I don’t but honestly given the speeds I got from the EAP783 were nowhere near even the advertised speeds for the EAP773 they are probably the same. Hopefully drivers and tweaks for windows 11 will increase what MLO connections can do for WiFi 7. Hopefully iPhone 16 or 17 has MLO so I can test that this fall.
@@longtieuphuc2883 I pay for 2gig fiber up and down. I don’t know if Fidium/consolidated communications has their own speed test. But that speedtest server for consolidated in the speed test app is hosted on their server.
@@j0shuaj Ceiling mount makes sense if you have access to run the cable or have a pro do it. In my case I have an Ethernet wall jack behind the access point and switch shown so just placing it right there made sense for my small House.
Dude Thank you for the video. I have no clue how you figured this out since i have found ZERO documentation on setting up LAG. I have all the same hardware and I got loop back issues because i did not know about enabling the truck. Yea ti would be nice if there was a conformation that we actually are getting 20GIG connection to the switch. I will never use that much bandwidth so i might see if i can just connect the second Ethernet to a different switch for redundancy... Neverless thank you. I
you should run an openspeed test or iperf server locally. also you forgot to do a speediest to the old 690e with the wifi7 card. 10 bucks it performs the same via the "online" version of speed test
This is awesome. I believe if you used Active LACP instead of Static LAG you might have seen the 20Gbps (with the knowledge that you would still only ever get 10gb per link) that should let you have two full speed streams to the rest of the network.
Thank you! It fails to connect and starts rebooting ports all over the network with that setting set. The EAP side can’t handle those settings. I confirmed with TP-Link support that I set it up correctly given the EAPs limitations.
@TimothyRoy I had a quick look at tplink community forums and seems LACP is either not working or not supported... apparently there is no mention of which standard it acctualy is capable of. plus the fact that they call bonding "trunk" tells me this might be a half-baked product/firmware. I have a 690e which i switched from a unifi 6 enterprise, and I am much happier but TP-LINK aps seem to have very little to no firmware updates past the 6 to 12 month post initial release. I am sort of planning to purchase a 783 but might wait to see if this gets resolved... and to be honest, I have 0 wifi 7 devices and usually 1st gen devices and drivers usualy suck when a new standard comes out. but please, if you have time, try doing local speed tests from a server capable of 10gbps and try that wifi7 card again...( iperf3 or openspeedtest from a docker instance using host network, no natting) thanks
@@bober1019 check my channel. I have a video where I do that with win11 24h2 canary build installed. Definitely faster even from a room away through drywall. Rivals my 2.5GB Ethernet connection.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี : คู่มวยแห่งยุค (11 ตุลาคม 2567)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aTc7-tPYuJM/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for taking the time to make this video. Was very helpful.
I am glad you enjoyed it! Thank you for watching it.
Thanks man. DATA, this is a REAL review, abrazo!
Thanks for watching!
Thanks for taking the time to make this comparison! Any idea how the EAP 773 compares with the 783 in terms of performance?
I don’t but honestly given the speeds I got from the EAP783 were nowhere near even the advertised speeds for the EAP773 they are probably the same. Hopefully drivers and tweaks for windows 11 will increase what MLO connections can do for WiFi 7. Hopefully iPhone 16 or 17 has MLO so I can test that this fall.
what is your internet speed accoriding to your ISP not the one from the Speedtest?
@@longtieuphuc2883 I pay for 2gig fiber up and down. I don’t know if Fidium/consolidated communications has their own speed test. But that speedtest server for consolidated in the speed test app is hosted on their server.
Just bought into Omada with my house running 670s, is ceiling mounting ideal or is having then on a table as you have them fine?
@@j0shuaj Ceiling mount makes sense if you have access to run the cable or have a pro do it. In my case I have an Ethernet wall jack behind the access point and switch shown so just placing it right there made sense for my small
House.
Dude Thank you for the video. I have no clue how you figured this out since i have found ZERO documentation on setting up LAG. I have all the same hardware and I got loop back issues because i did not know about enabling the truck. Yea ti would be nice if there was a conformation that we actually are getting 20GIG connection to the switch. I will never use that much bandwidth so i might see if i can just connect the second Ethernet to a different switch for redundancy... Neverless thank you. I
@@bradmesserle999 You’re welcome. I’m happy new people have found the video recently and found it helpful!
Can the 2nd ethernet port be used to connect other LAN devices if the LAG is not utilised?
@@koustuvkanungo9873 I believe it can be used for down stream access points. Unsure if it can be used otherwise
Unifi is my go to but impressed on the tp link equipment just no 2FA and overheating issues from bad power management
keeps me away from omada
@@fleeseeks Omada has 2FA. Can’t speak to power management.
Amazing video! Thank you! Hopefully MLO can be tested soon.
@@thomazd in another video I posted on my channel I tested MLO with the Windows 11 24H2 beta.
@@TimothyRoy Great, just checked!
you should run an openspeed test or iperf server locally. also you forgot to do a speediest to the old 690e with the wifi7 card. 10 bucks it performs the same via the "online" version of speed test
Can the second 10g port be used as a POE pass-on or only as a LAG?
@@Someguy21341 pass through to other Access points yes, POE I am not sure. I think only the main port on it is POE.
Awesome. Tp-link router has bunch of ports but only one sfp+ support 10 gigs, others 1g, that sucks. As user u' have to buy switch and other stuff
The TP-Link ER8411 Router has 2 SFP+ 10 gig ports.
you are right, but one is mainly for the WAN, the other is for the LAN and the other ethernet ports are not used. i just not count wan port.
Thanks for the video, a lot of useful info
This is awesome. I believe if you used Active LACP instead of Static LAG you might have seen the 20Gbps (with the knowledge that you would still only ever get 10gb per link) that should let you have two full speed streams to the rest of the network.
Thank you! It fails to connect and starts rebooting ports all over the network with that setting set. The EAP side can’t handle those settings. I confirmed with TP-Link support that I set it up correctly given the EAPs limitations.
@@TimothyRoy when using LACP, one side needs to be passive, the other side active.
@@bober1019 in this case, that breaks the connection. I confirmed with support I have it set right. Manual confirms
@TimothyRoy I had a quick look at tplink community forums and seems LACP is either not working or not supported... apparently there is no mention of which standard it acctualy is capable of. plus the fact that they call bonding "trunk" tells me this might be a half-baked product/firmware. I have a 690e which i switched from a unifi 6 enterprise, and I am much happier but TP-LINK aps seem to have very little to no firmware updates past the 6 to 12 month post initial release. I am sort of planning to purchase a 783 but might wait to see if this gets resolved... and to be honest, I have 0 wifi 7 devices and usually 1st gen devices and drivers usualy suck when a new standard comes out.
but please, if you have time, try doing local speed tests from a server capable of 10gbps and try that wifi7 card again...( iperf3 or openspeedtest from a docker instance using host network, no natting)
thanks
@@bober1019 check my channel. I have a video where I do that with win11 24h2 canary build installed. Definitely faster even from a room away through drywall. Rivals my 2.5GB Ethernet connection.