God save the king! Who'll be king but Charlie? Proud descendant of Cavaliers who fought for Stuart in the 1600s, Cavaliers who fought for Washington in the 1700s, and Cavaliers who fought for Lee in the 1800s!
Do you happen to have the full album for this? I've been trying to look everywhere for more of this band's albums outside of the 8 that were uploaded to TH-cam on a small channel.
Unfortunately, I do not possess the album. I had found this Song in the album "farewell musket, pike & drum", that is presumably from the channel you mentioned.
What Booker doth prognosticate Concerning kings’ or kingdoms’ fate? I think myself to be as wise As he that gazeth on the skies; My skill goes beyond the depth of a Pond, Or Rivers in the greatest rain, Thereby I can tell all things will be well When the King enjoys his own again. Though for a time we see Whitehall With cobwebs hanging on the wall Instead of silk and silver brave, Which formerly it used to have, With rich perfume in every room,- Delightful to that princely train, Which again you shall see, when the time it shall be, That the King enjoys his own again. Full forty years the royal crown Hath been his father’s and his own; And is there any one but he That in the same should sharer be? For who better may the sceptre sway Than he that hath such right to reign? Then let’s hope for a peace, for the wars will not cease Till the King enjoys his own again. Though people now walk in great fear Along the country everywhere, Thieves shall then tremble at the law, And justice shall keep them in awe: The Frenchies shall flee with their treacherie, And the foes of the King ashamed remain: The which you shall see when the time it shall be That the King enjoys his own again. The Parliament must willing be That all the world may plainly see How they shall labour still for peace, That now these bloody wars may cease; For some will gladly spend their lives to defend The King in all his right to reign: So then I can tell all things will be well When the King enjoys his own again. When all these things to pass shall come Then farewell Musket, Pick, and Drum, The Lamb shall with the Lion feed, Which were a happy time indeed. O let us all pray we may see the day That peace may govern in his name, For then I can tell all things will be well When the King enjoys his own again. Also, England was never an absolute monarchy, as unlike France, the English nobility were not weak, they were more organised and less factionalised than their French counterparts. From the mid 16th century England had doubled down on parliamentary monarchy, which is the form of monarchy England had been since at least the 13th century. Its by this time, the mid 16th.c, that "the "King in Parliament" held supreme legislative authority" was established and by this phrase two competing interpretations would be born. If we were to simplify, the augment was "whether the final decision-maker was the king alone, or the King, Lords, and Commons in parliament." The Parliamentarians sought not "greater parliamentary power" but rather "the supremacy of the King in Parliament over the King out of Parliament." Charles I had bad relations with his parliaments unlike Henry VII who had far better relations with his, while Henry was charismatic enough to often get his parliaments onside in a whole manner of things, Charles, with his stammer, was not. His attempt at autocratic rule failed while creating a greater rift with his parliaments and nobility. We all know where he ends up in the end. Also there was no "reintroducing of Catholicism" Charles, despite his many shortcomings, was a devout Anglican. Oliver Cromwell only became Lord Protector in 1653 after the disaster that was the Rump Parliament. In fact the Rump is the reason why the structures of the Protectorate were setup in 1653 and apart from small changers like the re-establishing a House of Peers and the Humble Petition and Advice, this lasted until 1659 when the army forced Richard to resign, and they promptly reinstated the Rump which then sent everything back to effectively how it was from 1649 to 1653, with the same effect, except there now is no Oliver Cromwell to restore order, so only real option was restoration, which promptly happened in 1660, though they backdated Charles II to immediately after his fathers death in 1649.
First off all: Thank you that you brought up the correct lyrics, I wasn't aware that this version from Strawhead was so different to the regular one. Secondly: There is no doubt that Charles I. was a high Anglican (maybe even a crypto Catholic, who knows?) but he was none the less aiding Anti-Calvinists, had being friendly towards the Catholics and even married an Catholic Queen Mary from France from the house of Bourbon. All of this made his opponents fear that he might reintroduce Catholicism but as we all know Charles never had the Intension to mass revert his subjects. A bit sloppy of myself not to mension the full context in the discription. And finally: How much time did you use to write all of that?!?
God Save the King! I absolutely adore this song, I've always been a proud loyalist of the British Monarchy and the House of Stuart
God save the king! Who'll be king but Charlie?
Proud descendant of Cavaliers who fought for Stuart in the 1600s, Cavaliers who fought for Washington in the 1700s, and Cavaliers who fought for Lee in the 1800s!
God Save the King! I love this song, I've always been a proud loyalist.
Do you happen to have the full album for this? I've been trying to look everywhere for more of this band's albums outside of the 8 that were uploaded to TH-cam on a small channel.
Unfortunately, I do not possess the album. I had found this Song in the album "farewell musket, pike & drum", that is presumably from the channel you mentioned.
Long live the king 🇨🇱❤️🇬🇧
One of my favorite songs!
What Booker doth prognosticate
Concerning kings’ or kingdoms’ fate?
I think myself to be as wise
As he that gazeth on the skies;
My skill goes beyond the depth of a Pond,
Or Rivers in the greatest rain,
Thereby I can tell all things will be well
When the King enjoys his own again.
Though for a time we see Whitehall
With cobwebs hanging on the wall
Instead of silk and silver brave,
Which formerly it used to have,
With rich perfume in every room,-
Delightful to that princely train,
Which again you shall see, when the time it shall be,
That the King enjoys his own again.
Full forty years the royal crown
Hath been his father’s and his own;
And is there any one but he
That in the same should sharer be?
For who better may the sceptre sway
Than he that hath such right to reign?
Then let’s hope for a peace, for the wars will not cease
Till the King enjoys his own again.
Though people now walk in great fear
Along the country everywhere,
Thieves shall then tremble at the law,
And justice shall keep them in awe:
The Frenchies shall flee with their treacherie,
And the foes of the King ashamed remain:
The which you shall see when the time it shall be
That the King enjoys his own again.
The Parliament must willing be
That all the world may plainly see
How they shall labour still for peace,
That now these bloody wars may cease;
For some will gladly spend their lives to defend
The King in all his right to reign:
So then I can tell all things will be well
When the King enjoys his own again.
When all these things to pass shall come
Then farewell Musket, Pick, and Drum,
The Lamb shall with the Lion feed,
Which were a happy time indeed.
O let us all pray we may see the day
That peace may govern in his name,
For then I can tell all things will be well
When the King enjoys his own again.
Also, England was never an absolute monarchy, as unlike France, the English nobility were not weak, they were more organised and less factionalised than their French counterparts. From the mid 16th century England had doubled down on parliamentary monarchy, which is the form of monarchy England had been since at least the 13th century.
Its by this time, the mid 16th.c, that "the "King in Parliament" held supreme legislative authority" was established and by this phrase two competing interpretations would be born. If we were to simplify, the augment was "whether the final decision-maker was the king alone, or the King, Lords, and Commons in parliament." The Parliamentarians sought not "greater parliamentary power" but rather "the supremacy of the King in Parliament over the King out of Parliament."
Charles I had bad relations with his parliaments unlike Henry VII who had far better relations with his, while Henry was charismatic enough to often get his parliaments onside in a whole manner of things, Charles, with his stammer, was not.
His attempt at autocratic rule failed while creating a greater rift with his parliaments and nobility. We all know where he ends up in the end. Also there was no "reintroducing of Catholicism" Charles, despite his many shortcomings, was a devout Anglican.
Oliver Cromwell only became Lord Protector in 1653 after the disaster that was the Rump Parliament. In fact the Rump is the reason why the structures of the Protectorate were setup in 1653 and apart from small changers like the re-establishing a House of Peers and the Humble Petition and Advice, this lasted until 1659 when the army forced Richard to resign, and they promptly reinstated the Rump which then sent everything back to effectively how it was from 1649 to 1653, with the same effect, except there now is no Oliver Cromwell to restore order, so only real option was restoration, which promptly happened in 1660, though they backdated Charles II to immediately after his fathers death in 1649.
First off all: Thank you that you brought up the correct lyrics, I wasn't aware that this version from Strawhead was so different to the regular one.
Secondly: There is no doubt that Charles I. was a high Anglican (maybe even a crypto Catholic, who knows?) but he was none the less aiding Anti-Calvinists, had being friendly towards the Catholics and even married an Catholic Queen Mary from France from the house of Bourbon. All of this made his opponents fear that he might reintroduce Catholicism but as we all know Charles never had the Intension to mass revert his subjects. A bit sloppy of myself not to mension the full context in the discription.
And finally: How much time did you use to write all of that?!?
GSTK