3 Alternatives to Fujifilm 56mm F1.2 | Sigma vs TTArtisan vs Viltrox

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @Tudor_Mateescu
    @Tudor_Mateescu  หลายเดือนก่อน

    🎁 GET Your FREE PHOTOGRAPHY Lessons lyp.ro/ok
    📷GEAR in this video
    1. Buy this for best semi pro-work amzn.to/4d6386R (aff)
    2. Best bang for the buck lyp.ro/ttartisan56mm (aff)
    3. Buy this for family and street photography because it's the lightest amzn.to/4ci5bU3 (aff)

  • @kalistratov_photos
    @kalistratov_photos หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Sigma can be updated just like a regular Fujinon native lens. No need for a type c port.
    I totally loved the sigma 56, but for me Fuji 90 f2 replaced it.

  • @9Mtikcus
    @9Mtikcus หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sigma updates exactly the same as Fujifilm lenses

  • @jameszhan3162
    @jameszhan3162 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am new to the 85mm equivalent, I was exploring Fuji 56mm 1.2 mark II vs sigma 56mm 1.4 to pair with XT50. Do you recommend to take the Fuji with the double price ? Is the performance better on Fuji for the price difference?

    • @Tudor_Mateescu
      @Tudor_Mateescu  หลายเดือนก่อน

      For sure it is much better. If weight, price and size aren't a problem get Fujifilm lens.

    • @jameszhan3162
      @jameszhan3162 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Tudor_Mateescu Thank you, hope to find one with discount , and try the Fuji 56 soon

  • @Oliver46233
    @Oliver46233 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just got the TTArtisan 56mm/f1.8, and I’m really impressed. The sharpness is insane, especially for portraits."

  • @LukeWorrall-k6w
    @LukeWorrall-k6w 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nice comparison video. I bought the TTArtisan 56mm f1.8 recently. Great value for the money. Super sharp at f1.8. The metal feels really solid and well-made.

  • @drchtct
    @drchtct หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the quality control on the Chinese lenses is terrible, some reviewers say they are super soft, some others say they are super sharp, apparently it's like a lottery

  • @serbiesinchi1953
    @serbiesinchi1953 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks man this is by far the best comparison review. Simple, concise and straight to the point we absolutely love it

  • @gabrielsabanal8819
    @gabrielsabanal8819 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hi sir, can i ask which lenses you review in this video the ttartisan and viltrox. which lens is louder motor when in focusing? Thank you❤

  • @FaustoFerreira
    @FaustoFerreira หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sigma is updated through the câmera body, like a native lens. I have 56, 30 and 18-50 all updated

  • @vnhoangha
    @vnhoangha หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @yamazaru8236
    @yamazaru8236 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Since there's a couple videos like yours I'm curious: did everyone purposely omit the older Viltrox 56mm 1.4 or just forget it exists?

    • @Tudor_Mateescu
      @Tudor_Mateescu  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had it. Really loved the rendering but it wasn't too sharp at f1.4 and the AF was slow.

    • @yamazaru8236
      @yamazaru8236 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Tudor_Mateescu so where would it go in the 56mm range for fuji?

    • @Tudor_Mateescu
      @Tudor_Mateescu  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@yamazaru8236 on the last place fot AF, and not being sharp enough at f1.4. But for me personally on the second place after TTARTISAN just for the glass - Minolta rendering. I'm really curious if the focus is better now on X-T50... The rendering is UNIQUE with that lens. If they will do a mark Ii... then it will be another discussion.

    • @yamazaru8236
      @yamazaru8236 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Tudor_Mateescu very interesting, thank you!