Watch as the crowd at the Prudential Center in Newark throws debris onto the ice after a New Jersey Devils' goal is overturned for the third time in the game against the Toronto Maple Leafs.
That would have been a funny and clever thing to do but Jersey fans are not that smart to come up with that lol. Instead they figured -well my team cant score a legal goal tonight so what the heck I will just toss my $15 beer on the ice THAT will show the Leafs lol
Refs were actually good though... called no goal on the ice on both goalie interference calls, and got them right, and the kick was reviewed and by the rules overturned, even though I don't agree with that rule, it is the rule sadly.
@@okyouknowwhatever I think what was infuriating/confusing was the fact that it deflected off the defenceman's skate. I figured a kick -> deflection -> goal would count until I googled the whole rule. It's an uncommon occurrence. They usually get kicked straight into the net.
Three goals overturned in one match is really something I never witnessed in my whole life. BUT seeing the Toronto players and staff leaving the bench because of some debris thrown on the ice, astoneshes me as well.
@@ajiboy1919 could be. It still sounds odd to me, but I have to say I am european and here we are probably more used to this kind of gestures (nothing dangerous) because of referees, players,..
@@ivanduc72 Nothing dangerous? You think a full can of beer being thrown from the stands is nothing dangerous? They went where they couldn't be hit for a reason, dullard.
I am surprised that this is not called a bench minor on the devils. I remember the flyers were assessed a bench minor in a playoff games because the fans were throwing bracelets (I think it was for memorial of some events prior to the game) onto the ice.
lol…well, do you think the officials will have the balls to call another penalty vs the fans? After those disallowed goals? I mean the no goals were legit, but do you really want to throw more fuel to the fire? The refs made that decision not to hand a bench minor and just let the game end.
@@kylorenjr1236 They should, especially when the maple leafs player are actually into the dressing room. Not to mention even Lindy Ruff was signaling them to stop throwing beers or others on the ice.
Ok here is the rule on this. Rule 49 - Kicking 49.1 Kicking - The action of a player deliberately using his skate(s) with a kicking motion to propel the puck or to contact an opponent. 49.2 Goals - Kicking the puck shall be permitted in all zones. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who uses a distinct kicking motion to propel the puck into the net with his skate/foot. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official. A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player’s skate who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal. A puck that is directed into the net by an attacking player’s skate shall be a legitimate goal as long as no distinct kicking motion is evident. The following should clarify deflections following a kicked puck that enters the goal: (i) A kicked puck that deflects off the body of any player of either team (including the goalkeeper) shall be ruled no goal. (ii) A kicked puck that deflects off the stick of any player (excluding the goalkeeper’s stick) shall be ruled a good goal. (iii) A goal will be allowed when an attacking player kicks the puck and the puck deflects off his own stick and then into the net. (iv) A goal will be allowed when a puck enters the goal after deflecting off an attacking player’s skate or deflects off his skate while he is in the process of stopping. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks any equipment (stick, glove, helmet, etc.) at the puck, including kicking the blade of his own stick, causing the puck to cross the goal line.
If it’s a rule, then so be it. But that rule needs to change. It needs to be a distinct kicking motion TOWARDS the goal line. That puck was definitely kicked back into play, as in AWAY from the goal. If you’re allowed to pass the puck with your foot, it should be allowed to deflect off of a skate…
@@justindecker9282 so did you just choose not read " A goal cannot be scored by by an an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official." It was kicked them deflected off of a Leafs player. Who never gained possession
@@EweCantHandletheTruth yeah you nailed it. He was kicking this toward the neutral zone not toward the net and pinballed off of a Leaf pad and a Leaf skate into the net. Rule needs to change for sure.
It was a kick, but it went off a leafs player. It was not intended to go in he was just trying to kick it over to Nathan Bastian. I think it should have been a goal then
@@LD_9 I've seen this happen multiple times before, it doesn't matter if it goes of a defending player. I still think that's kind of stupid though and I'm a leafs fan
@@xXToxicFeedsXx I still think that what the fans in attendance did was not the right thing at all. Still kinda mad that they disallowed 3 though. Whatever, still a good season so far 👍
The worst part about being a Devils fan and actually winning is all the bandwagon fans that dont normally follow hockey and just come to games expecting everything to go their way and when it doesnt that means it's time to riot
@@johanlopez8654 We actually would have justification considering the Leafs and playoffs, and we still don't do it. NJ loses 1 game in 14 and has a meltdown. These aren't hockey fans.
@@wwjohnnymaydo we are against the refs only making the right calls against the same teams. Everyone knows every league has its darling teams that make the exact same plays and nothing. STOP PLAYING STUPID...it's embarrasing.
@@transws6am which of the 3 goals was improperly reversed? Can you show me a goal toronto scored against another team that should have been reversed but wasn't?
since nobody got hurt, i'll say it: this is kinda awesome from a statistical standpoint. has this ever happened before? three no goals in a row? i remember the bolts had two in a row disallowed last year against the cats
I can attest to that, still felt crappy after the game. Honestly I didn’t think we’d see another game with multiple goals disallowed. That’s a dang-it in of itself
I've no sympathy at all for the Devils fans in this situation. The rules are the rules, and in tha case that all 3 goals scored were done illegally, that's what they have to deal with. They behaved like children in this situation.
It’s such an unfortunate no goal call… it’s definitely correct though. What really gets me is that if the Leafs player weren’t there to redirect it, the second attacker would have had it. Saved by accidentally putting the goal in your own net.
im sure they looked at it closely and know better than i do, but i have trouble seeing that it definitely didnt hit haulas stick after the kick.. looks like it did go under it though
For people saying the third goal shouldn't count bc of the rule why didn't the second goal count because there is a rule that if a player makes incidental contact with the goalie outside the crease it's a goal
@@aryan-ud1lw no we're mad because it wasn't a deserved win and one of those goals should have counted. The refs based it on their own opinions not the rulebook
I'd be ashamed if I was a Leafs fan: Last time the Loser Leafs made it to the Finals, you could buy a Corvette Stingray for around 4K and purchase a 3-bedroom bungalow in Tranna for around 25K. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
People do, and hitting the jerseys are really just a childish attempt. Like c’mon mate this isint the point of this and really the jersey jersey’s do have good desgin like most nhl jerseys
Funny thing is that it would have been tied if any of them were called XD I’m still very happy with this, but yeah. This ain’t bottlegate, it’s only November!
the first one was more clearly GI than the 2nd one imo since you could argue the contact was murray's fault on the 2nd one. imo all 3 were the right call tho. 3rd one was a blatant kick
Yeah it went off of the leafs player but he still kicked it. Like if you shoot it and it goes off the opposing player it counts because you shot it, but in this matter you kicked it
devs fans see it like he was kicking the puck to try and put it back on his own stick as opposed to kicking the puck AT the goal. even Dano mentioned it. so there's either zero distinction in the rulebook, or it's a biffed call.
It was the accumulation of three disallowed goals in one game. That third one was the correct call, but you add up all three and I don't blame people for getting pissed.
The song choices are absolute genius. Beatles "Let it be" during the review (let it be NJ fans), and then Darude Sandstorm when fans started throwing stuff on the ice. A storm of...well not sand but.......other random stuff lol. Not the way NJ would have wanted to see their streak end. I live just outside toronto so its obvious which team I support but this was such a strange way for NJ's streak to end. 3 goals waved off in 1 game? Yikes......can anyone think of a time thats happened before? EDIT: And just after the no goal announcement, Beastie Boys "Sabotage" as the NJ fans sabotaged the ice with food and drink + hats. This DJ was on absolute fire that day.
I have a "nothing to see here" reaction to this. I agree with the referees not giving the Devils a penalty for the thrown stuff. They were tough calls and even as a Leafs fan I think one should have gone the Devils way. Yea, the Devils fans were gonna be pissed. I don't think there is any market where stuff isn't thrown on the ice there. It's embarrassing to the fans, it should not happen, but these are humans with emotions.
Last time the Loser Leafs made it to the Finals, you could buy a Corvette Stingray for around 4K and purchase a 3-bedroom bungalow in Tranna for around 25K. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
It's just how hockey is played. Which ever team has the lead in the 3rd, that team will sit back and defend on defence.. Vise versa, If your team was in the lead I guarantee leafs would of had more shots than Jersey. You know how many games I watched the leafs out shoot there opponents like 40 to 20 in shots but they still lose the game. Lol. Doesn't mean they were the better team, it just means they didn't go out quietly and tried to tie the game.
@@thegamersparadise the leafs got dominated it was a lucky win, 3 disallowed goals,2 embellishments by the leafs not called, significantly more time on attack by New Jersey, wins a win but leafs didn’t deserve it
We’re not gonna stop going to games over this game and for you to think that shows how delusional you actually are. Despite the controversy we absolutely outplayed the shaky leafs and literally just beat them a few games ago. We don’t lose sleep over the leafs at all no one cares about your team you guys aren’t a threat to anyone and never win a thing so jokes really on you.
I've captured moments like this in my NHL Video Games, 'cause when you kick the puck in the net with your skate, you know you get punished by the officials.
@@TheKitKatThe no but I've never seen fans complain as much as you do about a team who is second in their division and you are one of the worst winners in the league. I've never seen fans flip flop on their team as fast as you do. One moment they're the best team in the league then the next they are an abomination
The goal that should have counted is the one where the goalie ran into the Devil's player skating by. It is incidental contact and since he was going for the puck, he was the player getting interfered with, not the Goalie. Rule 69: Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact
Key words being "provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact". The attacking player made zero effort to avoid the contact, so the call was correct.
Key words being "provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact". The attacking player made zero effort to avoid the contact, so the call was correct.
@@spicoli3357 goalie interference penalty and goalie interference to call back a goal are different, same way a high stick to stop play or call back a goal are different from a high stick penalty a goal gets called back when a goal is scored and the goalie is deemed to have not been able to make the save due to the influence of an attacking player making contact which was what happened in both cases a penalty occurs when the goalie is just blatantly checked by a player
I didn't think they would match my Pens 17 game streak, but I am pleasantly surprised at how disgustingly Jersey they acted in their loss. Never change...
*"Third Devils goal?" Am I missing something because the score shows they're down 2-0.* EDIT: Nevermind. I just heard the announcer say (around 1:45) this was the third goal overturned for them that game.
I was at the game. The replays they showed on the jumbo are not the same they showed on TV. The ones they showed us looked like the refs were blowing smoke. Under the circumstance the beer throwing seemed totally appropriate. 2/3 goals I agree we’re no goals. Jersey got robbed.
Exactly. They conveniently forget Toronto embarrassing themselves with the Blue Jays in 2015. Leafs fans would riot like Vancouver in 2011 if this happened to them at home on the verge of setting a new franchise record for consecutive wins.
Yeah, but the rulebook states that you cannot score a goal with a kick, and explicitly mentions that that includes if the kick deflects off of another player to go in.
Doesn't matter, if they had counted it, it would have been Haula's goal because he was the last Devil's player to make contact with the puck, and the way he made contact was by kicking the puck, thus it's a no goal
What did you edit out SKL418? Let me guess…your an Islanders fan, which is why no one is surprised that you condone the throwing of liquids and objects onto the ice and endangering the visiting players and officials? Am I close?
Basically the only way this is a goal is if it touches any stick except the goalie's after the kick and before it goes in absolutely no body deflections after a kicking motion counts
No, even if it hits one of the leaf's sticks it is still no goal. The only way it could be a goal is if Bastian touched it with his stick before it goes in.
@@ninetailedfox579121 Seems like there are contradicting rules then: Rule 37.4: A “distinct kicking motion,” for purposes of Video Review, is one where the video makes clear that an attacking Player has deliberately propelled the puck with a kick of his foot or skate and the puck subsequently enters the net. A goal cannot be scored on a play where an attacking Player propels the puck with his skate into the net (even by means of a subsequent deflection off of another Player) using a “distinct kicking motion.” A goal also cannot be scored on a play where an attacking Player kicks any equipment (stick, glove, helmet, etc.) at the puck, including kicking the blade of his own stick, causing the puck to cross the goal line. and the one you quoted from 49.2 contradicts that
Actually, no I just reread 49.2, here is the whole thing... I think you quoted a piece about kicked goals, but you neglected to see that it is only for goals that were not kicked by distinct kicking motion: 49.2: A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who uses a distinct kicking motion to propel the puck into the net with his skate/foot. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official. A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player’s skate who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal. A puck that is directed into the net by an attacking player’s skate shall be a legitimate goal as long as no distinct kicking motion is evident. The following should clarify deflections following a kicked puck that enters the goal: (i) A kicked puck that deflects off the body of any player of either team (including the goalkeeper) shall be ruled no goal. (ii) A kicked puck that deflects off the stick of any player (excluding the goalkeeper’s stick) shall be ruled a good goal. (iii) A goal will be allowed when an attacking player kicks the puck and the puck deflects off his own stick and then into the net. (iv) A goal will be allowed when a puck enters the goal after deflecting off an attacking player’s skate or deflects off his skate while he is in the process of stopping. Parts (i) - (iv) are clarifying deflections from kicked puck that were not kicked by a distinct kicking motion.
Basically, you can't score by kicking the puck. If you kick it to your own stick, you need to use the stick to shoot towards the net for it to count. Even if you kicked the puck to a teammate's stick and it deflects in, it still doesn't count.
Basically if you kick it and it goes in it's no goal even if it deflects off another player from either team. If it deflects off another players stick (excluding the goalies) then it's a goal.
@@i_am_macgyver84 It is though... both were clear goalie interference and called no goal on the ice, they'd never be overturned. The kick is a stupid rule but it is the rule unfortunately.
Third one no goal. Second one judgment. The refs said more than incidental contact. If that's the case and it's no goal, a power play should have been awarded to Toronto.
![[MPD직캠] 베이비몬스터 직캠 8K 'LIKE THAT' (BABYMONSTER FanCam) | @MCOUNTDOWN_2024.6.13](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8qa-nm9bCLs/mqdefault.jpg)
Ladies and Gents, I give you the "Jersey Hat Trick". 3 disallowed goals in a single game.
So it’s not sleeping with 3 of their fans while not being blind folded
@@Arcadeic 💀💀
The TRASH Trick
3 no goals called correctly.
@@ArcadeicI think I can count more than 3 fans lil bro
23 years later and Lindy Ruff still can't escape "no goal".
Facts!
if they just threw hats it woulda been hilarious.
I know, they missed their chance to be epic.
Some did funny enough 😂
They’re not that bright in jersey
That would have been a funny and clever thing to do but Jersey fans are not that smart to come up with that lol. Instead they figured -well my team cant score a legal goal tonight so what the heck I will just toss my $15 beer on the ice THAT will show the Leafs lol
@@MrOasah better than ya team tho 😮
I was there, and I don’t think I’ll ever see something like that ever again in my lifetime!
You live in New Jersey you probably will
@@bam68 😂😂😂
@@bam68 HA
I was also there, it was insane
Another thing you'll never see in your life time, the Leafs winning a cup!
I haven't seen this degree of rink-rage since "Sean Avery Appreciation Night" 😢
Lol
I was there too. Sooo much mascara and blush all over the ice!!!!!!!
I was there, never saw anything like that. Everyone was absolutely pissed at the refs
Refs were actually good though... called no goal on the ice on both goalie interference calls, and got them right, and the kick was reviewed and by the rules overturned, even though I don't agree with that rule, it is the rule sadly.
@@steved8714 never said they weren't but everyone was pissed
Imagine thinking you're allowed to soccer kick pucks into the net. 🙄
@@okyouknowwhatever I think what was infuriating/confusing was the fact that it deflected off the defenceman's skate. I figured a kick -> deflection -> goal would count until I googled the whole rule. It's an uncommon occurrence. They usually get kicked straight into the net.
@@okyouknowwhatever it bounced off his skate and 3 other sticks but okay
Three goals overturned in one match is really something I never witnessed in my whole life. BUT seeing the Toronto players and staff leaving the bench because of some debris thrown on the ice, astoneshes me as well.
Probably because it was being aimed towards them too don't you think?
@@ajiboy1919 could be. It still sounds odd to me, but I have to say I am european and here we are probably more used to this kind of gestures (nothing dangerous) because of referees, players,..
@@ivanduc72 Nothing dangerous? You think a full can of beer being thrown from the stands is nothing dangerous? They went where they couldn't be hit for a reason, dullard.
Shoutout to the sound guy for playing "Sabotage" after the goal was disallowed.
“It’s a hat trick of no goals for New Jersey”
I am surprised that this is not called a bench minor on the devils. I remember the flyers were assessed a bench minor in a playoff games because the fans were throwing bracelets (I think it was for memorial of some events prior to the game) onto the ice.
lol…well, do you think the officials will have the balls to call another penalty vs the fans? After those disallowed goals? I mean the no goals were legit, but do you really want to throw more fuel to the fire? The refs made that decision not to hand a bench minor and just let the game end.
@@kylorenjr1236 They should, especially when the maple leafs player are actually into the dressing room. Not to mention even Lindy Ruff was signaling them to stop throwing beers or others on the ice.
Dude if they did that after what just had happened it would’ve been all out mayhem 😂😂
gonna be one hell of a Dang It's clip
Hahahaha my literal first thought haha
Ok here is the rule on this.
Rule 49 - Kicking
49.1 Kicking - The action of a player deliberately using his skate(s) with a
kicking motion to propel the puck or to contact an opponent.
49.2 Goals - Kicking the puck shall be permitted in all zones. A goal cannot
be scored by an attacking player who uses a distinct kicking motion to
propel the puck into the net with his skate/foot. A goal cannot be
scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the
net off any player, goalkeeper or official.
A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player’s skate who
does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal. A puck that
is directed into the net by an attacking player’s skate shall be a
legitimate goal as long as no distinct kicking motion is evident. The
following should clarify deflections following a kicked puck that enters
the goal:
(i) A kicked puck that deflects off the body of any player of either team
(including the goalkeeper) shall be ruled no goal.
(ii) A kicked puck that deflects off the stick of any player (excluding the
goalkeeper’s stick) shall be ruled a good goal.
(iii) A goal will be allowed when an attacking player kicks the puck and
the puck deflects off his own stick and then into the net.
(iv) A goal will be allowed when a puck enters the goal after deflecting off
an attacking player’s skate or deflects off his skate while he is in the
process of stopping.
A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks any
equipment (stick, glove, helmet, etc.) at the puck, including kicking the
blade of his own stick, causing the puck to cross the goal line.
So good goal wasn't toward the net
If it’s a rule, then so be it. But that rule needs to change. It needs to be a distinct kicking motion TOWARDS the goal line. That puck was definitely kicked back into play, as in AWAY from the goal. If you’re allowed to pass the puck with your foot, it should be allowed to deflect off of a skate…
@@justindecker9282 so did you just choose not read " A goal cannot be
scored by by an an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official." It was kicked them deflected off of a Leafs player. Who never gained possession
@@robharper3111 exactly!
@@EweCantHandletheTruth yeah you nailed it. He was kicking this toward the neutral zone not toward the net and pinballed off of a Leaf pad and a Leaf skate into the net. Rule needs to change for sure.
Maybe they were upset about the concession prices…cause that was a definite no goal 😂
It was a kick, but it went off a leafs player. It was not intended to go in he was just trying to kick it over to Nathan Bastian. I think it should have been a goal then
@@LD_9Get upset with the rule book then, not the refs.
@@LD_9 I've seen this happen multiple times before, it doesn't matter if it goes of a defending player. I still think that's kind of stupid though and I'm a leafs fan
@@xXToxicFeedsXx I still think that what the fans in attendance did was not the right thing at all. Still kinda mad that they disallowed 3 though. Whatever, still a good season so far 👍
@@razzka4097same thing I said to him
3:38- Gif material.
The worst part about being a Devils fan and actually winning is all the bandwagon fans that dont normally follow hockey and just come to games expecting everything to go their way and when it doesnt that means it's time to riot
ahhh so New Jersey isnt a viable Hockey Market
@@TheHeston83 not what I said. It happens to every market when the team starts winning making the franchise look bad.
@@crabbyeric900 yep blue jays vs rangers ALDS game 5. Prime example of Toronto fans acting the same way
It true sadly
@@crabbyeric900 it is true move the devils to Quebec
Classy crowd.
They’re from New Jersey, are we surprised?
@@forrest5549 You’re actually stupid
It's a Jersey thing 🤷♂
@@canadianrage5224 So being from NJ means what exactly? You act like Canadian fans let alone leafs fans never thrown stuff on the ice before.
@@johanlopez8654 We actually would have justification considering the Leafs and playoffs, and we still don't do it. NJ loses 1 game in 14 and has a meltdown. These aren't hockey fans.
Keepin' it classy New Jersey.
Bettman's NHL always has been tilted in his darlings favorites. They never would have done this to Detroit
@@transws6am we are against the refs making the right call now?
@@wwjohnnymaydo we are against the refs only making the right calls against the same teams. Everyone knows every league has its darling teams that make the exact same plays and nothing. STOP PLAYING STUPID...it's embarrasing.
@@transws6am which of the 3 goals was improperly reversed? Can you show me a goal toronto scored against another team that should have been reversed but wasn't?
@@wwjohnnymaydo Which if the words in my post was too big for your pee brain tk comprehend?
Can't wait for Jomboy to cover this
There needs to be a Jomboy breakdown, featuring Steve Dangle.
No, Steve dangle is horrible
since nobody got hurt, i'll say it: this is kinda awesome from a statistical standpoint. has this ever happened before? three no goals in a row? i remember the bolts had two in a row disallowed last year against the cats
Think the Bolts still won that game
I can attest to that, still felt crappy after the game. Honestly I didn’t think we’d see another game with multiple goals disallowed. That’s a dang-it in of itself
@@Bryz0n Not only that but winning this game would have gave them a franchise record for longest win streak.
I mean it wasn’t a goal but I get the frustration 😅
I've no sympathy at all for the Devils fans in this situation. The rules are the rules, and in tha case that all 3 goals scored were done illegally, that's what they have to deal with. They behaved like children in this situation.
It’s such an unfortunate no goal call… it’s definitely correct though. What really gets me is that if the Leafs player weren’t there to redirect it, the second attacker would have had it. Saved by accidentally putting the goal in your own net.
I think it's not very well known that even a deflection after a kick is also no goal.
3rd goal was the biggest no goal of the night, no reason to get mad at the refs for calling an obvious kick, thats the job.
im sure they looked at it closely and know better than i do, but i have trouble seeing that it definitely didnt hit haulas stick after the kick.. looks like it did go under it though
I love how they played let it be
For people saying the third goal shouldn't count bc of the rule why didn't the second goal count because there is a rule that if a player makes incidental contact with the goalie outside the crease it's a goal
The player has to attempt to avoid contact. There was no attempt to avoid the collision
@@cludecat7072 Then why wasn't a penalty assessed?
@@ModestM2 If anything that benefits new jersey with the no call
God Bless you Jersey. Keeping it classy. Never change.
God Bless you Kerry Fraser and Wayne Gretzky for 1993 eh? 🤣😂🤣🍁💙🤡
It's a blue state. What else would you expect?
keep on your kneepads taking the ref's pole in your mouth
I was at the game. I would never throw anything on the ice that’s just stupid but I was furious in the moment about the call .
If you watch the New Jersey broadcast you can actually see the fans throw debris towards the leafs and their bench staff. Stay classy New Jersey
It also occurred when the game ended.
boohoo cry ur panties off hoser if u guys got three calls taken what do u think ur city would have done
yeah they are very impatient, lose 1 game and they are furious, have a 3-3 record to start the season and want the coach fired
@@aryan-ud1lw no we're mad because it wasn't a deserved win and one of those goals should have counted. The refs based it on their own opinions not the rulebook
@@keirafitzgerald6391 Even if one of those goals was counted they still would have lost...
I’d be mad if I lived in Newark too
I'd be ashamed if I was a Leafs fan: Last time the Loser Leafs made it to the Finals, you could buy a Corvette Stingray for around 4K and purchase a 3-bedroom bungalow in Tranna for around 25K. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
So apparently all devils fans live in Newark?
@@johanlopez8654 So apparently devils won a few Cups since the Loser Leaf last did in 1967?
💀💀
@@johanlopez8654 You're an idiot to drive farther than Newark for a Devils game
Can’t believe people actually buy those fugly jersey jerseys
People do, and hitting the jerseys are really just a childish attempt. Like c’mon mate this isint the point of this and really the jersey jersey’s do have good desgin like most nhl jerseys
i think its case of so bad its good like most of the Reverse Retros this year
What is bud talk8ng about, those jerseys r amazing
Dude at 2:28 giving the finger to matthews 😂 😂
As a Leafs fan, I am all for it, you simply gottya do it.
I thought I was the only one that noticed that!
It says on every ticket. For entertainment only, result not guaranteed.
First one was debatable. Others are 2 of the most clear cut no-goals I’ve ever seen. Fans should be embarrassed.
You should be embarrassed that you spend so much time making TH-cam comments 😂
The third one is debatable the other 2 r no goal
Funny thing is that it would have been tied if any of them were called XD
I’m still very happy with this, but yeah. This ain’t bottlegate, it’s only November!
the first one was more clearly GI than the 2nd one imo since you could argue the contact was murray's fault on the 2nd one. imo all 3 were the right call tho. 3rd one was a blatant kick
@@dmacg5520 You think buddy clearly winding his foot back and kicking that puck like a soccer ball is debatable?💀
The New Jersey hat trick celly! 🤣
Classy NJ
Best part of this is Sabatoge by the Beastie Boys is playing in the background
Should’ve been a delay of game penalty
As a Devils fan, I agree, but I'm sure the refs probably genuinely feared for their safety at that point.
@@TractControlOff my thoughts too haha. Didn’t call because they were scared for their safety
I got beer all over me. I was at the game😂. Rest In Peace devils fans
that's hilarious man
Bro I would have been fighting if I was you
@@Shik0njuul934 You're gonna fight all the Devils fans in that arena? Good luck with that
@@ravi8490 devils fans are soft, he could probably take all of them
@@dexlow3577 You think Jersey is soft? Go ahead and test that theory and I'll pray for your life🤣
How many nhl usa teams had thrown things on the ice I know at least 3or4
Hows it feel new jersey?
great we outplayed the leafs 2x, they needed the refs to beat us lmfao
@@tonygarfield364 refs did their job you gotta learn to score legal goals
I get the frustration, but there’s clear reason for all three calls being no goal.
that's the rules
All 3 are the right calls. You cant do that
I’d be pissed too if I had to live there.
And yet New Jersey has a larger economy than the entire country of Canada.
@@ADB358 your Cups wins were a fluke though 2012 proved that
@@TheHeston83 bro theyre talking about housing and economics
@@TheHeston83 leafs fan talking about cups ironic
@@dmacg5520 im not a leafs dude why are you assuming that but I do like Auston Matthews Game
And you have Ruff starring into space as usual.
Yeah it went off of the leafs player but he still kicked it. Like if you shoot it and it goes off the opposing player it counts because you shot it, but in this matter you kicked it
yo this analogy ain’t it bro 😂
devs fans see it like he was kicking the puck to try and put it back on his own stick as opposed to kicking the puck AT the goal. even Dano mentioned it. so there's either zero distinction in the rulebook, or it's a biffed call.
New Jersey acts crowd acts like it wasn’t kicked in. Good call
It was the accumulation of three disallowed goals in one game. That third one was the correct call, but you add up all three and I don't blame people for getting pissed.
@@michaelcavey4393 I don’t blame them either. But they chat at the refs “refs you suck” like it’s their fault. They are just doing their job
The song choices are absolute genius. Beatles "Let it be" during the review (let it be NJ fans), and then Darude Sandstorm when fans started throwing stuff on the ice. A storm of...well not sand but.......other random stuff lol.
Not the way NJ would have wanted to see their streak end. I live just outside toronto so its obvious which team I support but this was such a strange way for NJ's streak to end. 3 goals waved off in 1 game? Yikes......can anyone think of a time thats happened before?
EDIT: And just after the no goal announcement, Beastie Boys "Sabotage" as the NJ fans sabotaged the ice with food and drink + hats. This DJ was on absolute fire that day.
I was there
We didn't see those recaps on screen, and this was 3rd goal denied. The crowd was pissed already
I have a "nothing to see here" reaction to this. I agree with the referees not giving the Devils a penalty for the thrown stuff. They were tough calls and even as a Leafs fan I think one should have gone the Devils way. Yea, the Devils fans were gonna be pissed. I don't think there is any market where stuff isn't thrown on the ice there. It's embarrassing to the fans, it should not happen, but these are humans with emotions.
I respect it, i love to see it
Reverse hat trick!
It was 3 goals disallowed from the Refs people, its a hat trick but instead of hats, its beer.
Was waiting for the Sandman to come out the crowd and everyone chanting "E C W"
You stay classy New Jersey.
Last time the Loser Leafs made it to the Finals, you could buy a Corvette Stingray for around 4K and purchase a 3-bedroom bungalow in Tranna for around 25K. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Just like Toronto fans
@@rickymartin875 Yeah it was a long time ago.
That doesn't change anything about how classy this is.
@@mikes7446 Whatever makes you feel better. If you think this is a good look, not much to say.
Nice for the leafs beating the devils but my god was that a lucky win, Murray bailed em out, leafs didn’t deserve that but a win is a win
It's just how hockey is played. Which ever team has the lead in the 3rd, that team will sit back and defend on defence.. Vise versa, If your team was in the lead I guarantee leafs would of had more shots than Jersey. You know how many games I watched the leafs out shoot there opponents like 40 to 20 in shots but they still lose the game. Lol. Doesn't mean they were the better team, it just means they didn't go out quietly and tried to tie the game.
@@thegamersparadise the leafs got dominated it was a lucky win, 3 disallowed goals,2 embellishments by the leafs not called, significantly more time on attack by New Jersey, wins a win but leafs didn’t deserve it
To be fair the Leafs likely deserved to beat my Islanders but Toronto had a Dangit moment late.TEND THE GOAL!
@SG the 2nd one was literally a goal all them r debatable leafs got mad lucky
@@veritasinvicta8128 shots were pretty even but ya the leafs prob should have won, give aways always cost em
Tbh three no goals is insane
could have been 20 and it wouldn't matter if they weren't scored within the rules.
Its a good call
The LFR video is gonna be nuts. @SteveDangle
You'll have to scrape him off the ceiling with a spatula, he's gonna be that amped!
Loudest "refs you suck" chant I've ever heard
Just when Devils fans start coming to games again this happens
And you wonder why hockey isn't more popular!! Tonight was a good reason why!
We’re not gonna stop going to games over this game and for you to think that shows how delusional you actually are. Despite the controversy we absolutely outplayed the shaky leafs and literally just beat them a few games ago. We don’t lose sleep over the leafs at all no one cares about your team you guys aren’t a threat to anyone and never win a thing so jokes really on you.
"Fans" real fans show up regardless.
@@honkingantalope fr all the people who just jumped on the bandwagon haven't been here for the past 7ish years
@@honkingantalope only Canadians are real hockey fans lmao
I’m sorry but New Jersey fans seem to act like what they threw on the ice tonight. They were chanting fire lindy in the season opener
What?! 😅
I've captured moments like this in my NHL Video Games, 'cause when you kick the puck in the net with your skate, you know you get punished by the officials.
Not Toronto fans acting as if they are the classy fans of the league and that they're above hissy fits...
we complain, we don't defile our arena lol
@@TheKitKatThe no but I've never seen fans complain as much as you do about a team who is second in their division and you are one of the worst winners in the league. I've never seen fans flip flop on their team as fast as you do. One moment they're the best team in the league then the next they are an abomination
@@TheKitKatThe yall threw beer bottles on the field for that blue jays playoff game a couple years ago lmfaoooo
The goal that should have counted is the one where the goalie ran into the Devil's player skating by. It is incidental contact and since he was going for the puck, he was the player getting interfered with, not the Goalie.
Rule 69:
Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact
Only he didn't try to not make contact with the goalie.
Key words being "provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact". The attacking player made zero effort to avoid the contact, so the call was correct.
Yepp. Agreed. Also, why was there no goalie interference called on EITHER of the goals if the goals were scored "illegally."
Key words being "provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact". The attacking player made zero effort to avoid the contact, so the call was correct.
@@spicoli3357 goalie interference penalty and goalie interference to call back a goal are different, same way a high stick to stop play or call back a goal are different from a high stick penalty
a goal gets called back when a goal is scored and the goalie is deemed to have not been able to make the save due to the influence of an attacking player making contact which was what happened in both cases
a penalty occurs when the goalie is just blatantly checked by a player
Weird game, started watch this one because the Pens vs Flames game was too slow….This is the first time I’ve witnessed a reverse hat trick.
Wrong thing to do but devils fans have passion. Love to see that passion.
And people say Leaf fans are the worst in sports LMAOO
Stay classy, Jersey.
I didn't think they would match my Pens 17 game streak, but I am pleasantly surprised at how disgustingly Jersey they acted in their loss. Never change...
Lol you're an immature little boy
The Devils don't have the league to build Crosby, or that goal would have been allowed !!
Lol imagine saying this when we all know Crosby is an Oscar nominee every year.
It wasn't at the loss it was at the refs and having 3 disallowed goals in a single game. Any arena would be livid
Trying to imitate Argentina with their 3 offside goals called back on Tuesday.
you're really pissed if you threw a $14 beer on the ice
That should honestly be embarrassing for devils fans
3 Called back goals dude on a 13 game win streak, maybe not right thing to do but we got FUC*ED
Ima devils fan I don’t disagree w the decisions but it should be easy to understand their anger
@@TMMPdumbasses we?
OH you jumped on the bandwagon eh
Yeah, Cleveland Browns fans show em how to do it right. 😈
@@TMMPdumbasses Every single call was the right one according to the rulebook.
America is such a civilized and clean country
Stay classy New Jersey
Devils fan here - IMHO obvious kicking motion lead to a goal = correctly disallowed.
Jersey fans being just as classles as philly fans. Makes sense tho considering both cities are a cesspool
*"Third Devils goal?" Am I missing something because the score shows they're down 2-0.*
EDIT: Nevermind. I just heard the announcer say (around 1:45) this was the third goal overturned for them that game.
They had two previous goals also overturned, check SN’s previous videos they have them there
They have had 3 goals overturned
The New Jersey Devils have been terrible for so long that their fans stopped watching games and forgot all the rules.
There was two other goals called back so it's the third devils goal called back.
They mean 3 Devil's goals were called back during the game, they only showed the 3rd and the debris coming down..
"The league does not want toronto to win"
🤷♂️🤦♂️
Show some class, this is Jersey
Smart move to sell beer cans.
From a leafs fan myself, it's safe to say we got lucky tonight 😂 damnn
I couldn't believe we actually got those calls in our favor for once!!! I was shocked as you 🤣
I respect your honestly. Was an exciting game regardless of the outcome and I know how you feel. Refs hate us too
that last one was 100% no goal. I have no seen the other 2... red wings fan.
@@kohl4life a deflection off of an opposing player into the net from a kick is no goal
@@cludecat7072 I agreed. it is no goal because of the kick
I was at the game. The replays they showed on the jumbo are not the same they showed on TV. The ones they showed us looked like the refs were blowing smoke. Under the circumstance the beer throwing seemed totally appropriate.
2/3 goals I agree we’re no goals. Jersey got robbed.
When is it ever appropriate to act like a 2 year old?
Why are you giving 2 year olds beer?
Gotta learn to be a respectful fan. Even the Devils players looked embarrassed for what the fans were doing
I’ll be seeing this on Steve Dangles dang it’s lol
That's a dang it.
I guess it is my fault 🤷🏻♂️ - Gary.
I blame Gary for everything.
I blame Gary Bettman for not letting a Canadian team in a Stanley Cup Finals and for not letting any Canadian teams win a Stanley Cup
No defense but people are joking when they think their fans wouldn’t react the same towards 3 disallowed goals
Exactly. They conveniently forget Toronto embarrassing themselves with the Blue Jays in 2015. Leafs fans would riot like Vancouver in 2011 if this happened to them at home on the verge of setting a new franchise record for consecutive wins.
Doubt it after a 13 game winning streak, no excuse.
The Devils player that celebrated a goal he knew he had kicked in, is just as bad as the fans.
Good thing this didn't happen in Philly. It would have made national news.
I understand it's text book kicking motion, but he didn't even kick the puck in the direction of the net...............
Yeah, but the rulebook states that you cannot score a goal with a kick, and explicitly mentions that that includes if the kick deflects off of another player to go in.
Doesn't matter, if they had counted it, it would have been Haula's goal because he was the last Devil's player to make contact with the puck, and the way he made contact was by kicking the puck, thus it's a no goal
Most justified beer throwing I’ve ever seen.
Which explains everything...
That explains a lot
What did you edit out SKL418? Let me guess…your an Islanders fan, which is why no one is surprised that you condone the throwing of liquids and objects onto the ice and endangering the visiting players and officials? Am I close?
Yessir
Playing Sabotage is partially inciting a riot though
Devil fan logic: if I threw 2 pucks in the net, they didn't count, 3rd one has to count.... Or else.
Lol, I think fans are confused here. This is HOCKEY, not SOCCER 😂 Y'all in the wrong stadium bois
Basically the only way this is a goal is if it touches any stick except the goalie's after the kick and before it goes in absolutely no body deflections after a kicking motion counts
No, even if it hits one of the leaf's sticks it is still no goal. The only way it could be a goal is if Bastian touched it with his stick before it goes in.
@@MoonDragn77 "(ii) A kicked puck that deflects off the stick of any player (excluding the
goalkeeper’s stick) shall be ruled a good goal."
@@ninetailedfox579121 Seems like there are contradicting rules then:
Rule 37.4:
A “distinct kicking motion,” for purposes of Video Review, is one where the video makes clear that an attacking Player has deliberately propelled the puck with a kick of his foot or skate and the puck subsequently enters the net. A goal cannot be scored on a play where an attacking Player propels the puck with his skate into the net (even by means of a subsequent deflection off of another Player) using a “distinct kicking motion.” A goal also cannot be scored on a play where an attacking Player kicks any equipment (stick, glove, helmet, etc.) at the puck, including kicking the blade of his own stick, causing the puck to cross the goal line.
and the one you quoted from 49.2 contradicts that
Actually, no I just reread 49.2, here is the whole thing... I think you quoted a piece about kicked goals, but you neglected to see that it is only for goals that were not kicked by distinct kicking motion:
49.2:
A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who uses a distinct kicking motion to propel the puck into the net with his skate/foot.
A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official.
A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player’s skate who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal. A puck that is directed into the net by an attacking player’s skate shall be a legitimate goal as long as no distinct kicking motion is evident.
The following should clarify deflections following a kicked puck that enters the goal:
(i) A kicked puck that deflects off the body of any player of either team (including the goalkeeper) shall be ruled no goal.
(ii) A kicked puck that deflects off the stick of any player (excluding the goalkeeper’s stick) shall be ruled a good goal.
(iii) A goal will be allowed when an attacking player kicks the puck and the puck deflects off his own stick and then into the net.
(iv) A goal will be allowed when a puck enters the goal after deflecting off an attacking player’s skate or deflects off his skate while he is in the
process of stopping.
Parts (i) - (iv) are clarifying deflections from kicked puck that were not kicked by a distinct kicking motion.
Basically, you can't score by kicking the puck. If you kick it to your own stick, you need to use the stick to shoot towards the net for it to count. Even if you kicked the puck to a teammate's stick and it deflects in, it still doesn't count.
Thank GOD I wasn't able to take my niece and nephew to this game. Would have been their first NHL game too.
No surprise that we are talking about your niece and nephew...it's obvious that you don't get laid.
@@Yoseman1 Here is your participation trophy for making comments. Nice of you to insult your own fanbase.
@@AbhishekSingh-qv1dy You insulted your own fan base first guy...I'm simply defending them.
lol i was at thiss game, it was so fun
@@yurur325 I'm sure it was fun, just not safe with the crowd throwing stuff, especially for kids
ending the streak is great 👍🏻
i actually got so mad when people were throwing cups and food on the ice
anyone able to explain the kicking rule to me? he kicked it yes but it deflected off the toronto player
Basically if you kick it and it goes in it's no goal even if it deflects off another player from either team. If it deflects off another players stick (excluding the goalies) then it's a goal.
@@BoredDan7 Ah gotcha, thank you.
Classy
Lol the worst thing is all 3 goals were goals that would be turned back in any game that was just brutal luck
That is not true at all.
Lol the 1st maybe the other 2 absolutely no goals
@@i_am_macgyver84 It is though... both were clear goalie interference and called no goal on the ice, they'd never be overturned. The kick is a stupid rule but it is the rule unfortunately.
Third one no goal. Second one judgment. The refs said more than incidental contact. If that's the case and it's no goal, a power play should have been awarded to Toronto.
what a 0 iq take...
That was clear kicking motion..
Good calls by referee's