He would benefit greatly from holding a session to clarify what he means by "Advanced Aqeedah" topics. Although he frequently uses the term, he hasn't outlined the specific arguments that fall under this category. This lack of clarity can lead others to misinterpret or selectively criticize his views, sometimes even accusing him of holding corrupted beliefs or promoting grave worship. Many people perceive Aqeedah as a straightforward, pamphlet-like summary, so without detailed explanations of these advanced topics, some may mistakenly think he is challenging core beliefs.
I’m a regular guy and I can understand he means the stuff students study at advanced levels. Anyone who has been to school knows there are differences between primary school and high school in the same subject.
Just keep on what you are learning.., that's what the Shaykh means..., as long as you feel comfortable and strengthen your emaan.., that's very clear.., no judgemental reaction please...., we are not the judge...
نشكر شيخنا ياسر القاضي باستمرار العطاء والافادة والترشيد العلمي المعتدل بلسان سهل شيق وادب جم وندعو الله العظيم أن يجزيه احسن الجزاء وان يديم حياته بالصالحات والانجازات آمين تحياتي من أعماق .. ضياء الندوي من مومباي
Masha Allah This talk is very much related to a recent issue in Malaysia regarding the Mufti (Federal Territories) Bill 2024 that is being tabled in Parliament.
MashaAllah alhamdulillah throughly enjoyed this interview! Evenhough, I am not that knowledgeable or a student of knowledge....everything Shaykh Yasir is saying makes sense! SubhanAllah...alhamdulillah for Shaykhs bravery and intention for the betterment of our ummah May Allah reward our shaykh with the best in this l8fe and the next ameen ❤
Shaykh May Allah bless you and protect you. You HAVE TO do some kind of written work like in a book or a series of library chats breaking down the evolution of all these aqida schools like you briefly were doing in this podcast. but BEFORE that PLEASE continue your stories of the prophets series PLEASE!!!
I really think the intelligence of Yasir was wasted on this vid. The middle guy - continously attempting to have some kind of 'controversial' convo. At least the other person had some respect on what Yasir was trying to say. At the end of the day we are all muslim & we should respect each other. Too much is happening right now to gossip, slander & say you're the bad one & I'm the right one - we need to unite as an ummah.
If I have a 30mins, I'd introduce Dr. Yasir Qadhi to the works of ulama of Indonesia (mostly Shafi'i madzhaban, Ash'ariyah Aqidatan, & tasawwuf mostly ghazalian); medieval & modern ulama.
Dr Salman questions were confusing and kept interrupting the shaykh, at least the other presenter was dignified and asked clear questions. Really I think this was a waste of the shaykhs time. This podcast is for an academic audience not for the masses.
I wonder what in the world would differentiate b/w the 73 sects that Prophet (saw) pointed to. All the scholars claim to be living in the end or at least near end times and literally according to this brother there isn't any one firqat u dhaal as of now, as there is nothing important to differentiate.. Secondly, He doesn't say muatazalism is correct but when earlier scholars disagree with them, he doesn't think they should be disagreed with... Another thing, about the hadith of the prophet (saw) regarding the fazail of the first three generations has literally no value in his *Advanced Islam*... والله اعلم
Regarding the “anthropology” of scholarship: I see interesting parallels between classical scholars of Islam and modern scholars of the physical sciences. Modern science is suffering because it has become a full time career path. Many scientists stubbornly hold onto outdated and unsupported theories as a matter of survival: if they admitted their error, they would lose face and might be out of a job. I suspect something similar happened when centres of learning and Islamic scholarship became established in the Muslim empire. Scholars were incentivised in multiple ways to establish their own distinctive brand of Islam within the broader mainstream. Perhaps the earliest Muslim generations were not plagued by these differences simply because they were busy staying alive! Fighting on both internal and external fronts for their very existence. Once the empire was established, however, people had the time and space to question - and even overthink - issues of aqeedah and fiqh. So many aqeedah issues would be immediately resolved if people put their hands up and earnestly admitted “only Allah knows - let’s not dwell on that which was not explicitly revealed”. Disasters like the mass takfir of tribes after the death of the Prophet sallalahu ‘alayhi wa salam, the Mongol invasion, European colonialism, and now ethnic cleansing and genocide, are strangely galvanising events that should remind us to put minor differences into their proper place.
Salafi’s Newer God who began to sit/ depend with a beginning or Older God who was not sitting/ depending with an ending, who’s the real infinite/ immutable God? How Salafi’s Changing/ mutable God can be infinite Allah?🤔
I'm getting tired of always hearing this comparison language in religious lectures. Every single religious lecture I watched, regardless of the group the speaker belongs to, there's always comparison being drawn. Salafi, Suffi, Madhab enthusiasts, whatever group it is, the speaker always directly or indirectly compares his/her group with another group just to show that their group is the correct way of practising Islam. "Some people do this and that, and it's wrong, not because Islam says it is wrong but because my group says it is wrong " Which clearly indicates to the audience that OUR group doesn't do that stuff, that icky or backward or liberal stuff. Every single speaker I listened to, whether in English or Arabic does that petty thing directly or indirectly, and I think it is just funny that all these groups disagree about the most trivial things but agree on one thing..... Bashing each other. After bashing every other group aside from theirs, the speaker has the gall to say at the end of their talk.... "Muslims are not united, we have to unite" Like you just alienated half of the muslim population by alluding to or outright calling them ignorant fools who didn't reach the 'enlightenment' you got and have been practising Islam incorrectly for their entire life because your version is 'obviously' the correct version and everyone else is either misguided clowns or ignorant babies, all of them, the followers and the heavyweight scholars they follow, and somehow you still want the muslims to unite when you are actively attacking them and looking down on them and their intellectual capabilities. Who cares if someone wants to waste their time singing praises of the Prophet for four hours while (hopefully) knowing and believing fully that that is not going to benefit them in the Hereafter at all and there's no good deeds to be gained from that. Who cares if someone wants to grow their beard to the point where it reaches their feet or wear Niqab or wear short Thoub, as long as they're not committing any sins, it's none of your business, it's their money, their clothes, their beard, and they can do whatever they want to do with them, just like you wouldn't like them to tell you that you're wasting hours of your life singing, both of you love the Prophet and that's why you're doing what you're doing in your own way, so just stop bothering each other and each one mind their own business. You both know that Allah is not going to punish someone for singing about the Prophet or wanting to wear something close to his clothes, so why does it matter if that's the case? Entire lectures spent not on the subject but just on bashing everyone else other than my group, making fun of them, insinuating that they are foolish and gullible. Just complete hypocrisy, every speaker portrays themselves as the nicest man/woman around, but when they mention another Muslim group, that's when you see how ugly they actually are, arrogance, pride, looking down on people, talking behind their back, gossiping and so many other sins just on full display under the guise of "I'm not bashing them but I'm just telling you so that you don't become like them“ as if 'them' are a group of hypocrites or non-muslims or something. Just petty, kindergarten level of throwing shade, high-school level of gossip and it's just laughable. Those same speakers who are always preaching about the unity of Muslims and how we should have good character and not have bad assumptions or gossip and all of that stuff, those same speakers are doing the exact opposite of what they preach a minute later, charging their followers to view every other group as inferior Muslims and regard them as like the worst thing that happened to Islam since Abu Jahel and the hypocrites of Madina. Unfortunately the Muslim Scholars of today are too busy making fun of each other like children than focusing on the important things. They are scholars, I'm not saying they aren't, but their focus is just way off in my opinion, and that's sad to see. Instead of focusing on actual enemies, hypocrites or non-Muslims and have workshops on how to bring them to Islam and at least save THEM from eternal Hellfire through whatever group of Islam, instead let's just throw shade at each other and have screaming matches about trivial matters that don't make any difference in terms of reward or punishment from Allah, that's what I call a waste of time.
IF THE FULL REVEALATIONS OF THE 100TH NAMES, THE 5 NAMES OR 5 SOUNDS NOT THERE, THEN WHOLE RELIGION IS MAKHLUK MEANS DID NOT ORIGINATED FROM GOD.. THE 99 ARE ONLY FOR MIND, BUT OUR REAL SOUL NEEDS THE 100TH NAMES AS IT S SPIRITUAL FOOD
He has his views and i appreciate it but there are other views as well which solves the problem of not doing takfir of other muslim sects and at the same time saying asking from the dead is not shirk. This view is, no doubt making dua to a person in his grave to intermediate for him with Allah is Shirk but this act doesn't make him a mushrik or a kaafir. Just like leaving salah intentionally is kufr but that doesn't make him a kaafir until he denies its obligations. The mushriks of Makkah used to do the same thing when they used to make their idols as intermediaries but while doing so they used to admit that they Worship the idols so that they would bring them closer to Allah. These muslims they don't admit that they Worship the dead rather they say they ask the dead to ask Allah on their behalf for help. This is the benefit of doubt which could be given to these people and we should avoid calling them mushriks . Even Christians used to believe jesus a.s as a son of Allah which is a shirk but Allah called them people of the book and their zabihaa and marrying their women was halal but this wasn't the case with the pagans of Makkah. Hadeeth in sahi muslim states that propphet s.a.w mentioned about a janaza where he s.a.w said if certain numbers of people pray the janaza who don't commit shirk then Allah will forgive the deceased... it's obvious the people who pray janaza are muslims and this hadeeth shows that even muslims can commit shirk. Some people used to believe that hanging their swords on a tree could bring them blessings when they go to war, umar r.a came to know about it and had the tree cut down but he r.a did not declare the people who did it as mushriks . My point is making dua to anyone who isn't alive in this dunya besides Allah directly is Shirk but whether it makes that person a mushrik or a kafir if he doesn't believe that the dead have any power to help him directly without any help from Allah is doubtful. We should give benefit of doubt and keep away from doing takfir on people who say they are muslims . I don't agree with sheikh yasir when he says these acts are not shirk but i think calling these people as mushriks or kaafirs is dangerous and we should avoid it . If they are really mushriks then they will have to answer Allah . Even the munaafiks who were clearly kaafirs were treated as muslims because they use to say we are muslims . these people are not munaafiks they love Allah and his Rasool s.a.w no doubt but they are deviants ( gumraah). They are still our brothers. WallahooAalam.
if you can accept so much difference in tawheed like some people negating place/direction/literal body parts/limits for Allah and other people affirming these things. Then why not be lenient on the issue of Sahaba ? Even in the Sahihayn there are authentic hadith which affirm some companions are going to hell which is essentially the shia position that some companions are good and some are bad
False dichotomy, insulting the Sahaba is not a valid difference of opinion Even if some sahaba may be punished, as a collective, Allah is pleased with them, and obviously this does not apply to the major Sahaba whom have been given blessings over us, such as the promised ten, and the Prophet pbuh commanded us not to irritate him in regards to his companions
@@abdullahandersson132 so u believe there is valid difference of opinion regarding whether Allah is in a place , direction , etc but there is no compromise on sahaba ?
@@muslim-g1x No not every position is valid, but the differences between the Athari, Ashari, and Maturidi schools? Yes perfectly valid When it comes to the Sahaba, there is absolutely no comprimise allowed When The Almighty, says he's pleased with them, then thats the end of discussion.
He would benefit greatly from holding a session to clarify what he means by "Advanced Aqeedah" topics. Although he frequently uses the term, he hasn't outlined the specific arguments that fall under this category. This lack of clarity can lead others to misinterpret or selectively criticize his views, sometimes even accusing him of holding corrupted beliefs or promoting grave worship. Many people perceive Aqeedah as a straightforward, pamphlet-like summary, so without detailed explanations of these advanced topics, some may mistakenly think he is challenging core beliefs.
I’m a regular guy and I can understand he means the stuff students study at advanced levels. Anyone who has been to school knows there are differences between primary school and high school in the same subject.
Just keep on what you are learning.., that's what the Shaykh means..., as long as you feel comfortable and strengthen your emaan.., that's very clear.., no judgemental reaction please...., we are not the judge...
Valid question. I asked Open AI/ChatGPT. Helpful definition.
you can watch his Library chats on salafism and ibn Taymia.
نشكر شيخنا ياسر القاضي باستمرار العطاء والافادة والترشيد العلمي المعتدل بلسان سهل شيق وادب جم وندعو الله العظيم أن يجزيه احسن الجزاء وان يديم حياته بالصالحات والانجازات آمين تحياتي من أعماق .. ضياء الندوي من مومباي
Masha Allah This talk is very much related to a recent issue in Malaysia regarding the Mufti (Federal Territories) Bill 2024 that is being tabled in Parliament.
Betul..we should listen to this discussion
Yes. Too bad Sheikh YQ didn't touch this subject much when visiting Malaysia.
Sheikh please write book on this subject.
MashaAllah alhamdulillah throughly enjoyed this interview!
Evenhough, I am not that knowledgeable or a student of knowledge....everything Shaykh Yasir is saying makes sense!
SubhanAllah...alhamdulillah for Shaykhs bravery and intention for the betterment of our ummah
May Allah reward our shaykh with the best in this l8fe and the next ameen ❤
Shaykh May Allah bless you and protect you. You HAVE TO do some kind of written work like in a book or a series of library chats breaking down the evolution of all these aqida schools like you briefly were doing in this podcast. but BEFORE that PLEASE continue your stories of the prophets series PLEASE!!!
I really think the intelligence of Yasir was wasted on this vid. The middle guy - continously attempting to have some kind of 'controversial' convo. At least the other person had some respect on what Yasir was trying to say. At the end of the day we are all muslim & we should respect each other. Too much is happening right now to gossip, slander & say you're the bad one & I'm the right one - we need to unite as an ummah.
Exactly! What a waste of the shaykhs time.
Really agree with this, he just made it a very difficult with his consistent interruptions with questions that had no real benefit
If I have a 30mins, I'd introduce Dr. Yasir Qadhi to the works of ulama of Indonesia (mostly Shafi'i madzhaban, Ash'ariyah Aqidatan, & tasawwuf mostly ghazalian); medieval & modern ulama.
Coming to the same conclusion with a similar journey of the many groups, this is the fitra and sunnah of silence over debate, with wisdom.
Please do an episode on Walaa and Baraa
Dr Salman questions were confusing and kept interrupting the shaykh, at least the other presenter was dignified and asked clear questions. Really I think this was a waste of the shaykhs time. This podcast is for an academic audience not for the masses.
I agree; I feel Dr Salman wasn’t listening to Dr Yasir Qahdi
May Allah protect Sh Yasur Qadhi and Support him on his way. He is one of the stars in the Horizont of the scholars these days
"Goes above people's heads!" 😅💯
Is this a reupload?
Shaikh, you slam the table too much 😹
Hehehe
I wonder what in the world would differentiate b/w the 73 sects that Prophet (saw) pointed to.
All the scholars claim to be living in the end or at least near end times and literally according to this brother there isn't any one firqat u dhaal as of now, as there is nothing important to differentiate..
Secondly, He doesn't say muatazalism is correct but when earlier scholars disagree with them, he doesn't think they should be disagreed with...
Another thing, about the hadith of the prophet (saw) regarding the fazail of the first three generations has literally no value in his *Advanced Islam*...
والله اعلم
QURAN IS BROUGHT DOWN BY ONE MELODY ONLY SOUND OF BELLS ONLY..THIS IS STILL MIND
Never let middle bro talk again
How about doing some lectures to unite Muslims, more fruitful with the context.
I wish I studied under Yasir Qadhi in 2005!
Regarding the “anthropology” of scholarship: I see interesting parallels between classical scholars of Islam and modern scholars of the physical sciences.
Modern science is suffering because it has become a full time career path. Many scientists stubbornly hold onto outdated and unsupported theories as a matter of survival: if they admitted their error, they would lose face and might be out of a job.
I suspect something similar happened when centres of learning and Islamic scholarship became established in the Muslim empire. Scholars were incentivised in multiple ways to establish their own distinctive brand of Islam within the broader mainstream.
Perhaps the earliest Muslim generations were not plagued by these differences simply because they were busy staying alive! Fighting on both internal and external fronts for their very existence. Once the empire was established, however, people had the time and space to question - and even overthink - issues of aqeedah and fiqh. So many aqeedah issues would be immediately resolved if people put their hands up and earnestly admitted “only Allah knows - let’s not dwell on that which was not explicitly revealed”.
Disasters like the mass takfir of tribes after the death of the Prophet sallalahu ‘alayhi wa salam, the Mongol invasion, European colonialism, and now ethnic cleansing and genocide, are strangely galvanising events that should remind us to put minor differences into their proper place.
Salafi’s Newer God who began to sit/ depend with a beginning or Older God who was not sitting/ depending with an ending, who’s the real infinite/ immutable God?
How Salafi’s Changing/ mutable God can be infinite Allah?🤔
Here we go again...
I'm getting tired of always hearing this comparison language in religious lectures. Every single religious lecture I watched, regardless of the group the speaker belongs to, there's always comparison being drawn. Salafi, Suffi, Madhab enthusiasts, whatever group it is, the speaker always directly or indirectly compares his/her group with another group just to show that their group is the correct way of practising Islam.
"Some people do this and that, and it's wrong, not because Islam says it is wrong but because my group says it is wrong " Which clearly indicates to the audience that OUR group doesn't do that stuff, that icky or backward or liberal stuff.
Every single speaker I listened to, whether in English or Arabic does that petty thing directly or indirectly, and I think it is just funny that all these groups disagree about the most trivial things but agree on one thing..... Bashing each other. After bashing every other group aside from theirs, the speaker has the gall to say at the end of their talk....
"Muslims are not united, we have to unite" Like you just alienated half of the muslim population by alluding to or outright calling them ignorant fools who didn't reach the 'enlightenment' you got and have been practising Islam incorrectly for their entire life because your version is 'obviously' the correct version and everyone else is either misguided clowns or ignorant babies, all of them, the followers and the heavyweight scholars they follow, and somehow you still want the muslims to unite when you are actively attacking them and looking down on them and their intellectual capabilities.
Who cares if someone wants to waste their time singing praises of the Prophet for four hours while (hopefully) knowing and believing fully that that is not going to benefit them in the Hereafter at all and there's no good deeds to be gained from that. Who cares if someone wants to grow their beard to the point where it reaches their feet or wear Niqab or wear short Thoub, as long as they're not committing any sins, it's none of your business, it's their money, their clothes, their beard, and they can do whatever they want to do with them, just like you wouldn't like them to tell you that you're wasting hours of your life singing, both of you love the Prophet and that's why you're doing what you're doing in your own way, so just stop bothering each other and each one mind their own business. You both know that Allah is not going to punish someone for singing about the Prophet or wanting to wear something close to his clothes, so why does it matter if that's the case?
Entire lectures spent not on the subject but just on bashing everyone else other than my group, making fun of them, insinuating that they are foolish and gullible. Just complete hypocrisy, every speaker portrays themselves as the nicest man/woman around, but when they mention another Muslim group, that's when you see how ugly they actually are, arrogance, pride, looking down on people, talking behind their back, gossiping and so many other sins just on full display under the guise of "I'm not bashing them but I'm just telling you so that you don't become like them“ as if 'them' are a group of hypocrites or non-muslims or something. Just petty, kindergarten level of throwing shade, high-school level of gossip and it's just laughable. Those same speakers who are always preaching about the unity of Muslims and how we should have good character and not have bad assumptions or gossip and all of that stuff, those same speakers are doing the exact opposite of what they preach a minute later, charging their followers to view every other group as inferior Muslims and regard them as like the worst thing that happened to Islam since Abu Jahel and the hypocrites of Madina.
Unfortunately the Muslim Scholars of today are too busy making fun of each other like children than focusing on the important things. They are scholars, I'm not saying they aren't, but their focus is just way off in my opinion, and that's sad to see. Instead of focusing on actual enemies, hypocrites or non-Muslims and have workshops on how to bring them to Islam and at least save THEM from eternal Hellfire through whatever group of Islam, instead let's just throw shade at each other and have screaming matches about trivial matters that don't make any difference in terms of reward or punishment from Allah, that's what I call a waste of time.
IF THE FULL REVEALATIONS OF THE 100TH NAMES, THE 5 NAMES OR 5 SOUNDS NOT THERE, THEN WHOLE RELIGION IS MAKHLUK MEANS DID NOT ORIGINATED FROM GOD..
THE 99 ARE ONLY FOR MIND, BUT OUR REAL SOUL NEEDS THE 100TH NAMES AS IT S SPIRITUAL FOOD
"I follow all and none" is a very powerful statement ❤
So we all agree that this podcast video is not a good one . Odd , very very odd !!
Salafies believe in the God who’s sitting on the throne withstanding by angels, but Muslims don’t
Dependency is an impossible attribute of Allah
Who said Allah depends on anything?
@@satriasuria877
Salafi God depends on throne, organs
Not Allah
Atheri is saying he is above his throne not sitting
Stop misrepresenting atheri with your philo and greek philosophy
💫💎❤🧡💛💚💙💜
He has his views and i appreciate it but there are other views as well which solves the problem of not doing takfir of other muslim sects and at the same time saying asking from the dead is not shirk.
This view is, no doubt making dua to a person in his grave to intermediate for him with Allah is Shirk but this act doesn't make him a mushrik or a kaafir.
Just like leaving salah intentionally is kufr but that doesn't make him a kaafir until he denies its obligations.
The mushriks of Makkah used to do the same thing when they used to make their idols as intermediaries but while doing so they used to admit that they Worship the idols so that they would bring them closer to Allah.
These muslims they don't admit that they Worship the dead rather they say they ask the dead to ask Allah on their behalf for help.
This is the benefit of doubt which could be given to these people and we should avoid calling them mushriks .
Even Christians used to believe jesus a.s as a son of Allah which is a shirk but Allah called them people of the book and their zabihaa and marrying their women was halal but this wasn't the case with the pagans of Makkah.
Hadeeth in sahi muslim states that propphet s.a.w mentioned about a janaza where he s.a.w said if certain numbers of people pray the janaza who don't commit shirk then Allah will forgive the deceased...
it's obvious the people who pray janaza are muslims and this hadeeth shows that even muslims can commit shirk.
Some people used to believe that hanging their swords on a tree could bring them blessings when they go to war, umar r.a came to know about it and had the tree cut down but he r.a did not declare the people who did it as mushriks .
My point is making dua to anyone who isn't alive in this dunya besides Allah directly
is Shirk but whether it makes that person a mushrik or a kafir if he doesn't believe that the dead have any power to help him directly without any help from Allah is doubtful.
We should give benefit of doubt and keep away from doing takfir on people who say they are muslims .
I don't agree with sheikh yasir when he says these acts are not shirk but i think calling these people as mushriks or kaafirs is dangerous and we should avoid it .
If they are really mushriks then they will have to answer Allah .
Even the munaafiks who were clearly kaafirs were treated as muslims because they use to say we are muslims .
these people are not munaafiks they love Allah and his Rasool s.a.w no doubt but they are deviants ( gumraah).
They are still our brothers.
WallahooAalam.
You should watch the 3 hour lecture by him titled: On the Najdi Dawah. He goes into why he believes it is not shirk and other topics pertaining to it.
@@kingtobs3460 to be fair he still says that some of it is haram and at least a step close to shirk
if you can accept so much difference in tawheed like some people negating place/direction/literal body parts/limits for Allah and other people affirming these things. Then why not be lenient on the issue of Sahaba ? Even in the Sahihayn there are authentic hadith which affirm some companions are going to hell which is essentially the shia position that some companions are good and some are bad
False dichotomy, insulting the Sahaba is not a valid difference of opinion
Even if some sahaba may be punished, as a collective, Allah is pleased with them, and obviously this does not apply to the major Sahaba whom have been given blessings over us, such as the promised ten, and the Prophet pbuh commanded us not to irritate him in regards to his companions
@@abdullahandersson132 so u believe there is valid difference of opinion regarding whether Allah is in a place , direction , etc but there is no compromise on sahaba ?
if u think a sunni group affirms literal jism and literal body parts then yoou dont have ilm
@@muslim-g1x No not every position is valid, but the differences between the Athari, Ashari, and Maturidi schools? Yes perfectly valid
When it comes to the Sahaba, there is absolutely no comprimise allowed
When The Almighty, says he's pleased with them, then thats the end of discussion.
@@abdullahandersson132 do you consider yasir qadhi to be a genuine athari
He follows Mohamed Abdu and Rashid rida who introduced secular Islam
That is false.