@@cwstewartjr1973 how long did it take to land in the original video? and how long did it take to land here on earth? you tell us then, since you seem to know more. Why question instead of telling
@@theunknown9437 Hard to take you seriously, when you lack the ability to spell a common word. It is better to be pissed off, than to be pissed on. Checkmate.
The problem with the lunar dust is that it follows you in the module or capsule's atmosphere... where you have to breathe and blink your eyes: it follows you in every orifice. The moon dust is also extremely sharp and "sticky" as a velcro.
It’s like the guy who thought he proved the earth was flat by taking a level on an airplane and showing that the bubble is still between the two lines.
Well in reality the video It is not quite correct, you see when you work with air conditioner, a mini split and you want a vacuum free of humidity. You have to keep a vacuum at least for half of hour, forty minutes, you have to use a digital vacuometer and in the video the guy put in his "vacuum chamber" (you don't really know if it's sealed) and turned the vacuum just for a seconds...... it's not that easy to clean the system from humidity, so the result is not conclusive
And you can't even fix these people because everything you tell them is "a lie" and, even though they can't prove anything themselves, they want tou to prove what's already being proven over the internet in 10 seconds.
I wonder what made those conspiracy theorists come up with that logic that the dust wouldn't move without an atmosphere... If anything, with a less dense/rarer atmosphere or a vacuum, things displaced should actually move further....
Like someone pointed out in below comments: In High school physics, simple problems like studying the trajectory and velocity of a projectile, free fall, etc., the questions usually ask you to neglect air resistance. Because taking it into consideration needlessly complicates high school physics. We can automatically assume, projectiles act and behave in vacuum almost identical to how they act on our world.
I like how people who didn’t even take high school physics feel that they are qualified to criticize and theorize about something that directly needs physics to know.
@@ioncekilledamanwithmyshoe To alot of people, things that require studying, replicable results through experiments, and peer reviewed certification are part of a giant conspiracy.
It will actually work more better in vacuum of space because of no air resistance or gravity! , and on different planets gravity will affect differently but most still be better than earth
It's remarkable how little people know about. I heard adults arguing about how much faster could a helicopter lift off the Moon because it's smaller. Boy, that was fun explaining. I don't think they ever understood me about no air.
Even if there was zero gravity (which I know there is gravity on the moon), the kinetic energy of the kick would be enough to send shit into space and go until stopped
the dust getting kicked up doesn't have to do with gravity, but with transfer of momentum. if you knock a thing against a thing, it'll still move in low/null gravity. in fact, it'll move more.
The air is not moving all the dust and sand in a storm. They are, literally, bouncing off each other after moved. For every action there is a reaction. It is simply a transfer of energy.
Nevermind the phuckin dust or a vacuum shoe print. How tha phuck can you go from your knees 2 popping straight up, without a phuckin wire? gravity or not, just look @ em, hop along Cassidy
Hahahaha “Remind me to dust my camera too, will ya?” Immediately after, “Don’t forget to dust your camera…” I love how they can still joke around in situations as serious as this.
You can find on YT longer videos of them doing funny stuff. Playing with a ball, throwing tools, jumping up and down(which almost caused him to rip his suit.... and die)
I don't understand, what do they think would happen to the dust because there's no air? Do they think it would stay stuck to the moon ground? Wouldn't that just be caused by the type of surface and nothing to do with if there is air or not?
wait... Flat Earth supports Fake Moon-landing because rockets cant orbit a fucking disk Which makes Globe Earth better because Moon-landings are definitely real
I believe the only reason for dust to not fly around is to have the gravity of the moon makes them so heavy so they won't fly around. But I also believe that moon's gravity to be around 1/6th only sooo
“Remind me to dust my camera will ya?” *immediately after * “Don’t forget to dust your camera” That cheeky bastard. Good to see they were having fun out there
Ever heard of radio communication? You should look it up and educate yourself. By the way, Nixon's phone call was to Mission Control in Houston and routed through the radio communication with the astronauts. It's mind boggling how many people think he called the astronauts directly. They're the type of people who don't know what radio communication is.
@@SalSagev-n3sthey didn't even wait long enough to answer at times to pretend the signal is traveling a certain length of time. They've tried to do it mostly but some questions have been answered too fast. And the faces on them. Never seen such unhappy faces of people after a so called big achievement. I wouldn't laugh if I knew I had to tell the world one of the biggest lies in the world and keep it a secret until I die.
@@ollymounara605 There were SIX moon landings. Twelve men have walked on the moon. Go look at the pictures taken from lunar orbit of the six landing sites showing equipment and rover tracks. Then look up "Third Party Evidence for Apollo Moon Landings" and read the confirmations from numerous other countries and scientists throughout the world.
Fun fact: moon dust is also razor sharp since there’s nothing to erode it. It’s also very electrostatic, or it can cling really easily. There have even been cases of the dust ripping through four layers of Kevlar in an astronauts boot.
This@@robertwalker7010 guy is going around this channel's videos and saying everything is fake lol. Seriously stop believing everything you saw on Facebook dude.
The dust probably flies further and faster as there's no air resistance, although the smaller particles would've benefitted from being suspended in the air for some time. We see dust fly up and out quickly and drop quickly so it literally does look like dust in a vacuum..
The dust obviously can fly up if kicked on the on the moon, however it will fall much slower [specially fine dust] because of something called gravity which is much less than the earths. This is the same except the video is slowed down...
@@googlesucks100ballsandshaf6hmm.. I'm not sure if this reply is meant for me as it doesn't seem relevant but as you have my attention "something called gravity" doesn't work like that. In a vacuum (moon) e"specially fine dust" will fall at the same speed as larger dust. However, it may appear to land later because it has gone higher than larger debris (transfer of kinetic energy from boot to dust). On Earth fine dust stays in the air because, well because it's suspended in the air. If Earth were a vacuum, yes it would pull stuff down quicker (and not let it fly so high in the first place) vs the moon but it's not going to compare to dust suspended in a gaseous environment
@@Itsgyro possibly but they mentioned 'especially fine dust' falling slower due to 'something called gravity'. Seemed like they were giving a snarky lesson on gravity but messed it up lol
@@mixerfistit5522 it’s not a vacuum tho it’s an atmosphere and the moon has an atmosphere of itself just somewhat weak so it won’t have as much of an effect against it as a vacuum does
Made in a Hollywood basement, the year was 1969 what number of evil is in that? It’s so obvious that was his big move to lead you guys away from the sacred book, ITS FAKE THATS WHY WE CANT GO BACK AND EVERY SINGLE ROCKET DOSENT LEAVE THE ATMOSPHERE
@@rhozq Gravity (from Latin gravitas 'weight'[1]), or gravitation, is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass or energy, including planets, stars, galaxies and even light,[2] are attracted to (or gravitate toward) one another. On Earth, gravity gives weight to physical objects, and the Moon's gravity causes the tides of the oceans. The gravitational attraction of the original gaseous matter present in the Universe caused it to begin coalescing and forming stars and caused the stars to group together into galaxies, so gravity is responsible for many of the large-scale structures in the Universe. Gravity has an infinite range, although its effects become weaker as objects get farther away.
@@cappiece3786 yes they did. People who dont believe in the moon landing are the same people who will argue with you over anything. They will continue to deny and move the goal posts to suit their argument and will never give up.
Why is no one talking about the god tier dad jokes being told on a multibillion dollar government operation? “Remind me to dust my camera too, will ya?” “Don’t forget to dust your camera”
@@The_Old_War_Elephant they can do it every time they want to, but there is not point. And also did you know the budget of NASA was much much more in 1969 than now? Do your research before talking about a topic that you don't know about.
@@nicholasdriver8253 it's not theoretical, if you take off your helmet in space, you will die due to all of the moisture in your body being sucked out in a few short seconds. But yeah man, guess I'm just wrong for actually learning.
Gravity is the reason why the dust particles travel back down to the surface of the moon after the astronaut’s kick imparted upward momentum onto them; it has nothing to do with the ambient pressure (I.e., presence of air) conditions
Astronauts = Objects likewise Sand particles also = objects If astronauts can movie and jump in no air So does sand particles Astronauts = Sand particles = Can move
Also our bodies need air around us... Not just to breathe but more importantly we need the air pressure all around us, or our hearts can't pump blood to our brains. All of outer space is fake.
I like that some people think a vacuum exerts some kind of force that prevents things from moving. They seem to think it's only the presence of something like air getting in the way of an object that allows the object to move... It makes my head hurt trying to figure out how someone could come to that conclusion.
I don't know exactly where this is coming from but you guys got this totally wrong... Here's from a real scientist... Dust in vacuum do not form cloud dust when tossed around and without moisture it will not stick to any surface... In fact moat of you would be amazed at how dust behaves in vacuum. In fact I guarantee that if the film was real there would be hundreds of scientist just trying to explain how this cloud dust form. You'd be amazed
@@vintage8818 well I just busted you right there buddy if it's 1/6 of Earth gravity then it would take 1/6 of the fuel that it took to put that rocket into outer space and I didn't see any silos on the moon lander.
I wonder if conspiracy theorists understand that vacuum is the most ideal condition to get particles to fly around the way you expect/calculate them to…
@@yoyo-co3tx That’s an age old flat Earth trope that proves whoever asked it hasn’t got the first clue how gravity works! On Earth It’s GRAVITY that’s the container!
@@terrypussypower haha i dont think they believe in gravity. apparently the flat earth moves upwards infinitely, so when you jump the earth is going up and meeting you.
another thing people do is only watch the first landing but they never watch the videos of the last landings...the later missions went way longer on the surface and did way more stuff and no film can duplicate at the time not even close
@@JohnSmith-pj6wb Let's make something clear. Humans have never been anywhere near the moon. It didn't happen then, and it still hasn't happened. Unless you believe deadly radiation and extreme flight conditions to the human body are not real.
The ironic thing is the flying dust is proof of vacuum. If there were air (say, on a film set) the dust would billow and churn as a cloud like we’re used to seeing, but in vacuum the tiny dust particles fly without resistance like individual ball bearings.
Great point. Here it swirls around on itself. And there it just went straight lines. I feel dumb for not having already been using this in my arguments/discussions. 🙃
@@UsernamesHandle an energy:fuel ratio we need another source of fuel that lasts longer and much better alloys that are lighter than current rockets and possibly years on a journey to reach the moon, the moon isn’t as close as you think it is.
Bruh, them saying you can't make a print because there's no moisture to lock the particles together. It's like saying the moon shouldn't be a planet because it doesn't have moist air to hold its mass together
@@moshunit96 I think he meant planet as in “planetary body” which large moons and asteroids meet the criteria for. Not ‘planet’ in the sense that it is a secondary body to a star.
@@dadrocha7741 Try to think for a minute... how much do you know that isn't the result of someone telling you it's fact? How much do you know that if called upon to do so could you demonstrate as fact? (And you have!) Otherwise, you have what's termed a faith-based outlook on life. You're trusting that others aren't lying to you... and one look at the social construct of our society demonstrates quite clearly that people in general are quite disingenuous and/or agenda driven.
@@DR3WSAL3M Did you never take high school physics? How often did they say, "Ignoring air resistance" to make it easier? Did you ever take undergrad college / university physics where they had uniform values for air resistance? I hope you're just trolling and not expecting your ignorance to be an argument.
Keep in mind that the numbers that you have mentioned are meaningless as you have not indicated what units you are talking about. Also keep in mind that all the lunar landings took place early in the lunar day when the temperatures were mid range. Take care.
I love how he falls. He is trying to maintain balance whilst bouncing in low G. He ends up shifting too far right and tries to re-correct but he is in that giant dumb space suit lol. So he tumbles to the ground looking like a baby learning to walk. Absolutely love it. I wanna go to the Moon!
This was actually when that astronaut almost died. The equipment on their back are very heavy and a fall like that could potentially A) break your bones, B) damage a pipe in life support system on your back and you'll have seconds to return to the shuttle. And no, 1/6th gravity doesn't help 'soften' the fall because a 350lb man crashing into a wall on earth is the same thing on the moon. You'll fall slower but the momentum is still carried.
Love how the same conspiracy asks "how can dust move around in that environment" and also "how can dust stay still in that environment" at the same time
They're not trying to make sense. They're trying to make dissention. Because we're still one of the greatest nations on earth and they still don't like that.
@@eliyarrows2456uhhh......"...a guy gets covered in dude..." I think you're watching an entirely different kind of video lol. Sorry, I understand it was a typo but apparently my wife is correct and I have the sense of humor of a 12 yr old.
Thing is, if they were given legitimate answers instead of being mocked for refusing to believe something like the moon landing, they would probably move on instead of coming up with more abd more why's.
@@Henry_III Fr though like things move in space, I'm not sure of you've seen this video but it was about the astronauts putting down the flag and saying it shouldn't be moving because their isn't any air.
I don’t understand how ppl still think this is REAL FOOTAGE FROM THE MOON like you’re saying they were live-streaming in that year? And they had perfect reception with the astronauts? People that can’t see the bigger picture will always stay blind.
Yikes people are dumb, the dirt that gets kicked up falls back down to the ground just like the guy does when he jumps, the moon has gravity just less than earth.
@F Pedojoe sure then why do you believe such silly bullshit. I think you're lying and are definitely a qanon. Especially when you refuse to believe facts. You people whom think science is something to choose to believe in or not believe in are on such another level of stupidity, the word retard isn't even harsh enough.
The footprint on the moon does not match the bottom of the shoes that the Smithsonian institute has of Neil Armstrong's space suit. Explain that for me please.
Mythbusters did this YEARS ago! And proved it to be true that Yes, you can make a footprint in a vacuum and Yes, dust will be kicked up without the presence of air.
@@larryjones4045 I hate to break it to you, but no one will ever be able to prove enough to convince you of something you don’t want to be convinced of.
@@larryjones4045 the rocket probebly blew all the loose dust away and since there is no moisture, there is no way for the capsule to be covered as if it were mud
also the fact that it would be more difficult to fake than to actually do in 1969. you could probebly make something believable today with CGI. but back then the computing technology was basically non existant.
“How is there dust flying around if there isn’t any wind?” when you kick something, it moves, and then falls down if it’s close to a moon or similar being crazy, isn’t it
@@emilyservice4670 if there was no gravity on the moon, the astronauts wouldn't be able to land. And if they did somehow land and got out, once they hopped, they'd just be floating back into space until something stopped them
@vibovitold unfortunately they did. The Moon dust was thrown up onto their suits while walking around (as you can see in the video). It tended to cling to the surface of the suit, not least because it's very easy to build up an electrostatic charge between the dust and suit on the moon surface. So, they ended up bringing dust into the lunar lander, which they would then breathe in eventually, leading to lung irritation for example.
@@JeagerTv Even if you're implying that gravitational attraction is somehow impeding free movement, general relativity tells us these objects are in fact moving in straight lines, its spacetime which is warped.
No need of air to fly, if you put enough strenght anything will fly away... no need of moisture to leave a trace, you can leave a footprint in an all dry desert, moon ground is like powder, weight compress it and you have a footprint, no need of moisture...
Kicking dust around doesn’t require anything other than the dust and whatever is doing the kicking… Some people are really built different… to bad they can’t be sent back to the manufacturer.
Yup, you should look in the mirror as a prime example your inane comment. The guy in the video is misrepresenting the arguments. He's "debunking" arguments, that no one is making. The argument about the dust, is about how low the dust is flying, almost exactly how it would on earth, even though the gravity on the moon is 1/8th the earth's gravity. It's actually more about the rover footage, than it is the astronauts kicking it. I have never heard anyone make the argument that you cant make a footprint in dry dirt, in a vacuum.. This guy is misrepresenting people, to make them look stupid. Which is stupid in and of itself. He's a dishonest presenter, and you just ate it up, without checking to see if the assertions he is making are even real. Yes, most people are stupid. Also, most stupid people do not know they are also in the stupid camp. Dunning-Kruger manifest.....
@@carllennen3520 Exactly my kind of irony to have someone talking about Dunning- Kruger, while in the same comment questioning if the moon landings were real
@@carllennen3520 if he’s going out of his way to make those people look stupid it’s because it’s so easy to do it’s barely an inconvenience. Kinda like putting trash in a bin your standing beside instead of just dropping it to the floor. It’s also just the decent thing to do, also a lot like that. Just because you’ve never seen or heard something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. I HAVE heard the footprint argument. Its a common enough argument MythBusters did an episode debunking it. The moon has 1/6G, not 1/8. That’s approximately a 20% difference, off the top of my head, it IS significant. What do you expect the dust to do, spiral off into space? It goes up, it’s comes back down in a parabola. I don’t know if you’ve ever SEEN dust kicked up on Earth but it doesn’t do that. Yes. These people are fucking stupid. And I’m tired of pretending they aren’t to preserve their feelings. Just like I’m tired of pretending to respect their opinions as if they were valid when those opinions are “vaccines have microchips, the earth is flat, Trump won 2020 and 2+2=5.” Pineapple shouldn’t be on pizza is a valid opinion. I disagree, but it’s valid. Claiming that water is actually dry and wetness is a government conspiracy makes you an imbecile, a lunatic or just ignorant, and the last one only applies to people willing to let that shit go in the face of a preponderance of evidence.
Funny thing, the way the dust moves is actually impossible in air, you'd see a lot more dust clouds and it would take a while to settle, the moon dust just falls immediately and never makes any clouds
“People say if there is no dust on the moon then how is the dust flying around?” The same reason the guy is moving around. Just because there is no air Doesn’t mean things can’t move. Without gravity the dirt and dust will move a lot easier too.
@@T1000.Android because it's being fired in a vacuum, the gas quickly expands after leaving the nozzle. So there isn't much gas to push the dust around as much as you would expect. Here on earth the impact you see on objects from rockets or jets is because the exhaust stream is transferring its energy to the ambient air. But the energy cant spread out because the exhaust is a lower pressure than the surrounding air resulting in a localized high speed stream of air where you have a large amount of energy in a small area. While the exhaust pressure has no counteracting force In the vacuum of space so it spreads out to be at equilibrium. Resulting in less energy over a larger area. Also the rocket on the decent stage of the apollo lander is designed to be most efficient in a vacuum and isnt that powerful relative to some of the jet and rocket engines we use here on earth
And they will try and argue “but it’s zero gravity! Why doesn’t it just float” and then I realize I’m talking to a stupid person and end the conversation
The 1/3 pounder failed at McDonalds because the masses thought it was smaller than a quarter pounder. You just can’t argue with folks, they’ll bring you down to their level and win.
I saw a comment on an entirely different video the other day where someine said their manager asked how much of a job they'd got done. The worker said "A third". The manager said "Everyone else I've asked has done a quarter. You'd better work faster."
Buzz Aldrin already said it never happened. Then nasa "loses" the tech to go back. You're a muppet. Humans will rot and go extinct on earth. We haven't and never will leave the outermost atmosphere. They go to the ISS practically in street clothes now. Not space. Still in the outer ring of the stratosphere. Van Allen radiation plus the fact that America nukes everything make it impossible to leave.
The dust will fly around, but will drop like a stone once its initial velocity is overcome by gravity. In atmosphere, the smaller particles will suspend in the air, and eventually settle.
Disturbing soil will make particles move around. Just because there is no air, the Moon does have some gravity. That is what attracts the kicked up dust to fall back to the ground, and keeps the astronauts from just floating off the Moon.
@@T1000.Android The lunar lander used its descent thrusters to slow the vehicle down to a rate where it was barely moving when it touched down and hardly disturbed the surface of the moon. In fact Armstrong kicked up more dust jumping off the ladder to the ground.
Off the bat it makes perfect sense that youd be able to make a footprint in a vacuum. Sure theres no moisture in the air to lock the particles together, but at the same time theres no wind to mess with the print. The footprint is literally in a vacuum, itll be fine.
What does no air have to do with the fact that they’re physically moving the dust? Obviously something won’t move on its own the laws of motion still apply in space.
@@jackieburkhart3268 they aren't theories, they are making hypotheses. But yeah, this guy just has a good, solid understanding of the fundamentals of science, and goes from there. That's the one thing all of the people who make up nonsensical ideas have in common. Absolutely no concept of scientific fundamentals. It literally changes the course of a humans entire life and the way they process everything in life for the better if a person has that down. Without it, you're entire existence may as well be halved in value when compared to someone with scientific literacy, and will almost certainly start off their own children for a life of failure as well.
One would think the thrusters of a landing engine would do at least a small change in the surface, maybe a little dust kicked out of the way, but it seems this module was carefully placed there. Maybe by God, lmao.
@@edguitarstanleyeisen6179 in the landing clip from the capsule cam there is debris while landing, cut to next Sean,, no creator, not even dust on that landing pads
True. You can spoon feed them irrefutable evidence of the six landings and they'll claim pictures of landing sites are fake, other countries and global scientists are lying, and 400,000 people involved with the Apollo program have managed to keep a secret for 50 years. By the way, their lame response to the last point is "compartmentalization".
It's almost like when one thing hits another thing it moves ... incredible
Exactly. Then how exactly does sound propagates in vaccum like in those nasa videos? I've been asking this repeatedly and yet no satisfying answer
@@barryallen8307 example of vids i also wanna see?
@@barryallen8307 What sounds exactly?
@@barryallen8307 what sounds?
@@barryallen8307 can you please show an example? Because all you can hear is the radios going off, which are inside the helmet
If you give the particles momentum, they can move even without air to blow them.
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l your joking right?
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l Karen a simple google search would prove otherwise
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l That is because they wore secondary boots over the flat sole shoes on the suit when outside the lander.
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l uh... literally your "argument" can be proven wrong with a quick Google search
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l it’s called Google. Use it before making stupid comments
"Remind me to dust my camera, will ya?"
*two seconds later*
"Don't forget to dust your camera"
Love that.
Ive heard a lot of moon landing conspiracies. Never these ones. Shillery.
Not gonna lie whenever I say “Remind me to ___” I always forget the immediate moment after.
My boyfriend does that 😂
@@revalfresh Hoaxers aren't all the same? Ya don't say...
Haha, i always do that when someone ask me to remind them about/to do something, because i know ill forget it faster than they do.
if you look closely there is no dust flying around, it gets kicked up but quickly falls back to the surface
Correct. Exactly as it should do in a vacuum. Take care.
Exactly as it would do in gravity
Because there's gravity on the moon? 1.62 meters/second? I think?
@@pix-can-fix643 Correct, 1.6 m/s/s or 1.6 m/s2.
The dust on the moon doesn't look like the dust in this video. Moon dust looks like shards of glass. December 25, 2024.
That dust one is stupid, because they are completely forgetting that things still have inertia in a vacuum
Can you expect less from some people that don't believe in science '-')
@@kazukishinomiya9424 yeah they dont even believe in gravity, let alone inertia
well said
So explain how does the dust fall back to the surface so fast in 1/6th the gravity of earth?
@@cwstewartjr1973 how long did it take to land in the original video? and how long did it take to land here on earth? you tell us then, since you seem to know more. Why question instead of telling
If anyone over the age of ten believes that dust can only move with air, I’m saddened
Our former President thought windmills cause cancer. People use their mouths before they use their brains.
@@BjManberries piss off mate, like the currant potato uses anything.
@@theunknown9437 Hard to take you seriously, when you lack the ability to spell a common word. It is better to be pissed off, than to be pissed on. Checkmate.
@@BjManberries it’s hard to take you seriously when your argument is picking on spelling words.
@@theunknown9437 they didn't mention anything about Joe biden but you just assumed he was a biden supporter
Everyone who takes a physics paper knows why things can fly up and down in a vacuum:
"Assume air resistance is negligible."
High school science has a unique fan base 😅😅😅... especially in China , India ...Asian countries per se
How do you take a physics paper?
How do you take a physics paper?
Exactly
@@ranchenthusiast5323 with your hands.
The problem with the lunar dust is that it follows you in the module or capsule's atmosphere... where you have to breathe and blink your eyes: it follows you in every orifice. The moon dust is also extremely sharp and "sticky" as a velcro.
The dust on the moon doesn't look like the dust in this video. Moon dust looks like shards of glass. December 25, 2024.
That footprint was made in clay on earth.
@@eugene7518it seems wet sand.
@ciuzdamm at some point the astronauts have to CHANGE THEIR DIAPERS. January 11, 2025
"If there's no air, how is the dust flying around?"
Because... they kicked it?
obviously 😊🤗
It’s like the guy who thought he proved the earth was flat by taking a level on an airplane and showing that the bubble is still between the two lines.
People are just plain dumb.
HoW DiD tHeY KiCk It iF ThErE iS nO AiR oN tHe MoOn
If moon landing was success, why no more astronaut go there? Our tech is far beyond already now.. the probability must be increased
Imagine making an argument that dirt shouldn't move after being kicked
@@dtvivoAin't nobody gonna find your messages... just type it here
That's how stupid flat-earthers are.
@@dtvivo dafuq lmfao
Well in reality the video It is not quite correct, you see when you work with air conditioner, a mini split and you want a vacuum free of humidity. You have to keep a vacuum at least for half of hour, forty minutes, you have to use a digital vacuometer and in the video the guy put in his "vacuum chamber" (you don't really know if it's sealed) and turned the vacuum just for a seconds...... it's not that easy to clean the system from humidity, so the result is not conclusive
@@dtvivo The Earth is round, bozo.
By their logic, you shouldn't be able to move in space at all. Why is dust any different than the astronaut?
Yeah, and it’s a whole lot lighter than a whole ass person so if a human moves-
Well I mean 90% of them don’t even believe in space so what do you expect from people like them
And you can't even fix these people because everything you tell them is "a lie" and, even though they can't prove anything themselves, they want tou to prove what's already being proven over the internet in 10 seconds.
DUH 🙄 the astronauts are alive and the dust isn’t!
This is a joke
😅 good logic lad
I wonder what made those conspiracy theorists come up with that logic that the dust wouldn't move without an atmosphere... If anything, with a less dense/rarer atmosphere or a vacuum, things displaced should actually move further....
People really thinking air is the magical substance that enables basic physics.
Until the 1800's we thought it was a good idea to cut people and bleed them out to heal them.
Stupidity knows no bounds.
Ya its more like a factor that can influence energy.
Those ppl are clearly dumb.
it makes physics harder 😭
They think air makes the world go round.
Like someone pointed out in below comments:
In High school physics, simple problems like studying the trajectory and velocity of a projectile, free fall, etc., the questions usually ask you to neglect air resistance. Because taking it into consideration needlessly complicates high school physics. We can automatically assume, projectiles act and behave in vacuum almost identical to how they act on our world.
I like how people who didn’t even take high school physics feel that they are qualified to criticize and theorize about something that directly needs physics to know.
@@ioncekilledamanwithmyshoe To alot of people, things that require studying, replicable results through experiments, and peer reviewed certification are part of a giant conspiracy.
It will actually work more better in vacuum of space because of no air resistance or gravity! , and on different planets gravity will affect differently but most still be better than earth
So is the vacuum not part of the “real” world?
@@xirochamber5863 Yes vacuum is not real. It can't hurt you. Ether fills everything.
The gravity is less, but it's still there. You don't need air for particles to go up when kicked, then go back down after a few seconds.
Ye
Thata what i though, me, a 16 yo.
It's remarkable how little people know about. I heard adults arguing about how much faster could a helicopter lift off the Moon because it's smaller. Boy, that was fun explaining. I don't think they ever understood me about no air.
Even if there was zero gravity (which I know there is gravity on the moon), the kinetic energy of the kick would be enough to send shit into space and go until stopped
@@-Gax- literally 35% gravity on moon sooooo, ye, that's real, the dust falling back to moon
I don't even understand why people would make this objection. It's easier for dust to fly in a vacuum, because there is less drag.
The dust falling and moving could be easily proven with free falling honestly. Things still fall when there is no air because gravity still exist.
Actually.......
Never gonna give you up, never gonna say goodbye...... Never gonna run around and Desert you.
@@angeliscassidys this is not an actual rickroll because u will need like a sentence that will end with never or smth
@@stick1384 you just mad you clicked read more 💀
@@TheBehemoth1984 you have a point LMAO i'm so pissed because i got rickrolled so many times that day
the dust getting kicked up doesn't have to do with gravity, but with transfer of momentum. if you knock a thing against a thing, it'll still move in low/null gravity. in fact, it'll move more.
"if there is no air on the moon, how are the dust flying?"
I lost braincells
Gravity
Yeah that was strange
@@jewelbarnett2077 Yup. And you can see how slow it falls.
I think it's the spend it goes down
momentum
The air is not moving all the dust and sand in a storm. They are, literally, bouncing off each other after moved. For every action there is a reaction. It is simply a transfer of energy.
Yea, wtf is wrong with people, he literally kicking the dust in the video?
Thank you! I don't even know how this is an issue for anyone to understand.
Was dust supposed to fall down much slower due to lower gravity?
Right.
Nevermind the phuckin dust or a vacuum shoe print. How tha phuck can you go from your knees 2 popping straight up, without a phuckin wire? gravity or not, just look @ em, hop along Cassidy
This is already so much more experimentation than someone who denies the moon landing would do.
Imagine thinking air is the only place that physics can work lol 🗿
Karen-science.
lol
@@wasifiqbal9984 yup
Wait I'll make another sentence
Imagine thinking earth is a flat object in the ss when it's neighbours are round🗿
Not as good as yours but I tried
Imagine thinking you know everything lol
Hahahaha “Remind me to dust my camera too, will ya?” Immediately after, “Don’t forget to dust your camera…” I love how they can still joke around in situations as serious as this.
You can find on YT longer videos of them doing funny stuff. Playing with a ball, throwing tools, jumping up and down(which almost caused him to rip his suit.... and die)
@@cookiesnruntz Omg😂 thanks!
They're on the moon! How could they be anything but jolly?
I remembered the oat meal conversation they had too
@@vikingursigurdsson except none of that actually factually happened on the moon. None, its all hollywood basement
I'm an idiot most times, but even I have the basic knowledge that shit will move if moved
Dude I love it … right? Just left a comment about who is so dumb enough??? I’m serious I wonder who is saying these things what generation is it.
@@tootsitroll9785 old people
@@adrianolimaco8500 🤣🤣🤣
I don't understand, what do they think would happen to the dust because there's no air? Do they think it would stay stuck to the moon ground? Wouldn't that just be caused by the type of surface and nothing to do with if there is air or not?
@@prayingmantis8148 It's not the type of surface, it's just gravity. Even in vacuum and low gravity dust is still going to fall.
Wait… So you’re telling me an object in motion tends to stay in motion?!?
“How can particles fly around in a vacuum?” They asked, while sitting on a rock hurtling through space
Big brain
They are flatearthers
wait...
Flat Earth supports Fake Moon-landing because rockets cant orbit a fucking disk
Which makes Globe Earth better because Moon-landings are definitely real
@@Project_VideoGame Ignoring Flat Earth theory. NASA themselves say They can’t pass low earth orbit. Also NASA was created by former Nazis.
@@RagingBullNuts there is no such thing as the flat earth theory.
What's puzzling me is why is that even an argument? Why would the dust NOT fly around? What's the idea? What's the reasoning behind such thoughts?
Same I was scratching my head thinking "what would you expect to happen exactly?"
I've never heard anyone ever talk about that, they've always said how does the moon dust act in the same gravitational equivalence as in earth.
I believe the only reason for dust to not fly around is to have the gravity of the moon makes them so heavy so they won't fly around. But I also believe that moon's gravity to be around 1/6th only sooo
@@mediaisthevirus But it doesn't. They're flying significantly higher than on Earth and fall significantly lower. And very visibly so.
@@pasijutaulietuviuesas9174 are your eyes broken? It acts exactly like the fine particulate dust in deserts here on earth
In fact, air makes stuff flying around harder to happen since it adds resistance
This was my 1st thought, actually 🙂
@@mohsindalvi87I want to replicate that 'experiment', this guy says, proving the moon landing was all a controlled experiment. Got caught out!
The dust on the moon doesn't look like the dust in this video. Moon dust looks like shards of glass. December 25, 2024....
That footprint made with clay on earth
It's not the vacuum that people had a question about. It's the fact that the dust falls so quickly when the gravity is much less.
Do people not realise that air contains stuff?
Zero atmospheric resistance.
"Just because there is not air, doesn't mean physics stops existing"
Wouldn’t the physics change with a different center of gravity? 🤔
@@Stayjolly33 yeah it makes you look like you're suspended by wires when you trip and fall face first but don't hit the ground lol
@@TrillMurraytheir are reflectors on the moon they left with the right equipment you can see them, please just raw dog it and talk about the jew
It’s fake
@@TrillMurray hmm 🤔
If there’s no gravity on the moon, how come the shadows of the astronauts didn’t fly away?
You're onto something!
my god…
EXPOSED...
Because no air.
just out of curiosity, where is your current location? I'm not the CIA, you can trust me
“Remind me to dust my camera will ya?”
*immediately after *
“Don’t forget to dust your camera”
That cheeky bastard. Good to see they were having fun out there
1st comment
Why copy other popular comments?
@@burakkaya9149 I didn’t even look at the other comments before I posted this, maybe just a lot of people thinking the same thing?
@@zooby11isbambam repost is repost. That doesn't change anything.
@@burakkaya9149 wdym repost lol? He literally said he didn't look at other comments and posted his own immediately after watching the video...
No no no, how were they communicating from earth to the moon when my cell phone don't work in my house without wifi.... go ahead I'll wait....
Ever heard of radio communication? You should look it up and educate yourself.
By the way, Nixon's phone call was to Mission Control in Houston and routed through the radio communication with the astronauts. It's mind boggling how many people think he called the astronauts directly. They're the type of people who don't know what radio communication is.
You do realise that they were not using cell phones or wifi? Seriously, at least do a little bit of research. Take care.
@@SalSagev-n3sthey didn't even wait long enough to answer at times to pretend the signal is traveling a certain length of time.
They've tried to do it mostly but some questions have been answered too fast.
And the faces on them. Never seen such unhappy faces of people after a so called big achievement. I wouldn't laugh if I knew I had to tell the world one of the biggest lies in the world and keep it a secret until I die.
@@ollymounara605 There were SIX moon landings. Twelve men have walked on the moon. Go look at the pictures taken from lunar orbit of the six landing sites showing equipment and rover tracks. Then look up "Third Party Evidence for Apollo Moon Landings" and read the confirmations from numerous other countries and scientists throughout the world.
Fun fact: moon dust is also razor sharp since there’s nothing to erode it. It’s also very electrostatic, or it can cling really easily. There have even been cases of the dust ripping through four layers of Kevlar in an astronauts boot.
Source? Sounds terrifying
Ohh so that’s why they wear suits on the moon (Joke)
Pocket sand just got more fun
It's only Dust because it's shards of rock pulverized by impacts!
I learned that from Lemmino
I love how no matter what, people will never be 100% professional. These guys are making history and still have time to make jokes. It's hilarious.
It’s human and it’s refreshing.
Faked. Fool.
@@robertwalker7010 Mhm yeah okay
This@@robertwalker7010 guy is going around this channel's videos and saying everything is fake lol. Seriously stop believing everything you saw on Facebook dude.
@@robertwalker7010How ignorant do you have to be to think that this whole thing was faked?
The dust probably flies further and faster as there's no air resistance, although the smaller particles would've benefitted from being suspended in the air for some time.
We see dust fly up and out quickly and drop quickly so it literally does look like dust in a vacuum..
The dust obviously can fly up if kicked on the on the moon, however it will fall much slower [specially fine dust] because of something called gravity which is much less than the earths. This is the same except the video is slowed down...
@@googlesucks100ballsandshaf6hmm.. I'm not sure if this reply is meant for me as it doesn't seem relevant but as you have my attention "something called gravity" doesn't work like that. In a vacuum (moon) e"specially fine dust" will fall at the same speed as larger dust. However, it may appear to land later because it has gone higher than larger debris (transfer of kinetic energy from boot to dust).
On Earth fine dust stays in the air because, well because it's suspended in the air.
If Earth were a vacuum, yes it would pull stuff down quicker (and not let it fly so high in the first place) vs the moon but it's not going to compare to dust suspended in a gaseous environment
@@mixerfistit5522 he is probably saying that it will fall much slower in comparison to earth as moon has 6 times less g (1.667 m/s^2 i believe).
@@Itsgyro possibly but they mentioned 'especially fine dust' falling slower due to 'something called gravity'. Seemed like they were giving a snarky lesson on gravity but messed it up lol
@@mixerfistit5522 it’s not a vacuum tho it’s an atmosphere and the moon has an atmosphere of itself just somewhat weak so it won’t have as much of an effect against it as a vacuum does
Thank you for the demonstration - really cool 👌
To make the moon landing more believable they filmed it on the moon. Truly committed to the bit.
😂
I love NDT because of this joke.
Perfect
Made in a Hollywood basement, the year was 1969 what number of evil is in that? It’s so obvious that was his big move to lead you guys away from the sacred book, ITS FAKE THATS WHY WE CANT GO BACK AND EVERY SINGLE ROCKET DOSENT LEAVE THE ATMOSPHERE
😂😂😂duhhh
“Remind me to dust my camera too”
“Don’t forget to dust your camera”
peak comedy
His comedy is out of this world.
Big Norm Macdonald energy
definitely best friends
@@necromancer6405 lol
Lol
It's no benefit to argue with people who think gravity is due to atmospheric pressure.
So what is gravity
@@rhozq Gravity (from Latin gravitas 'weight'[1]), or gravitation, is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass or energy, including planets, stars, galaxies and even light,[2] are attracted to (or gravitate toward) one another. On Earth, gravity gives weight to physical objects, and the Moon's gravity causes the tides of the oceans. The gravitational attraction of the original gaseous matter present in the Universe caused it to begin coalescing and forming stars and caused the stars to group together into galaxies, so gravity is responsible for many of the large-scale structures in the Universe. Gravity has an infinite range, although its effects become weaker as objects get farther away.
@@rhozq the thing that one smart dude invented
your pfp definitely checks out on what you think, you think high enough about yourself that informing and teaching people about what they dont know
@@chmleon he does look like a teacher huh
“Footprints are impossible because they need moisture to form” bro what law of physics says a *shape* needs to be wet in order to exist
I can't even imagine how amazing it would be to be walking on the moon. It'd be so surreal.
yeah!! imagine seeing Earth from there!!
Sorry but space is fake.
But did they 😊
@@cappiece3786 yes they did. People who dont believe in the moon landing are the same people who will argue with you over anything. They will continue to deny and move the goal posts to suit their argument and will never give up.
@@cappiece3786 they did
Why is no one talking about the god tier dad jokes being told on a multibillion dollar government operation?
“Remind me to dust my camera too, will ya?”
“Don’t forget to dust your camera”
The real chads
I didn't get the joke, explain plz
Nevermind I got it, he reminded him instantly lol
@@YounesLayachi damn that really took you a while to understand
@@OneUp-18 yeah, because I didn't listen to the joke so I had no idea how much time went between the two lines
@@YounesLayachi same had to rewatch it. I only hope to be able to do that one day.
ya know what else flies around in a vacuum, the whole damn universe
Prove it.
@@HardHardMaster bro missed public school 💀💀
@@azerria3416 Who?
@@HardHardMaster
You
They filmed this in a Canadian island
People desperately want the moon landing to be fake lol
I found it crazy that in the movie Interstellar everyone believes that we didn't land on the moon.
Never trust an edited comment 😂
We didn't and never will in this lifetime.
@@The_Old_War_Elephant cause what would we do on the moon? We already did everything we needed and it would be a waste of money to go back again
@@The_Old_War_Elephant Have you heard of lunar bases for nasa and china?
@@The_Old_War_Elephant they can do it every time they want to, but there is not point. And also did you know the budget of NASA was much much more in 1969 than now? Do your research before talking about a topic that you don't know about.
Dust would fly around easier in a vacuum since there’s no friction between it and the atmosphere
And would fall very quickly do to that very same lack of atmosphere.
You really don't know what you're talking about, right?
@@LocoFompi lol
Based on theoretical speculation that there’s a “vacuum” in “space”..
@@nicholasdriver8253 it's not theoretical, if you take off your helmet in space, you will die due to all of the moisture in your body being sucked out in a few short seconds. But yeah man, guess I'm just wrong for actually learning.
"Remind me to dust my camera, will ya?"
Other guy, not a second later: "Don't forget to dust your camera."
my kind of humor
Right , theyll make sure to keep track of that footage.
@@Boom-Freaka arent they dead?
@@crazyfriend50 think so, i do know that they lost a shit ton of footage of the moon landing though.
Original comment
@@Boom-Freaka We're watching the footage, genius.
Gravity is the reason why the dust particles travel back down to the surface of the moon after the astronaut’s kick imparted upward momentum onto them; it has nothing to do with the ambient pressure (I.e., presence of air) conditions
“I wanted to prove all these theories wrong”
“So I took a quick trip to the moon-“
To the moon📈
Right lol
That would be a Tom Scott video.
“A TH-camr took a trip to the moon. Here’s what happened to his lungs.”
LOL!! Good luck getting there...
Best part is... without air, that astronaut's footprint will forever be preserved, unless someone or something mess with it.
Maybe it’s still there lol
Well maybe in a perfect environment but with micrometeorite impacts that’s extremely unlikely
Unless it snows again and covers em up
The Hollywood set for the moon landing had already been dismantled unfortunately
@@busboy3232 LOL you people are silly with your stupid ideas of Hollywood movie sets LOL stop smoking your cars tail pipe.
Bruh the fact that theres no air on the moon is exactly the reason why so much dust is kicked up… Air makes it harder for things to move not easier
And with less gravity everything is lighter so when kicked it moves farther same when they walk less force to jump farther!
Astronauts = Objects likewise Sand particles also = objects
If astronauts can movie and jump in no air
So does sand particles
Astronauts = Sand particles = Can move
Well, the reason the dirt flies around on the moon in the same way it does on Earth, is because, like the Earth, the moon is FLAT! 😁
Besides the fact, that the dust is statically charged and sticks to everything.
Also our bodies need air around us... Not just to breathe but more importantly we need the air pressure all around us, or our hearts can't pump blood to our brains. All of outer space is fake.
So, are they trying to say that inertia doesn't exist in a vacuum?
Lesson: You can't argue with a brain which contains a vacuum.
Its like everytime they see an object move in space, these idiots always forget that either air resistance, gravity, or momentum exist.
*exists in (not "contains")
If we haven't went to the moon how would he know what mood dust is like
@@nickc5142 they collected moondust & moonrock samples already. Infact they have it displayed on the museum of nasa.
@Tomo_mo I'm saying how would they have gotten all that if we hadn't gone to the moon
Whoever came up with these theories should be removed from the gene pool…
😂😂😂
Edgy
@@vikzn1607 Im right though
No u
the gene forgot what is gravity
I like that some people think a vacuum exerts some kind of force that prevents things from moving. They seem to think it's only the presence of something like air getting in the way of an object that allows the object to move... It makes my head hurt trying to figure out how someone could come to that conclusion.
They confuse vacuum with air pressure. Or maybe gravity with vacuum?
a lot of times though this is coming from the same people that think the earth is flat and that gravity isnt real....I...people are dumb
Amazing indeed 🙄
I don't know exactly where this is coming from but you guys got this totally wrong... Here's from a real scientist... Dust in vacuum do not form cloud dust when tossed around and without moisture it will not stick to any surface... In fact moat of you would be amazed at how dust behaves in vacuum. In fact I guarantee that if the film was real there would be hundreds of scientist just trying to explain how this cloud dust form. You'd be amazed
Same it hurts my head too because it just means no air is their and stuff can still move around
These moons conspiracy theorists and flat earthers are not observant enough.
I like how people keep forgetting about the existence of physics
Can't forget what you haven't learned.
Most people think heavier things fall faster.
@@davep8221 most people don’t know what they are talking about lol
forgetting . they never knew ... average american cant name 5 countries and you think they ever knew physics
@@myname-mz3lo Argentina, Andorra, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Austria I’m an American who can name 5 countries and all start with the letter A
@@davep8221in an atmosphere heavier things usually fall fast, unless of course you increase its drag proportionally
Gravity, momentum, and friction exist inside of a vacuum? Crazy! It's almost like physics exist in space!
right? who wouldve thunked it?
It cant be real
Physics don't explain why that dust fell back down to the Earth so quickly or why they had to slow the video down.
@@mikebass5929 gravity on moon is 1/6 of that on earth.
@@vintage8818 well I just busted you right there buddy if it's 1/6 of Earth gravity then it would take 1/6 of the fuel that it took to put that rocket into outer space and I didn't see any silos on the moon lander.
Actually, you can see there's no air as the dust doesn't dissipate as it would if there was air present for finer particles to float on.
Actually if u have tons of beach sand and a really shitty camera, u won't see any dust...
@@heresmytake2782 my god
@Rolf Hammer the moon is flat.
@@TLK22 nah universe is dinosaur shaped
@@TLK22 finally a man of science
Saying how can the dust move is like saying how can the astronauts move 😂
"Remind me to dust my camera, will ya?"
"Remember to dust your camera."
Cheeky bastard lol
You ever consider the surfice of the planet is mostly dust, just like the genitals of your mom
Yup. That was the joke that was told. Thank you.
@@iplaywhatiwant3738 you're welcome, happy to help
To be fair he never set a timer 😂
Ha, didn't catch that initially.
I love how peoples brains turn off when it comes to the moon.
Moon is Chinese satellite, used to track you
@@FalconTheFries i cant even tell if someone’s being serious on the internet anymore
@@Villosa64 same
Moon is the greatest atomic bomb built by the soviets
Moon is gru secret base that he makes crack in
I wonder if conspiracy theorists understand that vacuum is the most ideal condition to get particles to fly around the way you expect/calculate them to…
I wonder if conspiracy theorist understand basic mechanical physics.
Down to, and including, action=-(reaction)
I wonder if you can demonstrate a gas existing withing a vacuum without a container
@@yoyo-co3tx That’s an age old flat Earth trope that proves whoever asked it hasn’t got the first clue how gravity works! On Earth It’s GRAVITY that’s the container!
Yeah! That’s why Commander David Scott on Apollo 15 dropped the hammer 🔨 and the feather 🪶 simultaneously on the moon’s surface!
@@terrypussypower haha i dont think they believe in gravity. apparently the flat earth moves upwards infinitely, so when you jump the earth is going up and meeting you.
another thing people do is only watch the first landing but they never watch the videos of the last landings...the later missions went way longer on the surface and did way more stuff and no film can duplicate at the time not even close
Most moon landing deniers don't even know there were six landings. It's mind boggling ignorance.
@@JohnSmith-pj6wb slow motion bro it's not complicated it's all slow motion including the last one speed it up and you'll have gravity...
@@JohnSmith-pj6wb Let's make something clear. Humans have never been anywhere near the moon. It didn't happen then, and it still hasn't happened. Unless you believe deadly radiation and extreme flight conditions to the human body are not real.
The ironic thing is the flying dust is proof of vacuum. If there were air (say, on a film set) the dust would billow and churn as a cloud like we’re used to seeing, but in vacuum the tiny dust particles fly without resistance like individual ball bearings.
Great point. Here it swirls around on itself. And there it just went straight lines.
I feel dumb for not having already been using this in my arguments/discussions. 🙃
Couldn’t they just reenact this by being in a big vacuum chamber? Bs nobody has the tech to go to the moon even today
@@reversetetragram we do have the tech but it's expensive and there's not much point
@@Natty11100 isn’t space a vacuum tho 😂 he used a vacuum chamber to compare them so???
@@UsernamesHandle an energy:fuel ratio we need another source of fuel that lasts longer and much better alloys that are lighter than current rockets and possibly years on a journey to reach the moon, the moon isn’t as close as you think it is.
Bruh, them saying you can't make a print because there's no moisture to lock the particles together. It's like saying the moon shouldn't be a planet because it doesn't have moist air to hold its mass together
How did they pass science class😂
The moon is fake dude. Amateur.
The moon isn't a planet.
@@moshunit96 you know what I meant .-.
@@moshunit96 I think he meant planet as in “planetary body” which large moons and asteroids meet the criteria for. Not ‘planet’ in the sense that it is a secondary body to a star.
Apply their logic to anything else and it completely fails. It’s like saying planets can’t move in space because they’re in a vacuum😂😭😭
It’s because the moon still has its own gravidty
Nor would the man himself be able to move😂
@Pope Shabba are you an Unus or an Annus
Hey pope. Earth is flat. This youtuber is with the government cooking up some conspiracy.
@@saidarahaasayyangalam3445 Heh. Jokes.
I guess some people forget that there is still some level of gravity on the moon.
You been there to know?
@@RockwellRhodes With a response like that, I can tell your middle school science teachers failed you.
@@dadrocha7741 Try to think for a minute... how much do you know that isn't the result of someone telling you it's fact? How much do you know that if called upon to do so could you demonstrate as fact? (And you have!)
Otherwise, you have what's termed a faith-based outlook on life. You're trusting that others aren't lying to you... and one look at the social construct of our society demonstrates quite clearly that people in general are quite disingenuous and/or agenda driven.
@@RockwellRhodes It takes only a few words to reach a nerve. I'm sure I wasn't the first.
@@dadrocha7741 It takes a lot of words to reach the simple... in your case, I'm sure I'm the first.
Transfer of energy from one particle to another? Sounds like a conspiracy!
Fake moon landing believer be like
"So, you saying, transfer of energy is conspiracy, and it unavailable...
Ok, ok now I gonna transfer energy from my hand to your face"
People will make a conspiracy out of literally anything.
I have a conspiracy that there is a conspiracy to make a conspiracy out of any advancement in science and technology.
Prove it
@@marcmussenge7533 You are not real and the dark gods are changing my room's temperature not sunlight
the government made you say that obvs
@@patrickdwyer320 what
Whoever believed the whole "dirt cant fly without air" thing seriously needs to go back to elementary grade science.
Its called gas lighting. You’ll figure that one out when you graduate elementary truther school.
@@DR3WSAL3M Did you never take high school physics? How often did they say, "Ignoring air resistance" to make it easier? Did you ever take undergrad college / university physics where they had uniform values for air resistance?
I hope you're just trolling and not expecting your ignorance to be an argument.
If they knew anything about science, they wouldn't believe in the moon landing conspiracy or flat earth.
@@Jrez on god
If we wen to the moon how come we ain’t been back, RIGHT.
Keep it mind temperature is about 240 to 300 minus degree
That isn't true.
Keep in mind that the numbers that you have mentioned are meaningless as you have not indicated what units you are talking about. Also keep in mind that all the lunar landings took place early in the lunar day when the temperatures were mid range. Take care.
I love how he falls. He is trying to maintain balance whilst bouncing in low G. He ends up shifting too far right and tries to re-correct but he is in that giant dumb space suit lol. So he tumbles to the ground looking like a baby learning to walk. Absolutely love it. I wanna go to the Moon!
I don't think the suit is dumb since it keeps him alive
This was actually when that astronaut almost died. The equipment on their back are very heavy and a fall like that could potentially A) break your bones, B) damage a pipe in life support system on your back and you'll have seconds to return to the shuttle.
And no, 1/6th gravity doesn't help 'soften' the fall because a 350lb man crashing into a wall on earth is the same thing on the moon. You'll fall slower but the momentum is still carried.
@@tylza8741 Fair point. It was pretty damn cutting edge at the time. Still, it was also a bulky beast of an outfit.
Also the lack of gravity disrupts your inner ear and your sense of balance.
Imagine if he tore a hole in it
Love how the same conspiracy asks "how can dust move around in that environment" and also "how can dust stay still in that environment" at the same time
They're not trying to make sense. They're trying to make dissention. Because we're still one of the greatest nations on earth and they still don't like that.
Some will say seeing this makes the other questions more relevant…like why is there no dust on the landing gear?
@@awesomedave8484you’re commenting this on a clip where a guy gets covered in dude and says remind me to clean the gear after
@@eliyarrows2456uhhh......"...a guy gets covered in dude..." I think you're watching an entirely different kind of video lol. Sorry, I understand it was a typo but apparently my wife is correct and I have the sense of humor of a 12 yr old.
Thing is, if they were given legitimate answers instead of being mocked for refusing to believe something like the moon landing, they would probably move on instead of coming up with more abd more why's.
"If theres no air on the moon how is there dust flying around?"
everybody who knows a single thing about space: 😐
Nah more like anyone who has any common sense
@@Henry_III Fr though like things move in space, I'm not sure of you've seen this video but it was about the astronauts putting down the flag and saying it shouldn't be moving because their isn't any air.
@@roccoz201 ikr
@@roccoz201 fr
I don’t understand how ppl still think this is REAL FOOTAGE FROM THE MOON like you’re saying they were live-streaming in that year? And they had perfect reception with the astronauts? People that can’t see the bigger picture will always stay blind.
It blows my mind people think that. If the dust can't move around because there is no air. Then how did the astronauts ?
Yikes people are dumb, the dirt that gets kicked up falls back down to the ground just like the guy does when he jumps, the moon has gravity just less than earth.
Exactly plus you can see the dust fall slower than it would on earth
If those theories came from Facebook then you're the one who's dumb for believing in those animals
@F Pedojoe I bet you're qanon? Huh!?
@F Pedojoe sure then why do you believe such silly bullshit. I think you're lying and are definitely a qanon. Especially when you refuse to believe facts. You people whom think science is something to choose to believe in or not believe in are on such another level of stupidity, the word retard isn't even harsh enough.
The footprint on the moon does not match the bottom of the shoes that the Smithsonian institute has of Neil Armstrong's space suit. Explain that for me please.
Mythbusters did this YEARS ago! And proved it to be true that Yes, you can make a footprint in a vacuum and Yes, dust will be kicked up without the presence of air.
Why were there no dust on the module after landing with rocket engine’s. Legs all gold and shiny.
@@larryjones4045 I hate to break it to you, but no one will ever be able to prove enough to convince you of something you don’t want to be convinced of.
@@larryjones4045 the rocket probebly blew all the loose dust away and since there is no moisture, there is no way for the capsule to be covered as if it were mud
We will go to the moon for real, one day, or just even passing vanhalen's ring, and surviving radiations, but not before 2100 at least.
also the fact that it would be more difficult to fake than to actually do in 1969. you could probebly make something believable today with CGI. but back then the computing technology was basically non existant.
“How does the dust move when they kick it” lol idk maybe cuz they KICKED IT.
“How is there dust flying around if there isn’t any wind?”
when you kick something, it moves, and then falls down if it’s close to a moon or similar being
crazy, isn’t it
I just found out about this stuff called gravity. It's absolutely wild
People are morons on this planet. Can’t believe these idiotic questions are called conspiracy theories.
@@yellowflash7696 tell that to the ppl who said “moon landing is fake
@@Dastardly_Duo thought there was t gravity on the moon...
@@emilyservice4670 if there was no gravity on the moon, the astronauts wouldn't be able to land. And if they did somehow land and got out, once they hopped, they'd just be floating back into space until something stopped them
Also, the moon dust is jagged because it hasn't been worn smooth by erosion, so when it is compacted it locks into position.
This caused temporary respiratory problems for the astronauts, from what I read.
@@morgellon7877 what do you mean? surely they didn't breathe the moon dust in?
@@vibovitold maybe contamination in the shuttle?
@vibovitold unfortunately they did. The Moon dust was thrown up onto their suits while walking around (as you can see in the video). It tended to cling to the surface of the suit, not least because it's very easy to build up an electrostatic charge between the dust and suit on the moon surface. So, they ended up bringing dust into the lunar lander, which they would then breathe in eventually, leading to lung irritation for example.
@@teanosugarplease47 interesting, I've never known that - thanks
It's almost as if there are stars, planets and moons moving around freely in a vacuum.
Freely? No
@@JeagerTv Freely in that they're not being impeded by the vacuum of space. Because there's nothing there lol
@@JeagerTv Even if you're implying that gravitational attraction is somehow impeding free movement, general relativity tells us these objects are in fact moving in straight lines, its spacetime which is warped.
@@thedofflin ah, wire...
I would add to this chain, but I am not smart enough.
No need of air to fly, if you put enough strenght anything will fly away... no need of moisture to leave a trace, you can leave a footprint in an all dry desert, moon ground is like powder, weight compress it and you have a footprint, no need of moisture...
Kicking dust around doesn’t require anything other than the dust and whatever is doing the kicking…
Some people are really built different… to bad they can’t be sent back to the manufacturer.
I mean they CAN. If you believe in reincarnation it’s kinda like sending a Joycon to Nintendo and they send you a new one instead of fixing the old.
I meaaannnnn…. You could definitely pass that off as a euphemism for killing someone
Yup, you should look in the mirror as a prime example your inane comment.
The guy in the video is misrepresenting the arguments. He's "debunking" arguments, that no one is making.
The argument about the dust, is about how low the dust is flying, almost exactly how it would on earth, even though the gravity on the moon is 1/8th the earth's gravity. It's actually more about the rover footage, than it is the astronauts kicking it.
I have never heard anyone make the argument that you cant make a footprint in dry dirt, in a vacuum..
This guy is misrepresenting people, to make them look stupid. Which is stupid in and of itself. He's a dishonest presenter, and you just ate it up, without checking to see if the assertions he is making are even real.
Yes, most people are stupid. Also, most stupid people do not know they are also in the stupid camp.
Dunning-Kruger manifest.....
@@carllennen3520 Exactly my kind of irony to have someone talking about Dunning- Kruger, while in the same comment questioning if the moon landings were real
@@carllennen3520 if he’s going out of his way to make those people look stupid it’s because it’s so easy to do it’s barely an inconvenience. Kinda like putting trash in a bin your standing beside instead of just dropping it to the floor. It’s also just the decent thing to do, also a lot like that.
Just because you’ve never seen or heard something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. I HAVE heard the footprint argument. Its a common enough argument MythBusters did an episode debunking it.
The moon has 1/6G, not 1/8. That’s approximately a 20% difference, off the top of my head, it IS significant. What do you expect the dust to do, spiral off into space? It goes up, it’s comes back down in a parabola. I don’t know if you’ve ever SEEN dust kicked up on Earth but it doesn’t do that.
Yes. These people are fucking stupid. And I’m tired of pretending they aren’t to preserve their feelings. Just like I’m tired of pretending to respect their opinions as if they were valid when those opinions are “vaccines have microchips, the earth is flat, Trump won 2020 and 2+2=5.” Pineapple shouldn’t be on pizza is a valid opinion. I disagree, but it’s valid. Claiming that water is actually dry and wetness is a government conspiracy makes you an imbecile, a lunatic or just ignorant, and the last one only applies to people willing to let that shit go in the face of a preponderance of evidence.
Funny thing, the way the dust moves is actually impossible in air, you'd see a lot more dust clouds and it would take a while to settle, the moon dust just falls immediately and never makes any clouds
Absolutely can’t find that doco on TH-cam anymore…..
It’s forbidden
It's your aluminium helmet working well pal?
@@ElRealista. Someone doesn't know basic physics
@@ElRealista. You might want to read his comment again.
@@ElRealista. I feel ashamed to share a surname with you
“People say if there is no dust on the moon then how is the dust flying around?”
The same reason the guy is moving around. Just because there is no air Doesn’t mean things can’t move. Without gravity the dirt and dust will move a lot easier too.
I hate when people start with a _false, illogical concept,_ then build a case. Now we have to debunk TWO things.
How about that 10000 pound jet thruster not kicking up and dirt?
@@T1000.Android Sarcasm right? You're joking?
@@Alvin-1138 I'm just replying because Im curious where this may go. Lol
@@T1000.Android because it's being fired in a vacuum, the gas quickly expands after leaving the nozzle. So there isn't much gas to push the dust around as much as you would expect. Here on earth the impact you see on objects from rockets or jets is because the exhaust stream is transferring its energy to the ambient air. But the energy cant spread out because the exhaust is a lower pressure than the surrounding air resulting in a localized high speed stream of air where you have a large amount of energy in a small area. While the exhaust pressure has no counteracting force In the vacuum of space so it spreads out to be at equilibrium. Resulting in less energy over a larger area. Also the rocket on the decent stage of the apollo lander is designed to be most efficient in a vacuum and isnt that powerful relative to some of the jet and rocket engines we use here on earth
And they will try and argue “but it’s zero gravity! Why doesn’t it just float” and then I realize I’m talking to a stupid person and end the conversation
Astronaut 1- remind me to dust my camera
Astronaut 2- remember to dust your camera
🤣😂
Dust your camera
Dust your camera
Dust your camera
Camera your dust
Your camera dust
The 1/3 pounder failed at McDonalds because the masses thought it was smaller than a quarter pounder. You just can’t argue with folks, they’ll bring you down to their level and win.
I heard it was A&W's 1/3 pounder to compete with McD's 1/4 pounder.
I saw a comment on an entirely different video the other day where someine said their manager asked how much of a job they'd got done. The worker said "A third". The manager said "Everyone else I've asked has done a quarter. You'd better work faster."
Don’t argue with idiots, they’ll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience
No Shit?! 😂 I never knew that mcdonalds fact. It feels common that 33% exceeds 25% 😂
@@malaineeward5249 The 1/2 pounder is even smaller.
There is no point doing these videos. Their response will be probably like "Yeah right, NASA paid you. "
But even so, in doin the test, you now know its common sense. Has nothing to do with nasa
It is stupid to do this viedo because its stupid to proof the dumbest claims. why not proof the serious ones?
Think of the children though! 🙂
Yep. Total proof we went to the moon.
Buzz Aldrin already said it never happened.
Then nasa "loses" the tech to go back.
You're a muppet. Humans will rot and go extinct on earth. We haven't and never will leave the outermost atmosphere. They go to the ISS practically in street clothes now.
Not space. Still in the outer ring of the stratosphere. Van Allen radiation plus the fact that America nukes everything make it impossible to leave.
The dust will fly around, but will drop like a stone once its initial velocity is overcome by gravity. In atmosphere, the smaller particles will suspend in the air, and eventually settle.
That astronaut looked happy hopping around with his arms open lol
Disturbing soil will make particles move around. Just because there is no air, the Moon does have some gravity. That is what attracts the kicked up dust to fall back to the ground, and keeps the astronauts from just floating off the Moon.
Seriously, you see how the dirt seemed to go further and higher and even land at a different rates? I’m not saying it’s aliens, but it’s aliens.
@@chaddsteinberg3758 so you're not saying it's aliens but it's aliens????
So the 10000 pound thrusters on the Lunar lander should of kicked up a bit of a storm then, but it didn't oddly enough
@@T1000.Android The lunar lander used its descent thrusters to slow the vehicle down to a rate where it was barely moving when it touched down and hardly disturbed the surface of the moon. In fact Armstrong kicked up more dust jumping off the ladder to the ground.
@@codetibers I never said it was Aliens...but it’s definitely Aliens 👽😄
Off the bat it makes perfect sense that youd be able to make a footprint in a vacuum. Sure theres no moisture in the air to lock the particles together, but at the same time theres no wind to mess with the print. The footprint is literally in a vacuum, itll be fine.
Isn't the moon footprint gonna be there for millions of years because of the same?
@@cheetoschrist5685 yes
The stupidity of some is frightening. Also you are exactly right.
Yes that's what he just said my little parrot 🤣 thankyou for your brilliant insight 🦜
@@dolefinz0789 i commented this at the start of the video, because obviously footprints can exist on the moon
What does no air have to do with the fact that they’re physically moving the dust? Obviously something won’t move on its own the laws of motion still apply in space.
*astronaut walks on moon*
Conspiracy theorists: that’s normal.
*anything else moves on moon*
Conspiracy theorists: that’s illegal!
ad hominem
I read this as the “blaze the movie fan” clip
actually they don't believe they were on the moon so...
@@Angelkta777 That's all they have
@buffalo wt what is it for you then?
This guy is so smart and knows exactly how to prove a point. I love it
Side note: Theres a difference being smart, and knowing stuff
he's smart, yes. but this is just high school physics. the people who make these theories are extremely dumb.
@@jackieburkhart3268 agreed
@@jackieburkhart3268 yes.
@@jackieburkhart3268 they aren't theories, they are making hypotheses.
But yeah, this guy just has a good, solid understanding of the fundamentals of science, and goes from there.
That's the one thing all of the people who make up nonsensical ideas have in common. Absolutely no concept of scientific fundamentals. It literally changes the course of a humans entire life and the way they process everything in life for the better if a person has that down.
Without it, you're entire existence may as well be halved in value when compared to someone with scientific literacy, and will almost certainly start off their own children for a life of failure as well.
Not to be a jerk but the whole premise of this is kind of stupid. Just look at all the craters on the moon. It’s kind of like a big shoe print
Not really, craters are formed by massive impacts into the solid surface of the object, much different than a shoe print in the surface dust
Most are a BIG lightening strike
@@4Kandlez same thing, different scale
One would think the thrusters of a landing engine would do at least a small change in the surface, maybe a little dust kicked out of the way, but it seems this module was carefully placed there. Maybe by God, lmao.
@@edguitarstanleyeisen6179 in the landing clip from the capsule cam there is debris while landing, cut to next Sean,, no creator, not even dust on that landing pads
You can never give enough proof to conspiracy theorists.
I trust everything da Gubment tells me.
Anyone who don't is a conshpirashay theorist!!
True. You can spoon feed them irrefutable evidence of the six landings and they'll claim pictures of landing sites are fake, other countries and global scientists are lying, and 400,000 people involved with the Apollo program have managed to keep a secret for 50 years. By the way, their lame response to the last point is "compartmentalization".
@@FierceMouse "mUh gUnmiNt"
"twUsT dUh sOyiNsE"
It's not a trust issue, it's an evidence issue. The moon landing has evidence, you don't.
i would be so insecure about the space suit if I fell on the moon
Same I’d get anxious
@@sagejura3856 i would panic
There was a risk that he wold never get up, so yeah
@@coolnamebro that's where the fun part comes in: this was actually real!
@@supertoaster94 the wires and stage were indeed