I don’t think it’s funny to be honest it’s pretty sad. Kramnik is a legend and none of us should revel in his becoming a laughing stock. I ain’t defending his actions, it’s ridiculous, especially in this case in which I think it’s pretty clear his opponent was NOT cheating, but still it’s possible I think that this could be early onset dementia or something like that, I mean it really is weird that he missed that combination at all, let alone be so quick to judge an opponent who found it as cheating. Somebody close to him needs to get him some help
Kramnik catches a lot of hate nowadays. But the fact of the matter is, he's RIGHT. Even though people don't wanna admit it, and would rather hate him, cheating is rampant in high level chess. And cheating is how a lot of players reached that level. Now having said that, he's pretty dumb for implying that Hikaru cheated. I honestly think Kramnik is a blessing to chess, and we need more people like him. He seems like a great guy who's just fed up with where chess is headed, in my honest opinion
He’s right. There is a lot of cheaters, that’s why his approach to handling the situation is so dangerous. He’s making himself look silly accusing anyone and everyone, including Hikaru. Makes him seem less credible.
@@fkdkfnfnldbjdbfjd7179 Spot on! And he's doing it in a childish way. Rather than submitting the games in question privately to the proper FIDE authorities, he tweets and tries to stir the pot. Even accusing people like Hikaru who clearly aren't cheating. Makes it seem like he's just a sore loser. In spite of all that, I still like Kramnik and think he's a good guy
@@johndelatorre4794 Yeah, that's the problem. Whenever someone outplays him, it seems like he just accuses them of cheating rather than admitting he lost. He's fallen into an ego trap. He is obviously pulling the cheating card too often, but I'd like to think that he can still acknowledge when his opponent outplayed him
@@Daelon89 I'm pretty amazed to read so many comments of people who obviously know nothing about chess and can not even realize he's more than right for this particular case ...
There is a video of Kramnik where he does his usual cheating accusation, the funny thing is that Kramnik was completely winning but missed the winning sequence of moves, and it want that hard to see, Nakamura and Dina Belenkaya commented on that video
Do you know the title of Hikaru's video because I can't find it. Also, according to Stockfish, Kramnik never had an advantage in this game. I'm not saying his opponent cheated but what was that winning sequence of moves you're referring to?
@@ahmedm6228I'm not refering ti this game in particular, the game I am refering was pawn ending, the fact Is that Kramnik was so focused in that the oponent is a cheater that he completely overlooked that he could promote fiesta and deliver checkmate, Hikaru was shocked that Vlad missed that and started laughing, but I Will check to see if I find it and tell you the vídeo title
I don’t know the cadence of Kramnik’s opponents moves seemed natural to me. It’s weird that he automatically assumes an IM that calculated an attacking combination that Kramnik admits, during play, that he missed, is cheating. It’s getting weirder and weirder, he even admits he is tired after the game, and let’s face it, he is no spring chicken and it’s not like the IM played a ridiculously deep line or anything, he just saw a clear tactic Kramnik missed! Bizarre, I love Kramnik but his behaviour of late is pretty poor actually. :(
yea it was all fair. It took me not even half a second seeing RxN. rest of the moves looked very natural to me. I think Kramnik is just getting to the age where things get harder to understand. it's happened to top players before.
I have no doubt that you are way better than me but at 2:05 when his opponent played g3 Ke7 for h4 it looks pretty like a computer. What I say is not that the opponent of Kramnik cheated for sure but there is a doubt.
I am from Iran and I watched this game last week. The Iranain oppnent is a legit well known old player. He was champion in Iran 20 years ago, and definitely strong player. Cheating is mainly matter for people who has no title. If you look at oppening, the white player didn't do anything crazy for oppening. The accuracy of white was only 91 Also. I really doubt cheating was the case. Kramnik should learn to respect when he is losing, even if he thinks the oppnent was cheating. He can always report the player and game later.
Неадекватен си! Намали овнешкото, ще спадне и холестерола, а от там ще се нормализира и мисловната дейност! Какво като тоя дърт пес е бил шампион на Иран, да не би света да свършва с Иран, Големия Влад беше световен шампион, смаза Каспаров, победи и нашия Топалов, въобще какво да ти обяснявам, този сайт изначално е пълен със загубеняци, а администраторите нехаят и не вземат никакви мерки да пресекат тази зараза. Лъже се от ниво 1000ело, до ниво 3000ело по тяхната система, видно за всеки нормален, друг е въпроса защо такъв велик шампион си губи времето да играе с идиоти от такъв калибър?
Agree. Kramnik's opening choice was bad. He had a bad light square bishop, have isolated and double pawns. It's very clear that white has the upperhanded after 10th move i think.
You guys debating, ha you stupid idiots are probably not even a fraction of what Kramnik has achieved, if an IM plays with 99 or 98 percent accuracy consistently why isn't he a GM.
Kramnik is just paranoid. He thinks just because he once was the world champion he will be unbeatable forever. So everyone who wins against him obviously must be a cheater.
What sequences? It changes his plan in very complex lines within a few seconds after each opponent's move. Last line was easy for an IM bcs SF did all the previus dirty work
This do feel like a cheater. People who comment about how they also have gotten games with close to perfekt accuracy forget that the longer the game and the better the resistence the harder it is to play near perfect, sure i also slam some 1600 with 96% in blitz in an 18 move game once in a blue moon, but to get 98,3% in a relativly long game with no major mistake is not easy. I also read that all the moves seems nartual, but forget to realize that there are MANY moves that seems natural in most positions yet to chose the best one every time is NOT normal for an IM or GM in blitz.. Not taking on d5 seems weird for blitz. 93% this guy cheated at least somewhere.
I'm sick of this guy constantly accusing players of cheating. I've had players accuse me of cheating when I've outplayed them. It's just sad and shows he's a bad sport. I hope he grows up.
Something you guys should notice is that when you do a game review, the engine analyses the whole game in approximately 3 seconds. This means that the engine does not analyse anywhere near its full strength.
A little unrelated but just something to note, the game review is that fast because of cloud analysis being able to run multiple moves in parallel. If you analyze locally on your own pc it won't be anywhere as fast for similar depths.
@@albertledromadaire theres less then 100 elo difference between them. that means other guy should have a fair and good chance of winning ageinst kramnik. he won classical world championship 15 years ago. thats could just as easily been a lifetime ago considering the new tools we have had last few years to help people improve. kramnik just simply havent kept up since he won back then, and especially when it comes to rapid chess. for me kramnik just looks like an bitter old man that dosent realize he havent kept up with the new times, and instead of accepting it, he blames everyone around him for cheeting. its really sad this is probably what he gonna be remembered of instead of his archivements on the chessboard
@@albertledromadaire 'The dude is an IM with 2800 online Blitz rating. Of course he can beat a former WC who has 2900 online blitz rating. The rating difference is only 100 points
He didnt cheated lmao. Normal looking moves, nothing crazy from his part. The last tactic at the end is easily found at their level. And his time consumption is good : fast on obvious moves, and he spent a lot on important décisions and when position is complex
He didn’t play well it’s as simple as that, and if you either underestimate your opponent or just play one bad move after the other, you’ll lose no matter what your name is.
I'm pretty sure it was in the midgame, when things got really complicated. Especially in very complex positions, it's very easy to make a mistake. So most humans do. But some people might cheat for a few moves when they don't really know what to do, and then go back to playing without assistance once the position clears up.
@@zengarland4421 Also everyone has his genius moments where everything goes well, even a 1500 rated player can have a 98.3% accuracy game every now and then. Wouldn't be common, but it's not weird or impossible.
I would suspect a cheater there too. After f5 (horrible positional blunder i think) Nf4 and so one was strategical winning for white. And the fact, that the opponent dont go for Nxd5/ and Rc8+...a little bit sus
@@ChessKingsTV777 Yeah I spoke too soon. The battery in my mouse is getting low and I had several mouse slips. Now I am clicking squares with Kramnik like it's 1999.
He used most of the time on a tactic which he did not do -Nxd5. When engine showed him the winning move, he was afraid that his performance would look too overwhelming and for a moment he did not know what to do. On one hand he wants to beat Kramnik, on second hand it would look too strong. You can`t beat Kramnik so badly and play so fast at the same time. I am surprised this cheater is still not banned. It`s sad to see world champion Kramnik finding himself in this s^^^^ all the time.
Tactics in this game were very very easy to spot. White always has e4 on his mind. Also there was no need to calculate till the end. Just the hanging bishop was enough for white to go for e4. It happened that everything else worked too, but the rest was too easy, even for an 1800 player to spot in seconds. Besides TT now have at least one camera on. Dont they?
@@AndersonAlves-xf3hp How does that make any sense. You can also mouse slip while trying to click on a specific square same like letting go the click on a specific square while dragging.
I know mahdi and hes rating is 2450 and he is going to be A GM very soon In the game hes playing the main line and thats why hes accuracy is 97 The move that kramnik played and said its a blunder is not even a blunder which shows how he is seeing ghosts. When u start the game judging by the nationality and believing hes cheater from the beginning guess what happens u play for the lose.
98.3 accuracy in a complicated endgame is a strong indicator of cheating, unfortunately. Not to mention that the guy had a +6 score before this game in a tournament where people like Magnus, Naka, Kramnik, Grischuk, Dubov...play. 98.3 accuracy against a 2700+ gm and a former WC is akin to a player scoring 5 goals in World Cup or Champions League final. It simply doesn't happen. In online chess it does? Why? Because people use engines.
@@andro99991 I’ve had plus 96 accuracy in many games, and less than 60 in others, many top players like magnus do t perform well in some tournaments like title Tuesday, while others do, I’m an Iranian and I know the guy, he’s a legit player, I’ve made analysis videos of some of his games. He’s name is Mehdi Gholami
@@andro99991 I’ve had plus 96 accuracy in many games, and less than 60 in others, many top players like Magnus sometimes don’t do well in some tournaments like title Tuesday. I’ve made some analysis videos about some of his games. He’s a legit player. His name is Mehdi Gholami
Specifically in this Match he was playing against Mahdi Gholami he is Iranian IM and is very much talented player and he is not a cheater. Vladimir is right there are a lot of cheaters but he only says that when is playing badly
Hello, I'm not a pro chess player but my rating is about 2000. It doesn't seem to be a cheater. I mean tactics like this you see in 1800 rated games. He's 2850 rated so about 100 points between you two. That means you will not beat him 100% of the games you play against him. Also he created his chess account in 2019. Cheaters usualy have new accounts.
last few moves were not difficult but in the middlegame some moves were critical like at 3:35 rook to c5.it was a crucial move and might be an engine move.
They always turn on the engine at middlegame because openings are all about theory and you can do these moves almost instantly. Problem is when even when you do middlegame chaotically, they always find a miracle move to counteract all your movements. This is when you find a cheater.
@@RedwanurRahaman-cv9mrRc5 seems to me like the normal move, even an untitled club player would do. I mean, you don't have many pieces to improve easily in that position to something useful other than that rook attacking a hanging pawn in active position. Then finding e4 trick so quick because of bishop hanging is much less obvious to me, but still not something crazy for IM level. Then the final tactical secuence would come along the way even if he didn't see that deep when doing e4. Check check check check... not so hard to spot after exd3, as Kramnik himself did in few seconds.
Wthat the ..? Every time he loses is because his opponent cheted? His oponnent even missed a good tactical move,i think Kramnik has serious personal issues
Maybe it's because it's Kramnik, but I didn't see how this could be cheating. The guy's moves were easy because Kramnik wasn't putting up much of a fight. Even I a mere 1700 was able to correctly guess many of his next moves.
I didn't find this funny, I hate cheaters too, and it is extremely frustrating. Higher than 98 percent accuracy in such a fast and complicated game, from some unknown Master and not even GM does spell a cheater pretty clearly, Kramnik is correct. Not really funny
You're right! But what can we do about it? We allowed these private companies and instutions to take over chess and now they get to decide what the current and future chess is like.
I do think that Kramnik is paranoid regarding top GMs on this platform, but this particular game is of course a game with a cheater ))) crazy accuracy and what is more important - when white play e4 so quickly and confidently, they need to calculate everything until Rxd6, Nc5 otherwise black should hold that imho
There is no proof he cheated.. That's not hard sequence to calculate and everything is forced with not too many branches. Even the site agrees as he is not banned and still playing.
@@AKhan0372 site has zillion of cheaters not banned... What is your ELO? Mine is 2420, i am an IM and that sequence with e4 is very hard to find for me in a blitz game
i am not sure whether he is calling the opponent a cheater just because he lost the game. i hope thats not the case but if it is then Kramnik is a bad loser. haha. he should definitely learn to lose with pride
Kramnik needs to understand: 1) He is no longer the best over the board chess player in the world 2) He is not, has never been and will never be the best blitz, bullet, rapid or online chess player in the world. Part of the problem is that his ego keeps clouding his judgement about the strengths, weaknesses and abilities of other players who grew up with massive advantages in chess education that did not exist at the time Kramnik was learning and moving up in the chess world.
@@ADliver4430 Also, people love drama and laugh like crazy when Karmnik says something dubious but he's right as a whole and i understand why he finds the cheating on titled tuesday ridiculous!
@@ADliver4430this particular game ? Because of the devastating moves at the end ? Ridiculous you and Kramlik underestimate what players are capable of I don’t think there is definitive proof only accusation which means nothing unless substantiated
This man looks like a pure cheater. Anyone who plays chess understands how inhuman the calculation of positions is here. The fact that he doesn't make the best move is a typical tactic of cheaters to cover their tracks. However, after this he creates a forced attack, where Kramnik does not even have any moves. Any move will deteriorate the position.
Kramnik is a sad joke. Just looked up MetiForce on the app. He definitely did not cheat. He win loss stats are normal and he's a IM and chess coach. I hope they ban Karmnik for his stupidity.
@@kirokirov-lu8cs Защо ? Не е ли вярно ?.. Всъщност, като се замисля - прав си ! Толкова е смешен и жалък в последните години, че дори коментарите са излишни...
This is kind of annoying to see. Your opponent clearly missed the Knight takes D5 tactic, which a computer wouldn't have. You're seeing ghosts now Kramnik, I'm 1800 rated and I'm sure you'd accuse me of cheating if we played over the board.
i used to be 1700 15 years ago, vlad would literally fuck me up sideways blindfolded with no time on his clock@@kingmo565 i have played against local gm tornike sanikidze and it was like i did not even know how to play chess. and he was doing blindfolded simul... now imagine kramik
This is really rude that at the start he saw Iran flag and said "let's see if I can put a resistance" like he was sure he is going to cheat. If he is too good why doesn't he play in an OTB tournament to see what he will do there. There might be cheaters but players got strong as well like every other game.
Hahaha, just for those who do not understand the accuracy analysis and believe that every low rated player with an accuracy of more than 90% is cheating: I just played a 1 minute bullet game and my opponent won. I have no suspicion that he cheated. His accuracy: 99% 😂(and I even had the deep analysis mode on). Here is the game (My opponent is white): 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Nc3 Nxe4 8.O-O Bxc3 9.d5 Bf6 10.Re1 Ne7 11.Rxe4 d6 12.Bg5 Bxg5 13.Nxg5 O-O 14.Nxh7 Kxh7 15.Qh5+ Kg8 16.Rh4 f5 17.Qh7+ Kf7 18.Rh6 Rg8 19.Re1 Kf8 20.Rh3 Bd7 21.Rhe3 Nc8 22.Be2 Qf6 23.Bh5 Nb6 24.Re6 Bxe6 25.Rxe6 Qxb2 26.Qxf5+ Qf6 27.Rxf6+
There is a problem with cheating in online chess - there is no doubt. Whether this guy did or not - we don’t know. 98.3 for a 3 minute chess match against kramnik is a very high score. But it might just be a game where everything came together for them. Who knows. I’m barely 1000 and I once got 95+ or something, and I thought - they prob think I cheated but I didn’t! All the moves I did just seemed like the right moves. It doesn’t often happen. But I don’t think you can compare 95+ scores against poor players with 95+ scores against IM/GM. It’s a totally different metric because the likelihood of making accurate moves depends on your opponent. I was playing someone of similar level - so not great. Against lower players it’s significantly easier to get a more accurate score as there are no traps to fall into. Kramnik is right to call for a thorough investigation into online chess cheating. I would never get such a score against a 1500+ player. Perhaps he takes matters into his own hands a bit because nothing is ever done about it. I don’t see how online chess from your room can ever be policed properly. Even with camera people can have things hidden. I would not play for money in online chess because it is too open to abuse.
You can actually score pretty high, depending on more factors, like when the bot blundered (or human, doesn't matter). If he blundered in the opening, then all you do is a mop up. Small imperfections (inaccuracies) don't count that much, cause you're still a lot of points ahead on plus. So a "bad move" from +7 to +5, which is normally almost a knight, is still considered good play. Even more important, the big number of moves can consolidate the so called accuracy, given you "slaughter" the opponent in many moves. So yes, I myself got many 90+ accuracy games against chess bots, rated anywhere between 1600 and 2300.
If kramnic himself saw the line after he played the mistake(hindsight), how is it so implausible his opponent also found the continuation? Maybe it's time he retired. Players have never had this much access to training material ever, he compares them to computers...well duh kramnic, they have been training on computers since most of them were alive..
Sure Kramnik allegations are exagerrated But here it was clearly a cheater and a very bad one But to see people who know nothing about chess commenting and "mocking" him here is frankly ironic You're stupid enough to not even realize he's right for this one
I entirely agree, even the cadence of the moves was very natural and it was a simple enough tactic, not some 15 move deep endgame analysis that’s perfect! I love Kramnik, I think chess players and fans all do, but it’s impossible to defend his behaviour of late. Very sad.
Its a pity how people hates him because his is vocal about the situation. He is world champion with hudge exp plus even in his age he can beat Dubov in blitz. Stupid haters thats all. Plus he never accused Hikaru the last one made it up
He is ashamed that IM saw a pawn push in the center and he didnt. why block the guy kramnik you are old now and not in your prime . Sometimes you lose what is the point... you had doubled pawns the whole game and slightly worse position
It was Kramnik’a very poor play that lost him this game. The tactics were simple and K played like a 2100 rated player. As he says, that was probably because he was tired. Note, he didn’t say what his % was.
Embarassing what kramnik has become. Once when you heard of Kramnik it was always associated with maturity, professionalism, respect. Now he is making youtube content out of it. Good job
Kramnik has entered an inescapable loop. His brilliant strategic play of 20 years ago has declined to the point where he makes all his opponents better - he almost forces them to make the best moves. Kramnik's middle game here was particularly aimless. Spent most of his time making sure his own knight never got into the game, refusing (twice!) to put it on a strong outpost. A younger Kramnik would have stuck that knight in his opponents throat. We all decline with age, wish he would do so more gracefully.
Could you please tell us your ELO? :-) Kramnik is not in his prime anymore, but trying to put it on that terms to justify perfect play from a random iranian piece of s..t it's embarassing for most solid chess players. My guess is you simply don't understand how chess works. At a Master level you can really tell when people cheat. You can't really PROVE IT, because 98% accuracy is not a sufficient prove, but that is a different story.
I don`t know why it is supposed to be funny, when a cheater is detected. Kramnik is far above everyone, who is criticizing him. Nevertheless people have the audacity of ridiculing him. Instead they should be grateful that he helps to bring attention to the cheating that is going on that robs the honest participants of their prize money or at least well deserved rating points. Cheating is a big danger to chess and people , who do it need to be exposed and punished.
what cheat? even a noob like me saw the bad position of black since move 9-10. dead light bishop, dead rook on b6, almost no tentative to attack somehow and open the game.
![Gata Kamsky Vs International COMPUTER [CHEATING TUESDAY]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jiTZxe1PV9A/mqdefault.jpg)
Kramnik left the tournament and ended the stream after this game! LMFAO!!!
people now actually can cheat against him as nobody will believe that kramnik is being cheated.
I don’t think it’s funny to be honest it’s pretty sad. Kramnik is a legend and none of us should revel in his becoming a laughing stock. I ain’t defending his actions, it’s ridiculous, especially in this case in which I think it’s pretty clear his opponent was NOT cheating, but still it’s possible I think that this could be early onset dementia or something like that, I mean it really is weird that he missed that combination at all, let alone be so quick to judge an opponent who found it as cheating. Somebody close to him needs to get him some help
ahahahahhaha@@carlkligerman1981
@@carlkligerman1981какое слабоумие . У него IQ 190
У шахматистов слабоумие в глубокой старости не бывает.
Не любит он читеров.
And what is funny around here? You know, laughing for no reason makes you look like an idiot.
It sure seemed like he decided before the game started that his opponent was going to be a cheater. Before any moves were ever made.
"Let's do the procedure" hahaha, more videos like this plz
That kills me too 😅with that ‘ok let’s do the procedure ‘ Hysterical 😅
I’m starting to suspect that Kramnik plays just to catch cheaters and use the block button.
I'm starting to suspect he just blocks anyone who beats him so he won't have to lose again.
It feels like he suspects of cheating everyone who he lose to
@@RpgplayersInc
Do you deny Hikaru cheated Levon in the 2016 candidates?
Y aveces muestra su talento ganado al número 2 del mundo caruana
@@RpgplayersIncbro h get outplayed by some randoms and beats super gms. That doesn’t make sense
Honestly the second he clicked on his opponents name and saw that he has lost to them before I thought he was gonna be like yep this is a cheater
He was right on this one actually
It's 100% a cheater
Bro 98% its so carlsen, obviously was cheating
@ADliver4430 @axelconde529 this is a joke 😂
Kramnik catches a lot of hate nowadays. But the fact of the matter is, he's RIGHT. Even though people don't wanna admit it, and would rather hate him, cheating is rampant in high level chess. And cheating is how a lot of players reached that level. Now having said that, he's pretty dumb for implying that Hikaru cheated. I honestly think Kramnik is a blessing to chess, and we need more people like him. He seems like a great guy who's just fed up with where chess is headed, in my honest opinion
He’s right. There is a lot of cheaters, that’s why his approach to handling the situation is so dangerous. He’s making himself look silly accusing anyone and everyone, including Hikaru. Makes him seem less credible.
@@fkdkfnfnldbjdbfjd7179 Spot on! And he's doing it in a childish way. Rather than submitting the games in question privately to the proper FIDE authorities, he tweets and tries to stir the pot. Even accusing people like Hikaru who clearly aren't cheating. Makes it seem like he's just a sore loser. In spite of all that, I still like Kramnik and think he's a good guy
He's right sometimes but he has lost the plot, he is not playing good chess and if anyone beats him then he thinks they are cheating. Sad to watch.
exactly ahahahhaha he retired and belongs to a different epoch of chess. Blitz is a trash tilting machine even for best players@@johndelatorre4794
@@johndelatorre4794 Yeah, that's the problem. Whenever someone outplays him, it seems like he just accuses them of cheating rather than admitting he lost. He's fallen into an ego trap. He is obviously pulling the cheating card too often, but I'd like to think that he can still acknowledge when his opponent outplayed him
I guess Kramnik would even accuse chess engine of cheating if he loses.
He did in this video I think)
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Poor man he doesn't realize that has become a clown and keep going deeper and deeper in the depths of self embarrassment
@@Daelon89 I'm pretty amazed to read so many comments of people who obviously know nothing about chess and can not even realize he's more than right for this particular case ...
So you mean everyone got a licence now to cheat against him and he can't even complain
You almost got a draw, Drawnik. Cheer up!
*Someone outplays Kramnik*
Kramnik: Interesting.
Everyone is saying that this guy isn't a cheater bc kramnik accused hikaru but that is definetly a cheater
looks like people got licence to cheat against kramnik.
@@RedwanurRahaman-cv9mr Im disagree with Krammik accusaation but he was cheating. Check the game on your pc.
@@enriquegenequilis961 you have the link of this game?
Crying wolf effect. If you cry cheater every time you lose it will be harder to catch the people actually cheating against you.
There is a video of Kramnik where he does his usual cheating accusation, the funny thing is that Kramnik was completely winning but missed the winning sequence of moves, and it want that hard to see, Nakamura and Dina Belenkaya commented on that video
Could you send a link of that video?
@@coltrix0 Nakamura has in his channel, I dont know how to send the link with the phone, but clearly Kramnik missed the win
It was actually a really simple miss too. Something someone way below his level would have seen.
Do you know the title of Hikaru's video because I can't find it. Also, according to Stockfish, Kramnik never had an advantage in this game. I'm not saying his opponent cheated but what was that winning sequence of moves you're referring to?
@@ahmedm6228I'm not refering ti this game in particular, the game I am refering was pawn ending, the fact Is that Kramnik was so focused in that the oponent is a cheater that he completely overlooked that he could promote fiesta and deliver checkmate, Hikaru was shocked that Vlad missed that and started laughing, but I Will check to see if I find it and tell you the vídeo title
I don’t know the cadence of Kramnik’s opponents moves seemed natural to me. It’s weird that he automatically assumes an IM that calculated an attacking combination that Kramnik admits, during play, that he missed, is cheating. It’s getting weirder and weirder, he even admits he is tired after the game, and let’s face it, he is no spring chicken and it’s not like the IM played a ridiculously deep line or anything, he just saw a clear tactic Kramnik missed! Bizarre, I love Kramnik but his behaviour of late is pretty poor actually. :(
yea it was all fair. It took me not even half a second seeing RxN. rest of the moves looked very natural to me. I think Kramnik is just getting to the age where things get harder to understand. it's happened to top players before.
@@SweetJP. It's not age, it's competition.
@@ItIsYouAreNotYour splitting hairs mate. It’s probably both…
Why do you love him though? He's a paranoid, old, jealous man
I have no doubt that you are way better than me but at 2:05 when his opponent played g3 Ke7 for h4 it looks pretty like a computer. What I say is not that the opponent of Kramnik cheated for sure but there is a doubt.
I am from Iran and I watched this game last week. The Iranain oppnent is a legit well known old player. He was champion in Iran 20 years ago, and definitely strong player. Cheating is mainly matter for people who has no title. If you look at oppening, the white player didn't do anything crazy for oppening. The accuracy of white was only 91 Also. I really doubt cheating was the case. Kramnik should learn to respect when he is losing, even if he thinks the oppnent was cheating. He can always report the player and game later.
100% agree. The tactics are not too difficult to spot. I could spot them in a slow game. an IM could spot them in a blitz game.
Неадекватен си! Намали овнешкото, ще спадне и холестерола, а от там ще се нормализира и мисловната дейност! Какво като тоя дърт пес е бил шампион на Иран, да не би света да свършва с Иран, Големия Влад беше световен шампион, смаза Каспаров, победи и нашия Топалов, въобще какво да ти обяснявам, този сайт изначално е пълен със загубеняци, а администраторите нехаят и не вземат никакви мерки да пресекат тази зараза. Лъже се от ниво 1000ело, до ниво 3000ело по тяхната система, видно за всеки нормален, друг е въпроса защо такъв велик шампион си губи времето да играе с идиоти от такъв калибър?
what do you mean? this iran player is 20 years old
Wtf r u talking about? It's a young cheater.
Hans Niemann cheated and he’s a GM. You have no clue what you’re talking about
Someone tell him he can drag the pieces instead of clicking twice on that rusty trunk of a mouse...
This Kramnik thing accusing everybody of cheating is all a big confusion caused by the fact that he doesn't know what drag and drop is😂
Kramnik's opponent didn't seem for me to be a cheater.
Just played a well game, all tactics were findable, gg for him and L for Kramnik
Looked him up on the App. All stats are normal. He 100% didn't cheat and still active. Kramnik is mentally ill.
Agree. Kramnik's opening choice was bad. He had a bad light square bishop, have isolated and double pawns. It's very clear that white has the upperhanded after 10th move i think.
You guys debating, ha you stupid idiots are probably not even a fraction of what Kramnik has achieved, if an IM plays with 99 or 98 percent accuracy consistently why isn't he a GM.
@@patriotdrone9566 98.3% accuracy against GM, right. Also plays in complicated position without thinking.
@@maxdruno4368 He's an IM so what's your point, and a pretty strong IM too
Seemed like a normal game to me. The opponent even pre-moved several moves meaning he already saw the sequences.
Kramnik is just paranoid. He thinks just because he once was the world champion he will be unbeatable forever. So everyone who wins against him obviously must be a cheater.
What sequences? It changes his plan in very complex lines within a few seconds after each opponent's move. Last line was easy for an IM bcs SF did all the previus dirty work
Delusional 😂😂 stay 500 elo if this was complex 😂😂@@agelosmata
@@regardzz who allowed kindergartners to participate in the comment section ? Go bak to your mom kid
@@regardzzand what's your rating? 501?
This do feel like a cheater. People who comment about how they also have gotten games with close to perfekt accuracy forget that the longer the game and the better the resistence the harder it is to play near perfect, sure i also slam some 1600 with 96% in blitz in an 18 move game once in a blue moon, but to get 98,3% in a relativly long game with no major mistake is not easy. I also read that all the moves seems nartual, but forget to realize that there are MANY moves that seems natural in most positions yet to chose the best one every time is NOT normal for an IM or GM in blitz.. Not taking on d5 seems weird for blitz. 93% this guy cheated at least somewhere.
I am 1700 and I have played a game against a 2200(our district level champion) with 98.6 accuracy and still lost ........so that means he cheated ??
I'm sick of this guy constantly accusing players of cheating. I've had players accuse me of cheating when I've outplayed them. It's just sad and shows he's a bad sport. I hope he grows up.
Ha ha ha, bro is accusing everyone he loses again of cheating😂
2:46 The engine says that Ng6 was a mistake. c5 was better
But I cannot judge if a human could have seen this.
Something you guys should notice is that when you do a game review, the engine analyses the whole game in approximately 3 seconds. This means that the engine does not analyse anywhere near its full strength.
We notice
you can increase its depth theres slow and fast game review options kramnik has the low depth one
A little unrelated but just something to note, the game review is that fast because of cloud analysis being able to run multiple moves in parallel. If you analyze locally on your own pc it won't be anywhere as fast for similar depths.
He's slowly making himself the laughing stock of the chess world. This is not going to end well i'm afraid.
Do you really think that an international master can beat a former world champion in this way?
@@albertledromadaire Definitely possible, if you think otherwise something's wrong with your critical thinking skills.
@@albertledromadaire theres less then 100 elo difference between them. that means other guy should have a fair and good chance of winning ageinst kramnik. he won classical world championship 15 years ago. thats could just as easily been a lifetime ago considering the new tools we have had last few years to help people improve. kramnik just simply havent kept up since he won back then, and especially when it comes to rapid chess. for me kramnik just looks like an bitter old man that dosent realize he havent kept up with the new times, and instead of accepting it, he blames everyone around him for cheeting. its really sad this is probably what he gonna be remembered of instead of his archivements on the chessboard
@@albertledromadaire 'The dude is an IM with 2800 online Blitz rating. Of course he can beat a former WC who has 2900 online blitz rating. The rating difference is only 100 points
@@goldeneagle256 His fide rating is like 300 points lower than Kramnik's
He didnt cheated lmao. Normal looking moves, nothing crazy from his part. The last tactic at the end is easily found at their level. And his time consumption is good : fast on obvious moves, and he spent a lot on important décisions and when position is complex
and what are your qualifications to judge that better than kramnik? what's your elo
@@Ruedigerkackgans12 1900
@@Ruedigerkackgans12 You can make such judgements with computer assistance, no need to have Kramnik's rating.
@@bchain6416 a computer can't tell you if a move or sequence is human bruh
@@Ruedigerkackgans12 Of course not bruh, but with computer you can assess the complexity of the game, how deep tactical variation are an so forth.
He didn’t play well it’s as simple as that, and if you either underestimate your opponent or just play one bad move after the other, you’ll lose no matter what your name is.
98.3% accuracy against GM, right. Also plays in complicated position without thinking.
I absolutly don't understand where K saw an engine behind the IM play???
98,3% accuracy
I'm pretty sure it was in the midgame, when things got really complicated. Especially in very complex positions, it's very easy to make a mistake. So most humans do. But some people might cheat for a few moves when they don't really know what to do, and then go back to playing without assistance once the position clears up.
@@zengarland4421 Also everyone has his genius moments where everything goes well, even a 1500 rated player can have a 98.3% accuracy game every now and then. Wouldn't be common, but it's not weird or impossible.
guy played too fast imo
I used to play when I was a child after decades afew days ago I played online a couple of times. in one game I had 94.9 accuracy and I'm nobody
I would suspect a cheater there too. After f5 (horrible positional blunder i think) Nf4 and so one was strategical winning for white. And the fact, that the opponent dont go for Nxd5/ and Rc8+...a little bit sus
opponent blunders: cheater
opponent plays well: cheater
Somebody should tell him about click and drag.
Wait! Magnus doesn't click and drag too right?
I believe Magnus does it by choice but Kramnik seems like a total beginner in the computer world and somebody needs to tell him about click and drag.
@@Kosta110 Kramnik knows. He said he mouse slips a lot with click and drag.
it's so easy to blunder by release to far or to close.
@@ChessKingsTV777 Yeah I spoke too soon. The battery in my mouse is getting low and I had several mouse slips. Now I am clicking squares with Kramnik like it's 1999.
He used most of the time on a tactic which he did not do -Nxd5. When engine showed him the winning move, he was afraid that his performance would look too overwhelming and for a moment he did not know what to do. On one hand he wants to beat Kramnik, on second hand it would look too strong. You can`t beat Kramnik so badly and play so fast at the same time. I am surprised this cheater is still not banned. It`s sad to see world champion Kramnik finding himself in this s^^^^ all the time.
That's some head canon
He from Iran well yes cheater
Die Spielzüge habe ich als Amateur auch gesehen. Betrüge ich dann??😮😮😮
Ich habe die auch gesehen, wir sind besser als Kramnik
Tactics in this game were very very easy to spot. White always has e4 on his mind. Also there was no need to calculate till the end. Just the hanging bishop was enough for white to go for e4. It happened that everything else worked too, but the rest was too easy, even for an 1800 player to spot in seconds.
Besides TT now have at least one camera on. Dont they?
why is he clicking twice ? he can just drag and drop
Anti-Mouse slip blunder
@@AndersonAlves-xf3hp yeah, i do that often too... dragging is not safe!
@@AndersonAlves-xf3hp How does that make any sense. You can also mouse slip while trying to click on a specific square same like letting go the click on a specific square while dragging.
@@fh2234 It does make sense. Think again
@@ElSantoDeMostoles It doesnt, think again - uno reverse
Whenever Kramnik and Nakamura lose to lesser titled players, they claim they are cheaters. Bad losers.
I know mahdi and hes rating is 2450 and he is going to be A GM very soon
In the game hes playing the main line and thats why hes accuracy is 97
The move that kramnik played and said its a blunder is not even a blunder which shows how he is seeing ghosts. When u start the game judging by the nationality and believing hes cheater from the beginning guess what happens u play for the lose.
Claim a cheater by nationality? Thats wild ma boi
@@luxwutang OH BOY! You should watch the video of him vs a guy from India, check what he said in the beginning.
He’s not a cheater, he’s an Iranian international master, and he just played really well in this match his moves were all logical,
98.3 accuracy in a complicated endgame is a strong indicator of cheating, unfortunately. Not to mention that the guy had a +6 score before this game in a tournament where people like Magnus, Naka, Kramnik, Grischuk, Dubov...play.
98.3 accuracy against a 2700+ gm and a former WC is akin to a player scoring 5 goals in World Cup or Champions League final. It simply doesn't happen. In online chess it does? Why? Because people use engines.
@@andro99991 I’ve had plus 96 accuracy in many games, and less than 60 in others, many top players like magnus do t perform well in some tournaments like title Tuesday, while others do, I’m an Iranian and I know the guy, he’s a legit player, I’ve made analysis videos of some of his games. He’s name is Mehdi Gholami
@@andro99991 I’ve had plus 96 accuracy in many games, and less than 60 in others, many top players like Magnus sometimes don’t do well in some tournaments like title Tuesday. I’ve made some analysis videos about some of his games. He’s a legit player. His name is Mehdi Gholami
A little too fast to have that acccuracy tho. Can't really blame him for suspecting
totally cheater
98 % are to high
It's an International Master who is 100 points lower than Kramnik at short time controls. What does he expect? His opponent is not 1200 elo.
Kramnik's routine when he loses the game "
1. Block the opponent.
2. "Analyze"
3. Leave the tournament and log out" :-)
🤣🤣🤣
The procedure
Kramnik's face before he even started to play...he already knew...IM...from Iran... :D
Ye, it's obv cheater. 2300 player who see 10+ first line moves in few seconds.
Catched.
Bro it’s a common position ,people usually have played this position many times, so of course he knows the moves
@@FatsoFit I mean this was 35 moves later than the opening stage. Nobody knows so far :3
@@Frostgaming335unless they do and we are falsely accusing them
Specifically in this Match he was playing against Mahdi Gholami he is Iranian IM and is very much talented player and he is not a cheater. Vladimir is right there are a lot of cheaters but he only says that when is playing badly
I cheated Like this as a kid. Just dont Play the strongest moves and do 1-2 misstakes, the engine will still win the Game for you
Hello, I'm not a pro chess player but my rating is about 2000. It doesn't seem to be a cheater. I mean tactics like this you see in 1800 rated games. He's 2850 rated so about 100 points between you two. That means you will not beat him 100% of the games you play against him. Also he created his chess account in 2019. Cheaters usualy have new accounts.
This does not look like sane behaviour.
He doesn't even know how to premove.
He blundered early in the game.
The opponent had normal moves.
Yea. Agree..he played bad. Really bad. Even me should hold the last position.
Have you played 98% against 2700 GM?
thieves steal smartly so as not to be understood, they steal a few moves in a critical phase of the game
last few moves were not difficult but in the middlegame some moves were critical like at 3:35 rook to c5.it was a crucial move and might be an engine move.
They always turn on the engine at middlegame because openings are all about theory and you can do these moves almost instantly. Problem is when even when you do middlegame chaotically, they always find a miracle move to counteract all your movements. This is when you find a cheater.
@@RedwanurRahaman-cv9mrRc5 seems to me like the normal move, even an untitled club player would do. I mean, you don't have many pieces to improve easily in that position to something useful other than that rook attacking a hanging pawn in active position.
Then finding e4 trick so quick because of bishop hanging is much less obvious to me, but still not something crazy for IM level. Then the final tactical secuence would come along the way even if he didn't see that deep when doing e4. Check check check check... not so hard to spot after exd3, as Kramnik himself did in few seconds.
Wthat the ..? Every time he loses is because his opponent cheted? His oponnent even missed a good tactical move,i think Kramnik has serious personal issues
Maybe it's because it's Kramnik, but I didn't see how this could be cheating. The guy's moves were easy because Kramnik wasn't putting up much of a fight. Even I a mere 1700 was able to correctly guess many of his next moves.
i wonder what happens when he gets matched up against Magnus
How to conclude that opponent is cheater or not?
If he beats Kramnik in an online game, he must be a cheater (Kramnik's logic).
@@l.d.t.6327 🤣
Thou shalt no cheat.
It annoy me watching Kramnik click the piece and then the square. Just drag it!
Isn't click click faster than dragging?, like if u wanna drag a rook from a 8 to all opposite side of a1 for example, lol dragging takes long,
I dont drag either unless i have like 7 seconds. Too many mouse slips ruined alot of my games by dragging.
@@thomsonjonus5006 I had some annoying mouse slips, but I prefer to drag.
Surely it’s the same distance to move the mouse across the board whether you’re dragging or clicking?
@@8964TS yeah but fewer clicks
I didn't find this funny, I hate cheaters too, and it is extremely frustrating. Higher than 98 percent accuracy in such a fast and complicated game, from some unknown Master and not even GM does spell a cheater pretty clearly, Kramnik is correct. Not really funny
You're right! But what can we do about it? We allowed these private companies and instutions to take over chess and now they get to decide what the current and future chess is like.
I do think that Kramnik is paranoid regarding top GMs on this platform, but this particular game is of course a game with a cheater ))) crazy accuracy and what is more important - when white play e4 so quickly and confidently, they need to calculate everything until Rxd6, Nc5 otherwise black should hold that imho
There is no proof he cheated.. That's not hard sequence to calculate and everything is forced with not too many branches. Even the site agrees as he is not banned and still playing.
@@AKhan0372 site has zillion of cheaters not banned... What is your ELO? Mine is 2420, i am an IM and that sequence with e4 is very hard to find for me in a blitz game
U have to be really dumb to thinks this guy cheated
@@AKhan0372 what is your elo? I am an IM with 2400+, I find it very hard to start calculating such sequence in a blitz game...
Dalam pikiran kramnik: kalo dia melakukan langkah bagus yang tidak terduga pasti curang
i am not sure whether he is calling the opponent a cheater just because he lost the game. i hope thats not the case but if it is then Kramnik is a bad loser. haha. he should definitely learn to lose with pride
Looks a lot like a game I played the other day, but I played black and won. The opponent abandoned the game 2 moves from mate.
Whats your rating
Kramnik needs to understand:
1) He is no longer the best over the board chess player in the world
2) He is not, has never been and will never be the best blitz, bullet, rapid or online chess player in the world.
Part of the problem is that his ego keeps clouding his judgement about the strengths, weaknesses and abilities of other players who grew up with massive advantages in chess education that did not exist at the time Kramnik was learning and moving up in the chess world.
Kramnik is disgrace to himself. poor man. should learn how to lose and how to compete. disgrace.
You know nothing about chess and you're criticizing him when in this particular game it is more than obvious that it was a cheater and a very bad one
@@ADliver4430 Also, people love drama and laugh like crazy when Karmnik says something dubious but he's right as a whole and i understand why he finds the cheating on titled tuesday ridiculous!
@@ADliver4430this particular game ? Because of the devastating moves at the end ? Ridiculous you and Kramlik underestimate what players are capable of I don’t think there is definitive proof only accusation which means nothing unless substantiated
Your opponent missed Nxd5 and you still think he cheated?
This man looks like a pure cheater. Anyone who plays chess understands how inhuman the calculation of positions is here. The fact that he doesn't make the best move is a typical tactic of cheaters to cover their tracks. However, after this he creates a forced attack, where Kramnik does not even have any moves. Any move will deteriorate the position.
Legendary mouse skills!! Grumpy old man 😂
fhat
When he lost always accuse ppl cheating... like he accused hikaru is cheating
At this point we even hope people cheat against Kramnik
The IM is not a cheater he did not get banned he also coaches chess so why would he cheat it would ruin his reputation
Lmao maybe he wants a win against a former world champion to brag about it to the students lol you never know! People are crazy!
of course against Kramnik xD@@ChessKingsTV777
@@ChessKingsTV777 you are deeply paranoid
@@Icantremelmebrm you are deeply dumb.
Kramnik is a sad joke. Just looked up MetiForce on the app. He definitely did not cheat. He win loss stats are normal and he's a IM and chess coach. I hope they ban Karmnik for his stupidity.
98.3% accuracy against GM, right. Also plays in complicated position without thinking.
@@maxdruno4368 98% is normal in high level play. It is already proven he didn't cheat.
@@maxdruno436898% is quite normal at that level mate.... You'll probably understand when you get there one day
Poor Volodya...Finally you will all know the truth about the Elista scandal 2006. Аnd how cables were subsequently discovered in the toilet...
Ти па винаги има какво да кажеш !!!
@@kirokirov-lu8cs Защо ? Не е ли вярно ?.. Всъщност, като се замисля - прав си ! Толкова е смешен и жалък в последните години, че дори коментарите са излишни...
@@borisgorski7574 да не е северно македонец ,или "умно красив" анти-комунист-русофоб 🙄
This is kind of annoying to see. Your opponent clearly missed the Knight takes D5 tactic, which a computer wouldn't have. You're seeing ghosts now Kramnik, I'm 1800 rated and I'm sure you'd accuse me of cheating if we played over the board.
Don't get ahead of yourself now xD
Kramnik might be old but he's still capable of beating regular GMs. It's just these "gifted" IMs and FMs that give him a lot of trouble.
you have no idea what he would do to 1800 in 3 min or 5 min time control you can not even get out of opening pal
@@HexxuSz 1800 isn't that bad bub. What rating are you again? Speak for yourself.
i used to be 1700 15 years ago, vlad would literally fuck me up sideways blindfolded with no time on his clock@@kingmo565 i have played against local gm tornike sanikidze and it was like i did not even know how to play chess. and he was doing blindfolded simul... now imagine kramik
I’d, report him for stalling. I hate it when players do that.
This is really rude that at the start he saw Iran flag and said "let's see if I can put a resistance" like he was sure he is going to cheat. If he is too good why doesn't he play in an OTB tournament to see what he will do there. There might be cheaters but players got strong as well like every other game.
He said the same thing when he saw an Indian flag in my other video!
Honestly the way Kramnik played like my ass. I'm surprised that a world champion plays defense this badly
Against a strong engine even Magnus Carlsen will look bad. You don't understand engines and cheating.
It seems to me like the boy who take away the ball every time he loses, what if the oponent just played the game of his life?
98.3% accuracy against GM, right. Also plays in complicated position without thinking.
Hahaha, just for those who do not understand the accuracy analysis and believe that every low rated player with an accuracy of more than 90% is cheating:
I just played a 1 minute bullet game and my opponent won. I have no suspicion that he cheated. His accuracy: 99% 😂(and I even had the deep analysis mode on).
Here is the game (My opponent is white):
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Nc3 Nxe4 8.O-O Bxc3 9.d5 Bf6 10.Re1 Ne7 11.Rxe4 d6 12.Bg5 Bxg5 13.Nxg5 O-O 14.Nxh7 Kxh7 15.Qh5+ Kg8 16.Rh4 f5 17.Qh7+ Kf7 18.Rh6 Rg8 19.Re1 Kf8 20.Rh3 Bd7 21.Rhe3 Nc8 22.Be2 Qf6 23.Bh5 Nb6 24.Re6 Bxe6 25.Rxe6 Qxb2 26.Qxf5+ Qf6 27.Rxf6+
Well you know what to do than Block Him Do the Procedure 😅😂
Poor his wife😂
There is a problem with cheating in online chess - there is no doubt. Whether this guy did or not - we don’t know. 98.3 for a 3 minute chess match against kramnik is a very high score. But it might just be a game where everything came together for them. Who knows.
I’m barely 1000 and I once got 95+ or something, and I thought - they prob think I cheated but I didn’t! All the moves I did just seemed like the right moves. It doesn’t often happen. But I don’t think you can compare 95+ scores against poor players with 95+ scores against IM/GM. It’s a totally different metric because the likelihood of making accurate moves depends on your opponent. I was playing someone of similar level - so not great. Against lower players it’s significantly easier to get a more accurate score as there are no traps to fall into.
Kramnik is right to call for a thorough investigation into online chess cheating. I would never get such a score against a 1500+ player. Perhaps he takes matters into his own hands a bit because nothing is ever done about it.
I don’t see how online chess from your room can ever be policed properly. Even with camera people can have things hidden. I would not play for money in online chess because it is too open to abuse.
You can actually score pretty high, depending on more factors, like when the bot blundered (or human, doesn't matter). If he blundered in the opening, then all you do is a mop up. Small imperfections (inaccuracies) don't count that much, cause you're still a lot of points ahead on plus. So a "bad move" from +7 to +5, which is normally almost a knight, is still considered good play.
Even more important, the big number of moves can consolidate the so called accuracy, given you "slaughter" the opponent in many moves. So yes, I myself got many 90+ accuracy games against chess bots, rated anywhere between 1600 and 2300.
Everything is clear to me - Kramnik has become paranoid! If he loses, his opponent cheated 🤔
98.3% accuracy against GM, right. Also plays in complicated position without thinking.
am i the only one bothered by the click to move instead of dragging?
Vladimir... Please... Not more 3 minutes games.. you are a real champion... Play Minimum at 15 min./Game...
Nothing surprising. Anyone who is not Kramnik cannot win against him unless they are cheating. LOL.
/s
Meti use Stockfish or Kramnik has paranoia ?
If kramnic himself saw the line after he played the mistake(hindsight), how is it so implausible his opponent also found the continuation? Maybe it's time he retired. Players have never had this much access to training material ever, he compares them to computers...well duh kramnic, they have been training on computers since most of them were alive..
Sure Kramnik allegations are exagerrated
But here it was clearly a cheater and a very bad one
But to see people who know nothing about chess commenting and "mocking" him here is frankly ironic
You're stupid enough to not even realize he's right for this one
I entirely agree, even the cadence of the moves was very natural and it was a simple enough tactic, not some 15 move deep endgame analysis that’s perfect! I love Kramnik, I think chess players and fans all do, but it’s impossible to defend his behaviour of late. Very sad.
98.3 of accuracy. Totally computer
Kramnik is beast. Respect
Its a pity how people hates him because his is vocal about the situation. He is world champion with hudge exp plus even in his age he can beat Dubov in blitz. Stupid haters thats all. Plus he never accused Hikaru the last one made it up
I will call you a cheater if you are 100 elo lesser than me and somehow defeats me
Everyone beat this guy he called him cheater wtfk 😂😂😂 you're joke Mr karmnik
Kramnik lost his respect from everyone
He is ashamed that IM saw a pawn push in the center and he didnt. why block the guy kramnik you are old now and not in your prime . Sometimes you lose what is the point... you had doubled pawns the whole game and slightly worse position
Ok, from Iran .. humm interesting!, was a pleasure play with this fish, reported and blocked!
Kramnik isn’t messing around. He’s catching all these no good cheaters.
Sure. When you accuse everyone, you're bound to catch the cheaters (as well as the non-cheaters). Too bad he can't tell the two groups apart.
It was Kramnik’a very poor play that lost him this game. The tactics were simple and K played like a 2100 rated player. As he says, that was probably because he was tired. Note, he didn’t say what his % was.
90 or 91.
He beat Levon Aronian before this game. But International Masters can be stronger than superGMs sometimes.
His name is Mehdi Gholami orimi from Iran and he isn’t a cheater , Iran have many young talents
Embarassing what kramnik has become. Once when you heard of Kramnik it was always associated with maturity, professionalism, respect. Now he is making youtube content out of it. Good job
this player is not banned
because he didn´t cheat
98%? Wtf
even 1800 can do 98. Not a problem.
@@oleg2205 98.3% accuracy against GM, right. Also plays in complicated position without thinking.
@@maxdruno4368 but it is 2800 player. And GM is still a human being. And how we can prove that somebody wasn't thinking?
When Kramnik loses: Oh no human plays chess better than me no human can beat me he cheated no way he beat me with 98.3 he cheated block him!!!
All moves including not taking advantage of his blunder???? The blunder he pointed out himself??
98.3% accuracy against GM, right. Also plays in complicated position without thinking.
Kramnik has entered an inescapable loop. His brilliant strategic play of 20 years ago has declined to the point where he makes all his opponents better - he almost forces them to make the best moves. Kramnik's middle game here was particularly aimless. Spent most of his time making sure his own knight never got into the game, refusing (twice!) to put it on a strong outpost. A younger Kramnik would have stuck that knight in his opponents throat. We all decline with age, wish he would do so more gracefully.
Could you please tell us your ELO? :-) Kramnik is not in his prime anymore, but trying to put it on that terms to justify perfect play from a random iranian piece of s..t it's embarassing for most solid chess players. My guess is you simply don't understand how chess works. At a Master level you can really tell when people cheat. You can't really PROVE IT, because 98% accuracy is not a sufficient prove, but that is a different story.
@@Deathster88 have fun with that
@@Deathster88 it is easy to archieve such a high accuracy if one side blunders and plays horrible
@@Deathster88you’re like the guy that says yeah Trump you won
Так мало русских комментариев, сплошь инглиш, который мы принципиально не учим и не понимаем, я тоже оставлю коммент на человеческом и великом языке
If he was really cheating, wouldn’t the cheater have won?
I don`t know why it is supposed to be funny, when a cheater is detected. Kramnik is far above everyone, who is criticizing him. Nevertheless people have the audacity of ridiculing him. Instead they should be grateful that he helps to bring attention to the cheating that is going on that robs the honest participants of their prize money or at least well deserved rating points.
Cheating is a big danger to chess and people , who do it need to be exposed and punished.
what cheat? even a noob like me saw the bad position of black since move 9-10. dead light bishop, dead rook on b6, almost no tentative to attack somehow and open the game.
He played at 3650 elo.
Legend
The opponent plays natural and human moves.
Kramnik: "Cheater"
98.3% accuracy against GM, right. Also plays in complicated position without thinking.
@@maxdruno4368they were all very natural moves