As a US citizen you can make $100k untaxed foreign invome yearly, and work in japan with a permanent resident pass, and visit most of the same countries. Thats the real move as it is worth 61% at current exchange rates
So basically Japan had ONLY _Jus sanguinis_ and family reunion, both requiring connection to an existing Japanese national, and did not allow naturalization by continous residence or _Jus soli_ , while now they do.
Civil servants in Japan have administrative law rights and knowledge of the Japan Constitution by agency authority. The abuse of the Civil Affairs Bureau, as question of inaction in documentation, is a conflict of law with foreign states and immigration law of Japan.
The question I always as foreigners who take up citizenship is "Would you fight for Japan if a war broke out?" - Never get an answer on this one! Its not just about the convenience is it!?
You have to give up your citizenship when naturalizing as Japanese. I'd say that's a strong statement, otherwise you could just stay as a PR and have 95% of the rights.
@@user-hs2hd7wp9gthis. PR lets u do all the same things except vote and run for office. 99% of people just want the non-suffrage related rights (stay in the country for as long as you like and come and go as u please [u can even leave for up to five years if u declare in advanced at the immigration office and up to one year just by checking a box on a form at the airport] , do any job or no job, borrow money at the local rates). They don’t care about being able to vote (LDP wins anyway so voting for or against them really makes no difference) and certainly don’t aim to become politicians
Check out our full interview with Jon, about why he became a Japanese politician: th-cam.com/video/xSVXPESERv4/w-d-xo.html
As a US citizen you can make $100k untaxed foreign invome yearly, and work in japan with a permanent resident pass, and visit most of the same countries. Thats the real move as it is worth 61% at current exchange rates
So basically Japan had ONLY _Jus sanguinis_ and family reunion, both requiring connection to an existing Japanese national, and did not allow naturalization by continous residence or _Jus soli_ , while now they do.
He mentioned that it is not only just sanguinis.
Need to resides snd pay tax for some years.
Many chinese adopted Japanese citizenship now.
We've had naturalized citizens serving in Japanese Parliament since the 1980s.
@@yo2trader539 Then the information provided in this video is incorrect.
Civil servants in Japan have administrative law rights and knowledge of the Japan Constitution by agency authority. The abuse of the Civil Affairs Bureau, as question of inaction in documentation, is a conflict of law with foreign states and immigration law of Japan.
This video would be a lot more helpful without the background music, as it does not enhance the video, it only detracts from it.
The question I always as foreigners who take up citizenship is "Would you fight for Japan if a war broke out?" - Never get an answer on this one! Its not just about the convenience is it!?
You have to give up your citizenship when naturalizing as Japanese. I'd say that's a strong statement, otherwise you could just stay as a PR and have 95% of the rights.
@@user-hs2hd7wp9gthis. PR lets u do all the same things except vote and run for office. 99% of people just want the non-suffrage related rights (stay in the country for as long as you like and come and go as u please [u can even leave for up to five years if u declare in advanced at the immigration office and up to one year just by checking a box on a form at the airport] , do any job or no job, borrow money at the local rates). They don’t care about being able to vote (LDP wins anyway so voting for or against them really makes no difference) and certainly don’t aim to become politicians
Any question of law under domestic policies of Japan involve having a Japan passport legal right.