The Worst Video on Live Vocal Processing Ever

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @DominicSanchez-z5p
    @DominicSanchez-z5p หลายเดือนก่อน

    U are a W. I’m a 23 year old studio engineer transitioning to live and this helps. Thanks bro.

  • @Drums4days
    @Drums4days ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey, great video. Im a drummer and I have a mindset that solves problems in a lot of different areas. I’ve been working with my church and they have asked me to be tech director. And during the process of doing things better I’ve learned that I really enjoy putting the puzzle pieces together to create something great. My question is how do I make the plunge into learning more and possibly turning a interest in to something I do for a living. Thanks again for all you do.

  • @joshuamathermusic
    @joshuamathermusic ปีที่แล้ว

    I really like this video style, keep it up! My solution has been to automate all my vocal fx in Ableton and running the wet signals only to their own FOH channel. That way I can automate them throughout the set however I want, and I can even run them to my own ears and 10-12ms of latency doesn't bother me since its just a wet channel separate from my dry mic in my ears. Love your videos, I've learned a ton from you! Thanks!

  • @daninunezz
    @daninunezz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, thank you very much. Super interesting alternative. That said, I agree that the most rock solid way to do this is with external processing and UA gear, but I do think that you can do this with Ableton processing too using zero latency plugins. I think that we have more than enough processing power to do it and in a live setting and most vocal performers that are used to sing with AT are even used to a little latency. I use an Ableton setup live exclusively for main and background vocals in my band and we experience even less latency compared to our previous setup based on Tc Helicon Voiceplay vocal multi effect pedals. I know it is not optimal compared to an Uad setup but I think that an Ableton processing deep dive would be very useful for people with setups like mine. At the end of the day I spent a lot of money in plugins and iConnectivity Interfaces to switch to the very very expensive UAD counterparts and then extra interfaces 😅. I understand that you can't make everyone happy and that these content is a very small niche already, so I want to take this opportunity to thank you for your content, you're clearly the best content creator out there putting out useful videos and courses about theses topics in such an in depth manner. Keep the good work up!

    • @fromstudiotostage
      @fromstudiotostage  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dani-I think you're right, there's still a need for "how to do this with ableton". I have two Ableton vocal processing courses on the list and both will feature the 4C as a big component to that. There's still a need for it-for sure.
      Two things I would still encourage folks to consider is:
      1-Consider a dedicated computer for vocal processing... "Division of Labor" rewards you with things that consistently work and cause less problems
      2-Always consider redundancy.. we've got to have an answer for what if and hope isn't a good backup plan.
      You can certainly ignore both 1 & 2 and it works but respecting 1 & 2 will let you go further.
      I appreciate the comment Dani!

    • @Delta0001-y
      @Delta0001-y ปีที่แล้ว

      Just make sure your zero latency plugins are stable! My chain had JST Grain Reduction 2 on and it caused Ableton to crash once (went through the crash report).

  • @thealtlife8984
    @thealtlife8984 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dude your videos are gold. I feel like I’m stealing industry secrets from the pros lol. I’d love to see a gear demo of what to use for switching redundant computers for tracks. Is it the same radial set up?

    • @fromstudiotostage
      @fromstudiotostage  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      PA12, SW-8, prodigy MP/MC, Exbox.md … check out all the courses on the site for an in-depth breakdown of each

  • @TSTBand
    @TSTBand ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello Sir! First of all thank you for the video explanation, it really helps to know new things like the ones you explain. Now my question would be, seems that the Arrow works well for 1 vocalist in stereo, or 2 in mono taking in consideration the amount of input and outputs that it have, but what if you have a band with 4 singers that need live vocal proccess?... thanks!

    • @fromstudiotostage
      @fromstudiotostage  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      UA has higher input interfaces if you need it more inputs.

  • @maxamilly738
    @maxamilly738 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Super helpful 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

  • @rappy007
    @rappy007 ปีที่แล้ว

    I will buy a course just because you featured a Star Wars mug. This is the way.

  • @tomashcroft7024
    @tomashcroft7024 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for this. Do you believe if you have an M1 Macbook that this is still needed for live vocal processing?

  • @hereticvice3397
    @hereticvice3397 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m using a Mac mini 2018 i5 MainStage 3 and a Motu M 4 for live processing. I’m in the Hobby punk alt noise world

  • @MajorMoment
    @MajorMoment ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Will! One of your course students here. Came across a problem I can't seem to solve. The setup works for one vocalist, but what happens if you have two or more? I bought an Apollo x4 (4 MIC inputs, plenty of outputs) and no matter what I try, reverb / dly effects from aux buses (related to Mic 1, connected to Input 1) bleed into other outputs dedicated for the second / third / fourth vocalists, as it seems that Aux buses cannot be panned / routed to outputs or Cues to only send effects of the corresponding vocalist. Since AUD limit you (pretty much in everything, but in this case, specifically) with only 2 aux buses, I have Vocalist 1's reverb / dly's in everyone else's signal and everyone else's reverb's in Vocalist one's output channel. Which is obviously less than ideal to give FOH a channel that also has everyone's reverb & delay effects on top of the main vocalist's of that channel dry & wet signals. What would be the solution to the problem?

    • @fromstudiotostage
      @fromstudiotostage  ปีที่แล้ว

      let's chat on the monthly call about this one!

    • @MajorMoment
      @MajorMoment ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fromstudiotostage sure, sadly we have a festival gig in 10 days so reverb & delay automation plans had to be axed for this one.

  • @jakeleistra2195
    @jakeleistra2195 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video! I’m currently using the audio 4c and play audio 12 to run tracks and process vocals. Now I’m interested into looking at the UAD gear. I don’t believe the UAD interfaces have any midi I/O though, which is a bummer as I have a tascam TA-1VP that I mainly use for tuning. My audio 4C controls that unit via midi. I wish I could use the tascam to tune and an Apollo interface to automate delay throws but don’t necessarily want to add another piece of gear onto the weight of the rack. Maybe I should sacrifice the tascam for the Apollo?

    • @jcalmade
      @jcalmade ปีที่แล้ว

      Check out UA midi control!

    • @fromstudiotostage
      @fromstudiotostage  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes! Use AutoTune Realtime Advanced with UAD and check out my courses:
      fromstudiotostage.com/courses/real-time-vocal-processing-with-uad-and-ableton-live/
      and don't forget to consider making it redundant:
      fromstudiotostage.com/courses/redundant-real-time-vocal-processing-with-universal-audio-interfaces-and-ableton-live/

  • @jonfunnell1224
    @jonfunnell1224 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you simply have a one computer and one Arrow interface set up and your doing this Live Autotune thru Console... What is the optimal way to send your microphone signal to FOH from the Arrow? Do you just use one of the L/R monitor Outs on the back of the Arrow to send to FOH as your microphone output? I'm a little lost on the In's and Out's of it all. Bit of a noob. Thank you.

    • @fromstudiotostage
      @fromstudiotostage  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes-connect your interface directly to your console. These courses will help:
      fromstudiotostage.com/categories/vocal-processing

  • @RufusRoss
    @RufusRoss ปีที่แล้ว

    I love Ableton.
    But… For stage and live use …
    Gig Performer is all you need.
    Vst2
    Vst3
    Au
    Low latency and low Cpu
    I really dig the routing and midi capabilities.
    The UI kinda sucks but who need flashy graphics anyway

    • @fromstudiotostage
      @fromstudiotostage  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you found a good solution! Ableton is always my go to

  • @carverlouismusic
    @carverlouismusic ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Will! I’m curious. If I were to run tracks and do vocal processing. Would I be able to use the Apollo and Ableton 11 together, and map via midi inside of Ableton to change to the exact key of the song? I know this is possible with Antares. Just wondering if UA is capable so that I can take some stress off of my Mac. Thank you for the time!

    • @fromstudiotostage
      @fromstudiotostage  ปีที่แล้ว

      I show this process step by step in my vocal processing courses

  • @BenSpivakMusic
    @BenSpivakMusic ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this video! Do you recommend running your vocal processing on a separate laptop from playback? If so how would you run 3 laptops simultaneously (assuming 2 for redundant play back and 1 - for now - for vocal processing) with the same midi controller?