This game definitely looks better in third person. Ubisoft should update it and create an option. It could take months from now to deliver the update but definitely worth reconsidering.
I see a lot of comments on here trashing the stroy, but honestly i have hope, and normally I'd agree since Ubisoft couldn't add actual depth to this game on their own. However Cameron was heavily involved in the story since the game is going to be part of the Avatar cannon, so the story might just be good and engaging. Not getting my hopes up, but considering I've been a fan since watching the original in theaters back in '08, i preordered just for the cool factor of an open world Avatar game. We'll see if it holds up.
the skybox is bland and doesnt reflect well down on the trees. hence the disconnected look. I also thought the graphics esp when flying, look like from 2016. on foot it seems good. Also thanks to ubisoft's janky animations. There seems to be a lack of global illumination from the skybox. seems like they wanted to look like Horizon Forbidden West and stopped developing midway.
Agreed. Clearing territory to obtain the resources that could be the solution to humanities power crisis could be a good story line. The planet is rich with resources for humans to use, and possibly fix many issues plaguing humanity.
@@nightstepstation7189Yeah explain how a small developer team made better flying mechanics and better looking dragons with better movements and animations than a multi billion dollar company
The reason this game is in first person is because this game is made by 3D engineers and not gamers. 1st person is good for online shooters, 3rd person needs to be added because people want to engage with the character and environment. If I wanted to be Avatar I would play it on VR. This game needs to be like Horizon Zero Dawn. It sucs that there are psychopath lead developer snobs out there with bad visions that don't care about what others want. Your reckless decisions will be felt financially. I feel bad for other engineers that have put hard work in this. Get rid of these toxic lead developers!
I’m going to be honest, I don’t really see why everyone’s moaning about the game being a “far cry game” the far cry series is a very successful game fair to say some titles are better than others but the majority of far cry games are great in my opinion of course that is subjective to what you like but the 3rd person view I can understand to a point although with first person games you are so much more engaged with the environment and with a game like avatar I feel it’s the right move to make the game first person sure it would be a bonus if there was a third person tab so gamers had the option but I don’t think it’s that important. Overall I’m excited to try the game when it launches and hope people come to realise that almost every new game coming out and that has been released has a lot of similarities with previous titles. Thanks
@@lm4585 That’s fair you like what you like I guess, fair to say Ubisoft has made some terrible games in the past but they did create in my opinion one of the best story’s in the gaming industry and that’s assassins creed I am a die hard fan of assassins creed although the past few games have been terrible and a disappointment knowing the potential that Ubisoft has but at the end of it all the developers are one great game away from gaining back fans and trust
@@Oznerol1234 Buddy absolutely I’m not denying that other developers and engines could have done things differently and definitely improved on a lot for this game but it falls back to the same stuff guerrilla game correct me if I’m wrong are owned by Sony and if they made avatar with their engine then it would be a PS5 exclusive which would suck
Third person is not important **to you** but it is to some people. First person is more immersive *to you** but it is NOT to some people. The peripheral view of third feels more correct to the square window you get in first. First person here also loses a sense of scale. This just seems like a regular size human with blue hands.
does anyone else think that ubisoft makes beautiful worlds that have zero depth and get boring after playing for like 2 hours? meanwhile other developers like rockstar or remedy games ... hell even bethesda ... they make ok/beautiful worlds with a lot of depth to them
I love and always prefer third person games but I can understand the decision because it is just more immersive and you see the beautifull open world you just cant see your character.
It feels low quality, like almost every Ubisoft game. The lightning, the animations, the shadows, ... it all feels cheap. I don't know if they should be doing this game, it's too big for them. Feels like a 2010 game
Play the game trough, make a judgement, start a comparison. Not the other way round. And if I remember correctly, CP 2077 was a COMPLETE mess on its release date
The hype for this game and the trailer looked so good, but after watching this gameplay, it's a no from me. The game also only takes around 10 hours to complete, so it's definitely not worth it.
@@korosibotond4574There was some misinformation spreading about the game recently. Turns out the “10-15 hours to beat it” was actually the Avatar game released back in 2009. Besides, it should be pretty common sense anyway that Ubisoft games take awhile to finish.
@@TheCeraizationwhere do you get your informations from? Do you have a link? Or is it confirmed? Or just a rumor youve heard? This would be pretty bad. 10 hours for a 100 euro game. I just wanted to buy this game but now Im not sure anymore
@@TheCeraization from what I can see the people say its 10 - 15 hours for story and up 40 h when making side missions etc. this is not confirmed. But still 10 hours main story is nothing for me. Im pretty pissed right now 😣
I just feel like after a few minutes of flying around in the “open world” I will start to get bored. If this game had come out a long time ago I would’ve enjoyed it more, but there are far better open world game options with more substance like Spider-Man 2 or hell even the new Hogwarts game. Nothing would make me want to walk around an open world that’s a forest.
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora was mid, It looked amazing, yes, it had beautifull landscapes and a extraordinary visual world, also yes. But I think it would be so much better if there were more "earth like" missions and locations, not just infiltrate and capture RDA generic bases. I mean, it would be cool to explore locations that are like giant RDA facilites, or vehicles, or ships, or even mission as a human in the Earth.
i cant believe the sound is shit like in valhalla. they compress it so much. i feel like im hearing .wav after being recorded by a phones mic. such a pitty they dont care ...
The game doesnt seem spectacular at all. Animations/graphics & the overall feel doesn't look too promising. I'll reserve my judgement until the reviews are out.
SERIES X: THE BEST WAY TO PLAY AVATAR!!! An RTX 4080's MSRP is $1200!!! Which is what is recommended for 4K @60 on PC. That's just the GPU. Not to mention everything else needed for your rig. A case, RAM and on and on. OR...you can play Avatar in 4K @60 on SX for $500! And it even includes a 4K movie player!!! Bottom line...PC gaming is for the rich and a waste of money!
The difference is that Xbox will have worse graphics than PC. You could probably play 4k60 on all low on a 30 series. Also, there's no need to play 4k unless you have a rather large screen, I'd say over 30 inches, and at that point you wouldn't be sitting right in front of it so lower settings won't be as noticeable. All in all, if you're not a casual gamer you should get a PC, if you are a casual gamer than you should get an Xbox. It's really as easy as that
@@sisenaoyagi8027 //dont give a shit about k4// That's 4K, not K4. I don't care either. My point was for those who DO care, they're spending too much when they can have amazing resolution and FPS for a fraction of the cost. In my book, that's called stupid!
@@Shovker27 YOU SAY, ''The difference is that Xbox will have worse graphics than PC.'' ME: Consoles have reached a point of such gorgeous visuals now, that whatever ''difference'' you think there is, is meaningless. And PC gamers are spending a fortune to obtain it. That's a sign of stupidity! YOU SAY, ''You could probably play 4k60 on all low on a 30 series.'' ME: An RTX 4080 is hardly ''low end''! And that's the recommended requirement for Avatar. And the MSRP is $1200. Again, that's just for a GPU. Now you need all the other stuff for your rig. Thousands just to say, ''look at my 4K''! Can we say...STUPID? YOU SAY, ''Also, there's no need to play 4k unless you have a rather large screen, I'd say over 30 inches'' ME: Strawman argument. My comment was not about what YOU personally feel is a need. It was aimed at PC gamers who WANT 4K. Pay attention when you read comments. What YOU want is irrelevant. BTW...my flat screen is 65''! YOU SAY, ''and at that point you wouldn't be sitting right in front of it so lower settings won't be as noticeable.'' ME: So now you know where everyone in the entire world sits, in relation to their TV. How do you see inside billions of homes at once? BTW...I sit close to my 65''. YOU SAY, ''All in all, if you're not a casual gamer you should get a PC, if you are a casual gamer than you should get an Xbox. It's really as easy as that'' ME: I am a hardcore gamer. And I got XSX because I get amazing visuals, smooth FPS and a 4K movie player all for $500. Spending thousands on a gaming rig is STUPID. It's really as simple as THAT!
They is didn’t even bother to animate a fourth finger. Lol what an unfinished mess. OMFG they have blue skin to clearly some sort of graphical glitch 🤦
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora Full game PART 1: th-cam.com/video/p31rs8J8gD0/w-d-xo.html
Enjoy :) my First 2 hours walkthrough of the game
not bad Graphics are useless if the Game itself are shit^^
This game definitely looks better in third person. Ubisoft should update it and create an option. It could take months from now to deliver the update but definitely worth reconsidering.
I agree!
I agree
Most definitely !
Yeah
Its what they should've done in the beginning
That music from 1:27-2:53 was so friggin’ beautiful!!!
the musics in these games are so cool ! i cant wait to listen to the full soundtrack
@@jenesaispasquoimettre1I know!!! The main game theme even has hints of the movie theme too. I can’t wait for the 8th
Shit got me emotional lol damn
Lol idk bout emotional but the music was nice
Ubisoft always manages to make beautiful looking games that incredibly shallow and repetitive content wise. This one will be no different
True that it’s like their signature.
Tbf, it would be unwise for them to change their formula on such a big IP like Avatar.
Thats why im waiting until this game is under 30$ maybe 20$
this look's different and amazing stop complaining
@@TzsNatureWithJameelFarkey word LOOKS, but it is not
Definitely imagine a avatar game like this when i was younger 🔥🔥
But still had third person
@@BeSlight9 yeah but this close fr
Had a game on ps3 and that’s third person
@rootlessbwoy6141 I know that but it don't look good like this one
@@TayRich93so stop complaining. The game wasn’t meant to be 3rd person and never will
I see a lot of comments on here trashing the stroy, but honestly i have hope, and normally I'd agree since Ubisoft couldn't add actual depth to this game on their own. However Cameron was heavily involved in the story since the game is going to be part of the Avatar cannon, so the story might just be good and engaging. Not getting my hopes up, but considering I've been a fan since watching the original in theaters back in '08, i preordered just for the cool factor of an open world Avatar game. We'll see if it holds up.
Natural + Technology = Amazing Game.
We got so bored that we returned to - Nature
Yeah nature is beautiful but technology is needed as well
@@Viilap yeah
@@Viilapnot really
@@Viilapit’s not a necessity clearly
People forget the greatest technologie ever created, themselves as nature everything else is just a byproduct
This game would've been a day 1 buy for me...but that first person view is a BUST.
Same here, bro. It killed my interest in the game.
It's not going to have third person?
cope
@MustardSkaven Unfortunately not and i hate FP games with a passion.
@@MustardSkaven no, man 😞 such a bummer.
This game manages to sort of look really good but also really ass
My exact thoughts 😂
i think it’s the flying that’s throwing me off, but i think the world is gonna be beautiful and p fun to explore let’s hope lol
the skybox is bland and doesnt reflect well down on the trees. hence the disconnected look. I also thought the graphics esp when flying, look like from 2016. on foot it seems good. Also thanks to ubisoft's janky animations. There seems to be a lack of global illumination from the skybox. seems like they wanted to look like Horizon Forbidden West and stopped developing midway.
I don’t care what anyone says…I’m getting this game once it comes out
No one stopping you
@@jayjr I was just saying. I don't care what people say. I'm trying it for my own experience
quote
Did you get it?
Kind of wish there was an option to play as the humans. Would've loved to roam around in an AMP suit.
Agreed. Clearing territory to obtain the resources that could be the solution to humanities power crisis could be a good story line. The planet is rich with resources for humans to use, and possibly fix many issues plaguing humanity.
@@natebit8130 colonizer mindset
@@plaguedsystem3233 Glory to the God Emperor of Mankind!
@@plaguedsystem3233 waaa
I bet there'll be such option as DLC
they mess up the flying everytime i see. It looks like moving in Blender program, not flying a heavy beast.
Stop crying. Go play Century of ashes.
@@nightstepstation7189Yeah explain how a small developer team made better flying mechanics and better looking dragons with better movements and animations than a multi billion dollar company
@nightstepstation7189 we can cry all we want its our money we spend on it this is a multi billion dollar company. Stop settling.
tbf the ikrans are not necessarily "heavy". They are incredibly nimble creatures
@@Karugulthey are a multi billion dollar company for a reason. Either play the game or don’t. If you chose not to then it’s your loss
Less than a week now. Excited to play this, gonna set my alarm Thursday to play it!
Far cry pandora
Not really but ok
@Hitman88889 it looks just like far cry
@@natecaballero1687in what way last time ik you can’t fly a animal on far cry
@@yoSevZmaybe not an animal but you do get choppers... just another means of travel but in a new form
You ain't wrong. It really is farcry but just blue.
Bluecry
This looks incredible
but the gameplay is horrible^^
Yeah graphics is fire
Top
The reason this game is in first person is because this game is made by 3D engineers and not gamers. 1st person is good for online shooters, 3rd person needs to be added because people want to engage with the character and environment. If I wanted to be Avatar I would play it on VR. This game needs to be like Horizon Zero Dawn. It sucs that there are psychopath lead developer snobs out there with bad visions that don't care about what others want. Your reckless decisions will be felt financially. I feel bad for other engineers that have put hard work in this. Get rid of these toxic lead developers!
I wish the game had a third-person toggle. Im still gonna enjoy the game, but third person wouldve been a lot better.
I never knew about this game until today.
Cool?
@@strikerbowls791don't comment then...
better you still dont know the game^^
Yeah cool game
I’m going to be honest, I don’t really see why everyone’s moaning about the game being a “far cry game” the far cry series is a very successful game fair to say some titles are better than others but the majority of far cry games are great in my opinion of course that is subjective to what you like but the 3rd person view I can understand to a point although with first person games you are so much more engaged with the environment and with a game like avatar I feel it’s the right move to make the game first person sure it would be a bonus if there was a third person tab so gamers had the option but I don’t think it’s that important. Overall I’m excited to try the game when it launches and hope people come to realise that almost every new game coming out and that has been released has a lot of similarities with previous titles. Thanks
I don't like Far Cry. I hate the Ubi formula in general but I am interested in this game since its Avatar.
A gameplay more like horizon zero dawn would have been more fitting
@@lm4585 That’s fair you like what you like I guess, fair to say Ubisoft has made some terrible games in the past but they did create in my opinion one of the best story’s in the gaming industry and that’s assassins creed I am a die hard fan of assassins creed although the past few games have been terrible and a disappointment knowing the potential that Ubisoft has but at the end of it all the developers are one great game away from gaining back fans and trust
@@Oznerol1234 Buddy absolutely I’m not denying that other developers and engines could have done things differently and definitely improved on a lot for this game but it falls back to the same stuff guerrilla game correct me if I’m wrong are owned by Sony and if they made avatar with their engine then it would be a PS5 exclusive which would suck
Third person is not important **to you** but it is to some people. First person is more immersive *to you** but it is NOT to some people. The peripheral view of third feels more correct to the square window you get in first. First person here also loses a sense of scale. This just seems like a regular size human with blue hands.
This ubisoft game seems to have put a lot of effort into the BGM.
Please what do you mean by BGM?
@@JesusPlsSaveMebackground music
As usual. Ubi never slouches on their OSTs
Something about this game looks off and I can’t place my finger on it. I’m getting 6/10 vibes here guys.
graphics esp when flying look like a significant downgrade. Maybe its the lighting but it looks like a 2016 game.
from my critical viewpoint my opinion is that i dont really have an opinion cause i have mixed feeling about this game
I dare say that this game will be one of the better ones from Ubisoft💙
The alien plants are dancing... Cool!
The flight looks so clunky 😂, like it’s great music but it doesn’t seem immersive lol
Ever hear of patch updates from developers?
@@TheChubbyGhost I guess you’re okay with developers setting the bar low on launch
ever heard of quality? Guess not.@@TheChubbyGhost
does anyone else think that ubisoft makes beautiful worlds that have zero depth and get boring after playing for like 2 hours? meanwhile other developers like rockstar or remedy games ... hell even bethesda ... they make ok/beautiful worlds with a lot of depth to them
This looks a cut above the rest of their stuff, but I'll reserve judgement until it's out.
it sure would be nice if you stated what hardware you're currently this on so we can get an idea of how this game will run on our rigs..
I don’t understand why you’d make such a beautiful open world but make the player play in first person instead of 3rd person
I love and always prefer third person games but I can understand the decision because it is just more immersive and you see the beautifull open world you just cant see your character.
Yeah it's a lot more immersive than 3rd person perspective, for sure.
Because that makes it more immersive, if it was third person you wouldn't really notice how beautiful the world actually is
It feels low quality, like almost every Ubisoft game. The lightning, the animations, the shadows, ... it all feels cheap. I don't know if they should be doing this game, it's too big for them. Feels like a 2010 game
Not sure if I'm gonna enjoy playing this
The open world concept is cool but after a few minutes of exploring it will get boring no?
@@TannerMcCoyOfficial”no?” Are you asking someone to validate what you said? What’s the point of saying it? No feelings of your own
@@TheTruth-13 I’m confused by your reply.
@@TannerMcCoyOfficial exploring looks mid gameplay seems slow this would've been fun if it was a bit more fast paced
Parkour and all would suit avatars theme too (imo)
How does it look good and mid at the same time??
Gutes Video
This is the ONLY thing Ubisoft does well... Graphics.
can you change it's color tho? I'd have liked the yellow ones in the back.
You can but I don’t think you can have a black one
@@crazylazylee892 sad, but I don't think a black ikran would look good in any case.
Looks decent, waiting until its for sale under 30$
This is just a modern version of like Drakenguard except you go into FPS shooter mode instead of Hack and slash mode haha I dig it.
Far cry 7 : Frontiers of pandora
I'm ok with that. I love Farcry. 🥰
SPECSAVERS 🤓
I have this game too but my ikran is pink and her name is fury
Where is the Aang?
😂😂😂😂
Kinda glad i saved my money
Looks like a blue Lara Croft from Tomb Raider 2005.
FOV Slider for console?
The far background looks like Borderlands
I love it
there are outposts even in this game so shit :D
Cyberpunk 2077 is still better than this and they’re both first person games with tons to explore.
Play the game trough, make a judgement, start a comparison. Not the other way round. And if I remember correctly, CP 2077 was a COMPLETE mess on its release date
Hey look, it Farcry Primal. Press "X" to tame beast. 😂
Where do find this game? Or Ubisoft have given you!
It hasn’t come out yet broddie
@@Jared_ehn How does he play then?
If mid was a game
Bet you the skill tree is an actual tree in this game.
The hype for this game and the trailer looked so good, but after watching this gameplay, it's a no from me. The game also only takes around 10 hours to complete, so it's definitely not worth it.
I googled it it takes around 40-45 hours to comete the story so I dont know why your hating on the game before it even came out....
@@korosibotond4574 40 hours for 100%, 10 hours just for story :)
@@korosibotond4574There was some misinformation spreading about the game recently. Turns out the “10-15 hours to beat it” was actually the Avatar game released back in 2009. Besides, it should be pretty common sense anyway that Ubisoft games take awhile to finish.
@@TheCeraizationwhere do you get your informations from? Do you have a link? Or is it confirmed? Or just a rumor youve heard? This would be pretty bad. 10 hours for a 100 euro game. I just wanted to buy this game but now Im not sure anymore
@@TheCeraization from what I can see the people say its 10 - 15 hours for story and up 40 h when making side missions etc. this is not confirmed. But still 10 hours main story is nothing for me. Im pretty pissed right now 😣
I just feel like after a few minutes of flying around in the “open world” I will start to get bored.
If this game had come out a long time ago I would’ve enjoyed it more, but there are far better open world game options with more substance like Spider-Man 2 or hell even the new Hogwarts game.
Nothing would make me want to walk around an open world that’s a forest.
Avatar cutscenes of Pandora
Would have definitely preferred a 3rd person game
option of third person or a forced 1st person perspective view?
Looks ass ngl. They should’ve given this project way more time…
Vr available?
Nope
Who knows, maybe if this version sales a lot of copies, then they update it with an vr update for about 30 €
Is this PC or PS5?
60fps on console?
This is literally a reskin of Far Cry lmao
SPECSAVERS 🤓
@Bacon-n-Eggs look at the movement, its literally far cry bro.
It's look like a PS3 game xD ubisoft
What quest is this like what number
11/30
Dang video games are extremely overpriced
I'm going to name my ikran Telisi
What system is this gameplay on?
its going to be released on pc, PS5, and Xbox series S/X
Is it me or the graphics dropped alot from the previous gameplay????
They need to tone down those horrible quest markers 🤮
Is that all the Ikran names we will get? 😢
It feels like video games these days are just so sloppy and not finished. The physics in this game look like garbage.
yawn
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora was mid, It looked amazing, yes, it had beautifull landscapes and a extraordinary visual world, also yes. But I think it would be so much better if there were more "earth like" missions and locations, not just infiltrate and capture RDA generic bases. I mean, it would be cool to explore locations that are like giant RDA facilites, or vehicles, or ships, or even mission as a human in the Earth.
Looks like the very first TUROK 64
Another round of ubisoft open world fatigue.
I don't have money to buy it give me this😢
How is this third person? Its first person 😊
Wait…so there’s no third person option actually in the game? Yup, not getting it.
this game has zero hype
Don't take your case for a generality
blame Cameron, avatar 2 was ass
@@geert574 being a biologist, it wasnt, and the money behind and profit pufff, can you really call that an ass?
Farcry Primal: Blue Dragon
Far too many errors in the graphics, you can see the clouds through the mountains. And when you fly, everything looks black down below. Expected more.
Horizon Pandora
This is why I don't like Ubisoft. Every game they make feels the same
This formula perfectly suits avatar tho
Then don't play it. It's cool to dog on Ubisoft these days but while yall are complaining and whining about every lil thing I'm having fun
Bingo.
@@johnmcfall5723Well that is you. He has a right to his opinion.
This probably gonna be the game of the year
lol when Baldur’s Gate 3 exists?? No chance
@@cannibalbunnyfck baldurs gay
I hope Spiderman 2 wins
@@Salute503 that would be a tough one but it’s not beautiful at night like that scene in the first Avatar movie
Spiderman 2 sure 🔥
i cant believe the sound is shit like in valhalla. they compress it so much. i feel like im hearing .wav after being recorded by a phones mic. such a pitty they dont care ...
is the game music copyright on yt?
sur pc a la manette :O
The game doesnt seem spectacular at all. Animations/graphics & the overall feel doesn't look too promising. I'll reserve my judgement until the reviews are out.
where the 3rd person at
Why is this first person?
First person? Nah pass.
PS2 Ass graphics 😂😂😂😂😂😂
SERIES X: THE BEST WAY TO PLAY AVATAR!!!
An RTX 4080's MSRP is $1200!!! Which is what is recommended for 4K @60 on PC. That's just the GPU. Not to mention everything else needed for your rig. A case, RAM and on and on. OR...you can play Avatar in 4K @60 on SX for $500! And it even includes a 4K movie player!!!
Bottom line...PC gaming is for the rich and a waste of money!
The difference is that Xbox will have worse graphics than PC. You could probably play 4k60 on all low on a 30 series. Also, there's no need to play 4k unless you have a rather large screen, I'd say over 30 inches, and at that point you wouldn't be sitting right in front of it so lower settings won't be as noticeable. All in all, if you're not a casual gamer you should get a PC, if you are a casual gamer than you should get an Xbox. It's really as easy as that
RTX3070 adm Ryzen 9 3900 64GB ram here, and dont give a shit about k4, just relax and play they game
@@sisenaoyagi8027
//dont give a shit about k4//
That's 4K, not K4. I don't care either. My point was for those who DO care, they're spending too much when they can have amazing resolution and FPS for a fraction of the cost. In my book, that's called stupid!
@@Shovker27
YOU SAY,
''The difference is that Xbox will have worse graphics than PC.''
ME: Consoles have reached a point of such gorgeous visuals now, that whatever ''difference'' you think there is, is meaningless. And PC gamers are spending a fortune to obtain it. That's a sign of stupidity!
YOU SAY,
''You could probably play 4k60 on all low on a 30 series.''
ME: An RTX 4080 is hardly ''low end''! And that's the recommended requirement for Avatar. And the MSRP is $1200. Again, that's just for a GPU. Now you need all the other stuff for your rig. Thousands just to say, ''look at my 4K''! Can we say...STUPID?
YOU SAY,
''Also, there's no need to play 4k unless you have a rather large screen, I'd say over 30 inches''
ME: Strawman argument. My comment was not about what YOU personally feel is a need. It was aimed at PC gamers who WANT 4K. Pay attention when you read comments. What YOU want is irrelevant. BTW...my flat screen is 65''!
YOU SAY,
''and at that point you wouldn't be sitting right in front of it so lower settings won't be as noticeable.''
ME: So now you know where everyone in the entire world sits, in relation to their TV. How do you see inside billions of homes at once? BTW...I sit close to my 65''.
YOU SAY,
''All in all, if you're not a casual gamer you should get a PC, if you are a casual gamer than you should get an Xbox. It's really as easy as that''
ME: I am a hardcore gamer. And I got XSX because I get amazing visuals, smooth FPS and a 4K movie player all for $500. Spending thousands on a gaming rig is STUPID. It's really as simple as THAT!
no
Another flop by Ubisoft.
I never liked the movies enough to play a game version tbh, i always rooted for the humans. This looks just kinda....average.
Catastrophic, again and again
?
They is didn’t even bother to animate a fourth finger. Lol what an unfinished mess. OMFG they have blue skin to clearly some sort of graphical glitch 🤦
Horizon Zero Far Cry
Far cry remake.. 3rd view or nothing
Not gonna buy cuz it has no 3rd person view
I'm gonna buy, cuz it has first person. 👍
why does this look like a mobile game?
Ur joking right?
I'm just really not interested.