Liked this interview because Rick Beato's take is very realistic. Humans will not care, and humans won't stop making music, but AI will likely affect musicians' pay, devaluing music as a way to make money even more overall over time. Tay Tay and all other singers... might need to get a side hustle.
I respect Rick a lot but this was a masterful lesson on how not to answer questions straight and honestly. You gotta understand that Rick's already made. He's set and financially secured, so of course he is not "worried", and the same goes for all artists who already have a name to themselves and enough financial assets to be able to spout any optimistic opinion about this matter. The reality is it is already insanely difficult to make a living as a musician. This new tech will only put the final nail in the coffin of an already evident trend. Also, some of the questions asked were very imprecise. "Will AI eventually replace all musicians?" Man, that's a very poor question. Of course not. Not all musicians will die out. Watchmakers did not die out entirely neither, but how many people live off of creating luxury mechanical clocks in this day?
I love making and listening to music so i'm going to keep pushing myself to become a better writer and player and try to learn everything there is to know about the art of mixing and mastering. I don't want AI to take away any of the creative experience from me. If we give away our art creation to the machines and our culture and the things which make us human what will we be left with?
Fascinating look at the future of music and how humans relate to it. I really appreciate Rick's DEEP understanding of the probabilities of AI generated music. Super interview!! 👏👏👏 BTW This is an H.I. generated comment. (Human Intelligence) LOL!!!
One thing that many people keep forgetting about AI it's the fact that it never sleeps. It progresses every minute of the time we spend doing anything else. Ten years from now this world will be totally different. Especially our perceptions. We could be very easily influenced by someone /something that successful. Sad but real.
Yeah, clearly it wouldn't replace everyone. But it replace a lot of people. If you write background music for media, you better find something else real quick because there aren't going to be a lot of people able to survive in that area. The average production music composer who just writes generic music is about to disappear for sure. BTW, Rick is THE man when it comes to all of this. He's very open minded and knowledgeable. And your Coldfusion channel is by far one of the best TH-cam channels I've seen! very well produced and researched. I'm a big fan.
Good conversation. I applaud the fact that you were able to suppress your own fears and allowed Rick to voice his opinion. Every new technology is met with fear, because of the unknown and the fear of losing what you already have. Current music is created using technology. Look at AI as an additional tool for music creation. I really like the examples Rick gives how to use AI.
Yeah bud, the problem though is now we can’t tell if you’re an AI comment bot. Or if i’m an AI bot. It’s the complete breakdown of any real trust or truth that makes AI uniquely dangerous, more than any other tech we’ve developed.
Lol the problem is the AI will be able to do it all and make humans redundant. Sure you can do it for fun as a homeless person, forget a career though. The supply will far exceed demand, if people can magically create music why would they pay for yours.
Considering the knowledge and experience of participants in the podcast, I was hoping for a more comprehensive conversation about the impact of AI on music, art and creativity. I also expected a deeper comment from Rick Beato. For someone whose entire channel is based on music technology, music theory, musical creativity and musicianship, it seems like he looked at AI from a somehow smaller perspective. Current GenAI and LLM based systems marketed as AI are not the same as DAWs, autotune, sampling or loops etc., there is a fundamental mistake there. Since he has closely observed the technical development of music technology for years, he has evaluated the current role of AI very limitedly, seeing it as a "new tool". This is the perspective of almost all AI supporters as well; “a new tool”. In a way, it is, but the technology currently marketed as AI is like a Pandora's box. This technology, which will obviously lead to huge socioeconomic changes, is actually a perfect weapon for transferring wealth in the hands of venture capitalists, billionaire tech capitalists and mighty tech companies. On the other hand, in addition to the legality of the data sets used in the AI training , copyright, consent and the ethics of AI, when we look at the basis of this technology, it is actually open to debate whether it is really an "AI" or not. But these aside; The main problem with these GenAI technologies is that it is a system that produces results by reducing creativity to the products of very complex probability distributions based on billions of parameters and codes defined only by a set of possible indicators. What is the impact of such a technology on the cultural evolution of humanity and human cognitive abilities? What concrete impact will it have on abstract concepts such as music and art, which are actually tied to real human experience? I'd love to hear what they think about this. Beato is someone who has closely followed the technological developments in the field of music and their impact on music. He occasionally makes Spotify top ten reviews and complains about the poor musical quality of new hits. So, the effect of all these technological developments on music is not always positive. As he said, if there will be separate "AI music hits" lists in 2 years, I am very curious how he will evaluate them.
This was pure fluff and surface deep. Treats the viewer like we’re dummies. It’s insulting. This is a huge topic and you hit on some of the main ones. Especially its impact on us culturally.
5:31 "The first programs were Performer and Composer" -- SAME HERE! I loved Performer and started on it about 1991 until the mid 2000's. Ran them on my Macbook 185 and others Apple computers. I still have my Yamaha and MOTU Synths.
I think rick misunderstood the question about whether ai will substitute professional musicians. It doesn't matter if people still enjoy making music themselves - in order to be a *professional* musician you have to find someone to pay your for that. And this will get harder and harder the better ai generated music becomes.
This is common to not only Rick. Oh but I still enjoy making music, drawing, shooting photos, etc. Great, we all do. Does that keep a whole industry alive allowing people to do that as a job? Nope, it does not, or at least not with the same current large numbers. When a customer instead of sending you the brief to get a custom piece of music, simply enters it as a prompt and gets N versions of the brief in a few minutes or seconds, it is NOT like learning how to program MIDI instead of writing on paper or go from the type writer to a word processor - it's like going from employment to unemployment ;)
@@drummermike5150 but those performers would probably get much less money than current artists, as they would be replacable. Besides, we already have concerts solely eith DJs and even with holograms. I'm sure those will also become more common. And ultimately, no one is saying 100 % of professional musicians will get substituted. But it may well be > 50%. And this should be concerning to everyone whose livelihood depends on being paid to make music.
Exactly that! When I heard this piece of the interview on Cold Fusion's main channel, I was baffled at Rick misunderstanding this question. How can he ignore the fact that people need an income to survive? Or that "professional" means that "it is a profession" which means that it generates an income.
I think becoming a professional musician will become more difficult as it will be for sound engineering etc. Becoming wealthy from being a musician will be even more remote, but making music for enjoyment of doing it yourself will not disappear, and performing live will remain a human emotional enterprise.
Wow, it's kinda spooky how AI music is starting to sound just like stuff we humans make. It’s wild to think we might have to start calling tunes ‘human made’ just to tell the difference
The problem is in specifying what counts as AI made… Obviously if AI generates a whole song, but what about a musician who uses AI ti generate a chord progression they end up playing themselves? Or a track where just the drums are AI generated for example using something like Garage Band’s drummer? What if Diplo uses an AI trained exclusively on Diplo tracks to generate new Diplo tracks? Would we even be able to tell the difference lol?
I've heard quite a bit of AI music it sounds better than most modern mainstream music but still needs a lot more human controls over the creation to make it better.
Ai does not need to replace musicians. It will simply create its own market and take over (some) of the services (esp with repetitive tasks)that musicians provide for especially a certain demographic
Great interview! Love the thought experiment such as jamming live to AI generated tracks. I am going to try this! I already Jam to loops,, AI tracks the next step for me!
I bet his son could tell only because he was primed first and told it was AI. The same way people say they can tell an AI photo, but when you actually test them blind they can't
His son has the highest level of perfect pitch and grew up surrounded by music. I don't think Rick gave his son enough credit because if anyone could tell it's AI it'd be his son 😅
Imagine a dj prompting in real time, you see the prompt " horse laser on ice planet" you have no idea what that sounds like. Suddenly to the composition you are already hearing a realistic sound you have never heard before is added. I would attend that concert. For classical music could be something like monet on acid idk hahaha
The question of whether AI will take jobs away from musicians is short sighted and uninteresting. The real question is whether AI will remove the necessity for people to have jobs in the first place. AI will produce so much wealth so quickly. Will the rich and powerful be able to capture all of that wealth, leaving the general population to live in squalor? Or will we be able to share all of this wealth for the benefit of humanity?
Attn: Barry Manilow. New lyrics have been assigned. I write the code that make the whole world sing I write the code of love and special things I write the code that make the young girls cry I write the code that writes the songs
People seem to forget in this new doom & gloom ai trend. None of the music Ai creates can be copy written therefore no one owns it. So it cannot be sold or licensed legally. You cannot accept financial means for something you don’t own. Will people still do it? Yes, because there will always be crooked people.
1858: "Why a train can never really replace a horse&carriage." 1898: "Why an automobile can never really replace a horse." 1928: " Why an airplane can never really replace an oceanliner." 1988: "Why computer games can never really replace real world games."
Music theory is obsolete. It is certainly a misnomer. The great bassist Victor Wooten contends, [paraphrased] " ...what we have determined as music theory is really only note theory..." He suggests that music is something else that has nothing to do with written notes, instrument playing or conventional musical training. Music is deeper. A.I. is a good thing if it leads the way a greater understanding.
What defines quality in music? ...IMO human heart and soul.... the generator of emotion that drives our creativity comes from the heart of God of creation through us.. the God of creation ... not machines... having a soul is something AI doesn't have... it cant be reproduced.... the end product or creative piece is missing the most important ingredient of all... heart and soul ... code can never be written and reproduced by a machine.... Its just a somewhat tasty neuronal unhealthy treat thats probably about as healthy as GMO or synthetic foods are excellent for human health... we create to share with other humans... human to human connection is powerful and healthy... why would anyone ever want to replace that?
What about NEVER SAY NEVER? 😊 I MADE A VIDEO A FEW YEARS AGO ABOUT THE AI ripping the born skills from everyone soon, which will be terrible for the mental health of those people and even for everyone else. Imagine what will happen when our expectations will so high, even AI won't be able to provide us with new content that fast? What then? I am talking 20 years from now max. No laws will be able to stop it now so.... 😮😢
This is the final nail in the coffin. Near total devaluation of music. Stock music is dead, almost overnight. Musicians were already getting fleeced and barely making ends meet playing live. This has been well documented over the last decade. How will we know when something is made solely by a human? We won’t know and eventually we won’t care and there goes a part of our collective culture. This is total thievery and we need legislation yesterday. This should be a much bigger story in the media.
That’s a different discussion. The fact that music or any other art form made by an AI-tool can be as pleasing as human art piece. The trust part comes in when AI generate art is marketed as human generated. But that would be plain fraud. Fraud exists as long humans exist.
14:40 wouldn't it be more than you sound great in the free then buy the Paid only to find you Mae B don't sound that great then have to spend a Small fortune buying the better sounding Add Ons.
The top songs are very repetitive, if you can be replaced with AI you never had a job to begin with. The problem is that these jobs are too complex for a computer to replace them. I mean look at DJs they have thousands of songs on their Hard Drives, but only play specific songs at specific times, those computers can't replace the type of "computer conducting" that DJs have learned over a career. If they can't do that, they will never replace a live band.
You are right about top tens being formulaic but the dataset these models have been trained on are much bigger than all the dj hard-drives put together.
The process of creating art is dead. Reaching out with music AI generated or not, is dead. Rick Beato posting "Hello" on social media once, gets 10000 more likes, than most producers/artists get in their lifetime for all their released tracks.
What people dont undestand by saying they will still play their instrument or learn to sing even with AI.... Is why the next generation will do it ? IF you cant make any money OUT of it ANY CARRER because your proffesion has been completely devalued by machine why are you gonna spend your life and energy to do it ?like agriculture has been or handcrafting ? I saw less and less kids that want to learn an instrument nowaday more than ever in human history and pretty soon will be the same with real singing and even lyrics making has AI make cheaper and quicker Poem than everyone of us by just stealing us and art history data directly and play "random" button ...that basicly what Ai does... Playing instrument or singing will be irrelevant the same has going fishing in your lake or growing vegetables in your garden for the next future...a small porcentaje of population yes and not a necesity just a hobby... THE PROFESSION IS DEAD ...TECH COMPANY JUST KILLED IT AND THEY ARE LAUGHING AT US LIKE PSYCHOPATH THEY ARE...THE TRUTH HAS TO BE SAID Big part of the population gonna be poor jobless...for just a few CEO tech beings rich as fuccj... Paradox capitalisme Will prefer die to see this with my own eyes
AI is the most disrespectful exploitation machine of anything of real value. Why should a real artist like that? It's so incredibly boring and cheap - It’s so sad 😢
But a great musician can make great music with or without AI. The AI tools need to improve and we will soon hear better human musician made music than what AI on its own produces.
Liked this interview because Rick Beato's take is very realistic. Humans will not care, and humans won't stop making music, but AI will likely affect musicians' pay, devaluing music as a way to make money even more overall over time. Tay Tay and all other singers... might need to get a side hustle.
I respect Rick a lot but this was a masterful lesson on how not to answer questions straight and honestly. You gotta understand that Rick's already made. He's set and financially secured, so of course he is not "worried", and the same goes for all artists who already have a name to themselves and enough financial assets to be able to spout any optimistic opinion about this matter. The reality is it is already insanely difficult to make a living as a musician. This new tech will only put the final nail in the coffin of an already evident trend.
Also, some of the questions asked were very imprecise. "Will AI eventually replace all musicians?" Man, that's a very poor question. Of course not. Not all musicians will die out. Watchmakers did not die out entirely neither, but how many people live off of creating luxury mechanical clocks in this day?
I love making and listening to music so i'm going to keep pushing myself to become a better writer and player and try to learn everything there is to know about the art of mixing and mastering. I don't want AI to take away any of the creative experience from me. If we give away our art creation to the machines and our culture and the things which make us human what will we be left with?
Fascinating look at the future of music and how humans relate to it. I really appreciate Rick's DEEP understanding of the probabilities of AI generated music. Super interview!! 👏👏👏 BTW This is an H.I. generated comment. (Human Intelligence) LOL!!!
One thing that many people keep forgetting about AI it's the fact that it never sleeps. It progresses every minute of the time we spend doing anything else. Ten years from now this world will be totally different. Especially our perceptions. We could be very easily influenced by someone /something that successful. Sad but real.
Very well done interview. Congrats!
Yeah, clearly it wouldn't replace everyone. But it replace a lot of people. If you write background music for media, you better find something else real quick because there aren't going to be a lot of people able to survive in that area. The average production music composer who just writes generic music is about to disappear for sure.
BTW, Rick is THE man when it comes to all of this. He's very open minded and knowledgeable. And your Coldfusion channel is by far one of the best TH-cam channels I've seen! very well produced and researched. I'm a big fan.
Good conversation. I applaud the fact that you were able to suppress your own fears and allowed Rick to voice his opinion.
Every new technology is met with fear, because of the unknown and the fear of losing what you already have.
Current music is created using technology. Look at AI as an additional tool for music creation. I really like the examples Rick gives how to use AI.
Yeah bud, the problem though is now we can’t tell if you’re an AI comment bot. Or if i’m an AI bot. It’s the complete breakdown of any real trust or truth that makes AI uniquely dangerous, more than any other tech we’ve developed.
Lol the problem is the AI will be able to do it all and make humans redundant. Sure you can do it for fun as a homeless person, forget a career though. The supply will far exceed demand, if people can magically create music why would they pay for yours.
Considering the knowledge and experience of participants in the podcast, I was hoping for a more comprehensive conversation about the impact of AI on music, art and creativity.
I also expected a deeper comment from Rick Beato. For someone whose entire channel is based on music technology, music theory, musical creativity and musicianship, it seems like he looked at AI from a somehow smaller perspective. Current GenAI and LLM based systems marketed as AI are not the same as DAWs, autotune, sampling or loops etc., there is a fundamental mistake there. Since he has closely observed the technical development of music technology for years, he has evaluated the current role of AI very limitedly, seeing it as a "new tool".
This is the perspective of almost all AI supporters as well; “a new tool”. In a way, it is, but the technology currently marketed as AI is like a Pandora's box. This technology, which will obviously lead to huge socioeconomic changes, is actually a perfect weapon for transferring wealth in the hands of venture capitalists, billionaire tech capitalists and mighty tech companies. On the other hand, in addition to the legality of the data sets used in the AI training , copyright, consent and the ethics of AI, when we look at the basis of this technology, it is actually open to debate whether it is really an "AI" or not. But these aside; The main problem with these GenAI technologies is that it is a system that produces results by reducing creativity to the products of very complex probability distributions based on billions of parameters and codes defined only by a set of possible indicators. What is the impact of such a technology on the cultural evolution of humanity and human cognitive abilities? What concrete impact will it have on abstract concepts such as music and art, which are actually tied to real human experience? I'd love to hear what they think about this.
Beato is someone who has closely followed the technological developments in the field of music and their impact on music. He occasionally makes Spotify top ten reviews and complains about the poor musical quality of new hits. So, the effect of all these technological developments on music is not always positive. As he said, if there will be separate "AI music hits" lists in 2 years, I am very curious how he will evaluate them.
This was pure fluff and surface deep. Treats the viewer like we’re dummies. It’s insulting. This is a huge topic and you hit on some of the main ones. Especially its impact on us culturally.
As always. This podcast deserves so much more attention
5:31 "The first programs were Performer and Composer" -- SAME HERE! I loved Performer and started on it about 1991 until the mid 2000's. Ran them on my Macbook 185 and others Apple computers. I still have my Yamaha and MOTU Synths.
It wont replace artists or live musicians but studio musicians? Yep writers ? Yep
love it!
I think rick misunderstood the question about whether ai will substitute professional musicians. It doesn't matter if people still enjoy making music themselves - in order to be a *professional* musician you have to find someone to pay your for that. And this will get harder and harder the better ai generated music becomes.
Exactly, he didn't get this question. I really wanted to hear what his thought is.
This is common to not only Rick. Oh but I still enjoy making music, drawing, shooting photos, etc. Great, we all do. Does that keep a whole industry alive allowing people to do that as a job? Nope, it does not, or at least not with the same current large numbers. When a customer instead of sending you the brief to get a custom piece of music, simply enters it as a prompt and gets N versions of the brief in a few minutes or seconds, it is NOT like learning how to program MIDI instead of writing on paper or go from the type writer to a word processor - it's like going from employment to unemployment ;)
Someone will still need to play these AI generated songs live with real instruments and most “creators” will need to hire someone to do that.
@@drummermike5150 but those performers would probably get much less money than current artists, as they would be replacable.
Besides, we already have concerts solely eith DJs and even with holograms. I'm sure those will also become more common.
And ultimately, no one is saying 100 % of professional musicians will get substituted. But it may well be > 50%. And this should be concerning to everyone whose livelihood depends on being paid to make music.
Exactly that! When I heard this piece of the interview on Cold Fusion's main channel, I was baffled at Rick misunderstanding this question. How can he ignore the fact that people need an income to survive? Or that "professional" means that "it is a profession" which means that it generates an income.
I think becoming a professional musician will become more difficult as it will be for sound engineering etc. Becoming wealthy from being a musician will be even more remote, but making music for enjoyment of doing it yourself will not disappear, and performing live will remain a human emotional enterprise.
Wow, it's kinda spooky how AI music is starting to sound just like stuff we humans make. It’s wild to think we might have to start calling tunes ‘human made’ just to tell the difference
In a sense it is human made, because it was trained on patterns of human thought
The problem is in specifying what counts as AI made… Obviously if AI generates a whole song, but what about a musician who uses AI ti generate a chord progression they end up playing themselves? Or a track where just the drums are AI generated for example using something like Garage Band’s drummer?
What if Diplo uses an AI trained exclusively on Diplo tracks to generate new Diplo tracks? Would we even be able to tell the difference lol?
@@crypticallegorygood points indeed..
I'm sticking to bio music myself...however I did generate a cool song on UDIO the other day and honestly it's still stuck in my head
I've heard quite a bit of AI music it sounds better than most modern mainstream music but still needs a lot more human controls over the creation to make it better.
Harry Mack needs to get on that audience based prompted music freestyle idea!
Ai does not need to replace musicians. It will simply create its own market and take over (some) of the services (esp with repetitive tasks)that musicians provide for especially a certain demographic
Wow a hidden Gem 💎 🎶⚡️
Great interview and discussion. Thanks guys!
Ah yeah, I used MOTU Performer on a toadstool Mac when I was in high school.
Great interview! Love the thought experiment such as jamming live to AI generated tracks. I am going to try this! I already Jam to loops,, AI tracks the next step for me!
Live music in small venues, please...
Thank you for this interesting video. I'm now a new subscriber.
Good discussion. Thanks for sharing it. ✌️
My favorite youtubers together. Great
Rick's insights into our AI future are fascinating.......and frightening. Glad to be an old buzzard who won't be around to see how this all plays out.
44:12 (accidental?) Westworld reference is on point
"if you cant tell… Does it matter?"
Intentional. It's a Jewish take
You cannot stop human intelligence from growing through AI. Accept it or be left behind. Just remember what computers did to change work in society.
Ha ha!! It reminds me of Milli Vanilli. 😂😅
I bet his son could tell only because he was primed first and told it was AI.
The same way people say they can tell an AI photo, but when you actually test them blind they can't
His son has the highest level of perfect pitch and grew up surrounded by music. I don't think Rick gave his son enough credit because if anyone could tell it's AI it'd be his son 😅
Which should I watch first? Am on the CF side...
👍💪✌
Am back now.
My two favorite TH-cam channels together. Wow
They are used to hypnotise everyone
Imagine a dj prompting in real time, you see the prompt " horse laser on ice planet" you have no idea what that sounds like. Suddenly to the composition you are already hearing a realistic sound you have never heard before is added. I would attend that concert. For classical music could be something like monet on acid idk hahaha
The question of whether AI will take jobs away from musicians is short sighted and uninteresting. The real question is whether AI will remove the necessity for people to have jobs in the first place. AI will produce so much wealth so quickly. Will the rich and powerful be able to capture all of that wealth, leaving the general population to live in squalor? Or will we be able to share all of this wealth for the benefit of humanity?
Attn: Barry Manilow. New lyrics have been assigned.
I write the code that make the whole world sing
I write the code of love and special things
I write the code that make the young girls cry
I write the code that writes the songs
19:50 - i thought he was going to say Billie A.I.lish
There's already some great AI songs on the channel Obscurest Vynil!
What about If you had a Tracy Chapman in ur back pocket
Just put out a single called Slight Infractions that is my lyrics with Ai music. You can find it on my page among human performances too.
Songwriters who use ai will create more songs mare quickly but it's still up to the ear to make a determination if it sounds good.
AI is big techs trojan horse.
People seem to forget in this new doom & gloom ai trend. None of the music Ai creates can be copy written therefore no one owns it. So it cannot be sold or licensed legally. You cannot accept financial means for something you don’t own. Will people still do it? Yes, because there will always be crooked people.
If you can produce unlimited tracks at close to zero cost, copyright becomes obsolete.
Exactly, the algorithm will be so flooded with garbage that it won't be able to detect plagiarism anymore.
1858: "Why a train can never really replace a horse&carriage."
1898: "Why an automobile can never really replace a horse."
1928: " Why an airplane can never really replace an oceanliner."
1988: "Why computer games can never really replace real world games."
I don't think that was ever said by anyone.
Every thing is great until there is no electricy
Yes! cover band for Ai I can sing like anyone
Great. It’s an AI voiceover too. 🤔
Music theory is obsolete. It is certainly a misnomer. The great bassist Victor Wooten contends, [paraphrased] " ...what we have determined as music theory is really only note theory..." He suggests that music is something else that has nothing to do with written notes, instrument playing or conventional musical training. Music is deeper. A.I. is a good thing if it leads the way a greater understanding.
What defines quality in music? ...IMO human heart and soul.... the generator of emotion that drives our creativity comes from the heart of God of creation through us.. the God of creation ... not machines... having a soul is something AI doesn't have... it cant be reproduced.... the end product or creative piece is missing the most important ingredient of all... heart and soul ... code can never be written and reproduced by a machine.... Its just a somewhat tasty neuronal unhealthy treat thats probably about as healthy as GMO or synthetic foods are excellent for human health... we create to share with other humans... human to human connection is powerful and healthy... why would anyone ever want to replace that?
with a bale
2,000+ AI guitar songs, 99 new songs uploaded daily.
🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶
What about NEVER SAY NEVER? 😊
I MADE A VIDEO A FEW YEARS AGO ABOUT THE AI ripping the born skills from everyone soon, which will be terrible for the mental health of those people and even for everyone else. Imagine what will happen when our expectations will so high, even AI won't be able to provide us with new content that fast? What then? I am talking 20 years from now max. No laws will be able to stop it now so.... 😮😢
Synthetic transhumans like synthetic transhuman muzak.
This is the final nail in the coffin. Near total devaluation of music. Stock music is dead, almost overnight. Musicians were already getting fleeced and barely making ends meet playing live. This has been well documented over the last decade.
How will we know when something is made solely by a human? We won’t know and eventually we won’t care and there goes a part of our collective culture.
This is total thievery and we need legislation yesterday. This should be a much bigger story in the media.
That’s a different discussion. The fact that music or any other art form made by an AI-tool can be as pleasing as human art piece.
The trust part comes in when AI generate art is marketed as human generated. But that would be plain fraud. Fraud exists as long humans exist.
14:40 wouldn't it be more than you sound great in the free then buy the Paid only to find you Mae B don't sound that great then have to spend a Small fortune buying the better sounding Add Ons.
The top songs are very repetitive, if you can be replaced with AI you never had a job to begin with. The problem is that these jobs are too complex for a computer to replace them.
I mean look at DJs they have thousands of songs on their Hard Drives, but only play specific songs at specific times, those computers can't replace the type of "computer conducting" that DJs have learned over a career. If they can't do that, they will never replace a live band.
You are right about top tens being formulaic but the dataset these models have been trained on are much bigger than all the dj hard-drives put together.
The process of creating art is dead. Reaching out with music AI generated or not, is dead. Rick Beato posting "Hello" on social media once, gets 10000 more likes, than most producers/artists get in their lifetime for all their released tracks.
What people dont undestand by saying they will still play their instrument or learn to sing even with AI....
Is why the next generation will do it ? IF you cant make any money OUT of it ANY CARRER because your proffesion has been completely devalued by machine why are you gonna spend your life and energy to do it ?like agriculture has been or handcrafting ?
I saw less and less kids that want to learn an instrument nowaday more than ever in human history and pretty soon will be the same with real singing and even lyrics making has AI make cheaper and quicker Poem than everyone of us by just stealing us and art history data directly and play "random" button ...that basicly what Ai does...
Playing instrument or singing will be irrelevant the same has going fishing in your lake or growing vegetables in your garden for the next future...a small porcentaje of population yes and not a necesity just a hobby...
THE PROFESSION IS DEAD ...TECH COMPANY JUST KILLED IT AND THEY ARE LAUGHING AT US LIKE PSYCHOPATH THEY ARE...THE TRUTH HAS TO BE SAID
Big part of the population gonna be poor jobless...for just a few CEO tech beings rich as fuccj... Paradox capitalisme
Will prefer die to see this with my own eyes
✝️ Subbed! God bless in 2024! ✝️
You can’t copyright a voice. He should know better, being held out as an expert. Generally, the interview is otherwise informative.
we're screwed kids. maybe small live shows will endure, but large scale work is going to go away.
AI is VERY good at copying existing genres, so the people who should be scared are the ones copying others to make generic sounding music ,,.,
pale
is that why people are so dumb now
AI is the most disrespectful exploitation machine of anything of real value. Why should a real artist like that? It's so incredibly boring and cheap - It’s so sad 😢
But a great musician can make great music with or without AI. The AI tools need to improve and we will soon hear better human musician made music than what AI on its own produces.
He is so done; old guy not needed anymore.
At least he's lived to be old. Way the world is now you probably won't.
With that logans run attitude you won't have much longer before you are done. Enjoy while you can.
Give me a point he made that was obselete.