Rudy Viner The "Use-it-or-lose-it" card draw that red has gotten in the past couple of years has really changed the ways that standard burn plays, while modern burn still plays more like the burn of old. Its really increased the kinds of decisions that burn players have and the interest for the viewers.
TempestDacine so becuase ur opinion differs u make a jab at someone for their profile pic? should i also make one at yours because u have an anime picture and i dont agree with you?
supertrace666 I would never play mono-red outside of the occasional cube draft, but I have to say the red mirrors have been more interesting that I would have expected them to have been. There used to just be flow chart-eqse decisions trees, a lot of I hope I only draw x lands, and I hope I get creatures early spells late. The "Use-it-or-lose-it" card draw has added some interesting elements and so have mechanics like Dash. If this approach continues my contempt for red may become simply indifference.
Its quite surprising the amount of (pseudo) card-draw Sam Black can get from his MONO-RED deck, thanks to the mix of Frontier Siege, the Abbot, and Chandra (the good one). Out of the multitude of Red Deck Wins, this one seems the most reliable as it still maintains gas in the later game.
Ariel Bruce Outpost Sige, but yeah. It seems to be their sideboard-tech against matches like the mirror, cause you can point all these burn-spells at creatures so it becomes an attrition fight. I think he plays no Sieges main, but Abbot i realy like too in a red deck with easy to cast spells, that has mostly the problem of running out of gas.
Cuneo's deck looks like fun. I've never rooted for the control player so hard.
These burn mirrors are way more interesting than modern burn mirrors
Rudy Viner The "Use-it-or-lose-it" card draw that red has gotten in the past couple of years has really changed the ways that standard burn plays, while modern burn still plays more like the burn of old. Its really increased the kinds of decisions that burn players have and the interest for the viewers.
Am I missing something? Why didn't Cuneo mulligan the first game?
Damien Greed.
That is seriously bad, a one lander, colorless land on the draw
Is it me or have sound levels been dropping lower and lower during this tournament?
Does the amount of mono red decks here disgust anyone else?
TempestDacine so becuase ur opinion differs u make a jab at someone for their profile pic? should i also make one at yours because u have an anime picture and i dont agree with you?
Sure.
supertrace666 slightly but too each their own
supertrace666 I would never play mono-red outside of the occasional cube draft, but I have to say the red mirrors have been more interesting that I would have expected them to have been. There used to just be flow chart-eqse decisions trees, a lot of I hope I only draw x lands, and I hope I get creatures early spells late. The "Use-it-or-lose-it" card draw has added some interesting elements and so have mechanics like Dash. If this approach continues my contempt for red may become simply indifference.
On the contrary, it excites me seeing all this Mono Red and thats coming for someone who loves playing black
Its quite surprising the amount of (pseudo) card-draw Sam Black can get from his MONO-RED deck, thanks to the mix of Frontier Siege, the Abbot, and Chandra (the good one). Out of the multitude of Red Deck Wins, this one seems the most reliable as it still maintains gas in the later game.
Ariel Bruce Outpost Sige, but yeah. It seems to be their sideboard-tech against matches like the mirror, cause you can point all these burn-spells at creatures so it becomes an attrition fight. I think he plays no Sieges main, but Abbot i realy like too in a red deck with easy to cast spells, that has mostly the problem of running out of gas.
why are the commentators mean to Micheal Flores and Shahar Shenhar??