Does anybody know, if it is possible for porous zone to let only one phase go through with Interfoam solver ? I have two fluids. One of them is like a slurry with very very small particles. This fluid should not go through the porous zone. Only the other fluid phase should go.
I have changed the location of the porous zone. Instead of up side I put on the bottom side and the results are the same. Why is it happens? Sould be the oposit, is not?
If your bounding box is (0 0 0) (0.05 0.001 1e-06), how your box coordinate can (0.002 0.0005 0) (0.03 1 1e-06)? On the box "y" is not out of the domain? Considering that in your domain "y" direction goes from 0 to 0.001?
Hi Luis It is true that y=1 is out of the computational domain. However, the topoSet/cellSet utilities only select the cells in the domain (0.0005 < y < 0.001). It means that it does not make difference if you set y=0.001 in this test case. But for more complex geometries, the box should be determined more precisely.
hello, if wwe are working with a more complex geometry that we want to add a porous media, we are going to do snappyHex and after we finish creating the volume mesh we use topoSet , no? thanks
hi, how do you do to display names over the rendering view ? I'm on the same version but I don't have the "showPatchName" tool in "properties ... Is there a link with the "text" you created ?
velocity near the interface of porus-water is too slow. wall function based velocity is good but it is difficult to be handled. I calculated same problems for river flow with seepage, the river bed B.C. problem exist. wall B.C. is good for river flow but seepage cannot flow across riverbed, do nothing as you did get good velocity for seepage but bad for river flow.
![[CFD] Porous Zones in CFD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sOQMXxoKFQM/mqdefault.jpg)
Does anybody know, if it is possible for porous zone to let only one phase go through with Interfoam solver ? I have two fluids. One of them is like a slurry with very very small particles. This fluid should not go through the porous zone. Only the other fluid phase should go.
Great job and thanks for you sharing!
Great Job! Nice presentation!
Thank you.
thanks for your nice video and it really helps me a lot！
I have changed the location of the porous zone. Instead of up side I put on the bottom side and the results are the same. Why is it happens? Sould be the oposit, is not?
How do you handle a case where the porous media is heated?
hoow to do the same with ansys
If your bounding box is (0 0 0) (0.05 0.001 1e-06), how your box coordinate can (0.002 0.0005 0) (0.03 1 1e-06)? On the box "y" is not out of the domain? Considering that in your domain "y" direction goes from 0 to 0.001?
Hi Luis
It is true that y=1 is out of the computational domain. However, the topoSet/cellSet utilities only select the cells in the domain (0.0005 < y < 0.001). It means that it does not make difference if you set y=0.001 in this test case.
But for more complex geometries, the box should be determined more precisely.
hello, if wwe are working with a more complex geometry that we want to add a porous media, we are going to do snappyHex and after we finish creating the volume mesh we use topoSet , no?
thanks
Yes, after mesh generation, you can specify the porous zone by using toposet.
ALso, it can be done in mesh generation.
@@hyperlyceum60 interesting, didn't know about specifying at the same time as the mesh was created
hi, how do you do to display names over the rendering view ? I'm on the same version but I don't have the "showPatchName" tool in "properties ... Is there a link with the "text" you created ?
Hi, I have the same question as you, do you have the answer now?
can i have the case folder?
Please visit the website:
hyperlyceum.com/sorted-products/tutorial-videos-openfoam-by-peyman-havaej/
velocity near the interface of porus-water is too slow. wall function based velocity is good but it is difficult to be handled. I calculated same problems for river flow with seepage, the river bed B.C. problem exist. wall B.C. is good for river flow but seepage cannot flow across riverbed, do nothing as you did get good velocity for seepage but bad for river flow.