Episode

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 64

  • @doitlive1279
    @doitlive1279 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    love u big dawg

  • @meierjoe
    @meierjoe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The best! I am trying to listen to all the years I have missed.

  • @djriize
    @djriize 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My top 5 favorite podcast. Thanks mr west

  • @lucidboi5334
    @lucidboi5334 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm at episode #63! Gonna catch up with you fellas!

  • @hannalin6856
    @hannalin6856 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thumbs up from a Taiwanese listener! Looking forward to the following series of Habermas!

  • @sofiaflippant
    @sofiaflippant 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey, I love your podcasts. They make philosophy so easy to understand! You should also make a podcast on J.L.Mackie and Meta-Ethics!

  • @eternalbyzantium262
    @eternalbyzantium262 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love your channel! Could you please do a video on the nature of freedom and human rights please!

  • @OTOUM108
    @OTOUM108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    finally a new episode!! , keep em coming love your content

  • @krzeszewski
    @krzeszewski 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    nice to hear you back. will listen to sleep...

  • @cristinaperezayalacano3428
    @cristinaperezayalacano3428 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Loved it, especially the fork in the eye example. When's pt.2 coming?

  • @oliwia83
    @oliwia83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank u so much for making this podcast ❤️❤️

  • @anuraglichade9760
    @anuraglichade9760 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been following this channel for a while and I may not understand all of it but I still like the content you make and if
    you do an episode about an Indian philosopher that would be great.

  • @PhilosophiCat
    @PhilosophiCat 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ah, Habermas. I hated this guy in college. This will be interesting to listen to. Wondered when you'd get to him.

    • @timhorton2486
      @timhorton2486 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why did you hate him in college?

  • @elmarievisagie3719
    @elmarievisagie3719 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is there a pt2?
    I love this!!!!

    • @bdosreisable
      @bdosreisable 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      where is the part 2

    • @victorangeles655
      @victorangeles655 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bdosreisable th-cam.com/video/8avDYFghWbo/w-d-xo.html&pp=ygUjcGhpbG9zb3BoaXplIHRoaXMgbWFyc2hhbGwgbWNjbHVoYW4%3D

  • @LuisFernandoImperator
    @LuisFernandoImperator 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This episode is so full of logical holes and hidden premises that it feels like a test for the listeners to see who's really paying attention.

  • @davidtrujillo993
    @davidtrujillo993 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very interesting made me recall an old conversation Sam Harris had with J.B Peterson, in that conversation for Sam the concept of what is Truth had nothing to do with its effects on us. In a way, for Sam, there was no hierarchy of Truth, while for JB even when there might be a scientific truth, it is not enough we still need to figure out what to do. While for JB that was a mistake. At the time I felt Sam's point was easier and more common sense, but as I thought about more and more somehow it seemed intuitively wrong. And now I completely Agree with JB. seems to me Habermas was tapping on something similar to JB.

  • @saljooqhudayar3543
    @saljooqhudayar3543 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which books would you recommend for further reading about Public sphere?

  • @susanwright6873
    @susanwright6873 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The economy and the government as one...this explains a lot. And the role of media as a sales force. I love the idea of commutative rationally/conversation BUT I also wonder how many people can separate out, any more, what they really believe from what they’ve been sold.

  • @DevinGill-ue4gt
    @DevinGill-ue4gt ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Still waiting for Habermas Pt. 2! : )

    • @TheTrippnotist
      @TheTrippnotist ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes... what happened!

    • @misaelgonzalez3580
      @misaelgonzalez3580 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Way over his cognitive capabilities and his right wing preferences

  • @jamalan7417
    @jamalan7417 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The irony in all of this, is that Habermas required Instrumental Reasoning in order to critique Adorno.

  • @maryjanemccarthy2907
    @maryjanemccarthy2907 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome!!!

  • @alexrichter1362
    @alexrichter1362 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Generally, no generation of humans should ever have the freedom to vote themselves into slavery, because it would take the freedom away from the next generation to decide for themselves how they would want to be governed. So when the state becomes too powerful, every citizen, politician, and soldier inside that system has an obligation to the next generation to abolish that state and establish a new government.

  • @trevorrobbins110
    @trevorrobbins110 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your content. Keep up the good work.

  • @Vladimir-Struja
    @Vladimir-Struja ปีที่แล้ว

    why dont you have an episode on slavoj zizek

  • @criticalcreeps2274
    @criticalcreeps2274 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello, I am new to the podcast and I wanted to ask.
    What is the enlightenment?

    • @CH1K3N99
      @CH1K3N99 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Look at the episodes regarding the frankfurt school of enlightenment. I think there were a series of 4 or so. They are a really good listen!

  • @vitorcarvalho5716
    @vitorcarvalho5716 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Stephen, do u think Habermas, partially, answers to some problems that Carl Schmitt saw in liberalism?

  • @mabelpan2532
    @mabelpan2532 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does anyone know Stephen West's email? thanks!

    • @villisnejko2271
      @villisnejko2271 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was curious about this too. If you know it thatd be great!

  • @jarneschruers1672
    @jarneschruers1672 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey stephen
    I am a 22 year old history student from Belgium who just found your podcast a few weeks ago. When i am working i have the chance to bingelisten your content, and i love it.
    I just arrived at the episodes about Nietsche.
    But i have a question for you.
    As you may know, there is a social conflict going on, first in the USA and now in Europe to.
    The thing that frustrates me is the destruction of the statues and removal of historical artifacts that dont coincide with the political correctness of today. For example statues of slave owners.
    As a self proclaimed historian, it breaks my heart if i see what is happening. With me on the sideline, not knowing what to do.
    I found some wisedom in your video's on 'tolerance', 'Slavery' and 'is killing animals For Food Morally Justifiable?'.
    Where you compare slave owners to meat eaters of today.
    The question that i have is:
    Do you have views or advise on the matter as I would really appreciate your help while i try to unravel the matter in my head.
    I am sorry for the vage question and maybe some spelling mistakes.
    Thank you for the amazine content!
    Greetings
    Jarne

    • @neygrant6329
      @neygrant6329 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Statues are acts of memory and memorialization, not history. Not that there isn't a relationship, but its not at all a linear one. What we choose to memorialize says a lot about the sort of values we hold as a people (speaking of Americans for instance, since you brought up statues of slave owners in the US).
      You bring up an apropo point in a discussion of Habermas and the public sphere because the question is - what is the public good we seek to uphold? Again, this is what statues represent, not history as such.
      And as a public matter, these statues should be (and are, unavoidably) public decisions. It is up to the American public what they choose to memorialize, and the fact that so many statues were removed in recent years (mostly by City councils, sometimes by activists) is a testament to a changing public. That is normal, and should be celebrated. There's enough to history to fill endless parks with statues, there will always be new events to memorialize that better describe our values.
      (last point - no statues do not help us remember the horrors of slavery, they often serve just the opposite. The fact that the confederate statues were mostly added decades after the civil war by groups like "Daughters of the Confederacy" illuminates this point. Memorializations like that serve to glorify, or at the very least soften our understanding of the actual horrors of this history.
      As a self described historian, take a second to reflect on the fact that the debates about the statues have actually contributed to more public discussions of history than the statues themselves ever produced! A benefit to historians everywhere, and to history as such (but not to memory!)
      www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/19/storm-americas-statues-history-whiteness

  • @jcsto
    @jcsto 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great content. Just please, can the voice be a little bit more louder? Fan of the podcast!!

  • @christianpalacio3464
    @christianpalacio3464 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ey steven when would you have the script of this episode? like me, I guess not all your listeners are anglos speakers. I do my best, but a script would help a lot.
    Keep doing it. you are the best philosophy teacher

  • @samstockton4775
    @samstockton4775 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are the closed captions for this video solely in Turkish?

  • @ignaciojavierkairuzeguia599
    @ignaciojavierkairuzeguia599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    WHY IS THIS CONTENT NOT BEING MONETIZED??

    • @whalecat8049
      @whalecat8049 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are no are because it is a podcasts

    • @natashaabdul1903
      @natashaabdul1903 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well, he has a patreon page...

    • @LuisFernandoImperator
      @LuisFernandoImperator 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He makes a nice amount of money on Patreon

    • @lulamax7942
      @lulamax7942 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why should it be?

  • @spenserkussin-gika2632
    @spenserkussin-gika2632 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    SO good.

  • @WhoToldYouThis
    @WhoToldYouThis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What do you think of the hermetic teachings of thoth?

  • @1872959
    @1872959 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do one on Giambattista Vico?

  • @nocarreztlem3352
    @nocarreztlem3352 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Economic growth" we were living in heaven before totalitarian agriculture.

  • @jpgo5
    @jpgo5 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    "He just calls it 'the system'.. but the point is". LOL THE SYSTEM.

  • @BaninDiarSukmono
    @BaninDiarSukmono 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would not mind even if this channel is monetized.

  • @3ikhu
    @3ikhu 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Predatory Buffalos Strikes back!

  • @rasmussrensen2029
    @rasmussrensen2029 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do we evolve from global capitalism?

  • @willscov
    @willscov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you do a Ted Kaczynski episode?

  • @natemathewson5200
    @natemathewson5200 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Dudes named Jürgen... I swear man...

    • @LS1056
      @LS1056 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      When you are named Jürgen, you are destined for philosophy

  • @illprovidetheperspective
    @illprovidetheperspective 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've made some videos with snippets of the philosophize this podcast over some nice nature videos and chill music if anyone wants to check them out! I'm getting into video editing and these podcasts (well especially the ones about existentialism) always make me feel better about life, they're just like 2 minutes long and take the main points :)