The Story of Citizens United v. FEC
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.พ. 2011
- Season Two launches on March 1st with The Story of Citizens United v. FEC, an exploration of the inordinate power that corporations exercise in our democracy.
And, for all you fact-checkers out there,
www.storyofstuff.org/2011/03/1...
GET INVOLVED:
action.storyofstuff.org/sign/s...
FOLLOW US:
Facebook: / storyofstuff
Twitter: / storyofstuff
Instagram: / storyofstuff
SUPPORT THE PROJECT:
action.storyofstuff.org/donat...
Help us caption & translate this video!
amara.org/v/BZmD/
![[Full Episode] Hell's Kitchen Thailand EP.13 | 5 พ.ค. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Uhzt_Oprgc4/mqdefault.jpg)
♻️ The plastic crisis gets a lot of attention as pollution, but the environmental impact of plastic’s life cycle starts long before it ends up in our waterways and ecosystems. Watch our latest animation, The Story of Plastic: th-cam.com/video/iO3SA4YyEYU/w-d-xo.html
I wish I first watched this in 2011 and not 2019...
Villy but you’re here now! That’s what matters!
I was against citizens United since day one. The only thing that sucks more than being old is that I've watched this crap happen
Same!!! Dont think most people realize one politician or president is NOT going to change this, we're gonna have to literally mob up and fight against the corporatocracy!!!!
“Corporations United” The SCOTUS should be locked up for this.
watching this in 2020 is so depressing
Slightly more depressing in 2022
Well said.
Watching in 2022 is even worse.
@@MadameRaven1 Exactly even worst, in here then we know, that the system works the same way, just more sophisticated.
It’s worse in 2022
"Corporations are people, my friend!" I know it's true because a corporation running for president told me so.
“Corporations United” The SCOTUS should be locked up for this.
Amen brother
"We have the best politicians money can buy"
-Mark Twain
It was happening way back then and we just let it get worse and worse over the years. Thanks capitalism!
@@LordBrittish Capitalism is the best economical system no matter what
me: ok nice video, helped me figure out my homework on this case.
bassist at 8:37: actually let me bring out a banger and make you forget what you just watched
Faaacts
As a bassist thank you
ONGGGGG 😭
It is so depressing that this video was uploaded 11 years ago and not much has changed
Yes it has. It's alot worse today. COVID19 is just the first Act.
Sadly, it's because corporations don't want it to change!
I can't understand how this video only
has 830,000 views. This is valuable information.
Big thank you to whoever is responsible for
this.
I know, I watched this when it 1st came out. What's new here I bet 80% of Americans don't even know what citizens united is. Catchy name, it should BE COMPANIES UNITED 👍🏻🇺🇲
You vote on basis of what the guy on Tv says to you?
@@hermanhoppe3773 Does that include the “LiBeRaLs GeTtiNg OwNeD using LOGIC” crowd of people like Ben Shapiro? Because in terms of entertainment, it’s up there. Ideologically and politically speaking? Not so much. Who needs books anymore when we can watch Tucker Carlson tout conspiracy theories about how minorities are taking the white man’s job? Good on you for promoting a healthy democratic republic you scat you!
Take note of the legislators that vote against overturning citizens United. They are on the take from these corporations. We need a democratic government that works for the people NOT corrupt corporations.
Today I found out my entire life has been a lie, thank you for this video.
Literally 99.9% of everything is a lie!
I love this series!!! it makes me want to go to Economics
Jesus. This aged freakishly well.
Yes it has. It's sod sad where our country is headed.
This is fucking moronic. It unreal how much people don't understand about corporations. This video is horrendously biased.
@@NextLevelAfrican this video makes it seem like pursuing a profit is a bad thing
@@NextLevelAfrican what do you mean? What do they not understand about corps?
@@jamesp6690 I don’t think you finished the video. I made a comment above would be cool if you gave it a read.
Lmao 10 years later and nothing has changed. We are so screwed.
You might go back to the HUDSON BAY VO?
I love this Supreme Court decision!! Now, I can finally give AS MUCH MONEY AS I WANT to a political party or a campaign!! Yessss!!!!
Wait, wait a minute... I am a tax paying and voting citizen.
Since when do corporations vote for a president?
I love these videos! It let my eyes open to the truth inside the economy, on why more countries are unsuccessful than others. I wish the leaders of tomorrow are watching these videos right now.
They are
Thanks for doing this video guys! I thought it was simple and to the point! Please keep up your hard work and we will help you as we can! You are making a difference one person at a time
People need to calm down with the "the US is a REPUBLIC NOT A DEMOCRACY" comments. The U.S. is a combination of the the two. Our system has Liberal Democratic structure as much as it does constitutional republican and presidential structure. We don't fall into a single category. The rest of the video brings up valid arguments, so if you don't like it, come up with valid rebuttals. I personally think that people are so accustomed to being spoon-fed corporate propaganda that they don't care to educate themselves on issues. Corporations may control surface education but everyone has access to unbiased and true information. Its called the internet.
The federalist papers even say its a republic and that democracy wont work to fix factions. Read federalist 10.
Edward Nigma it’s simply said to kill a discussion. Yes we are a republic but we choose our elected officials through democratic means.
Wrong again! The People need to rise up!
Wake up! Look at the world and what the dirty Republicans are doing!
What you personally think is irrelevant. Wake up. Work FOR The People, not against them! Sheesh!
@@lancethrustworthy Seriously? "What you personally think is irrelevant"?
That isn't something Edward personally thinks, so your comment doesn't make sense. It isn't an opinion, it's a fact. We ARE a constitutional republic-a country where some decisions (but not all) are made by direct democratic processes.
Wow! I was confused about what side to support as an independent in this issue because I somewhat believed they should have the right to spend whatever it is they want due to the first amendment but thank you for clarifying it to me that corporations are indeed not people and will spend whatever it takes to get their agenda ahead! +storyofstuffproject
I have never been into politics, but I worked my entire life to protect our democracy, this is an important video, please watch, and help overturn Citizens United.
You can' buy the next President, ask Bloomberg, he failed miserably. This is a pathetic interpretation of the case
You can't regulate people's speech. A book is speech, a movie is speech, doesn't matter how much money poured into the movie and what purpose. Corporation is a group of people, who runs the corporations? Ghostbusters?
We don't care if you have your donors, the point is that we will not be silenced.
The people crying about Citizens United are the ones who are afraid of the truth. Democrats donors outweigh Republicans donors like 4 to 1.
But the Democrats are afraid because they know that the Republicans side with the truth, and enough money to get the truth out shall sink any number of money promoting the lies.
Cry me a river, kid.
@@markarmage3776 the truth? What is the "truth"...
I mean I am simply asking for a clarification, so vague talking about a so called truth and not explaining it...
As far as my opinion goes, the lack of accountability from the side of a corporation is troubling.
A corporation is not a democracy, it is a monolithic structure where if you somehow disagree with its aims you'd be let go... If these structures take control of a country that would result in a totalitarianism of some sort... So claiming corporations have a right to free speech is absurd, don't you agree...
Just enlighten me, what are you trying to say in the first place?
@@markarmage3776 oh and I am not into bipartisan politics, I think either group has historically been documented to be quite devious from time to time... But still I would be the first to admit I am leaning towards republican side... But as I said in the long run I don't care...
@@markarmage3776 Notice how Mark automatically resorts to praising one of the two main parties over the other, even though this video is not pointing out any parties.
This is exactly why lobbying still exists
This video is so ridiculously good. Nice work storyofstuff
Do you have transcript for this fantastic video to ease the translation into other languages??
THANK YOU for this video! I love it. I share it! It's important!
If you like this video, check out Common Cause, Represent Us and Robert Reich (of common cause)..He explains things brilliantly. PASS THEM ON!
I like this stories. They are easy on the eyes and actually teach you something.
the pain of realizing this important video was released in 2011
I'm glad this video is getting so many views. I hope it reaches 1 million soon.
We are making headway here, Nearly 15 states have called for an Article V. to get money out of politics.
Daniel Salerno, yes, there is far too much money in politics. But you can’t solve the problem unless you first diagnose the cause. There is too much money in politics because we have given Government WAY too much power to run our lives. When the Government has the power to run virtually every aspect of our lives, the power to kill a business or make a business incredibly profitable, business people HAVE to spend money lobbying just as a matter of self-preservation. You want to reduce the influence of money in politics? There is ONLY ONE WAY. Reduce the power of Government.
The unfortunate thing is that alot of the time they put a time limit on bills. So while eventually it could get all the states it needs. If the time limit had expired all of them need to say yes again and the governing bodies have changed.
hey boo. its been 7 years. we aint make much progress
Republic or Democracy, the lives and opinions of the people should matter more than anything! Republic or Democracy, there is still law and we have to act within it, but the people should have a strong influence over the politicians making our laws, not big money driven organizations!
Oligarch*
Please share this!!! People need to see this!
This video is astounding. Thank you for it.
It demonstrates how pervasive the OTHER golden rule is in campaign finance today. Whoever HAS the gold, MAKES the rules. It's disheartening and despicable both at once.
And yet they still want us to believe we're a "democracy"
what are you doing here reading these comments? ... get out side and fight for your liberty and truly your freedom.
I’m 74. Exactly what would you suggest I do?
Wait, isn't 'Free Range Studios' a corporation?
Not a for-profit one at least..
HumanRights4Everyone no one is saying that a corporation in and of itself is a bad thing. Well, self styled communists or anarchists will, but most liberals are fine with corporations. So long as corporations pay their fair share, don't hide money offshore and tax evade, don't impose and lobby for government rules/regulations in their pure favor (eg monopolizing), and don't buy elections.
Booster Gold
The video did seem a bit anti-corporation. The corporations are not the problem here IMHO; most of the people in most corporations are good people, contribute positively to the economy and country, offer jobs and benefits to workers, and aren't even involved in this crap. I'm torn on this issue...I believe in absolute freedom of speech...I just never thought of money as speech...but I guess you can interpret it that way. This seems so wrong though; private money has no place in public democracy.
This is such a good video, but it needs to be shown more
These videos are wonderful. Clear and concise enough that even I can understand them. This one on Citizens United should be watched by the entire population. Maybe then some meaningful action would be taken.
"Vote for this guy!"
Thank you sooo much citizens united had me so confused I really didn't understand citizens united at all!
CEO's aren't necessarily heartless when they maximize profits. Keep in mind, that as soon as you cut profits, you need to cut workers as well. Firing people doesn't feel good and if you care about your workers, you'll do what you can to keep them employed with you.
CEO's will fire workers to make even more money.
I love your videos your so àmazing
Wow... This was made in 2011, and I've only become aware of this thanks to #BernieSanders2016 Sad to think that the original fight apparently didn't get very far, but I'm hopeful that, with Bernie as our President, we can make this change happen!
I'm so glad that worked out for you
***** I suppose that when the world goes to shit, sarcasm is the only defense.
The world is fine. It's nothing we can't get through
***** "Fine" by what standard?
***** I feel the same as I did before, it's just more frustratingly bleak now. "lol"
YES. I am sharing this everywhere even G+ . The truth has to get out every way we can.
THAT WAS MY POINT! THANK YOU GENIUS!
This Video is awesome!!
Great video, i finally understand what this case is about.
Uh huh. That's funny, because she didn't mention the specifics of the case whatsoever; she merely rambled on with anti-corporate sanctimony.
No, you don’t. Because Annie Leonard doesn’t know what the case is about. Or maybe she just doesn’t give a damn about lying to you. NOWHERE in this video does she explain the factual background of the case, the legal framework in which the case was decided, or the rationale of the decision. This entire video was designed to put forth an anti-corporation screed that has nothing whatsoever to do with reality. Apparently, any idiot who is clueless about history, law and economics can put out a video purporting to “educate” people.
@@DJDiverDan436 Agreed. As an attorney, I can say that this is pure rhetoric and in no way discusses the factual framework of Citizens United. It forwarded the popular misconception that CU allows for corporate funding of elections as opposed to the first amendment applying to corporate entities. Every time she referred to "our democracy," I lost more of what little respect I had for her...
@@DJDiverDan436 , she does get the negative consequences of Citizens United correct, and that is the bottom line. Keep it simple, baby.
Michael, she does get the negative consequences of Citizens United correct, and that is the bottom line.
THIS IS COUNTRY NOT A DEMOCRACY IT IS A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
@Skullworld Article 5 of the Constitution provides that 2/3rds of the states may call a national convention to propose Constitutional amendments which would completely bypass Congress. The amendment would then be ratified either by the state legislatures or by state conventions (as with the 21st amendment)
If we are to consider corporations as people, then owning a corporation should be considered slavery then, right?
If corporations are people, why hasn't Texas executed a few?
An excellent point!
uhhh are you getting paid fairly? then no, that’s not slavery...
@@alicelu5691
You missed the joke.
And why aren't they taxed at the same rate as me??? They want all the benefits of individuals and NONE of the consequences!!!😠😠😠
Keep up the great work :-)
Very interesting, I'm persuaded to get behind that amendment!
Actually though, Citizens United, the main antagonist of this video, is a nonprofit organization, not a for-profit corporation...
I know I'm a few years late to this party, but did she even talk about the actual argument Citizens United was making? Did she even go into the reasons why Citizens United appealed their case to the Supreme Court?
No, I think she was mainly here to sway people like me, whom are against this kind of thing. She succeeded, though. :D I think it's good. The last thing any particular cause needs is circlejerking, indoctrination is the key but it seems a lot of movements and groups like to sharpen their indoctrination skills on each other, not opposing agents.
No, and that's why this video is propagandist shit.
No. Because if you had any knowledge of law, in the high courts, the actual decision itself has no precedent. Its just an individual case remedied by the decision.
The legal precedents handed down in the course of the justices making their decision, is what is important.
If I sue you for wasting my time and for some reason the court hears the case and rules in my favor and provides me some remedy - then you appeal, and the appeal goes to the circuit courts.
If the court in the case of You vs Me (2019), revokes the decisions of the lower courts - but does so by rationalising that people in the US cannot make stupid comments, then that becomes law.
This is precedential lawmaking.
Reasoning not supposed to be regarded as precedent, are referred by justices as 'obiter dicta' and are dually noted.
Let me summarise:
If Joe sues Jack for stealing his lawnmower, and the case goes to the Supreme Court, the court might rule one way or the other. It's not important.
What IS important is the legal reasoning the judges use in coming to their decisions. These are precedential - meaning they are law, and can be cited as law.
The process is an artifact of the common law system, and is sometimes called "judge-made" law, as opposed to law made by the legislature.
One more time.
The DECISION in Citizens United is immaterial.
But the majority ruling, the five jurists who wrote that ruling, set new laws and changed old ones.
A Supreme Court decision, like most appeals court decisions, aren't as important as the legal reasoning, and hence the precedential law - now enshrined as Constitutional by the weight of the court - used in coming to that decision, is what is relevant.
I only heard about this Citizens United case because of the Sanders campaign. No other candidate has consistently suggested to overturn it. Why isn't America #feelingthebern?
+Daniel Green Because the "Bern" is for censorship. You should read the actual court decision and realize that by silencing the smaller voices (ie. voices outside the BIG 6 MEDIA CORPORATIONS you'd only have THEIR CORPORATE interests in our politics... like, say, a constitutional amendment that limits our free speech. This video is blatantly misleading.
+WeAreTheShow She repeatedly claims we are a democracy. That is incorrect and a has become widely accepted by most.
Because socialism is a zombie idea
I am currently creating a debate case on this exact topic. It would be wonderful if you could provide us with your source for the 85% statistic.
THIS IS AWESOME!! What a good job...
Why this type of videos are not recommended by TH-cam
Because TH-cam/Google is a "person."
Why a corporation telling us what to vote?
No reason. Just Free speech.
@mlauntube - Also, unlike corporations unions are not a profit-making body. A union is simply the members of something joined as a group for collective bargaining (which is protected by the First Amendment by the Right To Assembly). I agree that unions can be bought or influenced by politicians and sometimes unions are as bad as corporate management but there is more hope for them since they're composed chiefly of everyday citizens instead of shareholders beholden to maximizing profit.
"Why are corporations telling us who to vote for?" Hmmmm... Why are unions telling us who to vote for? It should be both or neither.
Agreed.
That's why Represent.Us aims to effect each the same way.
Unions are not profit motivated. Unions work at behest of the people they represent, the working class
@@fromthebackseat4865 no. Unions work for the self interest of workers. Companies work for the self interest of shareholders
@@rajashashankgutta4334 yes but the self-interest of the workers is fair wage and safe and humane working conditions. The interests of share holders is maximize profits at all cost. Even if that means unfair wages and unsafe working conditions. One is obviously better.
What could go wrong if profit-driven corporations gained control your city's public water systems? Watch our latest animation, The Story of Water! 👉🏽 th-cam.com/video/04jTleV0gK0/w-d-xo.html
Price would probably go down.
it's a republic, so........fail
Money IS Free Speech BUT -- Money IS NOT “Free AND Equal” POLITICAL
Speech!! -- BECAUSE at early Campaign “Stump Speeches” Abe Lincoln & the others were placed “Equally” enough apart to where Voters could move around & Freely Hear All Views Equally!! -- So EVIL “Citizens United” Must be KILLED with “Freedom AND Equality” in Political Speech as the “Supreme” Legal Argument & ALL Campaign Spending Must be “Equalized” so WE can Freely Hear All Mass Media Campaign "Stump Speech" Equally!!
America is no longer a Country ...since 1871.
IS A CORPORATION ..THATS WHY..DO YOUR RESEARCH.
@selvmordspilot, thank you for your response. Thing is, I happened to enjoy Zeitgeist lol. So I am not trying to intentionally put it down myself, but in the efforts of presenting an argument as to what is real vs. assumed/fake, it's hard to stake a "debate" using Zeitgeist information in comparison to this particular film that is based purely on factual data. For scholarly articles regarding Zeitgeist, go to Google and select Scholar, it will take you to another portal. Search Zeitgeist Movie.
the way this is 13 years old as of 2024 is insane.
feelthebern.org brought me here
Bernie Sanders 2016
+godonlyknows13 too much "free" stuff, he needs econ 101 1st. Gov doesn't have money of its own it has your money. I don't understand this faith in the government to fix things, given their track record. Why do you believe they can "fix" things?
skidmoda The government can't. The people can. This is what Bernie Sanders (as well as anyone who knows what they're talking about) tells us. It'll take everyone to cause the real systemic change needed to restore democracy to the united states. But Bernie Sanders is a man who is willing to be the leader of the people (not of big businesses) and help the citizens of these united states claim their country back from those who have stolen it.
godonlyknows13 Yes the people can meaning individuals with freedoms. Meaning Government get the hell out of my way. Bigger the government the smaller the individual. We don't live in a democracy it's a republic, but I see your intent. Bernie I have no doubt echoes a lot of frustrations of the majority of people. However, if you could vote yourself a new car would you? Yes it is of a self interest, but the problem that has unintended consequences from the lack of knowledge of how economics works. It really isn't difficult to understand, but politicians think about votes appealing to the masses.
skidmoda The United States is the richest country in the world, roughly double the economy of China, the U.S. is perhaps the richest country in history... The government can afford this shit without even blinking. It's all in how you distribute the wealth.
Nothing is free, it all has to be paid for. But by making sure everyone pays what is fair, we can afford everything Sanders wants to bring to people.
And just me talking - this has nothing to do with Bernie, per se - if you cut just a small percentage of the military budget, you free up A LOT of revenue that can be redirected toward much more necessary areas.
godonlyknows13 We can just afford it? WHY should they pay for it? Why should the government provide this? Ask yourself is it their role to do this? Why not a non-profit? Why not other non-public organizations? Why not a charity? Why specifically the government? If i want to give money to an organization it's my right and freedom to do so. However as soon as I am "forced" via taxes it lose my choice my freedom to do so. As I said the bigger the government the small the person..and freedoms.
This was a brilliant piece. Vote Bernie Sanders who will overthrow Citizens United.
BETTERWORLD SGT0589 Good for you and keep spreading the word for him! He needs all the help he can get.
+no hassle I'm for the overthrow of this case, but Sanders? Why do you think the gov can fix the problems given their track record? Please help understand I've ask this questions over 20 times, but nobody has given me a real reason.
skidmoda He is shedding light on the corruption that none of the other candidates want to talk about. He has admitted that not Bernie Sanders or anyone can do it alone, but by pulling together we can all make a difference.
no hassle you don't think any other candidate has mentioned this? I agree the message is good and yes they need to do it together. That hasn't answer my question, but you still make an interesting point.
skidmoda Mostly all of the other candidates have taken serious contributions from super pac donations which will no doubt influence their political goals. Bernie is funded by the American people. Plus he is a man who has strong principles that he has stood by his entire life. There are not many noble people like him in politics especially running for office, so voters should take that into account at the ballot box.
@mortalisk I am not advocating violent means to silence, I am advocating any avenue, whether passive or aggressive, be used to regain those voices that are lost.
@yannbane Hydroelectricity does not pollute the water (please site your source). in tropical areas the dams creates some methane but in northern areas the greenhouse gasses created are only 2% to 8% of that of ANY fossil fuel power plants creates.
Wind power is already in use altough it is as you say unpredictable.
It is as you say, you NEED electricity to create hyrdogen, but that could be made using renewable sources.
I am not an native english speaker, so i am sorry for any errors i made.
#FEELTHEBERN
On my desk, there is a notepad and pen. Upon this notepad, I write arguments to points. It sharpens my debate skills, as I am a debate hobbyist. I have never been so opposed to an idea, written so many arguments upon my notepad, only to have to throw the paper away, having been defeated before I could rebuttal.
Amazing propaganda. Thank you for this change in my views.
Nice reply. And an amazing usage of the word propaganda which doesn't imply something dirty. :) www.wolf-pac.com
Jonathan Josh Thanks, guy.
@goldhedge As I just said, democracy is simply a system of governing which can be employed by many types of government. We do employ it here: it's how we elect officials. The U.S. is a republic, but to be more specific, we are a democratic republic. It's not debatable. So specifically, to state we are a democracy is not a lie.
Say it with me now "MONEY IS NOT SPEECH"! It's influence!
Corporations have exactly as much power as voter apathy gives them. Money can't buy informed and determined voters.
You want a bet?
Please, you can buy anyone desperate enough for some glimmer of hope, even if it's an illusion.
the corporations own and control the majority of sources of information other than word of mouth. And if we let them they will control forums like this and twitter and every other means of mass communication.
Alan Parkman I mean this honestly, can you cite your sources? I would like to use this info you just said (if it's true) elsewhere.
Ashley Casey Okay, lets make some lists. Name the radio stations, television stations in a minor or major market, television and cable networks, name the magazines or newspapers or cable or internet providers or any other media companies, cell phone and landline service providers, electronic or printed communications of any kind, etc that that are not controlled by a large or giant corporations or individual billionaires and document how many people get their information from them. Then make a list of those that are controlled by them and how many people get their information from those sources. Then make a list of all the politicians that do and those that do not accept corporate or wealthy interests' contributions. Make a list of legislation or proposed legislation that attempts to censor or tax or regulate the internet or twitter or cell phone communications and who sponsored and or voted for that legislation. Make a list of where you and I and anyone for that matter gets their information. Then document all those lists and cite the sources and who controls those sources and how you found those sources. Remember, information is not equal to truth. (I'm afraid I just created a full time unpaid job for us for several weeks or months. Maybe we could publish the results of our study.) Who are the publishers and who owns them, make a list and document it, cite the sources. Include that too.
So, lets consolidate my thoughts. The research question for our study is this:
Do the corporations own and control the majority of sources of information and every other means of mass communications other than word of mouth?
I made my original statement based on my conclusions from deductive reasoning derived from my own observations and what I have read and heard over the years. So, I don't have sources I can cite off the top of my head. But, I think I have outlined a place to start if you are sincere in your search for the truth. Maybe there is a group of us that can take up that challenge or find some one who already has. I for one would need funding as I am not independently wealthy. (who funds research?)
Well explained but your opinion on the matter is not necessary, each person should be the judge of what position s/he wants to take on the matter. Explaining the facts in a neutral way would have been enough.
There is no neutral way having corporations influence politics this heavily in the US is completely negative. Unless you like corporatocracy
Child support under the Title IV-D program is a huge profit generator for "stakeholders". This case is EXCELLENT in stopping the child support "INCEPNTIVE PAYMENTS TO STATES".
Citizens United ruling which was only a 5 to 4 decision far from unanimous. One quote towards the beginning of Justice Steven's dissent:
"The basic premise underlying the Court's ruling is its iteration, and constant reiteration, of the proposition that the First Amendment bars regulatory distinctions based on a speaker's identity, including its "identity" as a corporation. While that glittering generality has rhetorical appeal, it is not a correct statement of the law. Nor does it tell us when a corporation may engage in electioneering that some of its shareholders oppose.”
I GOT ME A TICKET FOR BERNIE SANDERS 8D
all aboard the sanders train! CHOO CHOO WOO WOO!
HackersSun On this train the first and business class seating is empty. The party is back in the coach section! CHOO CHOOO!
+SwitchingRooskies Everyone knows all the cool kids sit at the back
I am from the future. Sad news, Bernie lost to Hillary
I appreciate the effort into the video. and good points are made.
however the bias is nauseating.
+Indigo pirate
What bias...Say WHAT the bias is. Name it. Are we supposed to guess what you mean?
Indigo pirate agreed
@@DavidJGillCA Anti-corporate bias.
Okay, anti-corporate bias. Now can you make a counter argument, as in, tell us WHY they deserve to be able to donate unending money, when it is glaringly obvious that they will put profit over the well being of our country?
They described why corporate money is a bad thing with examples and visual representations. Albeit, elementary ones for the layman. But you can't just say, "this only represents one side!" when you haven't even told us what your POV is, and why that contradicts theirs. It's like you're just saying "i don't like this song" when it's on the billboard top 100, but you wont tell us what's bad about it.
how does this not have over 500,000 views yet? sad.
@necrom666 What does weather have to do with this?
Go to The Young Turks or Wolf-Pac.com
"This is a democracy." Actually, this is a republic.
No, its both. Democracy is the philosophical ideology put in place by a structured Republic. Democracies say the people shall vote and a republic creates a system that allows this to happen sustainably
@Ralyns correction - on usually held responsible, should be are usually not held responsible
Also, speaking of Amendments, please look up "Article 5 convention of states" Contact your state representatives and governors and legislators and demand that they participate in an Article 5 convention of states.
It is a way for THE PEOPLE (in the form of the states rather than the useless congress) to amend the constitution.
It is a way for THE PEOPLE (in the form of the states rather than the useless congress) to amend the constitution.
typical. I just wanted to know the details of the case so I could draw my own educated conclusion, and instead I just got a bunch of anti-corporate propaganda.
Same.
Kevin Volk anti-corporate? arent we all?
Exactly how I felt. I don't even disagree with their sentiment but the title is heavily misleading
Kevin Volk Go read the decision. it's isn't good for US citizens.
same
1:14 "This is a democracy." Nope; The United States is a republic.
Nope, the United States is a fascist oligarchy.
John Doe Well since Obama was in charge, it sure seems that way.
Will Napolitano so because Obama is no longer president it's no longer a fascist oligarchy ridiculous. You have companies actually bribing the lawyers of the president and his constituents please try to understand other people's world view unbiased and make your opinion off that not whatever you hear on the news
Ty Martinee Actually, I never even said I support the current president. I do agree with him on certain issues though. I made a mistake. It should have been seems, rather than seems, which I changed. The ACA is Facsist, which is what I was implying. Just because I said I don't like Obama, doesn't mean I like Trump. I happen to be a Libertarian Conservative. Also, I don't even watch cable news or read NY Times, Washington Post, etc.
My fault for assuming your political stance usually when I see anti-Obama comments it's some radical Fox news Alt Right person. I wouldn't say ACA is fascist but Socialist this administration however is far more fascist than Obama's by any definition of the term. Obama didn't receive payments from companys and other countries actually bribing him to make certain policy decisions while Trump has.
5:39 First amendment also meant that all voices were equal, so for one "person's" voice to have that much power would imply that the voices of other citizens aren't equal to some because the rules of the structure of the government, and would go against the idea of "all men are created equal"
We live in a constitutional republic NOT a democracy...
***** You mean an oligarchy, you dumbshit! Learn politics before you speak!
Lyle Coulter U mad?
Vote Bernie Sanders!
+Anissa Crispin Margaret Thatcher once said that "The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."
It is a Constitutional democratic-republic
B/C we have a constitution and the majority votes the people in and they are the decision makers or (reps.) for the republic part. so it is just a big combination of of the 3.
when publish the version in spanish, please....
Ermmmm... The US is NOT A DEMOCRACY, it's a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC! The words "democracy" and "democratical" are NOT FOUND anywhere in THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES or in any of the CONSTITUTIONS of the states!
+irwin tomahawk
To call a nation a democracy is shorthand for democratic republic or representative deomocracy. Democracy exists nowhere, yet we refer to "the Western democracies" all the time.
another corporate coffer? do you still believe that corporations are people, and money is free speech after viewing this video? hell, even a 3rd grader could grasp the point and get it
Sweetie pie! A Republic is a democracy ― by definition! The dictionary is your friend… : )
Bernie. Sanders.
You guys do know that the law the supreme court partially struck down, McCain-Feingold BCRA, isn't some century old law, right? It was passed in 2002. We seemed to survive before it's passage.
Excellent information and method of informing! Good Work!
The fact she keeps calling The U.S.A. a democracy when it is a Republic, just makes the rest of the video questionable. Here I was hoping to learn something from a reliable source.. :(
Is it not a democratic republic?
It is a Republic hints "to the REPUBLIC for which it stands"
But the inalienable rights for these corporations that you're claiming are held in the Constitution are subverting the rights of the people, for which it was meant to serve. Plus, why would you favor economic prosperity of large corporations over things like environmental sustainability? Chasing money ain't no life.
Carolyn Lois yeah... you just described a Republic. If you believe your own statement than you are opposing the views of a democracy.
Carolyn Lois you sound like a college student to say such a thing..
@mlauntube - "No! I don't want my dues going towards anything other than collective bargaining!"
I agree entirely and I've heard similar stories to what you just said. Don't get me wrong, I don't think unions are perfect by any stretch of the imagination (especially these days when half the time management and union leadership are buddies). However, at the end of the day I think unions are more controllable than corporations. Unions definitely need to be less top-down than they are today.
@retownsend I'm pretty sure the video only ever said that there's something wrong with profit when it's the highest aspiration.
The 2020 election has seen nearly twice as much outside spending as the 2016 election did at this point in the cycle. This year, outside spending totaled $1 billion over the course of just one month from mid-September to mid-October.
@musza05 I'm not sure of what you're trying to say with the smog thing.... Cities are urban, and electric cars typically reduce emissions.
And my comment wasn't responding to the video. I was responding to a comment right before mine wherein some TH-cam commenter declared that all politicians were corrupt.
@yannbane oh and you should check up on what renewable energy means... In fact about 16% of global final energy consumption comes from renewable energy.
And almost every time no change has happened until things are at its worst
@musza05 Electric cars have higher emissions, not to mention that disposing of the batteries is difficult, to say the least. That's why we need to keep developing fuel cells-- so we can develop the technology and make them cheaper and better.
Chad Kruse claimed that it's impossible to amend the constitution because the representatives wouldn't vote for the proposed amendment; it doesn't take Congress to amend the USC. See article V of USC.
Amen. It's like having an abusive man beat his girlfriend but at the end of the day her coming to the conclusion that in order for him to stop beating her, the guy needs to check her phone everyday, take from her purse to buy her things she may not want because it's in her "best interest" (like lamps and.....idk, licorice or something), and make sure she doesn't make a bad decision ever. Oh he won't physically beat her anymore, but he gets to do all those things.