As others have pointed out, 4 players and 2 snakes means the mongoose is the only player, who doesn't know who to trust. The snakes obviously know, and the human can easily deduce it, since they know their own role and the mongoose. This problem could be easily fixed by making the number of snakes variable. If there are between 1-3 snakes each round, or 1-2, or even 0-2, then the game becomes much more interesting imo.
Yeah I was thinking about this during work after the rules were explained cause I was just like “it’s essentially 1v2 with another person just there trying to figure out who they’re supposed to help.” I think ditching the mongoose entirely makes the game much more entertaining
@@someusername1452 Oh, that's not the issue. The snakes could just as easily claim to be the human, so with the setup of this video, the mongoose can never be sure who to trust. It just seems boring that the human can figure out every role for certain. Not much of a social deduction game, if only 1 player is left in the dark. With a variable number of snakes, it becomes a lot more difficult to figure out who to trust.
@@ahlpym This game really looks like it was meant for more people. Yes you *can* still play it with 4 people but it’s a lot less interesting than if you played it with the max amount of people big potato recommended, which is 8.
theory: the reason that Sammy hosts "Some Lovely Board Games" is because when he ISN'T the host, he will stop at nothing to derail the games and Big Potato wanted a little bit less chaos
Hello, Just wanted to precise that the study about choccy milk and americans is flawed. They were presented the question "Where does chocolate milk comes from ?" : A. White cows B. Brown cows C. Black cows D. I don't know When presented this kind of question, it is not a surprise that some people were not answering seriously. This was mandated by a company that makes chocolate milk, to use it in an ad. This percentage however got overseas, and we were fed this crazy stat without any context. I am, indeed, not fun at parties.
I think that's just a consequence of having only four people play the game. The box seems to say 4-8 players, so it'd probably be better with more players. Maybe you could change the number of snakes depending on how many players you have to help deal with this issue.
As a child, I always thought that since horses and cows were always kept together, and because at preschool you either got apple juice or milk, that cows made milk and horses made apple juice.
Okay. There are four of us. I am a human, that guy's the Mongoose, and there are two snakes. *Hmm.* (I'm only kidding, this was so fun to watch. Content for the soul!!)
To be fair, knowing the snakes are snakes doesnt help. The mongoose doesnt see the correct answer, so they still have to figure it out. The snakes, who know the answer can still manipulate them into getting it wrong.
Regarding the Egyptian question: considering that Heqet, ancient goddess of childbirth, was pictured as a frog headed woman, clearly frogs were familiar enough to the Egyptians from the yearly flooding of the Nile. Also there are a hedgehog species native to Egypt. As (like the mongoose) they hunt snakes, they were sacred to the sun god Ra, who was supposed to face the demon serpent Apep nightly.
If someone starts the round with "I dont think it's XYZ" instead of "I think it's XYZ .." you are immediatly suspicious, and I am kinda sad it worked in the first round.
Why? If you're not sure between the other two, but you're pretty sure it's not that one, of course you're going to say that. The alternative is to say nothing. If anything I'd argue that makes someone less suspicious since it's ridiculous to think the snake would risk immediately outing themselves like that. Basically, it's a bluffing game and all bluffing is complicated, you can't make statements like yours without there being numerous problems with them.
I think what's even more confusing is that the human didn't IMMEDIATELY know who the snakes were. It seems like a difficult game to actually screw up with only 4 players. For example, with four people, two are snakes one is human and one is mongoose. If you are human, you know that you are human, therefore there can be no others. The mongoose's identity is revealed to everyone, so you know who the mongoose is. Therefore the last two must be snakes and are not to be trusted.
@@alansmithee419 The alternative is not to say nothing, it's to say that you are not sure. It's to say "I dont know". It's to at least say, that you are unsure between 2 options. Of course it's essentially the same, but the goal is not to exclude an answer, but to find the correct one. It's not about the absolute value of the statement. It's about the implications and reading of a first suggestion. Of course the goal can be to "bluff" people into picking the option you suggested is wrong on the assumption that these people already suspect you. But still that's something weird to do upfront. Just because it's a bluffing game, doesnt mean that there aren't ways to control suspicion. Bein suspicious can be good and bad, but it's something to look out for. The point still stands. I tend to distrust people more, if they try to discourage an option, especially when they dont have explicit knowledge, or can cite where you have learned that factoid. The first question perfectly makes that point. Eddie knew Wallpaper was wrong, so instead of nudging people towards answeres he knew were wrong, by saying he was considering two options over the other, he just out of the gate BOOM went "Nah it's not that one, source: trust me dude" If it's bluffing, it's bad bluffing, is my point.
@@YTNFSCC Well all I know is that if I were given three things and told one of them was true, but there was one I was sure was wrong, I too would point that out in a heartbeat. It's easy to rationalise that someone's behaviour is suspicious when you're already convinced (or in this case are fully aware) of their guilt.
These guys are so genuinely nice, like the coming out of mongoose was so respectful and accurate ! It would have been easy for anyone to make a joke and be stupid with this subject but you managed to be funny AND respectful... Thank you!
Yes. Every life form is trying to evolve into crabs. And we have seen this in crustaceans almost identical to crabs that live in identical environments to crabs, causing them to become slightly more similar. Truly, conclusive evidence that all animals, every single one, are becoming crabs.
The whole '''hard mood/gonegoose'' section of the vid may be one of my new favorite ''tomska and friends'' moments, i was struggling not to choke on my food from laughter
I am being humble when I am telling you that I am the most powerful strongest coolest smartest most famous greatest funniest Y*uTub3r of all time! That's the reason I have multiple girlfriends and I show them off all the time! Bye bye sk
You don't know how much I wanted Elliot to quote Jeremy Irons' infamous line from the opening of Dungeons and Dragons after pissing off Tom by continuing the joke. He failed all of us.
I love Tom's Big Brain play at the last question. Vehemently arguing against one option to make himself seem suspicious, then giving shit arguments, but that option was actually wrong.
This seems like one of those games that's fun the first couple times, but once you've gone through all the cards and know all the answers you either have to buy expansion packs or never play the game ever again.
@TheSportsGuru its a bible story that can’t be proved real, they weren’t even targeting a specific group of people with their jokes and they were literally discussing it in relation to the question.
@TheSportsGuru I disagree that this specific case is a double standard because I think the joke was meant to be sarcastic and not to be taken at face value. Even if it WAS from malicious intent to mock and belittle religion it’s a very minor jab at best and I don’t consider these small double standards something new or the downfall of humanity
@TheSportsGuru I meant that small double standards aren’t the cause of humanity’s downfall, and I rewatched it and it still feels to me like a part of the video that isn’t meant to be taken literally at face value. It may be just me but it seems like he knows that him saying the Bible is a children’s book is a hot take so he jokingly doubles down by saying “yeah I said it”
wait, logically, if there is 4 players, and one is guaranteed good (mongoose), and there are two snakes, then you not being the mongoose or snakes, you would know exactly who the snakes are, right?
it'd probably be better with more but also consider the Mongoose doesn't know who the human is, and its likely to make the mongoose suspicious of you if your likr "WELL I'M HUMAN AND" so its better to just play as a better convincer than really go into the social deduction aspect of it at this size, but imagine teh chaos with like 6-12 people--
@@Draig44 well that and convincing the mongoose you arent a snake. im just the asshole who plays games like this and has to make the answers a logical thing
@@flicnerdy4385 oh yeah, im sure with that many people it would be a blast. im just the asshole that looks at the logistics of something and goes "hold on a sec"
15:19 that's a harsh callout right there, glad they can joke about this kind of thing, Tom seems like someone who would maybe take that to heart. Probably more than a decade of degrading comments on the internet toughened him up for it. Good on you guys for being able to make jokes like that about eachother.
The whole crab thing is an ACTUAL thing like some random sea animals always turned into crabs throught their evolution because it's just the best way to gain food have armor and move at the sea floor there was also a Now famous YT vid about it
I wanted to watch this right away, but I'm in the silent part of the library and the first minute has made me laugh out loud already, so that seems like danger 😂
Okay but riddle me this. If you are playing with 4 people, 2 snakes, and the mongoose of truth, and get ordinary human, wouldn't you be able to see who the mongoose is, and then know who the snakes are because you're the only ordinary human?
The word is carcinization. On multiple occasions, nature has evolved q creature into a crab-like creature, independent of other factors. Crabs truly are the most optimal lifeform. Reject humanity, reject monke, advance to crab
Honestly how does this make sense with four players, the human is always gonna know who the snakes are, because they know they aren't one, and they know the mongoose isn't one, unless theres a variable amount of snakes they would always know that the remaining two players are the snakes.
10:32 The fact, often flanderised, is that _specifically crustaceans_ are always trying to evolve into crabs. Also, "always" is hyperbole, it's just somewhat frequently. So carcinisation never had any relevance to the question, but it's perfectly understandable how Tom got confused.
Things TomSka and friends and Markiplier and his friends have in common : funny, silly, handles trans jokes very well without being a pos about it, and loved by millions
14:29 Actually, the story of the plagues is true. There’s some debate of their exact nature and how many there were, but it really happened. The question is whether or not it was an act of god
The fucking Sammy wheeze is so good. The pure amount of idiocy is fascinating. Also i just realized like 9 minutes into the video, the background is a green screen. Just perfect.
Gotta say, basing it off of this video. This game seems like it’s really easy to know who’s a liar. The mongoose announces themselves at the start of the round so you know they aren’t trying to lie to you. And if you get the normal human character card, you know the other two people are the snakes. So it’s like, what’s the point?
Looks like a cool game to play between friends :) took me 10 min to realise they are actually in front of a green screen tho lol.. Idea for a longer form: 10 questions in a row without the actors being revealed until the end(except mongoose of course) in order: question > diskussion > answer repeat; points get tallied up in the end. The rest of the rules stay the same.
Fun fact, in the original hebrew, frog is referred to in the singular (i.e. a plague of frog), which some have interpreted as a single frog plaguing egypt rather than many.
I don’t frequent the channel, but I understand the rough history, and glad to see everyone is doing well. I hope it’s not bad for me to mention it. Im just glad other humans are doing well
Does Snakesss work better with more than 4 people? Absolutely. Can I fit more than 4 people in my studio? Not even slightly.
lips
hi jeremy irons
oh THAT's why it makes almost no sense...
tim
Bazinga
This is like the evolution of facial hair from left to right.
Underrated comment!
You have way to few likes.
Off-Screen is a man with a crab for a beard ofc
LMAO
XD
As others have pointed out, 4 players and 2 snakes means the mongoose is the only player, who doesn't know who to trust. The snakes obviously know, and the human can easily deduce it, since they know their own role and the mongoose.
This problem could be easily fixed by making the number of snakes variable. If there are between 1-3 snakes each round, or 1-2, or even 0-2, then the game becomes much more interesting imo.
I agree
Yeah I was thinking about this during work after the rules were explained cause I was just like “it’s essentially 1v2 with another person just there trying to figure out who they’re supposed to help.” I think ditching the mongoose entirely makes the game much more entertaining
There’s probably a rule against revealing the role of others
@@someusername1452
Oh, that's not the issue. The snakes could just as easily claim to be the human, so with the setup of this video, the mongoose can never be sure who to trust.
It just seems boring that the human can figure out every role for certain. Not much of a social deduction game, if only 1 player is left in the dark. With a variable number of snakes, it becomes a lot more difficult to figure out who to trust.
@@ahlpym This game really looks like it was meant for more people. Yes you *can* still play it with 4 people but it’s a lot less interesting than if you played it with the max amount of people big potato recommended, which is 8.
"Hey you, my name is Thomas 'Tomska' Ridgewell"
"I'm Jeremy Irons"
"I'm Jeremy Irons"
"And I'm Jeremy Irons"
"And welcome back to CONTENT"
"And welcome back to JEREMY IRONS"*
And I'm Nathan
"hey you my name is Jeremy 'tomska' irons"
"I'm Jeremy irons"
"I'm Jeremy irons"
"And I'm Jeremy irons"
"And welcome back to JEREMY IRONS"
"A crappy series that Jeremy Irons asked for"
Hey you, my name is Jeremy "GerrySka" Irons
god love how you can tell tom has a tumblr by how casually he brings up carcinization
please don't tell people how I live
@@TomSkaAndFriends hi Tom and by the way I know how you live
And just for a fact. I *loved* your new shoelaces. It reminds of James the red engine
@@TomSkaAndFriends we will.
@@Lights_of_Silver I wished to never hear that phrase again.
theory: the reason that Sammy hosts "Some Lovely Board Games" is because when he ISN'T the host, he will stop at nothing to derail the games and Big Potato wanted a little bit less chaos
sammy stops at nothing to derail everything
I want some more lovely board games! I laughed so much!!
Where is that game I need to buy it!
As a little chaos boy, I don't like that *possible* decision
what do you mean? thats clearly jeremy irons
Hello,
Just wanted to precise that the study about choccy milk and americans is flawed.
They were presented the question "Where does chocolate milk comes from ?" :
A. White cows
B. Brown cows
C. Black cows
D. I don't know
When presented this kind of question, it is not a surprise that some people were not answering seriously. This was mandated by a company that makes chocolate milk, to use it in an ad.
This percentage however got overseas, and we were fed this crazy stat without any context.
I am, indeed, not fun at parties.
Yes you are not now please shut up
I also think you’re not fun at parties but I like that about you :)
While COVID still rules it really doesn’t matter how fun you are at parties
Interesting facts are always fun at parties
Thanks nice people, I love you all.
I love how none of them acknowledged the fact that if they are the human, and they know who the mongoose is, they know who the snakes are
But the mongoose won't, that's why they removed the mongoose
I think that's just a consequence of having only four people play the game. The box seems to say 4-8 players, so it'd probably be better with more players. Maybe you could change the number of snakes depending on how many players you have to help deal with this issue.
Sammy: I _am_ Sammy Paul
Me, who rewatches #CONTENT incessantly: Ah, the guy who has Nando's plain
Funnily enough, I JUST watched that episode before this one.
Ngl the bit where the mongoose came out as agender and everyone was accepting gave me so many warm fuzzy feelings.
Thanks for that!
that few seconds summed up the 6 months of my life and I love it
@@zexa252 You're six months old? Happy late half birthday to you!
@@JacobButter LMAO, I am technically 6 month old being Agedner, so thank you
@@zexa252 probably been about 7 now but well done! Go you!
@@joogiewatkins1519 oh yeah it is 7 months now YEPIEEE, it feels just right ya know, like I am finally conformable in my own skin
As a child, I always thought that since horses and cows were always kept together, and because at preschool you either got apple juice or milk, that cows made milk and horses made apple juice.
you’d need a bunch of male horses, but they CAN make “apple juice”
Where are horses and cows kept together? I don’t think I’ve ever seen a field with both horses and cows in it and I’ve seen a lot of cows and horses.
Barn
During the Gone Goose bit, I love the look on Elliot's face. He knows he's going to have to edit that in.
Wow so the mongoose comes out to you all feeling nice and safe and then you kick them out of the game? WOW TOM.
And then ate them.
@@E3kHatena Knowing Tomska, he probably vored, not ate them. Tomska needs to just come out with his vore kink, we accept him as he is 😆
Well at least he didn't eat him.
I'm really glad to see Sammy in videos they should bring him on more often he was a right laugh
Who's Sammy? Anyways Jeremy Irons was a riot in this one
My favorite Sammy joke of all time was the “faTHER?” from Any Regrets, he’s so good
He's really trying to grow his brand
who’s sammy
@@astro9340 quote Elliot from the Cunning Linguists episode, “you see, it’s the same joke again”
The Mongoose of Truth is the agender icon we all deserve
So glad to see that mongoose's coming out went smoothly ;;v;;
More like Zangoose lol
is your profile pic a wlw wooloo? because I love that
Is that how you're supposed to come out?
@@Spock149 wlwoo
Wooloo😊
Okay. There are four of us. I am a human, that guy's the Mongoose, and there are two snakes.
*Hmm.*
(I'm only kidding, this was so fun to watch. Content for the soul!!)
But fr what's the point of having 2 snakes in a 4 player game? Kind of misses the point
Like ok the mongoose doesn't know but still
@@YaamFel I think it’s meant to be a game for more people, but Tom could only get 4 people together/he can’t fit 4 people in his office.
You have 4 wolves inside you and some of them are snakes or mongooses… gets a bit confusing
To be fair, knowing the snakes are snakes doesnt help. The mongoose doesnt see the correct answer, so they still have to figure it out. The snakes, who know the answer can still manipulate them into getting it wrong.
Regarding the Egyptian question: considering that Heqet, ancient goddess of childbirth, was pictured as a frog headed woman, clearly frogs were familiar enough to the Egyptians from the yearly flooding of the Nile. Also there are a hedgehog species native to Egypt. As (like the mongoose) they hunt snakes, they were sacred to the sun god Ra, who was supposed to face the demon serpent Apep nightly.
I was not aware hedgehogs ate snakes 0.0
@@enbeast8350 Fun fact, hedgehogs have a slight natural immunity against some snake venoms.
@@enbeast8350 that's how sonic gets his speed
If someone starts the round with "I dont think it's XYZ" instead of "I think it's XYZ .." you are immediatly suspicious, and I am kinda sad it worked in the first round.
Why?
If you're not sure between the other two, but you're pretty sure it's not that one, of course you're going to say that. The alternative is to say nothing.
If anything I'd argue that makes someone less suspicious since it's ridiculous to think the snake would risk immediately outing themselves like that.
Basically, it's a bluffing game and all bluffing is complicated, you can't make statements like yours without there being numerous problems with them.
I think what's even more confusing is that the human didn't IMMEDIATELY know who the snakes were. It seems like a difficult game to actually screw up with only 4 players.
For example, with four people, two are snakes one is human and one is mongoose. If you are human, you know that you are human, therefore there can be no others. The mongoose's identity is revealed to everyone, so you know who the mongoose is. Therefore the last two must be snakes and are not to be trusted.
@@alansmithee419
The alternative is not to say nothing, it's to say that you are not sure. It's to say "I dont know".
It's to at least say, that you are unsure between 2 options.
Of course it's essentially the same, but the goal is not to exclude an answer, but to find the correct one.
It's not about the absolute value of the statement. It's about the implications and reading of a first suggestion.
Of course the goal can be to "bluff" people into picking the option you suggested is wrong on the assumption that these people already suspect you. But still that's something weird to do upfront.
Just because it's a bluffing game, doesnt mean that there aren't ways to control suspicion. Bein suspicious can be good and bad, but it's something to look out for.
The point still stands. I tend to distrust people more, if they try to discourage an option, especially when they dont have explicit knowledge, or can cite where you have learned that factoid.
The first question perfectly makes that point.
Eddie knew Wallpaper was wrong, so instead of nudging people towards answeres he knew were wrong, by saying he was considering two options over the other, he just out of the gate BOOM went "Nah it's not that one, source: trust me dude"
If it's bluffing, it's bad bluffing, is my point.
@@YTNFSCC Well all I know is that if I were given three things and told one of them was true, but there was one I was sure was wrong, I too would point that out in a heartbeat.
It's easy to rationalise that someone's behaviour is suspicious when you're already convinced (or in this case are fully aware) of their guilt.
finally found a way to get my hands on the muffin time card game so excited since I missed the kickstarter by 5 Minutes
Yo how? I’ve been trying for so long
@@smooz8809 where do you live?
@@badfox1133 "where do you live" 📸📸
Yeah I literally bought it last night from a supermarket. It was the only one there and it was marked down to clear so I took it as a sign and got it
@@roofogato Because if your not living on the british isles, in Australia or in the US it's much harder to get the game.
BTW, I absolutely loved the agender little sketch. It's just sweet to have trans jokes by cis people that are 1 actually funny and 2 not transphobic
that few seconds summed up the 6 months of my life and I love it
This is late, but I love the agender flag slowly showing up behind the mongoose while they were talking
Not only that, but they doubled down on it when they were removing the mongoose from the game, exclusively using they/them pronouns. Love it.
These guys are so genuinely nice, like the coming out of mongoose was so respectful and accurate ! It would have been easy for anyone to make a joke and be stupid with this subject but you managed to be funny AND respectful... Thank you!
Yes. Every life form is trying to evolve into crabs. And we have seen this in crustaceans almost identical to crabs that live in identical environments to crabs, causing them to become slightly more similar. Truly, conclusive evidence that all animals, every single one, are becoming crabs.
Kind of sus that the Mongoose comes out and “suddenly” they’re not needed anymore 😳
What is this? Almost every show, movie, media format that introduces a queer character?? And then the audacity to vore them at the end!
i can't believe thomas tomsk "a" ridgewell would do this..............
@@enbeast8350 god man i hate it when shows do that, why not eat them instead!?
Carcinization (or carcinisation) is an example of convergent evolution in which a crustacean evolves into a crab-like form from a non-crab-like form.
Has to be my favorite quote from Thomas Tomska Ridgewell: “As someone who has made a sandwich and then gone ‘hmmmm’”
Mongoose of Truth is the non-binary representation I've always needed.
He or she was fed a lie. Now his or her name has become a mere title of deception.
@@WaaDoku wat?
@@WaaDoku excuse me?
@@WaaDoku L
ghost in the form, of a mongoose,
The whole '''hard mood/gonegoose'' section of the vid may be one of my new favorite ''tomska and friends'' moments, i was struggling not to choke on my food from laughter
how do get to be on Content
can we please all agree that #CONTENT is the best series ever to grace the internet?
yes
I am being humble when I am telling you that I am the most powerful strongest coolest smartest most famous greatest funniest Y*uTub3r of all time! That's the reason I have multiple girlfriends and I show them off all the time! Bye bye sk
YES
But what about try hards o.o
I am Jeremy Irons and I agree.
You don't know how much I wanted Elliot to quote Jeremy Irons' infamous line from the opening of Dungeons and Dragons after pissing off Tom by continuing the joke. He failed all of us.
9:08 "I'm only playin' if we play hard mood!" That sounds more like Willie from The Simpsons than even Willie himself
tom's right about the crab thing, it's called convergent evolution
I love Tom's Big Brain play at the last question. Vehemently arguing against one option to make himself seem suspicious, then giving shit arguments, but that option was actually wrong.
for some reason it took me a full 50 seconds to realise eddie and sammy were different people even though I'm quite familiar with both
This seems like one of those games that's fun the first couple times, but once you've gone through all the cards and know all the answers you either have to buy expansion packs or never play the game ever again.
Love the energy Sammy brings.
Don’t you mean Jeremy Irons?
always!
6:54 is how you make a trans joke. Nothing at the expense of trans people, just light hearted joking based on how words sound. You love to see it
@TheSportsGuru what children's storybook comment? Timestamp?
@TheSportsGuru its a bible story that can’t be proved real, they weren’t even targeting a specific group of people with their jokes and they were literally discussing it in relation to the question.
@TheSportsGuru you make it seem that it was done because of malicious intent, it was a simple little statement I think you’re reading too much into it
@TheSportsGuru I disagree that this specific case is a double standard because I think the joke was meant to be sarcastic and not to be taken at face value. Even if it WAS from malicious intent to mock and belittle religion it’s a very minor jab at best and I don’t consider these small double standards something new or the downfall of humanity
@TheSportsGuru I meant that small double standards aren’t the cause of humanity’s downfall, and I rewatched it and it still feels to me like a part of the video that isn’t meant to be taken literally at face value. It may be just me but it seems like he knows that him saying the Bible is a children’s book is a hot take so he jokingly doubles down by saying “yeah I said it”
Tom going in on the frog spawn was a galaxy brain level move. He played those boys like a fiddle.
wait, logically, if there is 4 players, and one is guaranteed good (mongoose), and there are two snakes, then you not being the mongoose or snakes, you would know exactly who the snakes are, right?
Yes, but I think the idea is for the snakes to convince the humans that they aren’t snakes? Or at least that’s what I think it’s about 😂
This is doing my head in as well. Very confused
it'd probably be better with more but also consider the Mongoose doesn't know who the human is, and its likely to make the mongoose suspicious of you if your likr "WELL I'M HUMAN AND" so its better to just play as a better convincer than really go into the social deduction aspect of it at this size, but imagine teh chaos with like 6-12 people--
@@Draig44 well that and convincing the mongoose you arent a snake. im just the asshole who plays games like this and has to make the answers a logical thing
@@flicnerdy4385 oh yeah, im sure with that many people it would be a blast. im just the asshole that looks at the logistics of something and goes "hold on a sec"
15:19 that's a harsh callout right there, glad they can joke about this kind of thing, Tom seems like someone who would maybe take that to heart. Probably more than a decade of degrading comments on the internet toughened him up for it. Good on you guys for being able to make jokes like that about eachother.
As someone who's agender that was an absolutely hilarious joke 🤣🤣🤣
We stan great allies 😆 So glad they were able to come out and be accepted (and I hope you are out an accepted too!!)
that few seconds summed up the 6 months of my life and I love it
.kpm p8j 0ijokok
Ok
The beards just get longer down the line
exactly
The whole crab thing is an ACTUAL thing like some random sea animals always turned into crabs throught their evolution because it's just the best way to gain food have armor and move at the sea floor there was also a Now famous YT vid about it
God PLEASE have sammy on more episodes this was fucking HYSTERICAL
15:47
Mongoose of Truth : "Hey Tom, what would I need to do to get the game"
*Gets vored by Tom*
> Refuses to elaborate fuhrer
Tom Nazi conformed?!
0:39 Why does he say it so soberly. He sounds like you just told a five year old no Mcdonalds
I wanted to watch this right away, but I'm in the silent part of the library and the first minute has made me laugh out loud already, so that seems like danger 😂
Okay but riddle me this. If you are playing with 4 people, 2 snakes, and the mongoose of truth, and get ordinary human, wouldn't you be able to see who the mongoose is, and then know who the snakes are because you're the only ordinary human?
The word is carcinization. On multiple occasions, nature has evolved q creature into a crab-like creature, independent of other factors. Crabs truly are the most optimal lifeform.
Reject humanity, reject monke, advance to crab
Honestly how does this make sense with four players, the human is always gonna know who the snakes are, because they know they aren't one, and they know the mongoose isn't one, unless theres a variable amount of snakes they would always know that the remaining two players are the snakes.
6:59 the mongoose of truth really just said NB rights. Let’s go
"Everything evolves back into crabs." - Tom, saying a true fact, called carcinization.
10:32 The fact, often flanderised, is that _specifically crustaceans_ are always trying to evolve into crabs. Also, "always" is hyperbole, it's just somewhat frequently. So carcinisation never had any relevance to the question, but it's perfectly understandable how Tom got confused.
Editor got it right, good on em
15:46 my favorite part.
LOVE how you can feel how everyone is having so much fun, especially after the last year and a half ❤️
I take umbrage with that subtitle. I most certainly asked for this series
"Mozart doesn't induce labor." "He might!"
Damn, can't believe they managed to get THE Jeremy Irons on the show.
Tom’s strategy on the last round was actually brilliant. Being “caught” and using that to manipulate everyone was perfect.
TOM, I CAME AS FAST AS I COULD, and ur very cool my man-
Indeed he is.
Same
I fully agree of what you said 👍
Haha... came
Dang my comment is way too popular-
Things TomSka and friends and Markiplier and his friends have in common : funny, silly, handles trans jokes very well without being a pos about it, and loved by millions
The flum noise at 12:33 had me on the floor 😂😂😂😂😂😂
"You've got a bad case of war" Best CONTENT quote
14:29 Actually, the story of the plagues is true. There’s some debate of their exact nature and how many there were, but it really happened. The question is whether or not it was an act of god
11:05 it’s actually that all Crustaceans are trying to evolve into crabs
im so proud of the mongoose of truth
You've a bad condition of war! You need some gun paper! That'll make the memories go away! Best quote ever
I literally rewatched some lovely board games yesterday so this is just great.
The fucking Sammy wheeze is so good. The pure amount of idiocy is fascinating.
Also i just realized like 9 minutes into the video, the background is a green screen.
Just perfect.
Two videos?! So awesome. This is a fantastic video guys, also YOOOO SAMMY
7:43 also fucking hell LOL
Gotta say, basing it off of this video. This game seems like it’s really easy to know who’s a liar.
The mongoose announces themselves at the start of the round so you know they aren’t trying to lie to you.
And if you get the normal human character card, you know the other two people are the snakes. So it’s like, what’s the point?
yeah i was thinking the same thing
2:26 "play amongus"
I can always trust Tom and friends to come up with content that makes me cry from laughter
mongoose is the agender representation we didn't know we needed
Disadvantage of playing with 4 players, the guesser who is not the mongoose always knows who everyone is
I'm so happy that #CONTENT is back 😄
Its 5 am and I'm laughing at someone eating an (im assuming) wooden mongoose
I’m glad #CONTENT is coming back
Tom. You do know there is an Egyptian god that is a frog
I miss you Tom, surprise to see Sammy again
The Will McDaniel creation with a cowboy hat in the background fills me with joy
Looks like a cool game to play between friends :)
took me 10 min to realise they are actually in front of a green screen tho lol..
Idea for a longer form: 10 questions in a row without the actors being revealed until the end(except mongoose of course) in order: question > diskussion > answer repeat; points get tallied up in the end. The rest of the rules stay the same.
Jokes on the snakes, I never would’ve been fooled on the Egyptian question. Horrible histories has taught me my entire sum of history knowledge.
nice, an agender flag. when i thought i couldn't love the boys more, you present me with this. quality content right here!
heck yeah Agender pride WOOP WOOOP
I forgot about the bit with the agender mongoose so I'm glad I decided to watch this again during pride month
Absolutely loved this video Tom. Literally laughed my ass off. Good going man.
10:34 Tom showed how terminally online he is with the "everything is crab" bit
"In a kids story book"
Excuse me? Are you calling a book filled to the brim with genocide, slavery and war "a kids story book"?
Tom being honest as a snake to raise suspicion is such a 4d chess move, because who would expect the truth to be a misdirection?
Did Tom just call the Bible a kids story book
See, Tom? You have a fourth friend.
i got excited and thought there were 2 eddies but that disappeared when i looked again and saw that it was sammy
Tomska saying the choccy milk meme is just so satisfying - it fits so well with his voice
2:21 😳Amongus😳
2:26 😳Play Amongus😳
10:14 i like the fact the snakes are the same
*"And I'm Jeremy Irons"*
Fun fact, in the original hebrew, frog is referred to in the singular (i.e. a plague of frog), which some have interpreted as a single frog plaguing egypt rather than many.
im watching this instead of doing my algebra quiz 💀
I don’t frequent the channel, but I understand the rough history, and glad to see everyone is doing well. I hope it’s not bad for me to mention it. Im just glad other humans are doing well