RICH Intel on China's Fujian Carrier: Design, Flight Deck & Sea Trial

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
  • We use high-quality media from the Type 003 Fujian's first voyage to analyse its flight deck and overall design.
    Want to support the channel?
    / eurasianavalinsight
    www.buymeacoff...
    Keywords: Type 003, PLAN, PLA Navy, Chinese Navy, modern warships, naval technology, electromagnetic catapult, military, supercarrier, Gerald R Ford carrier, Project 891.

ความคิดเห็น • 442

  • @gelinrefira
    @gelinrefira 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    This is probably one of the most practical, no-nonsense video on flight deck operations on a carrier. The schematic for the flight deck arrangements at different phases, especially comparing between Fujian and Ford is awesome.
    Well done.

  • @metanews7656
    @metanews7656 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The idea that this carrier is an evolution of the Shandong is interesting and makes sense. It gives them a working modern carrier with electric catapults in a shorter time period, and allows them to train the crew and pilots. And it gives them time to design a better carrier without the compromises you mentioned.

  • @lyle901209
    @lyle901209 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    Can’t believe the first aircraft launched from Fujian carrier is a DJI camera drone😂

    • @Chickenworm9394
      @Chickenworm9394 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hahahaha that's right

    • @xsu-is7vq
      @xsu-is7vq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Glimpse of the future perhaps. Unmanned aircraft would be the majority of the load out in 10-20 years.

    • @puterakayangan281
      @puterakayangan281 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeahh it call trials for a reason dude.US carrier first launched is trolly bro..

    • @williamblomster2387
      @williamblomster2387 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it will never launch a jet plane...systems are to weak..

    • @Highwind79
      @Highwind79 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@williamblomster2387 care to wager actual money ( I will take crypto or gold if you prefer that route) on it? I bet that Fujian will launch at least 1 aircraft before the ship is scrapped. Never is a very long time.

  • @phils4634
    @phils4634 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Those are remarkably good video clips and photographs. This ship is a major addition to the PLAN fleet, and I imagine the PLAN are rather proud of her!

  • @williamcarl4200
    @williamcarl4200 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I look forward to seeing a group sail of the Liaoning, the Shandong, and the Fujian.

  • @laydaisorr
    @laydaisorr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    🎉❤ Bravo to Motherland China 🇨🇳

  • @Unclesam404
    @Unclesam404 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    India’s kowtow aircraft carrier did not even carry aircraft. Maybe India should build more and put it as a museum for tourism.

    • @iqbang9236
      @iqbang9236 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who knows, maybe they have stealth aircraft? Optical stealth maybe?

    • @NightPhoenix.Y
      @NightPhoenix.Y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iqbang9236 lol, lmao

    • @謝啊發
      @謝啊發 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂

  • @donaldsmith1055
    @donaldsmith1055 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There are several thing about the layout of the Fujian that I think may be a problem in operations. Some of the weapons elevators are in locations that may conflict with aircraft parking making them useless. Weapons movement in the ship should be as direct as possible from the assembly area near the magazines to the flight deck. Working them from one elevator to another below deck around parked aircraft or through passageways just delays delivery. Having them reach the flight deck near the aircraft is not a help when the aircraft could have been parked anywhere on the flight deck. The weapons jettison ramps on the elevators would not help the hanger deck as the elevators would be up most of the time. I never saw a US carrier take armed aircraft to the hanger deck. Bombs and rockets would be disarmed and removed and taken to the flight deck storage area. The space outboard of the island on American carriers was used as a staging area for weapons on carts for the flight deck crew to draw from. Unless your operation a lot of Helicopters 2 places is enough and they would not need to be marked. Some of these problems come from inexperience in operation of a ship of this type. Operational knowledge must be applied at design. There are probably other thing is the design that we can not see that will be problems because of inexperience in operation. This is the way you learn but it gets costly when it's put it in metal because you didn't know. I see the Chinese have adopted the personal color code for flight deck operations from the US.

  • @nicolasroirand8011
    @nicolasroirand8011 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Bonjour , merci . Magnifique bateau . Toutes mes félicitations à ce grand peuple que sont les chinois . Leurs compétences et leur abnégation sont visibles dans ce superbe vaisseau .
    Je leur souhaite un bon futur .
    Au revoir .

  • @orzdxy
    @orzdxy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    the foward elevator position was originally designed for a steam catapult which is shorter than the current electromagnetic catapult, when they made the decision to switch to the electro magnetic catapult they decided not to re-design the whole front starboard side of the vessle

    • @james_l4337
      @james_l4337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ship parts already in construction, so minimising changes required.
      There's ~half year pause to refit, modification be done.
      There must ne a lot of internal structure changes between 2 different catapult

    • @DorJinTan
      @DorJinTan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@james_l4337i'ld imagine emals to b less bulky internally.

    • @xsu-is7vq
      @xsu-is7vq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@james_l4337it would have been more than half a year of delay if they make more design changes. Not just due to parts already been manufactured. The hull length would have to change to accommodate the longer catapult while maintaining relative position with elevator. that impacts the weight balance, hull strength, water flow around the hull, and possibly power requirements. All of that would have to be recalculated and verified.

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @orzdxy Source ? Or is this just a personal theory ?

    • @james_l4337
      @james_l4337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xsu-is7vqchanging the entire front nose structure is a 1/4 ship. Building another 1/4 mean ship was a lose lose design from get start.
      So everyone is correct as minimal chnage as is possible
      Limiting only to replacing steam catapult to EMALS
      Although lot more expense then do it right 1st time
      It release lot more room internal for other use.
      Also a carrier PLAN had to live with for 40 or more years. It's 20 million to fill up its tank!
      It will have been better to cater for EMALS in 1st place, as that is the future that's how overtaking can happen.
      Steam catapult has inherently all points not equal to EMALS, same with launching planes with earlier catapult (not steam) that also isn't a viable option for plane that's now 10 to 40+ tons
      Redeemable fact of higher up that EMALS, is put on shio 😊

  • @Dragon24123
    @Dragon24123 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Huge Respect to the Chinese and China

  • @junechris
    @junechris 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Go China!

  • @johnbodman4504
    @johnbodman4504 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It look really tidy, without the sky ramp.

  • @gelinrefira
    @gelinrefira 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It is quite interesting that the hull design is still based largely on the Shandong. Type 004 could be the first time the designers move away from Shandong base hull for a clean sheet design that will allow a redesign of the entire hull structure that is more suitable for a supercarrier and even for nuclear propulsion.

    • @twlamSG
      @twlamSG 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, I think it is high time the Chinese move away from Russian design. Since they can design huge ship there is no reason why they will struggle to design newer aircraft carrier. Maybe the new design and testing took longer than desired hence this Fujian is a fusion of both Russians and Chinese design.

  • @CheapSushi
    @CheapSushi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I noticed two camera turrets on the front edge of the bow deck as well. Pretty cool.

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes the electro optical turrets, aka R2D2

  • @rubenreyes4477
    @rubenreyes4477 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is much better aircraft carrier design than the other two Chinese aircraft carriers.
    It is also has a high maintenance cost 💲 later..

  • @nostradamus2642
    @nostradamus2642 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The Indians say the Fujian can't swin Butterfly style. With each rise of the bow creating extra lift their 1980s vintage Mig-29 roll off the ski jump well timed can be launched without the need for catapult.

    • @enshk79
      @enshk79 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hahahahaha

  • @清风-u9m
    @清风-u9m 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very professional video Fujian ship is a beautiful ship.

  • @honfmeilingfleet957
    @honfmeilingfleet957 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    in Moderrn Warships event i have Type 044 i still like using Fujian

  • @AbolishtheNFA
    @AbolishtheNFA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Soon as they show video of this fishing boat actually launching aircraft from its deck ill acknowledge it. Atm its just a toy.

  • @baozuci3594
    @baozuci3594 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why are there no pictures of the Fujian's funnels? Is this CGI?

  • @Mark-jy6xd
    @Mark-jy6xd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Limited range with diesel propulsion, unlike US nuclear carriers.

  • @RichardsMiscCorner
    @RichardsMiscCorner 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The iterative approach makes a lot of sense. You don't do three different carrier generations in 17 years without borrowing extensively from the prior version. It will be interesting to see the island placement on the Type 004.

  • @danielmartin7838
    @danielmartin7838 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Who was chosen to be captain?

  • @tonysia6474
    @tonysia6474 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    More power PLA Navy 👍💪❤

    • @hanhuang7263
      @hanhuang7263 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's called PLAN bro

  • @mysygisun3335
    @mysygisun3335 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5月公試に於いて、主機のボイラー・スチームタービンによる
    全力航走(黒煙を吐いての航走画像)に成功したことは、
    chのエポックであり、次期航母からの原子力化が
    見えてきたということでしょう。
    6月に入り、渤海で最高最高死を行っていることからも、
    chの018福建の早期就役に並々なら無い、
    力の入れようがわかると思います。

  • @brunojm7282
    @brunojm7282 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    He will look better at the bottom of the sea, as an artificial reef for fish.

    • @alinux09
      @alinux09 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Cry hard baby😂

    • @brunojm7282
      @brunojm7282 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alinux09 laughing hard my little pink wumao chihuahua warrior keyboard wanker. Just stay within your Great Wall of infamy.

    • @ThomasLee-gu7vt
      @ThomasLee-gu7vt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can rest assured that the Fujian will sink after the Ford.

  • @AussieMaleTuber
    @AussieMaleTuber 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Fujian will have the world's best anti-missile and anti-torpedo defense.

  • @tophey9762
    @tophey9762 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks so much for the very detailed tech explanation! It's so bad than a subjective and baseless comment video

  • @Ryo_Dragon
    @Ryo_Dragon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks good on paper

  • @cjm2995
    @cjm2995 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When will China design their own stuff?

    • @有明-p4f
      @有明-p4f 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      U r just too poor to get access to Chinese design, maybe.

  • @naga2015kk
    @naga2015kk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    should there be an ANTI SUBMARINE carrier t o accompany the aircraft carrier?

    • @amunra5330
      @amunra5330 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      There is ALWAYS a submarine with a carrier

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@amunra5330 Source ? Or just a personal theory ?

    • @johnbuckles1344
      @johnbuckles1344 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RectalRooter amunra is quite correct. Any USN carrier task force at sea will be accompanied by at least one Los Angeles class attack boat. More often than not the task force will be trailed by a Russian attack sub. It is like this everywhere, for any modern Navy.

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnbuckles1344 So you guys are saying China's culture can only copy others and is not able to be imaginative / foreword thinking in it's procedures and techniques ?

    • @johnbuckles1344
      @johnbuckles1344 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RectalRooter What the hell kind of misinterpretation is that? This isn't about denigrating the Chinese Navy, it is just a basic tactical arrangement. The Chinese would be stupid to not do the same thing, why would you leave your surface ship vulnerable to submarine attack? Do you have even the slightest knowledge of naval history or tactics?

  • @ycplum7062
    @ycplum7062 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can almost guarantee US aircraft were observing the trails AND there was a submarine or two grabbing acoustic signitures of the ship. ROFL
    It should be kown that rescue helicopters should already be in the air during aircraft launches and recoveries.
    Fujian is a modification and upgrade of the Shangdong, not a clean sheet design. To be fair, I still believe the Fujian is a technical demonstrator and training tool to develop air operations protocols and carrier doctrine (and possibly changes to carrier fighter designs). While it can be pressed into combat operations, I do not believe it is its primary purpose. As such, I believe it will be a single-ship class becasue the next class will incoprorate lessons learned from the Fujian. China's first carrier designed for actual combat service will be a multi-ship class.

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I am quite sure that no US aircraft carrier leaves port without being observed by China and Russia. Everyone watches everyone. I don't see why that is particularly amusing.

  • @Rob-rr4yp
    @Rob-rr4yp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Shows some drawbacks to the iterative style of the PLAN design process. A lot is said about the inefficiencies of the US procurement style, but it does have its own benefits to its bespoke designs. Any jump as big as one to a CATOBAR carrier would have tried to maximise the potential of the new ship, with the capabilities and costs that come with it, unlike the way the Fujian has been designed.

    • @alhkcblack9617
      @alhkcblack9617 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The existing configuration he said has to do with continuing familiar operations with the existing carriers China already has. Which frighteningly might also mean China doesn't want to waste time with all new processes yet because this carrier might be needed soon because war is near. What you mentioned about maximizing the potential of a new carrier config might be reserved for the next upcoming nuclear carriers.

  • @Jaysqualityparts
    @Jaysqualityparts 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Tofu-004 almost as good as a Nimitz class carrier same size. Now you need to teach all your pilots how to land on it. I wonder if the ocean could be any calmer. The door on the tower is to jump while it’s sinking. Wonder if it does 44knots

    • @Flightman453
      @Flightman453 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cope

    • @hbc511
      @hbc511 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stop crying bud

  • @ethanmac639
    @ethanmac639 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    🇨🇳🇷🇺🇮🇷❤️

    • @lifetrees1
      @lifetrees1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Axis of evil 😂You are missing 🇰🇵,fatty Kim is upset at you😅

  • @KumChengLiew
    @KumChengLiew 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Look good.

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Just like China's first two carriers, it is probably a prototype, as part of China's plan to perfect a fully fledged carrier. Next one will possibly be nuclear powered, and slightly different!

  • @moeblack1566
    @moeblack1566 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is the fuckjin carrier this video is showing the ford carrier videos

  • @williamblomster2387
    @williamblomster2387 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    has to go to sea with 2 tugboats and a oil supply ship

  • @CC-ns2ds
    @CC-ns2ds 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does anyone know if Aircraft carrier CWIS systems are active during sea trials? Seems very vulnerable to a preemptive strike if they aren’t.

    • @ChronicAndIronic
      @ChronicAndIronic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      the us lacks the spine to be smart like that

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      OMG OMG hurry and Call Xi about your -- Not very sounding conspiracy theory -- theory.. Your call will save China from Intergalactic aliens sinking the ship

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ChronicAndIronic Have you been call a Rotard a lot during your life ?

  • @JOzzie-u8z
    @JOzzie-u8z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's funny is you lot do t know how to build good aircraft carriers amd youve tried building one nearly as big as the usa ones but the difference is the usa has 90 or more years of carrier knowledge

  • @Farzan4741
    @Farzan4741 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    funniest part is when britain operates two comventional carrier its blue water navy but when china operates three comventional carrier its not blue water.its just coastal

  • @syq8888
    @syq8888 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    potential problem of the port side HQQ-10 shorad SAM in the way of a failed launch from the 3rd catapult or a bolter landing mishap.

  • @ChillinVillin-in7sj
    @ChillinVillin-in7sj 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait till you see the next aircraft carrier; it will be as big as a small “state”moving through the sea,there will no words to describe this achievement.
    It is being made now in unprecedented secrecy.🀄️

  • @FlyxPat
    @FlyxPat 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Dictators with toys is always a bad sign.

    • @发复古
      @发复古 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      American people are ruled by an alzheimer patient,which is a bad sign.

  • @zhengnanyan3890
    @zhengnanyan3890 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    你出卖福建舰情报,居心何在

  • @No-timeforimbeciles
    @No-timeforimbeciles 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done China 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳

  • @scottgraney5275
    @scottgraney5275 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We have been building carriers for 50 years china doesn’t have clue. Just watch

  • @ChiefBridgeFuser
    @ChiefBridgeFuser 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sails great on a flat, glassy sea.😮

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At the hull length it has, I would expect that it will sail as well as a US carrier on rough seas. I was on the Forrestal in a bad storm, and the arc of the round-down was 12 feet, which is too dangerous to recover aircraft, so if you can't recover an aircraft, you can't launch an aircraft, so everyone is just going for a ride.

  • @Majorillin
    @Majorillin 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The carrier long strangely familiar to to an American carrier I’ve heard the complement is when someone or some country copies another countries military equipment but if China keeps doing this it will stagnate and will never innovate

    • @MrSchwabentier
      @MrSchwabentier 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      but why would you change something that works? Carriers have been looking this way for a reason. So making it worse just to look different isn't smart

  • @Lalramkumhlunsitlhou25300
    @Lalramkumhlunsitlhou25300 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Idk why this video make sense .... I just find it true when I think about ur analysis of my own ❤️

  • @chillxxx241
    @chillxxx241 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like AI. All of the pictures I have seen have a tugboat in them.

  • @eddiepearl536
    @eddiepearl536 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🤔just wondering how much resupply is needed since it’s capacity to carry fuel for aircraft and munitions is degraded due to requirement too carry fuel for its oil burning power plant unlike the US nuclear powered carriers 😂. Also wonder how much strain is on the ships electrical generating systems when fully operational and trying to continuously launch aircraft with a electro magnetic catapult. Obviously its systems have no reserve power and might actually be limited to sporadic operations unlike the US Nuclear powered carriers which have a rather large power reserve during full and continuous operations 😂 still decades behind the technical abilities of US nuclear carriers not to mention no experience or proven system of how to cycle aircraft and perfo4m maintenance on a large operational scale

    • @MrSchwabentier
      @MrSchwabentier 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But you need to resupply all the support ships anyways, so one more ship to supply isn’t that big of a deal.
      For the electricity you can solve that issue by catching the power usage peaks with large batteries.

  • @fdjw88
    @fdjw88 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When will the planes get on this ship?

  • @damirmasic7432
    @damirmasic7432 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Znači Đorđ buš je smanjeni.vec 3ili 4 puta

  • @AccordGTR
    @AccordGTR 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'd like to see how it holds up with hits from Brahmos missile

    • @sexgod6909
      @sexgod6909 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They won't be able to get close enough...India is a third World country compared to China. .

    • @李大人-m7p
      @李大人-m7p 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      我说布拉莫斯是垃圾你信不?1990年代的垃圾技术😂😂😂

    • @XuesongWang-s5x
      @XuesongWang-s5x 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That missile the Indians launched, they didn't even know where it was headed. Why do you guys always step out and make a spectacle of yourselves? The Brahmos missile, what a dud, don't you guys have a clue?

    • @No-timeforimbeciles
      @No-timeforimbeciles 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would like to see how US carriers hold up against hypersonic missiles 😊

    • @russelfang7434
      @russelfang7434 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Bro actually thinks BRAHMOS is something.

  • @cA7up
    @cA7up 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice cgi work 😮😅

  • @scottgraney5275
    @scottgraney5275 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chinas first attempt at USA carrier it will fail.

  • @soothinglycool9806
    @soothinglycool9806 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tofu junk on the high seas.

    • @有明-p4f
      @有明-p4f 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      While junk like u surf in the comments...😂

  • @침착플러스
    @침착플러스 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don't worry. It's just a fake CG.

    • @结月-q6c
      @结月-q6c 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SFA的同志辛苦了

  • @paladin7422
    @paladin7422 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Fujian China war ship. Big

  • @bonkersblock
    @bonkersblock 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Aircrap carrier that needs to refuel every 4 months! 😂😂

    • @kanestalin7246
      @kanestalin7246 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All carriers have to replenish supplies eventually

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was in the Marines and did a cruise on the Forrestal. We never went very long without having a big supply ship pull up next to us and load fuel for the aircraft. Also, China has no desire to project power over the entire world, they only want to project power over the seas around them. That may change in the distant future, but the Chinese have no intention of making war on the US just as we have no intention on making war with them. The trillions of dollars we spend on defense mostly goes to attaching third tier opponents like Iraq and the Houthis. The US military has not shot down a USSR, Russian Federation, or People's Republic of China jet, or sank any of their ships. We spend trillions of dollars on these weapons and the only think the F-22 has ever shot down was balloon. Wow.

  • @jasonolivas1969
    @jasonolivas1969 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Garbage

  • @kuofuchien7827
    @kuofuchien7827 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    雖然英文發音字正腔圓。 可是聽起來就是十足的官方宣傳節目。 建議請個外國人來宣讀,會比較自然有效。

    • @danielmartin7838
      @danielmartin7838 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I like the narrator, his Chinese accent doesn’t detract from the program.

  • @Hellfox777
    @Hellfox777 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LMAO! You only tested the engines? C'mon, son. You DIDN'T test the RADARS or CATS? OK, I see this carrier is going to be in trials for a minute.

  • @durbanbudz
    @durbanbudz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It will make a nice artificial reef.

    • @sexgod6909
      @sexgod6909 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      As do all American ships...And their tranny sailors..

    • @Chickenworm9394
      @Chickenworm9394 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You Indians always talk but no action

    • @Flightman453
      @Flightman453 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cope.

    • @durbanbudz
      @durbanbudz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Flightman453 Scuba.

    • @Flightman453
      @Flightman453 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@durbanbudz Cope.

  • @kentonge1812
    @kentonge1812 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Made of plastic/steel me thinks.

    • @XuesongWang-s5x
      @XuesongWang-s5x 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I suggest you try to work hard and live a better life. This way, you can have time to develop your brain a little bit and eliminate some of these speech impediments that seem like intellectual disabilities.

    • @kentonge1812
      @kentonge1812 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@XuesongWang-s5x well you keep on buying chinese crap if you are happy with inferior products.

  • @Cannoli_JJ
    @Cannoli_JJ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    中國最厲害的航母永遠都是下一艘!期待004 和 005!至於印度,那只不過是個跳梁小丑而已。🤣

  • @bedfordforrest4426
    @bedfordforrest4426 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The next artificial reef

    • @Chickenworm9394
      @Chickenworm9394 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      INS Vikrant will be first

  • @johnjarrett3311
    @johnjarrett3311 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂😂😂😂

  • @thomasbreen3644
    @thomasbreen3644 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Makes a nice target for the USS Seawolf

    • @kanestalin7246
      @kanestalin7246 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      USS Seawolf is a nice target for an undersea mountain

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kanestalin7246 hahaha Yeah Those were 2 big booboo's
      Everyone remembers the F-ups and not the 968 years of competent submarine seamanship

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As does any US carrier for the Chinese nuclear attack submarines. It is questionable in my mind if carriers are even relevant against teir 1 opponents like China or the Russian Federation. They may be great for fighting Houthis or Iraq, but I think not so useful against modern, nuclear armed states.

    • @RichardsMiscCorner
      @RichardsMiscCorner 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shenmisheshou7002 as we've seen in Ukraine, USA or any nuclear capable country is usually avoided at all costs from direct war. All these western folks who get a hard on over war always seem to think that the US and Allies will get into a shooting war with China. That won't happen, because China has nukes. China wouldn't attack US capital ships for the same reason USA wouldn't attack Chinese capital ships directly. People are alarmingly living in some kind of war thunder fantasy land.

  • @timothyseeger5296
    @timothyseeger5296 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +103

    That's why it is called a shakedown cruise , to work out the bugs , it took over two years for the Ford to complete them.
    That's a nice looking boat 👏👊

    • @HBCOU
      @HBCOU 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thank Daniel Duggan

    •  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      However in this case, the chinese are trying to figure out if it's a ship...

  • @ethanmac639
    @ethanmac639 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    🇨🇳🇷🇺🇮🇷❤️

  • @Wvk5zc
    @Wvk5zc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Will you be covering the newly sighted china drones carrier?

    • @jinz948
      @jinz948 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I saw this story but feel like it never had any evidence.

    • @王安澜-m1u
      @王安澜-m1u 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      you mean 076LHD?

    • @thehumus8688
      @thehumus8688 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@jinz948 There satelite image of it being build in jiangsu dayang shipyard. along with 2 Catamaran "Drone Mothership"
      I have seen the photo, which quite weird. its like LHD but cut in half ?!?

    • @montys420-
      @montys420- 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@王安澜-m1uno not a LHD

    • @jaihindersingh
      @jaihindersingh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Feelipins nott evun afreit. Dhey ar williing becom cannan foddurs for Amerikka an winniing waar evedyday laik ukrein

  • @namelesswarrior4760
    @namelesswarrior4760 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    What a MAGNIFICENT Aircraft Carrier! Beautiful & Deadly!

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      China needs to throw her weight around. This carrier isn’t designed for use against Taiwan or Japan, but to enforce its interests in Africa. In a shooting war with the US this carrier will need to be under a shore-based air umbrella and anti-aircraft missiles. Because it will be outnumbered 5-1 by larger carriers with decades of combat experience.

    • @DonAbrams-hq7ln
      @DonAbrams-hq7ln 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Looks like a Russian carrier ,no smoke. Another pos made to look like ours. Thanks Clinton for selling us out.

    • @子弹滞销帮帮我们
      @子弹滞销帮帮我们 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@CorePathway用你的大嘴巴吗?

  • @snapper69996666
    @snapper69996666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Great update, thank you

  • @tonywei423
    @tonywei423 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    The public broadcasting the high definition video of the new aircraft carrier shows the confident of Chinese Army also the strategy change on top of it. We expect to see more of these in the coming time.

  • @jjl4381
    @jjl4381 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +171

    Compare to Indian aircraft carrier, Fujian sails smoothly and swiftly... Indian aircraft carrier rocks up and down like kowtowing making big waves throwing the weight to one side out of balance😂

    • @cabasadefogo9533
      @cabasadefogo9533 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

      Don’t underestimate the power of cow dung!

    • @OkOk-qd2nc
      @OkOk-qd2nc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      China is competing with the USA not India.

    • @謝啊發
      @謝啊發 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      估計印度耍破防了

    • @kendrosstragopulos3642
      @kendrosstragopulos3642 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I see no waves in this clip, so untill there are similar conditions you can't compare.

    • @Zerpentsa6598
      @Zerpentsa6598 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Have you seen the HMS Queen Elizabeth? It couldn't even move to make waves. Kept leaking.

  • @chevaliersdesangreal2490
    @chevaliersdesangreal2490 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    From iran with love for C H I N A 🇨🇳 🇨🇳 🇨🇳

    • @Cannoli_JJ
      @Cannoli_JJ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      給我狠狠踢美國佬的屁股!😂

    • @worldatpeace8979
      @worldatpeace8979 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have you recovered the body of your dead dictator ?

    • @phillipjohnson1459
      @phillipjohnson1459 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      From America fu

    • @子弹滞销帮帮我们
      @子弹滞销帮帮我们 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@worldatpeace8979美国🐶又跑出来乱咬人了

    • @geraltrivia1436
      @geraltrivia1436 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@worldatpeace8979西方人只有被枪顶着头,才会说真话

  • @shiweicai4872
    @shiweicai4872 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    So elegant.

  • @aripsense
    @aripsense 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Dont worry is just a paper ship wkwkwk listen to the western and indian analysis says😅

  • @Mearex_
    @Mearex_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    excited for the fourth carrier

  • @bradgolding6847
    @bradgolding6847 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    A very beautiful ship. Another great video ENI, many thanks!

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Many thanks!

  • @justme6275
    @justme6275 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    NICE LOOKING SHIP 🥰

  • @robertlee6338
    @robertlee6338 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Every single class carrier China builds like the Fujian is just a proof concept and likey used for training in the future, when China builds its first multi hull order.

    • @georgemorris9616
      @georgemorris9616 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Exactly. China only builds one of each class as a development platform. Fujian is a Type 003. There are strong rumors that the Type 004 will have 4 EMALS cats, and quite possibly nuclear propulsion. I personally expect that will also be a development platform, as the Chinese are smart enough to avoid a Ford-type disaster. I expect the Type 005 will become the first Chinese Fleet Carrier. And they will build the heck out of them when that time comes.

    • @xsu-is7vq
      @xsu-is7vq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@georgemorris9616well, the only new technology for a nuclear powered 004 would be just the propulsion system. If that is tested on a training ship, then nothing would be new. I predict the next design would be the standard model, followed by several hulls in rapid succession with only minor changes between them.

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xsu-is7vq My guess is that this is indeed that path. The Chines are known to be working on a nuclear power plant of a size capable of meeting the needs of a carrier and I assume that their carrier tech is likely on par with US other than the nuclear plant.

    • @williamblomster2387
      @williamblomster2387 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@georgemorris9616 hunk of junk...will never carry aircraft

  • @tigersilberhannes9153
    @tigersilberhannes9153 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    With these experiences and the ones they will get building the 004, China will be ready with the 005 to have a typeship for mass production.

    • @sexgod6909
      @sexgod6909 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly!!!...They learn from everything..No experience is wasted...😀👍

  • @jilidkuminding7356
    @jilidkuminding7356 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    China : Powering ASIA and the WORLD 🌍🤝🤝🤝💪💖

    • @jonronaldflores3007
      @jonronaldflores3007 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China: stealing exclusive economic zones and building fake islands in the west philippine sea stirring trouble in asia and the world

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ??? How is China Powering ?

  • @cabasadefogo9533
    @cabasadefogo9533 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Stunning beauty! Go PLAN!

  • @titusc.4482
    @titusc.4482 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    祖国万岁

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everyone stand for the American National Anthem .. Any other countries want to get in on this ?? 😀

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Long Live the Romulan Empire

  • @davisho3638
    @davisho3638 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    AMAZING CHINA..... The WORLD SUPER POWER

    • @RectalRooter
      @RectalRooter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can you add more capslock ?

  • @jasonprivately1764
    @jasonprivately1764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Chinese carriers that are using electromagnetic launch are basing their development on a thesis paper of a university student. Again with no real experience.

    • @笑談渴飲台獨血
      @笑談渴飲台獨血 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      可能你是智障。中国航母电磁弹射是由一位资深教授马伟明将军领衔的团队研发的

    • @merrick6484
      @merrick6484 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So?
      The proof is in the pudding itself, not base on thesis paper.
      You should come back in two years time when its out in full operation.

  • @taiwanstillisntacountry
    @taiwanstillisntacountry 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sail top-speed is not easy.
    Ask UK Navy and Indian Navy.
    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1 cant sail top-speed.
    The other likes to cow-towing at top-speed.
    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @JohannJannick
    @JohannJannick 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Indian aircraft carries can not be compared to chinese ptoduction its a long way off...😅😅😅

    • @sexgod6909
      @sexgod6909 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      India is a true THIRD WORLD COUNTRY compared to China ..India only survives because of Western help.

  • @drandersjiang
    @drandersjiang 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Aircraft carriers are for power projection. You can't do power projection without projecting your power haha

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cool ship! 👍🇨🇳

  • @maximemathieu4153
    @maximemathieu4153 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi ,great content . will it be possible to make a video about the south korean kss III ?

  • @horridohobbies
    @horridohobbies 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    With each carrier, China learns more and more. Every subsequent carrier enjoys major improvements. The Fujian is not the ultimate carrier; it doesn't need to match the Gerald R. Ford.
    The Type 004 will rock!
    Still, the Fujian is a beautiful and most impressive ship.

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You have a wisdom that is not common among TH-cam commentors. The common refrain is that "it isn't as good as ours" and the realty is that it doesn't have to be. It only has to be good enough to do what China wants to do. What China really wants to do is re-unite Taiwan, and since the Taiwanese don't actually have an aircraft carrier, it would seem that the Chinese carrier will be better than no carrier.

  • @spencer7404
    @spencer7404 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This is some serious research. Great work!

  • @mdmotaled3318
    @mdmotaled3318 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Chinese super carrier complete well done