The Rise and Fall of Secular Humanism: Only Two Religions with Peter Jones

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2022
  • To understand the society in which we live, it is important to understand the ideas and worldviews that have shaped our culture. In this message, Peter Jones explains the development of an ideology called secular humanism-the rejection of God and the elevation of human reason as our ultimate authority. Though it comes with many promises, this view of the world ultimately leaves people empty, alienated, and without answers to their deepest questions.
    This message is from Dr. Jones’ 12-part teaching series Only Two Religions. Learn more: www.ligonier.org/learn/series...

ความคิดเห็น • 173

  • @ligonier
    @ligonier  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This message is from Dr. Jones’ 12-part teaching series Only Two Religions. Watch the entire series: www.ligonier.org/learn/series/only-two-religions

  • @TexasTarheel60
    @TexasTarheel60 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Is this from the 90's? Apparently, we're seeing a resurgence of secular humanism!😮

  • @rogerthompson5250
    @rogerthompson5250 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Secular Humanism is still alive and well today.

    • @TheEverFreeKing
      @TheEverFreeKing ปีที่แล้ว +5

      My good friend it won't be though, the birth rate of secular people is too low to maintain it. The only people having replacement birth rates or higher are the religious especially the most devout.
      You're literally going extinct and being selected out by natural selection.
      Sure you see a decline in the western world but if you look at the long-term trends it is inevitable to fail, look up pew research and their data on the growth of religion in the next century.
      Most major religions are projected to grow massively especially in the third world and those third worlders are invading your secular nations because you need them to pay for your social services.

    • @AhmedHassan-sp1mx
      @AhmedHassan-sp1mx ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@TheEverFreeKing secularism was never good for humanity anyway

    • @christinacody8653
      @christinacody8653 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@TheEverFreeKing While that may be true, the percentage of people walking away from Christianity and identifying as Christian is also falling, so that means that there still is a place for the philosophy, if not the community.

    • @AGamingEntity
      @AGamingEntity ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@TheEverFreeKingThis is due to capitalism though

    • @sivaratnamasabaratnam8946
      @sivaratnamasabaratnam8946 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Secular humanism is a religion of egalitarian Corporates!

  • @EyeMixMusic
    @EyeMixMusic ปีที่แล้ว +11

    0:53: "Humanism and paganism are really the same". Humanism is the advocacy for moral goodness without recourse to religious doctrine. Paganism is a diverse range of spiritual traditions based on druidry, witchcraft and the worship of nature. While the two are not incompatible, they are fundamentally different in many ways. All Jones is doing here is confirming a) he knows nothing about humanism or paganism, and b) he'll lump anything together if it isn't Christian (watch him lazily toss in "Marxism" later on as well, which has nothing to do with humanism or paganism).

    • @detached
      @detached 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lumping all non Christian Worldviews together is the point of the series.

    • @BenjaminOrthodox
      @BenjaminOrthodox 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      they have the same spiritual origin.

    • @EyeMixMusic
      @EyeMixMusic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@BenjaminOrthodox Since paganism is spiritual and humanism non-spiritual, that statement is ignorant and self-evidently false.

  • @visamap
    @visamap 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you all very much for this, especially on this secular humanism. much more is needed. Thank u all very much for such profound discussions the world needs to know .

  • @apropos4701
    @apropos4701 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One would think we have no national surveys. All surveys show a decline of religious affiliation and a rise in affiliation with secular alternatives. For example, secular humanist weddings in Scotland now outnumber weddings performed at the national church and catholic churches combined.
    Nearly everything this man concludes is wrong, because he has not reckoned with the nature of the shift from religious to post-religious. Modern people are shifting from SUBMISSION to the spokesmen of an unseen god or gods to attain an unproven afterlife to CONSENSUS and mutual benefit among our very visible selves for this evident physical life.

  • @julesjgreig
    @julesjgreig 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @apropos4701
    @apropos4701 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The speaker is on the wrong side of the data. Sadly, institutional religion is in free fall and it won't miraculously bounce when it reaches the bottom.

    • @robertsouth6971
      @robertsouth6971 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Antique religion has the wrong vision of God and its death will open up space for a new vision of God because God is real and they have an outdated vision of It.

    • @bakkudeku
      @bakkudeku 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sadly? Not at all: fortunately and finally.

  • @learningpeace9788
    @learningpeace9788 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If there is no God, you can do whatever you want without fear or the responsibility to love.

    • @jeffwhited287
      @jeffwhited287 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Completely superficial and not at all true. Morality is not tied to a god, and gods, obviously, are not tied to morality. Look at history. Look at anthropology. Look at biology. Look at neuroscience. Look!

  • @Flags.crosses.trailerparks
    @Flags.crosses.trailerparks 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It isn’t falling. It’s climbing. Religion is dropping.

  • @Flags.crosses.trailerparks
    @Flags.crosses.trailerparks หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It never fell. The more the years go by, and our technical ability, increases, People will begin to understand that there is no God.

  • @OptimumGrow
    @OptimumGrow ปีที่แล้ว +9

    What is the actual argument put forth and defended here?.. This was just a listing of ideas he dislikes... Furthermore, he included A LOT of false/misleading definitions of those ideas he doesn't like.

  • @johnhaggerty4396
    @johnhaggerty4396 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Any new lecture by Dr. Peter Jones is an event. Thank you.

    • @jaxsazerac4904
      @jaxsazerac4904 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought Christopher Walken was giving the lecture

  • @Ark_bleu
    @Ark_bleu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow where’s the next one in the series?

  • @rhondae8222
    @rhondae8222 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What year was this video made?

  • @valroniclehre193
    @valroniclehre193 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Secular humanism is on the rise it seems. Embraced even by religious people for its utility. Its pretty simple. Work to make things better for people with the best tools you have. What would you prefer? Theocracy? Not a great track record on that one.

  • @k.s.obrien9459
    @k.s.obrien9459 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dr. Jones is excellent, thank you as always for your wonderful content. God bless.

  • @Reticulan1
    @Reticulan1 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The only thing I see falling are the numbers of people wasting away in church. Secular humanism is just a system for maximizing wellbeing without god, it's just people trying to find rational answers that don't require faith in magic. If you really love Jesus you should support anyone who wants to make the world better, why care what God or lack of god they attach to it? The only reason to want a monopoly on morality is to control the discourse.

    • @ttff-bd2yf
      @ttff-bd2yf ปีที่แล้ว

      Did Hitler's choices improve the economic and social situation of the Weimar Republic?

    • @christinacody8653
      @christinacody8653 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@ttff-bd2yf No. It privileged one grouping while disadvantaging another.

    • @sivaratnamasabaratnam8946
      @sivaratnamasabaratnam8946 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@christinacody8653 The disvantaged ones were previously took a lion share of advantage and feeding their family trees.

    • @BenjaminOrthodox
      @BenjaminOrthodox 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Contemporary generations in (post-)modern western civilization are decadent, that is why they leave the "churches" (catholic or protestant, but not Orthodox)
      Secular humanism is a worldview of materialism (atheism) which has nothing to do with rationalism (Descartes and Leibniz were Christians), but is positivistic (scientism).
      Jesus Christ preached the Gospel of the Kingdom of Heaven, which is not just about morality (are you ex-protestant?).
      - Post-modern Neo-Marxist argument against moral realism... leads to nihilistic relativism.

  • @lauren4434
    @lauren4434 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is Wantist or Wantism?

  • @abdullahahmed-hj5ke
    @abdullahahmed-hj5ke 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Dr. Jones is excellent, thank you as always for your wonderful content.

  • @williamcopeland6683
    @williamcopeland6683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm not entirely convinced there a fewer True Believers now than in the 70's.. but it is true that Church is much less popular so those non true believers that used to go to church have found other things to do

    • @Ezekai
      @Ezekai 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I get where you are coming from, but man I don't know. It almost seems that it is becoming harder and harder to find Christians who have the most basic understanding of Christian doctrine and theology, in fact most of them believe in heresy. I probably have to encounter over 10 confessing Christians before I find one that actually cares about his or her faith. It's just going to get worse because people will continue to gather teachers that will scratch their ears and will no longer hold to sound doctrine as Paul warns. It's just sad honestly.

    • @williamcopeland6683
      @williamcopeland6683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Ezekai as popularity wanes so does the intellectual prowess.. many who hung out at church in the 70's could still speak christianese'.. nowadays it's not popular.. i think Father has always had His Remnant

    • @Ezekai
      @Ezekai 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@williamcopeland6683 right, but seeing the increase is still sad, even if the increase might only be in the way which you say. It's just like the last few years-everything has been getting worse simultaneously- especially during the lockdown, it almost seems like a different world when comparing now to 2019. For example the ever expanding LGBTQ movement and its damage in Canada causing the ban of conversion therapy, etc.

    • @williamcopeland6683
      @williamcopeland6683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Ezekai we see through a glass darkly and are greived.. being evil.. can you imagine the Humiliation and Wrathful Righteous Anger and Brokenhearted Emotion from His perspective? Rather incredible.. been good chatting

    • @Ezekai
      @Ezekai 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@williamcopeland6683 definitely! Great talk man.

  • @backcountry8405
    @backcountry8405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow was so awesome the next thing i think we're going to have to deal with is Paganism I think but don't "me on it

    • @logicaldude3611
      @logicaldude3611 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don’t you realize that pretty much every ceremony, world event, etc is deeply entrenched in Paganism?
      There is an unholy alliance between Secularism, Satanism, and Paganism. It’s been going on for a very long time.

  • @itsgettingold
    @itsgettingold 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    The idea that secular humanism is declining is just flat out wrong. It is rising, worldwide, while belief in God falls precipitously.

    • @stwoods25
      @stwoods25 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I would have to agree with you friend.

    • @fromthesouthofafrica6815
      @fromthesouthofafrica6815 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It may be increasing in prevalence but it is an objective failure due to the fact that it promises people meaning and progress yet does the opposite.

    • @bethanyrachel4415
      @bethanyrachel4415 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually, he’s correct. We’re just too early in the process of the decline for most people to see it. I think our modern mental health crisis is a primordial scream that is going to ultimately show society that secular humanism is leading the world to a nihilistic worldview that they cannot accept. Hence the turn to spirituality and the occult.

    • @jhwilson00
      @jhwilson00 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Study birthrates and demographics.
      Its rising in areas of shrinking populations.
      There was a great book written by an atheist called Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth? Talked upon secularism growing in a shrinking pond.

    • @jaxsazerac4904
      @jaxsazerac4904 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ​@@stwoods25 You are wrong. People are rediscovering Religion while society decays all around them.

  • @Withernall
    @Withernall 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting talk.... some omissions to strength the points, but who doesn't do that....

  • @motorTranz
    @motorTranz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great lecture!

  • @commentator8724
    @commentator8724 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Secular humanism seems to be revived recently by Yuval Noah Harari, a trans humanist who thinks humans are soulless and hackable

    • @Yesica1993
      @Yesica1993 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He is one of the most dangerous men alive today. His book, Sapiens, is disturbing. He thinks human rights are a fiction.

    • @jaxsazerac4904
      @jaxsazerac4904 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you believe in nothing. You will believe in anything.

    • @bright5468
      @bright5468 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Yesica1993it IS a fiction. GOD, secular people making their own religions gods sake!
      I am an atheist btw. But camoon. İsnt it obvious?

    • @paulheydarian1281
      @paulheydarian1281 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bright5468
      What is camoon? 🤔

    • @robertsouth6971
      @robertsouth6971 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Yesica1993 Lies always lose because the truth will out. So no lie is dangerous in the long run. What is the value of belief that human rights exist separately from the will of God or the social contract? What, are they like Plato's perfect forms? One persons rights are just another person's obligations. These don't exist without people believing in them, including God among people. They are not part of nature.

  • @guyandcarmenschultz5712
    @guyandcarmenschultz5712 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is looks at what RC Sproul address in consequences of ideas. He looked at the faulty frameworks of the enlightenment regarding nature of man a neutral, good or even bad but able to decide good. These frameworks are taught in gradeschool, yet with CRT , there is a major issue. Ban those as well.

  • @christopherwaters8822
    @christopherwaters8822 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This speaker build so many straw men, seems to purposely miss represent what he is arguing against and gives misleading information, he should be considered a liar.

    • @jaxsazerac4904
      @jaxsazerac4904 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or he isn't saying what you want to hear. So you declare him as being wrong. Instead of denying your bias and admitting that he may be correct..

    • @randyr1952
      @randyr1952 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The ignorance of this guy is disappointing. Secular humanism is not allied with communism.

  • @Ark_bleu
    @Ark_bleu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There were more reasons to oppose the Vietnam war than communist sympathy. W

  • @brandyntherwanger5731
    @brandyntherwanger5731 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah this is so wrong. Secular humanism is thriving.

  • @irishwatchenthusiast6647
    @irishwatchenthusiast6647 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was a laughably poor attack on secular humanism. The religious traditions arose out of fear, ignorance and mythology. To suggest that morality ceases to exist without god is disingenuous to say the least - how weak Christians must be to require a cloud-dwelling police officer/judge to stop them from killing/stealing/lying... Hey - believe what you like - whatever gets you through the day annd helps you cope with your own mortality. However, this kind of unreflexive apologetics is sophistry of the most egregious kind.
    That Mr Jones has at one point to use what is basically a right wing dog whistle in associating secular humanism with Marxist Communism tells me all I need to know about the underpinnings of his delightfully unenlightened worldview. As we all know, religion has never been responsible for a single death...
    Dawkins may not be everyone's cup of tea (I like him), but his explanations for the fabulous complexity of life seem to me somewhat more plausible than that proffered by theists.
    He also didnt exactly condemn Senator McCarthy's witch hunt, either, did he? Yes, there were communists in America. So what? My preferred brand of democratic socialism puts people first - I'll take life in Denmark or Sweden and their political traditions over America's deluded push towards theocracy any day.
    Oh, and persecuting people who think differently in political terms has another name. Fascism.
    Bottom line - let's be nice to each other, but don't think you need to convince me of your 'truth'. I'm perfectly happy as a humanist.

  • @fernandogamboa2623
    @fernandogamboa2623 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Religion?? is not the gospel of Jesus Christ unique, Genesis to revelation? I prefer to say biblical Christianity .

    • @TheDrummaBen
      @TheDrummaBen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Calm down. The reformers all called it the “Christian religion”

  • @dccd673
    @dccd673 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve never heard of this man nor listened to him yet. I’ll come back when there are more comments lol

  • @Bill-dj9hv
    @Bill-dj9hv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am a humanist. This speaker makes his living from Christianity.

  • @jaxsazerac4904
    @jaxsazerac4904 ปีที่แล้ว

    McCarthy was right!

    • @paulheydarian1281
      @paulheydarian1281 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Did you discover a communist in your closet?

  • @wolfotero7261
    @wolfotero7261 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just bad reasoning. He started ok but then just went on a rent and told falsehoods

  • @ardbegthequestion
    @ardbegthequestion 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yeah… So first critique: at about six minutes into the video this fella seems to imply that the enlightenment was a affront to Christianity. Now I would hopefully think he could nuance this out, but it’s quite hilarious if he does indeed hold that the enlightenment is a factor in how big bad secular humanism is. This coming from a man wearing a bowtie in a theater of enlightenment, with people taking notes and books on their laps. A mesmerize crowd hanging on the words of a man, who most likely has an entire room in his house with bookshelves of theological tomes. Irony…
    Alrighty - twelve minutes in. One giant argument from ignorance.

    • @theburdenissweet5860
      @theburdenissweet5860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ad hominem?

    • @robmarshall956
      @robmarshall956 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s an amazing critique 🥳

    • @ardbegthequestion
      @ardbegthequestion 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theburdenissweet5860 - maybe, which point though? Guy dissing enlightenment whilst looking the part? Just a hilarious observation.

    • @kyloooooo
      @kyloooooo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This fella? His name is Peter Jones, Mr Jones to you, it's literally in the video title. How ignorant.

    • @ardbegthequestion
      @ardbegthequestion 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kyloooooo - Sorry, did I disrespect your guy? I saw his name, I chose to say 'fella' intentionally to show that I have no idea who this is, nor do I care honestly. But feel free to dismiss me even quicker, I get it, I'm just some rando from the internet.

  • @jeremyp1536
    @jeremyp1536 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This guy states so many incorrect statements about atheism being a religion that's incorrect. This lecture feels bias and unrationally based on false religious ideologues

    • @ronaldcuriel4398
      @ronaldcuriel4398 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You need faith to believe in atheism. Atheism epistemology is based on faith of logic.

    • @jeremyp1536
      @jeremyp1536 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ronaldcuriel4398 you need no faith to not believe in anything. You don't have faith for not believing in unicorns.

    • @ronaldcuriel9451
      @ronaldcuriel9451 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jeremyp1536that's a logical contradiction. Of course you need faith to believe as an atheist or being agonistic.

    • @jeremyp1536
      @jeremyp1536 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don't need faith to not believe something. Sorry but you are factually incorrect, there are no contradictions. I don't need faith to NOT believe that invisible unicorns are real. The onus of proof sits on the claimant not the nonbeliever as such no faith is required. @@ronaldcuriel9451

  • @GreyrainLife
    @GreyrainLife 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This guy is the product of a thankfully dying age. Secular humanism is in no way dying. The number of people who claim no religious belief is growing every year around the world. It is religion, particularly monotheistic abrahamic religion, which is dying in every country in which belief is not enforced at gunpoint.

    • @sabhishek9289
      @sabhishek9289 ปีที่แล้ว

      Really lol? Huge numbers of Iranian and middle eastern ex Muslims have converted to Christianity. Huge numbers of Chinese people have converted to Christianity. Seoul capital of South Korea is basically so Christian that it is literally called East Jerusalem. There are large numbers of Indians who have converted to Christianity especially North East India is full of Christians. You are living in your own bubble not in reality.

  • @mariaw5739
    @mariaw5739 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LOL, HES A FOOL? RIGHT>

  • @user-lx7rr5to8x
    @user-lx7rr5to8x 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awful, arrogant misinformation

    • @stephanieheining9257
      @stephanieheining9257 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please explain the accurate information.

  • @axellludvic3490
    @axellludvic3490 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Completely false. Religion is on the decline in most advanced societies.

  • @JonathanPhillips-fh6cq
    @JonathanPhillips-fh6cq หลายเดือนก่อน

    he is too dry and lifeless.