ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Buckshot Ninth Pellet Flyer Phenomenon

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ส.ค. 2024
  • Paul tests the ninth pellet flyer phenomenon with buckshot.
    Shirts and patches from Tristar Trading Co:
    Other platforms:
    Rumble: rumble.com/c/P...
    Odysee: odysee.com/@pa...
    Paul's Patreon: www.patreon.co...
    This video was edited and uploaded by:
    Brad Nelson - minutemantheory.com

ความคิดเห็น • 1.1K

  • @michaeljames4904
    @michaeljames4904 4 ปีที่แล้ว +617

    These Paul Harrell action figures are getting really life like.

    • @ericericson192
      @ericericson192 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      but can they shoot?

    • @RustyorBroken
      @RustyorBroken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I'm pretty sure Paul wouldn't sell anything that accepted a Glock mag. Beretta 92FS on the other hand....

    • @ferdberffle
      @ferdberffle 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      But do they come with yabuts and caveats?

    • @RustyorBroken
      @RustyorBroken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I'm almost certain they would be on the back of the package.

    • @ferdberffle
      @ferdberffle 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RustyorBroken 🤣 yep

  • @butchbroussard8468
    @butchbroussard8468 4 ปีที่แล้ว +371

    I want a T-shirt that says "You be the judge".

    • @MycroftOnTheMove
      @MycroftOnTheMove 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I want a T-shirt that says "There's no replacement for shot placement "

    • @maxk5038
      @maxk5038 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      YES I WOULD BUY

    • @jamescooper2618
      @jamescooper2618 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I want a T-shirt that says "Do not read this under penalty of law."

    • @Stigstigster
      @Stigstigster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Just let me buy a Paul Harrell action figure. Send it topless and I'll make my own t-shirts for it.

    • @regularfather4708
      @regularfather4708 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I want "please bear with gunfire you hear in the background."

  • @BushcraftingBogan
    @BushcraftingBogan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +386

    My takeaway, avoid “Suprema Premium Buckshot”.

    • @gregoryadkins2213
      @gregoryadkins2213 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Fisty McBeefPunch The Mossberg had no trouble firing the cheap ammo with no problems.Yes crappy ammo,but obviously the Remington-870,is no comparison to the Mossberg-500

    • @dubdubberson
      @dubdubberson 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I picked up a ton of it from WalMart for $5/box for the 00 Buckshot, I'll make use of it.

    • @zorro456
      @zorro456 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sometimes you have to use what you can get.

    • @hereditarysedentary6812
      @hereditarysedentary6812 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It's made to spread out as much as possible it seems lol. Floor to ceiling coverage down a long enough hallway

    • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I liked it because it was cheap, allowed me to practice recoil management, ans for shooting targets I focused on the centre of the group.
      I would not, however, hunt with it trust my life to it. Trusting my life to it is also trusting it with the lives of everyone behind the threat.

  • @michaelblacktree
    @michaelblacktree 4 ปีที่แล้ว +432

    If I were LuckyGunner, I'd consider this as a compliment. 👍

    • @MrHowardPhillips
      @MrHowardPhillips 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      I'm betting the world is full of people who wish they felt as good as LuckyGunner right now.

    • @TWX1138
      @TWX1138 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @Robert Bemister Well, there's probably one person who doesn't feel this way, given a recent video...

    • @KikiRevenge
      @KikiRevenge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's a good channel.

    • @carlsasau6162
      @carlsasau6162 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      LuckyGunner is a very good channel. No surprise Paul watches it. They are both serious and crunch numbers and show stuff in a way, that I, for my part, just can't make out anything I would complain about.

    • @tatsuhirosatou5513
      @tatsuhirosatou5513 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nah I'm pretty sure lucky gunner doesn't come around here with how paul school him in his own comments when he shows how much of a fake expert he is, especially when he declares nothing matters but expansion and penetration and 357 and 9mm have the exact same effectiveness.

  • @lenscap8925
    @lenscap8925 4 ปีที่แล้ว +198

    The "malfunctions" were just pure stagefright on the part of the cartridge to be evaluated by HIM!

    • @SiFiFreak
      @SiFiFreak 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Which is worse
      Failure to perform
      Or
      Premature ...
      🤣🤣

    • @Stigstigster
      @Stigstigster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yep, they basically just shit themselves.

    • @danatcanyonlake583
      @danatcanyonlake583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Love Paul Harrell like a brother, but I'm not quite sure how you get a "malfunction" with a pump shotgun. I've "short-shucked" plenty of times and it's a malfunction - a brain malfunction!

    • @craigbenz4835
      @craigbenz4835 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I would have liked to have seen more analysis and comment on the malfunctions.

    • @bigsean2473
      @bigsean2473 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SiFiFreak Failure to perform

  • @bigbyrd7755
    @bigbyrd7755 4 ปีที่แล้ว +154

    If there was a rap album of just Paul naming ammo types I would bump that so hard.

    • @Overwar100
      @Overwar100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @Keith The Faith Whacchu say now Chuck?

    • @MrLeo7627
      @MrLeo7627 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Rap ? Thats funny. If I really heard that I would be so confused . Maybe the 'Eagles' that would be
      ok. Or that one , 8675-309 I got it.

    • @maxk5038
      @maxk5038 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      YES

    • @davidcolter
      @davidcolter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Look
      If you had
      One shot
      Of Remington green and white box
      Nine millimeter jacketed hollowpoint
      In the meat target
      Would you video it
      Or just let it slip?

    • @hermask815
      @hermask815 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      David Colter
      Didn’t see that coming
      ...now I have mom’s spaghetti on my white shirt...

  • @davidf2092
    @davidf2092 4 ปีที่แล้ว +172

    In April of 2012 (I still have the emails with Federal) I bought a case of Federal Power-Shok 12 ga 2 3/4 in Buckshot F127 00. In over half of the 40 shells I fired, 2 pellets stayed in the bottom of the wad surrounded by white buffer material and made it about 40-50 yards remaining lodged in the wad. I contacted Federal and they had me send them some of the shells and they ran tests and found the exact same thing. They had UPS pick up the rest of the ammo and sent me another case. Interesting to see this problem has not gone away.

    • @Stigstigster
      @Stigstigster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      How did the new case perform?

    • @jackd2083
      @jackd2083 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      If the wad hits the target with the 2 pellets in it is it an issue? I don’t see the problem but I don’t own a shotgun either.

    • @Mirokuofnite
      @Mirokuofnite 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@jackd2083 Depends on your point of view. But if you wanted your rounds to have maximum effectiveness (which you should), losing 2 pellets in a wad regularly is a big deal. It's a major quality control issue, which if unresolved might lead to lower quality ammo down the line due to complacency at the factory.

    • @davidf2092
      @davidf2092 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@jackd2083 It's not ideal. You want the wad to fall away from the shot charge fairly quickly. A wad is not in any way aerodynamic so it shortens the range and power behind the last two pellets. Plus it skews the trajectory pretty badly. At 40-50 yards the pellets trapped in the wad are not going to hit your target.

    • @davidf2092
      @davidf2092 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@Stigstigster It was better, but a few months later a friend of mine bought a case from Federal with a different lot number and had the same issue.

  • @maxcactus7
    @maxcactus7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +221

    I'm glad to see you referencing Lucky Gunner's videos Paul. Both you and Chris Baker provide some of the least biased, most objective and level headed advice on YT. Great job as always.

    • @markshippoli8918
      @markshippoli8918 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I totally second that statement! Always top-notch presentations by both gentlemen 👍😆

    • @BrockOBauma
      @BrockOBauma 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I'd like to see a collaboration video with Manny and Paul.

    • @reedkellner6447
      @reedkellner6447 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I also thought it was excellent that Paul and his team did a test simply to verify that a noted phenomenon did exist, as another person investigating such phenomena had found. It wasn't a particularly sensational result, either. He more or less confirmed what Lucky Gunner had noted. Now, I know Paul isn't trying to do a rigorous scientific study, but this process of independently verifying another's result and publishing it, even when the results aren't flashy or groundbreaking, is something even major research institutions are getting less good at these days. He showed you all of his notes and data collection. He's almost inadvertently doing better science than actual scientists, these days.

    • @frankwrogg2515
      @frankwrogg2515 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lucky gunners M1 video was the best of 2019 in my opinion 🤣🤣

    • @reshpeck
      @reshpeck 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@reedkellner6447 You've got that right. Scientific rigor is secondary to ideology and tunnel vision, and the peer review process is utterly broken.
      Sincerely, A Highly Disillusioned PhD Student

  • @snuffygrunt2842
    @snuffygrunt2842 4 ปีที่แล้ว +253

    "Could that flyer hit an innocent bystander?"
    Without several meat targets scattered at random locations surrounding a meat target...
    We will never know.

    • @michaelanderson1859
      @michaelanderson1859 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      If the flyer hits a meat target and no one bites down on the pellet when they grill it, did it really hit an innocent bystander or a did it hit the meat target that was donated to the dogs. Have you ever seen his dogs? Bernese mountain dog about 120 lbs and Irish wolfhound close 180+

    • @Operator8282
      @Operator8282 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Want to see!!!

    • @crankysaint
      @crankysaint 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@michaelanderson1859 Gotta love Irish Wolfhounds. An old Army buddy of mine had one. He called it a lap dog. If it chooses to sit on your lap, there's nothing you can do about it.

    • @dr.floridamanphd
      @dr.floridamanphd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I like the way you think!

    • @denmanfite3156
      @denmanfite3156 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      [angry pork rib and bag of orange noises]

  • @TTiger86268
    @TTiger86268 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Saw "Paul Harrel" as soon as I sat and turned on tablet, Immediately had to watch.

  • @jupiterjunk
    @jupiterjunk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    .
    And that's why I'm sticking to my...
    Federal Law Enforcement
    12 gauge
    2 3/4"
    8 pellet
    00 Buck
    with Flight Control wad
    .

    • @flightlesschicken7769
      @flightlesschicken7769 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What about the rarer 12 pellet load?

    • @xtreme4stringbass
      @xtreme4stringbass 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      I like to control the flight of all my wads.

    • @starkparker16
      @starkparker16 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is that a good choice?

    • @marzcapone9939
      @marzcapone9939 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@starkparker16 All the flight control, even the Hornady Versa-Tite wad, has been great IME. I have a 14" SBS Rem 870, with a fixed modified choke, and the groups from that are very predictable, no fliers.

    • @starkparker16
      @starkparker16 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@marzcapone9939 I appreciate the info but I would have settled for "You be the judge."

  • @SnekoftheOzarks
    @SnekoftheOzarks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Years of watching Paul has taught me at least one thing: Remington G&W Box and Winchester White Box ammo is really reliable! And I'm glad I'm not the only one who's noticed the lack of quality control on Federal blue box ammo!

    • @thomasraahauge5231
      @thomasraahauge5231 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a slight hearing impediment, so whenever he lists the ammo, it sounds like chef Johanson to me . . .

    • @phantomfreakf4
      @phantomfreakf4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Years ago as a teenager dove hunting one season, I had a few boxes of Federal bird shot and Winchester bird shot. I noticed I was getting a failure to fire, i.e. trigger wouldn’t pull. Noticed that with the Federal ammo the bolt would not completely close ( Remington 1100 20 gauge). Butted one of the Winchester and Federal together, and the rim of the Federal was slightly larger in diameter. Last time I used Federal shotgun ammo. Never had any issues with Remington or Winchester ammo though.

    • @jalan8171
      @jalan8171 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Travis Thacker, Cost cutting that cuts efficiency, effectiveness and reliability (plus added gov't regs) results in poor economy and poorer results.

  • @kraigquebus
    @kraigquebus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    We will have to take this to taufledermaus, and slow mode.

    • @1fanger888
      @1fanger888 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Would be nice collaboration. Might be very revealing.

    • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That would be pretty good. He's great on those slow-mos.

    • @6Sally5
      @6Sally5 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kraig Means Excellent idea!

    • @accidentalheadclunkers8517
      @accidentalheadclunkers8517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      For sure. He'll be pissed he didn't think of that. Hope you sent that idea to him too, and we can pretend this never happened 🤐

    • @Vares65
      @Vares65 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would they do a buckshot video? They seem to specialize in slugs.

  • @robertscott2210
    @robertscott2210 4 ปีที่แล้ว +168

    The one thumbs down was from suprema ammunition. 😁

    • @Hawk1966
      @Hawk1966 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Or Federal. . .

    • @jamescooper2618
      @jamescooper2618 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I thought it was a Gun Nuts fan.

    • @jackd2083
      @jackd2083 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      James Cooper
      He has fans still?

    • @jamescooper2618
      @jamescooper2618 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jackd2083 Couple

    • @konagolden4209
      @konagolden4209 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jamescooper2618 Mom & Dad?

  • @armyofshea7941
    @armyofshea7941 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Paul, love your presentations. Scientific method + firearms + you = entertaining and informative. I was the judge.

  • @soulesailor
    @soulesailor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Lucky gunner makes some very high quality videos, nice to see Paul give him a nice bump.

  • @MGH5016
    @MGH5016 4 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    What I found interesting is how different the pattern can be from 4 shots of the same ammunition from the same shotgun.

    • @jshicke
      @jshicke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I am betting I could hit the cardboard 'somewhere' by firing a shot gun that fast. Is THAT a flyer? probably not, its just me.

    • @johnterpack3940
      @johnterpack3940 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'd be really curious to see if handloads were any better. If you loaded shells with exactly the same amount of powder and crimped everything exactly the same, would they behave better? Take the mass production tolerances out of the equation.

    • @OneSquaredG
      @OneSquaredG 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I too was quite surprised by, what I considered to be, the relatively large difference from shot to shot with the same ammo and same gun. That would never fly in rifle rounds.

    • @Eagl3xStrik3
      @Eagl3xStrik3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's shot for ya.

    • @ScottKenny1978
      @ScottKenny1978 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Serious pattern entropy demonstration!

  • @workingguy6666
    @workingguy6666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    I honestly could have watched Paul test five more different brands in the very same fashion this evening. What outstanding entertainment while - at the same time - teaching us. Which raises the question - why is this format with his presentations at the beginning and end of each new load so pleasing? I don't even understand it. 667'th 'like' for the video.

    • @looka91
      @looka91 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      i think it's because it's an old school type of presenting - on point, systematical and logical and with a lot of knowledge compressed in a relatively short time (even in an 1 hour video every minute gives you information so interesting it's easy to rewatch it). most other youtubers are annoying with their macho bullshit (as Paul often says "tattooed bearded guys"), stupid jokes, usually with obnoxious music and overediting, not to mention constantly pursuing the viewer to like/subscribe and advertise stuff.

  • @lazaglider
    @lazaglider 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Ah, few things make me laugh, but when Paul described the suprema as 'premium...' the look on his face had me in stitches.

  • @terryschiller2625
    @terryschiller2625 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    This is why I enjoy your channel Paul. I learned something new.
    Never have heard of the ninth pellet flyer before. Thank you and your crew for all your hard work.

  • @828enigma6
    @828enigma6 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    When my department used 9 pellet 00 Winchester or Remington, invariably I'd have one flyer out of each round fired at 20 yards. Using Federal Reduced Recoil 8 PLT 00 with the flight control wad, I got 6" groups and no flyers. One guy in our group would get the same size group at 40 yards as I got at 20. His Mossberg 14" barrel had a modified choke as well. We were all impressed.

  • @jm9371
    @jm9371 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I like how you professionally worked through the malfunction and did not just edit it out. Excellent video; until now, I was not aware of this phenomenon.

  • @voldier0
    @voldier0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    0:47 I do so completely enjoy it when different people concur. Excellent video as always.

  • @Paladin1873
    @Paladin1873 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    In the 1980s I visited the Department of Energy nuclear security program where I was shown short barrel pump shotguns that were fitted with full chokes. This was done to provide greater hit probability at extended range. It would be interesting to run your same test loads through a modified choke and a full choke to see if the groups tighten up or if the pellets deform and spread out further. I also suggest testing reduced recoil rounds to see if they enhance pattern size.

    • @sgtcwhatley
      @sgtcwhatley 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can speak on the modified choke performance. Using Remington tac 8 the pattern is larger than with an Improved Cylinder choke.

    • @troy9477
      @troy9477 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agree with Sgt Whatley. I get good patterns with an IC choke tube in my 20" 870. Any more choke seems ro open up the patterns due to the extra constriction probably causing pellets to run into each other. I get great slug accuracy too, so i am set.

    • @Paladin1873
      @Paladin1873 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@troy9477 I'll have to do some more in-depth testing, but with short barrel shotguns and open chokes I have gotten decent patterns at 25 yards. By decent I mean they hit a man-sized silhouette. Where Paul lives such testing may not be possible unless a smooth-bore "firearm" and arm brace are used. Slugs have offered no problem at this range either.

  • @bume7609
    @bume7609 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    The picture quality looks nice Paul, seems like something changed. Grats on 500k!

    • @dansands6363
      @dansands6363 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The audio quality has also immensely improved over the course of the past few months!

    • @Hjerte_Verke
      @Hjerte_Verke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Then again there's nothing like Paul's older "VHS style" low resolution videos to put me in a warm, nostalgic frame of mind...;^)

  • @connormcmillan6761
    @connormcmillan6761 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'm a simple man, I see Paul, I click and like

  • @ManetInAEternum
    @ManetInAEternum 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Hey Paul, hope all is well with you. Love the content as always. Stay safe and God bless

  • @peteraugust5295
    @peteraugust5295 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    that echo is incredible. If you have good ears you can probably hear the shots roaming around that valles today.

  • @calebdehart6651
    @calebdehart6651 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    "Oh, that little guy? I wouldn't worry about that little guy..."

  • @Gideon_Judges6
    @Gideon_Judges6 4 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    When Chuck Norris goes to sleep at night, he checks under his bed for Paul Harrell. Great presentation as usual!

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Chuck Norris carries Paul Harrell for self-defense.

  • @MF-lr5ct
    @MF-lr5ct 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I very much agree that Paul's cleaning and maintenance regimen would be very popular series. Thank you Sir for what you are doing here.

  • @mmcss1155
    @mmcss1155 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul I know it's a little late but I just watched your rebuttal video. I DO find you long winded but NEVER boring. I enjoy every minute of you videos and appreciate your dry sense of humor.

  • @nwolinsP
    @nwolinsP 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This is a great statistical question. I am not convinced that we are seeing anything other than randomness. But an hard to convince.

    • @utubesuxbigdonkeybal
      @utubesuxbigdonkeybal 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This is my thought as well.
      It would be interesting to take a sample of several groupings, compute the centroid of each grouping, and then record distance from centroid of each pellet. I would be curious to see the normality of the distribution of distances from centroid.

    • @1djbecker
      @1djbecker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Statistics can be surprising. But I don't think that we are seeing anything surprising here.
      I was curious if there was a physical effect that resulted in a single pellet consistently being deflected off-target. I don't see any evidence for that. Instead I'm seeing so much variation that people can see patterns when none exist. Certainly there is enough variation that only a larger sample set would produce valid results.

  • @AR-GuidesAndMore
    @AR-GuidesAndMore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Federal is really high tech giving you in effect 7x buckshot and a slug. :D So you dont have to buy the fancy Hyper ammo for that effect.

    • @thedealerofdeath100
      @thedealerofdeath100 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its whats loaded up above the bedroom door right now. ...why do i use it. Simply because of where i live. The middle of no where kansans and it is whats available to me.

    • @williwonti
      @williwonti 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Federal usually has the two part wads which is why they work better.

    • @redisrandom5802
      @redisrandom5802 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Winchester makes a round with buckshot and a slug. Pretty mean stuff.

    • @chriswerb7482
      @chriswerb7482 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@redisrandom5802 That's effectively "Buck n' Ball" from the American Civil War.

  • @jeromeleach9316
    @jeromeleach9316 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just wished to drop you a line Paul saying that this old vet appreciates the information, wit, and humor that you deliver. Good job Sir! Or as they used to say when I served, BZ (Bravo Zulu).

  • @unclejohnbulleit2671
    @unclejohnbulleit2671 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Paul, FWIW, I retired from the USCG many years ago, and we shot the Rem 870 using 12 ga. 00 exclusively. I was a firearms and use of force instructor. We used various manf. ammunition, it just depended on what we were sent. Our targets were man sized silhouettes, cant recall the manf. What I do recall, distinctly, was that when using Federal ammo, we often had one flyer that either got the paper but not the silhouette or hit the cardboard, and this was very, very common. HTH!

    • @mikeseigel6566
      @mikeseigel6566 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They were Transtar II green or blue colored targets. And the ammo we were issued was military ammo, it just depended who got the contract. I saw federal,Winchester and Olin 12oobuck over a 20 year career in the CG. Some of it was crap and some of it was ok.

  • @KC-bg1th
    @KC-bg1th 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was trying to figure out why I like Paul so much, and I realized that he’s like one of those teachers you had in high school that were very serious and strict, but were also always the teachers that were the most fair, and willing to teach; the classes you didn’t mess around in. hahaha

  • @Darkside007
    @Darkside007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    There's more replication on Paul's channel than most University science departments :P

    • @maxk5038
      @maxk5038 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is that a good or bad thing?

    • @SBCBears
      @SBCBears 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@maxk5038 Cuz unies typically don't replicate research. They are funded to do original research.

    • @vidard9863
      @vidard9863 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@SBCBears yeah, but you would hope that they would run their own experiments more than once...

    • @jshicke
      @jshicke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@maxk5038You be the judge.

    • @maxk5038
      @maxk5038 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @PCShogun good one lol

  • @vedantateacher9080
    @vedantateacher9080 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We used to have a saying that: "There is a Lawyer attached to every bullet (or pellet)". The flyers are important.

  • @joshuagibson2520
    @joshuagibson2520 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for all you do Paul. You make some great contributions to any conversation.

  • @SmokesKwazukii
    @SmokesKwazukii 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Paul could you do a presentation on full chokes in shotguns and the pros/cons and different effect on various ammunitions?

  • @jamesglenn6461
    @jamesglenn6461 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    the malfunctions concern me the most.

    • @jshicke
      @jshicke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      That because you were not hit by the 9th pellet.

    • @do_yeets
      @do_yeets 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jshicke Haha!

    • @RustyorBroken
      @RustyorBroken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      No question he can operate a shotgun better than most. Though, I wonder if maybe he didn't get the action all the way back before starting forward to chamber the next round. He's quick, perhaps a bit too quick.

    • @westcoastwarriorsarchive7929
      @westcoastwarriorsarchive7929 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@RustyorBroken well thats how he operates shotguns in all of his shotgun videos. I havent seen that happening in his previous videos, and it was a remmington 870. So that could be the issue. Paul may also have been having an off day.

    • @DigitalRX2r
      @DigitalRX2r 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Def short strokes, you can see it if you play it at .25x speed. Just one of the down sides of pump actions when running them quickly. One of the malfunctions was his hand completely slipped off. User error.

  • @justinheads5751
    @justinheads5751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    that federal buck ammo is like an athlete's protective gear, it generally keeps two pellets in the cup

  • @tonysasso9588
    @tonysasso9588 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul thank you for your service my son and I love your videos I have been on TH-cam for a year and a half you give the gun community a good name God bless you

  • @CeltKnight
    @CeltKnight 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    It seems, particularly with shotguns, each individual gun/ammo selection must be matched well to achieve the best results. I know that's true with all guns, but it seems especially noticeable with shotguns. When my old agency got several Remington 870s with 14", modified choke barrels, I went out with the entire batch, shooting the issued ammo and found every single one of them shot a different pattern to different points of aim (and this would have been same lot number on the ammo as well, all from the same shipment). All did well, but some shot more consistently low or high, left or right, slightly bigger or smaller patters. Of course, I took my pick of the litter ;). The standard 20" bbl, rifle sighted 870 I had before shot pretty good with buckshot (I don't remember specifically what the pattern was but they all stayed on the silhouette even from 25 yards so long as I put any effort at all into it). But with 1 oz Federal slugs (this was before "Tactical" and "low recoil" slugs) I could make all the holes touch on the slug course which ran from 50, 40, and 25 yards. I needed to drift the rear sight a bit to bring it closer to point of aim but it was an impressive group. Again, all of them were okay, but some better than others and we couldn't really pick and choose our ammo, we got what was issued. I tried an older issued "Featherweight" Ithaca and (again, with issued ammo) the results were nothing to write home about. Ditto with the Hi-Standard shotgun we had as well. In fact, I eventually claimed that bright, shiny, nickle-plated Hi-Standard and kept it loaded with rubber buckshot and rubber ball ammo. It was so distinctive from the other guns we had. Now, all of the results improved when we got the Flite-Control wad "Tactical" buckshot. Again, though, some did better than others. My 14" modified choke barrel gun actually shot worse than some of the cylinder bore guns, though by "worse" the pattern was still ridiculously small even from way farther out than I thought buckshot would normally be used. Interestingly, I think all of our buckshot was 8 pellet.

    • @gelnat7100
      @gelnat7100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I noticed the same thing with my issued shotguns. First one was an Ithica with 20 inch barrel. Shot good patterns but kept dropping shells when being racked. Second one was a Smith and Wesson 20 inch barrel. Great patterns but very stiff action. Most recent is a Remington 870 20 inch barrel. Smooth action but does not pattern as well as the other two.

    • @devincook2736
      @devincook2736 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That seems rather interesting, that smoothbores firing shot could show preferences. We kind of expect it when it comes to rifled barrels and rimfires, but that's probably the first I've heard of someone testing a batch of shotguns and seeing that they are not all alike.

    • @craigbenz4835
      @craigbenz4835 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      With that 20" rifle sighted 870 what difference, if any, did you notice in POI between the buckshot and slugs?

  • @chanceheaps6720
    @chanceheaps6720 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Hey Paul, I recently had a scare in the night, I grabbed my M92 from my night stand and started to clear the house, after the living room I realized I had no idea how to properly clear a room by my self. Anyways I left the window open and the blinds where knocked down by the wind... But I'm now conserned I don't know the proper way to clear a room, would you mind making a video showing how you would clear a room by yourself, preferably with an auto loading hand gun, as that is what I have. Thankyou.

    • @copcuffs9973
      @copcuffs9973 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Until Paul puts out a video on that you might check out War Poet he did some YT videos on that topic before starting his own platform. I think his older videos are still on YT.

    • @JaronActual
      @JaronActual 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      First tip on clearing a room: DON'T DO IT if you can help it. Room clearing is dangerous enough for trained teams, let alone when it's just yourself. Unless it's absolutely necessary to go check on someone else, it's safer to take up a defensive position, ideally one that allows you to cover avenues of approach for the other occupants in your home.

    • @jonathangriffiths2499
      @jonathangriffiths2499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Jaron absolutely right . Call the cops and cover the stars till they arrive . Do nt try being a one man swat squad .

    • @chubbycatfish4573
      @chubbycatfish4573 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Like others have said not really a good idea, but a mirror on a stick couldn't hurt...

    • @tellmeitsnottaken
      @tellmeitsnottaken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's no way he's going to do a tutorial on that. He already has to issue enough disclaimers on his videos where he simply tests ammo or weapons.

  • @maxthefacts
    @maxthefacts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for your efforts Paul. As always informative, entertaining, and educational. Don't stop what you do on YT. Its important that we are not fed fake news and take it for Gospel regarding firearm matters and your presentations keep us on the straight and narrow.

  • @InGratitudeIam
    @InGratitudeIam 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hornady makes a reduced recoil load with only eight 00 pellets. Avg velocity, depending on variant, is 1,100 fps - 1,300 fps (or thereabouts). Reduced recoil/velocity loads tend to produce tighter groups. The reason is simple, less force at the muzzle to disrupt the load. Combine that with only 8 pellets and you have the makings of what could be a "no-flyer" load.
    Thanks for taking the time.

  • @knrdash
    @knrdash 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    "Maybe" it's "hard to tell" but I really miss "being the judge".

    • @kimberlydrennon4982
      @kimberlydrennon4982 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I, for one, don't want the LEOs that inevitably watch his videos to "be the judge"

  • @snappycattimesten
    @snappycattimesten 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Get notification. Check. Saved to play later playlist. Check. Grab dinner, get comfy, and watch what you call a professional. You be the judge.

  • @mattbrown5511
    @mattbrown5511 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The short version is; Buy small boxes of buckshot and find the one type your shotgun likes the best. Another great video by Paul and the crew.

  • @joehosier6187
    @joehosier6187 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know I'm saying this two years later but man, it makes me happy to know you watch lucky gunner. I love Chris and before your channel came into my life he was my gold standard no-nonsense scientific gun content.

  • @richardburnett-_
    @richardburnett-_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Rem. blue box did well imo, having the opposite of fliers: stickers, or "no spreaders," a good trait if centered.

  • @mattc1602
    @mattc1602 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Paul looking at super man. “They call you super man, I’m not impressed”.

  • @adamgirard9453
    @adamgirard9453 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    And I absolutely love your choice of words for explaining simple facts and just the way they are

  • @1mulekicker
    @1mulekicker 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tumbling dice effect, when your hot you're hot, when your not you're not. Lead out at the muzzle has to have some contact and resulting flight deviations. I'm no expert, but the term scatter gun comes to mind. Great info!

  • @lehampton1
    @lehampton1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Paul and Lucky Gunner are 1. Verifiable 2. Falsifiable and 3. Repeatable.
    Gun Nut Media is 1. Intoxicatable 2. Self-delusional and 3. Laughable.

    • @thomasraahauge5231
      @thomasraahauge5231 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That one had me laugh out loud enough to almost soil my underwear 😁😁😁

    • @missingnola3823
      @missingnola3823 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Be sure to count those on your fingers in the "proper" way for Gun Nards. Longtime Paul viewers will know what I mean.

    • @jamescooper2618
      @jamescooper2618 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I concur.

    • @lehampton1
      @lehampton1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      MissingNOLA
      1 ☝️ 2 🖕

    • @missingnola3823
      @missingnola3823 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lehampton1 Exactly! Just remember to keep your finger off the birdie until pointed at the intended target. :)

  • @ajhatti2011
    @ajhatti2011 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Im usually this early, and my wife just sighs. 😒

    • @lemoncoke6173
      @lemoncoke6173 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      She sounds like a real battle axe.

    • @dr.floridamanphd
      @dr.floridamanphd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      My wife sighs too. But it’s usually at my shenanigans. Google me. I’m all over the damn place!

  • @cpttrips236
    @cpttrips236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Watching a Paul Harrell video and getting a new Paul Harrell video... this day just keeps getting better.

  • @jerrepeak9083
    @jerrepeak9083 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I enjoyed the video, Paul. Like I've told you before, I was in the sporting goods business for 35 yrs and I always found that buckshot and slugs generally shoot better groups out of cylinder choke barrels rather than a barrel with any choke in it. Of course, every once in a while, you'll find a choked barrel that will group pretty well with buckshot and slugs, but that's usually an exception rather than the rule. Again, interesting video !

  • @unlockaut8547
    @unlockaut8547 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Paul's clothing would be perfect camo in a cartboard factory.

    • @TRIIGGAVELLI
      @TRIIGGAVELLI 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ha! Gottem!

    • @svtirefire
      @svtirefire 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What's cartboard?

    • @thomasraahauge5231
      @thomasraahauge5231 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@svtirefire The paper-ish beige stuff a lot of boxes are made from. He pinned the silhouette targets to large sheets of cardboard.

    • @cmtptr
      @cmtptr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thomas Raahauge you described cardboard. svtirefire was asking what is cartboard.

    • @potentiallyaheretic9281
      @potentiallyaheretic9281 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@svtirefire A type of leather you get from skinning a cart.

  • @VH_Rules
    @VH_Rules 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Someday I’m gonna find that leisure suit video in the intro....my vote for the action doll clothing that can be interchanged! 😂👍

    • @codyaaron2129
      @codyaaron2129 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I believe it was a presentation on snub nose .38 revolvers, or on a specific usage of them

    • @pbp6741
      @pbp6741 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You’re welcome: th-cam.com/video/2Ru1SldF5BM/w-d-xo.html

    • @VH_Rules
      @VH_Rules 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      PB P Thank you! Paul at his best!

    • @daveholden2711
      @daveholden2711 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@codyaaron2129 "snub nose .38 revolvers" Natch, Jackson! Now gimme some skin!

  • @davesbrewing
    @davesbrewing 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, You have the most grounded Pew-tube channels. Let the facts speak for themselves and test every hypothesis with rigorous and repeatable experiments. This is why I respect you .

  • @adamgirard9453
    @adamgirard9453 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing Paul I got to say I absolutely love your dry humor to the stupid ignorant questions or opinions people make you are a pillar of virtue

  • @phantomspaceman
    @phantomspaceman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "Premium Suprema" got a decent laugh out of me.

  • @tanglediver
    @tanglediver 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    One dislike in 16 minutes, I'ld call THAT one, a flyer!! And yes, THAT one has a few friends by now.

  • @CharlesB147
    @CharlesB147 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautifully done. Properly empirically tested. And very enjoyable.

  • @camerongover8459
    @camerongover8459 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how he doesn't hesitate to say he got the idea for the video from lucky gunner. Dont think a lot of creators would do that. And it was a serious nugget of wisdom he dropped for a young guy like me when he said "good science is verifiable, deniable, and repeatable"

  • @glxbe
    @glxbe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    maybe it's a 1st pellet flyer and the 9th one is doing its best

  • @AshGreen359
    @AshGreen359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What you do is use a rifled barrel, then everything is a flier

  • @_kp_556
    @_kp_556 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tactical rifleman makes a good argument against shotguns for home defense... in a hostage situation if a bad guy has your loved one in a headlock with a gun pointing at you saying that the shotgun load is too dangerous for that situation being if you shoot the perp you can also injure or kill the hostage..love both of your channels they’re very informative

  • @evankowalski
    @evankowalski 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good information for a brand-new-to-shotguns 12ga owner like myself. Thank you Paul!

  • @nemisous83
    @nemisous83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I don't think the "9th pellet flyer" phenomena is enough a difference to matter because most human torsos are larger than most paper targets and there isnt any recorded instances of 9th pellet flyer fatalities or injuries. So is 12 gauge 9 pellet still good for home defense im going to say yes.....is it good for a burglar holding your waifu pillow hostage while you deliver a cheesy 80's one line before turning him into somebody that you used to know? I'm going to say no.

    • @NoQuestions4sked
      @NoQuestions4sked 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      should have ended with "you be the judge"

  • @VikingGruntpa
    @VikingGruntpa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Makes me wonder a couple of things.
    Why does that one pellet tend to be a flyer? And I know this might seem odd but I wonder if one pellet would tend to be a flyer if you shot a shell of eight pellets. Just a thought.

    • @pbp6741
      @pbp6741 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      chris carlson Supposedly because of the difference in geometry of packing nine versus eight pellets in a 12-gauge casing.

    • @sgtcwhatley
      @sgtcwhatley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If I remember correctly when Remington introduced Tac 8 buckshot years ago one of the selling points was it had 8 pellets which were stacked in an order different from their traditional 9 pellet load. This, they claimed, eliminated the "9th pellet flyer". I think Tom Givens discusses 8 vs 9 pellet loads in his classes explaining how the pellets are arranged in the shell has an impact on their pattern on the target. I have not heard this directly from Mr Givens but had heard it attributed to him several times by people who have attended his classes.

    • @itsapittie
      @itsapittie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pbp6741 Yeah, LuckyGunner said that has been proposed to explain it, although IIRC he didn't actually try to explain it himself. However, I'm now quite confident the phenomenon is real and the packing geometry seems like a reasonable explanation. I'd be interested to know what would happen with 12 pellets of 00 buckshot.

    • @Pseudo-Geek
      @Pseudo-Geek 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your assumption is correct according to this article: www.luckygunner.com/lounge/more-stuff-you-should-know-about-buckshot-part-2/

    • @pbp6741
      @pbp6741 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kelton Oliver Twelve or 15 pellets (3” shells) would have a similar 3 on 3 on 3 ... packing as nine-pellet.
      Also, I neglected to note this packing is specific to double-aught in 12-gauge.

  • @sombra6153
    @sombra6153 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    20 years ago, I’d see frequent fliers with 9 pellet out of 18 inch cylinder bore barrels. Then someone got a great idea to switch to 14 inch barrels, and the whole shot patterns were all over the place. After an introduction to Vang Comp and adoption of reduced recoil 00 buck, patterns tightened up considerably. Later, Federal Tactical law enforcement 00 buck came along. Out of Ann 18 cylinder bore 870, I saw groups out to 25 yards that were incredibly tight. As far as the results filmed in this video, I’d never seen shot cups getting in the way. Interesting stuff.

  • @tonyv8925
    @tonyv8925 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Greetings, Mr. Harrell from the lockdown state of Michigan. I am really impressed with the phenomenon of the 9th pellet flier. This presentation is why I love your channel. Simple, easy to understand, and just plain fun to learn new things. Great video, thank you very much.

  • @chubbycatfish4573
    @chubbycatfish4573 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Wow, 6 seconds ago. Very early this time.

  • @mtgAzim
    @mtgAzim 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Uploaded 1 minute ago. 89 views, 82 "likes" 👍
    Good job gents, keepit up!

  • @ShoreDude105
    @ShoreDude105 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This definitely gave me something to think about. I have a Mossberg 500 & a Remington 870, each with 20 inch barrels. As soon as the ranges are allowed to open again in NJ after the "Beer" restrictions I'm going to perform these same tests to determine which are more effective and safe for my use in a home defense shotgun needs. Have a Happy & Healthy Memorial Day Weekend. Right now it's raining here at the Jersey Shore so we'll see how the weekend goes for us still living under the many "beer" restrictions.

  • @richarddavis1884
    @richarddavis1884 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Perhaps one pellet occasionally collides with another pellet or the rotating shot cup. Good presentation, thank you Paul!

  • @brianhumphreys1660
    @brianhumphreys1660 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Last time I came this early my girlfriend left... lol love the videos!

    • @copcuffs9973
      @copcuffs9973 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha ha, I have the reverse problem. One girl joked that she might have to pay me to quit; I kept going (W/ no little blue pill) longer than she could handle orgasming.

  • @lsdrat1
    @lsdrat1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Dang, that was a short one. I didn't even have time to finish my drink.

    • @KevinSmith-yh6tl
      @KevinSmith-yh6tl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's what she said!😅

    • @RustyorBroken
      @RustyorBroken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My advice to you is to start drinking faster. 🤣

    • @GeorgiaRidgerunner
      @GeorgiaRidgerunner 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well go start another paul harrel video ...then you have a great excuse to have another drink

    • @d.hayward5232
      @d.hayward5232 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you Caleb????
      No, he would have had at least 2 watered down bourbon drinks. 🤪

    • @KevinSmith-yh6tl
      @KevinSmith-yh6tl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@d.hayward5232 CALEB,what a twat.

  • @bassettraceengines
    @bassettraceengines 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    At our LEA we noticed that Shells that have sat for several years seem to kick less, pattern off center, and spread more. When new shot gun ammo comes in the groups shoot tighter, more accurate, and kicks harder.

  • @robertjordan445
    @robertjordan445 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fur, feathers, or facemask. If Paul's hunting you, be afraid...….be very afraid ! Another great video showing the value of testing ammo to see what works best in your firearm. Thanks Paul

  • @throngcleaver
    @throngcleaver 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When I reload buckshot, I leave the 9th pellet out. Sometimes it's hard to tell which one is #9 though. ;)

  • @peteraugust5295
    @peteraugust5295 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Actually none of those impacts were "flyers" in my eyes. If you would continuously shoot the same sport you would get aperfectly round hole pretty quickly, that is because there are notz flyers, but at such a low number of impacts per shot, statisticall there will be groups and we tend to pick our groups as such that there is a flyer.
    That is not predictable though, as your "hit zone" always is a pretty perfect circle and all bullets will hit within that circle.

  • @laughingram7287
    @laughingram7287 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did watch the Lucky Gunner’s video on this a while back and wondered if you had ever come across this phenomenon or if you had already covered this topic in a video I hadn’t seen yet.
    Thank you Paul for doing this video.
    👍🏻

  • @bradrtorgersen_videos
    @bradrtorgersen_videos 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One interesting thing about those man-shaped Dirty Bird targets: if shot at a distance of 25 yards, the aspect is more like trying to shoot an *actual* man-sized target at 50 yards. Because the Dirty Birds are only 12"x18". I didn't realize this difference until I was shooting an M16A2 "C" static qualification paper side-by-side with that exact black silhouette (red sternum) from Dirty Bird, two weekends ago. The head-and-shoulders portion of the silhouette on the Dirty Bird is approximately the same size as the 50 meter head-and-shoulders silhouette on the "C" qual paper.

  • @ditzydoo4378
    @ditzydoo4378 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm sure this episode will have a lotta Buck-Shot in it... 0_o Oh dear that was simply horrible, but it had to be said. ~_^

  • @montaramike
    @montaramike 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome to see two of my favorite channels doing videos that compliment each other

  • @usnclark
    @usnclark 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Professor Harrell coming in with the answers I really care about right now. Thank you sir

  • @gunfisher4661
    @gunfisher4661 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That reminds me of back in the day a phenomenon that people used to try to take advantage of. That was at turkey shoots on the weekends. People who used to frequent them of course would choose their shot gun that would throw the best pattern then go thru the brands of shells that were approved for the shoot and again choose the one with the best pattern and then one would note the label as a reference and rotate it in the barrel each shot until you found the best shot pattern. Then at the shoot you would load the shell with the label facing a certain point every time. Whether it was actually fact or not was little debate as quite a few turkey shooters used that technique in the hopes of bringing home a turkey or ham.

    • @daveholden2711
      @daveholden2711 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gotta have got long-range shot patterns to bring down those flying hams!

  • @flightparamedic505
    @flightparamedic505 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. Thanks Paul !

  • @altruisticscoundrel
    @altruisticscoundrel 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    As usual, your productions are quite educational!
    I have gun topic you may shy away from: Impromptu guns built from hardware store products that are easily constructed with hand tools.

  • @jeffsarahsee1543
    @jeffsarahsee1543 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for posting this. I saw the video you mentioned. I love your method of shooting and racking the slide as one motion.

  • @russellwall1964
    @russellwall1964 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another excellent video. I always appreciate your attention to detail and honest assessments. Please keep these coming!

  • @Blakelysworld358
    @Blakelysworld358 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm used to shooting buckshot through chokes in longer barrels, what a difference shorter barrel cylinder bore makes!

  • @oldschool9932
    @oldschool9932 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Take away being.....be it your favorite 22lr, your 12GA or any firearm in your collection; know the point of impact for the chosen load in said weapon.
    Look.....it's not raining but will be in an hour or so. Thank you Paul for all you and your crew do and for the time and effort it takes.

  • @414thst
    @414thst 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a shotgun owner, I wanna say thanks for calling this to my attention. I was unaware of this. Glad I learned something today. That's why I love your channel Mr. Harrell.