Don't worry - nobody in the colonies are actually remotely interested in getting rid of you for an even more decrepit, smaller military, smaller money rotting Empire. Frankly it's redundant Britain applied for the CPTPP anyway and we don't want freedom of movement. But you guys are free to realise the TPP as Obama wanted too.
From a volunteer fire station captain in Canada I'm lucky to have a brit, a aussie and a kiwi all in one station helping to protect our community. We all work well together and have the same ideals.
@@jacobf1416 as obviously (and I assume deliberately) idiotic as that is, I would take it over CANZUK (in the form of an actual CANZUK federation that is).
@@lorddashdonalddappington2653 China only has low cost manufacturing, which will leave the country eventually for lower labour costs. In 20-30 years India’s infer structure should be in a far better situation and will become an alternative market for agricultural products and mined goods. Definitely possible to reduce reliance on China and CANZUK will get us better trade deals with the US, India and EU.
@@jamoblair7245 that is one of the stupidist comments ive ever seen. Just because they speak english doesnt mean their culture is the same as others🤦♂️ Jeezo how stupid are yo?, are you saying every english speaking country must have the same culture because we speak the same language? USA speaks English but is culturally very different from the UK, many americans speak of the cultural shock when going to England. Actually in disbeleif at the stupidity and ignorance of that comment
@@BlackCanery87 Calm down buddy. I have lived in 4 countries, so not really ignorant on this matter. If your are getting culture shock in another English speaking country, you should try living in Indonesia. English speaking cultures aren't identical, but they are very close in comparison with others. AS someone who has lived half his life in both the US and Australia for a decade each as well as in Asia, you might be the ignorant one here, but I don't need to stoop to insults to protect my pride.
I was very happy to have free movement to EU and very sad to loose it. I would be very happy to gain fee movement to Canada, Australia and New Zealand though.
Not gonna happen... heh heh, I have free movement as I'm a dual national, but under Australia's points system many UK residents would only get a tourist visa.
@@s3ra9h1m Canada can handle it so long as they don't all go to Toronto and Vancouver. I don't know if you've heard but we're kind of a big country geographicaly with only like, 3 places that have a population to even count as cities by most countries standards.
@@s3ra9h1m Mass immigration coming your way? You sound American thinking you’re somehow the best. I rarely hear anyone in the U.K. talking about a dream move to Canada. A visit maybe but not to move.
I do too. Uncle Sam would love to have a larger loyal friend standing side by side as we all have for over a century. That additional cohesion can only be advantageous with the rise of the Dragon and the reemergence of the Bear.
There have been plenty of audio mishaps throughout their videos. I often notice that they’ll leave in a bad take and redo it but don’t cut it properly. I can’t tell if they don’t review their videos before posting or if they’re just in a rush and make simple mistakes. Still, they’re great videos at the end of the day.
@@richard1493… and all the times numbers on the screen don't match numbers being spoken. Somebody not involved with the editing, who understands numbers and has a stereo pair of headphones, really needs to check the final cut before uploading each time. The content is good, but these problems make it all come across as amateur, and they work too hard for that to be fair.
Who is the new Darth Vader ? Boris Johnson ? Hahahahahaaaa ! :) The British Empire was already too weak to survive II WW and now, whatever is left of it, is plummeting.
Worth noting: Aus + NZ already have most of these trade deals in place via various treaties. We have freedom of movement with a few exceptions (Aus can reject us if we have a criminal record). A lawyer qualified in NZ can practice in Aus. Various others.
@@indogoUI we do, if it's even. The GDP for each country is roughly the same. With the EU, British wages were driven down because the GDP for Poland and other Eastern European nations was poorer , hence why 4 million EU nationals moved to the u.k.
@@Croz89 I did chuckle when I went past the Federal Building in Honolulu and saw it flapping in the breeze. An amalgamation of the American layout of stripes, with the 'ole Red, White, and Blue. . . . . . I've seen worse.
If you end up including the USA in the deal than this would be the greatest power to ever be considering the countries would own about 30-40% of earth and have the greatest economy to ever exist. The trade and the global coverage would be astounding but people are also forgetting democracies need to stick together this includes Hong Kong Taiwan and Myanmar we need them also in these deals especially since they also have trade routes within the Pacific Ocean this would be a war of democracy verses dictatorship which will prevail?
I’m a little confused as to why “not being the main trading partners” factors into the equation at all. It is not as if by making it easier to trade within CANZUK would make it harder to trade with anyone else...
Trade deals are complex and involve concessions and giving countries preferential access. Is it worth it for insignificant trading partners? The time and energy/concessions would be much more worthwhile spent with countries for which significant trade flow is a reality.
@@jasonwarner8219 yes, they are only insignificant at the moment due to decades of trade barriers caused by Britain’s EU membership. Prior to entry into the EEC most of Britain’s trade was with commonwealth nations. Now the UK is out of the EU it can return to such level.
Fully agree. The point here is that there is significant scope here for all four countries to increase there trading opportunities as well as new surrounding markets. Seems lost on TLDR. And then race card was pulled out at the end...which really killed this and highlighted the items bias.
Australia doesn't want freedom of movement. We already rejected it - it would negatively impact us as will Britain bullying us to fuck us over agriculture which is why we have nothing close to a deal yet. We already have Free Trade Agreements with CA and NZ. We've been trading with Britain the entire time already even when they were in the EU. We're quite capable of negotiating a separate trade deal, plus Britain recently applied to join the CPTPP trade bloc too (the thing AU, NZ and CA are already in) and what actually goes through the mind of someone that thinks directly challenging and excluding the US is a good idea here? You know, the US - far more important to us economically and militarily than Britain could ever be, as they've stuck by us for 70 years under ANZUS, even under Trump, they're deeply entrenched in the Asia Pacific with their military bases and they're the largest military on earth and you want to tell them to fuck off and deliberately exclude them for a racist... oh I'm sorry what else do I mean. Ummmm...white people only Commonwealth club nope, that sounds pretty racist too. Umm... what else - as a counter to China? On no wait that already exists with the US and the CPTPP and negotiating individual FTAs with the UK without handing over sovereignty or directly damaging Australian and regional interests. Soooo racist delusional white people thing it is then I guess.
@@taranullius9221 "White club" why cause we excluded nations with crippling amounts of poverty that would lead to mass immigration into 🇦🇺🇳🇿🇬🇧🇨🇦 and excluded a couple dictatorships like Singapore and Burma In FOM? Get real. What does the U.S have to do with this? Trade isn't a pick and choose, you can have it both ways. As you already said the UK is joining the TPP meaning CANZUK will already be 50% done now it's just down to FOM. "Directly challenging and excluding the U.S" we all know that A. America would not sign up to something with FOM. B. That Canada would be flooded by American immigrants driveing up housing prices whenever the party someone doesn't like wins. A good example would be the Canadian immigration sight crashing due to over use after Trump won in 2016. C. If they joined under the Democrats now in a few years the Republicans would just pull them out only for a few years later to re join under the democratics over and over. No thanks The reason people want 🇦🇺🇳🇿🇬🇧🇨🇦 to have closer military relations is because we ALL depend on the U.S way to much. Australia is just another Pawn on the American chess bored nothing more nothing less. Such a good feeling. But if you dislike CANZUK I respect you're opinion
@@taranullius9221 Don’t forget that each CANZUK nation are all multicultural societies. Canada for example has majority french speaking people in Quebec and The UK is home to large ethnic communities such as Black, Asian, Mixed Race etc. Islam is also the second biggest religious group in the UK
@@leming400 The Lion was actually inherited from the old Scottish flag. When Scotland formed the UK, it was inherited by England many years later. Something to do with being a symbol of both Christianity and kingship.
As a Canadian, I am deeply ashamed of our national animal, sure it's hardworking and smart, but we could have literally taken a polar bear. That's a literal killing machine, an apex predator.
@@Jay-jq6bl We already use both imperial and metric in the UK as a matter of course. Just some of the measures are different between the US and UK like Gallon.
@@Jay-jq6bl The US is too big to part of the union, but the union and US should work very closely. As for metric and imperial, people should be allowed to use whatever units are common in the market, switching benefits nobody.
We were never 'under the thumb' of the EU. We were its second biggest economy and one of its three most influential member states. But we are where we are and CANZUK is a real opportunity.
@Carl Stone The British car industry was in decline from the 1960s, Thatcher had faults but this certainly wasnt on her. As previously stated, poor management and poor union leadership and constant strikr action were key. Anything else is just revisionist history. Some poor decisions from British Leyland didnt help, too many mergers, producing cars which main competition were also from BL, not expanding their export market (although this option was harmed by the poor build quality and reputation damage during the 1970s).
@@waltertaylor44 strike action was only ever considered because workers and unions saw the direction industry was taking with shoddy management as you say, offshoring, privatisation, failures to properly invest and failure to prevent declining labour relations with industrial workforces.
@Leigh Garfield I don't know exactly but I think as a foreigner the UK has to much bankers and lawyers and not enough technicians and ingenieurs. True or wrong ?
The main benefit in CANZUK is in acting as a economic and security block in an increasingly volatile word. CANZUK would have a population of 140 million, a GDP of 6.3 trillion USD and 18 million km² of land - certainly a force to be reckoned with.
@@mattia8327 You are correct, CANZUK would still be smaller than the USA, China & the EU but CANZUK would be 4th in economic weight after those 3, at about 1/3 the size of the US or China and 1/2 the EU, I'd hardly call CANZUK irrelevant or a rounding error. Don't forget CANZUK has also excellent economic and military relations with both the USA & the EU, not to mention several of the next most important countries in the world including Japan, India, South Korea, Brazil and Mexico.
@@rebbiakiva A more significant factor would be that they are well geographically positioned to facilitate worldwide international trade to and from the three larger powers. The US has become less and less willing to continue to expend money and resources on mainraining their large navy, which has helped to maintained a secure shipping nerwork for international trade for decades. Theoretically, CANZUK could take on that responsibility. Even further to this, they could even provide regional collection and distribution hubs based in their respective nations of those Regions. Essentially this would also allow a means of facilitating mutually equitable trade between nations that would otherwise not be able to do so.
We should go for it. No other countries have so much in common historically and culturally as Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. We would have so much to gain if we renewed our links. Separate, autonomous democracies with shared values.
@@seancarmody7873 the issue with India is free movement. CANZUK’s population would be 137 million. India has a population of 1.3 billion. And with India’s gdp per capita being $2,000 and CANZUK’s gdp per capita being 47,000. There would be crazy amounts of immigration. Jamaica also has the same problem but to a much lesser extent, because there population is much smaller than India’s. And Ireland is already in the EU. Which means we’d all have to follow the same regulations as the EU for it to work (we don’t want to do that) I would be fine with the Caribbean islands joining tho, but I don’t think they would be happy about it. Most skilled workers would just leave and they’d suffer with brain drain and there native population being displaced, maybe even making them the minority in there own country. There’s just no other country within the commonwealth apart from these 4 that we could start a close union with.
@@joshbentley2307 We explicitly ruled out freedom of movement already. We already trade with Britain, we're negotiating a trade deal just with them on our own and that's all we need to do because we already have FTAs with CA and NZ and Britain have also applied to join the CPTPP trade bloc with us, CA and NZ. Even our conservatives aren't as stupid as to resurrect deliberately insulting, exclusionary white supremacy in the faces of our most important economic, regional, security and trade partners - none of whom are Britain. Tony Abbott with his Imperial arsekissing, the couple of rags you'll find on Google saying as such and the CANZUK propaganda people - who lie to you openly - are not going to change geopolitical reality. They say Scot Morrison has expressed support for CANZUK on their Wiki page - but he hasn't. The citation doesn't mention CANZUK at all. Ditto Ardern who apparently "supported" CANZUK but when you check the citation it doesn't.
@Bigbradwolf And what makes you say that? I'm business person and I think it's plain silly. I mean what would we actually get out of it? _Maybe_ a customer for wool. But we'd get plenty of negatives, such as more of these 2-pound mediocre or limited poms with rubbish entitled attitudes who come here thinking that their own sweat smells better and their insolent behaviour in the workplace and tendency to try and play little games.
@Bigbradwolf P.S. I don't know what planet of clueless you come from, but there was nothing"crazy" about the UK joining the EEC. It was and still is a far more massive market and one which the UK fitted into nicely. It's no coincidence that the UK was stagnating economically between 1945-75, especially compared to mainland European nations like Germany, the Netherlands, France, Italy, whose economies were booming. Yet a few years after 1973, the UK's economy was booming. That's why the UK had been wanting to join since the late 1950s.
@@garrenwright256 The brits may beg you to start an alliance and after you finally agreed they will complain about everything, leave you all behind and pretend it was all your fault in the first place. Pro-tip : if they ever entertain the idea of taxing tea, just call us and we'll be on our way.
Canadian here. The whole CANZUK project is the brainchild of some far right think-tanks and is supported by the major right-wing party in each nation. While the vague notion of closer ties is broadly popular in all 4 countries (we've got a lot of history together), none of the three former colonies has any interest whatsoever in giving up their sovereignty (and the British right seems awfully fond of reminiscing about the Empire... the rest of us don't). Because it's exclusively a fairly far right plan, it will end up becoming a political issue opposed by other political parties (and in Canada, the Tories are NOT the default governing party... 60% of Canadians hate them and 70% won't vote for them unless they're angry at the centrist Liberal party). Basically, the centre and left in these various countries will rip the teeth out of any CANZUK proposal that goes too far. It will get painted as a racist, historically regressive project if pushed too far. As an alliance and possibly as a free movement zone, it might be viable. As a free trade zone, it's pretty redundant. The three non-UK countries already have a free trade deal via the CPTPP and the UK is looking into joining that trade deal. Basically the UK's mostly a cultural and military partner for the other Commonwealth realms in this idea. We're allies. The real appeal of it is creating a second tier large block of roughly equal partners (the rest can counterbalance the UK) rather than being stuck in American orbit (when the US isn't terribly stable). And if you are wondering about Quebec, l'idée d'une alliance plus proche est populaire même chez nous (environs 65% en faveur au Québec) mais bien sûr seulement si on contrôle les affairs culturelles et linguistiques chez nous. On aime bien les australiens, néo-zélandais et même les britanniques (malgrés nos pépins envers leurs ancêtres et l'empire, on n'a rien contre les britanniques d'aujourd'hui et on a plus en commun culturellement que l'on admet). On est habitué d'être entouré d'une mer anglophone et comme les autres canadiens, on cherche quelque chose pour balancer dans une autre direction que les américains. All that said, it is a completely impractical free trade zone (and would overlap existing free trade). None of the three other nations would buy into British Empire part 2 and each would insist on equal status. If the UK can't even manage to keep Scotland and Wales happy in a union together, it's folly to assume they could keep three nations whose national identity is rooted in having broken off from the UK in any strong union. As a military alliance alongside NATO, yeah, lots of potential there. Free movement... iffy... very different immigration rules in these four countries.
Not if it would cause barriers to be erected with a much more significant partner. We don't live in the 18th century, no matter what the "buccaneering britain" propaganda says. Trade these days is formalised around several large blocs (the EU, ASEAN, MERCOSUR, USMCA/NAFTA, GCC, CIS etc.) who negotiate between them. Self-exclusion from these blocs for anyone other than a full-bore economic superpower like China is a bad position to be in.
@@lmlmd2714 Are these trading blocks a political union or just trade? Nothing wrong with trade, but political union seems like a train ride to becoming a province of the block.
3 ปีที่แล้ว
Canada would somalia if not for the american economy
@@francissaunders4050 , Quebec is by far the largest Francophone region other than France. Quebecois French is different from French French just like Austrian or Swiss German is different from German German. Interestingly, Quebecois French is in some ways more pure. I once had a Parisian scornfully tell me that the Quebecois used "le stationnement" for "parking lot" instead of the correct "le parking".
@@stuartschaffner9744 I was on holiday in Greece and met a guy from Quebec and some French guys told him his French was an abomination and told him to speak English lol
@@Sarcasm_Corporation The Royal Navy dissuaded Nova Scotia, Quebec decided to stick the with British due to the disdain protestants in the 13 colonies showed towards Catholics.
You already have FTAs with Australia and New Zealand and actually you've signed a deal with Britain recently though that was mainly extending existing conditions pending more negotiations and anyway Britain applied to join the CPTPP now the thing that we're already all in. None of us need this imperialist bullshit.
@@taranullius9221 What do you have against it? Labor mobility is far from a reality between us. Allowing labor to move to where it's most productive will benefit us all.
Why not both ? Start to destination a trip to France is going to be way more than 40km , im in South East England and the eurostar is still more than 40km away and container ships hauling thousands times more than one lorry isn't that much more costly just time consuming
Its not an either or, trade with the EU will continue regardless and free trade deals will continue to be signed with other nations around the world at break neck speed. An alliance among Canzuk nations would go beyond trade while respecting the rights of individual nations to create there own laws
I like that, I would love to go to NZ and Australia when this problem that the world has. I would also love to support Australia more as their is only so much we can do for them in the current trading issues Australia has with China.
@@Wipeout2806 works fine between Australia and New Zealand. Since CANZUK is just opening Trans-Tasman agreement up to another two nations what specific problems do you actually envisage?
The uk went for brexit in a lot of ways to block people coming into the country. It's ironic then that British people don't think Canada, Australia or New Zealand don't want random wasters from the uk. Of course you can live in work in these countries anyways today if you have an in demand job. But I just wanted to highlight the hypocrisy that UK people have. It's absolutely unreal. And of course there were other reasons for leaving but that was a massive one, even if you personally weren't a part of it.
Just heads up, they have French speakers there(if you don't like French). Anyway, Canada sounds like a good country to go to. Even Australia and New Zealand.
it is also worth noting that the deal of 'CANZUK' already exists, the trans tasman deal is what canzuk is after, it was the deal to be extended to UK and canada.
Why? Australia and NZ are neighbours, fought for Britain in two world wars.and both are secure multicultural migrant nations.Why would they want to go back to days of Empire? Besides the UK already has trade and FOM with its neighbour, Eire
@@ausbrum its nothing to do with the empire, does it not say anything to you when the ONLY people who mention the empire are those against it? because they dont understand it, its the 4 most similar nations on earth creating a trade union for the mutual benefit of all 4 nations, for it to be 'the empire' britain would have to be in charge, britain is not in charge at all, no one would be.
@a basketboy Similar cultures? It is the Australia Day week end, native ownership is being discussed. You know SFA about Australian culture and thinking, and as for "education" Australia has yet to produce anything as dumb as Boris Johnson or Brexit or an elite university like Oxford taking a donation from a tax exile.I find it offensive that you imagine Australians and Kiwis think just like Brits.And for skilled migration , it already exists. It isn't just open to Anglos
@@v_cpt-phasma_v689 Try understanding what is being discussed and celebrated this Australia Day week end and then tell me that Australia is "similar". It thinks differently. It acts differently. And "similarity" isn't just defined by language.
Backin the 70s, in Australia, the farmers formed cooperatives, the entered the Government market and stored produce to keep the prices stable. Later on, Australia lost wool sale contracts to Canada (?), because Canada (?) offered a fresh clip, over wool the clip that had been in storage for a few years. I can’t see how UK farmers can compete against Australia’s industrial scale farming. In the meat industry, even the US is pressed. Brit farmers might harvest scores of acreage; In Oz, it might thousands of acres, with large scale machine harvesting. Huge economies of scale in Australia’s favour. Though, New Zealand survives OK, with Agriculture but it is beholden to China, as China China has planned. Vassals via the Brick and Road Initiative. Australia’s economy is less exposed, because Agriculture represents 3% of GDP. But, farmers vote, and have their own regional party in coalition with fellow conservatives. In the Asia Pacific Century, the UK would be an odd fit. Although, Australia and the UK have just signed a FTA. Excluding China, and with the US rejoining, the Trans Pacific Partnership would represent 40% of World GDP. I do agree with the free movement of people, owing to a common language and heritage, except French Canadians might not agree. Tourism and transnational employment opportunities, great.
I'm all for agreements especially with CAN, NZ and AUS - to have free travel - work - labour standardization , greater military integration etc.- but no new flags - and we know all this discussion is a "long live the empire" nostalgic grouping. Canada is a bilingual country and none of the other 3 are. I also do not see Canada making any changes to the current FTA agreement with the US.
@@d0ubled1amond New Zealand is also pushing to reintegrate its bilingual past with its native language. Officially, English isn't even an official language in New Zealand. Where as NZ Maori and NZ Sign Language are legally official languages.
I said this at the time, and I'll keep saying it until it stops being true. Brexiteers only ever seem to talk about the UK as if it were in the middle of the Pacific, and not (as is the case) literally swimming distance from France
Well considering we live on an island nation that has warred with its ‘neighbours’ for nearly forever is that really unexpected? Britain‘s closest allies have never been in Europe aside from maybe Portugal and Poland who we have long standing ties with well prior to the EU.
And Remainers seem to act like it's literally impossible to trade goods with other countries unless you're in the same bloc. How does free movement with Canada have anything to do with buying stuff from Europe?
Canadian here. Definitely a fan of CANZUK and have always wanted to travel/potentially live in these countries because of our shared but distinct cultures and outlooks. Obviously, it would be best to turn into this slowly by trying to amp up trade first especially. With China on the rise, it only seems advantageous to keep our allies close and although we Canadians have felt some of the heat from them, I know Australia and New Zealand has it even worse. Although the distance is larger than normal, I believe that Canada can implement a new trade system to help mind the gap between Australia, New Zealand and the UK, as to help make trade more viable. Definitely would like to see where this goes. I also miss the Jack. I still wave both flags.
I think I want to know how many fully qualified Kiwi, Aussie and Canadian doctors and nurses are remotely interested in finding employment with an NHS versus how many fully qualified Brittish doctors and nurses might be interested in seeing how much further their money can go in Canada, New Zealand or Australia. My cynicism suggests this is not a solution for the expertise shortage caused by the loss of freedom of movement.
I’m a Canadian who moved to the UK and working in the NHS. The major reason I moved here is to travel around Europe. The pay is significantly lower here in the UK though so other than travel opportunities I don’t see the UKs health system being particularly attractive to work in for Canadians, Australians or kiwis.
I would love for there to be free movement between CANZUK countries, it seems like it is really popular too. It makes so much sense because even though the countries are far apart they are all very similar.
it's a fantasy & will never happen. Even in globalised world, trade is geographical. For UK's economy not to collapse it will have to rejoin the single market & customs union so it can trade with the rest of EEA/EU nations. Once it does this, UK wouldn't be able to create its own new trade deal. So unless the entire EU also agree to freedom of movement with CANZUK but that looks unlikely. But would be cool nonetheless
@@kw2142 really? Why is it that most of what comes into this country comes from south east Asia then? Australia’s main trading partner for years was the pre-common market UK. And now there are hundreds of container ships trudging the sea lanes of the world. Why can’t the CANZUK nations trade together more?
@@nigethesassenach3614 ofc commonwealth countries could trade more, every1 could potentially trade more. i'm all for removing trade barriers (as long as it's ok for the environment). But the idea that Uk trade with the commonwealth could replicate EU trade is for the birds. Even at the height of the British empire, Britain did most of its trade with Europe. It's simple geography. A fact brexiteers can't get their heads around for some reason. Just look at a map FFS
@@kw2142 no one said anything about replacement ffs, just that it’s now possible as the EU was restricting the possibility. What, you think the UK doesn’t trade with the EU anymore? They literally have free tariff trade. Most of their disputes are over fish. Prior to the EU (including EEC) they were quite literally eachothers biggest trading partners excluding the USA, which Britain has maintained as the largest trading partner since 1785 😂
I mean it happened so quickly you'd be forgiven for getting that mistake. Who's the Nats leader? Simon Bri- oh wait no it's Todd Mul- no scrap that it's Judith Collins... oh she's just lost an election the worst ever defeat for National in an election in New Zealand... damn
I'm not surprised to hear about some people complaining and seeing this as a racist angle, not everything the first world does has to include the 3rd or 2rd world countries. In fact they can form their own union if that's what they wish, they can do it if they out their minds to it.
I’m from South Africa, and even I noticed in the first 5 minutes of the video that it wasn’t about the “commonwealth”. I was born after apartheid, and learned a lot about it in school. The Tory government is just a British version of the old national government from 70 & 80’s South Africa.
As a ex SouthAfrican now liveing in NZ. I can absolutely see why NZ would be included and SA not. The culture is drastically diffrant the views of life goals and loyalties are diffrant. It is not a race thing its a cultural one. NZ and britain is unlikely to ever seriously dissagree on any major international topic's. SA and britain would likely not last long before they disagree on something and end up diminishing the value of the entire block. This deal would likely be less economical in nature and more of an alliance with common goals and combined negotiation and military power aswell as one of conviniance. Its less of a deal born out of big gains and more a deal that makes sense due to haveing essentially no downsides.
SA wouldn’t want to be involved anyway. But provided they get their national development stats to a level similar of other CANZUK nations then I have no problem with them joining in the medium to distant future.
To draw comparisons between the UK government and apartheid in South Africa is ridiculous. The UK is one of the most multicultural countries in the world, but we are a very small country, and mass immigration has put immense pressure on our old towns and cities that were not built for such large numbers of people. People who voted to leave the EU aren't against immigration, we're against the quantity. There are financial inequalities that need to be addressed, but there is no apartheid here.
@@brandon3872 I would disagree with the UK being multicultural. It's pretty white if you ask me. Out of the four countries, Canada is by far is the most multicultural country. Also, Canadians seem to be less racist than the Brits.
My view, as an Australian, is towards further building the TPP, again with the US. The future is in the Asia Pacific. The TPP could negotiate collectively with the EU. The UK is not required.
@@CortezHoratio yes because it means we can get better deals with the larger economies. The EU doesn’t have a trade deal with the US, India or China. CANZUK would get one with all three.
@@joshbentley2307 That is definitely not certain. Canzuk would probably make a deal with the US more difficult then seperately. For one, Canada and Australia already have FTA's with the US and NZ was going to be part of the now failed TPP agreement. It would be weird that Canada and Australia would give up their US FTA's for Canzuk. The reason the EU doesn't have FTA's with China, India and the US is exactly size, both sides have a good position regardless and will therefor not accept anything that is not good enough. Getting Canzuk together would make FTA's more difficult too, not only because they are larger and can (try to) demand more, but also the Canzuk nations don't all have the same priorities, thus they themselfs will have to find a good balance.
A trade deal doesn’t have to be an all encompassing FTA, it could mean lowering just a few tariffs, even in one small sector or apply to a handful of goods. Anything that increases trade would be good but it’s never going to replace trade with your neighbours, why should it, it should be about increasing over all trade.
@@joshbentley2307 like how? you do realize each trade deal you sign you have to agree to align your own regulations to whatever is requested by those with who you sign those deals with. WTF makes you this it would ever be possible to sign a deal with USA and China at the same time? their requests would be utterly incompatible. Or China and India at the same time - there is a fierce rivalry between them and both would demand Uk pick a side
@Henry Bushell I can go to a cinema right now and sit next to a complete stranger without a mask. Employment is up and we are in deep talks with Japan, Vietnam, South Korea and Taiwan on increasing trade. If we were completely dominated by China we wouldn't be able to wage a trade war against them.
As long as it works for the UK and all countries involved, then why not, our goals and objectives and values are very similar almost the same, plus it's reinforces our committment to our cultural allies, creating a large network militarily to partner with the United States and within my NATO.
I see i as an Australian have always liked the idea, though it doesn't make much sense. As a citizen, I can already travel to NZ freely post Covid, I have no reason to what to go to Canada or Britain minus for tourism but then again I can just go to Sydney. Militarily and politically Australia has served side by side with these countries in every major conflict because of NATO, Commonwealth, and good political friends. And lastly, economically there isn't much to gain, from a personal standpoint I don't see British and or Canadians wanting and or relying on Aussie exports as they have alternative and cheaper options. Now with massive caviar, this is my opinion I wish no harm by stating what I believe to be true let's have a civil discussion. thank you
Thanks for sharing your comments make a note to my trusted trader , Johnson on wats ap to help you make profit in bitcoin + 1 2 0 .9 3 1 9 2 1 3 1 he's strategies are top notch 🇫🇯
@@natmcc7748 yeah this is a very good point I agree, one problem though bearing this thought process in mind I don't think that such a move would please our political overlords, also if it doesn't have huge payouts then I doubt that any of our governments would go for it.
Well first I would say that more free trade is never a bad thing, so even if it does not help, theoretically it can't hurt (unless it becomes an EU 2.0). Second, each of the nations in CANZUK are moving more towards a internet/intellectual economy. Physical trade just becomes less important as time moves on, making the whole "to far to trade" thing kind of moot. Third, I would expect all trade to increase with CANZUK as political and trade barriers get broken down, the USA and Japan manage to trade just fine with the whole world, so I don't think its as big of a problem as people think it is.
I’m Canadian an absolute love this idea! Never met a Canadian who didn’t. It would be very hard tho let’s not sugar coat it but I think it would put CANZUK in a real position to bargain, as well as grow our collective internal market!
I’m against it. I’m indigenous. This is just more colonization. The indigenous populations of each countries don’t even want it. It is just British bootlickers.
@louis george well seeing that Canada is doing colonization. It is but with extra steps. No one asked the Maoris or the Australian aboriginals. All I see is white Anglos wanting that. If you want to apart of the British go fucking live with them.
@@melvinfarrell4684 It only 'worked' for Britain when it dictated trade terms, once the others become 'independent' the UK had FA trade with them, hence why the Brits joined the EU. Read stuff don't just make it up
why? already the uk has started getting fruit from Colombia 🇨🇴 and waiting to finalise an agreement with Ghana 🇬🇭. i just bought some bananas with a Colombian sticker. on for a good price.
From Australia's perspective, it would make sense for us to urgently liberalise and expand trade with as many countries as possible, particularly those in south and east Asia. We're in a very uncomfortable position where our largest trading partner (by far) is waging a trade war against us. I have nothing against CANZUK, but it will in no way compensate for lost trade with China and to think otherwise is delusion.
On the Canadian side we are not even aware of this project. xD For us, Brexit or not does not change much. The UK will try to enter into partnerships with as many countries they can to avoid suffering too much from immediate consequences of their mistake with the EU. For the Canada, this will not change anything: our main partner and from very, very far is the United States (and under the Biden administration we can expect a growing relationship between us). Even Mexico is more important as a partner than the UK. For the two others countries they have to deal with the great distance. The better for them would have been to trade with EU, ironically. Perhaps, with luck, Brasil and USA will try to find a way to help the tea drinkers. x)
We already have free trade agreements with Canada, New Zealand and the US. The only one missing is the UK and we can negotiate that separately without destroying our own interests chasing some racist Imperialist delusion.
@@taranullius9221 I think this is more about free movement. Europe...is full of Europeans. CANZUK countries have much greater non-european ethnic diversity than the EU countries.(except maybe France... it's pretty diverse)
like how america being uk's no.1 trade partner is ignored when it comes to economic proximity. The EU custom union is responsible for diminished trade with UK - which prior was Aus biggest trade partner
@@Jay-jq6bl They haven't left yet because we haven't done anything stupid like this before. CANZUK would likely swamp Canada with way too many monolingual Anglo's which would put Quebec and their national interests in a lot of pressure, destabilizing the union.
"Does not include India, Pakistan, South Africa or the Carribeans" I have a feeling that this list probably isn't the most interested in a further union that involves Britain. Frankly its a miracle they are all part of the commonwealth
Canada still has the jack and uses it all the time, it just have two flags. The maple is the main one but if you look at military uniform the jack is used all the time still.
No No NO ..why do you want to go down a road you just got out of? ...get this straight while we like some form of this deal realize 1 thing....we will NEVER NEVER let any other country make law's for the Canadian people even if they try to sugar coat it and sneak it in under the mask of being proposed by our government..we have only 1 flag and it's the Maple Leaf. you can do what you want ,but im telling you if you start with the NWO and were all the same bullshit this deal is already dead...this is an economical deal, and sure if politically we find common ground so be it, but we will never let this CANZUK group decide the political or Legal direction Canada will take nor are we interested in sticking our nose's into the an other nation's political business
@@tiborcsizmadi4796 totally agree and i am from the UK trade political and culturally and militarily we should unite but no one parliament should govern all.
I haven't seen a people more pessimist about their own country's Future than the British, Like Damn dawg with that attitude you won't get anything in the first place...
That's what happens when your economy is in decline and your people are beaten down by 10 years of austerity only to come out of it right before the next recession and covid meaning we will be jumping right the fuck back into austerity soon
@@Tobberz lol I love it when people make totally baseless statements online. "... most normal people like ideas like this ..." how are you quantifying "normal" and how do you personally know what the opinions of the majority of these people are? 🤔
If you look at this map, Canada makes the perfect capital to be at the centre of this union (Australia & NZ to the west of Canada, the UK to the east of it).
@@gng11 especially with the north passage opening up with climate change, it will make Canada a world trading hub. Plus we are one of the rare places in the world where climate change is making habitability gaining ground instead of losing it. With its vast freshwater reserves, unexploited natural resources, and immense landmass we are in a prime position to receive a lot of population from the climate exodus. Plus most countries kinda tolerate or like us so we are in a good spot in therm of diplomatic power. Our only real weaknesses are our relatively low and aging population and still low automation in industries.
Agreed, and I'd up the ante from logistical challenge to logistical nightmare/fairytale. Canada and Australia are exporters of raw resources, minerals and oil/gas, with much, much closer and established markets for these goods that are very expensive to transport long distances. Canada -> US, Australia -> Pacific Rim countries, and the UK isn't a high-precision manufacturing country like the US, Germany or Japan anyways, so why would they even buy massive amounts of raw resources anyways even if Australia, Canada, and New Zealand were all in the North Sea?? A total marketing gimmick based on nostalgia for when all our countries were more culturally interlinked.
Kiwi here who lives in UK. I really support this, it's a great idea. I would love to visit Canada and always enjoy working with colleagues from Canada and Australia.
Thanks for sharing your comments make a note to my trusted trader , Johnson on wats ap to help you make profit in bitcoin + 1 2 0 9. 3 1 9 2 1 3 1 he's strategies are top notch 🇫🇯
As a Canadian born and raised in Canada I love the CANZUK idea and can’t wait for it to be implemented. Where ever I travel in the world we always end up making friends with Aussies, Kiwis and Brits. I only need to go to my second cousins and I have family in all four of these countries. While the EU was 27 strangers making up its membership the CANZUK countries are four close family members. To me the reason it’s just the “Fab Four” (for now) is that we don’t want to risk the alliance with adding in too many countries that are vastly different economically. I hold all my fellow Commonwealth citizens in warm regard but free movement with all those nations would pose the same kinds of challenges that the UK had when the EU expanded in 2001. I know my country’s safety net was already terrible before COVID, opening the door to unchecked migration would stress the system and fray the alliance. I’m not saying that that is a positive thing but we only need to look to history to know how it would work. You have to start somewhere, and I would be totally in favour of adding in other countries of the Commonwealth to the club as the circumstances allowed for a smooth entry. For example prior to free movement stronger and closer economic ties could be possible and might accelerate a nation’s progress to being able to join the club entirely. But what I think will be crucial to the success of CANZUK where the EU faltered is we must always make changes that are best for all countries and not let the grand ambitions of political leaders overrule what is best for all like the EU has done.
I grew up in UK, we would eat New Zealand Lamb and Australian Beef. The advantage Australia and New Zealand have is they both can feed out their animals all year round, that means they can kill, butcher and ship to the other side of the world and still land it cheaper. European countries had to feed their animals on hay and keep them in barns for 2 months a year. When UK Joined the EU the cost of living went up considerably. There was a lot of complaining among the UK population.
Also the fact that there is nothing wrong or racist about being white, you never hear anything about Africa needing to be more diverse from the usual crowd, do you?
There are few positives to Brexit regarding trade with Canada. The EU (including the UK) already had a trade agreement with Canada for a huge amount of goods and services (CETA). The UK had a better trading position within a Trade Bloc with 500m population vs 35m population. This is simple negotiations. Now it is 70m vs 35m. And wqwe have much less to offer now the UK is outside of trade lines. THERE IS NO LOVE FOR "EMPIRE" OUTSIDE OF RIGHT-WING CIRCLES.
How is this nationalistic attempt to revive the British Empire doing any good? UK fostering ties with all the white English speaking people around the world... It smells of racism. Let's work with these people, they are just like us.... what is not being said is white people just like us.
@@melanieenmats If CANZUK would be racist, so is be the EU. To some people, it's a continuation of some Germans' dreams about "Einheit Europas" from the early 40s. Why is the EU regional? Why there are no plans to create an EU-African free trade area? Why didn't they admit Turkey while they still could? If I interpret this clearly, the goal CANZUK is not the substitute for the EU federal state, but some kind of close political alliance, clearly aimed at increasing the member's broader security against aggressive global powers like China and integrating such actions more closely with the US. As for "openness" to the World, UK will have the CPTPP, which by its nature is just unable be "racist" (another obviously overused term). I'm jealous of the UK, in my country (PL) my vote won't ever mean so much.
Its a brilliant idea, as people of the same tongue and historic roots we are literally brothers and sisters and should be close like all good families are.
@@jimgraham6722 It sure helps having a big brother around when you're getting bullied. Better yet, merge to have the strength of the whole family in one body.
As a Brit who married an Aussie and now lives down under, lots of Aussies like a stint in the UK, London especially, but I have met almost none who didn't go home after a year or so. On the other hand Brits who come here mostly stay (and its easy to see why). This likely one way traffic is I think one reason why Australia is the least enthusiastic of the group about CANZUK.
Absolutely. As a Brit I don’t support CANZUK even though I really want to move to those other countries. They all have a much higher quality of life than the UK and free movement would mean Brits will move to those countries in droves and ruin them.
@@beardedbaldie2698 How would they ruin them? Each has different economies, so labor can stay where it's most productive. Canada and Australia have huge land area which is underutilized, so it's only natural that the flow of labor would be towards Canada and Australia. That's not a bad thing though. Especially for those who can't find work in the UK.
@@Jay-jq6bl The UK population is equal to that of Australia, Canada and NZ combined. That’s a lot of people who will be moving! Also, Canada and Australia might be big but most of the land is uninhabitable. That’s why all major metropolitan areas in Australia are on the coast and in Canada along the southern border. A dramatic increase in population will put pressure on public services and infrastructure. The UK is horrendously overpopulated and one of the main reasons why it’s become such a terrible place to live. I’d love to move to Canada or Australia but through the proper visa process. Why should they let me in if they have enough skilled citizens of their own to do a job?
Nobody outside the UK has ever heard of it... And they don't care. It's just an imaginary crutch the UK is attempting to lean on (spoiler: imaginary crutches don't provide much support)
That may be a little unreliable because it was the CANZUK group themselves that came up with the analytics, it could have been a bit biased. Although, saying that, I have no qualms with the idea at all. It's not like there's even a downside if trade between the nations isn't as prevalent as one would hope because there'd still be free movement and military aid. What I do think is the case is that, going forward, it will only become easier to sustain large-scale trade across the globe with the advancement of technology. Kind of a future-proofed union.
The CANZUK is a pipe dream. They are too spread out for trade really to become a big thing. New Zeeland and Australia already cooperate a lot. But their next closest CANZUK us Canada which is further away than the US which is a much better partner for both Canada and Auatralia + New Zeeland.
Do it! Even better, recreate the British Empire in a style similar to the EU. People will always say “but racism”, but I say that we ought to move past the horrors of the past in the interest of a better future. This CANZUK arrangement should be extended to all former British colonies and dominions. Even the US could be invited!
don't think you have to apologize to NZ for their economy. I don't think they really care about being an economic power. they're just happy down there being happy and wondering why everyone else hasn't figured it out yet.
Yea its not surprise a country of only 5 million people has the smallest nominal GDP out of the bunch, I guess they did add context with GDP per capita.
The Netherlands could be part of CANZUK based on the fact that most Dutch people speak a little English and the colors of the Dutch flag are the same as the other members and the N for NZ could double as the N for the Netherlands. Done deal I guess.
@@CrownRider No other EU country is stupid enough to give up its main customers and sources of supply, as well as its freedom of movement, just to have a nationalist feeling like Brexiteers. Modern EU citizens know that you can't eat nationalism. Nationalism is a relic from the past that nobody in the EU wants anymore because it has only caused disadvantages over the past centuries. The EU is not just a trading bloc, but a guarantor of freedom and peace among its members. Britain has now thrown this under the bus and is struggling to make new friends and trading partners, but unfortunately they are thousands of miles away.
Pros of CANZUK: 1) The CANZUK nations have a lot in common - culture, government, head of state, language, and even cuisine and humour. This makes integration easier than, say, between the UK and far-flung EU nations, who are culturally very different. 2) Trade is less certain for many CANZUK countries. Canada has recently been slapped with US tariffs, the UK left the EU, and Australia is facing Chinese hostility. CANZUK could help to stabilise these economies, especially since the goods traded between them are broadly compatible (e.g. Australia exports raw materials, and the UK imports materials to produce finished products). Given the state of affairs mentioned (with links weakening between existing trading partners), it's likely that a CANZUK trade agreement would noticeably increase trade within the group. 3) A CANZUK union with close strategic ties could be a significant military power - especially in terms of naval coverage - since CANZUK forces could be based and operate anywhere from Western Europe to the South Pacific. All five being part of the "Five Eyes" alliance helps with this. 4) Free movement between CANZUK nations is unlikely to put strain on any one country, since all nations are about as rich as each other. This decreases the likelihood of any one nation being "swarmed" by a large number of migrants. Cons of CANZUK: 1) The UK is probably not going to want to "rebound" into another union so soon after Brexit. 2) The UK has a bad taste in its mouth about unions in general after many Brits saw the EU has hoovering up sovereignty without proportional accountability to the electorate. A hypothetical CANZUK would have to balance national sovereignty with being an actual, legally-binding union. Too strict, and many will wish to leave. Too loose, and it's not really worth calling a "union". 3) Geography hinders the ability of a CANZUK union to make meaningful trade agreements with other nations. For instance, Canada would be very eager to get a good trade deal with the US, but that would mean that the other CANZUK nations might be bound into a US trade agreement which doesn't suit them. Long distances also means that trade within CANZUK would be slow. 4) Recent "problems with foreigners" (migrant crisis, terrorism, etc.) has made many in the UK pessimistic about "free movement", even with well-liked CANZUK nations. There's also the problem of any single CANZUK nation making free movement agreements with a 3rd party, which could result in them being a gateway for mass migration into the CANZUK system. I personally like the idea of CANZUK, but there are a lot of kinks to iron out first. (The argument about "CANZUK being racist" is a non-starter, and - frankly - insulting. The CANZUK nations are already more racially diverse than the EU, and yet the EU isn't accused of racism on that basis. The reason for excluding other nations is mostly due to huge differences in national wealth, which would unbalance any free movement arrangement. Given the chance, millions of Indians (for instance) would fly en masse to CANZUK nations, which would gut the labour pool in India and overburden CANZUK. This would cause serious problems for all nations involved. Cultural and language differences would also make integration more difficult, whereas - as mentioned - CANZUK countries are already extremely close. Besides, the UK has already accepted millions of immigrants from places such as India, and they're an accepted part of society. Rishi Sunak and Priti Patel are government officials - with Priti Patel being well-liked by Tory voters for her firm stance on illegal immigration. This doesn't sound like "racial discrimination" to me.)
I completely agree. But number 4 (cons) wouldn’t be as big of an issue as it is within the EU, because CANZUK would be building off of the TTTA agreement between Australia and New Zealand. In the TTTA agreement people with criminal records and security risks (suspected terrorists) wouldn’t be allowed to move between the countries.
Love how the UK has left the EU only to contemplate a new union, one that can outmuscle the UK's labor supply, farming and fishing economies in just 3 countries. Makes me wonder why we even left in the first place?
Where did you get the idea the UK is contemplating a union with these three other countries? There might be closer trade in the future, but no equivalent arrangements that the UK had with the EU.
It makes perfect sense considering that the UK has the financial resources and technological expertise to dominate these three countries; why worry about fishing, labor supply and farm produces when the UK can simply buy-out all the major industries in these three "Blood is thicker than water" countries.
I have watched a lot of CANZUK videos and they all seem to miss one very important bond between these countries. They still have the same head of state ie HM Queen Elizabeth II and their military technically still swear allegiance to this head of state. No other union are more closely linked than these countries.
@@mazeemadaline3091 if they say that tell em why they don't have an trade agreement with the African countries and 85 percent of the population of Europe are white compare to 75 percent of this CANZUK union
Very sad to see TLDR use racism and ethnicity as a reason to be against the CANZUK agreement. I don't see how bringing four nations with shared values and yes a language more closely together is a bad thing. Also adding little things in the video like "Just reheated British Imperialism" 10:35 and "We don't like that" 5:30 when talking about "shared interest outlook and values" is unnecessary and divisive.
If you were American this must be like finding out on Facebook all your best friends had a party and didn't invite you.
Because you left them early on, and now regret it
@Raymond Portalatin With all the things that have happened with COVID-19... I don’t know man, everything seems to be falling apart.
The United States will not allow this to happen. Canada is part of the United States economically and culturally and strategically
Don't worry - nobody in the colonies are actually remotely interested in getting rid of you for an even more decrepit, smaller military, smaller money rotting Empire. Frankly it's redundant Britain applied for the CPTPP anyway and we don't want freedom of movement. But you guys are free to realise the TPP as Obama wanted too.
And unlike Britain, America has actually never abandoned the Antipodes. Not even under Trump.
I don't care how far Canada is away, I need my tapped tree juice.
Coming up, try it on waffles too. 🇨🇦🇦🇺
would you like poutine with that?
*tree blood for the tree god*
Oh no problem, we gotcha bud.
I mean what else are we gonna put on our pancakes? Just lemon and sugar? I don't think so!!!
From a volunteer fire station captain in Canada I'm lucky to have a brit, a aussie and a kiwi all in one station helping to protect our community. We all work well together and have the same ideals.
That's so cool cuz, this needs to happen, we could do great things to better this world of ours.
Hey mate, should find a proposed CANZUK flag and hang it up in the station
My brother, Australian, moved to and is now permanently living in Canada.
Really?
I’ve tried to work with Poms plenty of times. I can’t work well with most of them, they are lazy and conniving and entitled.
@@danieleyre8913 Did you get that racism from leftist political views? Or perhaps you are of Irish decent where the racism is ingrained?
Please as a New Zealander i want to be able to stop our reliance on China, CANZUK is a possible way out of that reliance
No it isn't. The UK and Canada are simply irrelevant compared to China from an ANZ perspective.
@@jacobf1416 as obviously (and I assume deliberately) idiotic as that is, I would take it over CANZUK (in the form of an actual CANZUK federation that is).
why not trade with china though?
@@lorddashdonalddappington2653 China only has low cost manufacturing, which will leave the country eventually for lower labour costs.
In 20-30 years India’s infer structure should be in a far better situation and will become an alternative market for agricultural products and mined goods.
Definitely possible to reduce reliance on China and CANZUK will get us better trade deals with the US, India and EU.
YES, SAME AS AN AUSTRALIAN
As someone from the UK i love our NZ, OZ, CAN friends. Shared values.
I lived in 3 out of 4 and can honestly say australia was a culture shock.
@@BlackCanery87 If you get culture shock from an English speaking country you would struggle anywhere else.
@@jamoblair7245 that is one of the stupidist comments ive ever seen. Just because they speak english doesnt mean their culture is the same as others🤦♂️
Jeezo how stupid are yo?, are you saying every english speaking country must have the same culture because we speak the same language? USA speaks English but is culturally very different from the UK, many americans speak of the cultural shock when going to England.
Actually in disbeleif at the stupidity and ignorance of that comment
shared values? ask the first nations people in our countries. come and see the damage that's been done here :)
@@BlackCanery87 Calm down buddy. I have lived in 4 countries, so not really ignorant on this matter.
If your are getting culture shock in another English speaking country, you should try living in Indonesia. English speaking cultures aren't identical, but they are very close in comparison with others. AS someone who has lived half his life in both the US and Australia for a decade each as well as in Asia, you might be the ignorant one here, but I don't need to stoop to insults to protect my pride.
I was very happy to have free movement to EU and very sad to loose it. I would be very happy to gain fee movement to Canada, Australia and New Zealand though.
From Scotland To Nova Scotia
Not gonna happen... heh heh, I have free movement as I'm a dual national, but under Australia's points system many UK residents would only get a tourist visa.
@@nrgmn Well said, well put ... though you'll have the CANZUK / EU Quitter xenophobes swivelling their eyes and foaming at the mouth.
What a refreshing take on things. What’s done is done, look forward.
plus you still have free movement with Ireland
As a Canadian I am desperate for this to happen, we got big love for the rest of Y'all CANZUK's
@@s3ra9h1m Canada can handle it so long as they don't all go to Toronto and Vancouver. I don't know if you've heard but we're kind of a big country geographicaly with only like, 3 places that have a population to even count as cities by most countries standards.
@@s3ra9h1m Canada's underpopulated & there wouldn't be mass migration going one way
@Patrick Oopdara EU would be more racist
@Patrick Oopdara why?
@@s3ra9h1m Mass immigration coming your way? You sound American thinking you’re somehow the best. I rarely hear anyone in the U.K. talking about a dream move to Canada. A visit maybe but not to move.
I hope y’all Brits, Canadians, Australians, and New Zealanders can bring this alliance into existence best of luck from the Southland 🇺🇸
As a Canadian living in South Georgia, I believe that CANZUK can also benefit America.
I do too. Uncle Sam would love to have a larger loyal friend standing side by side as we all have for over a century. That additional cohesion can only be advantageous with the rise of the Dragon and the reemergence of the Bear.
Changing to just the left ear when talking about NZ trading partners was strange.
Yeah had to check i wasn't covering a phone speaker
Yeah, probs a small quality control issue. Also noticed a typo at 7:50. But still great content
It was likely re-recorded and spliced in. Somebody forgot to check levels before uploading.
There have been plenty of audio mishaps throughout their videos. I often notice that they’ll leave in a bad take and redo it but don’t cut it properly. I can’t tell if they don’t review their videos before posting or if they’re just in a rush and make simple mistakes. Still, they’re great videos at the end of the day.
@@richard1493… and all the times numbers on the screen don't match numbers being spoken. Somebody not involved with the editing, who understands numbers and has a stereo pair of headphones, really needs to check the final cut before uploading each time. The content is good, but these problems make it all come across as amateur, and they work too hard for that to be fair.
Clearly Wales has the best flag, its got a fricking DRAGON on it
I love Wales so much, I'm English but I used to visit my nan all the time.
@@Ja-uu9ep Welsh are great of course. I regard them a little like scousers. Almost English just with a funny accent.
@@maxpowerii7368 Welsh are there own people
@@Ja-uu9ep yes that’s the joke. I’m English as well.
The country named after a fish has a dragon on it's flag?
CANZUK; The Empire Strikes Back
From "Behind".
Who is the new Darth Vader ? Boris Johnson ? Hahahahahaaaa ! :) The British Empire was already too weak to survive II WW and now, whatever is left of it, is plummeting.
Oh no! As before the English will try to set the rules and let the others know their place.
@@patrickmccutcheon9361 according to this we are the most powerful
@@agamonjaroszek8496 who told you the secret plan?
If the Canadians dont start playing cricket, the deal's off
Hahaha
😂😂😂😂
@@bennyvreuls9229 Umm no it so obvious this is a fake TLDR account
I'll start playing cricket if you take up hockey bud 😉
@@eddieman19891 in Australia and New Zealand there is ice hockey comps 😂😂
Worth noting: Aus + NZ already have most of these trade deals in place via various treaties. We have freedom of movement with a few exceptions (Aus can reject us if we have a criminal record). A lawyer qualified in NZ can practice in Aus. Various others.
Australia and New Zealand share most standards, too; their standards organisations collaborate all the time.
Yes CANZUK is basically opening the Trans-Tasman agreement up to another two nations basically.
UK doesn't like freedom of movement
I thought you needed a criminal record to get in.
@@indogoUI we do, if it's even. The GDP for each country is roughly the same.
With the EU, British wages were driven down because the GDP for Poland and other Eastern European nations was poorer , hence why 4 million EU nationals moved to the u.k.
Me: Sees flags being used for CANZUK
Me, an intellectual: So you're saying Hawaii has a shot!
Not even joking.
Hawaii already wants out of the US. Like somebody else I know, they would like their Nationality back.
(PS. The UK didn't choose their flag for them.)
@@andyhart358 It's interesting they have it despite never being part of the British Empire.
@@Croz89 I did chuckle when I went past the Federal Building in Honolulu and saw it flapping in the breeze.
An amalgamation of the American layout of stripes, with the 'ole Red, White, and Blue. . . . . . I've seen worse.
If you end up including the USA in the deal than this would be the greatest power to ever be considering the countries would own about 30-40% of earth and have the greatest economy to ever exist. The trade and the global coverage would be astounding but people are also forgetting democracies need to stick together this includes Hong Kong Taiwan and Myanmar we need them also in these deals especially since they also have trade routes within the Pacific Ocean this would be a war of democracy verses dictatorship which will prevail?
I’m a little confused as to why “not being the main trading partners” factors into the equation at all. It is not as if by making it easier to trade within CANZUK would make it harder to trade with anyone else...
true, the US isnt in the EU so is TLDR suggesting we shouldnt of joined the EU because they arent our #1?
Trade deals are complex and involve concessions and giving countries preferential access. Is it worth it for insignificant trading partners? The time and energy/concessions would be much more worthwhile spent with countries for which significant trade flow is a reality.
@@jasonwarner8219 yes, they are only insignificant at the moment due to decades of trade barriers caused by Britain’s EU membership.
Prior to entry into the EEC most of Britain’s trade was with commonwealth nations. Now the UK is out of the EU it can return to such level.
Not many here seemed to have grasped this fact.
Fully agree. The point here is that there is significant scope here for all four countries to increase there trading opportunities as well as new surrounding markets. Seems lost on TLDR. And then race card was pulled out at the end...which really killed this and highlighted the items bias.
🇦🇺 CANZUK WHEN? 🇦🇺🇬🇧🇳🇿🇨🇦
Australia doesn't want freedom of movement. We already rejected it - it would negatively impact us as will Britain bullying us to fuck us over agriculture which is why we have nothing close to a deal yet. We already have Free Trade Agreements with CA and NZ. We've been trading with Britain the entire time already even when they were in the EU. We're quite capable of negotiating a separate trade deal, plus Britain recently applied to join the CPTPP trade bloc too (the thing AU, NZ and CA are already in) and what actually goes through the mind of someone that thinks directly challenging and excluding the US is a good idea here? You know, the US - far more important to us economically and militarily than Britain could ever be, as they've stuck by us for 70 years under ANZUS, even under Trump, they're deeply entrenched in the Asia Pacific with their military bases and they're the largest military on earth and you want to tell them to fuck off and deliberately exclude them for a racist... oh I'm sorry what else do I mean. Ummmm...white people only Commonwealth club nope, that sounds pretty racist too. Umm... what else - as a counter to China? On no wait that already exists with the US and the CPTPP and negotiating individual FTAs with the UK without handing over sovereignty or directly damaging Australian and regional interests. Soooo racist delusional white people thing it is then I guess.
@@taranullius9221 "White club" why cause we excluded nations with crippling amounts of poverty that would lead to mass immigration into 🇦🇺🇳🇿🇬🇧🇨🇦 and excluded a couple dictatorships like Singapore and Burma In FOM? Get real.
What does the U.S have to do with this? Trade isn't a pick and choose, you can have it both ways. As you already said the UK is joining the TPP meaning CANZUK will already be 50% done now it's just down to FOM.
"Directly challenging and excluding the U.S" we all know that
A. America would not sign up to something with FOM.
B. That Canada would be flooded by American immigrants driveing up housing prices whenever the party someone doesn't like wins. A good example would be the Canadian immigration sight crashing due to over use after Trump won in 2016.
C. If they joined under the Democrats now in a few years the Republicans would just pull them out only for a few years later to re join under the democratics over and over. No thanks
The reason people want 🇦🇺🇳🇿🇬🇧🇨🇦 to have closer military relations is because we ALL depend on the U.S way to much. Australia is just another Pawn on the American chess bored nothing more nothing less. Such a good feeling.
But if you dislike CANZUK I respect you're opinion
@@taranullius9221 Don’t forget that each CANZUK nation are all multicultural societies. Canada for example has majority french speaking people in Quebec and The UK is home to large ethnic communities such as Black, Asian, Mixed Race etc. Islam is also the second biggest religious group in the UK
Hopefully never
@Eric Bergström many people in the UK wants to abolish Human rights that don't sound too good to me
I really want this to happen as a Canadian.
As a Brit I agree
As a brit as well I also agree
And as a Brit, neither do I.
*Friendship ended with European Union*
*Now Canada, Australia, and New Zealand are my best friends*
This is kind of like a guy who loses all his friends in a nasty divorce, so he starts calling buddies from high school.
@@Jermbot15 Or more precisely people who attended the same school that he used to bully.
Damn Mudasir not again...
Good for you.
Meanwhile in the grown up world....we need customers not this whites only BS
@@julianshepherd2038 wtf are you on about?
I would love to see this happen, since we have so much in common.
I love how the crest has 3 animals representing the nations they come from, and also a lion.
@@leming400 Canada has extinct T-rexes. If Britain can use a Lion, I want a T-rex.
@@leming400 The Lion was actually inherited from the old Scottish flag. When Scotland formed the UK, it was inherited by England many years later. Something to do with being a symbol of both Christianity and kingship.
@@HamishDuh2nd The traditional flag of Britain from Saxon times was actually a Wyvern, if you want to talk about cool mythical creatures on flags
As a Canadian, I am deeply ashamed of our national animal, sure it's hardworking and smart, but we could have literally taken a polar bear. That's a literal killing machine, an apex predator.
@@c.d.b6713 Come on in NZ we have a fat lazy flightless Bird who sleeps during the day!
I'm a Brit and I think its a great idea
Same here 🇦🇺
How would you feel about a federation that includes the US? Dependent on adopting the metric system, of course :D
@@Jay-jq6bl We already use both imperial and metric in the UK as a matter of course. Just some of the measures are different between the US and UK like Gallon.
Oddly don't remember the US having a yard (3ft) which is odd.
@@Jay-jq6bl The US is too big to part of the union, but the union and US should work very closely. As for metric and imperial, people should be allowed to use whatever units are common in the market, switching benefits nobody.
Let’s get the band back together
Love that reply.
The English Commonwealth has been reborn
CANZUK is just the start.
Many more opportunities to come.
just more Brexit bull. Lets leave one block to join another less practical and less financially beneficial one.
@@lateknight4754
Not under the thumb of EU regulations however hard they try.
BIG advantage !
We were never 'under the thumb' of the EU. We were its second biggest economy and one of its three most influential member states. But we are where we are and CANZUK is a real opportunity.
When I heard "British Leyland cars", my first thought was: Poor people of Canada, Australia and New Zealand. What have they done to deserve this.
Refer to Made in UK Toyota Corolla Hatchbacks (right-hand drive) imports into Australia.
@Carl Stone The British car industry was in decline from the 1960s, Thatcher had faults but this certainly wasnt on her. As previously stated, poor management and poor union leadership and constant strikr action were key. Anything else is just revisionist history. Some poor decisions from British Leyland didnt help, too many mergers, producing cars which main competition were also from BL, not expanding their export market (although this option was harmed by the poor build quality and reputation damage during the 1970s).
Could have been worse, they could have bought Russian.
@@waltertaylor44 strike action was only ever considered because workers and unions saw the direction industry was taking with shoddy management as you say, offshoring, privatisation, failures to properly invest and failure to prevent declining labour relations with industrial workforces.
@Leigh Garfield I don't know exactly but I think as a foreigner the UK has to much bankers and lawyers and not enough technicians and ingenieurs. True or wrong ?
The main benefit in CANZUK is in acting as a economic and security block in an increasingly volatile word. CANZUK would have a population of 140 million, a GDP of 6.3 trillion USD and 18 million km² of land - certainly a force to be reckoned with.
Ud still be irrelevant (a rounding error) when comparing with the EU, China and the USA
@@mattia8327 You are correct, CANZUK would still be smaller than the USA, China & the EU but CANZUK would be 4th in economic weight after those 3, at about 1/3 the size of the US or China and 1/2 the EU, I'd hardly call CANZUK irrelevant or a rounding error. Don't forget CANZUK has also excellent economic and military relations with both the USA & the EU, not to mention several of the next most important countries in the world including Japan, India, South Korea, Brazil and Mexico.
@@rebbiakiva A more significant factor would be that they are well geographically positioned to facilitate worldwide international trade to and from the three larger powers.
The US has become less and less willing to continue to expend money and resources on mainraining their large navy, which has helped to maintained a secure shipping nerwork for international trade for decades.
Theoretically, CANZUK could take on that responsibility. Even further to this, they could even provide regional collection and distribution hubs based in their respective nations of those Regions.
Essentially this would also allow a means of facilitating mutually equitable trade between nations that would otherwise not be able to do so.
We should go for it. No other countries have so much in common historically and culturally as Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. We would have so much to gain if we renewed our links. Separate, autonomous democracies with shared values.
India jamaica and ireland should also be included
@@seancarmody7873 the issue with India is free movement.
CANZUK’s population would be 137 million.
India has a population of 1.3 billion.
And with India’s gdp per capita being $2,000 and CANZUK’s gdp per capita being 47,000. There would be crazy amounts of immigration.
Jamaica also has the same problem but to a much lesser extent, because there population is much smaller than India’s.
And Ireland is already in the EU. Which means we’d all have to follow the same regulations as the EU for it to work (we don’t want to do that)
I would be fine with the Caribbean islands joining tho, but I don’t think they would be happy about it. Most skilled workers would just leave and they’d suffer with brain drain and there native population being displaced, maybe even making them the minority in there own country.
There’s just no other country within the commonwealth apart from these 4 that we could start a close union with.
@@seancarmody7873 Jesus Ireland wants nothing to do with that
@David Williams the U.K. and Australia are having free movement discussions at the moment regardless of CANZUK.
😬
@@joshbentley2307 We explicitly ruled out freedom of movement already. We already trade with Britain, we're negotiating a trade deal just with them on our own and that's all we need to do because we already have FTAs with CA and NZ and Britain have also applied to join the CPTPP trade bloc with us, CA and NZ. Even our conservatives aren't as stupid as to resurrect deliberately insulting, exclusionary white supremacy in the faces of our most important economic, regional, security and trade partners - none of whom are Britain. Tony Abbott with his Imperial arsekissing, the couple of rags you'll find on Google saying as such and the CANZUK propaganda people - who lie to you openly - are not going to change geopolitical reality. They say Scot Morrison has expressed support for CANZUK on their Wiki page - but he hasn't. The citation doesn't mention CANZUK at all. Ditto Ardern who apparently "supported" CANZUK but when you check the citation it doesn't.
Mate, lets do this CANZUK deal now including Free Movement
Canadian Here.. The Sooner Canada, And The U.K. Join The CANZUK Union So Much The Better..
🇬🇧🇬🇧♥️♥️
Get your vaccine manufacturing here ! !
Why!?
LOL. Canadian? LOL. Then why do you punctuate like a Moscow tenament house troll. LOL. Get yourself a better phrasebook, Vladmir. LOL
Australian here. I feel the same
As a Brit I think this is an amazing idea, i hope it happens in my life time
Rudyard Kipling looking down on Canzuk 2050 🥲
It’s so annoying how the uk government are always slow to implement anything new
@Bigbradwolf I’m a New Zealander and I think it’s a silly idea. And I don’t know of a single person who thinks it’s a good idea.
@Bigbradwolf And what makes you say that? I'm business person and I think it's plain silly.
I mean what would we actually get out of it? _Maybe_ a customer for wool.
But we'd get plenty of negatives, such as more of these 2-pound mediocre or limited poms with rubbish entitled attitudes who come here thinking that their own sweat smells better and their insolent behaviour in the workplace and tendency to try and play little games.
@Bigbradwolf P.S. I don't know what planet of clueless you come from, but there was nothing"crazy" about the UK joining the EEC. It was and still is a far more massive market and one which the UK fitted into nicely.
It's no coincidence that the UK was stagnating economically between 1945-75, especially compared to mainland European nations like Germany, the Netherlands, France, Italy, whose economies were booming. Yet a few years after 1973, the UK's economy was booming. That's why the UK had been wanting to join since the late 1950s.
As an sports fan it would be beneficial so we can be good at Soccer, Cricket, Rugby and Ice Hockey
Football*
@@dit_8424 Canada has a sport called Canadian football league basically it's American football with a few new rules
@@dit_8424 we have a football team anyways
TFC? I think
🍻 share a pint with me if you want to join this union.
🍻
I’m underage so I’ll share some tea 🍵🍵
🍻 sure thing spark
🍻
Im all ABOOT that beer!
Canzuk sounds like a cannabis company 😂
Live the dream! lol
Lots of those in Canada
Hopefully canada can trade some with us :)
@@FriedEgg101 BREAKING NEWS: CANZUK trade puts a smile on the faces of millions :)
@@FriedEgg101 we can only dream 😂👌
French here. Citizens of Canada, Australia and NZ, I wish you good freaking luck. You're gonna need this.
The Var here. Well said Benjamin.
Why?
We don't want it
@@garrenwright256 The brits may beg you to start an alliance and after you finally agreed they will complain about everything, leave you all behind and pretend it was all your fault in the first place. Pro-tip : if they ever entertain the idea of taxing tea, just call us and we'll be on our way.
Canadian here. The whole CANZUK project is the brainchild of some far right think-tanks and is supported by the major right-wing party in each nation. While the vague notion of closer ties is broadly popular in all 4 countries (we've got a lot of history together), none of the three former colonies has any interest whatsoever in giving up their sovereignty (and the British right seems awfully fond of reminiscing about the Empire... the rest of us don't). Because it's exclusively a fairly far right plan, it will end up becoming a political issue opposed by other political parties (and in Canada, the Tories are NOT the default governing party... 60% of Canadians hate them and 70% won't vote for them unless they're angry at the centrist Liberal party). Basically, the centre and left in these various countries will rip the teeth out of any CANZUK proposal that goes too far. It will get painted as a racist, historically regressive project if pushed too far.
As an alliance and possibly as a free movement zone, it might be viable. As a free trade zone, it's pretty redundant. The three non-UK countries already have a free trade deal via the CPTPP and the UK is looking into joining that trade deal. Basically the UK's mostly a cultural and military partner for the other Commonwealth realms in this idea. We're allies. The real appeal of it is creating a second tier large block of roughly equal partners (the rest can counterbalance the UK) rather than being stuck in American orbit (when the US isn't terribly stable).
And if you are wondering about Quebec, l'idée d'une alliance plus proche est populaire même chez nous (environs 65% en faveur au Québec) mais bien sûr seulement si on contrôle les affairs culturelles et linguistiques chez nous. On aime bien les australiens, néo-zélandais et même les britanniques (malgrés nos pépins envers leurs ancêtres et l'empire, on n'a rien contre les britanniques d'aujourd'hui et on a plus en commun culturellement que l'on admet). On est habitué d'être entouré d'une mer anglophone et comme les autres canadiens, on cherche quelque chose pour balancer dans une autre direction que les américains.
All that said, it is a completely impractical free trade zone (and would overlap existing free trade). None of the three other nations would buy into British Empire part 2 and each would insist on equal status. If the UK can't even manage to keep Scotland and Wales happy in a union together, it's folly to assume they could keep three nations whose national identity is rooted in having broken off from the UK in any strong union. As a military alliance alongside NATO, yeah, lots of potential there. Free movement... iffy... very different immigration rules in these four countries.
reducing barriers makes sence even if economic impact is small
That statement has impact.
Not if it would cause barriers to be erected with a much more significant partner. We don't live in the 18th century, no matter what the "buccaneering britain" propaganda says. Trade these days is formalised around several large blocs (the EU, ASEAN, MERCOSUR, USMCA/NAFTA, GCC, CIS etc.) who negotiate between them. Self-exclusion from these blocs for anyone other than a full-bore economic superpower like China is a bad position to be in.
@@lmlmd2714
Are these trading blocks a political union or just trade? Nothing wrong with trade, but political union seems like a train ride to becoming a province of the block.
Canada would somalia if not for the american economy
It should be called "the empire strikes back"
I’m from the uk and that’s fck funny🤣
TLDR: They all speak English
French speaking Canadians: Do we mean nothing to you?
Canadians that speak other languages: Meh.
Frence people would tell you catagorically that Canadians can't speak French, and incidentally, you're speaking English lol
@@francissaunders4050 , Quebec is by far the largest Francophone region other than France. Quebecois French is different from French French just like Austrian or Swiss German is different from German German. Interestingly, Quebecois French is in some ways more pure. I once had a Parisian scornfully tell me that the Quebecois used "le stationnement" for "parking lot" instead of the correct "le parking".
@@stuartschaffner9744 I was on holiday in Greece and met a guy from Quebec and some French guys told him his French was an abomination and told him to speak English lol
@@Sarcasm_Corporation The Royal Navy dissuaded Nova Scotia, Quebec decided to stick the with British due to the disdain protestants in the 13 colonies showed towards Catholics.
I think it'll be beneficial, its not like it will lock us out of other trade
"escaped the jack"
bye jack
Union Jack is actually Canada's second official flag. They call it the Royal Union Flag. So Canada didn't escape the jack...
You'll still see the union jack or the royal Union flag flying alongside the the maple leaf and red ensign in Canada though.
@@ryanhuntrajput474 no u won’t ummm
@@eduardm2 it’s Union flag
As a Canadian, not against this idea. Has many potential benefits.
Any chance we can get a Canada/EU trade agreement video? (CETA)
@@Gary-bz1rf the EU also threatened to block Britain from sending vaccines to Northern Ireland.
You already have FTAs with Australia and New Zealand and actually you've signed a deal with Britain recently though that was mainly extending existing conditions pending more negotiations and anyway Britain applied to join the CPTPP now the thing that we're already all in. None of us need this imperialist bullshit.
@@taranullius9221 What do you have against it? Labor mobility is far from a reality between us. Allowing labor to move to where it's most productive will benefit us all.
So to trade with France (40 km) or to trade with Australia (10000 km) ? The price of same goods gonna be too expensive. Geography matter's.
Why not both ? Start to destination a trip to France is going to be way more than 40km , im in South East England and the eurostar is still more than 40km away and container ships hauling thousands times more than one lorry isn't that much more costly just time consuming
@@maroonstarsface "just" time consuming
Trade isn’t mutually exclusive.. you can trade with both nations simultaneously.
Its not an either or, trade with the EU will continue regardless and free trade deals will continue to be signed with other nations around the world at break neck speed. An alliance among Canzuk nations would go beyond trade while respecting the rights of individual nations to create there own laws
it's cheaper to buy form china than from France byway... so distance does not dictate price.
I like that, I would love to go to NZ and Australia when this problem that the world has. I would also love to support Australia more as their is only so much we can do for them in the current trading issues Australia has with China.
Freedom of movement won't work either so keep dreaming. You're a dreamer :)
Obviously you have never been, it;s a long haul even by avation standards
@@Wipeout2806 works fine between Australia and New Zealand.
Since CANZUK is just opening Trans-Tasman agreement up to another two nations what specific problems do you actually envisage?
@@jonzu217 all good things are worth the wait.
I once spent a month in New Zealand. I would prefer to live there than a European country.
If I can move to Canada easily then I'm all for it.
💯💯💯
not if it means "Screamin O'Toole" is PM. He's known as the "trump of the north"
The uk went for brexit in a lot of ways to block people coming into the country. It's ironic then that British people don't think Canada, Australia or New Zealand don't want random wasters from the uk. Of course you can live in work in these countries anyways today if you have an in demand job. But I just wanted to highlight the hypocrisy that UK people have. It's absolutely unreal. And of course there were other reasons for leaving but that was a massive one, even if you personally weren't a part of it.
If you've got the right qualifications it's probably quite easy. Try it! Alternatively if you haven't what are going to do? Go on the dole?
Just heads up, they have French speakers there(if you don't like French). Anyway, Canada sounds like a good country to go to. Even Australia and New Zealand.
Lets please do this. Literally we need this
On that CANZUK crest the other countries have animals native to their country, whereas we have a lion. Shouldn't it be a hedgehog or something?😂
Nah, a Badger is way more fitting.
2 crossed earthworms with a crown above.
No definitely a pigeon can’t see enough of the bloody things
Falcon small fast and deadly.
@@kevinmorris4168 Yeah, White Falcon on white Ground.
it is also worth noting that the deal of 'CANZUK' already exists, the trans tasman deal is what canzuk is after, it was the deal to be extended to UK and canada.
Why? Australia and NZ are neighbours, fought for Britain in two world wars.and both are secure multicultural migrant nations.Why would they want to go back to days of Empire? Besides the UK already has trade and FOM with its neighbour, Eire
@@ausbrum its nothing to do with the empire, does it not say anything to you when the ONLY people who mention the empire are those against it? because they dont understand it, its the 4 most similar nations on earth creating a trade union for the mutual benefit of all 4 nations, for it to be 'the empire' britain would have to be in charge, britain is not in charge at all, no one would be.
@@ausbrum BTW the UK is more multicultural than all 3 other nations combined.
@a basketboy Similar cultures? It is the Australia Day week end, native ownership is being discussed. You know SFA about Australian culture and thinking, and as for "education" Australia has yet to produce anything as dumb as Boris Johnson or Brexit or an elite university like Oxford taking a donation from a tax exile.I find it offensive that you imagine Australians and Kiwis think just like Brits.And for skilled migration , it already exists. It isn't just open to Anglos
@@v_cpt-phasma_v689 Try understanding what is being discussed and celebrated this Australia Day week end and then tell me that Australia is "similar". It thinks differently. It acts differently. And "similarity" isn't just defined by language.
I was brought up in an age of NZ butter and lamb, Aussie wool, beef and sugar and was shocked at the enormous price hikes of the 70s.
Tbf I ent giving up Scottish beef as an english man
Backin the 70s, in Australia, the farmers formed cooperatives, the entered the Government market and stored produce to keep the prices stable. Later on, Australia lost wool sale contracts to Canada (?), because Canada (?) offered a fresh clip, over wool the clip that had been in storage for a few years.
I can’t see how UK farmers can compete against Australia’s industrial scale farming. In the meat industry, even the US is pressed. Brit farmers might harvest scores of acreage; In Oz, it might thousands of acres, with large scale machine harvesting. Huge economies of scale in Australia’s favour. Though, New Zealand survives OK, with Agriculture but it is beholden to China, as China China has planned. Vassals via the Brick and Road Initiative. Australia’s economy is less exposed, because Agriculture represents 3% of GDP. But, farmers vote, and have their own regional party in coalition with fellow conservatives.
In the Asia Pacific Century, the UK would be an odd fit. Although, Australia and the UK have just signed a FTA. Excluding China, and with the US rejoining, the Trans Pacific Partnership would represent 40% of World GDP.
I do agree with the free movement of people, owing to a common language and heritage, except French Canadians might not agree. Tourism and transnational employment opportunities, great.
Every time something cool is about to happen everybody starts calling it racist and it falls through.
Standard modern behaviour, if conservatives come up if a good idea you can't argue with just call it racist
Nobody said it was racist tho.
@@user-gh4lu8fx7l Very not true. A bunch of people have, and will continue to do so. Kinda sad, as it has nothing to do with race lol
@@user-gh4lu8fx7l
Wrong. Many people do.
@Fuck TH-cam probably won't because of us bases and interest's in a Scotland controlled by England.
As long as the French / Quebec Canadian influence is respected, this could really work. But it can't be a "long live the empire" nostalgic grouping.
🙁🙁 why not
I'm all for agreements especially with CAN, NZ and AUS - to have free travel - work - labour standardization , greater military integration etc.- but no new flags - and we know all this discussion is a "long live the empire" nostalgic grouping. Canada is a bilingual country and none of the other 3 are. I also do not see Canada making any changes to the current FTA agreement with the US.
@@d0ubled1amond The U.K. has Welsh, Scottish, Scottish Gaelic, Irish Gaelic and English.
NZ has English and Maori
@@d0ubled1amond also why would Canada have to change there FTA with the US?
@@d0ubled1amond New Zealand is also pushing to reintegrate its bilingual past with its native language. Officially, English isn't even an official language in New Zealand. Where as NZ Maori and NZ Sign Language are legally official languages.
I said this at the time, and I'll keep saying it until it stops being true.
Brexiteers only ever seem to talk about the UK as if it were in the middle of the Pacific, and not (as is the case) literally swimming distance from France
Well considering we live on an island nation that has warred with its ‘neighbours’ for nearly forever is that really unexpected? Britain‘s closest allies have never been in Europe aside from maybe Portugal and Poland who we have long standing ties with well prior to the EU.
@@maxpowerii7368 I'm talking about trade logistics. So even with that, it still makes no sense. It's pure fantasy
@@maxpowerii7368 Arguably Britain's closest ally in both world wars was France.
@@daveemberton5271 Maybe in the First World War but not the Second.
And Remainers seem to act like it's literally impossible to trade goods with other countries unless you're in the same bloc. How does free movement with Canada have anything to do with buying stuff from Europe?
Very much in favour of this, even to the point where we all spell "favour" exactly the same way.
Canadian here. Definitely a fan of CANZUK and have always wanted to travel/potentially live in these countries because of our shared but distinct cultures and outlooks. Obviously, it would be best to turn into this slowly by trying to amp up trade first especially. With China on the rise, it only seems advantageous to keep our allies close and although we Canadians have felt some of the heat from them, I know Australia and New Zealand has it even worse. Although the distance is larger than normal, I believe that Canada can implement a new trade system to help mind the gap between Australia, New Zealand and the UK, as to help make trade more viable. Definitely would like to see where this goes.
I also miss the Jack. I still wave both flags.
Ahh I see. The UK wants an economic union where it can dictate rules to the others, just like in the old days.
Working closer with Australia would provide an opportunity to solve jail overcrowding.
Nsw governor sweats nervously
@@aussiegod4269 Premier
I think I want to know how many fully qualified Kiwi, Aussie and Canadian doctors and nurses are remotely interested in finding employment with an NHS versus how many fully qualified Brittish doctors and nurses might be interested in seeing how much further their money can go in Canada, New Zealand or Australia.
My cynicism suggests this is not a solution for the expertise shortage caused by the loss of freedom of movement.
Absolutely, thank you
I’m a Canadian who moved to the UK and working in the NHS. The major reason I moved here is to travel around Europe. The pay is significantly lower here in the UK though so other than travel opportunities I don’t see the UKs health system being particularly attractive to work in for Canadians, Australians or kiwis.
You know how you'll get more nurses and doctors? Raise their wages rather than trying to exploit people and pay them less.
It's not the world responsibility to train our doctors, it's ours.
NHS pays peanuts, no one that I know studying medicine in Australia has plans to go to the UK.
I would love for there to be free movement between CANZUK countries, it seems like it is really popular too. It makes so much sense because even though the countries are far apart they are all very similar.
it's a fantasy & will never happen. Even in globalised world, trade is geographical. For UK's economy not to collapse it will have to rejoin the single market & customs union so it can trade with the rest of EEA/EU nations. Once it does this, UK wouldn't be able to create its own new trade deal. So unless the entire EU also agree to freedom of movement with CANZUK but that looks unlikely. But would be cool nonetheless
@@kw2142 really? Why is it that most of what comes into this country comes from south east Asia then?
Australia’s main trading partner for years was the pre-common market UK. And now there are hundreds of container ships trudging the sea lanes of the world. Why can’t the CANZUK nations trade together more?
@@nigethesassenach3614 ofc commonwealth countries could trade more, every1 could potentially trade more. i'm all for removing trade barriers (as long as it's ok for the environment). But the idea that Uk trade with the commonwealth could replicate EU trade is for the birds. Even at the height of the British empire, Britain did most of its trade with Europe. It's simple geography. A fact brexiteers can't get their heads around for some reason. Just look at a map FFS
@@kw2142 no one said anything about replacement ffs, just that it’s now possible as the EU was restricting the possibility. What, you think the UK doesn’t trade with the EU anymore? They literally have free tariff trade. Most of their disputes are over fish. Prior to the EU (including EEC) they were quite literally eachothers biggest trading partners excluding the USA, which Britain has maintained as the largest trading partner since 1785 😂
An improvement is an improvement no matter how small.
as the actress said to the Bishop
Wanna hear you say that if your job gives u a pound increase on your annual salary.... 😂
In other news water is wet and the sky is up. What a facetious comment lol
if the improvement costs too much time and resource, one might argue its not worth it.
@@JeanWayne
And what are the "great costs" of creating CANZUK?
Simon Bridges isn’t the leader of the opposition anymore. He’s been replaced twice :-(
I mean it happened so quickly you'd be forgiven for getting that mistake. Who's the Nats leader? Simon Bri- oh wait no it's Todd Mul- no scrap that it's Judith Collins... oh she's just lost an election the worst ever defeat for National in an election in New Zealand... damn
"Crest crowded with animals"
You just commited a war crime against r/Heraldry
I'm not surprised to hear about some people complaining and seeing this as a racist angle, not everything the first world does has to include the 3rd or 2rd world countries. In fact they can form their own union if that's what they wish, they can do it if they out their minds to it.
As a Brit I love this
I’m from South Africa, and even I noticed in the first 5 minutes of the video that it wasn’t about the “commonwealth”. I was born after apartheid, and learned a lot about it in school. The Tory government is just a British version of the old national government from 70 & 80’s South Africa.
As a ex SouthAfrican now liveing in NZ. I can absolutely see why NZ would be included and SA not. The culture is drastically diffrant the views of life goals and loyalties are diffrant. It is not a race thing its a cultural one. NZ and britain is unlikely to ever seriously dissagree on any major international topic's. SA and britain would likely not last long before they disagree on something and end up diminishing the value of the entire block. This deal would likely be less economical in nature and more of an alliance with common goals and combined negotiation and military power aswell as one of conviniance. Its less of a deal born out of big gains and more a deal that makes sense due to haveing essentially no downsides.
SA wouldn’t want to be involved anyway. But provided they get their national development stats to a level similar of other CANZUK nations then I have no problem with them joining in the medium to distant future.
The same country that is staying quiet about white farmers being slaughtered..
Yeah.. we aint the same.
To draw comparisons between the UK government and apartheid in South Africa is ridiculous. The UK is one of the most multicultural countries in the world, but we are a very small country, and mass immigration has put immense pressure on our old towns and cities that were not built for such large numbers of people. People who voted to leave the EU aren't against immigration, we're against the quantity. There are financial inequalities that need to be addressed, but there is no apartheid here.
@@brandon3872 I would disagree with the UK being multicultural. It's pretty white if you ask me. Out of the four countries, Canada is by far is the most multicultural country. Also, Canadians seem to be less racist than the Brits.
My view, as an Australian, is towards further building the TPP, again with the US. The future is in the Asia Pacific. The TPP could negotiate collectively with the EU. The UK is not required.
Canada can act as stop over place for goods coming from Australia and new Zealand to UK and vice versa
low trade volume shouldn't be a barrier. makes the deal less significant, but qualitatively just as valid
is it more valid or beneficial than the UK making individual trade deals with these nations?
@@CortezHoratio yes because it means we can get better deals with the larger economies.
The EU doesn’t have a trade deal with the US, India or China.
CANZUK would get one with all three.
@@joshbentley2307 That is definitely not certain. Canzuk would probably make a deal with the US more difficult then seperately. For one, Canada and Australia already have FTA's with the US and NZ was going to be part of the now failed TPP agreement. It would be weird that Canada and Australia would give up their US FTA's for Canzuk.
The reason the EU doesn't have FTA's with China, India and the US is exactly size, both sides have a good position regardless and will therefor not accept anything that is not good enough. Getting Canzuk together would make FTA's more difficult too, not only because they are larger and can (try to) demand more, but also the Canzuk nations don't all have the same priorities, thus they themselfs will have to find a good balance.
A trade deal doesn’t have to be an all encompassing FTA, it could mean lowering just a few tariffs, even in one small sector or apply to a handful of goods. Anything that increases trade would be good but it’s never going to replace trade with your neighbours, why should it, it should be about increasing over all trade.
@@joshbentley2307 like how?
you do realize each trade deal you sign you have to agree to align your own regulations to whatever is requested by those with who you sign those deals with.
WTF makes you this it would ever be possible to sign a deal with USA and China at the same time? their requests would be utterly incompatible.
Or China and India at the same time - there is a fierce rivalry between them and both would demand Uk pick a side
24 hour 500£ flight to Australia
is obviously much more convenient than
1 hour 30£ flight to France
Australia is doing far better than Europe right now.
@Henry Bushell
I can go to a cinema right now and sit next to a complete stranger without a mask. Employment is up and we are in deep talks with Japan, Vietnam, South Korea and Taiwan on increasing trade. If we were completely dominated by China we wouldn't be able to wage a trade war against them.
@@sambland3903 Lmao, tell that to your mines and politicians. And good luck at the cinema without a mask
And yet more Brits live in Australia than in the EU and more Brits live in Canada than the EU
@@drunkcatphil9911 AFAIK, Brits that live in Australia were moved there against they will in 17th and 18 century
As long as it works for the UK and all countries involved, then why not, our goals and objectives and values are very similar almost the same, plus it's reinforces our committment to our cultural allies, creating a large network militarily to partner with the United States and within my NATO.
I see i as an Australian have always liked the idea, though it doesn't make much sense. As a citizen, I can already travel to NZ freely post Covid, I have no reason to what to go to Canada or Britain minus for tourism but then again I can just go to Sydney. Militarily and politically Australia has served side by side with these countries in every major conflict because of NATO, Commonwealth, and good political friends. And lastly, economically there isn't much to gain, from a personal standpoint I don't see British and or Canadians wanting and or relying on Aussie exports as they have alternative and cheaper options.
Now with massive caviar, this is my opinion I wish no harm by stating what I believe to be true let's have a civil discussion. thank you
Thanks for sharing your comments make a note to my trusted trader , Johnson on wats ap to help you make profit in bitcoin + 1 2 0 .9 3 1 9 2 1 3 1 he's strategies are top notch 🇫🇯
I see your point but I still think with time and negotiation this can be a great idea for Canada 🇨🇦 Australia 🇦🇺 New Zealand 🇳🇿 and the uk 🇬🇧.
@@natmcc7748 yeah this is a very good point I agree, one problem though bearing this thought process in mind I don't think that such a move would please our political overlords, also if it doesn't have huge payouts then I doubt that any of our governments would go for it.
@@natmcc7748 yeah most likely
Well first I would say that more free trade is never a bad thing, so even if it does not help, theoretically it can't hurt (unless it becomes an EU 2.0).
Second, each of the nations in CANZUK are moving more towards a internet/intellectual economy. Physical trade just becomes less important as time moves on, making the whole "to far to trade" thing kind of moot.
Third, I would expect all trade to increase with CANZUK as political and trade barriers get broken down, the USA and Japan manage to trade just fine with the whole world, so I don't think its as big of a problem as people think it is.
As a NZer, I have not interest in being dictated to by Britain again
As a Canadian, I feel ya.
Did you even watch the video. It’s a mutual Trade union.
Bruh this is a trade union, not anything else.... glad to know Kiwis also know how to use their arse as a mouthpiece lmao
So ungrateful of you.
@@Tobberz it's not just a trade union, there's the explicit mention of military aid, freedom of movement, and political alignment.
I’m Canadian an absolute love this idea! Never met a Canadian who didn’t. It would be very hard tho let’s not sugar coat it but I think it would put CANZUK in a real position to bargain, as well as grow our collective internal market!
Wouldn't it piss off the French Canadians though?
@@chrisklitou7573 Quebec has 70% support
@@chrisklitou7573 as long as the language and culture is preserved in Quebec there should be no issues.
I’m against it. I’m indigenous. This is just more colonization. The indigenous populations of each countries don’t even want it. It is just British bootlickers.
@louis george well seeing that Canada is doing colonization. It is but with extra steps. No one asked the Maoris or the Australian aboriginals. All I see is white Anglos wanting that. If you want to apart of the British go fucking live with them.
Honestly, Canzuk seems more appropriate to a Gundam's franchise mobile suite name, Zeon side...
Thank you for this wonderful thought.
"Now Dougal, one more time: These cows are very small, those cows are far away."
It worked very well in the past. And will do so again.
@@melvinfarrell4684 It only 'worked' for Britain when it dictated trade terms, once the others become 'independent' the UK had FA trade with them, hence why the Brits joined the EU. Read stuff don't just make it up
why? already the uk has started getting fruit from Colombia 🇨🇴 and waiting to finalise an agreement with Ghana 🇬🇭. i just bought some bananas with a Colombian sticker. on for a good price.
'Will it still be considered a class 3 relic...once they....?'
Love the father ted quote! Haha
From Australia's perspective, it would make sense for us to urgently liberalise and expand trade with as many countries as possible, particularly those in south and east Asia. We're in a very uncomfortable position where our largest trading partner (by far) is waging a trade war against us. I have nothing against CANZUK, but it will in no way compensate for lost trade with China and to think otherwise is delusion.
On the Canadian side we are not even aware of this project. xD
For us, Brexit or not does not change much. The UK will try to enter into partnerships with as many countries they can to avoid suffering too much from immediate consequences of their mistake with the EU. For the Canada, this will not change anything: our main partner and from very, very far is the United States (and under the Biden administration we can expect a growing relationship between us). Even Mexico is more important as a partner than the UK.
For the two others countries they have to deal with the great distance. The better for them would have been to trade with EU, ironically. Perhaps, with luck, Brasil and USA will try to find a way to help the tea drinkers. x)
Stop feeding the dragon dummy.
China will mean your destruction. The Western world needs to break away from reliance on Chinese trade.
We already have free trade agreements with Canada, New Zealand and the US. The only one missing is the UK and we can negotiate that separately without destroying our own interests chasing some racist Imperialist delusion.
@@taranullius9221 I think this is more about free movement.
Europe...is full of Europeans.
CANZUK countries have much greater non-european ethnic diversity than the EU countries.(except maybe France... it's pretty diverse)
like how america being uk's no.1 trade partner is ignored when it comes to economic proximity. The EU custom union is responsible for diminished trade with UK - which prior was Aus biggest trade partner
AS A CANADIAN I LOVE THIS
Until we lose Quebec, that is.
@@EidolonSpecus Why do you think Quebec would leave? They haven't left yet.
@@Jay-jq6bl They haven't left yet because we haven't done anything stupid like this before. CANZUK would likely swamp Canada with way too many monolingual Anglo's which would put Quebec and their national interests in a lot of pressure, destabilizing the union.
"Does not include India, Pakistan, South Africa or the Carribeans"
I have a feeling that this list probably isn't the most interested in a further union that involves Britain.
Frankly its a miracle they are all part of the commonwealth
Jamaica likes the commonwealth I think.
Canada still has the jack and uses it all the time, it just have two flags. The maple is the main one but if you look at military uniform the jack is used all the time still.
No No NO ..why do you want to go down a road you just got out of? ...get this straight while we like some form of this deal realize 1 thing....we will NEVER NEVER let any other country make law's for the Canadian people even if they try to sugar coat it and sneak it in under the mask of being proposed by our government..we have only 1 flag and it's the Maple Leaf. you can do what you want ,but im telling you if you start with the NWO and were all the same bullshit this deal is already dead...this is an economical deal, and sure if politically we find common ground so be it, but we will never let this CANZUK group decide the political or Legal direction Canada will take nor are we interested in sticking our nose's into the an other nation's political business
@@tiborcsizmadi4796 totally agree and i am from the UK trade political and culturally and militarily we should unite but no one parliament should govern all.
I haven't seen a people more pessimist about their own country's Future than the British, Like Damn dawg with that attitude you won't get anything in the first place...
Ever heard a Brazilian talk of his country ?
That's what happens when your economy is in decline and your people are beaten down by 10 years of austerity only to come out of it right before the next recession and covid meaning we will be jumping right the fuck back into austerity soon
It's mainly only the cyber-remainers who are so pessimistic, most normal people like ideas like this and are all for it.
@@Tobberz so what were the benefits of Brexit ? Is the NHS getting their funds yet ?
@@Tobberz lol I love it when people make totally baseless statements online.
"... most normal people like ideas like this ..." how are you quantifying "normal" and how do you personally know what the opinions of the majority of these people are? 🤔
As an Aussie, I don't want this to happen. I have no issue with any of the states, but it's just not reasonable.
👍🇦🇺
If you look at this map, Canada makes the perfect capital to be at the centre of this union (Australia & NZ to the west of Canada, the UK to the east of it).
If this comes to fruition it would definitely make Canada a great power on the world stage.
@@outsideoli7529 Prime Ministers of past and current academics had and still have bold predictions about Canada.
@@gng11 especially with the north passage opening up with climate change, it will make Canada a world trading hub. Plus we are one of the rare places in the world where climate change is making habitability gaining ground instead of losing it. With its vast freshwater reserves, unexploited natural resources, and immense landmass we are in a prime position to receive a lot of population from the climate exodus. Plus most countries kinda tolerate or like us so we are in a good spot in therm of diplomatic power. Our only real weaknesses are our relatively low and aging population and still low automation in industries.
Canada would be a great central point link between East and West.... UK goods > Canada > Transit Rail-road > Canada > Australia+NZ and vice versa.
@@Rasterizing don't forget the north passage, with climate change it gets more and more passable.
CANZUK is a logistical challenge. Politically it sounds and looks good but economically it’s useless...
Not entirely useless, but it's far more logical to (re)join the EU instead.
@@yad-thaddag why would the UK re-join the EU? There's no point, the new UK's deal has all the benefits and no cons.
@@adrian-4767 it doesn't have all the benfits.
What have you been reading?
@@fierrect6089
He's almost right.
The EU UK trade deal has all the benefits and no cons... for the EU.
Agreed, and I'd up the ante from logistical challenge to logistical nightmare/fairytale. Canada and Australia are exporters of raw resources, minerals and oil/gas, with much, much closer and established markets for these goods that are very expensive to transport long distances. Canada -> US, Australia -> Pacific Rim countries, and the UK isn't a high-precision manufacturing country like the US, Germany or Japan anyways, so why would they even buy massive amounts of raw resources anyways even if Australia, Canada, and New Zealand were all in the North Sea?? A total marketing gimmick based on nostalgia for when all our countries were more culturally interlinked.
Kiwi here who lives in UK. I really support this, it's a great idea. I would love to visit Canada and always enjoy working with colleagues from Canada and Australia.
Thanks for sharing your comments make a note to my trusted trader , Johnson on wats ap to help you make profit in bitcoin + 1 2 0 9. 3 1 9 2 1 3 1 he's strategies are top notch 🇫🇯
As a Canadian born and raised in Canada I love the CANZUK idea and can’t wait for it to be implemented. Where ever I travel in the world we always end up making friends with Aussies, Kiwis and Brits. I only need to go to my second cousins and I have family in all four of these countries. While the EU was 27 strangers making up its membership the CANZUK countries are four close family members.
To me the reason it’s just the “Fab Four” (for now) is that we don’t want to risk the alliance with adding in too many countries that are vastly different economically. I hold all my fellow Commonwealth citizens in warm regard but free movement with all those nations would pose the same kinds of challenges that the UK had when the EU expanded in 2001. I know my country’s safety net was already terrible before COVID, opening the door to unchecked migration would stress the system and fray the alliance. I’m not saying that that is a positive thing but we only need to look to history to know how it would work.
You have to start somewhere, and I would be totally in favour of adding in other countries of the Commonwealth to the club as the circumstances allowed for a smooth entry.
For example prior to free movement stronger and closer economic ties could be possible and might accelerate a nation’s progress to being able to join the club entirely.
But what I think will be crucial to the success of CANZUK where the EU faltered is we must always make changes that are best for all countries and not let the grand ambitions of political leaders overrule what is best for all like the EU has done.
But we are not sure if they are going to apply the law of free movement of people
I grew up in UK, we would eat New Zealand Lamb and Australian Beef. The advantage Australia and New Zealand have is they both can feed out their animals all year round, that means they can kill, butcher and ship to the other side of the world and still land it cheaper. European countries had to feed their animals on hay and keep them in barns for 2 months a year.
When UK Joined the EU the cost of living went up considerably. There was a lot of complaining among the UK population.
British Empire 2: Economic Boogaloo
Well played ;-)
lol
... and then we'll take it higher! lol
Canzuk is never happening.
@@tedcrilly46 Awwww gowan, gowan, gowan Father Crilly, will ya not be havin a cuppa CANZUK
kind of annoying they said its majority white but neglected to mention EU is majority white too.
Also the fact that there is nothing wrong or racist about being white, you never hear anything about Africa needing to be more diverse from the usual crowd, do you?
I've always said that CANZUK is the only possible good thing to come from brexit
There are few positives to Brexit regarding trade with Canada. The EU (including the UK) already had a trade agreement with Canada for a huge amount of goods and services (CETA). The UK had a better trading position within a Trade Bloc with 500m population vs 35m population. This is simple negotiations. Now it is 70m vs 35m. And wqwe have much less to offer now the UK is outside of trade lines.
THERE IS NO LOVE FOR "EMPIRE" OUTSIDE OF RIGHT-WING CIRCLES.
@@mackysplace I'm just looking to emigrate pal. Get the hell off this fascist rock
Don't forget to include South Africa and India.
How is this nationalistic attempt to revive the British Empire doing any good? UK fostering ties with all the white English speaking people around the world... It smells of racism. Let's work with these people, they are just like us.... what is not being said is white people just like us.
@@melanieenmats If CANZUK would be racist, so is be the EU. To some people, it's a continuation of some Germans' dreams about "Einheit Europas" from the early 40s. Why is the EU regional? Why there are no plans to create an EU-African free trade area? Why didn't they admit Turkey while they still could? If I interpret this clearly, the goal CANZUK is not the substitute for the EU federal state, but some kind of close political alliance, clearly aimed at increasing the member's broader security against aggressive global powers like China and integrating such actions more closely with the US. As for "openness" to the World, UK will have the CPTPP, which by its nature is just unable be "racist" (another obviously overused term). I'm jealous of the UK, in my country (PL) my vote won't ever mean so much.
Its a brilliant idea, as people of the same tongue and historic roots we are literally brothers and sisters and should be close like all good families are.
Not really, barely 30% of Australians have any significant family connection to UK. Not really taken seriously here.
@@jimgraham6722 It sure helps having a big brother around when you're getting bullied. Better yet, merge to have the strength of the whole family in one body.
As a Brit who married an Aussie and now lives down under, lots of Aussies like a stint in the UK, London especially, but I have met almost none who didn't go home after a year or so. On the other hand Brits who come here mostly stay (and its easy to see why). This likely one way traffic is I think one reason why Australia is the least enthusiastic of the group about CANZUK.
Absolutely. As a Brit I don’t support CANZUK even though I really want to move to those other countries. They all have a much higher quality of life than the UK and free movement would mean Brits will move to those countries in droves and ruin them.
@@beardedbaldie2698 How would they ruin them? Each has different economies, so labor can stay where it's most productive. Canada and Australia have huge land area which is underutilized, so it's only natural that the flow of labor would be towards Canada and Australia. That's not a bad thing though. Especially for those who can't find work in the UK.
@@Jay-jq6bl The UK population is equal to that of Australia, Canada and NZ combined. That’s a lot of people who will be moving! Also, Canada and Australia might be big but most of the land is uninhabitable. That’s why all major metropolitan areas in Australia are on the coast and in Canada along the southern border. A dramatic increase in population will put pressure on public services and infrastructure. The UK is horrendously overpopulated and one of the main reasons why it’s become such a terrible place to live. I’d love to move to Canada or Australia but through the proper visa process. Why should they let me in if they have enough skilled citizens of their own to do a job?
Shame it didn’t mention the immense public support CANZUK has in all countries.
Nobody outside the UK has ever heard of it... And they don't care. It's just an imaginary crutch the UK is attempting to lean on (spoiler: imaginary crutches don't provide much support)
I like your irony 👍
That is the funniest thing I have heard all week.
That may be a little unreliable because it was the CANZUK group themselves that came up with the analytics, it could have been a bit biased.
Although, saying that, I have no qualms with the idea at all. It's not like there's even a downside if trade between the nations isn't as prevalent as one would hope because there'd still be free movement and military aid. What I do think is the case is that, going forward, it will only become easier to sustain large-scale trade across the globe with the advancement of technology. Kind of a future-proofed union.
The CANZUK is a pipe dream. They are too spread out for trade really to become a big thing. New Zeeland and Australia already cooperate a lot. But their next closest CANZUK us Canada which is further away than the US which is a much better partner for both Canada and Auatralia + New Zeeland.
Do it! Even better, recreate the British Empire in a style similar to the EU.
People will always say “but racism”, but I say that we ought to move past the horrors of the past in the interest of a better future. This CANZUK arrangement should be extended to all former British colonies and dominions. Even the US could be invited!
I agree but I don't think anyone but the UK would want to call it the British Empire
@@connormaclean1569 yeah, best to call it something else.
Leave a Political Union to recreate one? Oh yeah that makes sense. /s
@@Mrblob100 Well I mean it been clear how terrible leaving the EU was so I'd say yeh why not
You mean like…. The imperial federation?
don't think you have to apologize to NZ for their economy. I don't think they really care about being an economic power. they're just happy down there being happy and wondering why everyone else hasn't figured it out yet.
Yea its not surprise a country of only 5 million people has the smallest nominal GDP out of the bunch, I guess they did add context with GDP per capita.
No, what Britain did in 1974 is unacceptable and there needs to be cash compensation, as well as an apology
The Netherlands could be part of CANZUK based on the fact that most Dutch people speak a little English and the colors of the Dutch flag are the same as the other members and the N for NZ could double as the N for the Netherlands. Done deal I guess.
The English are going to want you to call their queen the "real Queen".
Thinking with your head will never explain Brexit, it's a faith system.
Go with germany
@@julianshepherd2038 The Netherlands has a King but maybe we can have him wearing a skirt?
@@ddrid854 If the Dutch people start a Nexit I will surely move to Germany which is only an hour driving from my place anyways.
@@CrownRider No other EU country is stupid enough to give up its main customers and sources of supply, as well as its freedom of movement, just to have a nationalist feeling like Brexiteers. Modern EU citizens know that you can't eat nationalism. Nationalism is a relic from the past that nobody in the EU wants anymore because it has only caused disadvantages over the past centuries. The EU is not just a trading bloc, but a guarantor of freedom and peace among its members. Britain has now thrown this under the bus and is struggling to make new friends and trading partners, but unfortunately they are thousands of miles away.
Pros of CANZUK:
1) The CANZUK nations have a lot in common - culture, government, head of state, language, and even cuisine and humour. This makes integration easier than, say, between the UK and far-flung EU nations, who are culturally very different.
2) Trade is less certain for many CANZUK countries. Canada has recently been slapped with US tariffs, the UK left the EU, and Australia is facing Chinese hostility. CANZUK could help to stabilise these economies, especially since the goods traded between them are broadly compatible (e.g. Australia exports raw materials, and the UK imports materials to produce finished products). Given the state of affairs mentioned (with links weakening between existing trading partners), it's likely that a CANZUK trade agreement would noticeably increase trade within the group.
3) A CANZUK union with close strategic ties could be a significant military power - especially in terms of naval coverage - since CANZUK forces could be based and operate anywhere from Western Europe to the South Pacific. All five being part of the "Five Eyes" alliance helps with this.
4) Free movement between CANZUK nations is unlikely to put strain on any one country, since all nations are about as rich as each other. This decreases the likelihood of any one nation being "swarmed" by a large number of migrants.
Cons of CANZUK:
1) The UK is probably not going to want to "rebound" into another union so soon after Brexit.
2) The UK has a bad taste in its mouth about unions in general after many Brits saw the EU has hoovering up sovereignty without proportional accountability to the electorate. A hypothetical CANZUK would have to balance national sovereignty with being an actual, legally-binding union. Too strict, and many will wish to leave. Too loose, and it's not really worth calling a "union".
3) Geography hinders the ability of a CANZUK union to make meaningful trade agreements with other nations. For instance, Canada would be very eager to get a good trade deal with the US, but that would mean that the other CANZUK nations might be bound into a US trade agreement which doesn't suit them. Long distances also means that trade within CANZUK would be slow.
4) Recent "problems with foreigners" (migrant crisis, terrorism, etc.) has made many in the UK pessimistic about "free movement", even with well-liked CANZUK nations. There's also the problem of any single CANZUK nation making free movement agreements with a 3rd party, which could result in them being a gateway for mass migration into the CANZUK system.
I personally like the idea of CANZUK, but there are a lot of kinks to iron out first.
(The argument about "CANZUK being racist" is a non-starter, and - frankly - insulting. The CANZUK nations are already more racially diverse than the EU, and yet the EU isn't accused of racism on that basis. The reason for excluding other nations is mostly due to huge differences in national wealth, which would unbalance any free movement arrangement. Given the chance, millions of Indians (for instance) would fly en masse to CANZUK nations, which would gut the labour pool in India and overburden CANZUK. This would cause serious problems for all nations involved. Cultural and language differences would also make integration more difficult, whereas - as mentioned - CANZUK countries are already extremely close.
Besides, the UK has already accepted millions of immigrants from places such as India, and they're an accepted part of society. Rishi Sunak and Priti Patel are government officials - with Priti Patel being well-liked by Tory voters for her firm stance on illegal immigration. This doesn't sound like "racial discrimination" to me.)
I completely agree.
But number 4 (cons) wouldn’t be as big of an issue as it is within the EU, because CANZUK would be building off of the TTTA agreement between Australia and New Zealand.
In the TTTA agreement people with criminal records and security risks (suspected terrorists) wouldn’t be allowed to move between the countries.
Love how the UK has left the EU only to contemplate a new union, one that can outmuscle the UK's labor supply, farming and fishing economies in just 3 countries.
Makes me wonder why we even left in the first place?
Where did you get the idea the UK is contemplating a union with these three other countries? There might be closer trade in the future, but no equivalent arrangements that the UK had with the EU.
Saying this is a union is like calling NAFTA a union or the TPP a union. It’s an economic trading block with no confederal government like the EU.
It makes perfect sense considering that the UK has the financial resources and technological expertise to dominate these three countries; why worry about fishing, labor supply and farm produces when the UK can simply buy-out all the major industries in these three "Blood is thicker than water" countries.
this is never going to happen tho not to the scale that people want
Yeah but it's not a political union like the EU
I have watched a lot of CANZUK videos and they all seem to miss one very important bond between these countries. They still have the same head of state ie HM Queen Elizabeth II and their military technically still swear allegiance to this head of state. No other union are more closely linked than these countries.
Simon Bridges is not the leader of the NZ National Party in Parliament, it is Judith Collins
It's only called the union jack when flown at sea. I'll leave now...
The whole shitshow is at sea.
Yep. it's the Union Flag
@@BigAlCapwn Why isn't it the "We Invaded Wales Flag"?
@@crose7412 Because of logic
Yeah, but that's like saying Big Ben should be called the Elizabeth Tower. Everyone knows what it means.
An exciting proposal with interesting partners. Well worth a try. Trade can only increase!
Now i've heard it all. A trade agreement between two nations is racist to some people. What is this planet
You seem to be the only person calling a trade agreement racist...What's your agenda, bud? I say this as a rhetorical question, you seem like a twat.
@@mackysplace nope I've seen someone who was part of the EU say it's british white supremacy. Tis truly a tragic world
Only if those nations are mainly white. The same people who cry that it is racist have ZERO problem with alliances like the African union.
@@mazeemadaline3091 if they say that tell em why they don't have an trade agreement with the African countries and 85 percent of the population of Europe are white compare to 75 percent of this CANZUK union
The liberal jewish journalist is crying about the racist origins of canzuk means we definitely have to do it now lmao
Very sad to see TLDR use racism and ethnicity as a reason to be against the CANZUK agreement. I don't see how bringing four nations with shared values and yes a language more closely together is a bad thing. Also adding little things in the video like "Just reheated British Imperialism" 10:35 and "We don't like that" 5:30 when talking about "shared interest outlook and values" is unnecessary and divisive.
CANZUK is literally more diverse than europe when it comes to race.
Most of these are arguments against the EU, wich CANZUK would inevitably be compared to.