We're a small but dedicated team on a mission to provide free access to educational content. If you find our content valuable, please support us by subscribing, liking, and sharing our videos. Your engagement makes all the difference!
Young Turks were Donmeh. These were Jews or Crypto Jews who pretended to be Muslims converted but they didn’t convert. These Donmeh installed Arabs Jews to rule Gulf countries.
And if the other side is supported by the brits and germans and etc, then it is not a side to call any act against a rebel. Writing before reading is funny isn't it?!
@@mr.o8539 total bullshit, we send trains full of gold to hejaz every fking year, we didnt touch their language, their culture, all we told them was, we are brothers, but they went with nationalism and took away al quds from the entire ummah by betraying the khalifa, so dont come up here with your third class citizen bullshit, we treated you as equals or even better then the Turks in anatolia, and you guys behaved like total animals towards us
@@mr.o8539 where? Did we change your language? Did we change your culture? Did we force you to do things you didn't want? Now you are not governed by the Turks and you live as first class citizens in Syria, Iraq and Palestine. Congratulations
The Ottoman Empire was a colonial power. It was the successor of the Roman Empire. The Ottomans made Arabs and Muslim youth fight and die for themselves, used those lands to collect taxes, but in return did not make any investments in those lands and those lands remained undeveloped. The Ottoman Empire turned its back on the Arabs and face to the West. It had Arab intellectuals killed so that they would not criticize the corrupt administration of the Empire, which had fallen into pleasure, debauchery and waste. When the Ottoman Empire had just arrived, the Arab geography was experiencing its golden age. It was ahead of its time in subjects such as Ethics, Science, Medicine, Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Geometry and enlightened Europe. However, the Ottomans misused this wealth and development and spent this power on pleasure with women in the palace. Using this power, the Ottomans bridged the sectarian differences among Muslims and took the Middle East behind the times, just like America does today. During the Ottoman period, CEOs had a privileged place in the administration. Today, if Islam is associated with terrorism and underdevelopment, the Ottoman Empire is most responsible for this. Arabs and Muslims gave power to the Ottoman Empire and a great responsibility fell to the Ottoman Empire, but the Ottoman Empire abused this power and misrepresented Islam. If we are in this situation today, it is not the fault of the Palestinians, but the fault of those who shirk their responsibility. Stop using the CEOnists' propaganda of blaming the Palestinians for everything.
As an Arab I agree, However Ottomans in the that time were not implementing shariah and overthro the Sultan rule and accepted western ideologies, so Islamically they have no rights to hold our lands until they implement Shariah and rule by Islam and throw all western ideologies out.
Turks betrayed the ways of caliphate for centries, all they cared about was war. Arabs shoulda never allowed them to have power without being fully arabnized, that was the arabs fault
@@nadeemahmed6596 Yeah if I'm not entirely mistaken, Syria was gone in 1920, Iraq was gone in the 1950s and Jordan is up next(they're already screwed rn)
Greeting my brother. I am a Turk and we love him with all our hearts. He had the heart of a lion. He served his Caliph and the Ummah with Honour. He is at peace in the lands of a brother country. I wish to send my gratitude to you, your beautify country and your wonderful people. Selam Aleyküm my brother 🇹🇷❤️🇩🇿
His tomb is in Istanbul, Besiktas and was personally made by another legend Mimar Sinan in 1541 and from that day till this day, whenever an Ottoman or Turkish navy vessel goes on a mission. They first visit the Tomb of Barbaros Hayrettin pasha and perform a ÇİMARİVA greeting. (all soldiers stands next to each other side by side on the deck and salute his tomb) You can see this greeting in the video below, although the quality is very poor. th-cam.com/video/QYUm428I3_c/w-d-xo.html
@@Isra-hl4jx thank you very much for your kind words brother. Oruç his brother is buried here. Turkey is a sister country for us. And the Ottoman sultans called our country “house of Djihâd” thanks to barbaros Pasha and his successors who made our country’s name so feared and respected. So I hope I can one day visit his tomb and kiss the green flag.
@@crispusallen3865 originally it was to tackle the threat of german empire. But then they "improvised" seeing that the ottoman empire jump into the war.
Turkish garrison of Medina didn't surrender to Hussein bin Ali, in fact they didn't even surrender when WW1 ended! They surrendered at 10 January 1919, 3 months after than Ottoman signed ceasefire agreement with Entente powers. While Ottoman government was silent, it was the new government in Ankara who pressured British to release them and they had to release the commander Fahrettin Pasha. He returned Anatolia and continued fighting against Entente powers in Turkish war of independence. It is again completely false young turks were Turkish nationalists and turkified Ottoman with liberal reforms, they were reformist conservatives and aimed to modernize Ottoman without touching its Caliphate at all. They replaced Sultan Abdulmahid because they believed his reforms weren't fundamental enough. This was why they were against Turkish revolutionaries later on, only a handful of them tried to join the new government in Ankara including Enver Pasha but they were rejected. Claiming those people were same and had same ideologies is just laughable at best, if you want to be successful do your research properly. Nobody in Ottoman regardless young turk Pashas nor ordinary Turkish soldiers had any intention to abandon Muslim lands to enemies. After Arab rebellion Turkish mindset changed and the new government in Ankara had one objective alone, liberating Turkish majority territories..
Young Turks were a Coalition of young dissidents who ended the sultanate of the Ottoman Empire. Consisting of college students and dissident soldiers, the group succeeded in 1908 in forcing Abdülhamid II to reinstitute the 1876 constitution and recall the legislature. The Young Turk era ended in 1918 with the war of independence. The subsequent Republic of Turkey inherited the political and social infrastructure of the Young Turk government. Young turks also had members in masonic logdes proving they were freemason and were clearly against Islam and had kufr in them. Young turks were clearly on kufr and fried to change islam same as how kafir government do today in non Muslim countries making them the worst of the lot.
They did left him Hejaz, they just didn't wanted to give him Syria Palestine and Iraq. Rest of Arabia didn't mattered much to to British,except Aden in yemen
And for us from estern Europe otoman empaire It was in all our history a mess for 500 hundred years, rape crime........ 😷😷😷😷and so on. Do you know the realty about your history? You Muslim you know just to play the victim. You are more than 2 billions on that earth and you continued to cry that someone else don't let you develop someone else it's to blame. Your world it's full of crime, persecution of minority in the name of your religion throughout the history your of caliphate, and Islamic world . And most of you run towards West to find freedom, and in the same time you are destroying everything are good. Way? Because 90 %of your world it's illiterate and it's easy to be brainwashed from your boss. No one in that world it's without sin. Finished complain. When you complain you show weak.
The Arabs thought they could deal with Brits (diplomatically) the same way they dealt with the Turks. They never knew how duplicitous and sociopathic the Anglosphere is; essentially protected from that reality by the Ottomans.
Every abominable hypocrite claims ancestral connection to the noble prophet. No wonder why Almighty Allah made it clear in the Qur'an that the messenger is not father to any of us.
@@Ibrahim-fh6kv So what ? Even though it was weak but it had a great influence . Empire or state that time thought twice before plotting against us . Our Ummah had a roof over head . Now look at us .
@@dyu4634nationalism was a Zionist invention... Before that you were either a Muslim, Christian, Jew, pagan... Ottomans started falling after introducing "Imperial Edict of Reorganization" in 1839 to curb nationalism but this had many flaws with moving away from sharia being the primary one... Turks themselves also succumbed to nationalism as it was spreading fast like cancer in Ottoman lands... However, to say what Arabs did was justified which is join team Zionist against Ottomans is very wrong... You don't eat your brothers flesh because you find him or yourself slowly returning to jāhilia...
The khalifa was a secular puppet ruled by the three pashas who forced turkification on Arabs and adopted western laws and abandoned sharia. History is not as simple as it seems
From the first months of the siege, Ottoman soldiers experienced serious difficulties in every aspect. Especially food and health facilities came to the point of depletion in a short time. So much so that when the garrison surrendered, the only food supplies passed to the Hashemite Army consisted of dates and dried locusts. However, despite all the negativities, garrison commander Fahrettin Pasha did not want to surrender due to the moral and spiritual values in line with the city of Medina, which is considered sacred by Muslims. Fahrettin pasha didnt surrendert even after the truce while they were still eating grasshopper
Turks betrayed the ways of caliphate for centries, all they cared about was war. Arabs shoulda never allowed them to have power without being fully arabnized, that was the arabs fault
Sharif was abandoned by the British because he appointed himself as Caliph. Sufis, who strongly fought Europeans throughout Muslim lands, along with the office of the Khalifa, have been the main opposition to imperial European rule in the East. Ibn Saud guaranteed the word Khalifa will be buried, never to return again, and his theology of a savage form of Wahhabi Islam, attacked Sufis theologically and physically. The backwardness of Wahhabism also was pleasing to the British because it justified the worldview of the savage Muslim, in contrast making European culture look more civilized. In other words, they hit the jackpot with Al Saud.
The Wahhabis were likely backed by the British, since there's no way a tiny little sect could win so much given their size. No different to American support of Al Qaeda and ISIS; they need the image of the savage muslim, so they pay for it.
There's no way the nutty Wahhabi sect could have won without Anglo support. They need the image of the barbaric Muslim, so they pay for it, and support it.
The colonialist west chose not too smart people in order to control them and if they dance out of order just a bit without compromise they easily replace them like with the Suud dynasty.
What about ethnicity superiority over others. That is what's happening here in Afghanistan, millions perished because of that. I used to think ummah could unite us all, but i was wrong.
@@Ibrahim-fh6kvand its not because of ethinicity its money If a group of people are poor evrry body will treat them as inferior and this ethinicity gets connected to those people image
There was no Turkification effort in the "Wars Era". The Turkification effort was in the republican era. 1910-11 Libyan War, 1911-13 Balkan Wars, 1914-18 Great War, 1918-1922 Independence War, brother, at this point, in this catastrophic era, nobody was trying to Turkificate anything. The ones who went to Libya, were also pashas from the government of CUP or Young Turks. CUP pashas were also pan-Islamists. But, dear muslims should understand that every human being can be proud of their fathers' accomplishments. So did they. You need to wake up to the truth, the truth is, the Islamic world was always ruled by the Turks whether they were Ottomans or not, after 900s and 1000s after the Turkic Seljuk campaign into Middle East. The first rulers of Egypt after ancient Egypt were Tulunids and Akshids in 800s and 900s, because the caliphs were racist towards Turks and other non-Arabs, even though the army of the caliph were nearly fully Turkic, even his closest guards and generals were Turkic. That's why Tulunids and Akshids revolted, not nationalism, but racism. Nationalism is not a bad thing, you can not demonize it, racism is bad, not nationalism, all the technological or scientifical developments are here thanks to ancient "nationalists" if you get what I mean, right? Patriotism, nationalism these are the sole reasons why a people accomplish legendary worldwide success and affect other peoples positively. The war is bad, but the thing is how you rule after the fog and blood of war? Mongols were demonized but just after their conquests they became muslim rulers who ruled over their people in prosperity, the Jewish convert to Islam, Rashid was the greatest historian of all times, who was he patronaged by? Ilkhanate Empire, aka the Muslim Mongols. Go read more. Let me continue from Akshids, after Akshids, in 1000s there arrived Turkic Seljuks and India there arrived Turkic Ghaznavids, India then was ruled by Muslim Turks like Tughlaks, Khiljis, etc etc until late 19th century until the Brits took control of Baburids (Turkic muslim Timurids, aka Mughals). After Seljuks, the Middle East was still under muslim Turkic control, with Turkic states like Zengids & Ayyubids, Turkic Mamluks of Egypt, and then Ottomans until 1922. Get it now? The 1400 year old Islam's 1000-1100 years were under protection and cultural influence of the Huns, aka Turks, NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH the Chinese-like looking Mongols. Mongols are the Chinese who was deeply influenced by Scythian or Hunnic culture, just like Hungarians who again was deeply influenced by the Turkic culture. The historiography today is either Sinocentric, Eurocentric that's why everybody demonizes pre-Islam or post-Islam Turks, nobody really fully understands Turks.
Turks were the last ethnic group to rise to nationalism in the Ottoman Empire. Turkish nationalism was born as a reaction against the nationalist movements of other ethnic groups. The Young Turk movement was a response to this. The empire disintegrated when ethnic groups rebelled against the Ottoman Empire with nationalist sentiments. Turkish nationalism was instrumental in the liberation of today's Turkey.
Enver Pasha was merely a Turkist, he was an Islamist pasha, just like Abdulhamid II. Read more about Enver Pasha. He made a great mistake then but in those times, even pan-Islamists were against Abdulhamid since there were many heavy propaganda efforts. Those pan-Islamists like Mehmed Akif, Riza Tevfik, later deeply regretted after the establishment of republic. Go read Riza Tevfik's "Abdülhamid" poem where he cries like "we made the greatest mistake of all times".
There is fault from arab, there is fault in ottomans, there is fault from british. People is people, they are always make mistake. Higher ranking people mistake much more severe scars then average people. Learn and do better from them. Dont betray fellow moslem. Dont involve your country in war for no reason. Never think your race better than others. And dont be kafr.
The Britons/Lawrence of Arabia promised the Arabs a big empire in the Middle East. It was a fata morgana with a splinter in the middle called Israel. And since then the Arabs burned (and are still burning).
This is not just a simple story. This is too much to tell here. But shortly those kufar splitted the Ummah because it was the only way to win from The Ottoman Caliphate, and it is still happening today. They sell Palestine too , them own brothers are dying right know. But sorry i cant say that because it is a fake british ideology where they believing in.
My country Turkiye has many times proposed that we muslims establish a peace keeping force and have our selves established in bases in Jordan and the region, but Arab countries have so far succummed to foreign pressures and not accepted such an offer, as yet. To all the Arab brothers and sisters; without falling out of Islamic etiquitte and manners, and without endangering yourselves or others, please rally your leaders/governments, so we can get together and do what's needed to stop all this, ...condemnation, throwing an aid pallet or two from airplanes and posing for the cameras for the media isn't right, we need to establish a peace keeping force to stop the brutality. We need to show a steady force, we need to first unite, please don't just watch, be active in your countries.... ....and all nations can join in on this peace keeping force, from all corners of the world, all beliefs, because this is about SANITY against INSANITY
EVERYONE please make a playlist about Palestine like I have (4th playlist) and ask others to have such a playlist. Or copy directly the list I have and ask others to copy it from you, and they ask others copy from them. We need to spread the truth, millions, billions of us.
As a Turkish nationalist, I sometimes think this; A state like the United Kingdom should have been formed with Türkiye, Syria and Iraq.Because, as far as I know, the Arabs living in these regions did not participate in the Arab revolts.
No. There shouldn’t have been any division in the first place. Nationalism sucks. And it’s because of nationalists that we lost our honour. A nation is nothing without its faith.
Selam to all my brothers and sisters. I hope at least we here can commit to learning from the mistakes of history and stop peddling petty tribalism or dry nationalism. There are excellent people and unfortunately toxic people (particularly among our current leaders) in all the countries of the Muslim world but we are one Ummah. We have to put our petty differences aside and act with one mind and body. This is what our enemies fear most and have been working so hard to prevent since the collapse of the caliphate. The absence if this is the situation we see today. Kings in lofty palaces worried about their self interest as our brothers and sisters in Gaza get massacred without mercy. United we have a chance to attain peace under the shadow of our joint swords. Divided we are nothing and not worthy of the legacy of the great people who came before us
Hussein bin Ali might have the best intentions, but being sides with British to revolt fellow-religionists is never a good idea. British have used him to divide Syria, and Iraq, and Hijazz, and after he is done doing it, he was just kicked out to be replaced by a worse version of him. I wonder how his time at thie exile went by.
2 things that should have happened. 1st: sultan Abdul Hamid II should quashed the the Young Turks rebellion. Which was European and atheistic in its essence. That way there was no betrayal within the sultanate itself. 2nd: The Sharif should have never betrayed the ummah by aligning with the British. The British did not want the continuation of the caliphate.
After Sultan Abdulhamid, the Ottoman administration was in the hands of pashas who were under European influence at that time. They tried to implement Turkish nationalism in some Arab geography. Like Cemal Pasha in Syria. However, when Yavuz Sultan Selim conquered Egypt, one of his pashas said, "We took Egypt from the Circassians and gave it to the Circassians again." Yavuz Sultan Selim executed that pasha. Because he was causing mischief of nationalism. With love to all my Muslim brothers from Turkey. Nationalism is a fitnah that divides the ummah. Let's be alert.
first of all the young turks did not dethrone the sultan it was ittihad terraki with enver pasha as leader, secons they did not want turkification they wanted to unite all turksto fight the oppressors and make a unified turkic islamic nation with emphasis on islamic, third you religious people who follow everything blindly should stop talking turkish history you know nothing but propaganda
they are young turks. there is not even single turk with in them but the brand name is young turks and İtthiadcı is just with different brand name for the same lobby. they had no relation to islam whatsoever. their founding members are freemasons. and they were western tools openly and publically. they are an embarrassment. today they live their lives as "chp zihniyeti" and think they are gonna be rich when they get into EU and tries to turn country into Ukraine.
What wrong with religious people? The very reason Allah SWT willed the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire is because it went further and further away from its Islamic principles.
The question is should the ottoman empire under the control of a freemason named mustafa kamal attaturk who gave jews the permission to settle in palestine be considered the ottoman empire? I think it was the zionist puppet republic of turkey disguised under the name of the ottoman empire... Ottoman empire died way back in 1909 after mustafa kamal attaturk organised a military coup against the last real ottoman sultan abdul hamid R.A. so the arabs didn't revolt against the ottomans they revolted against the zionist puppet attaturk who did everything in his power to erase islam from turkey...
ingilizlerle birlik olup osmanlıya karşı isyan edip savaşan araplarda suç yok öyle mi? o senin yerlere göklere sığdıramadığın abdülhamid osmanlı topraklarının yarısından fazlasını sarayında otururken verdi. Sarayından çıkmadı bile. O küfür ettiğin atatürk cepheden cepheye koştu. bunları neden söylemiyorsun? İşiniz günüz yalan dolan.
As a Muslim Turk, I would like to say that the Ottoman Empire became very corrupt during this man's time, during the nationalism movement and the tanzimat period. Look at the man called Mahmud II, for example, he was the one who made wearing a fez a law (obligation) and introduced some secular systems into the state. In our opinion, he was the ‘Gavur Padishah’. Gavur means infidel. During the reign of Abdulhamid II, he was often subjected to fitna due to parasites within the state. When these parasites brought him down, they brought the old sultan, who did not understand the state affairs, to power and destroyed the state by putting the state into the 1st world war. Remember this; the reason for this man's rebellion may have been unjust, but the British were not so simple, they broke their promises against the possibility that this man would increase his relations with Turkey, which was the continuation of the Ottoman Empire after the war, and placed the ancestor of the House of Saud. For example, Gertrude Bell was the one who destroyed the Ottoman Empire, she created more than 20 countries out of the caliphate, she was the teacher of Lawrence of Arabia. Whenever she entered Muslim lands, she would cover herself and speak as if she was one of them. Lawrence has a saying: ‘I was so carried away that sometimes I was praying evening prayers when no one was there.' Do you see the hypocrites? For me, the most vivid story is the story of Abdulhamid. He is a paranoid man (as it is), he does not trust anyone around him (parasites), but one day he learns about a man in a town who has knowledge of hundreds of hadiths and has lived there for years. After testing him, he calls him to him one night and the man he brought in describes it like this; ‘’The sultan called me to him and I hurriedly went to him. when they took me to the palace, he was on the balcony, his back was turned to me, he turned to me and showed me a list ‘’the list of agents he had exposed‘’, he counted the names of each of them, I waited for my name, he hugged me and said words expressing his trust, he poured his tears on my shoulder. when he finished counting names in the list, I understood that the sultan couldn't have exposed me‘’ Arminius Vambery (British Spy) And the sultan unfortunetly give him the most mahram(private) information of the state. Our saddest and weakest period indeed... If you look at the wars of the last century and mark them, you will see that you have drawn the borders of the last caliphate, that is, the Ottoman Empire.
I don't care who's right or wrong one thing is for sure we've lost our honor and security since the last khilafa... Please Muslims lets bring it back in some shape or form
In fact, the Turkification didn't alienate the Arabs. It is just the other way around. The alienation of the Balkan People killed the idea of Ottomanizm first, giving way to rise of Islamizim. Then the alienation of the Arabs killed the idea of Islamizim and gived way to Turkification. That was the only ideology left, to save the independence of the state, leaning on the turkish population and to focus saving the turkish majority lands, which is called "Misak-i Milli". As Mustafa Kemal Pasha back then stated: "Turkish boys will not die for the Arabian deserts anymore."
Beethoven was a satanist, as were many major musicians. It's not a "baba" who spoke against musical instruments, it's even referred to by the oldest scholars in the Tafseer of Surah Luqman, and there are several authentic Hadith of our beloved Prophet (peace be upon him) himself, directly shedding light on the issue. But the lack of civility in your response to a polite question speaks volumes.
One clear and known fact is that whenever a question or a personal thought is written as a headline in a newspaper or a youtube video (as of now and here). The answer is no and not. Dear gentlemen the Sherifs of Makkah are friends of Ottomans and not subjects, so there are no treason in this situation, and afterall the only one was open for realtions with the Ottomans is the wise Sherif Hussain, Hijaz state is considered a special state that is not controled by the Ottomans and never and if there was treasons of Ottomans go look who are the traitors from their subjects not the Sherifs. The Sherifate of Makkah is a higher rank than any rank more the Sultan and they knew it. Read history and understand the facts before posting here and there and before all respect yourself as the land will not respect your rotten body when you will be buried under it.
Should I like and help the Arab countries people that betrayed my ancestors back then even tho there's many sahih Hadith about 2 muslims fighting each other etc? Im not a nationalist but after watching this I honestly like Arabs way less than I already used to.
The average Arab is not your enemy. The average Muslim, Arab or non-Arab, is your brother. Remember what the Prophet (SAW) said in his last sermon. Not an Arab over a non-Arab or a non-Arab over an Arab. It might feel hard sometimes, but avoid being racist. The main leaders may be silent but there are many, many Arabs sacrificing their money and lives for p@les.tine right now. The actions of their traitorous ancestors are not on their hands. May Allah help unite all the Muslims. We need unity now. The tides are turning. We have to grab this wave that the Arab p@les.tinians are sacrificing their lives for, partly to open our eyes and realize that coming back to Islam is the only solution. And coming back to Islam means abandoning racism. Don't become the monster you fight.
@@MiaMaraa you missed the point. Hasan son of Ali reign for 6 months before he gave up for Umayyad. the Sharifate of mecca are supposed descendent of Hassan. Sharif Hussein, after the fall of Ottoman Caliphate, he declared new Caliphate in Mecca but he last a Caliph for 6 months because of Saudi attacks and war..
@@Era_Of_Awakeningwhy dont you guys understand Hussein and this and that Doesnt matter Ummah did it was supossed To hell with this hussein and hassan We are here now becaue of all that stupid infighitng for two losrs who got their heads cut off and no hassan and hussein are not any prohphet so they cant be considered religious figure They are historical figure So dont try make your own cult on based this two losers
We must say one thing about the YoungTurks…The head of them Enver Pasha was a pro islamist but the process pushed him to Turkic ideology…Turcification didnt emerge abruptly…it came as opposed to armenian and different balcan ethnic groups’ revolts that bring about many killings of civillian Turks in the villages by these groups…
And that's how this man ensured the decline of Ottoman empire and have a lasting effect on the Muslim Ummah. Since this was the watershed moment that ultimately led to the unending problems of the Middle East
Casts created in islam by english peoples so muslims keep fighting each other, in my country every cast of islam says that other is wrong Hence divide ande rule
@@ImpregnableIslam dont know why it wasnt showing anyway, wahabi is like a cast of islam in which people follow a specific imam. There are different types like wahbi, sunni , shia etc There casts was created so muslims keep fighting each others Hence divide and rule
Nice, it’s good to know that in the same way that Zionists have lost their memories past October 7th, the Muslims have lost their memories past 1948. Let’s always remember that nationalism is the reason of all the trouble in the Middle East, not the West!
Ottoman empire was dead anyway. Since 18th century, it was bad. They declared themselves as caliphate, but in reality, ordinary monarchy, which was super power until 1700s.
There are multiple errors in your video. First of all, turkification was only applied in the region called Anatolia. The Ottomans did not interfere with the internal affairs of the Arabian Peninsula, they only appointed governors, collected taxes and requested soldiers during jihad. And the seeking for independence & uprisings in the Balkans were long before the coup of the Young Turks and were generally supported by Russia. For example, Greece declared its independence long before the Young Turks. The Ottoman Empire lost a lot of blood in the Balkans and Europe in the last century. After the French revolution, every nation in the Balkans began to revolt. The Ottomans lost many martyrs to suppress the rebellions. Essentially, the Young Turks were aware that the empire was deteriorating and they could not stop the disintegration, so they had no choice but turkification to protect Anatolia, where a large part of the population was Turkish, against such uprisings. This includes the Armenian deportation. Because Armenian gangs raided many Turkish villages in Eastern Anatolia and massacred the Turks, many mass graves belonging to the Turks were found. At that moment there was no choice other than turkification. Then the Ottoman Empire entered the First World War and became even weaker. Many Turkish soldiers were martyred to suppress the British-backed Arab uprising. Don't forget Fahreddin Pasha, who endured the siege with his soldiers, hungry and thirsty, to protect the holy lands. After all, there has been no peace in the Balkans or the Middle East for years!
I don't think the revolt was unjustified. I think his cooperation with the imperialists is what made him the villain. "Let's throw away our shackles with the help of the imperialist" yeah that never happened.
He was decieved to betray the ottomans offered a poisoned sweet to blemish his credibility,well history has judged him already may Allah forgive and mercy on his soul after all he was just a human bound by weakness and flaws.
Its not that simple to cover this topic but alot of research is needed ataturk isn't turkish but was a jew and his betrayal in Palestine battle field was result of so much land loss and all but countless others where all placed in ottoman army and this is a major issue that needs to be address
Ottoman lost its grace when they started following the Europeans. It was Khalifate in name. The literally adopted their constitution from the Napoleonic Code in 1858 not from Sharia.
Muslim ruler?who? The last Muslim ruler was Abdulhamid who was overthrown in 1908. After that,ottoman state was ruled by a westernised YounG Turk kids who thought they could reform the empire but failed. There's a reason why Armenians,Kurds Arabs all rebelled
Biggest mistake the Ottoma's did back then is not to convert all regions they conquered in Europe to the islam. Pretty sure we would have a different outcome and even history today if things would have went that way. Unfortunately the brits and europeans like the french took over controll especially in the middle east and influenced loads of culture and behavior. It is how it is and we cant change it but still tey to make the world a better place
By that logic, ottomans would have fallen even more quickly. They survived by treating minorities good. The first Ruler Osman was known for his good treatment of Christians
In the end, it's all about power & when SATAN deceives those who want power & the ALMIGHTY gives power to whom HE wants. No one should blame anyone for someones else's wrong doings. The core matter is we the UMMAH have been defeated & we were collectively very far from islam then & now. " NOTHING HAPPENS WITHOUT a PURPOSE. Nothing . Not even pain. That broken heart & that pain are lessons & signs for us. They are warnings that something is wrong. They are WARNINGS THAT WE NEED TO MAKE A CHANGE." Taken from a sister's words ' Yasmin Mogahed'
We're a small but dedicated team on a mission to provide free access to educational content. If you find our content valuable, please support us by subscribing, liking, and sharing our videos. Your engagement makes all the difference!
Young Turks were Donmeh. These were Jews or Crypto Jews who pretended to be Muslims converted but they didn’t convert. These Donmeh installed Arabs Jews to rule Gulf countries.
The Ottoman were compromised. Majority of their leaders were Donmeh.
Exactly 💯
It's excellent to be part of the team 👏
Please support us 🙏 by following 🙏
If your rebellion is supported by Brits, it is not your rebellion anymore. You are a mere puppet in their play…
Lol and the turks were supported by the germans
And if the other side is supported by the brits and germans and etc, then it is not a side to call any act against a rebel. Writing before reading is funny isn't it?!
@@Sharifammarofmakkah what do you mean by the other side is supported by british? Brits have devastated the ottoman empire
They also devastated the arabs @emiryalcn8922
@@emiryalcn8922 True, all for oil.
He didn’t just betray the ottomans. But the entire Ummah!
Turks treated them like third class citizens
@@mr.o8539 total bullshit, we send trains full of gold to hejaz every fking year, we didnt touch their language, their culture, all we told them was, we are brothers, but they went with nationalism and took away al quds from the entire ummah by betraying the khalifa, so dont come up here with your third class citizen bullshit, we treated you as equals or even better then the Turks in anatolia, and you guys behaved like total animals towards us
@@mr.o8539 you brainwashed
@@mr.o8539 where? Did we change your language? Did we change your culture? Did we force you to do things you didn't want? Now you are not governed by the Turks and you live as first class citizens in Syria, Iraq and Palestine. Congratulations
@@pricemavili9006 🫡 reply was awesome 👌
and since then we see the results today
Nationalism is the great curse of our Ummah
@@Wailky2008 you can keep your Ummah. Turks aren’t part of that pan-Arabian fantasy.
@@Wailky2008 tell that to young turks at that time, and now.
The Ottoman Empire was a colonial power. It was the successor of the Roman Empire. The Ottomans made Arabs and Muslim youth fight and die for themselves, used those lands to collect taxes, but in return did not make any investments in those lands and those lands remained undeveloped. The Ottoman Empire turned its back on the Arabs and face to the West. It had Arab intellectuals killed so that they would not criticize the corrupt administration of the Empire, which had fallen into pleasure, debauchery and waste. When the Ottoman Empire had just arrived, the Arab geography was experiencing its golden age. It was ahead of its time in subjects such as Ethics, Science, Medicine, Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Geometry and enlightened Europe. However, the Ottomans misused this wealth and development and spent this power on pleasure with women in the palace. Using this power, the Ottomans bridged the sectarian differences among Muslims and took the Middle East behind the times, just like America does today. During the Ottoman period, CEOs had a privileged place in the administration. Today, if Islam is associated with terrorism and underdevelopment, the Ottoman Empire is most responsible for this. Arabs and Muslims gave power to the Ottoman Empire and a great responsibility fell to the Ottoman Empire, but the Ottoman Empire abused this power and misrepresented Islam. If we are in this situation today, it is not the fault of the Palestinians, but the fault of those who shirk their responsibility. Stop using the CEOnists' propaganda of blaming the Palestinians for everything.
As an Arab I agree, However Ottomans in the that time were not implementing shariah and overthro the Sultan rule and accepted western ideologies, so Islamically they have no rights to hold our lands until they implement Shariah and rule by Islam and throw all western ideologies out.
Palestinian blood is on his hands...
no is not justmind your own shit
Not really
Yes.. agree. What happened now in Palestine is one of his betrayal effect. Shame!
@@joahua122sound personal
@@joahua122wahhabi dog
His betrayal only harmed his own Arab brethren to this day
Turks betrayed the ways of caliphate for centries, all they cared about was war. Arabs shoulda never allowed them to have power without being fully arabnized, that was the arabs fault
Turks betrayed the arabs by trying to make them fight the 3 biggest empires in the world at the time
How?
@@bo6be3 how what?
@@bo6be3 every trouble in the Middle East due to this betrayal if this didn’t happened ME would’ve been more stable and prosperous
And his three sons became the kings of Jordan, Syria and Iraq. Current kings/rulers of these 3 countries are descendants of him, the great traitor.
and his sons are traitors too. apple never fell far from the tree
@@BOZ_11Nah king Faisal of Iraq is goated
Well they are out of Iraq and Syria only Jordan left to go
@@nadeemahmed6596 Yeah if I'm not entirely mistaken, Syria was gone in 1920, Iraq was gone in the 1950s and Jordan is up next(they're already screwed rn)
Greetings from Algeria to Turkey, I hope one day i can visit the tomb of our first king, Barbaros Hayreddin Pasha
Greeting my brother. I am a Turk and we love him with all our hearts. He had the heart of a lion. He served his Caliph and the Ummah with Honour. He is at peace in the lands of a brother country. I wish to send my gratitude to you, your beautify country and your wonderful people. Selam Aleyküm my brother 🇹🇷❤️🇩🇿
His tomb is in Istanbul, Besiktas and was personally made by another legend Mimar Sinan in 1541 and from that day till this day, whenever an Ottoman or Turkish navy vessel goes on a mission. They first visit the Tomb of Barbaros Hayrettin pasha and perform a ÇİMARİVA greeting. (all soldiers stands next to each other side by side on the deck and salute his tomb)
You can see this greeting in the video below, although the quality is very poor.
th-cam.com/video/QYUm428I3_c/w-d-xo.html
@@Isra-hl4jx thank you very much for your kind words brother. Oruç his brother is buried here. Turkey is a sister country for us. And the Ottoman sultans called our country “house of Djihâd” thanks to barbaros Pasha and his successors who made our country’s name so feared and respected. So I hope I can one day visit his tomb and kiss the green flag.
🐺🇩🇿🤝🇹🇷🐺
He is not a king but vassal of Turkish Empire, may he rest in peace
He was played by the brits and the French. It doesn’t get simpler than this.
And the turks were played by the germans
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0and the British
Ww1 was to dismantle the khilafat system
@@crispusallen3865 lol ottomans were irrelevant
@@crispusallen3865 originally it was to tackle the threat of german empire. But then they "improvised" seeing that the ottoman empire jump into the war.
Turkification was only instituted in the Anatolian Provinces of the Empire. Syrian, Hejazi and Iraqi Vilayets were not subjected to Turkification.
Keep buying these lies.
@@nathanielmartins5930 He is telling the truth, why did you write this ridiculous answer??
@@alparslanerylmaz
Because what he said is plain and simply false.
@@nathanielmartins5930The only explanation is that your great-grandfathers made up this fact because it was against their own interests.
@@nathanielmartins5930max euro
This content is one of the most important topics but unfortunately completely underrated.
Turkish garrison of Medina didn't surrender to Hussein bin Ali, in fact they didn't even surrender when WW1 ended! They surrendered at 10 January 1919, 3 months after than Ottoman signed ceasefire agreement with Entente powers. While Ottoman government was silent, it was the new government in Ankara who pressured British to release them and they had to release the commander Fahrettin Pasha. He returned Anatolia and continued fighting against Entente powers in Turkish war of independence.
It is again completely false young turks were Turkish nationalists and turkified Ottoman with liberal reforms, they were reformist conservatives and aimed to modernize Ottoman without touching its Caliphate at all. They replaced Sultan Abdulmahid because they believed his reforms weren't fundamental enough. This was why they were against Turkish revolutionaries later on, only a handful of them tried to join the new government in Ankara including Enver Pasha but they were rejected. Claiming those people were same and had same ideologies is just laughable at best, if you want to be successful do your research properly. Nobody in Ottoman regardless young turk Pashas nor ordinary Turkish soldiers had any intention to abandon Muslim lands to enemies. After Arab rebellion Turkish mindset changed and the new government in Ankara had one objective alone, liberating Turkish majority territories..
Young Turks were a Coalition of young dissidents who ended the sultanate of the Ottoman Empire. Consisting of college students and dissident soldiers, the group succeeded in 1908 in forcing Abdülhamid II to reinstitute the 1876 constitution and recall the legislature. The Young Turk era ended in 1918 with the war of independence. The subsequent Republic of Turkey inherited the political and social infrastructure of the Young Turk government. Young turks also had members in masonic logdes proving they were freemason and were clearly against Islam and had kufr in them. Young turks were clearly on kufr and fried to change islam same as how kafir government do today in non Muslim countries making them the worst of the lot.
@@abdullahassaffah We Turks have no problem with the Young Turks, we love and respect them very much.
@@enessanadine1 Dont talk behalf of all Turks
@@mostafamchet7733 which one should i believe. were the young turks on the side of islam and the caliphate or not. what do you believe brother?
@@mostafamchet7733 Those who do not respect the Young Turks are not ''Turks'' in the first place, so I cannot speak on their behalf. Don't worry
Hussein Bin Ali: I want to be a king
🇬🇧: what a nice idea, we support you
Hussein Bein Ali: I succeeded
🇬🇧: very well, your time is up
They did left him Hejaz, they just didn't wanted to give him Syria Palestine and Iraq. Rest of Arabia didn't mattered much to to British,except Aden in yemen
The British/colonialism are the core of all problems in history.
And for us from estern Europe otoman empaire It was in all our history a mess for 500 hundred years, rape crime........ 😷😷😷😷and so on. Do you know the realty about your history? You Muslim you know just to play the victim. You are more than 2 billions on that earth and you continued to cry that someone else don't let you develop someone else it's to blame. Your world it's full of crime, persecution of minority in the name of your religion throughout the history your of caliphate, and Islamic world . And most of you run towards West to find freedom, and in the same time you are destroying everything are good. Way? Because 90 %of your world it's illiterate and it's easy to be brainwashed from your boss. No one in that world it's without sin. Finished complain. When you complain you show weak.
The Arabs thought they could deal with Brits (diplomatically) the same way they dealt with the Turks. They never knew how duplicitous and sociopathic the Anglosphere is; essentially protected from that reality by the Ottomans.
A traitor.
I feel sorry for the Turkish youngs who gave their lives to maintain order in that desert.
Ayidan post araptan dost olmaz
yea i feel bad for the poor arabs who were forced to add innovations to islam
Ayidan post araptan dost olmaz
@@EdwardFishington says the one who calls himself edward, change your name first back to normal before you start talking about innovations
@@alperenbaytimur oh no a name i made almost 2 years ago what ever will i do ?
Every abominable hypocrite claims ancestral connection to the noble prophet. No wonder why Almighty Allah made it clear in the Qur'an that the messenger is not father to any of us.
From his daughter and Ali
Absolutely Nothing justifies going against khilafah .
The khilafah was already weak since late 1600s
@@Ibrahim-fh6kv So what ? Even though it was weak but it had a great influence . Empire or state that time thought twice before plotting against us . Our Ummah had a roof over head . Now look at us .
@@dyu4634nationalism was a Zionist invention... Before that you were either a Muslim, Christian, Jew, pagan...
Ottomans started falling after introducing "Imperial Edict of Reorganization" in 1839 to curb nationalism but this had many flaws with moving away from sharia being the primary one... Turks themselves also succumbed to nationalism as it was spreading fast like cancer in Ottoman lands... However, to say what Arabs did was justified which is join team Zionist against Ottomans is very wrong... You don't eat your brothers flesh because you find him or yourself slowly returning to jāhilia...
The khalifa was a secular puppet ruled by the three pashas who forced turkification on Arabs and adopted western laws and abandoned sharia. History is not as simple as it seems
They are not Arabs they cant be a khilafah
From the first months of the siege, Ottoman soldiers experienced serious difficulties in every aspect. Especially food and health facilities came to the point of depletion in a short time. So much so that when the garrison surrendered, the only food supplies passed to the Hashemite Army consisted of dates and dried locusts. However, despite all the negativities, garrison commander Fahrettin Pasha did not want to surrender due to the moral and spiritual values in line with the city of Medina, which is considered sacred by Muslims.
Fahrettin pasha didnt surrendert even after the truce while they were still eating grasshopper
Brave men. They all were, may they rest in peace.
He was a traitor 🤮
Turks betrayed the ways of caliphate for centries, all they cared about was war. Arabs shoulda never allowed them to have power without being fully arabnized, that was the arabs fault
Lol turkeys fault for choosing to war with the 3 biggest empires in the world
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0you think they wouldnt attack turks
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 Of course you support the Irgun
@@user-us7el6ss2l no. It's just pretty.
I used to have a hakenkreuz
Sharif was abandoned by the British because he appointed himself as Caliph. Sufis, who strongly fought Europeans throughout Muslim lands, along with the office of the Khalifa, have been the main opposition to imperial European rule in the East. Ibn Saud guaranteed the word Khalifa will be buried, never to return again, and his theology of a savage form of Wahhabi Islam, attacked Sufis theologically and physically. The backwardness of Wahhabism also was pleasing to the British because it justified the worldview of the savage Muslim, in contrast making European culture look more civilized. In other words, they hit the jackpot with Al Saud.
Strong and on point words.
The Wahhabis were likely backed by the British, since there's no way a tiny little sect could win so much given their size. No different to American support of Al Qaeda and ISIS; they need the image of the savage muslim, so they pay for it.
Ottomans werent sufis. That is wahabi propaganda.
There's no way the nutty Wahhabi sect could have won without Anglo support. They need the image of the barbaric Muslim, so they pay for it, and support it.
Gtfo, you didnt know anyshit. Keep believing this wahabi nonsense. Wahabism is created by the britisch spy hempher.
He was far from being smart he got himself just used..
The colonialist west chose not too smart people in order to control them and if they dance out of order just a bit without compromise they easily replace them like with the Suud dynasty.
Still muslims counting and witnesses the cost of betrayal
what cost of it? arabs having a country after a hundred years getting killed?
The situation was the same that day and same today. Only thing changed is the existence of Israel,which is due to WORLD WAR2 ,not one
Betraying a Muslim in favor on a non-Muslim is not justified.
That's what turks did with germany
Nationalism is the greatest sedition inflicted on this ummah.
What about ethnicity superiority over others. That is what's happening here in Afghanistan, millions perished because of that. I used to think ummah could unite us all, but i was wrong.
@@Ibrahim-fh6kvand its not because of ethinicity its money
If a group of people are poor evrry body will treat them as inferior and this ethinicity gets connected to those people image
@@Ibrahim-fh6kv Afghanistan's plight is administered by the Americans
Greed too
@@BOZ_11 It was long screwed, The Soviet invasion triggered it
There was no Turkification effort in the "Wars Era". The Turkification effort was in the republican era. 1910-11 Libyan War, 1911-13 Balkan Wars, 1914-18 Great War, 1918-1922 Independence War, brother, at this point, in this catastrophic era, nobody was trying to Turkificate anything. The ones who went to Libya, were also pashas from the government of CUP or Young Turks. CUP pashas were also pan-Islamists. But, dear muslims should understand that every human being can be proud of their fathers' accomplishments. So did they. You need to wake up to the truth, the truth is, the Islamic world was always ruled by the Turks whether they were Ottomans or not, after 900s and 1000s after the Turkic Seljuk campaign into Middle East. The first rulers of Egypt after ancient Egypt were Tulunids and Akshids in 800s and 900s, because the caliphs were racist towards Turks and other non-Arabs, even though the army of the caliph were nearly fully Turkic, even his closest guards and generals were Turkic. That's why Tulunids and Akshids revolted, not nationalism, but racism. Nationalism is not a bad thing, you can not demonize it, racism is bad, not nationalism, all the technological or scientifical developments are here thanks to ancient "nationalists" if you get what I mean, right? Patriotism, nationalism these are the sole reasons why a people accomplish legendary worldwide success and affect other peoples positively. The war is bad, but the thing is how you rule after the fog and blood of war? Mongols were demonized but just after their conquests they became muslim rulers who ruled over their people in prosperity, the Jewish convert to Islam, Rashid was the greatest historian of all times, who was he patronaged by? Ilkhanate Empire, aka the Muslim Mongols. Go read more. Let me continue from Akshids, after Akshids, in 1000s there arrived Turkic Seljuks and India there arrived Turkic Ghaznavids, India then was ruled by Muslim Turks like Tughlaks, Khiljis, etc etc until late 19th century until the Brits took control of Baburids (Turkic muslim Timurids, aka Mughals). After Seljuks, the Middle East was still under muslim Turkic control, with Turkic states like Zengids & Ayyubids, Turkic Mamluks of Egypt, and then Ottomans until 1922. Get it now? The 1400 year old Islam's 1000-1100 years were under protection and cultural influence of the Huns, aka Turks, NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH the Chinese-like looking Mongols. Mongols are the Chinese who was deeply influenced by Scythian or Hunnic culture, just like Hungarians who again was deeply influenced by the Turkic culture. The historiography today is either Sinocentric, Eurocentric that's why everybody demonizes pre-Islam or post-Islam Turks, nobody really fully understands Turks.
Ah I forgot Iran. Iran was also under muslim Turkic rule until 1925, until the British-made, British-provoked, British-supported Pahlavi Coup in 1925.
Today his great great grandson is the king of Jordan.
Jordan used their air defences recently to protect Israel from the Iranian missile/drone attack. The biggest joke of a country
long live the king
@@joahua122 🤮🤮🤮
yes, the man who helped israel's air defence 🤷♂🤷♂🤣🤣
@@BOZ_11 He’s a sellout.
That is my fav, thanks again for always enlightening us 👏👏👏👏👏👏
Turks were the last ethnic group to rise to nationalism in the Ottoman Empire. Turkish nationalism was born as a reaction against the nationalist movements of other ethnic groups. The Young Turk movement was a response to this. The empire disintegrated when ethnic groups rebelled against the Ottoman Empire with nationalist sentiments. Turkish nationalism was instrumental in the liberation of today's Turkey.
I would disagree. Turkic elites were already adopting western ideas by that time
Enver Pasha was merely a Turkist, he was an Islamist pasha, just like Abdulhamid II. Read more about Enver Pasha. He made a great mistake then but in those times, even pan-Islamists were against Abdulhamid since there were many heavy propaganda efforts. Those pan-Islamists like Mehmed Akif, Riza Tevfik, later deeply regretted after the establishment of republic. Go read Riza Tevfik's "Abdülhamid" poem where he cries like "we made the greatest mistake of all times".
There is fault from arab, there is fault in ottomans, there is fault from british. People is people, they are always make mistake. Higher ranking people mistake much more severe scars then average people. Learn and do better from them. Dont betray fellow moslem. Dont involve your country in war for no reason. Never think your race better than others. And dont be kafr.
my guy thought he could trust the british
Turkish nationalism is the latest,,,,greece,,balkan Armenian arab nationalism triggered tge turkish nationalism
The Britons/Lawrence of Arabia promised the Arabs a big empire in the Middle East. It was a fata morgana with a splinter in the middle called Israel. And since then the Arabs burned (and are still burning).
This is not just a simple story. This is too much to tell here. But shortly those kufar splitted the Ummah because it was the only way to win from The Ottoman Caliphate, and it is still happening today. They sell Palestine too , them own brothers are dying right know. But sorry i cant say that because it is a fake british ideology where they believing in.
My country Turkiye has many times proposed that we muslims establish a peace keeping force and have our selves established in bases in Jordan and the region, but Arab countries have so far succummed to foreign pressures and not accepted such an offer, as yet.
To all the Arab brothers and sisters; without falling out of Islamic etiquitte and manners, and without endangering yourselves or others, please rally your leaders/governments, so we can get together and do what's needed to stop all this,
...condemnation, throwing an aid pallet or two from airplanes and posing for the cameras for the media isn't right, we need to establish a peace keeping force to stop the brutality.
We need to show a steady force, we need to first unite, please don't just watch, be active in your countries....
....and all nations can join in on this peace keeping force, from all corners of the world, all beliefs,
because this is about SANITY against INSANITY
EVERYONE please make a playlist about Palestine like I have (4th playlist) and ask others to have such a playlist.
Or copy directly the list I have and ask others to copy it from you, and they ask others copy from them.
We need to spread the truth, millions, billions of us.
Turkey Is A Secular Country Aiding NATO. You're All The Same...
rally our leaders? our leaders are too busy killing us and if we so much as breathe they send us behind the moon...
As a Turkish nationalist, I sometimes think this; A state like the United Kingdom should have been formed with Türkiye, Syria and Iraq.Because, as far as I know, the Arabs living in these regions did not participate in the Arab revolts.
owww, dont say that "arabs, revolted, backstabbed us". niye böyle şeyleri sürekli söyleyip duruyorlar ağ. hele ki hele şuan gazzede soykırım varken ?
No. There shouldn’t have been any division in the first place. Nationalism sucks. And it’s because of nationalists that we lost our honour. A nation is nothing without its faith.
I am Turkish too. Turks gained a lot of honor with Islam. We need to help all the Muslims.
The revolt is actually the fault of your kind; nationalists
@@Dem1DerTell that to arab nationalists 😂
The worst betrayal in human history, so much so that the consequences are still present to this day mainly in Gaza.
That's because of WW2,not one
Can you imagine what sin he commited!?!
What about the Saudi family, they betrayed too and stayed loyal to their British puppet
That nomad was harami
Selam to all my brothers and sisters. I hope at least we here can commit to learning from the mistakes of history and stop peddling petty tribalism or dry nationalism. There are excellent people and unfortunately toxic people (particularly among our current leaders) in all the countries of the Muslim world but we are one Ummah. We have to put our petty differences aside and act with one mind and body. This is what our enemies fear most and have been working so hard to prevent since the collapse of the caliphate. The absence if this is the situation we see today. Kings in lofty palaces worried about their self interest as our brothers and sisters in Gaza get massacred without mercy. United we have a chance to attain peace under the shadow of our joint swords. Divided we are nothing and not worthy of the legacy of the great people who came before us
tears and bloodshed ever since..
Hussein bin Ali might have the best intentions, but being sides with British to revolt fellow-religionists is never a good idea. British have used him to divide Syria, and Iraq, and Hijazz, and after he is done doing it, he was just kicked out to be replaced by a worse version of him. I wonder how his time at thie exile went by.
This is fantastic work❤
Glad you think so!
The ottomans never fought against arabs. They left arabs to their devises.
The prophet Muhammad pbuh said .. nationalism is not in Islam.... this was the start and this is why we are so divided today....
This was really good, Very short and concise.
I'm sure hours could be made on causes and strategies and allegiances that took place.
2 things that should have happened.
1st: sultan Abdul Hamid II should quashed the the Young Turks rebellion. Which was European and atheistic in its essence. That way there was no betrayal within the sultanate itself.
2nd: The Sharif should have never betrayed the ummah by aligning with the British. The British did not want the continuation of the caliphate.
great episode
your videos are amazing man
Great video
Now see what they got out of it.
After Sultan Abdulhamid, the Ottoman administration was in the hands of pashas who were under European influence at that time. They tried to implement Turkish nationalism in some Arab geography. Like Cemal Pasha in Syria. However, when Yavuz Sultan Selim conquered Egypt, one of his pashas said, "We took Egypt from the Circassians and gave it to the Circassians again." Yavuz Sultan Selim executed that pasha. Because he was causing mischief of nationalism. With love to all my Muslim brothers from Turkey. Nationalism is a fitnah that divides the ummah. Let's be alert.
first of all the young turks did not dethrone the sultan it was ittihad terraki with enver pasha as leader, secons they did not want turkification they wanted to unite all turksto fight the oppressors and make a unified turkic islamic nation with emphasis on islamic, third you religious people who follow everything blindly should stop talking turkish history you know nothing but propaganda
they are young turks. there is not even single turk with in them but the brand name is young turks and İtthiadcı is just with different brand name for the same lobby. they had no relation to islam whatsoever. their founding members are freemasons. and they were western tools openly and publically. they are an embarrassment. today they live their lives as "chp zihniyeti" and think they are gonna be rich when they get into EU and tries to turn country into Ukraine.
What wrong with religious people? The very reason Allah SWT willed the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire is because it went further and further away from its Islamic principles.
@@Dem1Der you are deflecting your own fault to allah now ?
@@kizgintosbaga No. It is the fault of the Muslim’s straying away from Islam that caused the downfall of the empire.
Learn history not brainwash propaganda,,,they let Portuguese and French troops in that slaughtered people in villages
How unfortunate is a person who hails from prophets family and then betrayed whole ummah
The question is should the ottoman empire under the control of a freemason named mustafa kamal attaturk who gave jews the permission to settle in palestine be considered the ottoman empire? I think it was the zionist puppet republic of turkey disguised under the name of the ottoman empire... Ottoman empire died way back in 1909 after mustafa kamal attaturk organised a military coup against the last real ottoman sultan abdul hamid R.A. so the arabs didn't revolt against the ottomans they revolted against the zionist puppet attaturk who did everything in his power to erase islam from turkey...
ingilizlerle birlik olup osmanlıya karşı isyan edip savaşan araplarda suç yok öyle mi? o senin yerlere göklere sığdıramadığın abdülhamid osmanlı topraklarının yarısından fazlasını sarayında otururken verdi. Sarayından çıkmadı bile. O küfür ettiğin atatürk cepheden cepheye koştu. bunları neden söylemiyorsun? İşiniz günüz yalan dolan.
As a Muslim Turk, I would like to say that the Ottoman Empire became very corrupt during this man's time, during the nationalism movement and the tanzimat period. Look at the man called Mahmud II, for example, he was the one who made wearing a fez a law (obligation) and introduced some secular systems into the state. In our opinion, he was the ‘Gavur Padishah’. Gavur means infidel. During the reign of Abdulhamid II, he was often subjected to fitna due to parasites within the state. When these parasites brought him down, they brought the old sultan, who did not understand the state affairs, to power and destroyed the state by putting the state into the 1st world war.
Remember this; the reason for this man's rebellion may have been unjust, but the British were not so simple, they broke their promises against the possibility that this man would increase his relations with Turkey, which was the continuation of the Ottoman Empire after the war, and placed the ancestor of the House of Saud. For example, Gertrude Bell was the one who destroyed the Ottoman Empire, she created more than 20 countries out of the caliphate, she was the teacher of Lawrence of Arabia. Whenever she entered Muslim lands, she would cover herself and speak as if she was one of them. Lawrence has a saying: ‘I was so carried away that sometimes I was praying evening prayers when no one was there.' Do you see the hypocrites?
For me, the most vivid story is the story of Abdulhamid. He is a paranoid man (as it is), he does not trust anyone around him (parasites), but one day he learns about a man in a town who has knowledge of hundreds of hadiths and has lived there for years. After testing him, he calls him to him one night and the man he brought in describes it like this; ‘’The sultan called me to him and I hurriedly went to him. when they took me to the palace, he was on the balcony, his back was turned to me, he turned to me and showed me a list ‘’the list of agents he had exposed‘’, he counted the names of each of them, I waited for my name, he hugged me and said words expressing his trust, he poured his tears on my shoulder. when he finished counting names in the list, I understood that the sultan couldn't have exposed me‘’ Arminius Vambery (British Spy)
And the sultan unfortunetly give him the most mahram(private) information of the state. Our saddest and weakest period indeed... If you look at the wars of the last century and mark them, you will see that you have drawn the borders of the last caliphate, that is, the Ottoman Empire.
You arent Turk..
I don't care who's right or wrong one thing is for sure we've lost our honor and security since the last khilafa... Please Muslims lets bring it back in some shape or form
In fact, the Turkification didn't alienate the Arabs. It is just the other way around. The alienation of the Balkan People killed the idea of Ottomanizm first, giving way to rise of Islamizim. Then the alienation of the Arabs killed the idea of Islamizim and gived way to Turkification. That was the only ideology left, to save the independence of the state, leaning on the turkish population and to focus saving the turkish majority lands, which is called "Misak-i Milli". As Mustafa Kemal Pasha back then stated: "Turkish boys will not die for the Arabian deserts anymore."
He was preparing to revolt long before ww1, and much earlier than 1916.
His advisors were the ones who suggested to ally with the british.
Who were his advisors?
Nodbody is saying british was solely to blame its just he was a trash
But why Music akhi ?
Shut up dude music is not haram its the so called babas and scholar who made a fatwa
Beethoven was a satanist, as were many major musicians. It's not a "baba" who spoke against musical instruments, it's even referred to by the oldest scholars in the Tafseer of Surah Luqman, and there are several authentic Hadith of our beloved Prophet (peace be upon him) himself, directly shedding light on the issue. But the lack of civility in your response to a polite question speaks volumes.
We where played like dolls and still are been played
One clear and known fact is that whenever a question or a personal thought is written as a headline in a newspaper or a youtube video (as of now and here). The answer is no and not. Dear gentlemen the Sherifs of Makkah are friends of Ottomans and not subjects, so there are no treason in this situation, and afterall the only one was open for realtions with the Ottomans is the wise Sherif Hussain, Hijaz state is considered a special state that is not controled by the Ottomans and never and if there was treasons of Ottomans go look who are the traitors from their subjects not the Sherifs. The Sherifate of Makkah is a higher rank than any rank more the Sultan and they knew it. Read history and understand the facts before posting here and there and before all respect yourself as the land will not respect your rotten body when you will be buried under it.
Should I like and help the Arab countries people that betrayed my ancestors back then even tho there's many sahih Hadith about 2 muslims fighting each other etc? Im not a nationalist but after watching this I honestly like Arabs way less than I already used to.
The average Arab is not your enemy. The average Muslim, Arab or non-Arab, is your brother. Remember what the Prophet (SAW) said in his last sermon. Not an Arab over a non-Arab or a non-Arab over an Arab. It might feel hard sometimes, but avoid being racist. The main leaders may be silent but there are many, many Arabs sacrificing their money and lives for p@les.tine right now. The actions of their traitorous ancestors are not on their hands. May Allah help unite all the Muslims. We need unity now. The tides are turning. We have to grab this wave that the Arab p@les.tinians are sacrificing their lives for, partly to open our eyes and realize that coming back to Islam is the only solution. And coming back to Islam means abandoning racism. Don't become the monster you fight.
YES he did. Just look at palestine, syria and iraq now. They were much better under the Ottomans
Thanks
The british changing their mind about him mightve been due to him not signing the treaty of Versailles, which the british demanded him to.
Why did Hussein bin Ali reign as Caliph same as his greatest father, Imam Hassan son of Ali ?
cool right ?
Ayo what? 😮 ottoman were centuries after prophet's grandson time
@@MiaMaraa
you missed the point.
Hasan son of Ali reign for 6 months before he gave up for Umayyad.
the Sharifate of mecca are supposed descendent of Hassan.
Sharif Hussein, after the fall of Ottoman Caliphate, he declared new Caliphate in Mecca but he last a Caliph for 6 months because of Saudi attacks and war..
@@Era_Of_Awakening Or was forced to.
@@Era_Of_Awakeningwhy dont you guys understand
Hussein and this and that
Doesnt matter
Ummah did it was supossed
To hell with this hussein and hassan
We are here now becaue of all that stupid infighitng for two losrs who got their heads cut off
and no hassan and hussein are not any prohphet so they cant be considered religious figure
They are historical figure
So dont try make your own cult on based this two losers
Today playing the Same Game by partnering with the U.S.
We must say one thing about the YoungTurks…The head of them Enver Pasha was a pro islamist but the process pushed him to Turkic ideology…Turcification didnt emerge abruptly…it came as opposed to armenian and different balcan ethnic groups’ revolts that bring about many killings of civillian Turks in the villages by these groups…
This comment section deals with unrealistic what ifs without seeing the history for what it is
He provoked by Lawrence of Arabia
There was also a norhern group of seperatists which was collabrating with France, but Cemal Pasha managed to prevent it before things escalated.
Ata Turk was a tool.
And that's how this man ensured the decline of Ottoman empire and have a lasting effect on the Muslim Ummah. Since this was the watershed moment that ultimately led to the unending problems of the Middle East
it was proficied that the jews would return to palestine
there was nothing we can do to stop it, theres no point in putting the blame on other ppl
❤ amazing video, but what does it mean by wahabbi followers?
Casts created in islam by english peoples so muslims keep fighting each other, in my country every cast of islam says that other is wrong
Hence divide ande rule
Cna you reply me is my previous explaination of wahabi comment showing or not?
No it’s not
@@ImpregnableIslam dont know why it wasnt showing anyway, wahabi is like a cast of islam in which people follow a specific imam. There are different types like wahbi, sunni , shia etc
There casts was created so muslims keep fighting each others
Hence divide and rule
It's so heart breaking how once mighty Muslims who were the super powers fell pray to the schemes of Disbelievers 😢
Did anyone recognize him as caliph?
No. He played the song and he listened to it.
Nice, it’s good to know that in the same way that Zionists have lost their memories past October 7th, the Muslims have lost their memories past 1948. Let’s always remember that nationalism is the reason of all the trouble in the Middle East, not the West!
Ottoman empire was dead anyway. Since 18th century, it was bad. They declared themselves as caliphate, but in reality, ordinary monarchy, which was super power until 1700s.
There are multiple errors in your video. First of all, turkification was only applied in the region called Anatolia. The Ottomans did not interfere with the internal affairs of the Arabian Peninsula, they only appointed governors, collected taxes and requested soldiers during jihad. And the seeking for independence & uprisings in the Balkans were long before the coup of the Young Turks and were generally supported by Russia. For example, Greece declared its independence long before the Young Turks.
The Ottoman Empire lost a lot of blood in the Balkans and Europe in the last century. After the French revolution, every nation in the Balkans began to revolt. The Ottomans lost many martyrs to suppress the rebellions. Essentially, the Young Turks were aware that the empire was deteriorating and they could not stop the disintegration, so they had no choice but turkification to protect Anatolia, where a large part of the population was Turkish, against such uprisings. This includes the Armenian deportation. Because Armenian gangs raided many Turkish villages in Eastern Anatolia and massacred the Turks, many mass graves belonging to the Turks were found. At that moment there was no choice other than turkification. Then the Ottoman Empire entered the First World War and became even weaker. Many Turkish soldiers were martyred to suppress the British-backed Arab uprising. Don't forget Fahreddin Pasha, who endured the siege with his soldiers, hungry and thirsty, to protect the holy lands. After all, there has been no peace in the Balkans or the Middle East for years!
Their grandchildren are paying the price for their betrayal. For example, Palestine
I don't think the revolt was unjustified. I think his cooperation with the imperialists is what made him the villain.
"Let's throw away our shackles with the help of the imperialist" yeah that never happened.
Just what sharif hussain bin ali died like a dog because he betrayed tye ottoman empire and believed tye British
He is going to answer
Shame on the Arabs of that time as well as their descended.
Ajam go learn history
He was decieved to betray the ottomans offered a poisoned sweet to blemish his credibility,well history has judged him already may Allah forgive and mercy on his soul after all he was just a human bound by weakness and flaws.
May the curse of Allah,the Angels,the Profets and the Belivers be upon him.!
The Arabs did not betray the Ottomans. It was just that the Saudi Family teamed up with the British and stabbed the Ottomans in the back. That's all.
Its not that simple to cover this topic but alot of research is needed ataturk isn't turkish but was a jew and his betrayal in Palestine battle field was result of so much land loss and all but countless others where all placed in ottoman army and this is a major issue that needs to be address
Ottoman lost its grace when they started following the Europeans. It was Khalifate in name. The literally adopted their constitution from the Napoleonic Code in 1858 not from Sharia.
Don't think he's entirely to blame. Everyone was backstabbing each other. Wanting power.
I thought it’s haram to rebel again Muslim ruler.
It is. A hundred years later and we are still arguing on who started 😅.
Muslim ruler?who? The last Muslim ruler was Abdulhamid who was overthrown in 1908. After that,ottoman state was ruled by a westernised YounG Turk kids who thought they could reform the empire but failed. There's a reason why Armenians,Kurds Arabs all rebelled
Nevermind brothers, the Ottomans gonna be back with your help!
Was it justified? Probably
Was it worth it? Arguably
DO NOT be fool it's not Arabs mistake alone, some of Turks also demanded to be separated from "Ummah"
Poor guy he was fooled by the Brits
he is not
@@ALZBNZ wdym💀
Arab revolt destroyed Khilafah and the strength of Ummah with it.
The Right to kick off of colonization and whatever form might be.
Biggest mistake the Ottoma's did back then is not to convert all regions they conquered in Europe to the islam. Pretty sure we would have a different outcome and even history today if things would have went that way. Unfortunately the brits and europeans like the french took over controll especially in the middle east and influenced loads of culture and behavior. It is how it is and we cant change it but still tey to make the world a better place
By that logic, ottomans would have fallen even more quickly. They survived by treating minorities good. The first Ruler Osman was known for his good treatment of Christians
In the end, it's all about power & when SATAN deceives those who want power & the ALMIGHTY gives power to whom HE wants.
No one should blame anyone for someones else's wrong doings.
The core matter is we the UMMAH have been defeated & we were collectively very far from islam then & now.
" NOTHING HAPPENS WITHOUT a PURPOSE. Nothing . Not even pain. That broken heart & that pain are lessons & signs for us. They are warnings that something is wrong. They are WARNINGS THAT WE NEED TO MAKE A CHANGE."
Taken from a sister's words ' Yasmin Mogahed'