, Aztecs had these, Russia had these. Caste Systeme did not originate in the beginning, It was a Corrution of this Varna system.
So Hindus were not discriminating each other on basid of their Occpation. In-fact, British made it a Law to state one's Caste openly for surveys. Using this data, They conviniently spread Caste conflict, Just like they did everywhere else in the world to divide and rule. Read accounts by Chinese Travellers like Hieun Tsang, He mentions no discrimination, Only 7 separate Classifications of Work, throughout his 20 year trip to India.
@@goblinslayer3957 ever epoken to dalit? I have. They'll tell you about the centuries of shit they've had to bear. So Varna, caste whatever you call it. Same shit
What u have heard is very less compared to what happened during inquisition listen some of Indians from Goa about real things like Shifali Vadya
Reading about those bre@st rippers still make me shudder
@@arnavranka4510 that story debunked already
@@RAJATKULKARNI07 Not that South Indian one. I mean the ones used by Catholic missionaries in Goa.
@@arnavranka4510 Oki I thought another miss informed white is here 😉
@@arnavranka4510 ohh I miss understood
that comment around 30:00 , its about what muslims did to hindus in Southern India, Moplah massacre is also a related topic. I learnt about these through videos but can't recal
There is a very good book about the partition of India... It also covers the Razaakar incident of Telengana I guess... Few days ago two Bengali guys are discussing about the book in their YT channel... The book name Dethroned : by John Zubrzycki
If you compare Portuguese rule the Britishers were angels 😇
Yes, that is one of the reasons why Indians trusted British, because out of all the foreign powers they are the only people who are not interested in any kind of religious atrocities at least at first, then came all the Christian missionaries and fake atrocity literatures about Hinduism, which is destroying our country even in present.
No shit lesser demon and higher demons= at the end of the day they are demon's
No, Britishers were really bad
@@user-fd9kh6zq4f nope. the british were undoubtedly the nicest imperialists in history. while still evil, it was several orders of magnitudes less bad. especially for the common man... there is a reason why Bengal embraced the Brits... they were a massive upgrade from the Sultanate.
I am guessing, at that time, Muslims were ruling 3/4th of India, Portuguese would being decimated if they angered them. Muslim rulers themselves were famous for their cruelty
7:19 I'm not sure but my guess is, although Islam is different from Christianity but it's still somewhat similar to it, because it's also an abrahamic religion,
whereas hinduism is not an abrahamic religion, in hinduism people do idol worship, which is considered a great "sin" in @br@h@mic faiths.
They didn't destroy Mosques bec North India had muslim sultanete so if they did that then they would face invasion
Portuguese Inquisition in Ceylon was as barbaric as the Inquisition in Goa. Nobody talks today of the genocidal crimes committed during the Portuguese era of Ceylon.
Oh I'm sure, to be honest I hear less about the history of Sri Lanka than most places. I need to seek out more information so I'm not left being ignorant
Read my article under the Title
' Repression of Buddhism in Ceylon by the Portuguese (1505 - 1658).
It is available on the Internet.
History isn't always Black and White. While the Portugese commited attrocities, They were also allied with some Indian Kingdoms like the Vijayanagara, Whose Indian Kings had Portugese mechants who were friends who brought them Gifts like Guns, Cannons and Hand Telescopes in exchange for Diamonds, Spices and Silk.
There was no persecution by Portugese in these regions, Where they had alliances. The persecution was restricted mostly to Goa and Malabar Coast. So you see, History is more complex than we think. It wasn't "All Portugese were Evil", Some of them were, in some of the regions. This History of Goan Inquisitions isn't taught in India to our Kids, Sadly. Our History books are extremely censored of all Conflicts / Massacres / Injustices, Because our Leftists always hide the truth for some reason.
Bijpaur Sultanate and delhi Sultanante were a thing to fear for and Portuguese destroying mosques would be a bigger conflict
That's true, I didn't think of that
you react to so much India, i think its time you come and visit our nation. you're always welcome!
I definitely want to visit, have to get money first lol
Immense respect for open minded people like you.
please react to more video of this channel. He make interesting videos on history
Yeah he does, I've watched a few before
Welcome to reality...
Currently i saw many reddit users who are saying that Goans are not indians
they are belongs to portugal ☠️
I really hate reddit
@@ReldrikGeo but i think they are right because many converted goan worshipped portugal rather than india
80 percent indians did'nt know about goa hindu's massive genocide
also i don't conisder goan as indian citizens
the 500 years ago common sense and today modern common sense is like day and night difference
Its the same today for pagans. Its just that they are not in power right now. See the condition of pagans in US or Australia where they are minorities.
which society is not caste system bro caste system means hierarchy in india . even exam system is like caste system.
3:54 the reason is, they all say only my views is true and other's views are wrong.
Just think, if someone says only my views are "true" and other's views are "false" and hence they(others) should be damned for their "false" views, isn't this inherently a supermascist stance? and we very well know that from supermacism only comes hatred or dislike towards others.
😢😢❤
Actually, the main problem in Abrahamic religion is the concept of "one god". Many think it's a good concept. People belive that all Abrahamic religions worship the same one god. But in reality, all 3 main Abrahamic religion's 'god' is very different to each other. So all 3 religions belives that only their version of 'god' is the true god and the other religion's god is false and they are worshipping the god in the false way. And that belief resulted in the conflicts.
Meanwhile Indian religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism etc didn't had such a strict view on God. The number one important thing in Abrahamic religions is "god". But in Indian religions, life, Dharma (cosmic law underlying right behaviour and social order) is more important than "god". Hindusim taught people to worship god in whatever way you like. That's why Hindusim have thousands of gods and thousands of ways to worship god depending on region. The main thing in Hindusim is just is Dharma (right behaviour and social order). Meanwhile for Abrahamic religions is "god" is the main thing.
This is why when Abrahamic religions from the west arrived in India, Hindus didn't think of it as "wrong". Hindus just felt it like it's their way of worshipping the god. And Hindus didn't felt the urge to convert them, because Hindus never thought it as wrong. But the Abrahamic religions saw Hidnusim as wrong religion. They see Hindus as "pagans" who worship the devil. They think only their way of worshipping the god is the right way and all others are gong to hell. And that created conflicts.
Dude watch Shogun.
Although all Abrahamic faiths follow same God but their discord is about who is the real prophet or who is last prophet and which book is the real words of God.
You should watch it frm someone who is indian historian..this video doesn't conveyed the horrors of the inquisition how they trapped the people there frm outside n how they killed n converted...
This story has been manipulated and maligned by hindutvas. History must be factual not speculation or biased to suit a special group to advance their interest. The story starts with caste system that was created by Indians especially the Brahmin who consider themselves at top of hierarchy.