@@skipe94 more ≠ better UWQHD is an entirely different format and at a normal viewing distance there is only a small difference in sharpness and detail
It really made me fall in love with gaming again, i was kinda meeeeh for ages about games, yolo'd and bought the alienware 120hz 1ms panel and it absolutely changed games, wow, borderlands 3, dusk, heros of the storm, its like playing all these games again for the first time, ultrawide is incredible
@@mason9119 It's not better at 32:9. It's too many pixels and performance is hurt. Even on 21:9 1440p as you can see 1% lows are sometimes under 60 (AC Odyssey, Valhalla, Simulator, RDR with some advanced settings, etc), which is pretty much bottom line when it comes to acceptable performance - and that's with the best CPU and GPU in existence on the planet. Also wider you go there are hugely diminishing returns of usefullness and immersion, imo sweet spot would be 21:9 (maybe some custom ratio slightly bit wider), but 32:9 is simply the point where it's too much for gaming.
I've been playing like this on my 65inch 4k tv by creating a custom resolution of 3840x1600 for years now. Sure, there are black bars on top and bottom but I play at night and turn off all lights. It's amazing.
3440x1440 high refresh is the most elevated way to game. A bit disappointed 3090 isn't a bit faster here, but probably could get there with some settings tuning.
Changed also to 3440x1440p. Best solution I ever used. Not to high/not to small. On 34 Zoll Monitor. Best ever :-). Loving it. Never back! Its so great. Thanks for video.
Finally tests in ultrawide, I have an AOC CU34G2X / BK 34 "and on Friday I get the MSI 3090 Gaming Trio, and there are few reviews on this resolution Thank you very much!
@@jaylapointe1654 I have no idea what you even tried to say. I'm guessing you think I envy some random self ego stroking dude on the internet, in that case, very astute observation of you. Good job too!
@@joaohenriquemartins1666 I mean you obviously understood what I meant based on your reply. He stated he has a setup exactly like what this benchmark is showcasing. Just because he stated it doesn't mean he is flaunting it for all to see. You are just hateful.
@@jaylapointe1654 Yes! You got the message! I hate tech ego strokers on youtube. I hate deceitful people in general. But on the off chance he is telling the truth, he's just a show off, so I'll hate him a little less in that case.
Extremely well done. Congratulation. And yes, ultrawide is by far the best resolution, much better then 4k, ultrawide angle with way less a performance hit. Not sure why it's still under the radar for many...
What i dont understand is that 21:9 is not adopted everywhere. Its the best screen format. 32:9 is already overkill. 21:9 is the sweet spot. The undustry is always pushing higher resolutions and think about 8k, while screens are still sitting on the damn 16:9. I dont get that.
Ugh, I was expecting better frames with the 3090. A lot of those games were sub 100 fps. I guess my dream of ultrawide 1440p @ 144fps will have to wait until the 4080ti
I appreciate the time investment. Thanks. But if these are the numbers for 3440x1440 ( I play at this res now), then we still don't have a GPU that can do 4k 120 or 4k 144. Sad panda.
Love my dual ultrawides. Main is the aw3420dw and the one on top is the xv340ck. There's no turning back from 3440x1440. Especially in a game like FFXIV. Hotbars and all the UI and you still have room to spare.
Its the sweet spot for nowadays techonology. Good performace, good resolution and the addition of space left/right makes it more immersive than simply adding pixels on a 16:9 monitor/tv.
I have GTX 970 and 34'' 2560x1080 ultrawide overclocked to 80hz. I'm going to buy either RTX 3080 or RX 6800XT. I think I should upgrade the screen to 3440x1440 144hz too. Do you think a monitor upgrade is worth the money?
These frames strike me as lower than expected for this resolution for a 3090, which is meant to be an '8k' capable card. I've ordered the 3080 and play at this resolution. Does this mean I'm still looking at sub 100fps for old games on the new cards. Interesting.
@@connorburbine9459 that's my point. The 3090 should be hitting higher FPS than the 2080 super for those games at this resolution. But it isn't in this video.
The best immersion came from 16:9 BIG SCREEN not larger format Ratio. 21:9 are useless marketing .... a lot of screen surface wasted! 32:9 are an half UHD for double price ! very smart solution!
If i would have money to buy solid pc wiyh 3080 or 3090 i would pick this resolution over 4k, for some reason 21:9 looks much better for me than 16:9. More cinematic i guess, also you have less pixels so more fps. Still looks epic since this is basically more wide 1440p.
my monitor is full hd ultrawide, 2560X1080 HDR, I'm just waiting to go out at 3070 to play with everything at its maximum, especially red dead redemption 2 😍.
I have this resolution but running on a 2060super.I def will be upgrading if I even find one of those cards even something like a 3080ti would be out if they existed now.
thankkk u so so muchh for doing ultrawide and any1 noticed in ac odessey fps is soo worse 3080 in 4k pumps that kinda fps in odessey but why 3090 struggling to maintain even 70 and its not even 4k
currently using predator z35 and still considering to upgrade to another 34" 21:9 1440P or 32" 16:9 1440P or 27" 16:9 2160P. Have some model and brands in mind like predator X34P/ X35 or samsung odyssey G7 or LG 27GN950. Any suggestion?
Right now I have an LG 21:9 but at 1080p. It's really nice for a modest system, freesync and 75hz. I really want to get a 1440p ultrawide, there are a bunch of new ones out with VA panels at 144hz in the sub $500 range.....only problem is I think I need an RTX 3080 to drive it. I'm guessing my RTX 2060 would struggle.....any chance you could post a benchmark with 2060 at 1440p ultrawide? GIve us an idea....
24k abos krass wie die zeit vergeht... Köntest du in zukunft evtl (alte) Hardware zb. 1660 ti i7 9750h nochmals mit den neuen games wie Horizon, MFS, Crysis, usw testen
Very nice stuff a new Graphics card is out of the question for the time but i think Next gen consoles will deliver very good results in 4K as well i cant wait to see RDR2 or Metro optimized for those.
Not sure if the 3090 is a gimmick card to push 8k tech that 99 percent of people will likely not own even in the next 2- 3 years at least. Or a legit card for 4k gaming as what has been shown so far there is like an average of 10 fps difference between the 3090 and the 3080 at 4k performance for what a 1000 dollars or more difference in price
Yup lol. Be aware ultra means all anti aliasing. Any supersampling options. The whole lot is enabled... Every game nearly has one or two settings that completely tanks the FPS.
TH-cam is simulating ultra-wide on my 1440p monitor, and even though I have G-Sync, and it's 27", I need an ultra-wide. We're still quite a bit off from native 4K getting 1% lows of at least 90 across the board, but we're pretty close to having 1440p UW reach that. :} Edit: With CPU's now being a bottleneck, maybe Ubisoft can step it the fuck up and make their games more optimized; it's hilarious that games like MGS V are almost on-par with graphics, yet Assassin's Creed fucks up e very computer if you don't play it at 1080p. Thankfully, people will be expecting PS5 and Xbox Series S/X to be running new games at 60FPS in 4K (even though it won't be possible for most of the games lol) - I can see Ubisoft having to fold under the pressure and optimizing their open-world games so people don't review bomb them.
Agree. I can run Doom Eternal at 120fps no problem on 2070 super, but Assassins Creed Odyssey and Watch Dogs 2 scrape 60 fps even with some settings turned off
I have a FE 3090 and my temps in game usually hover around 70ish. I also have a wider monitor (5120x1440) so maybe that’s why. Or maybe the partner cards just run cooler
Hopefully I don't get grilled for this but that's only if you want higher resolutions. Graphics is still widely accessible to lower cards at lower resolutions.
weird comment. physics engines are as advanced as they have ever been, gameplay mechanics are expected to be refined (and most of them are) and pc modding is still extremely popular if thats what you mean by customization. you also can still have great visuals on a budget, especially with the rtx 2000 series cards coming down in price and the gtx 10 series now being great budget cards if you don't want the ray tracing.
21:9 there's no turning back
Literally
32:9 there's no turning back. ;)
@@Brcinskij hahahaha,
@@Brcinskij but you get side letterbox while you watch a movie, right?
@@GuilhermeGiglio that's no problem at all. I am not watching movies on it. For movies I have 55" TV. 😉🤗🖖
Words can’t describe how amazing games look at this resolution. I went from a standard 4K monitor to a 3440x1440p monitor and I love it.
This resolution is much lower than 4k
@@skipe94
more ≠ better
UWQHD is an entirely different format and at a normal viewing distance there is only a small difference in sharpness and detail
@@skipe94 enjoy your tiny little 16:9 box with crunched fov
I truly love 21:9 gaming. There's just something about it. 😭😭😭
its even better in 32:9 , more immersive.
It really made me fall in love with gaming again, i was kinda meeeeh for ages about games, yolo'd and bought the alienware 120hz 1ms panel and it absolutely changed games, wow, borderlands 3, dusk, heros of the storm, its like playing all these games again for the first time, ultrawide is incredible
@@mason9119 It's not better at 32:9. It's too many pixels and performance is hurt. Even on 21:9 1440p as you can see 1% lows are sometimes under 60 (AC Odyssey, Valhalla, Simulator, RDR with some advanced settings, etc), which is pretty much bottom line when it comes to acceptable performance - and that's with the best CPU and GPU in existence on the planet. Also wider you go there are hugely diminishing returns of usefullness and immersion, imo sweet spot would be 21:9 (maybe some custom ratio slightly bit wider), but 32:9 is simply the point where it's too much for gaming.
I love ultrawide. I'm never going back to 16:9, it's too cramp for my liking now.
@SlaveLaboringKid 32/9 🙂
Red Dead Redemption 2 is such a beautiful game
yes ofc i wish to play it
How awesome it would be if Rockstar released some RDR2 DLC like they did with GTA 4 introducing new storylines...
I refunded it on steam, it was buggy for some reason
Absolutely! Such great atmosphere as well. Only wish that there were more buildings for shootouts
@@Billuhhanks how dare you boah
I've been playing like this on my 65inch 4k tv by creating a custom resolution of 3840x1600 for years now. Sure, there are black bars on top and bottom but I play at night and turn off all lights. It's amazing.
Dude, that sounds awesome!
Love you for the 21:9 content!!
Thank you 🥰
@@BENCHMARKSFORGAMERS hi bro
please what is the name of this music you using on your video ?
I came here for this 10:35 thank you! Now i know what to expect!
3440x1440 high refresh is the most elevated way to game. A bit disappointed 3090 isn't a bit faster here, but probably could get there with some settings tuning.
They are damn near 4k resolution now and 4080 or 4090 would max at a 1440p ultra wide at 144 frames
I don't have enough money for this, I'm just here to be impressed.
Me too man 🤤😆👍
Same here
Give me your social security number,
I got you.
man this looks sooo cinematic and immersive damn
edit: i'm having chills damn
I just want to say how thankful I am for your channel, you have taught a young man how to dream again of gpus being back in stock.
Changed also to 3440x1440p. Best solution I ever used. Not to high/not to small. On 34 Zoll Monitor. Best ever :-). Loving it. Never back! Its so great. Thanks for video.
amigo,deberia de tener mas likes este loco, se gasto tremenda guita
jajajajaja xd, es verdad
Finally tests in ultrawide, I have an AOC CU34G2X / BK 34 "and on Friday I get the MSI 3090 Gaming Trio, and there are few reviews on this resolution Thank you very much!
0
@@joaohenriquemartins1666 Jealousy and envy aren't good looks.
@@jaylapointe1654 I have no idea what you even tried to say. I'm guessing you think I envy some random self ego stroking dude on the internet, in that case, very astute observation of you. Good job too!
@@joaohenriquemartins1666 I mean you obviously understood what I meant based on your reply. He stated he has a setup exactly like what this benchmark is showcasing. Just because he stated it doesn't mean he is flaunting it for all to see. You are just hateful.
@@jaylapointe1654 Yes! You got the message! I hate tech ego strokers on youtube. I hate deceitful people in general. But on the off chance he is telling the truth, he's just a show off, so I'll hate him a little less in that case.
Highest quality benchmark video I've seen on TH-cam.
finally a video which fits perfect on theater mode
Ahhh. 3440 x 1440 144hz.
The real sweet spot.
Watching this on a phone with an ultrawide amoled display is pretty kickass
Could we have the same for 3080 ? Please !
Yes of course, rtx 3090 is bottleneck in low resolution
Subtract about 15% of performance. 👍
@@giorgionaghi6872 is this 3440x1440 considered low?
@@YogaSusetya no, i mean in 1080p
Extremely well done. Congratulation. And yes, ultrawide is by far the best resolution, much better then 4k, ultrawide angle with way less a performance hit. Not sure why it's still under the radar for many...
TH-cam needs 90fps and 144fps mode so we can truly appreciate this card
21:9 is best for games and movies.
Yep, I want to get a 21:9 monitor one day!
$4000 pcs when they see Microsoft Flight SIM:
I fear no game, but that one... it scares me
i just got my rx 3080 with a samsung 21:9 monitor... most underated aspect ratio ever, it is amazing to see first hand
This is really all i need to see regarding graphics cards and cpus. Thanks for this.
What i dont understand is that 21:9 is not adopted everywhere.
Its the best screen format. 32:9 is already overkill. 21:9 is the sweet spot.
The undustry is always pushing higher resolutions and think about 8k, while screens are still sitting on the damn 16:9.
I dont get that.
Ugh, I was expecting better frames with the 3090. A lot of those games were sub 100 fps. I guess my dream of ultrawide 1440p @ 144fps will have to wait until the 4080ti
Great comment and my thoughts exactly! I'm getting those frames on my 2080ti.
Finally someone who actually played RDR2 reviewing it on 30XX card. Thank you.
Love that widescreen. Also: Holy hell FlightSim at (near) 60fps.
21:9 is the way.
I appreciate the time investment. Thanks.
But if these are the numbers for 3440x1440 ( I play at this res now), then we still don't have a GPU that can do 4k 120 or 4k 144. Sad panda.
11:08 look at the shadows in the wall right side. Is is normal to slowly load like that?
Love my dual ultrawides. Main is the aw3420dw and the one on top is the xv340ck. There's no turning back from 3440x1440. Especially in a game like FFXIV. Hotbars and all the UI and you still have room to spare.
best res for immersion, and detail/performance without being as demanding on the card as 4k
Its the sweet spot for nowadays techonology.
Good performace, good resolution and the addition of space left/right makes it more immersive than simply adding pixels on a 16:9 monitor/tv.
Is that... Is that Serious Sam 4 benchmarks?!?! Hell yea!
Can you test 3080 in 21:9?
He did.
I have GTX 970 and 34'' 2560x1080 ultrawide overclocked to 80hz. I'm going to buy either RTX 3080 or RX 6800XT. I think I should upgrade the screen to 3440x1440 144hz too. Do you think a monitor upgrade is worth the money?
It's substantially more demanding than regular 16:9 1440p but man does it look awesome.
Great video !!
This is new future for RTX 4080 and 38" Display
12:45 I had no idea Ark was this beautiful :o
Works like a dream!
I'm running 3840x1620 (cx48)on OLED, it's unreal
I have a 3090 and the thing that amazes me is that the GPU temps are so good even under load! Runs so much cooler then the 3080!
This Video convinced me of 21:9, i came back now that i have my widescreen monitor
These frames strike me as lower than expected for this resolution for a 3090, which is meant to be an '8k' capable card. I've ordered the 3080 and play at this resolution. Does this mean I'm still looking at sub 100fps for old games on the new cards. Interesting.
I have a 2080 super and still hit 100fps on almost every game, whether it be on ultra or on high if necessary
@@connorburbine9459 that's my point. The 3090 should be hitting higher FPS than the 2080 super for those games at this resolution. But it isn't in this video.
@@richardbernard2361 yeah, I hate how they even say its 8k capable, because in pretty much every game u need ultra dlss and it barely hits 60fps
That "8k" capable is just like those "hd ready" Tv's from the middle of 2000. Marketing to milk the suckers that buy into it.
They're hitting cpu bottleneck necks with the cards at 2k+ 3840x1600 moght be a better show case
im at 1440p 16x9 wish i went 21 by 9. was too worried about the performance hit since I only had a 2080ti. plus my monitor is still fine.
the 3080 seems like the perfect 3440 card for gamers that prefer higher fps and cpu isnt the bottleneck in most games.
The 2080ti does perfectly fine on setup like this one in the vid.
Can you make benchmark on 3090 plus i9-10900k in 21:9 screen with 5120x2160 resolution? (Thanks in advance)
How did u get the 50-60 degrees Celsius for GPU temperature? Is it water cooling?
The best immersion came from 16:9 BIG SCREEN not larger format Ratio.
21:9 are useless marketing .... a lot of screen surface wasted! 32:9 are an half UHD for double price ! very smart solution!
Community: “You don’t need more than 10g of vram!”
Me: looks at flight sim and horizon vram usage...
Watching this on my Xperia 5 with true 21:9 aspect ratio. Looks so good.
I know 21:9 isn’t exactly ideal for competitive games but can you please test some multiplayer games at this resolution?
Oh sheeeit mine comes tomorrow! Can't wait!
What music is this from begining?
If i would have money to buy solid pc wiyh 3080 or 3090 i would pick this resolution over 4k, for some reason 21:9 looks much better for me than 16:9. More cinematic i guess, also you have less pixels so more fps. Still looks epic since this is basically more wide 1440p.
my monitor is full hd ultrawide, 2560X1080 HDR, I'm just waiting to go out at 3070 to play with everything at its maximum, especially red dead redemption 2 😍.
I have this resolution but running on a 2060super.I def will be upgrading if I even find one of those cards even something like a 3080ti would be out if they existed now.
Best wait to next 4xxx its so poor performance for 4k ....
What's the intro BGM? Does anybody know? - 0:01
What case are you using by chance to get the gpu temps!?
Control must be harder, wider view means more enemies can spawn at a time
hello man,why in the frametime graph there is some stutters in some games?
thx man,still the best
Wow... Once I see something like this, I'll never be able to go back to 16:9 ratio screen again.😵
thankkk u so so muchh for doing ultrawide
and any1 noticed in ac odessey fps is soo worse
3080 in 4k pumps that kinda fps in odessey but why 3090 struggling to maintain even 70 and its not even 4k
Ubisoft hard coding their games for consoles...
Can someone told me wich program is he using? Afterburner or precision x?
currently using predator z35 and still considering to upgrade to another 34" 21:9 1440P or 32" 16:9 1440P or 27" 16:9 2160P. Have some model and brands in mind like predator X34P/ X35 or samsung odyssey G7 or LG 27GN950. Any suggestion?
is it possible to run at lower res and use DLSS?
Why is RDR 2 not at the maximum graphics settings?
Right now I have an LG 21:9 but at 1080p. It's really nice for a modest system, freesync and 75hz. I really want to get a 1440p ultrawide, there are a bunch of new ones out with VA panels at 144hz in the sub $500 range.....only problem is I think I need an RTX 3080 to drive it. I'm guessing my RTX 2060 would struggle.....any chance you could post a benchmark with 2060 at 1440p ultrawide? GIve us an idea....
how much is this rig 3 to 4k ? the graphics just look slightly sharper not worth the money
wtf, im getting 75C on the same gpu. Do you use Dragon Center? I have it on game mode, extreme performance
24k abos krass wie die zeit vergeht... Köntest du in zukunft evtl (alte) Hardware zb. 1660 ti i7 9750h nochmals mit den neuen games wie Horizon, MFS, Crysis, usw testen
Ist teilweise leider nicht möglich, insbesondere Laptops stehen mir nur für kurze Dauer zur Verfügung 😕
Thanks for information. From Rusia with Love
Me: But can it run Crysis?
Bin Laden: [cries in MS Flight Sim]
Can you do Serious Sam 4 but ALL Maximum in settings? There's more options at additional parameters. Thanks.
Can you try and max out the Vulkan settings also in RDR2, and post the results ?
Some of the games are just poorly optimized, considering how they look vs how they perform.
have samsungs 32:9 aspect, too low frames atm still with new graphicscard :(
Very nice stuff a new Graphics card is out of the question for the time but i think Next gen consoles will deliver very good results in 4K as well i cant wait to see RDR2 or Metro optimized for those.
Not sure if the 3090 is a gimmick card to push 8k tech that 99 percent of people will likely not own even in the next 2- 3 years at least. Or a legit card for 4k gaming as what has been shown so far there is like an average of 10 fps difference between the 3090 and the 3080 at 4k performance for what a 1000 dollars or more difference in price
★Please tell me what the intro music is !!
Wow ARK ultra setting in 60-70 FPS
world of warcraft gets 60fps with 3090 in boralus harbour lol, has to be one of the worst optimized games ever
Yup lol. Be aware ultra means all anti aliasing. Any supersampling options. The whole lot is enabled... Every game nearly has one or two settings that completely tanks the FPS.
Идеальный фреймрейт в перемешку с высоким фпс - это то, что мне надо. За такое мне не жалко отдать даже 200к
и прощай зрение.
@@МеченыйСТАЛКЕР-ф9ц Почему? Чем будет отличатся от обычного 16:9?
за 200 к было бы охуенно. но такая сборка стоить будет не меньше 300к
Witcher Lover, не, я про видеокарту одну говорю.
name of this program to see fps ?
damn what an experience
Why no locked RDR2 settings?
nice info ! thx
TH-cam is simulating ultra-wide on my 1440p monitor, and even though I have G-Sync, and it's 27", I need an ultra-wide. We're still quite a bit off from native 4K getting 1% lows of at least 90 across the board, but we're pretty close to having 1440p UW reach that. :}
Edit: With CPU's now being a bottleneck, maybe Ubisoft can step it the fuck up and make their games more optimized; it's hilarious that games like MGS V are almost on-par with graphics, yet Assassin's Creed fucks up e very computer if you don't play it at 1080p. Thankfully, people will be expecting PS5 and Xbox Series S/X to be running new games at 60FPS in 4K (even though it won't be possible for most of the games lol) - I can see Ubisoft having to fold under the pressure and optimizing their open-world games so people don't review bomb them.
Agree. I can run Doom Eternal at 120fps no problem on 2070 super, but Assassins Creed Odyssey and Watch Dogs 2 scrape 60 fps even with some settings turned off
what I am doing here with my geforce gtx 1060?
I have a FE 3090 and my temps in game usually hover around 70ish. I also have a wider monitor (5120x1440) so maybe that’s why. Or maybe the partner cards just run cooler
So glad i have Asus PG348Q 100 hz + G-sync !
微軟的模擬飛行太誇張，3090在3440*1440的狀態下都跑不到60FPS...
Disappointing 3090 graphics performance or game optimization
seeing this.....i would need either the 3090 or 6900 xt for my lg 38gn950-b 3840x1600 160hz monitor nano ips. i get 60-80hz on my 5700 xt nitro+
LIKE FOR SERIOUS SAM!!!
I'm surprised how cool your GPU is running. Very nice. Is it liquid cooled too?
I heve ultrawide too, but my processor (fx8320) is really bad. I want to buy a new xbox, but I don’t know how 21:9 will work(
Games then:
-Graphics, physics, gameplay, customisation, challenge
Games now:
-We have just graphics, but only if your pc is too expensive.
Hopefully I don't get grilled for this but that's only if you want higher resolutions. Graphics is still widely accessible to lower cards at lower resolutions.
weird comment. physics engines are as advanced as they have ever been, gameplay mechanics are expected to be refined (and most of them are) and pc modding is still extremely popular if thats what you mean by customization. you also can still have great visuals on a budget, especially with the rtx 2000 series cards coming down in price and the gtx 10 series now being great budget cards if you don't want the ray tracing.
This monitor is a monster 👹