Can You Wipe Over Cotton Socks? - Suhaib Webb
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
- Get 1000 free mp3 files of Hamza Yusuf,
Siraj Wahhaj, Ayden Zayn and others!
www.aydenzayn....
This is chapter 14. Watch the full lecture here: • Q&A on Gender Relation...
Qur'an: Miraculous Book of Guidance: • Qur'an: The Miraculous...
Buy the DVD or MP3: www.islamondema...
Find more Islam On Demand lectures here:
iTunes/Apple Music: www.islamondema...
DVDs and MP3s: www.islamondema...
Please support our many efforts:
www.IslamOnDema...
www.30FactsAbou...
www.AydenZayn.com
www.Islamogram.com
Subscribe/Follow:
Newsletter: www.islamondema...
TH-cam: / islamondemand
Facebook: / islamondemand
Twitter: / islamondemand
Pinterest: / islamondemand
Instagram: / islamondemand
And please don't forget to like, share and subscribe!
TERMS OF USE:
If you use any part of this video or audio in your own production, you must do AT LEAST TWO of the following (and they MUST REMAIN as long as our content appears on your channel):
1) And an end screen that either links to our channel or links to our video that contains the content you used. For instructions on how to do this watch this video: • How To Add End Screen ...
2) Add a card that links to our channel. The card's teaser text should say “Check out Islam On Demand”. For instructions on how to do this watch this video: • How to Add a Card to a...
3) Add our channel to your list of recommended channels.
4) Add the following text in the VERY TOP of your video's description: Check out the Islam On Demand TH-cam channel: / islamondemand
5) Add a legible and clearly visible text overlay that appears in the FIRST HALF of your video and remains on screen for at least 7 seconds that says “Support Islam On Demand at www.IslamOnDemand.com"
for the ignorant people here talking about the imam, memorize the Quran in its entirety in your twenties without having known a letter of arabic before , devote your life to over two decades of study, then u can talk about this brother or those like him. until then do as the prophet pbuh instructed for those who believe in Allah and the last day, say what is good or stay silent .
Assalamu Alaikum from 2020. That’s what I was looking for SUBHANALLAH
Suhaib Web is a host of Chanel Al Hijrah in Malaysia..He translate what Quran mean(Tadabbur)..May Allah Blessing him and us....He transllate and Review Quran so Detail and Amazingly..Sory for my english suck..
😂 😂 😂
We got a lot of mufti's in the comments section..
And they’re really annoying.
MashaAllah, concise and accurate opinion. Well explained and told.
May Allah aza wa jal continue to bless this wonderful imam br. Suheib. I was in Roxbury mass one day back on the block and I was walking by the ISB. Of Boston in Dyer need of money for x y z reasons and the brother didn't even hesitate to give me 20.00 dollars.. amin
It's not a good stand point to also say that the wudu of a great portion of the Ummah for centuries, including the Maliki imams, are "invalid" and therefore their prayers are "invalid". That's a very bold statement especially over a gray issue of which there is evidence for multiple opinions. Let's try to hold on to the rope of Allah, keep to the community, and not let these issue divide us or think ill of each other. Very extreme when someone won't pray behind an imam who follows this opinion.
I believe the socks they wore were made from a thick leather which was more like a boot. It's not really clear to say thin cotton socks are for sure okay to wipe over. It's a matter of dispute but it's a much stronger position to just wash the foot without the sock. Don't be lazy folks!
Can you please specify where does ibn Abidin mention in his haashiyah, as you said he did, that it is permissible to follow any opinion from any of the 4 mathaahib?
What ibn Abidin DOES mention is that it is waajib to follow a specific mathhab.
nobodys criticising a scholar who simply repeats the position of 1 madhab. nothing unusual there then
Thank you so much for being Madhabi.
who are you?
Can someone tell me do I wipe over and under the socks also how many times do I wipe each foot
nuaree mrin You wipe over the socks once each. First right foot then left. You dont wipe under the foot.
‘Abd Khayr reported: Ali ibn Abi Talib, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “If the religion were based upon one’s opinion, one might expect the bottom of the leather sock to be wiped instead of the top. I have seen the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, wiping over the upper part of his leather socks.”
Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 162
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
عَنْ عَبْدِ خَيْرٍ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ قَالَ لَوْ كَانَ الدِّينُ بِالرَّأْيِ لَكَانَ أَسْفَلُ الْخُفِّ أَوْلَى بِالْمَسْحِ مِنْ أَعْلَاهُ وَقَدْ رَأَيْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَمْسَحُ عَلَى ظَاهِرِ خُفَّيْهِ
162 سنن أبي داود كتاب الطهارة باب كيف المسح
162 المحدث الألباني خلاصة حكم المحدث صحيح في صحيح أبي داود
He looks like a great scholar. I don’t want understand why people are complaining
Because most people are idiots.
He's not a scholar.
@@johnrazna2381
Based on what?
@@Amadeus-ms9lt he's a complete utter fool, he has said music is permissible before
@@johnrazna2381
And having that opinion qualifies him as a fool?
You are right sir
How can you decide the thickness
I been asking bro what's thick?
That it’s not see-through
@@Ummmaryameesa jazakallahkhair
It is not right brother Best to avoid the confusion better wash your foot, how much time does it takes to wash it ? Consider opinion or rest 3 imams they’ve evidence as well,Can we not just wash it ?
Thanks 🙏
for me it does not matter as long as he's feeling comfortable
they wore hard woolen socks (soof) not cotton. and theres a difference. also lether socks, and they have to be durable, resistant, ankle covering socks with the conditions that they are waterproof so water wont go thru them and that one can walk at least 3 miles in them, even outdoors, and if it rips or there a holes in them the size of a durham or bigger than its also impersssibkle to wipe over them according to the hanafi and hanbali schools
The prophet peace be upon him never mentioned those conditions
Some scholars simply extrapolated them based on their understanding
Other scholars disagreed with them
It’s open to debate
@@ابراهيمالجبوري-خ7ق the scholars of ahlul sunnah unanimously agree on at least 3 of the conditions that I mentioned, it does not have to mentioned in the prophetic sunnah, ijma is also a source (1 of the 4) of Islamic legislation after Quran and sunnah (in which the Holy prophet only definitively wiped over his feet and leather socks) , wallahu alam, it's always better to stay safe,and there plenty of leather and especially non leather socks (not just the wudugear socks either) that fullfil those conditions (there are also sock shoes, or hiking or neoprene kind)basically the ones that are waterproof/highly resistant, abrasion resistant, windproof, weatherproof, thermal(sometimes) , thick socks, (like the sand/beach/camping/diving/swimming kind/ which mostly or always fullfil those conditions, except that some of them dont cover the ankles) one just to has to look for them (and there easy to find, literally)
@@lordrisen3696
1. Covering the ankle
2. Not being see through (being thick)
3. Being able to walk in them
Those three are more or less unanimously agreed-upon but even they are not TRULY; just almost unanimously.
However being waterproof or water resistant or being made of leather or being able to walk 3 miles. None of those points are agreed-upon
The first three points I mentioned up above are generally fulfilled by modern socks. Very thin socks such as nylon socks or dress socks do not meet the above three conditions obviously. However work socks, (like dickies) hiking socks (Which are not waterproof by the way I’m wearing some right now) And also thermal socks, and in general just thick wool or cotton socks you can buy at target or Walmart or any other store.
The socks meet the three points above which are more or less unanimous however the points that are differed over in my opinion don’t really have a lot of evidence to back them up. Their main idea is making sure that the sock is similar to the original leather sock that they used to wipe on in the past. However I don’t see how it has to be similar in every aspect. the basic similarity is that people wear it as footwear. And it’s thick enough to be useful when you wear it such as preventing your feet from being cold or preventing bacteria from building up in your shoe or moisture or a bad smell etc.
It seems to me fairly obvious that the whole reason it’s permitted to wipe over the original leather sock (Khuff) was because people used to wear them a lot and it was difficult or annoying to remove them on a regular basis…
same thing with modern socks if you have a reason to wear them.
والله اعلم
@@ابراهيمالجبوري-خ7ق again,God bless you,that's simply your personal qiyas of the matter,(respectfully) but according to the four schools the water musnt be able to permeate the sock or the wudu is invalid and one must wash his feet, also they musnt have holes and them and its detested even in hanbali fiqh to wear raggy or patched kind of socks or even cotton socks that are not abrasion resistant, cause there is a higher chance of them being ripped, which makes them invalid to use, (if it leads to haram then it is haram( and alot of times their not odor wicking either plus them not being waterproof which gives a bad smell when wiped over, and then the socks are soggy and smelly, on top of being dirty sometimes , and then one walks on the masjid musalla and congregation with those, which is repugnant to say the least, and and a lack of decorum,) as for the reason people wore it, that's also mention in the books of jurisprudence, and its detested to wear it purely for the sake of wiping them and not wanting to wash your feet (leisure and laziness) and they never did that as ibn al qayyum mentions and as ibn taymiyah, and imam al dawani al .Maliki said even concerning khuffayn that its detested if done for that reason and that its tarfee'h ترفيه، and its pure vanity and is not valid, washing feet is the essence %origin (asl) and khuffs are a rukhsa, (and there is a slight difference In this) as for cotton, for they are also prohibited by a huge majority of scholars and especially the shafii school although ghazali and ibn hazm negated the necessity of cotton and it was ok according to them as long is it met the general conditions I mentioned, wool however and other fabrics especailly merino wool(a super high quality thick wool) besides leather is a way better alternative and Abu hanifah was reported to have used thick woolen khuff and the end if his life , wallahu alam , barakallahu feekum, God bless and preserve you amen(btw I'm not saying your absolutely wrong or that your prayer is invalid lol)
@@lordrisen3696
First off the idea that a sock has to be waterproof according to the four schools is incorrect. The Hanbalis (In the relied upon/more famous position) have no requirement that a sock or Khuff is waterproof. And some shafi’i scholars hold this view as well;
( وَالثَّانِي ) لَا يُشْتَرَطُ بَلْ يَجُوزُ الْمَسْحُ وَإِنْ نَفَذَ الْمَاءُ ، وَاخْتَارَهُ إمَامُ الْحَرَمَيْنِ وَالْغَزَالِيُّ لِوُجُودِ السَّتْرِ ، قَالَ الْإِمَامُ : وَلِأَنَّ عُلَمَاءَنَا نَصُّوا عَلَى أَنَّهُ لَوْ انْتَقَبَتْ ظِهَارَةُ الْخُفِّ مِنْ مَوْضِعٍ آخَرَ لَا يُحَاذِيهِ وَكَانَ بِحَيْثُ لَا يَظْهَرُ مِنْ الْقَدَمَيْنِ شَيْءٌ وَلَكِنْ لَوْ صُبَّ الْمَاءُ فِي ثُقْبِ الظِّهَارَةِ يَجْرِي إلَى ثُقْبِ الْبِطَانَةِ وَوَصَلَ إلَى الْقَدَمِ جَازَ الْمَسْحُ ، فَإِذَنْ لَا أَثَرَ لِنُفُوذِ الْمَاءِ مَعَ أَنَّ الْمَاءَ فِي الْمَسْحِ لَا يَنْفُذُ ، وَالْغَسْلُ لَيْسَ مَأْمُورًا بِهِ ، هَذَا كَلَامُ الْإِمَامِ وَالْمَذْهَبُ الْأَوَّلُ . وَاَللَّهُ أَعْلَمُ
Al-ghazali and imam Al-haramyn, both were eminent scholars of the shafi’i madhab. also ibn hazm Al-thahiri and of course ibn tayimmah the Hanbali scholar the salafis like to quote a lot
The same thing about the point you made about holes being in the socks. There is no consensus about them having to be free of holes. Abu hanifah believed they should not have more than three fingers span of holes; or about the size of a dirham; or the bottom of goats feet (according to some)
The Malikis are even more lenient… going up to about 1/3 of the Khuff. If the holes are less than that it’s still valid to wipe on it. Of course they don’t allow on anything other than leather but the point still stands.
Some of the shafi’is also permitted a minor amount of holes.
And in regards to wearing then purely for the sake of wiping; weather it be socks or Khuff There is no direct evidence it’s disliked. One could argue that intentionally doing anything for the sake of rukhsah/ease is disliked. But there is no evidence to support that. In fact it is preferred to make wudu for each prayer, before bed, after going the bathroom, etc.. so if someone wears socks with the intention of being able to that more often, or because they lose wudu a lot. I don’t see how that is detestable.
And yes what I mentioned was my own personal qiyas, but that’s the point is qiyas. There is room for opinion. It’s hard (in some cases) to determine what is valid or invalid qiyas. Back then most people wore Khuff or sandals or a combination.
Nowadays people wear modern shoes with socks; most people don’t wear Khuff. In fact if you wear them inside the shoes they will make your feet smell really bad; in fact if you just don’t wear socks and walk around a lot in shoes your feet will smell horrible and you may be getting an infection.
I do like merino wool but it is hydrophilic, and it’s not that thick to be honest. I have thicker wool socks that I wear, hiking socks from sporting goods stores. They are not water proof but I could easily walk For miles in them without issue (over normal terrain)
In the end each person makes a choice. My problem is mostly with the hanafi brothers who sometimes won’t pray behind an Imam who wipes over socks.
Yes in principle the muqtadi should not pray behind an imam if he believes he wudu is invalid; however in practice and real world implications it leads to division and problems. Sometimes things in theory makes sense but in practice they don’t really work
If they imam prays with what he thinks is valid wudu. and he’s not going against absolute consensus you should pray with him.
For example if he touched a woman, or vomits, or bleeds, etc…
he quote falsely abt imam ahmad(ra), on top of that he says ''there is no hardships in islam'' so then i wud advise why not pray without wudhu coz if washing ur feet is hardship then its better do ur salah without wudhu, thats much better to get rid of hardships of doing masah on khuffain or washing one;s feet
on contrary the hardships faced by prophet(saw) and his companions is nothing as per hardships u face while washing ur own feets, these are not hambalis but najdis a neo-khawarij of our time
It’s not a false quote. It is the position of the Hanbali madhhab
Actually the sahabah did it on Jaorab. Socks on of nowadays is not like that.
Strongest opinion is the view of imam malik, shafi and Abu Hanifah.
And the three conditions are for the jaorab
Search my friend
There are both
For jurabain and kuffain
th-cam.com/video/bJ5Tv8N-yuI/w-d-xo.html
No idea what you are talking about Akhi. I will stick with my Hanabli Shaykh who has studied the deen for decades over some layman.
Feeling comfortable is not as important as Adab...
Please ask questions regarding fikh to those adequately qualified in matters of fikh ... and these have always been few in the ummat. Too many people with inadequate knowledge are addressing these kind of questions and are leading people astray. The answer this brother has given very poor and contrary to senior muftis. Please be cautious in matters of Deen.
You’re kidding. As he said it’s the opinion of Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal and it was done by some sahaba
@@Ummmaryameesa Yes that is what he said. However he also said that the other three Imams disagreed with him. That is sufficient to cause doubt. Also when we talk about cotton socks, the ones we commonly use these days were not available in Madina of the time of the prophet of Allaah. It is likely that the type of socks Iman Ahmed said we're permissible are not available these days.
There is clearly enough doubt amongst Muslims over this matter.
The prophet SAWS ordered us to leave what makes us doubt for that which does not make us doubt.
Assalamu'alaikum. Just an advice to anyone reading:
It's better to get kuffs instead of just wondering if it's permissible to wipe over socks. 3 v 1 madhab khilaf is not a good standpoint.
Seekersilver there are numerous cases in which the hanafis are alone and the other three madhabs are united. That doesn’t make hanafis wrong per say
What nonsense, take anything from another school of thought
Very weak answer. Totally contrary to the majority of classical scholars.
So you've met all the classical scholars have you?
he is an "proud American" (first) then a so called "sheikh"
but I am sure he knows the warning "being proud" from the Qur'an and the hadith
I’m sure it doesn’t bother you when someone is a proud Pakistani or Indonesian or Somali, or especially a proud wherever you’re from. But if someone is a proud American that automatically makes them less of a Muslim? If anything, an American has to have MoRE certainty in Islam to even be a Muslim in the first place. He’s a haafidh of Quran and a graduate of Al azhar. What about you? Backbiting MashaAllah 👏
Lol suhaib webb, he is just a joke
you are a greater joke, ya akhi.
The believer is he whose tongue and hand are cordoned from harm to other Muslims
You’re the joke. Have you studied at al azhar or just some random guy backbiting on the internet? Have you memorized Quran and learned fluent Arabic even?