I remember being in Mecca, hearing a different Qira’a casually playing on the TV. And David Wood is out here trynna make it seem like it’s a huge deal. 😂
I don't understand. This topic has been explained to DW a thousand times, yet this is what he comes back for? I think DW is addicted to self humiliation
He doesn't care about the truth. This is literally his work, this is his career, he makes money off of it and good money at it too. Compared to someone like Shaykh Uthman Ibn Farouq or Farid, they don't make money off these videos, they're not even monetized. David Wood, Apuss, and others on the other hand...
if you keep bringing up the contention the aim is that just making the claim at face value is damaging and that people (new Muslims, non Muslims who haven’t heard the response) will now be curious and doubtful, especially the casual watchers who won’t go watch the detailed explanations clearing the misconceptions up
@@InshalHassan-r4s there is no doubt that islam is the fastest growing religion on birthrate not in conversion accept the reality hahahaahahahahaha tsunami of apostasy
David is really an embarrassment to Christians he and Christian prince an all those ex Muslims really think that they know it all they tore up qurans making fun of our religion laugh about it this is all emotional he should really concentrate on his own life the more they islam bad the more Allah show them that their hearts is cold inside and out they not even better than anyone else they must really hate it when Christians revert to muslim stop hating on Muslims David be glad no one tore up your Bible yet shows u we respectful more than u christians
But I thought there was only 1 quran!? That narrative was used for years until it got debunked by people like dw. So don't act like it's always been accepted and known
@@nikodemus6315 There is a difference between style of recitation and version; people like David Wood didn't know because of his arrogance and ignorance, I knew this at the age of 10 so your claim is baseless whatsoever; take your Islamophobia out of here
Fake Christians,Fake Jews,Hindus,Atheist,Spirituals,Satanist will all serve Al-dajjal/AntiChrist against people who follow God. APU and david wood are actually symbolic representation of First and Second AntiChrist from Bible.
This is due to the fact that they are following the "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" Something that is only followed if one is desperate, AKA Christians like David
DW is shameless. Taking Yasir Completely out of context, seriously filthy. Yasir was not contradicting himself he was simply referring to how the Quran was standardized. Spelling had to be standardized, scribal errors had to be corrected etc. The Qur'an is a primary source material the bible is secondary source material, most people have no idea about the difference, The Qur'an is the only scripture in history to be primary source material.
Yasir Qadhi is a facilitator for people like DW, Yasir is already absorbed and endorsed the narrative of the orientalists at Yale university, and now he is propagating it subtly through his lessons.
"a sheep ate Quran pages therefore some of the Quran is forever lost" Aside from the haddith being weak, David ate some pages of the Quran does he think we lost some of the Quran because of him
When someone brings up this claim, we should ask them, 'what type of paper was supposedly eaten?' The predecessor to modern style weak paper was introduced to the Abbasids via the Chinese through the battle of Talas, centuries after the Prophet pbuh passed away. If it wasn't our modern understanding of paper then it could be- 1. Parchment paper- This is just dried animal skin. 2. Papyrus- Which is woven strips of papyrus leaves. Although it was used in ancient Egypt, it wasn't that common in Arabia.
ikr does he think there was only 1 copy and it was eaten and there were no other copies of the same thing.also people who do hafz will prevent the quran from getting lost because they will remember the whole of quran in their head
It’s funny how David goes on a long spiel on how da’wah people are lying and then shows a bunch of clips of them talking about the truth of the different qiraat.
@@beenpimin638 Dude, I read and understand Arabic, that's why David's argument is so pathetic; you are the one that does not understand because of your lack of knowledge and ignorance so get out of here if you're going to spit blasphemy
@@S0NUS8962 dude come on this has been done. The warsh and haffs qurans have different arabic words. Just google different arabic qurans and you can see them. Why are muslims so dishonest
@@iknew8082 christianity is literally a cult of judaism, based on a myth of three gods putting a blood sacrifice suicide on one. Islam is the only true religion of all the prophets, that explains everything coherently and makes sense.
@@Kinderlieder-Kindergeschichte Muslim literally adopted the Bible’s beliefs, you saying its not right them making sacrifices with blood then your denying your muslim beliefs too since they claim to be worshipping the God what of Abraham .
@@iknew8082 what are you talking about, did you watch the whole video? How can you stand by wood after al these childish nonsense he gets smoked every single time
Yeah i doubt hammertime is mad. All he cares about is content. His audience members aren't exactly writing dissertations. As long as he's got hot topics to milk for views he can pay his bills.
Everything about his collaboration with apuss is just bizarre and absolutely pathetic. Just to put things into perspective, imagine one of our du’aat started partaking in similar collaborations with some ex-Christian atheist. It wouldn’t take long before we question what kind of Dawah they are doing and shunning them all together. Everything about this looks absolutely desperate and weak. I’m sure he realizes it as well. It’s just about views and money at this point, not loyalty to any tradition.
@@AbuHaroonSyed man for real David wood is very lost man. His audience are like sheeps. If a Muslim speaker work with an atheist, no Muslim will listen to them
I don't think Wood being an admitted sociopath really makes what he says completely invalid, though he definitely gets things wrong and seems obsessed with talking about Islam despite being a supposed Christian who should be talking more about his own gospel.
11:54 Yasir Qadhi is a facilitator for people like DW. Yasir is already absorbed and endorsed the falsehoods of the orientalists at Yale university, and now he is propagating it subtly through his lessons.
He is a part of Yaqeen institute. The institute that supports homosexuality and is currently trying to establish free mixing in mosques. Christians should find a better 'scholar' who supports their claims.
That is why Western universities create such fake scholars like YQ, then elevate their stature over traditional scholars, so they can use them to propagate their falsehoods. Don't ever trust anyone studying Islam in a Western university.
Quotes are David's claim paraphrased 3:44 - "Da'wah is what Jihadis do when they're too weak to fight" 5:11 - "There's more than one version of the Qur'an" 8:21 - "Muslim du'aat lie to laymen about there being different versions of the Qur'an" 14:10 - Did YQ contradict himself in the two clips David played? 29:00 - We don't let go of lies whether it's from Muslims or non-Muslims 30:27 - Shabbir Ally's clip on Qur'an preservation 34:34 - "Sana' manuscript refutes that Qur'an has been preserved" 41:13 - *Ijaaz joins* 43:12 - The literature on Sana' manuscript speculates that the manuscript might be commentary, not a mushaf 45:40 - David needs to stop being 47:40 - "Average Muslims blindly parrot 'scholars'" 51:56 - "Your scholars are liars" 52:53 - "I wouldn't trust a lying Christian scholar" - David Wood 2023 (student of CP) 55:33 - "Parts of the Qur'an were lost" 59:11 - "Companions couldn't agree on what should be included in the Qur'an" 1:00:29 - "Ubayy ibn Ka'b believed there should be 116 chapters in the Qur'an" 1:01:43 - "Uthman burnt mushaf to cover the differences" 1:02:24 - "Average Muslim follows lying scholars" 1:03:50 - "Muslims want to bring converts by lying" 1:04:29 - "Converts like Sneako are being lied to" 1:07:31 - Q&A
What about the Prophet of Islam making lapses while delivering Allah's "devine" revelation? Notice how a random reciter reminded Muhammad of Allah's message 👇 Sahih Muslim 788a 'A'isha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) heard a person reciting the Qur'an at night. Upon this he said: May Allah show mercy to him; he has reminded me of such and such a verse which I had missed in such and such a surah.
I love you for the sake of Allah my brother Farid. May almighty Allah swt grant y you a long and healthy life so that you can continue to fight 🔨 boy. ❤️ 🇿🇦
Brother Farid you truly live up to your name. You have the most complete and compelling arguments. May Allah bless you and your family for all your efforts
Muslims rule India for over 500 years, yet the Hindus were in majority and still are, so goes his argument down the drain. There were no armies sent to Indonesia and Malaysia, yet Muslims are in the majority in these countries.
Correction it was 1000 years as the Muslim rule in India started with Muslims conquering Pakistan and then Mahmoud of ghaznavi And Muhammad of ghor conquering northern India and Bangladesh but if you include Muslim rule of India to be from the time of Muhammad of ghor then it’s 800 years of Muslim rule in India . And not just India the ottoman Muslims ruled the Balkan Christian states for 500 years. And yet most of the balkan countries identify as Christians. So Muslim rule in the balkans and India is enough to refute that Liberalcucktian.
@@loyaltyoverlove9374 what scholars yasir & Shabir are not scholars they’re preachers you goof maybe watch the video again for your feeble brain. Farid refutes David wood directly and condemns the mistake the preachers have made. Unlike your book with zero known authors and zero first century manuscripts 😂😂😂😂 300 years later after Jesus voting on whaat god is but keep listening to the man who tried to kill his father with a hammer
For arguments sake lets say the Quran isn't preserved than we are back to square one where both religions holy books aren't preserved so what do we do now? do we all become Atheists??????
The whole Levant, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine and Jordan, was still 50% Christian during the 1200s, it only became majority Muslim after the Mamluk wars vs the crusaders and Mongols So that’s by the 1300s, 600 years it took for Muslims to become majority Shows you there was always Islamic religious tolerance.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي الكريم فريد مع كل الاحترام والتقدير لكم ولعلمكم الاختلاف بين القراءات نوعين لا ثالث لهما الاول ان تختلف القراءتان في اللفظ وتتفقا في المعنى مثل اهدنا الصراط واهدنا السراط ومثل مالك وملك والنوع الثاني ان تختلف القراءتان في اللفظ والمعنى معا مع صحة المعنيين كليهما فلا يكونان متناقضين ولا متعارضين مثل قول الله وانظر الى العظام كيف ننشزهاثم نكسوها لحما قرئ ننشزها بالزاء ومعناها تضم بعضا الى بعض حتى تلتئم وتجتمع وقرئ بالراء معناها نحييها بعد الموت للحساب والمعنيان مختلفان ولكنهما لا يتناقضان ولا يتنافيان بل يلتقيان لان الله اذا اراد بعث الخلائق ضم عظامهم بعضها الى بعض حتى تجتمع ثم يحييها للجزاء اما اختلاف القرائتين في اللفظ والمعنى مع تضاد المعنيين وتضارب الهدفين فلا اثر له في القران الكريم بالنسبة لأجاز فهو لا يملك العلم الكافي في الاسلام وله اخطاء كثيره جدا خصوصي عندما تحدث في السابق بشكل جاهل جدا عن الاحرف السبعة والقراءات العشرة. للاسف هو متخصص في كتاب النصارى ومتعمق جدا في النصرانية حاله كحال معظم الدعاة في بريطانيا في ركن المحاورين بلندن لا يملكون العلم الكافي للرد على الشبهات الا بعلم الفلسفة علم الكلام ويقدموا العقل على النقل لانهم لا يملكوا العلم الكافي في النقل القران والسنة النبوية . بارك الله فيكم ونفع الله بكم وبعلمكم
هو اختلاف تنوع و ليس اختلاف تضاد, فالامام السيوطي اورد في كتابه الاتقان الشروط اللازمة لحدوث التناقض و هي مستمدة من علم المنطق, و هم تقريباً نفس الاوجهه التي يستخدمها علماء الاصول و تسمي النسب الحكمية, فالقران لم يتناقض في اصول العقيدة فالله واحد و محمد رسوله عليه الصلاة و السلام, و لم يتناقض في القصص كونها اخبار, و الخلاف الفقهي هو خلاف ظني يكون بمرجح من القران او السنة, و الايات المتشابهات معظمها ايات في صفات الله عز وجل و من المنطقي ان تكون موجودة لان الله ليس كمثله شئ و عقول الناس متفاوتة في الادراك فتشتبه عليهم
I think its charitable to see that Sh YQ was saying that there has not been any changes from mushaf tradition from the time of the compilation & distribution and was simplifying the preservation. I dont think he was even trying to address the Qiraat issue and not trying to lie about it at all..
can you be specific which part of the quran matter/subject being lied about from islamic scholars? but no one can denied there are multiple bible version, contradicting each other, even contradicting within one version of Bible, majority scholar today and from the past hold position Bible has been redacting/revised from different anonymous authors. That ( Bible) cannot possibly words from God.
To be perfectly honest this point is really shallow when picked with a fine comb because I can that with anyone I don’t like. “Look this guy was quoted by David Wood.”
So Farid you don't believe all Qurans in the world today are exactly the same, word for word? If so, who told Sneako that? I believe that's how you guys have defined the Quran as perfectly preserved
@@youtuber9668 Can you be clear? Are you saying there are two different Qurans that have different WORDS in them today? Or are you remaining resolute in the classic claim that no two qurans in the world have different words or dots in them in the world today?
@@steelisrael3461 What Farid is saying and what all our scholars for the past over thousand years have been saying is that the Quran was revealed in seven ahruf directly from the prophet pbuh. So all the variations of the words are all direct revelation from God since we got them from the prophet pbuh. No one scholar has ever said there is no word variation in the Quran but all affirm that the variations themselves are Quran and you can use any of the variation since they are all Quran. We have always done this and we still do this to this day, many people know all the recitations by heart. We have chains of memorizations for all recitations with their word variations and all the chains lead back to the prophet pbuh himself. Ibn ‘Abbaas who narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Jibreel taught me one style and I reviewed it until he taught me more, and I kept asking him for more and he gave me more until finally there were seven styles.” (narrated by al-Bukhaari, 3047; Muslim, 819) The two most authentic books of Hadith ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab who said: “I heard Hishaam ibn Hakeem reciting Soorat al-Furqaan in a manner different from that in which I used to recite it and the way in which the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) taught me to recite it. I was about to argue with him whilst he was praying, but I waited until he finished his prayer, and then I tied his garment around his neck and seized him by it and brought him to the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and said, ‘O Messenger of Allaah, I heard this man reciting Soorat-al-Furqaan in a way different to the way you taught it to me.’ The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to him, ‘Recite it,’ and he recited it as I had heard him recite it. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, ‘It was revealed like this.’ Then he said to me, ‘Recite it,’ so I recited it and he said, ‘It was revealed like this.’ This Qur'aan has been revealed in seven different ways, so recite it in the way that is easiest for you.’” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 2287; Muslim, 818)
If Quran has ever been changed, even with a word… than it would automatically show up a contradiction in it. Just a statement like this is enough to destroy these pagan.
According to the history of quran, there is no change. Its in the language of Quraish as it was revealed to prophet pbuh. Like the national anthem, every level singging the same lyric/melody till present day.
There is a famous quote by a rabbi said that "Christianity is like pig, appears to be kosher but it is not" That is why according to orthodox Jewish it is prohibited to be inside a church or pass by it, because Christians worship multiple gods not one. However, Jews can pray in a Muslim mosque as long as their niche is towards Jerusalem, because Muslims believe in absolute monotheism.
Can someone explain 2 things to me. If nothing can immitate quran, how did those erroneous Quran's get to be? Second, in this video in minute 20:00 it says Yasser says Uthman said destroy the Qurans that were 8 or 9 generations old. There was no 8 generations of Muslims during Uthman's time?
He just made a mistake with his tongue by speaking fast, also ur first question, unno what ur asking exactly but if it's to do with copiest errors then that's the answer. Every Tom, John and Harry started writing and copying the Quran without no editors to makes sure there isn't mistakes, so Uthman being the Scholar he is ordered for the standardization of the Quran and thank God he did. Remember, Uthman is the husband of the Prophet's daughters, he isn't just anybody. That standard copy then go distributed everywhere and was made sure the copies were properly being done.
@@runimcomingforyou.4505 My question is, actually 2 of them, Farid said that Uthmam said to bring all bad Qurans to burn from 8-9 generations but Uthman was the first generation himself, there were no generations before him in Islam. And 2, If no one can create a sura like Quran, how did people with the wrong Qurans believe in it?
@@tonydimera282 I just answered the Yasir, he does this often where he talks fast and makes mistakes in his speech, we all do that. Of course there were no 9 generations of Muslim by then. Who is creating a Surah like Quran? Where on earth did you get that idea from?
I always thought that the notion that it was 100% dot for dot was true but didn't really think anything of it. Inshallah I'll watch that Playlist you mentioned. Informative video, worth it to subscribe.
Most laymen Muslims aren't aware that the Quran comes in different ahruf and to be fair they also don't need to, knowing one qira'a is sufficient for anyone memorizing the Quran.
The Muslims in this comment section are so delusional, even faced with clear proof that someone is contradicting themselves, they choose to ignore it and make excuses 🤦♂️
I'm surprised no one is commenting on this, but I found it incredibly shameful that many Muslims were not able to pick up the contradiction on the first watch. Even without context the error was clear, and the context just made it worse since it contained other mistakes and oversimplifications. I encourage all of you to read more about the preservation of the Quran. Yaqeen wrote several excellent articles on this topic, but if we're going to engage with Christians, we should avoid looking like fools by turning a blind eye to an extremely obvious contradiction.
For me its like we got the context of the white BG video and then still ignoringed it. For me he was explaining that Qurans before Uthman compiled it hat copy errors and such, and after he made a standardized version, there was none, because everybody copied from this version.
You will find difference between warsh and hafs and that isn’t a problem since it was there since day one and it was accepted You will never see a warsh Quran having difference with another warsh Quran or hafs Quran having difference with another hafs Quran that what was meant by unchanged 😊❤
Yup. That's right. But what the christians do was comparing warsh against hafs or against dhuri. Of course the letter differs according to their dialect but the message intact.
13:20 if the suckling and stoning verses were revelations from Allah why didn’t they make it in the Quran? That proves you don’t have all the verses from the “eternal” Quran
With my knowledge about qira’at (with your help and my own research) I understand what Yasir Qadhi is saying in the white background video. He’s comparing the preservation of the Quran for a specific qira’a compared to the bible. He’s not mentioning other qira’at because in his mind it will confuse his audience and may cause a fitna. I wholeheartedly disagree with this approach to shield an audience from this but I would not call him a liar in this instance.
YQ is a modernist reformer who is now accepted by shi'a. He said himself that he wants to bring orthodox muslims to his reformist, lgbt-accepting movement. He even declared himself mufti for north america.
@@xenomorphisisdilage472 also check out what Dr. Zakir Naik and Farid say about YQ statments regarding Qur'an preservation, he's clearly a mole now, changed from orthodox to shi'a loving abrahamic faith guy, also he admitted studying Islamic politics (or something similar) under Tony Blair, about whom he said, some of his speech is sorcery (sihr).
I think that yaasir was talking about the skeletal text in the video with the white background. And in the other one he spoke about the different mushaf.
نحن المسلمون تلقينا القرآن الكريم بالنقل الشفهي والتواتر وليس بالنسخ. نحن على دراية بمخطوطات صنعاء. الأشخاص الذين كتبوا مخطوطات صنعاء ليسوا كاملين وارتكبوا أخطاء في النسخ أدت إلى الانحراف عن الأصل وهذا الانحراف لا يغير من الأصل بشئ الذي يحفظه المسلمون عن ظهر قلب. انت تريد أن تفرض على المسلمين أن أخطاء النسخ هي تحريف في الأصل ولم يتم حفظ القرآن. جاء النقل الشفوي للقرآن الكريم قبل كتابة ونسخ القرآن الكريم.بفترة طويلة. إنك تحاول أن تقول إن كتابة ونسخ القرآن الكريم الذي جاء بعد وقت طويل من النقل الشفوي للقرآن دليل على عدم حفظ القرآن. إنك تحاول جاهدًا الحكم على النقل الشفوي للقرآن الكريم وفقًا لكتابة ونسخ القرآن الكريم. عليك أن تحكم على كتابة النسخ للقرآن الكريم وفقًا للنقل الشفوي للقران لأن النقل الشفوي جاء أولا وهو الأصل وليس العكس. أنت تحاول الحكم على الأصل وفقًا لكتابة ونسخ القران وهذا خطأ. نحن نعتمد على النقل الشفهي القادم من النبي محمد ص إلى أصحابه حتى اليوم وليس على المخطوطات مثل المسيحيين
النقل الشفهي هو الاساس لانه حتي مع وجود مخطوطات عثمان رضي الله عنه للقران و هي المصاحف فهي كانت مكتوبة بخطوط غير منقوطة و كان يلزم لقرائتها ان يكون حافظ القران يعلمه شفاهية اولاً لانه بغير ذلك لن يستطيع قرائته, اي ان النقل الشفهي كان هو الاساس, ثانياً المسلمون لا ياخذون باي مخطوطة ما لم يكون لها اسناد وهذا يطبق في كتب الائمة و الفقهاء وغيرهم في توضيح اسناد الكتاب, فما بالك بمخطوطات مجهولة للقران, و من المعروف بان بعض الصحابة كانوا يعلقون في هوامش المصحف بكلمات تفسيرية و غيرها و كانوا يأمنون من حدوث الخطأ لان الكل كان علي دراية بالقراءات الصحيحة, المستشرقون الغربييون يريدون اسقاط الطرق و المنهجية التي استخدمها علماء الاسلام خاصة علوم الحديث والاحتكام الي اساليبهم و طرقهم التي معظمها مزيفة ثم يستخدمونها في اعادة بناء القران و تفسيره وفق منطقهم و هذا اشبه بطرق الفرق الباطنية و تفاسيرهم
Sigh, Farid. You just gave the missionaries a golden clip by using the word lie as you will allow them to use that as a seal of approval in their next lying video.
It's so amusing how these Paulytheists project the accusation of lying, knowing their whole religion is built on lies, promulgated by a self appointed "Apostle" who admitted lying, and justified his lies. These people are munafiqeen of the highest level.
I am not an expert in this by any means. I think the most charitable way to address this controversy is to think of a teacher talking with students. If they are in middle school he describes electrons in a simplistic way. It is OK for them to imagine electrons as small balls orbiting around a large ball. Physics students in university study the nature of electrons in a more detailed way.
@@mtsheikh1147 The sacrifice of our Lord Jesus is for the fulfillment of Jehovah's prophecies in the Old Testament that Jehovah will be speared Zechariah 12:10 and Psalms 22:16, 17 and will be summoned to court Isaiah 53 and will be born through a virgin who is God. He is mighty, Isaiah 9:6 and... I love my Lord because he loves us like his son, not like a slave and master Quran 19:88, 93! Seek Jesus and find the truth
@@mtsheikh1147 Well, congratulations, Satan has led you astray and you have found a false Jesus! Even if your fathers are close friends of Muhammad, it doesn't matter because Muhammad spreads the false Jesus and he's antichrist ! I pray that you will find the real Jesus to reach eternal life. Believe me, kissing and touching the black stone will not send you to heaven. If Muhammad did that, then you should doubt Muhammad, why! Where even in the Quran did Abraham go to Mecca? Even if Abraham built the black stone, why didn't all the prophets pay attention to the black stone and they go to Jerusalem?! Ask yourself these questions! I hope you seek and find the Real Jesus (the jesus who is a prophet or Muslim is a false jesus) and discover eternal life and heaven because Jesus is the Only Way and no one else! And I pray for you 🙏:)
lol bunch of muslims pulling the good old "we don't know the context" and then if you know the context and you don't agree with what your muslim brother is speakng then you call him a kafir. dawah is literally a joke at this point.
@@ZiIIousLol from your response, you sound lost for words and confused! Anyway, read how Muhammad himself made lapses while delivering Allah's devine revelation! Notice a random reciter reminding Allah's Messenger of his devine message 👇 Sahih Muslim 788a 'A'isha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) heard a person reciting the Qur'an at night. Upon this he said: May Allah show mercy to him; he has reminded me of such and such a verse which I had missed in such and such a surah.
@@delmanorshun2471 You are the confused. Quran(87:6): "We will have you recite ˹the Quran, O Prophet,˺ so you will not forget ˹any of it˺," After this verse was revealed, he has never forgotten a verse. Anything you bring up has already been answered online, so go do your research.
@@ZiIIous Nope! Don't concoct your own excuse here! Are you saying Allah himself forgot to LET Muhammad avoid mistakes right from the beginning? Along the road, did Muhammad complained to Allah about his forgetful problems that made Allah to reveal the Quranic verse you posted? You blatantly LIED by claiming this issue have been dealt with by scholars Can you give any link or reference on any Islamic scholar that support your claim?
@@ZiIIous Abdul You posted that Quranic verse without the ending context.... Here is it in full 👇 Quran (87:6) We shall make you recite and then you will not forget, (87:7) except what Allah should wish. Do you have any arguments 😂🤣😂
He didn't upload this video for us but to specifically target Sneako since he is newly reverted. Little he know how dumb he sounds whenever he speaks about Islam.
@@user-xd9sq4sz3f Stating facts and dubbing it "comedy" shows how delusional you are, we have so many proof of contradictions and no proof of proper documentation of the Bible that we're sick of them, go ahead and show us 1 proof that the Quran has a contradiction, and let the comedy ensue as the Christian talks about scripture authenticity and corruption.
Just to be sure Farid do you mean the differences in the Magrihb region are because they trace back to one of the Qirat from the prophet pbuh? I thought all the others other than the Qurayshi Qirat died out when the mushaf was standardized? Also about the different words is that true? and do they change the meaning? This is a genuine question if you could help me out with the brother.
@@FaridResponds okay will do now again one after another. I've watched them slowly as they came out I mighta missed it. But, if not I might ask again this was not clarified very well in the stream. Anyway thank you akhi also just wanted to make note of this. I didn't get a notification at all that you replied when i normally would have from other. I just happened to come back to the video and see the reply. Is this a form of censoring by youtube?
I can not listen to hammertime wood, just so repulsive. It feels like an insect making sticky squishy sounds and also looking very disgusting. May Allah help you brother Farid for enduring this for the sake of Allah and refuting the lies they spew out.
Lol! What lies is Farid refuting? Read Muhammad making lapses while delivering Allah's "devine" revelation...... Notice a random reciter reminding Muhammad of his lapses 👇 Sahih Muslim 788a 'A'isha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) heard a person reciting the Qur'an at night. Upon this he said: May Allah show mercy to him; he has reminded me of such and such a verse which I had missed in such and such a surah.
There is an easy explanation…. The Holy prophet (pbh) taught the Quran to the sahaba and whatever flowed from the Prophet to his companion was preserved…. all different accepted readings that are available today all come from the Holy prophet (pbh)….. for example, for the sake of argument, refer to the Hadith of 7 ahruf, if caliph omar(ra) had written his reading and likewise Hisham (ra) had written his reading then we would have two reading, different but yet verified by the prophet (pbh) himself. There is no contradiction here. Hence, we should look at the different readings from this point of view.
In a weird way, Yasir Qadhi is himself proof of the veracity of the Prophet Muhammad. Take any old clip of Yasir and you will find a new clip where he is inconsistent in his opinions. He definitely changed along the way and so much so that he seems to stand at a 180 degree turn on some matters. I'm not faulting him, but that is how people and their personalities develop. We forget our old opinions and may state something today totally different than in the past. Which is why the Prophet Muhammad PBUH, and the Qur'an are so remarkable. Even if we were to accept small changes here and there, whatever change that is claimed is very minor and does not contradict the core teachings or beliefs of Islam. The message stays consistent. It is this consistency that is truly remarkable. Had the Prophet Muhammad written the Qur'an in the manner that has been universally accepted in a piecemeal fashion, and in an order far different from the end form or any standard form or order (narrative, chronological, procedural etc), then the Qur'an would have been a garbled mess with no structure, no sense, no cohesion, no eloquence, and no consistency. Yet the Qur'an is far from those things, despite having a unique structure that any writer would find counterintuitive if one were attempting to be effectively consistent, cohesive, eloquent and comprehensible. It's hard enough writing a book over 23 years and being consistent while going along a linear progression. Now try writing a book over 23 years where the first 5 verses get added to the next 14, written years later and together they form the 96th chapter, such as Surat Al-Alaq. In that chapter, we are taught a number of facts, none of which contradict anything else in the Qur'an. 1)God created humans from Alaq 2)God teaches humans by the pen 3) Despite this gift, humans transgress 4) We will all return to God 5) The one who forbids a servant when he prays, God will drag him from his lying, sinning forelock 6) He will have no one to call upon.7) Do not obey him but bow to Allah. As stated, none of these pronouncements are contradicted in the Qur'an, and the rhythm of the verses is not broken despite the time gap between the two parts. Rather than finding contradictions, we find facts that are corroborated by knowledge and future events. The forelock, for example, is the frontal lobe and this is the place of lying in the brain. Abu Jahl, the "one who prevents a servant from praying" dies a polytheist and therefore was failed by those who he called upon besides Allah. Allah commands that the believers do not obey him, because of his eventual end in hell, which makes this a prophecy.
David is ignorant of the Quran. The Quran is a recitation and the writings can have variations in the spellings until it was put together in one holy book in line with the recitation given to the prophet pbuh, that is normal.
Lol! Muhammad himself made mistakes while reading the Quran! Read 👇 Sahih Muslim 788a 'A'isha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) heard a person reciting the Qur'an at night. Upon this he said: May Allah show mercy to him; he has reminded me of such and such a verse which I had missed in such and such a surah. Notice Muhammad being reminded by a random reciter 👆
People in contact with sneako should tell him to stop debating until he has knowledge, no disrespect but he still doesn’t know the basic ahkam he can’t be debating theology
Are we just gonna ignore the fact that the David Wood video has obvious clip editing? He's cut the video of Yasir Qadhi to make it sound like he said the Quran has changes In letters and words. Just watch his hand movements when he says this part.
Just finished watching this stream. Farid played both Yasir Qadhi with the full context. Turns out David was correct and Sneako incredibly uninformed. There is more than one version of the Quran objectively and factually.
I remember being in Mecca, hearing a different Qira’a casually playing on the TV. And David Wood is out here trynna make it seem like it’s a huge deal. 😂
Hes been repeating this same nonsense for years, his dumb followers ofc believes him
Standing before God in your judgment ,it will be
@@GTO_CAL bruh is making emotional commits hunder hevrry commit.
Plieze saarr, bleib meh, jeSUS died😵four hour senzzzz😡👇👇😐
@@GTO_CAL
I mean you’re not wrong, the Quran will come down and testify on behalf of the believers and they will be in heaven forever.
@@Kimeikus the bible will, the Quran won't..that book is the word of man
The bible is the word of God. . scripture says it
I don't understand. This topic has been explained to DW a thousand times, yet this is what he comes back for? I think DW is addicted to self humiliation
Repetition, repetition, that is how propaganda and falsehoods by those people work, they are only doing propaganda nothing else.
DW got paid to do this. thats why. he needs the view counts. what else to do. islamophobes career paid well.
He’s a masochist like his “god”
He doesn't care about the truth. This is literally his work, this is his career, he makes money off of it and good money at it too. Compared to someone like Shaykh Uthman Ibn Farouq or Farid, they don't make money off these videos, they're not even monetized. David Wood, Apuss, and others on the other hand...
if you keep bringing up the contention the aim is that just making the claim at face value is damaging and that people (new Muslims, non Muslims who haven’t heard the response) will now be curious and doubtful, especially the casual watchers who won’t go watch the detailed explanations clearing the misconceptions up
Christian should be the last one's talking about scripture corruption
Our scripture is not corrupt and every argument of that has been debunked
@@calmwithchrist Stop the 🧢
@@calmwithchristthis is a horrid rebuttal
@@Borz.0011 nothing to cap about it's simply facts
@@SlugRiot how so?
everytime David Wood opens his mouth, Islam gains 20 new reverts.
like 16,000 leaving islam per day ??? :D
@@novaanimereview2838 lol 😂 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@novaanimereview2838 And more of them Convert every day? Huh hypocrite?
@@InshalHassan-r4s there is no doubt that islam is the fastest growing religion on birthrate not in conversion accept the reality hahahaahahahahaha tsunami of apostasy
Your scholars was just caught lying and u still defending him 🤡
I'm an average Muslim. I read in Hafs, but enjoy listening to Warsh and Khalaf too.
David, move on. You've got nothing. You've lost life.
David is really an embarrassment to Christians he and Christian prince an all those ex Muslims really think that they know it all they tore up qurans making fun of our religion laugh about it this is all emotional he should really concentrate on his own life the more they islam bad the more Allah show them that their hearts is cold inside and out they not even better than anyone else they must really hate it when Christians revert to muslim stop hating on Muslims David be glad no one tore up your Bible yet shows u we respectful more than u christians
But I thought there was only 1 quran!? That narrative was used for years until it got debunked by people like dw. So don't act like it's always been accepted and known
@@nikodemus6315 There is a difference between style of recitation and version; people like David Wood didn't know because of his arrogance and ignorance, I knew this at the age of 10 so your claim is baseless whatsoever; take your Islamophobia out of here
Perfectly preserved 😂😂😂😂
@@geoffers396
Yeah that's why your Bibles got 73 books, 66 books, 84 books...
Christian teams up with atheist to come after a new Muslim!😂
Fake Christians,Fake Jews,Hindus,Atheist,Spirituals,Satanist will all serve Al-dajjal/AntiChrist against people who follow God.
APU and david wood are actually symbolic representation of First and Second AntiChrist from Bible.
The atheist is a fool according to his book😂
Thats how u will souls ,Jesus did it
This is due to the fact that they are following the "The enemy of my enemy is my friend"
Something that is only followed if one is desperate, AKA Christians like David
desperate
DW is shameless. Taking Yasir Completely out of context, seriously filthy. Yasir was not contradicting himself he was simply referring to how the Quran was standardized. Spelling had to be standardized, scribal errors had to be corrected etc. The Qur'an is a primary source material the bible is secondary source material, most people have no idea about the difference, The Qur'an is the only scripture in history to be primary source material.
Yasir Qadhi is a facilitator for people like DW, Yasir is already absorbed and endorsed the narrative of the orientalists at Yale university, and now he is propagating it subtly through his lessons.
*Yasir qadhi is not a scholar! He is a fraud who rejects Quranic Preservation like the shias mushrikeen!*
Salam coach. Inshallah your back is better now. الله يشفيك
the legend ❤
Ayooo 💙
"a sheep ate Quran pages therefore some of the Quran is forever lost"
Aside from the haddith being weak, David ate some pages of the Quran does he think we lost some of the Quran because of him
When someone brings up this claim, we should ask them, 'what type of paper was supposedly eaten?'
The predecessor to modern style weak paper was introduced to the Abbasids via the Chinese through the battle of Talas, centuries after the Prophet pbuh passed away.
If it wasn't our modern understanding of paper then it could be-
1. Parchment paper- This is just dried animal skin.
2. Papyrus- Which is woven strips of papyrus leaves. Although it was used in ancient Egypt, it wasn't that common in Arabia.
@@ezazahmed8379 Why'd you send your comment that many times? Delete all the unnecessary comments lol.
@Run, I'm coming for you. I don't know how that happened but I'll remove them
ikr does he think there was only 1 copy and it was eaten and there were no other copies of the same thing.also people who do hafz will prevent the quran from getting lost because they will remember the whole of quran in their head
It’s funny how David goes on a long spiel on how da’wah people are lying and then shows a bunch of clips of them talking about the truth of the different qiraat.
You never understood.
@@beenpimin638 Dude, I read and understand Arabic, that's why David's argument is so pathetic; you are the one that does not understand because of your lack of knowledge and ignorance so get out of here if you're going to spit blasphemy
So there are different arabic qurans then??
@@ericsonofjohn9384 Open challenge to you or any other Christian in the world that can bring me a Qur'an that has a single letter different to another
@@S0NUS8962 dude come on this has been done. The warsh and haffs qurans have different arabic words. Just google different arabic qurans and you can see them. Why are muslims so dishonest
So David the cross dresser and Apussy the anxiety patient come out of retirement for their annual humiliation 😂
they had high hopes of finally winning a battle, 2vs1 against an american who studied Islam for like 2 weeks.
@@Kinderlieder-Kindergeschichte or Saving him from a cult , maybe its too late for them
@@iknew8082 christianity is literally a cult of judaism, based on a myth of three gods putting a blood sacrifice suicide on one. Islam is the only true religion of all the prophets, that explains everything coherently and makes sense.
@@Kinderlieder-Kindergeschichte Muslim literally adopted the Bible’s beliefs, you saying its not right them making sacrifices with blood then your denying your muslim beliefs too since they claim to be worshipping the God what of Abraham .
@@iknew8082 what are you talking about, did you watch the whole video? How can you stand by wood after al these childish nonsense he gets smoked every single time
Yeah i doubt hammertime is mad. All he cares about is content. His audience members aren't exactly writing dissertations.
As long as he's got hot topics to milk for views he can pay his bills.
Exactly ! Why whould they even care if it's all lies the more lies the more they stuff their pockets
"Hammertime" nah bro I'm dead 💀💀💀
Well said
who tf is hammertime ?
@@m33a the crusader DW
Everything about his collaboration with apuss is just bizarre and absolutely pathetic. Just to put things into perspective, imagine one of our du’aat started partaking in similar collaborations with some ex-Christian atheist. It wouldn’t take long before we question what kind of Dawah they are doing and shunning them all together. Everything about this looks absolutely desperate and weak. I’m sure he realizes it as well. It’s just about views and money at this point, not loyalty to any tradition.
Apuss is now atheist? I was thinking that he was an ex Muslim became christian
@@youtuber9668 lol exactly, one would think that.
I could understand if it were a scholar. But apuss? You might as well have Sheik Squidward come on your show
The fact that he collaborates with Apus shows how desperate he is.
@@AbuHaroonSyed man for real David wood is very lost man. His audience are like sheeps.
If a Muslim speaker work with an atheist, no Muslim will listen to them
❤
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Didn't expect to see you here.
W live, exposing that guy with sociopathic disorder
I don't think Wood being an admitted sociopath really makes what he says completely invalid, though he definitely gets things wrong and seems obsessed with talking about Islam despite being a supposed Christian who should be talking more about his own gospel.
@@justinarzola4584he’s seems a lot more interested in the Quran than his own scripture 🤔
@@justinarzola4584 it's invalid
@@justinarzola4584 you can't trust a psychopath lol
@@justinarzola4584 what's your point are you coping
11:54 Yasir Qadhi is a facilitator for people like DW. Yasir is already absorbed and endorsed the falsehoods of the orientalists at Yale university, and now he is propagating it subtly through his lessons.
He is a part of Yaqeen institute. The institute that supports homosexuality and is currently trying to establish free mixing in mosques.
Christians should find a better 'scholar' who supports their claims.
@@ezazahmed8379 I knew, DH have done a great job to expose them.
@M E You misunderstand. I was just annoyed that many people use YQ's statements to further their own claims
YQ should be shunned
That is why Western universities create such fake scholars like YQ, then elevate their stature over traditional scholars, so they can use them to propagate their falsehoods. Don't ever trust anyone studying Islam in a Western university.
You’re a legend farid, Allahouma baarik ❤️
Quotes are David's claim paraphrased
3:44 - "Da'wah is what Jihadis do when they're too weak to fight"
5:11 - "There's more than one version of the Qur'an"
8:21 - "Muslim du'aat lie to laymen about there being different versions of the Qur'an"
14:10 - Did YQ contradict himself in the two clips David played?
29:00 - We don't let go of lies whether it's from Muslims or non-Muslims
30:27 - Shabbir Ally's clip on Qur'an preservation
34:34 - "Sana' manuscript refutes that Qur'an has been preserved"
41:13 - *Ijaaz joins*
43:12 - The literature on Sana' manuscript speculates that the manuscript might be commentary, not a mushaf
45:40 - David needs to stop being
47:40 - "Average Muslims blindly parrot 'scholars'"
51:56 - "Your scholars are liars"
52:53 - "I wouldn't trust a lying Christian scholar" - David Wood 2023 (student of CP)
55:33 - "Parts of the Qur'an were lost"
59:11 - "Companions couldn't agree on what should be included in the Qur'an"
1:00:29 - "Ubayy ibn Ka'b believed there should be 116 chapters in the Qur'an"
1:01:43 - "Uthman burnt mushaf to cover the differences"
1:02:24 - "Average Muslim follows lying scholars"
1:03:50 - "Muslims want to bring converts by lying"
1:04:29 - "Converts like Sneako are being lied to"
1:07:31 - Q&A
What about the Prophet of Islam making lapses while delivering Allah's "devine" revelation?
Notice how a random reciter reminded Muhammad of Allah's message 👇
Sahih Muslim 788a
'A'isha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) heard a person reciting the Qur'an at night. Upon this he said: May Allah show mercy to him; he has reminded me of such and such a verse which I had missed in such and such a surah.
@@delmanorshun2471 divine*
@@delmanorshun2471let's talk about preservation of bible 😁
@@mohammedyasin2087 thanks for correcting the typo
@@delmanorshun2471 so the Prophet pbuh was a human, what's your point?
I love you for the sake of Allah my brother Farid. May almighty Allah swt grant y you a long and healthy life so that you can continue to fight 🔨 boy. ❤️ 🇿🇦
glad you had an extra time to waste for this David Wood... and it's worth it. I love the way you responds .. may Allah preserve you..
Brother Farid you truly live up to your name. You have the most complete and compelling arguments. May Allah bless you and your family for all your efforts
Muslims rule India for over 500 years, yet the Hindus were in majority and still are, so goes his argument down the drain. There were no armies sent to Indonesia and Malaysia, yet Muslims are in the majority in these countries.
Correction it was 1000 years as the Muslim rule in India started with Muslims conquering Pakistan and then Mahmoud of ghaznavi And Muhammad of ghor conquering northern India and Bangladesh but if you include Muslim rule of India to be from the time of Muhammad of ghor then it’s 800 years of Muslim rule in India . And not just India the ottoman Muslims ruled the Balkan
Christian states for 500 years. And yet most of the balkan countries identify as Christians. So Muslim rule in the balkans and India is enough to refute that Liberalcucktian.
David can not make arguments at all. He only makes pitty roasts on Islam
He makes angsty teenager Yahoo Messenger chat room insults from the early-2000s post 9/11 era.
@@Ex-Atheist_Sonya oddly specific Sonia lol
@@seasesh4073 David’s content seems like it’s stuck in the post 9/11 era anti-Islam hysteria so her description is pretty much on-point.
@@Ex-Atheist_Sonya fr, the stupid stuff he says could probably be found in some racist 4chan chats lol
@@Ex-Atheist_Sonya LOL u perfectly described his insults.
Yea David seems extra mad today hide the hammers 😂😂😂
Your scholars was just caught lying and u still defending him 🤡
@@loyaltyoverlove9374 what scholars yasir & Shabir are not scholars they’re preachers you goof maybe watch the video again for your feeble brain. Farid refutes David wood directly and condemns the mistake the preachers have made. Unlike your book with zero known authors and zero first century manuscripts 😂😂😂😂 300 years later after Jesus voting on whaat god is but keep listening to the man who tried to kill his father with a hammer
David Wood is actually one of the best Islamic dawa person that Christian world ever had 😅
I guess no Christian converted to Islam because of DW. But the opposite is certainly true.
That 1 dislike from David Wood 🤣🤣🤣
Thanks for uploading this!! Appreciate it
Keep up the good work brother Farid. May Allah reward you beyond measure.
No perfect preservation.
For arguments sake lets say the Quran isn't preserved than we are back to square one where both religions holy books aren't preserved so what do we do now? do we all become Atheists??????
Sheikh Uthman of San Diego did mention that DW was suffering from glutton for punishment syndrome.
@100_1OO____zzzzzzz
I left Christianity.
Did David really come out of retirement just to talk bout sneako becoming Muslim? 😂
Bigots never change.
Wasn't he banned for a while?
First video (white background) he was talking about kufic quran and that all of them are the same and identical @FaridResponds
The whole Levant, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine and Jordan, was still 50% Christian during the 1200s, it only became majority Muslim after the Mamluk wars vs the crusaders and Mongols
So that’s by the 1300s, 600 years it took for Muslims to become majority
Shows you there was always Islamic religious tolerance.
Don't lie to yourself.
The levant was always Muslim majority.
It's the Christians who took Greece Italy Spain which were majority Muslim.
Mental gymnastics.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي الكريم فريد مع كل الاحترام والتقدير لكم ولعلمكم
الاختلاف بين القراءات نوعين لا ثالث لهما الاول ان تختلف القراءتان في اللفظ وتتفقا في المعنى مثل اهدنا الصراط واهدنا السراط ومثل مالك وملك والنوع الثاني ان تختلف القراءتان في اللفظ والمعنى معا مع صحة المعنيين كليهما فلا يكونان متناقضين ولا متعارضين مثل قول الله وانظر الى العظام كيف ننشزهاثم نكسوها لحما قرئ ننشزها بالزاء ومعناها تضم بعضا الى بعض حتى تلتئم وتجتمع وقرئ بالراء معناها نحييها بعد الموت للحساب والمعنيان مختلفان ولكنهما لا يتناقضان ولا يتنافيان بل يلتقيان لان الله اذا اراد بعث الخلائق ضم عظامهم بعضها الى بعض حتى تجتمع ثم يحييها للجزاء
اما اختلاف القرائتين في اللفظ والمعنى مع تضاد المعنيين وتضارب الهدفين فلا اثر له في القران الكريم
بالنسبة لأجاز فهو لا يملك العلم الكافي في الاسلام وله اخطاء كثيره جدا خصوصي عندما تحدث في السابق بشكل جاهل جدا عن الاحرف السبعة والقراءات العشرة. للاسف هو متخصص في كتاب النصارى ومتعمق جدا في النصرانية حاله كحال معظم الدعاة في بريطانيا في ركن المحاورين بلندن لا يملكون العلم الكافي للرد على الشبهات الا بعلم الفلسفة علم الكلام ويقدموا العقل على النقل لانهم لا يملكوا العلم الكافي في النقل القران والسنة النبوية .
بارك الله فيكم ونفع الله بكم وبعلمكم
هو اختلاف تنوع و ليس اختلاف تضاد, فالامام السيوطي اورد في كتابه الاتقان الشروط اللازمة لحدوث التناقض و هي مستمدة من علم المنطق, و هم تقريباً نفس الاوجهه التي يستخدمها علماء الاصول و تسمي النسب الحكمية, فالقران لم يتناقض في اصول العقيدة فالله واحد و محمد رسوله عليه الصلاة و السلام, و لم يتناقض في القصص كونها اخبار, و الخلاف الفقهي هو خلاف ظني يكون بمرجح من القران او السنة, و الايات المتشابهات معظمها ايات في صفات الله عز وجل و من المنطقي ان تكون موجودة لان الله ليس كمثله شئ و عقول الناس متفاوتة في الادراك فتشتبه عليهم
I think its charitable to see that Sh YQ was saying that there has not been any changes from mushaf tradition from the time of the compilation & distribution and was simplifying the preservation. I dont think he was even trying to address the Qiraat issue and not trying to lie about it at all..
Ohhh David. Ignorance is a bliss they say 😂. Well done brother Faris ❤️👌
Your scholars was just caught lying and u still defending him 🤡
can you be specific which part of the quran matter/subject being lied about from islamic scholars?
but no one can denied there are multiple bible version, contradicting each other, even contradicting within one version of Bible, majority scholar today and from the past hold position Bible has been redacting/revised from different anonymous authors. That ( Bible) cannot possibly words from God.
ive always known about qiraat(different reading of quran) since i was a boy, that was around 90s. What lie lol?
للهم بارك وحفظ وتقبل من فريد أعماله ورزقه الأخلاص.. للهم أمين
DW's reference point is YQ. How convenient that is
To be perfectly honest this point is really shallow when picked with a fine comb because I can that with anyone I don’t like.
“Look this guy was quoted by David Wood.”
ikr, its like using a mormon to "disprove" trinity.
We should call him David Would, as in David would almost kill his father with a hammer
How did DW's video go from a refutation of Sneako to one of Yasir Qadhi?
He just needs to stop being...😂 killed me.
So Farid you don't believe all Qurans in the world today are exactly the same, word for word? If so, who told Sneako that? I believe that's how you guys have defined the Quran as perfectly preserved
The words are the same, but the tipe of reading is different (there are 7)
@@youtuber9668 Farid debunked what you just said. Watch the video again
@@youtuber9668 Can you be clear? Are you saying there are two different Qurans that have different WORDS in them today? Or are you remaining resolute in the classic claim that no two qurans in the world have different words or dots in them in the world today?
@@steelisrael3461 What Farid is saying and what all our scholars for the past over thousand years have been saying is that the Quran was revealed in seven ahruf directly from the prophet pbuh. So all the variations of the words are all direct revelation from God since we got them from the prophet pbuh. No one scholar has ever said there is no word variation in the Quran but all affirm that the variations themselves are Quran and you can use any of the variation since they are all Quran. We have always done this and we still do this to this day, many people know all the recitations by heart. We have chains of memorizations for all recitations with their word variations and all the chains lead back to the prophet pbuh himself.
Ibn ‘Abbaas who narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Jibreel taught me one style and I reviewed it until he taught me more, and I kept asking him for more and he gave me more until finally there were seven styles.”
(narrated by al-Bukhaari, 3047; Muslim, 819) The two most authentic books of Hadith
‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab who said: “I heard Hishaam ibn Hakeem reciting Soorat al-Furqaan in a manner different from that in which I used to recite it and the way in which the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) taught me to recite it. I was about to argue with him whilst he was praying, but I waited until he finished his prayer, and then I tied his garment around his neck and seized him by it and brought him to the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and said, ‘O Messenger of Allaah, I heard this man reciting Soorat-al-Furqaan in a way different to the way you taught it to me.’ The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to him, ‘Recite it,’ and he recited it as I had heard him recite it. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, ‘It was revealed like this.’ Then he said to me, ‘Recite it,’ so I recited it and he said, ‘It was revealed like this.’ This Qur'aan has been revealed in seven different ways, so recite it in the way that is easiest for you.’”
(Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 2287; Muslim, 818)
Probably some ignoramus who isn't aware that Ahruf and Qiraat are a thing.
Jazaakallaahu khayran
If Quran has ever been changed, even with a word… than it would automatically show up a contradiction in it. Just a statement like this is enough to destroy these pagan.
According to the history of quran, there is no change. Its in the language of Quraish as it was revealed to prophet pbuh. Like the national anthem, every level singging the same lyric/melody till present day.
This character still can’t see the ‘wood’ for the trees
There is a famous quote by a rabbi said that "Christianity is like pig, appears to be kosher but it is not" That is why according to orthodox Jewish it is prohibited to be inside a church or pass by it, because Christians worship multiple gods not one. However, Jews can pray in a Muslim mosque as long as their niche is towards Jerusalem, because Muslims believe in absolute monotheism.
Farid and David seem to have something in common. They both seem to be attracted to the colour purple.
Loving these longer live streams bro, please keep em coming ❤💪
David the cross dresser talking about lying 😂😂😂
Your scholars was just caught lying and u still defending him 🤡
Can someone explain 2 things to me. If nothing can immitate quran, how did those erroneous Quran's get to be? Second, in this video in minute 20:00 it says Yasser says Uthman said destroy the Qurans that were 8 or 9 generations old. There was no 8 generations of Muslims during Uthman's time?
He just made a mistake with his tongue by speaking fast, also ur first question, unno what ur asking exactly but if it's to do with copiest errors then that's the answer. Every Tom, John and Harry started writing and copying the Quran without no editors to makes sure there isn't mistakes, so Uthman being the Scholar he is ordered for the standardization of the Quran and thank God he did. Remember, Uthman is the husband of the Prophet's daughters, he isn't just anybody. That standard copy then go distributed everywhere and was made sure the copies were properly being done.
@@runimcomingforyou.4505 Farid made mistake? What was he supposed to say?
@@tonydimera282 I'm talking about the question you had about Yasir.
@@runimcomingforyou.4505 My question is, actually 2 of them, Farid said that Uthmam said to bring all bad Qurans to burn from 8-9 generations but Uthman was the first generation himself, there were no generations before him in Islam. And 2, If no one can create a sura like Quran, how did people with the wrong Qurans believe in it?
@@tonydimera282 I just answered the Yasir, he does this often where he talks fast and makes mistakes in his speech, we all do that. Of course there were no 9 generations of Muslim by then.
Who is creating a Surah like Quran? Where on earth did you get that idea from?
dont worry Muhammad hijab will protect sneako from that 🤡
I always thought that the notion that it was 100% dot for dot was true but didn't really think anything of it. Inshallah I'll watch that Playlist you mentioned. Informative video, worth it to subscribe.
Most laymen Muslims aren't aware that the Quran comes in different ahruf and to be fair they also don't need to, knowing one qira'a is sufficient for anyone memorizing the Quran.
The Muslims in this comment section are so delusional, even faced with clear proof that someone is contradicting themselves, they choose to ignore it and make excuses 🤦♂️
im not a muslim nor do i support islam, but i feel bad for farid on this one and it makes me wish his audience was smarter around @13:30
The zombies of Yasir Qadhi 🧌
جزاكم الله خيرًا
Amazing bro we need more time with you
Alhamdulillah akhi ❤
I'm surprised no one is commenting on this, but I found it incredibly shameful that many Muslims were not able to pick up the contradiction on the first watch. Even without context the error was clear, and the context just made it worse since it contained other mistakes and oversimplifications. I encourage all of you to read more about the preservation of the Quran. Yaqeen wrote several excellent articles on this topic, but if we're going to engage with Christians, we should avoid looking like fools by turning a blind eye to an extremely obvious contradiction.
Yaqeen?? Better you stay away from yaqeen.
Lgbtq supporters at Yaqeen will mislead you.
Stay away from that Yas Queen Institute.
Better stay away from Yeqeen
Better stay away from Yakeen
For me its like we got the context of the white BG video and then still ignoringed it. For me he was explaining that Qurans before Uthman compiled it hat copy errors and such, and after he made a standardized version, there was none, because everybody copied from this version.
You will find difference between warsh and hafs and that isn’t a problem since it was there since day one and it was accepted
You will never see a warsh Quran having difference with another warsh Quran or hafs Quran having difference with another hafs Quran that what was meant by unchanged 😊❤
It’s like saying all King James Bible is the same
Ofc Sherlock
Yup. That's right. But what the christians do was comparing warsh against hafs or against dhuri. Of course the letter differs according to their dialect but the message intact.
Psychopath is now a meme.Let him bark.
13:20 if the suckling and stoning verses were revelations from Allah why didn’t they make it in the Quran? That proves you don’t have all the verses from the “eternal” Quran
With my knowledge about qira’at (with your help and my own research) I understand what Yasir Qadhi is saying in the white background video. He’s comparing the preservation of the Quran for a specific qira’a compared to the bible. He’s not mentioning other qira’at because in his mind it will confuse his audience and may cause a fitna. I wholeheartedly disagree with this approach to shield an audience from this but I would not call him a liar in this instance.
YQ is a modernist reformer who is now accepted by shi'a. He said himself that he wants to bring orthodox muslims to his reformist, lgbt-accepting movement. He even declared himself mufti for north america.
@@Kinderlieder-Kindergeschichte yale really messed up his head
@@zakariaabdullah7270 you didn't do your research. YQ is a wolf is sheeps clothing, preying on ignorants like you.
@@Kinderlieder-Kindergeschichte Though I hate him, give sources for your claims.
@@xenomorphisisdilage472 also check out what Dr. Zakir Naik and Farid say about YQ statments regarding Qur'an preservation, he's clearly a mole now, changed from orthodox to shi'a loving abrahamic faith guy, also he admitted studying Islamic politics (or something similar) under Tony Blair, about whom he said, some of his speech is sorcery (sihr).
brother u said no scholar disagrees but in a clip u said Tabari rejects some recitations
His ignorance is blissful
JAZAK ALLAH BROTHER FARID. AND I HAVE A REQUEST PLEASE DONT DISAPPEAR AND DONT STOP UPLOADING VIDEOS.
Why don't david wood takes a challenge. - produce a verse..
What a vague challenge with no substance. It doesn't even have a criteria
@@raditz4583are you scared??
@@joejr.cocker9997 of what ? Lol
Surely those who persist in disbelief, it is the same whether you warn them or not-they will never believe. Quran 2:6
David need to have some figs and chill out. In Sha Allah 😅😅😅.
I think that yaasir was talking about the skeletal text in the video with the white background. And in the other one he spoke about the different mushaf.
نحن المسلمون تلقينا القرآن الكريم بالنقل الشفهي والتواتر وليس بالنسخ. نحن على دراية بمخطوطات صنعاء. الأشخاص الذين كتبوا مخطوطات صنعاء ليسوا كاملين وارتكبوا أخطاء في النسخ أدت إلى الانحراف عن الأصل وهذا الانحراف لا يغير من الأصل بشئ الذي يحفظه المسلمون عن ظهر قلب. انت تريد أن تفرض على المسلمين أن أخطاء النسخ هي تحريف في الأصل ولم يتم حفظ القرآن.
جاء النقل الشفوي للقرآن الكريم قبل كتابة ونسخ القرآن الكريم.بفترة طويلة. إنك تحاول أن تقول إن كتابة ونسخ القرآن الكريم الذي جاء بعد وقت طويل من النقل الشفوي للقرآن دليل على عدم حفظ القرآن. إنك تحاول جاهدًا الحكم على النقل الشفوي للقرآن الكريم وفقًا لكتابة ونسخ القرآن الكريم. عليك أن تحكم على كتابة النسخ للقرآن الكريم وفقًا للنقل الشفوي للقران لأن النقل الشفوي جاء أولا وهو الأصل وليس العكس. أنت تحاول الحكم على الأصل وفقًا لكتابة ونسخ القران وهذا خطأ. نحن نعتمد على النقل الشفهي القادم من النبي محمد ص إلى أصحابه حتى اليوم وليس على المخطوطات مثل المسيحيين
النقل الشفهي هو الاساس لانه حتي مع وجود مخطوطات عثمان رضي الله عنه للقران و هي المصاحف فهي كانت مكتوبة بخطوط غير منقوطة و كان يلزم لقرائتها ان يكون حافظ القران يعلمه شفاهية اولاً لانه بغير ذلك لن يستطيع قرائته, اي ان النقل الشفهي كان هو الاساس, ثانياً المسلمون لا ياخذون باي مخطوطة ما لم يكون لها اسناد وهذا يطبق في كتب الائمة و الفقهاء وغيرهم في توضيح اسناد الكتاب, فما بالك بمخطوطات مجهولة للقران, و من المعروف بان بعض الصحابة كانوا يعلقون في هوامش المصحف بكلمات تفسيرية و غيرها و كانوا يأمنون من حدوث الخطأ لان الكل كان علي دراية بالقراءات الصحيحة, المستشرقون الغربييون يريدون اسقاط الطرق و المنهجية التي استخدمها علماء الاسلام خاصة علوم الحديث والاحتكام الي اساليبهم و طرقهم التي معظمها مزيفة ثم يستخدمونها في اعادة بناء القران و تفسيره وفق منطقهم و هذا اشبه بطرق الفرق الباطنية و تفاسيرهم
Jazakamullah khair
It bothers me when even knowledgeable Muslims don't make the difference between mus'haf and Quran
Farid responds coming to the rescue
sneakos reaction to this was enough, didn't need this
The first video of Y. Q. is about changes over periods of time, the second is about qiraat
NEXT STREAM - Let Jooj refute AP and DW 😂
He avoids the most important thing which is showing us how the meaning conflicts or contradicts another.
Sigh, Farid. You just gave the missionaries a golden clip by using the word lie as you will allow them to use that as a seal of approval in their next lying video.
JazakAllahu khairan @ fareed
It's so amusing how these Paulytheists project the accusation of lying, knowing their whole religion is built on lies, promulgated by a self appointed "Apostle" who admitted lying, and justified his lies. These people are munafiqeen of the highest level.
I am not an expert in this by any means. I think the most charitable way to address this controversy is to think of a teacher talking with students. If they are in middle school he describes electrons in a simplistic way. It is OK for them to imagine electrons as small balls orbiting around a large ball. Physics students in university study the nature of electrons in a more detailed way.
As Ex muslim, Jesus is God ✝
So how come he got killed on the cross by his own creation? What kind of a God is that
@@mtsheikh1147 The sacrifice of our Lord Jesus is for the fulfillment of Jehovah's prophecies in the Old Testament that Jehovah will be speared Zechariah 12:10 and Psalms 22:16, 17 and will be summoned to court Isaiah 53 and will be born through a virgin who is God. He is mighty, Isaiah 9:6 and...
I love my Lord because he loves us like his son, not like a slave and master Quran 19:88, 93!
Seek Jesus and find the truth
@@Knightoflord yh I seeked him and I found him saying, it is not my will but the fathers will and saying not to worship him as he is just a messenger
@@mtsheikh1147 Well, congratulations,
Satan has led you astray and you have found a false Jesus! Even if your fathers are close friends of Muhammad, it doesn't matter because Muhammad spreads the false Jesus and he's antichrist ! I pray that you will find the real Jesus to reach eternal life. Believe me, kissing and touching the black stone will not send you to heaven. If Muhammad did that, then you should doubt Muhammad, why! Where even in the Quran did Abraham go to Mecca? Even if Abraham built the black stone, why didn't all the prophets pay attention to the black stone and they go to Jerusalem?! Ask yourself these questions! I hope you seek and find the Real Jesus (the jesus who is a prophet or Muslim is a false jesus) and discover eternal life and heaven because Jesus is the Only Way and no one else! And I pray for you 🙏:)
Not possible for him to be god he prayed to the father, why would god pray to god?
Commenting for algorithims. Jazaak Allah Khair. Please link the playlists you mentioned at ~7:00 in the description.
Wood, ignorance never stopped you from speaking about Islam.
a very good video about this topic at last unlike those who lie about it
lol bunch of muslims pulling the good old "we don't know the context" and then if you know the context and you don't agree with what your muslim brother is speakng then you call him a kafir. dawah is literally a joke at this point.
Your mistake is mixing up different comments from different people not involved in dawah as if they are from the same person. You are the joke.
@@ZiIIousLol from your response, you sound lost for words and confused!
Anyway, read how Muhammad himself made lapses while delivering Allah's devine revelation!
Notice a random reciter reminding Allah's Messenger of his devine message 👇
Sahih Muslim 788a
'A'isha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) heard a person reciting the Qur'an at night. Upon this he said: May Allah show mercy to him; he has reminded me of such and such a verse which I had missed in such and such a surah.
@@delmanorshun2471 You are the confused.
Quran(87:6): "We will have you recite ˹the Quran, O Prophet,˺ so you will not forget ˹any of it˺,"
After this verse was revealed, he has never forgotten a verse.
Anything you bring up has already been answered online, so go do your research.
@@ZiIIous Nope! Don't concoct your own excuse here!
Are you saying Allah himself forgot to LET Muhammad avoid mistakes right from the beginning?
Along the road, did Muhammad complained to Allah about his forgetful problems that made Allah to reveal the Quranic verse you posted?
You blatantly LIED by claiming this issue have been dealt with by scholars Can you give any link or reference on any Islamic scholar that support your claim?
@@ZiIIous Abdul You posted that Quranic verse without the ending context.... Here is it in full 👇
Quran (87:6)
We shall make you recite and then you will not forget, (87:7) except what Allah should wish.
Do you have any arguments 😂🤣😂
Hey Guys We Need A Video That clarifying all the 7 mushaf With evidence.🙂
Good luck with that!
What do you mean "the 7 mushaf"?
Why are you wasting time asking viewers to comment etc. Just get to the point. SMH
He didn't upload this video for us but to specifically target Sneako since he is newly reverted. Little he know how dumb he sounds whenever he speaks about Islam.
Christians talking about scripture corruption is instant comedy.
@@user-xd9sq4sz3f Stating facts and dubbing it "comedy" shows how delusional you are, we have so many proof of contradictions and no proof of proper documentation of the Bible that we're sick of them, go ahead and show us 1 proof that the Quran has a contradiction, and let the comedy ensue as the Christian talks about scripture authenticity and corruption.
Just to be sure Farid do you mean the differences in the Magrihb region are because they trace back to one of the Qirat from the prophet pbuh? I thought all the others other than the Qurayshi Qirat died out when the mushaf was standardized? Also about the different words is that true? and do they change the meaning? This is a genuine question if you could help me out with the brother.
Check out my videos in my defense of Quran playlist.
@@FaridResponds okay will do now again one after another. I've watched them slowly as they came out I mighta missed it. But, if not I might ask again this was not clarified very well in the stream. Anyway thank you akhi
also just wanted to make note of this. I didn't get a notification at all that you replied when i normally would have from other. I just happened to come back to the video and see the reply. Is this a form of censoring by youtube?
I can not listen to hammertime wood, just so repulsive. It feels like an insect making sticky squishy sounds and also looking very disgusting. May Allah help you brother Farid for enduring this for the sake of Allah and refuting the lies they spew out.
Lol! What lies is Farid refuting?
Read Muhammad making lapses while delivering Allah's "devine" revelation...... Notice a random reciter reminding Muhammad of his lapses 👇
Sahih Muslim 788a
'A'isha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) heard a person reciting the Qur'an at night. Upon this he said: May Allah show mercy to him; he has reminded me of such and such a verse which I had missed in such and such a surah.
The white background video is talking about “Rasm-ul-khat” and the second video is talking about “Qira’at” wallahu-A’lam
There is an easy explanation…. The Holy prophet (pbh) taught the Quran to the sahaba and whatever flowed from the Prophet to his companion was preserved…. all different accepted readings that are available today all come from the Holy prophet (pbh)….. for example, for the sake of argument, refer to the Hadith of 7 ahruf, if caliph omar(ra) had written his reading and likewise Hisham (ra) had written his reading then we would have two reading, different but yet verified by the prophet (pbh) himself. There is no contradiction here. Hence, we should look at the different readings from this point of view.
In a weird way, Yasir Qadhi is himself proof of the veracity of the Prophet Muhammad. Take any old clip of Yasir and you will find a new clip where he is inconsistent in his opinions. He definitely changed along the way and so much so that he seems to stand at a 180 degree turn on some matters. I'm not faulting him, but that is how people and their personalities develop. We forget our old opinions and may state something today totally different than in the past. Which is why the Prophet Muhammad PBUH, and the Qur'an are so remarkable. Even if we were to accept small changes here and there, whatever change that is claimed is very minor and does not contradict the core teachings or beliefs of Islam. The message stays consistent. It is this consistency that is truly remarkable. Had the Prophet Muhammad written the Qur'an in the manner that has been universally accepted in a piecemeal fashion, and in an order far different from the end form or any standard form or order (narrative, chronological, procedural etc), then the Qur'an would have been a garbled mess with no structure, no sense, no cohesion, no eloquence, and no consistency. Yet the Qur'an is far from those things, despite having a unique structure that any writer would find counterintuitive if one were attempting to be effectively consistent, cohesive, eloquent and comprehensible. It's hard enough writing a book over 23 years and being consistent while going along a linear progression. Now try writing a book over 23 years where the first 5 verses get added to the next 14, written years later and together they form the 96th chapter, such as Surat Al-Alaq. In that chapter, we are taught a number of facts, none of which contradict anything else in the Qur'an. 1)God created humans from Alaq 2)God teaches humans by the pen 3) Despite this gift, humans transgress 4) We will all return to God 5) The one who forbids a servant when he prays, God will drag him from his lying, sinning forelock 6) He will have no one to call upon.7) Do not obey him but bow to Allah.
As stated, none of these pronouncements are contradicted in the Qur'an, and the rhythm of the verses is not broken despite the time gap between the two parts. Rather than finding contradictions, we find facts that are corroborated by knowledge and future events. The forelock, for example, is the frontal lobe and this is the place of lying in the brain. Abu Jahl, the "one who prevents a servant from praying" dies a polytheist and therefore was failed by those who he called upon besides Allah. Allah commands that the believers do not obey him, because of his eventual end in hell, which makes this a prophecy.
David is ignorant of the Quran. The Quran is a recitation and the writings can have variations in the spellings until it was put together in one holy book in line with the recitation given to the prophet pbuh, that is normal.
Lol! Muhammad himself made mistakes while reading the Quran! Read 👇
Sahih Muslim 788a
'A'isha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) heard a person reciting the Qur'an at night. Upon this he said: May Allah show mercy to him; he has reminded me of such and such a verse which I had missed in such and such a surah.
Notice Muhammad being reminded by a random reciter 👆
Reacting to reaction, to reactions 😂
People in contact with sneako should tell him to stop debating until he has knowledge, no disrespect but he still doesn’t know the basic ahkam he can’t be debating theology
Are we just gonna ignore the fact that the David Wood video has obvious clip editing? He's cut the video of Yasir Qadhi to make it sound like he said the Quran has changes In letters and words. Just watch his hand movements when he says this part.
Just finished watching this stream. Farid played both Yasir Qadhi with the full context. Turns out David was correct and Sneako incredibly uninformed. There is more than one version of the Quran objectively and factually.
I love how many Muslim brothers reacting to that video to support sneako.
Exactly we will not let sneako down the Christian asked a stupid question which I can also refute