@@gedeuchnixan3830 he is talking about that most of the pokemons based on real life animals, and most of the pals based on the real life animals, fox is fox anywhere, and creature based on fox gonna look like fox, creature based on hedgehog gonna look like hedgehog. GameFreak and the company that made Palworld both based their creatures on real life animals, and it is inevitable for them to look the same in many ways.
Seeing a fiery fox and going “that’s Vulpix” is frankly absurd and one of the big issues with pokemon fans and this gripe. Because it’s a fox… like of course another fox is going to look similar to a pokemon also based on a fox… and the second one is a horse so of course it looks like a horse. Despite pokemon fans beliefs to the contrary pokemon doesn’t own animals.
Yeah also they said that pokemon does inspire some designs but alot of things are based on the same stuff like oh no look it's a bipedal rabbit that scorbunny it's based on the same stuff
@taylorhewson8995 the guy had the number 1 argument for where the actual inspiration for these pals come from, he said lucario is an anubis which is 100 percent correct and palworld is taking inspiration from all kinds of mythology from Egyptian to Norse
They couldn't think of a comparison for the deer because they don't have Norse mythology on thier mind, you could say it's a rip off of valhiem but it's just the name of the Norse deer
When I heard them compare Foxparks to Vulpix I thought 'really?' Foxparks has a flame on the tip of its tail. It's a more literal Fire Fox than any Pokémon.
I can see many Pokemon comparisons, but the fact many do not immediately recognize the lack of hair curls or multiple curly tails and just compare it to Vulpix is absurd. What do you think is the most recognizable elemental monster of myth than a Fire Fox?
Bro actually looked at a hedgehog and said "yep, shaymin". This is straight up a "pokemon owns actual animals" moment. Also apparently Nintendo also owns half of the word "incinerate", I hope the Webster English dictionary is paying proper royalties.
I actually wouldn’t be surprised if Nintendo tried to copyright an actual word from the dictionary, like what that one TH-cam channel tried to do with the word “react”.
People screaming about palworld copied pokemon designs But completely forgetting that pokemon did in fact copied some monsters designs from dragon quest
The image you are refering to thats being tossed around is quite literally a meme that was created by the dragon quest community to mock people who say this. Please look at the images and tell me how stylizing a design to fit into your own world is copying. Especially when the comparisons look practically nothing alike. Im sorry, but I genuinly hate that this is being thrown around as if its the truth. It simply isnt. And you are being incredibly dishonest if you keep up this misinformation people toss around like its candy. Like seriously, Pokemon Vs palworld has actual comparisons cause some of the model parts are honest to god rips from the original models and added onto other models. Dragonquest has a bat with a super derpy face. Pokemon has a bat thats supposed to look more realistic. The evolved form has a giant mouth. The "evolved" form of the bat in Dragonquest does not. And lets bring Caterpie into this as well as a great example real quick: The two sprites look nothing alike but the colors. This is like as if you said that an anime copied Dogs IRL because the dog in the anime is still a dog. Yea its a dog. Yes its the breed. Does it look in any way shape or form realistic to you? No? There you go.
@@GikamesShadow who fucking cares if pocket pair borrowed some fitures from different pokemons The game is still fun and addicting, have mixed together so many good ideas from different games, And the world of is just feel so much more alive and adventure inspiring than a god forbid scarlet and violet Plus you have to agree that some pals do look a lot better then pokemons that they borrowed fitures from
But thats the standard thing said, especially coming from Pokemon elitists who want to trash talk this game and gaslight that Nintendo will sue. 1. Nintendo knows of this game for over 3 years from many appeareances on especially japanese game conventions. Nintendo shut down the Palworld Pokemon mod that was being sold by someone in 24 hours. 2. Nintento already is copying animals in the first place, i dont see the whole earth suing nintento for plagiarizing animals in their game. You can see the resemblence, but you cant just say its ripping off Pokemon considering Pokemon was already copying, making a mix of animals with popular monsters from games at the times the first pokemon was made. In fact a lot of the pokemons are so hugely inspired by other works and real animalst that i think the only pokemon trademarked by nintendo is pikachu.
@@shineek Ever heard of the animal called pika? Even pikachu is inspired by an irl animal, either a pika or (this one was confirmed, iirc) a squirrel. So yeah... Pikachu might be trademarked, but not because of the animal + type combination.
Alternative title: How many reaches can I make to say Palworld copied Pokemon? Pokemon copied Dragon Quest, Pokemon copied Digimon, Palworld did not copy Pokemon. They don't own animals, they don't own elements, they don't own mythology, and they don't own cutesy art styles. I've been a Pokemon and Digimon fan since I was a kid yet I can see this. It's wild the reaches Nintendroids make, my gosh...
Wow, it's almost like they both have creatures based on real animals or even mythology! "Oh, well we cant have a hedgehog based creature because Pokemon did it first!" Thats so stupid honestly
Yeah I was waiting for them to mention Electabuzz after mis-comparing it to Pikachu and I was so 'Huh!?'. Suppose they were just focused on the 'mascot' state of Grizzbolt perhaps?
@@Lupirio23 if you want to compare them then your brain will do so even if they are not that alike at all If we want a true compare we need a person who doesn't know pokemon at all or knows very little about it! Cuz he wouldn't randomly try to match them for no reason
@@MrBenjamintehMy Electric Neighbour Totoro is kind of the meme for Grizzbolt. I've even seen fan art in the steams community with the umbrella scene.
I still don't see how Foxparks is simillar to volpix other than them both being well y'know FOX!? maybe?? I mean Foxparks is literally a fox on fire!? How's that simillart to Volpix!?
Gen1 was a world wide phenomenon so easy association even for bigger leaps. Firefox is Norse mythology originally AFAIK. And Palworld really uses the same art style for Pals. Though Foxparks is quite a different design on the same concept. Cremis though... that's not not-seeable XD
Honestly, for a lot of the Pals, you would have to nitpick to call a given Pal "plagiarized". Lucario doesn't really look like Anubis. Like if you were a judge for which one looked more like it belonged in an Egyptian mythology themed game, would you seriously pick Lucario? [Edit] But for real, I love how the devs gave the Pals personality when you see them work and how their status impacts them.
Digtoise's Paldeck entry is referencing the old story about the "Spear and the Shield", which is the paradox of the unstoppable force meeting the immovable object
At the end of the Hangyu video, the one carrying a lamball is actually good as if you have a pal incapacitated in your base, the other pals in your base will actively carry them to a bed in order to recover
I honestly think the whole "they just ripped off pokemon" argument to be stupid. They've come out with over a thousand different pokemon so its almost impossible for any fantasy creature to not look like some kind of pokemon or digimon. At least palworld doesn't have living trash bags and ice-cream cones.
I think sometimes some people forget that artwork can be inspired as well. I do wonder where is the line drawn between inspired and copied. I also feel like sometimes it hard for certain pokemon fans to see a certain pals as it own thing because as how much pokemon design is ingrained in their minds. I believe if another company made their own design, people would do the same thing to that game as well if that company became popular like palworld. Like where does this end.
@@FinnFann I believe that is true. There are other companies that use similar art styles . Which is why you can drawn pokemon style from other companies just like you can see some of palworld style from pokemon.
zthe pHYSICS are so intersting in this. they shot a penguin at the Reptyto and the reptyro got flipped onto his back directly from the explosion under it.
What most people forget is that Pokémon themselves are based on a lot of living, mythical and religious creatures from around the world. They can't really do anything for Palworld using the likeness of said creatures themselves.
Im giving you guys a break, unlike other commenters, because you realized that lucario is just an anubis, as is palworld's anubis, or many other characters from that were inspired in egyptian pantheon
Thing is, make any monster design that is Pokemonish and no matter how Original it is, people will cry Pokemon. The problem with Palworld is that people are approaching it as if IT IS a pokemon knock off. Which if you have played it, it is not. Yes the pal catching mechanics is basically the same and ofc there are some similar pal designs but thats where it stops. Pokemon: pick a starter -Cannot have no Pokemon in my party, one slot always has to be filled (excluding pre-starter) -Turn based fighting -Point of the game is to collect Pokemon, level them up and finish the elite 4 etc. Palworld: You can play the entire game without once capturing a Pal. -Survival based gameplay. -Not turn based -Guns, armor, RPG based stats for the player to level up There's definitely more but another comparison that I also would like to point out is, Call of duty and Battlefield have EXACT same Guns AND GAMEPLAY is literally the same. Now do fan boys run around screaming that one copied the other? No because although similar they both can exist in this world. People who gatekeep and only want "One" Pokemon game to exist must have very bland taste. I'd rather have a variety of well made games and just play and enjoy what you like...
How do you see vulpix where is the hair tuft where is the five tails where is the eyes that are only pupils. This fox is clearly orange, not Brown /reddish brown.
"Flamethrower is the partner skill I wonder what it does?" Well the video showed you like 10 seconds ago. Its when you focus on the wrong parts you miss whats actually important.
Grizzbolt pikachu? Nah, coloring maybe a little bit, everything else is Totoro. its inspiration can be clearly seen as coming from Studio Ghiblis anime.
I love how pokemon fans froth at the mouth when they think Palworld copied pokemons. But then when you mention how pokemon ripped off Dragon Quest, they go oddly quiet.. Could it be that nintentards are just that dumb ? Naaah, couldnt be, right ? I mean surely they arent SO hecking stupid that they would think nintendo owns copyrights to any and all animals and objects and color patterns ? So for example if any game ever has a fox, that is fire type, they think its totally a rip off vulpix and thus cannot be allowed to exist ?!
Anybody else here also "baby" their Pals? I never threaten, much less eat, my Pals. They all get along great. But of course if someone/something tries to invade our camp, then they ferociously attack it. 😂
Ok i think they're not all copies, since a fire fox will always look like a firey fox, and a electric horse will look like an electric horse, and you can't just go Lucario whenever you see a bipedal dog, you cannot say Xerneas when you see a deer with giant colorful horns, and a fire bird is always talonflame... Although......robinquill IS basically decidueye
See the problem here is that Pokemon itself doesn't have very original designs. It's the kind of stuff a kid doodling in a notebook at school would come up with a lot of the time. I'm sorry but "what if rat, but electric colors" is not even close to original or innovative. Pokemon's designs are so childishly basic that its nearly impossible to not "copy" them in some way. If Pikachu pulled out an MP7 I might take the copying thing more seriously, but I'm pretty sure I missed that episode if it ever happened.
im a pokemon fan myself. i see NOTHING stolen and i play this game constantly. palworld is literally something nintendo was just too stuck up to do themselves. its why pokemon faded and became a laugh after all these years. sorry nintendo, someone just did pokemon better than you. deal with it. its what you get for refusing to do it yourselves.
I just hate when people do that. I mean oxpsarks is a fire fox. How you gonna say vulpix. They are based on the sme FUcking animal. like nintendo does not own right to animals. Can you not do that
6:40 What's that song called? I know it's from Pokemon and sounds like a battle theme but that's all I know. Also what's playing around 35 to 40 minute mark. EDIT: Scratch that....all music name timestamps plz.
Did he say grizzbolt is too pikachu???? That's a stretch lol he's a damn beefcake....lol do yourselves a favor play the game, there's no regrets, especially if you like monster catching games plus survival, there's so many laughs to be had
Haha yeah we’ve played since day one, the reason we compared Grizzbolt to Pikachu is because Grizzbolt could be considered the mascot of the game. Even after the 160 hours of playtime I’ve put in, I would still compare them haha
@ColePlaysGames you crazy haha color wise yeah but he has like a gangar facial expression, game is stupid fun though, me and some friends had to start over like 3 times due to the world save curropt thingy but never made me super upset each time was easier to get where we were and just as enjoyable cannot wait to see what comes next lol
its more ark than pokemon lol. the characters just have that art design. some are very close, ill admit but some of the reaches people are taking with some are just that a reach.
they;re not being sued for copyright. Pokemon itself has DECADES of ripping off other monster-catcher games to try that! They're trying a troll patent--- claiming ownership of the "ball capture" game mechanism. Which most of the experts is going to fail just as badly, because it was apparently filed far too late....
"I think of Vulpix right away." I think of another fox Pokemon when I see Foxsparks, although I can't think of the name of it right off hand. I do remember, in the anime, that a group of them befriended a Scorbunny. I don't know why Poke fans keep saying Vulpix. I thought they knew all their Pokes. As for mascots, that could be debatable. I don't think that they officially have one, since there are so many Pals that could fit that role. I think that Chillet and Depresso has a tie in that main lead.
are all pokemon fans like this a fire fox will always look like vulpix and etc like jolthog looks like shaymin just like every other hedhog in a pokemon game and etc
What I like about the Pal designs is they look they could be from 1st to 3rd gen but that´s just our western minds. Saw a video of a japanese couple and the woman was suppose to tell Pal or Pokemon and quite quickly got a hang of it. She discribed the Pal designs as Pokemon with a touch of Digimon design, wasn´t that easy though since it looked like her boyfriend was showing redraws of both and not real images and some details from the real animations are lost in that.
I would say that when using the artstyle thats has been chosen. Considering the vast amount of pokémons and their impact. I bet its almost impossible to create a unique character that doesn't share some kind of resemblence. not always because they look similar, but because the artstyle is deeply connected to the pokémon franchise.
You're just saying regular animals with the same concept of a Pokémon that Pokémon. Vulpix and Foxparks are fire foxes, of course they'll look similar.
Gotta say my opinion of palworld - It is definitely a rep off of pokemon or should i say it was inspired by pokemon and was created base on combination of ideas from pokemon but no hate its good they made it abit different from just catching it with the casual regular nice game both palworld and pokemon.
Pokemon is SO fu***ng done. It need a Pokemon 2 desperately. The combat mechanics are a** and need a next gen upgrade and remake of the whole roster of bloated/ugly/unimaginable pokemon xD
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I now have 160 hours in this game, I love it. Still called Foxparks Vulpix though 😂
It really is hard trying to break the habit of that. I constantly find myself calling nox umbreon or calling sparkit pikachu.
Yeah i will never call the pals, pals but just pokemon
when you're too much of a fan that you forgot about real life animals is just sad to see
ikr, like jolthog is literally a hedgehog irl just made cute
What do game pixels on a screen have to do with real life 🙄
@@gedeuchnixan3830 he is talking about that most of the pokemons based on real life animals, and most of the pals based on the real life animals, fox is fox anywhere, and creature based on fox gonna look like fox, creature based on hedgehog gonna look like hedgehog. GameFreak and the company that made Palworld both based their creatures on real life animals, and it is inevitable for them to look the same in many ways.
@@gedeuchnixan3830Go sit at the kid's table. Adults are talking. 😂
@@cipherdourdan2328 Unedjucated DEI adult wants to claim the stage 😂
Seeing a fiery fox and going “that’s Vulpix” is frankly absurd and one of the big issues with pokemon fans and this gripe. Because it’s a fox… like of course another fox is going to look similar to a pokemon also based on a fox… and the second one is a horse so of course it looks like a horse. Despite pokemon fans beliefs to the contrary pokemon doesn’t own animals.
Yeah also they said that pokemon does inspire some designs but alot of things are based on the same stuff like oh no look it's a bipedal rabbit that scorbunny it's based on the same stuff
@taylorhewson8995 the guy had the number 1 argument for where the actual inspiration for these pals come from, he said lucario is an anubis which is 100 percent correct and palworld is taking inspiration from all kinds of mythology from Egyptian to Norse
They couldn't think of a comparison for the deer because they don't have Norse mythology on thier mind, you could say it's a rip off of valhiem but it's just the name of the Norse deer
When I heard them compare Foxparks to Vulpix I thought 'really?' Foxparks has a flame on the tip of its tail. It's a more literal Fire Fox than any Pokémon.
I can see many Pokemon comparisons, but the fact many do not immediately recognize the lack of hair curls or multiple curly tails and just compare it to Vulpix is absurd.
What do you think is the most recognizable elemental monster of myth than a Fire Fox?
When you're so removed from the real world and everything looks like pokemon
Bro actually looked at a hedgehog and said "yep, shaymin". This is straight up a "pokemon owns actual animals" moment.
Also apparently Nintendo also owns half of the word "incinerate", I hope the Webster English dictionary is paying proper royalties.
I actually wouldn’t be surprised if Nintendo tried to copyright an actual word from the dictionary, like what that one TH-cam channel tried to do with the word “react”.
What's next Nintendo suing Dictionary?
People screaming about palworld copied pokemon designs
But completely forgetting that pokemon did in fact copied some monsters designs from dragon quest
The image you are refering to thats being tossed around is quite literally a meme that was created by the dragon quest community to mock people who say this.
Please look at the images and tell me how stylizing a design to fit into your own world is copying. Especially when the comparisons look practically nothing alike.
Im sorry, but I genuinly hate that this is being thrown around as if its the truth. It simply isnt. And you are being incredibly dishonest if you keep up this misinformation people toss around like its candy.
Like seriously, Pokemon Vs palworld has actual comparisons cause some of the model parts are honest to god rips from the original models and added onto other models. Dragonquest has a bat with a super derpy face. Pokemon has a bat thats supposed to look more realistic. The evolved form has a giant mouth. The "evolved" form of the bat in Dragonquest does not.
And lets bring Caterpie into this as well as a great example real quick: The two sprites look nothing alike but the colors.
This is like as if you said that an anime copied Dogs IRL because the dog in the anime is still a dog. Yea its a dog. Yes its the breed. Does it look in any way shape or form realistic to you? No? There you go.
@@GikamesShadow yeah im not reading all of that, shorter please
And also most of the Palworld designs are just original or like how direhowl and lycanrock are literally both just wolves, same for other animals.
@@figbloppa7183 like yeah just because game freak draw a wolf LITTERALY no one is allowed to do this?
What a load of bullshit
@@GikamesShadow who fucking cares if pocket pair borrowed some fitures from different pokemons
The game is still fun and addicting, have mixed together so many good ideas from different games,
And the world of is just feel so much more alive and adventure inspiring than a god forbid scarlet and violet
Plus you have to agree that some pals do look a lot better then pokemons that they borrowed fitures from
when the pokemon fans discover most pokemon came from other sources
Any ARK player can tell you, something not being a carnivore doesn't make it safe.
Tickle Chicken says hi.
After playing ark for so long Im proud to say I immediately knew who tickle chicken was LOL
Saying mamorest is copying mamoswine....bro they are both copying a mammoth you know from history of idk our own planet!
If anything mamoswine is just a mammoth without snout
But thats the standard thing said, especially coming from Pokemon elitists who want to trash talk this game and gaslight that Nintendo will sue.
1. Nintendo knows of this game for over 3 years from many appeareances on especially japanese game conventions. Nintendo shut down the Palworld Pokemon mod that was being sold by someone in 24 hours.
2. Nintento already is copying animals in the first place, i dont see the whole earth suing nintento for plagiarizing animals in their game.
You can see the resemblence, but you cant just say its ripping off Pokemon considering Pokemon was already copying, making a mix of animals with popular monsters from games at the times the first pokemon was made. In fact a lot of the pokemons are so hugely inspired by other works and real animalst that i think the only pokemon trademarked by nintendo is pikachu.
@@shineek Ever heard of the animal called pika? Even pikachu is inspired by an irl animal, either a pika or (this one was confirmed, iirc) a squirrel. So yeah... Pikachu might be trademarked, but not because of the animal + type combination.
Alternative title: How many reaches can I make to say Palworld copied Pokemon?
Pokemon copied Dragon Quest, Pokemon copied Digimon, Palworld did not copy Pokemon. They don't own animals, they don't own elements, they don't own mythology, and they don't own cutesy art styles.
I've been a Pokemon and Digimon fan since I was a kid yet I can see this. It's wild the reaches Nintendroids make, my gosh...
Finally someone said it
The thing with most of these is they are just IRL animals but with exaggerated traits. Nintendo doesn't own the copyright on real life animals.
Wow, it's almost like they both have creatures based on real animals or even mythology!
"Oh, well we cant have a hedgehog based creature because Pokemon did it first!"
Thats so stupid honestly
I think the complaints is that when you have so many designs that are quite similar, that argument becomes weaker and weaker.
And How is a Gigantic Murderous Bear that wields a minigun simillar to an Electric Rat! other than them being yellow!?!?
Yeah I was waiting for them to mention Electabuzz after mis-comparing it to Pikachu and I was so 'Huh!?'.
Suppose they were just focused on the 'mascot' state of Grizzbolt perhaps?
@@Lupirio23 if you want to compare them then your brain will do so even if they are not that alike at all
If we want a true compare we need a person who doesn't know pokemon at all or knows very little about it!
Cuz he wouldn't randomly try to match them for no reason
I think it's actually closer to Totoro than anything
@@MrBenjamintehMy Electric Neighbour Totoro is kind of the meme for Grizzbolt. I've even seen fan art in the steams community with the umbrella scene.
@@MrBenjaminteh exactly!
You realise nintendo doesnt own patents on colour patterns right?
Bro realy called faleris talonflame like has he even seen anything about the outside world or history?
I still don't see how Foxparks is simillar to volpix other than them both being well y'know FOX!? maybe??
I mean Foxparks is literally a fox on fire!?
How's that simillart to Volpix!?
Gen1 was a world wide phenomenon so easy association even for bigger leaps.
Firefox is Norse mythology originally AFAIK.
And Palworld really uses the same art style for Pals. Though Foxparks is quite a different design on the same concept.
Cremis though... that's not not-seeable XD
Looking at this vs the official game, the pals attack at a much faster rate. Combat is really high speed
Honestly, for a lot of the Pals, you would have to nitpick to call a given Pal "plagiarized".
Lucario doesn't really look like Anubis. Like if you were a judge for which one looked more like it belonged in an Egyptian mythology themed game, would you seriously pick Lucario?
[Edit]
But for real, I love how the devs gave the Pals personality when you see them work and how their status impacts them.
Digtoise's Paldeck entry is referencing the old story about the "Spear and the Shield", which is the paradox of the unstoppable force meeting the immovable object
I totally see that now! That is so cool!
That's also the same paradox brought up in the anime when Roark and Byron battled with the respective fossilmon.
@@ColePlaysGames technically there's two versions of jolthog
With all due respect, incineroar does not own the rights to the word "incinerate"
At the end of the Hangyu video, the one carrying a lamball is actually good as if you have a pal incapacitated in your base, the other pals in your base will actively carry them to a bed in order to recover
It hard to believe when its entry said it was use as an execution tool
Digimon:we not afraid to show our guns
Pokemon:No guns this is kid friendly
I honestly think the whole "they just ripped off pokemon" argument to be stupid. They've come out with over a thousand different pokemon so its almost impossible for any fantasy creature to not look like some kind of pokemon or digimon. At least palworld doesn't have living trash bags and ice-cream cones.
I think sometimes some people forget that artwork can be inspired as well. I do wonder where is the line drawn between inspired and copied. I also feel like sometimes it hard for certain pokemon fans to see a certain pals as it own thing because as how much pokemon design is ingrained in their minds. I believe if another company made their own design, people would do the same thing to that game as well if that company became popular like palworld. Like where does this end.
Also whemn i see two pic togther Palworld vs Pokémon for some of the designs. They do not look like the complete same charcter.
Art style is also uncopyrightable. It's not something you can copyright.
@@FinnFann I believe that is true. There are other companies that use similar art styles . Which is why you can drawn pokemon style from other companies just like you can see some of palworld style from pokemon.
You forgot about the greatest pal of all. The human.
zthe pHYSICS are so intersting in this. they shot a penguin at the Reptyto and the reptyro got flipped onto his back directly from the explosion under it.
What most people forget is that Pokémon themselves are based on a lot of living, mythical and religious creatures from around the world. They can't really do anything for Palworld using the likeness of said creatures themselves.
This game basically asks " what if pokémon was as unethical as people thought?"
“What if blastoise cannons were actual cannons”
"What if you could play as Team Rocket"
@ColePlaysGames Or "What if you could use Hyper Beam on humans"?
"How does Pikachu meat taste"
Aaaaand better!
Im giving you guys a break, unlike other commenters, because you realized that lucario is just an anubis, as is palworld's anubis, or many other characters from that were inspired in egyptian pantheon
Pokemon fan reacts to ALL ANIMALS at the zoo!
Nah they stole giraffarig
@@ColePlaysGamesNintendo should look into that because its gotten ridiculous frankly
As someone who works at a Safari...
Pokemon stole our species >8(. Sue time.
Thing is, make any monster design that is Pokemonish and no matter how Original it is, people will cry Pokemon. The problem with Palworld is that people are approaching it as if IT IS a pokemon knock off. Which if you have played it, it is not. Yes the pal catching mechanics is basically the same and ofc there are some similar pal designs but thats where it stops.
Pokemon: pick a starter
-Cannot have no Pokemon in my party, one slot always has to be filled (excluding pre-starter)
-Turn based fighting
-Point of the game is to collect Pokemon, level them up and finish the elite 4 etc.
Palworld: You can play the entire game without once capturing a Pal.
-Survival based gameplay.
-Not turn based
-Guns, armor, RPG based stats for the player to level up
There's definitely more but another comparison that I also would like to point out is,
Call of duty and Battlefield have EXACT same Guns AND GAMEPLAY is literally the same.
Now do fan boys run around screaming that one copied the other? No because although similar they both can exist in this world.
People who gatekeep and only want "One" Pokemon game to exist must have very bland taste. I'd rather have a variety of well made games and just play and enjoy what you like...
Palworld is not shiting on pokemon gamefreak is shiting on pokemon
How do you see vulpix where is the hair tuft where is the five tails where is the eyes that are only pupils. This fox is clearly orange, not Brown /reddish brown.
It basically a firefox icon
"Flamethrower is the partner skill I wonder what it does?" Well the video showed you like 10 seconds ago. Its when you focus on the wrong parts you miss whats actually important.
39:35 if you throw them in the farm they will find/dig up gold. I literally had 20 of them on the farm for two days and cleared stacks
Every pal based off a real life creature is a “Pokémon”lol use your brains..
Kingpaca reminds of king Dededee I think that's the reference
palworld is much better than pokemon. Pokemon sucks for years now. Good to have competiton
You should make a video going over how many Pokemons are just legally distinct "clones" of Dragon Quest monsters.
Grizzbolt pikachu? Nah, coloring maybe a little bit, everything else is Totoro. its inspiration can be clearly seen as coming from Studio Ghiblis anime.
Ah, no Lovander in the video, disappointed.
I'm glad you're not like most pokemon fans reacting to palworld, and you're actually giving it a chance
I love how pokemon fans froth at the mouth when they think Palworld copied pokemons. But then when you mention how pokemon ripped off Dragon Quest, they go oddly quiet.. Could it be that nintentards are just that dumb ? Naaah, couldnt be, right ?
I mean surely they arent SO hecking stupid that they would think nintendo owns copyrights to any and all animals and objects and color patterns ? So for example if any game ever has a fox, that is fire type, they think its totally a rip off vulpix and thus cannot be allowed to exist ?!
netendo just lazy and exploiting their gamers enough those shitty ugly graphics turn base battle.. this is the game I like to play palworld
This will make the next Pokemon game better
Me after i see the vid:....MY.......BRAIN......CELL
Anybody else here also "baby" their Pals?
I never threaten, much less eat, my Pals. They all get along great. But of course if someone/something tries to invade our camp, then they ferociously attack it. 😂
Ok i think they're not all copies, since a fire fox will always look like a firey fox, and a electric horse will look like an electric horse, and you can't just go Lucario whenever you see a bipedal dog, you cannot say Xerneas when you see a deer with giant colorful horns, and a fire bird is always talonflame...
Although......robinquill IS basically decidueye
it's said like Day dream, but spelled like daedelus, so said the same way,
See the problem here is that Pokemon itself doesn't have very original designs. It's the kind of stuff a kid doodling in a notebook at school would come up with a lot of the time. I'm sorry but "what if rat, but electric colors" is not even close to original or innovative. Pokemon's designs are so childishly basic that its nearly impossible to not "copy" them in some way. If Pikachu pulled out an MP7 I might take the copying thing more seriously, but I'm pretty sure I missed that episode if it ever happened.
It has entries you should reaction
im a pokemon fan myself. i see NOTHING stolen and i play this game constantly. palworld is literally something nintendo was just too stuck up to do themselves. its why pokemon faded and became a laugh after all these years.
sorry nintendo, someone just did pokemon better than you. deal with it. its what you get for refusing to do it yourselves.
warsect is CLEARLY A DIGIMON not a pokemon. KABUTERIMON
yeah pokemons been out forever now and they are like the simpsons when it comes to doing things, ability and looks wise
I just hate when people do that. I mean oxpsarks is a fire fox. How you gonna say vulpix. They are based on the sme FUcking animal. like nintendo does not own right to animals. Can you not do that
I see a fire fox I think of the fire fox I’ve been seeing since I was 4 years old
I get tht but to say they stole and copied from pokemon sis the issue. Obviously youll mopare for tht eeason but come on man. @@ProperGoodGames
@@Omnivoid22 Vulpix
Nintendo lawsuit against Africa for copying Pyroar with their lions when
@@_EllieLOL_ hhahahahhahahahh
6:40 What's that song called?
I know it's from Pokemon and sounds like a battle theme but that's all I know.
Also what's playing around 35 to 40 minute mark.
EDIT: Scratch that....all music name timestamps plz.
The music in this video is the glitchxcity battle remix. Definitely recommend.
@@ColePlaysGames Thx a million.
Hangyu is a noose joke
Did he say grizzbolt is too pikachu???? That's a stretch lol he's a damn beefcake....lol do yourselves a favor play the game, there's no regrets, especially if you like monster catching games plus survival, there's so many laughs to be had
Haha yeah we’ve played since day one, the reason we compared Grizzbolt to Pikachu is because Grizzbolt could be considered the mascot of the game.
Even after the 160 hours of playtime I’ve put in, I would still compare them haha
@ColePlaysGames you crazy haha color wise yeah but he has like a gangar facial expression, game is stupid fun though, me and some friends had to start over like 3 times due to the world save curropt thingy but never made me super upset each time was easier to get where we were and just as enjoyable cannot wait to see what comes next lol
Dragon quest, more im not gonna say
And try compare Pokemon from dragon quest.
Pokemon failed lol I love a low budget studio out smarting pokemon
It's called an indie company not a low budget studio
its more ark than pokemon lol. the characters just have that art design. some are very close, ill admit but some of the reaches people are taking with some are just that a reach.
IMAGINE IF YOU COULD TURN ON BLOOD MODE AND THE AMOUNT OF BLOOD COMING OUT OF STOMPING ON A HEARD OF PENGUINS
These guys were ahead of their time
It was satisfying to click on the like button and see it go from 999 to 1k
they;re not being sued for copyright. Pokemon itself has DECADES of ripping off other monster-catcher games to try that! They're trying a troll patent--- claiming ownership of the "ball capture" game mechanism. Which most of the experts is going to fail just as badly, because it was apparently filed far too late....
So how many pokemon use automatic rifles and MRLS so that there is a comparison? =P
Inteleon
this channel is way too underrated (keep up the good vids!)
Thank you!
16:07 that kids gonna get bullied 😂😂😂
the pals can die die if you overwork them in your base.
"I think of Vulpix right away."
I think of another fox Pokemon when I see Foxsparks, although I can't think of the name of it right off hand. I do remember, in the anime, that a group of them befriended a Scorbunny. I don't know why Poke fans keep saying Vulpix. I thought they knew all their Pokes.
As for mascots, that could be debatable. I don't think that they officially have one, since there are so many Pals that could fit that role. I think that Chillet and Depresso has a tie in that main lead.
are all pokemon fans like this a fire fox will always look like vulpix and etc like jolthog looks like shaymin just like every other hedhog in a pokemon game and etc
Nope, just the fanboys that always come out of the woodwork every time something has creature taming mechanics and becomes a bit popular.
yea palworld said f pokemon and posted of whats coming next@@mikaruyami
What I like about the Pal designs is they look they could be from 1st to 3rd gen but that´s just our western minds. Saw a video of a japanese couple and the woman was suppose to tell Pal or Pokemon and quite quickly got a hang of it. She discribed the Pal designs as Pokemon with a touch of Digimon design, wasn´t that easy though since it looked like her boyfriend was showing redraws of both and not real images and some details from the real animations are lost in that.
I would say that when using the artstyle thats has been chosen. Considering the vast amount of pokémons and their impact. I bet its almost impossible to create a unique character that doesn't share some kind of resemblence. not always because they look similar, but because the artstyle is deeply connected to the pokémon franchise.
that anubis is freaking 40 somthing now
grizzbolt looks more like electabuzz than pikachu to me
You're just saying regular animals with the same concept of a Pokémon that Pokémon. Vulpix and Foxparks are fire foxes, of course they'll look similar.
Pokemon are copied from digimon
14:29 😂
Gotta say my opinion of palworld - It is definitely a rep off of pokemon or should i say it was inspired by pokemon and was created base on combination of ideas from pokemon but no hate its good they made it abit different from just catching it with the casual regular nice game both palworld and pokemon.
i think its pronounced as Aik-thee-deer. perhaps?
Foxsparks looks like a fennekin but darker
31:55
40:58
So biased
Pokemon is SO fu***ng done. It need a Pokemon 2 desperately. The combat mechanics are a** and need a next gen upgrade and remake of the whole roster of bloated/ugly/unimaginable pokemon xD