Roland VOCODER SVC-350 // I LOVE this thing

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2021
  • #vocoder #review #roland #svc350
    support the channel / starskycarr
    A look at Roland's Vocoder SVC-350. It's probably the best your money can buy - The Moog is hugely expensive and the EMS Vocoder 2000 and 3000 are incredibly rare (and equally expensive). This isn't bad value in comparison, they seem to sell for around £1500. BUT.. .sounds. a lot better than any other hardware I've used... but then most of them are digital - nothing wrong with that but they don't have the clarity for some reason. I'm not sure if the Digitech Talker has analog circuitry but that sounds very clear too. check out my vocoder roundup for more. • Vocoder Roundup - Rola...
    Perfect Circuit affiliate link:
    www.pjtra.com/t/SENKTExLTUtDS...
    Other places you’ll find me:
    ► Instagram: / starskycarr
    ► Facebook: / starskycarr
    ► Twitter: / starskycarr
    ► Bandcamp starskycarr.bandcamp.com/rele...
    ►ClubbingTV From the Studio:
    • From The Studio
  • เพลง

ความคิดเห็น • 146

  • @SacSynths_Jack_Z
    @SacSynths_Jack_Z 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The human voice synthesizer (& strings) on the vp330 are what sold me, but I do miss that EQ section! Lovely video as always Starsky, really been enjoying your content!

  • @510th
    @510th ปีที่แล้ว

    I've caught a couple of your videos recently and like your straight forward and informative style. Cheers, I'll subscribe :)

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks… nice to hear.

  • @ToddUrban
    @ToddUrban 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome review as always Starsky! 🤩

  • @mikemeengs5720
    @mikemeengs5720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Being a long-time Kraftwerk fan, I have a love/hate relationship with vocoders...I love them done right, hate 'em done wrong. Man, those SVC examples at the beginning if your video are done right! Excellent intelligibility with this thing...
    Top notch!

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      High praise indeed! Thanks.

  • @neilshenton1834
    @neilshenton1834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool! A nice testament to its clarity is the fact that you can still hear your accent mate! 👍😁

  • @bricemyles
    @bricemyles ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have an SVC-350, I also have a Roland VP-330 that was gifted to me by a musician friend that passed away!! I kinda collect vocoders, I have the Behringer VC340 as well and a rare Electric Warp Factory Vocoder, and a Korg Microkorg that I just use for Talkbox (The Talkstar) ...Nothing sounds like the original Roland vocoders though, especially the SVC-350 ..the EQ is everything!!

  • @JohnMcJunkinAZ
    @JohnMcJunkinAZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was once offered one (along with an Ursa Major Space Station SST-282) in lieu of pay during a lean billing month when I was in radio. It is one of my greatest regrets that I declined 😢

  • @nanob0zo
    @nanob0zo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this walkthrough. Cool device.

  • @thegoatcatcher
    @thegoatcatcher 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I kept watching this video over and over. I just bought an SVC-350. Hopefully it arrives safely and in the described condition.

  • @MoCheez
    @MoCheez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Got it to have the Midnight Star sound in the first place. I was lucky enough to buy it when its price was still a three digit number... One of the best piece of gear I've ever owned.

  • @stru9286
    @stru9286 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    No doubt about it, that "Sizzle" is the defining character of this absolute classic 👍🏻

  • @SolidtraxNL
    @SolidtraxNL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's not to love about a Roland SCV-350 - Thanks for the in depth video Starsky!

  • @RIP_Milhouse
    @RIP_Milhouse 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gota lot of use out of this, thank you!

  • @computron808
    @computron808 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I absolutely love my SVC 350. As an Electro Artist. It made me feel so complete. That sound ! I bought it specifically for the ensemble on,style sound. Then I discovered the ensemble off via the foot pedal. And then I was all about the ensemble off. Now it depends on the track. I just love this machine !

  • @magicmastera
    @magicmastera 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the svc 350. had also the new roland. Sold it. It cant be compared to the svc 350. i think there is a hudge difference. That creamy sound of the vintage one. Love it so much. Thanx for the cool video.

  • @djmips
    @djmips 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A good video for anyone interested in the SVC-350. Not just you!

  • @markslandingsandaviationvi3123
    @markslandingsandaviationvi3123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    9:28 That’s some really cool phaser type sounds! Just for comparison, I have that exact phaser sound on my EHX Small Stone via the MODE selector😀👍 Amazing video as always!

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cheers 😀 not tried the EHX, but good to know when the inevitable breakdown occurs.

  • @QuestionMarkComposer
    @QuestionMarkComposer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I actually had a hit with he SCV-350, which is well known in Germany only: Title Theme of „Die drei ???“, the most popular audio play series of the world. This instrument has changed my life.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Excellent story.. I'm off to check it out :)

    • @QuestionMarkComposer
      @QuestionMarkComposer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@StarskyCarr I recommend to search for „Die drei Fragezeichen“ in any streaming service, sequels 1-124, Intro title theme. Synth used: Roland MKS70, Microphone: Beyerdynamic TG-X580, Sequencer: C-Lab Notator on Atari ST. Today I mainly use the Behringer VC-340.

  • @pepejul
    @pepejul 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks great! Maybe one day but for now the EHX V256 is in my budget. Properly dialed it is also a great sounding vocoder.

  • @qlyde
    @qlyde 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So cool and Always fun! Ps I’ve been meaning to ask how your Poly D has held up over time? Might buy one this week but not sure about long term, I think the Sub 25 would be better long term but it’s not exactly what I’m looking for..

  • @electrowayne2918
    @electrowayne2918 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Love my Svc 350. I gave the Behringer 340 and Roland boutique a try.. while they were okay.. I found them not as "analog'ish" crisp and clear as the Roland SVC classic. So I sold the Behringer after a year of use. I got the Roland classic and it was money well spent.

    • @AlainHubert
      @AlainHubert 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I own the VC340, and having had a careful listen at this video, it sounds like the SVC is a little cleaner (probably thanks to that graphical EQ). But in a mix, one would probably be hard-pressed to notice. Since the Behringer is a clone of the Roland VP330, I guess the latter would also sound different than the SVC series?

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It’d be good to get hold of a Behringer to see how it stacks up.

    • @infindebula
      @infindebula 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Apart from the built-in ensemble effect, the Behringer VC340 sounds pretty much identical to the Roland VP330, which is electronically almost identical to the SVC350 (no individual band controls though). To my ears the Behringer shines when you use an external synth as carrier, as Starsky does here with the 350.

    • @infindebula
      @infindebula 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AlainHubert Try running your mic through a graphic EQ before it hits the Behringer.

    • @bricemyles
      @bricemyles ปีที่แล้ว

      True!!!!

  • @electrosonicnebula
    @electrosonicnebula 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice intro. For the real producer guys but surely the funnest one of them all is the Behringer? To me the coolest sound is creating a pad by mixing the vocoder with some real voice, choir and string with the filter all the way down.

  • @TheSwircle987
    @TheSwircle987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nice vid! Although I'd say the Behringer VC340 is worth a mention as well. As a bonus, it also comes with super lush analog strings!

    • @electricjuiz
      @electricjuiz ปีที่แล้ว

      I had both here VC340 and SVC 350...Throwed the VC340 out of the closed window...

    • @kierenmoore3236
      @kierenmoore3236 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@electricjuiz Threw
      Makes us wonder how you got them …

  • @100DollarHeadache
    @100DollarHeadache 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So glad I picked up an SVC-350. I use my RS-09's organ output as the carrier, to have the next best thing to the VP-330. I would have never been able to justify the price of the Moog vocoder.

  • @purpl3t1m3
    @purpl3t1m3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think that the Behringer VC340 is probably the most underrated kit being sold today - I looked to see if you had done a video, and couldn’t find one. Perhaps a comparison is in order. I also have the newer stuff like Arturia Vocoder V, the Jupiter-X Vocal Designer add on, and the Softube plugin. Unfortunately, it feels like only analogue gear really gets the classic sound I’m going for, so the VC340 is the choice for me. I’d still love a VP-330 or

  • @nobbystyles4807
    @nobbystyles4807 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i just bought a microfreak shortly after the vocoder firmware update but ive not hooked a mic up to it yet. this has given me a bit of inspiration though.

  • @tommyboy9998
    @tommyboy9998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Those band gain sliders are the weak point of the 350 - if you adjust one and it makes no difference to the sound, you need to service it - take it out, use carbon grease on the track after cleaning (there are no 'new' replacements out there) also, use the GUITAR input for the carrier and use the harmonic generator for that Fab 5 Freddy FRESH! :)

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha thanks for letting me know what grief I’ve got ahead of me at some point. 😂

  • @jdanielcramer
    @jdanielcramer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lurvly bit o kit 😻 I’m fortunate to have the original Doepfer Eurorack modular 15 band system. Based on how that works, I’d say the ‘EQ bands’ are bias controls for the env follower to filter circuit and that the hold jack is a bunch of S&H circuits for each band, holding whatever each level is at the moment and letting you use it to hold Formant shapes. The Doepfer uses a cool circuit that switches the audio output based on sibilance, creating that very crispy high end. Doepfer we’re even clever enough to pair their system with a voltage to MIDI interface that could record the multichannel (multiband)envelopes as midi data for playback from a sequencer. For real vocal style clarity try using a thin pulse wave instead of, or mixed with the saw, the pulse is brighter in the higher harmonics and mimics our vocal chords 🤓

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice tips. Cheers. 👊

    • @Kung_Fu_Jesus
      @Kung_Fu_Jesus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I remember when that came out and they had a demo on the Future Music front cover CD. It sounded gorgeous!

    • @wellurban
      @wellurban 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was hanging out for that Doepfer subsystem for a while, but they’re hard to come by. In the end I went with Frap Tools’ Fumana, which works really nicely as a vocoder as well as all its other spectral editing tricks. In fact, perhaps one of the most cost-effective ways to get an analogue vocoder these days might be to get a small Euro case with Fumana or perhaps the Verbos Bark Filter. There are lots of benefits to having a fully modular vocoder, such as patching even and odd band outputs as a stereo pair, using the envelope follower outputs to control other parts of the patch, and repatching the follower-to-VCA connections to create strange spectral distortions. But this Roland certainly sounds nice as a pure vocoder!

  • @markhammer643
    @markhammer643 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you can, get hold of the book "How to Wreck a Nice Beach" by Dave Tompkins. It's a delightful history of speech synthesis, speech recognition, and vocoding, from pre-WWII up to Daft Punk and Kraftwerk. Recommended for fans of vocoding.

  • @PJAOK
    @PJAOK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The VP-03 is pretty awesome.. easily one of the most useful Boutique items.
    I can see why you like the more complete unit.
    The comparison btw? would be fairer without using the gooseneck. I find using a full mic w Phantom Power on the boutique makes quite some difference.
    I think the rack unit makes more sense from another perspective - the controls and I:O.
    A Vocoder is a REALLY exposed and attention-getting piece of sound.. you are personally very involved with it when using one.... the risk of it not "doing the thing" when you swap over to it iis palpable. And the VP-04 has quite a few nuances to all the sliders... not easy to be 100% sure of the patching. For that reasom I can't imagine using the boutique live, whereas the rack seems much more dependable.
    btw. LOOOOOOOVE the intro.. I am a vocoder fan and gave myself as a Chrissy present last year the book "How To Wreck A Nice Beach" on the (unbelievable) history of the vocoder. Loved your suitably goofy scifi tribute !

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, yeah it wasn't intended as a proper comparison, and wanted to demo out of the box as it were. But I'm still impressed by the boutique. The gooseneck is a bit too small for practical use though,

    • @tyromelive2851
      @tyromelive2851 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah , exactly what I wanted to say , put in a real mic in the boutique and it is another story…

  • @markgriffiths5122
    @markgriffiths5122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice, thanks for doing this. The other expensive high end ones are the Syntons and Sennhiesers. The SVC-350 manual isn't really that great. I think I read that the Vocoder Plus (original) had one less band? They are very clear as long as you remember to turn off the ensemble which is on by default. I must try the hold thing again as I've been trying to do choir sounds on mine and I find sustains don't sound right, possibly because my voice is weak and despite using a compressor the vocal level goes up and down too much. I think the sliders correspond to the 11 bands but that the harmonics knob was possibly a simple EQ for the incoming signal? I bought mine for alot less than the figures you saw, but they are never exactly cheap. One of the nicest digitals ones is the Electrix Warp Factory. The Korg DVP-1 (also digital) is quite nice too.

    • @SacSynths_Jack_Z
      @SacSynths_Jack_Z 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes correct, the VP330 is 10 band.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And yes correct the manual is rubbish!

  • @offworldnetwork
    @offworldnetwork 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Huge vocoder fan here. i have a few , mainly cheaper ones. My go to is the Microkorg. It has the tonality but not always the clarity.

    • @jamesberry5968
      @jamesberry5968 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have you tried the Electrix WarpFactory Vocoder, it will give you similar character to the microkorg but with intelligent formant processing. really good bit of kit if you can find 1.

  • @Rompler_Rocco
    @Rompler_Rocco 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!! Thanks for this gem. Also, for the budget-minded, may I add my 2 cents?
    One, that I was pleasantly surprised by the intelligibility of TC Talkbox pedal (which has vocoder settings).
    And two, on the Microkorg, the ability to stereo pan the 8 main bands of the vocoder may hold the world record for most underutilized vocoder-sweetening feature.✌️

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All good options :) the Microkorg keeps on giving !

    • @dimitrispapadimitriou5622
      @dimitrispapadimitriou5622 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The vocoder of the Korg ms 2000 has 16 bands ( BPF / pan).

  • @nilsvanderplancken
    @nilsvanderplancken 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's an EMS 5000 vocoder you might wanna check out :) the Sennheiser VSM-201 is another great one.

  • @mechanicom
    @mechanicom 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about giving the Vocal Designer expansion a go for the Jupiter X/XM?

  • @falangistavaleroso9689
    @falangistavaleroso9689 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had an ETI vocoder, it was great.

  • @deastman2
    @deastman2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My favorites are still the Electrix Warp Factory and the Boss SE-70.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Love the SE70. I be got a couple and used to use them on everything. I forgot it had a vocoder.

  • @Doctormix
    @Doctormix 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Coooool!!!!

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for stopping by :) love your stuff. I came across your channel a few years ago with Thriller… absolutely superb.

  • @starglider101
    @starglider101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Laurie Anderson's Superman

  • @chunkystylemusic
    @chunkystylemusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry if this has been asked already, but can the boutique version be fitted with a different mic? The mic on the vintage vocoder looks like it might have a better frequency range. I wonder if that would give the little guy a bit more sizzle…

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes it can and I really should have done that here. If I can get my hands on a Behringer I might demo again.

  • @iamyourfuture808
    @iamyourfuture808 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jonzun Crew Space is the place

  • @handmadeindustrial
    @handmadeindustrial 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Behringer also has that Roland Boutique problem with the natural voice bleeding through too much. I wonder if there is a mod I can do to make it more like the vintage I prefer. Anyone know how to do this?

  • @tunnis7us
    @tunnis7us 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This seems to be the vocoder used on "Beside - Change The Beat" In the end of that track is the famous scratch samples "aah" and "fresh" I quess they used noise and not soundwaves to make the vocals, but! it would be nice to see somebody trying to remake those samples since they are like the samples used in scratching. I have tried to remake, but fl studio vocoders can't cut it. What I hear on this video when you compaire it to the Roland Boutique I can clearly hear the difference on harmonics what the SVC-350 contribute to the sound and I think this is why I can't reproduce the aah and fresh sounds since fl vocoders can't be adjusted to play those harmonics that SVC-350 has. Somebody should try to reproduce them samples though with SVC-350 since the record is so big part of scratch djing.

  • @ezion67
    @ezion67 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Think a honorable mention should go to building a Electuur / Elektor Vocoder from scratch. Today building it would set you back around 200 or 300 $/Euro. At the expense of some blood sweat and tears, you get something very similar to the $5000 Moog.
    The Vocoder was published around jan/feb of 1980 and the voiced/unvoiced detector a couple of months later.

  • @iamkeiju6756
    @iamkeiju6756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i was the 350th like - maybe i'll get one one day :)

    • @brunosco
      @brunosco ปีที่แล้ว

      … for just 350 bucks.

  • @AlainHubert
    @AlainHubert 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about the very affordable, all analog Behringer VC340 (clone of the Roland VP330)? And you get a strings machine as a bonus... Thanks for sharing.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, not tried one yet. Would love to get my hands on one.

    • @PJAOK
      @PJAOK 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr That one also strikes me as interesting.. it has the whole original form factor thing happening too. (Even of there aren't wood panels)

  • @Kung_Fu_Jesus
    @Kung_Fu_Jesus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you’ve got a boutique VP03 it’s well worth upgrading the mic as the swan neck mic provided is pretty cheap.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Defiant I should really have swapped mics here, but it wasn’t a thorough test. More of an afterthought. But I do t think the differences I heard were all due to the mic tbh. Maybe I’ll try again if I can get my hands in a Behringer!

  • @dietervolke7811
    @dietervolke7811 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is no EQ built in the SVC350 , what you are doing is changing the "output level" of each of the "synthesis filters".
    Buy /build your self the "VOIS vocoder", superb value for money if you looking for analog vocoder.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for getting to the bottom of it. It’s not exactly clear from the manual.

  • @Skechi
    @Skechi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thumbs up for Freq Nasty

  • @peterkarczewski8200
    @peterkarczewski8200 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its good to hear the scouse voice remix on intergalactic 🤙

  • @MrArpSolina
    @MrArpSolina 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nobody commented on the Waldorf STVC. Is it any good?

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’ve never used it. I love Waldorf stuff in general. Don’t forget it’s digital not analog, not that it’s an indicator of sound quality in itself, but will probably have a different tone to this.

  • @ericques9974
    @ericques9974 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, question.... I already have a track recorded in my recorder, can I just use this to get that Transformer effect using an AUX or something like that ?????????

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes you can use the audio you’ve recorded - it’s how I use it.

    • @ericques9974
      @ericques9974 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr Thank you, how would I hook it up as far as this Roland goes ? On my patch bay, out from my track 1 where my vocal is recorded and into this Roland ?????

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ericques9974 send the vocal through its own output channel into this.. then send a synth or something from your daw on its own channel to the carrier input.

    • @ericques9974
      @ericques9974 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr Thanks, so I lost you with the synth part, lol. Output of my vocal " INTO " this Roland. Output of this Roland, should be tha sound of this Roland and the OUTPUT is going into a WHOLE new track INTO my recorder. No synth please, I just want the effect on the actual vocal :)
      Problem that I am running into, is I can't even get an input signal going INTO this Roland from my OutPut of my vocal. Is there any switch on this actual Roland that would not show input coming in ? And thank you for your time. The switch on this Roland as you know is... Instrument.. - 30... - 15... 0 DB.. I don't think I am using the instrument in this at all but what should that instrument be at please and Out Put... ?

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ericques9974 this doesn’t make any sound of it’s own, it takes a synth sound and modulated it with the vocal. So you need to have 2 inputs - a vocal and a synth. Without both you won’t hear anything.

  • @TheTubeBaer
    @TheTubeBaer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Got mine today🎤 🤖❤️

  • @AppleKid
    @AppleKid 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It sounds like all the rest man. I think you have to program it with code in order for it to sound more human. The best vocoder that I have found is izotope vocal synth 2 vst plug in.

  • @mr.irrelevant3588
    @mr.irrelevant3588 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the Roland V-Synth XT has a great vocoder.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha I’m beginning to realise I’ll get suggestions for every vocoder in the market … and actually it’s really useful for anyone reading the comments. There are so many good ones in the market. But any I’ve used don’t quite have the clarity and ease Kim of sitting in a mix of this. Others are definitely more within reach especially if the my come with a free synth and keyboard!! 😀 cheers.

    • @mr.irrelevant3588
      @mr.irrelevant3588 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr yeah nothing beats an original.

  • @soundeducation5554
    @soundeducation5554 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That new boutique vocoder sounds more clear and intelligibele, the old one more robotic and character. I guess I'm the only one that prefers the new vocoder..

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It sounds to me like there is some of the original vocal coming through with the boutique. Maybe that’s why it sounds more natural… or maybe because it sounds less robotic I think there’s more of the original audio in the signal 😂

    • @soundeducation5554
      @soundeducation5554 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr Um.. no I beg to differ, doesn't sound to me like it is. Anyway, thanks for putting up this excellent video, really helpful!

  • @starglider101
    @starglider101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mike Oldfield's QE2

  • @SR-ih1be
    @SR-ih1be 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My SVC-350 has been my secret weapon for the last 15 years. There's a ton of wonderful options that don't involve making talking/robot sounds. It's a modulation powerhouse. The only other vocoder worth considering (IMO) is the Waldorf Lector, which is digital.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was thinking about demoing different uses… maybe in the future I’ll make a more general vocoder tutorial.

  • @juliantaylor5956
    @juliantaylor5956 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm having a crisis now! I'm looking for a better vocoder than the microkorg, and I had my sights set on the roland either boutique or the berihnger clone, but this sounds so nice, and the ability to patch any instrument as a source is fantastic. I also have a 19 inch rack oscilloscope lying around and this may be the excuse I need to buy a rack.... ahhh!

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh dear…I’ve never found one better than this 😂

    • @juliantaylor5956
      @juliantaylor5956 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@StarskyCarr sold! I need to invest in outboard gear regardless

  • @troyouttram
    @troyouttram 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Trying to save my money at the moment. What’s your favourite vst plugin vocoder that’s close to this?

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Softube is great but currently only UAD

    • @troyouttram
      @troyouttram 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr oh damn I don’t have their interface so I don’t think I can use their plug-ins :(

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@troyouttram there are others but I like this one a lot.

    • @troyouttram
      @troyouttram 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr any other vsts non uad? Or do you think I would be better off buying a $600 aussie vp-03?

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@troyouttram if your looking for software try this free version from TAL tal-software.com/products/tal-vocoder

  • @georgedamis2495
    @georgedamis2495 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does it compare to the Roland vp330?

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've never used one, but I think its the same vocoder engine

  • @fred_channel
    @fred_channel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    strange does not exist a software emulation in 2023 of this kind of machine

  • @tonttu303
    @tonttu303 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Virus C vocoder suits me best

  • @moritz_schoenermann
    @moritz_schoenermann 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    that vocoder mixed with voice can be heard on Julia from Eurythmics´1984´s song Julia. I think you may get demonetized for sounding like those other guys you mentioned. I would sell the vintage one and the boutique one and get me an Behringer VC340 Vocoder! :)

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would love to try the Behringer - the only issue for me is space. This fits neatly into my rack.

    • @subs4794
      @subs4794 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@StarskyCarr Next do a comparison of VST vocoders... No space excuses! :)

    • @moritz_schoenermann
      @moritz_schoenermann 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr That VC340 is soundwise at least 99% identical to the VP330+ [Laurie Anderson´s OH SUPERMAN]. I thought Behringer would release an "rackversion", but no news yet! :) I think the best and cheapest hardware solution for vocoding is the METALVOX pedal vocoder from Alesis... I still have my one. :) Thanks for your comment. :)

    • @infindebula
      @infindebula 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My favourite Vocoder/voice mix in a song is most definitely “Lost Again” by Yello.

  • @fredj.7367
    @fredj.7367 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why, don’t you test them with the same mic? 🤔

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because I never thought of that!! haha.. the big difference is the amount of original signal that seems to be present in the audio. The mic doesn't change that. Also wanted to demo with the mic it came with. But for more scientific evidence .. yeah using the same mic would be better. The comparison was an afterthought tbh, I thought I might as well do a quick one while I had the 350 all set up on camera.

  • @markhammer643
    @markhammer643 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The expensive vocoders have more bands. Do you NEED more bands, though? Many audiophiles will say that a 3-band parametric EQ is generally sufficient for sound tailoring. EQ units with 15 and 31 bands have that many bands because the manufacturer can't anticipate *where* you might need boost or cut. If you can dial in *where* the boost/cut needs to be, you don't need as many bands.
    Okay, let's apply this to vocoding. All voices share a little something in common, but also have unique qualities. If I could map the properties of my voice, or yours, and pinpoint the range and resonances, perhaps 7 or 8 bands , tuned to the specific voice parameters might be all you need to track and mimic voice. Of course, doing this in the analog domain could be complicated. Making tunable bandpass filters is easy enough, but the passband that *detects* the envelope, and the passband that envelope is *applied* to, need to be identical. If they're fixed, that's a lot easier to design and implement than making them tunable/variable.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Softube vocoder on UAD has different numbers of bands so you can clearly hear the difference in the various characters. As you say more isn’t always better… just different.

    • @infindebula
      @infindebula 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I used to use the EVOC software vocoder in Logic quite a bit. It can have as many bands as you like, but it starts to sound less intelligible when you go above about a dozen bands.

  • @bangkokdangerous2507
    @bangkokdangerous2507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    now i dont want to sell mine anymore :(

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha me too! I was sort of hoping the boutique would give me the same vibes but doesn’t quite get there.

    • @bangkokdangerous2507
      @bangkokdangerous2507 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr lets hope the modular system im after with the proceeds will be worth it :))

  • @sebastiennesp1978
    @sebastiennesp1978 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey don't worry about whether your vids are "any use to anyone anywhere" cos they're entertaining, and make me spend more money on gear I didn't think was essential... Yikes!

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha cheers. Just remember its ALL essential 😂

  • @Guy-iv2hw
    @Guy-iv2hw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This vocoder like most of vocoders sounds totally noisy and unclear. I don't understand why vocoders are some forgotten theme of technology. The only clear vocoder in history is Digitech Talker and I just don't get it why no one ever recreated it yet or did something similar. You if tried to sing Harder, Better, Faster on the thing in the video it would sound like noise with some weird, unclear vocal in the background.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I demo’d the digitiech in my roundup and you’re right it’s super clear. The thing in the video can do harder better better than harder 😂

    • @Abruzzo333
      @Abruzzo333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because not everyone is interested in having everything sound completely clean and sterile all the time. Raw and noisy can be a good thing. When vocoders are used in a track, they sound ace and you tend not to hear the noise when there's other music behind it.

    • @kierenmoore3236
      @kierenmoore3236 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, was hoping for a side-by-side comparison of the SVC-350 with the Digitech Talker … ! 🥺

  • @cedricblanc7087
    @cedricblanc7087 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please stop with the flashing hypnotic images, so annoying. Great demo besides that

    • @cedricblanc7087
      @cedricblanc7087 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And you had to make it with a big orange bottom of the screen. I really hate it

  • @deastman2
    @deastman2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My favorites are still the Electrix Warp Factory and the Boss SE-70.

    • @StarskyCarr
      @StarskyCarr  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I forgot about the SE70 I’ve got a couple of them lying unloved on a shelf. I used to use them all over everything.

    • @falangistavaleroso9689
      @falangistavaleroso9689 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StarskyCarr great chorus ,delays and ring mod there. I love my se 70