LIVE: MA v. Karen Read Day 14 - Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial | COURT TV
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ค. 2024
- LIVE COURT CAM: MA v. #KarenRead - DAY 14 - Testimony continues in the murder trial of Karen Read. Read is accused of murdering her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, whose body was found in the snow outside of another Boston officer’s home in Canton, Massachusetts.
Prosecutors allege Read hit O’Keefe with her car and left him to die in the snow. But Read’s defense team says she never hurt O’Keefe and that she is being framed by the true killers, who may have been inside the house where his body was found.
TRIAL NOTES:
00:17:42 ON THE RECORD - MA V. KAREN READ
00:19:09 STATE WITNESS #38) Matthew McCabe, Husband of Jennifer McCabe/Related to the homeowner of the property where the victim was found
00:46:24 Cross-Examination of Matt McCabe
02:10:03 Morning Break
02:34:02 Cross-examination of Matt McCabe continues
03:20:06 STATE WITNESS #39) Jennifer McCabe, wife of Matthew McCabe
04:08:28 Lunch Break
05:10:24 Direct Examination of Jen McCabe continues
#CourtTV Catch up on all the facts of the case against #KarenRead, Killer Or Cover-Up #MurderTrial. ⚖️👇
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter www.courttv.com/email/
Court TV Podcast www.courttv.com/podcast/
FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook / courttv
Twitter/X / courttv
Instagram / courttvnetwork
TikTok / courttvlive
TH-cam / courttv
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE www.courttv.com/trials/
HOW TO FIND COURT TV www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/
![เกิดใหม่ทั้งทีก็เป็นสไลม์ไปซะแล้ว ซีซั่น 3 - ตอนที่ 57 [ซับไทย]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pNhft3YZFRE/mqdefault.jpg)
*TRIAL NOTES:*
00:17:42 ON THE RECORD - MA V. KAREN READ
00:19:09 STATE WITNESS #38) Matthew McCabe, Husband of Jennifer McCabe/Related to the homeowner of the property where the victim was found
00:46:24 Cross-Examination of Matt McCabe
02:10:03 Morning Break
02:34:02 Cross-examination of Matt McCabe continues
03:20:06 STATE WITNESS #39) Jennifer McCabe, wife of Matthew McCabe
04:08:28 Lunch Break
05:10:24 Direct Examination of Jen McCabe continues
#CourtTV Catch up on all the facts of the case against #KarenRead, Killer Or Cover-Up #MurderTrial. ⚖👇
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/?
So, I am at the end of Matt's testimony. Bev apologizes to the jury for how long his testimony is taking. These text messages were Very important. She is so biased. Her behavior is completely unacceptable. It is infuriating. Now on to Jen. Let's see how Auntie Bev handles the rest of the day!! Stop sighing, Bev and do your job!!!!!!! Tell them "the guy" never went in the house! UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Exactly! MENOPAUSE BEV NEEDS TO RETIRE! VERY UNPROFESSIONAL AN MISCONDUCT TO DEFENSE, THE JURY, THE DEFENDANT, I SAW ON TH-cam SHE JUST CALLED MISTRIAL IN ANOTHER TRIAL INVOLVING I BELIEVE AN OFFICER...NOT SUPER SURE BUT SHE DID IT. SHE IS SO BIASED.
She must have another case coming down the line that she wants. I’ve never seen a judge rush so much in my life.
She should be disbarred !
She had a conflict of intrest in this case.
She should have recused herself like Karens Attorneys suggested!
She was a former defense lawyer, defended Chris Albert.
Aunty Beg (judge) when Chris Albert was charged with manslaughter, it was Auntie Bev's brother who represented Chris. The Albert Kids refer to the Judge as Auntie Bev.
😳 What?!
@@colleenfletcher2550
Wait...so the mere mention of driving by an ex girlfriends house makes you kill your boyfriend...? What an absolute crock 🙄
No one knows why she did it. She’s just evil I guess. There’s no reason big enough. Let him there to freeze.
Aggravated by the fact that he was texting Jen while Karen was trying to stop him from going in the house.Jealosy does wonder.
@@maanmohammad8459 Karen and John have dated years ago, they broke up and nobody died! It’s ridiculous to suggest that suddenly, it was a jealous life-or-death situation. Pff no way, that’s bs.
@@stevenprice6957 That’s a conspiracy theory. Karen had no motive
They were known to argue a lot when sauced up, so
who the heck knows what they could of been fighting about if at all.
You’re a cop. There are cops in your yard. You never come outside to investigate. GTFOH!
And his excuse was he didn’t want to get in the way of the investigation
Exactly who is dum enough to believe that! and its your friend thats dead out there, come on how many of us would stay in the house and not go outside? He was told not to go out there! Not even bring a blanket nothing? GUILTY
💯💯
Exactly, and I hope the jury doesn't forget this!
And not ONE neighbor had a ring camera or other security cameras? That’s unbelievable!!
Can't wait for cross examination
I know the snarky defense attorney will be trying his best. But too late. Guilty as charges.
@@kayvee9094 LOL the only people are guilty are these corrupt Boston cops and their family. You people are so funny. The guy looks like he got jumped. Not tapped with a car and landing in a foot of snow on grass.
@@kayvee9094Keep dreaming. Defense is tearing up those witnesses and they haven’t even begun.
@@notsorryyouretriggeredWishful thinking....
Defense has proven nothing concrete
@@valiakloeppel7252They don’t have to! Not to mention the defense’s case HASN’T even started!
This guy is so nervous, WHY? Why does this judge give defense so much attitude.... theyre doing their job, right? Nothing about this whole trial feel right and/or just.
You’ve got to admit that the defense team is pretty slimy, though. Jackson sounds like a yapping little dog every time he opens his mouth.
He just about has all the skin licked off his lips
You can hear him tho! When lally has something you can tell lol he takes odd breath like in the middle of words. I don't the defense is slimy, they're doing their job! From what I can see better than anyone from Canton in this case so far! Witnesses included! No hate here just telling it how I see it!
All lally does is ask how everyone drove where they sat how the left the house and what they drank
@@user-wu2qb8ky9jI bet he will be glad when this is over 💁🏼♀️
Matt McCabe’s hand holding those texts he sent was sure SHAKING during cross!!
Why is the judge being so weird about not explaining the exhibits?
Everything about this trial is weird imo
Not stating the legal grounds for exceptions, the way exhibits are being intro’d and marked with sidebars, her finishing the lawyers line of questioning if she overrules( ex. Did you see that? Do you know that?) apologizing to jurors clearly blaming the defense (I’ve only ever seen judges completely take the blame even when it’s the lawyers that are bungling time) allowing Lally to ask redundant questions over and over to each witness, half days, off days are so disjointed and on and on…
It’s week 3 and not a single piece of evidence has been admitted to prove guilt of the defendant, no experts, medical examiner…that’s wild. I feel so bad for the jurors that are not getting paid/away from their families for this sham trial
Judge is 100% biased
@@DamnitDana "Do you know that?" I even hate the way she says it
One thing is True, These people drink and drive!
yet they are all over Karen because she had been drinking?
Yes, and they drink with their kids, which is weird.
@@kathleen9768really weird
@@willy131997sounds like they all LIVE & DIE BY DOUBLE STANDARDS! 😒
Under age kids. Don't forget that
WHEN YOU GET A NEW PHONE, TO GET RID OF EVIDENCE.
YOU MIGHT BE GUILTY
& YOU MIGHT BE ST*PID BECAUSE YOUR SENTENCE MAKES ZERO SENSE.
Major witnesses always left for cross until the following day. So they have weekend or nights to be prepared. Have you noticed ?
I noticed
judge is not being fair at all
Bev= corrupt- the defense isn’t leaving the witness in the dark - he needs glasses and the court room is dark
Yep
And so the jury can think about what the prosecution brought out all weekend...seems awfully coincidental
sounds like you may ave to dodge the drunks in that town....under age drinking...cops drinking and driving......I guess the laws don't apply to their families
If your related to cops
Police go to bars and drink their asses off after work and then drive drunk going home. .When was the last time you heard of a cop getting a ticket for drunk driving?
When the Bailiff says , Here ye, hear ye, God save the Commonwealth of Massachusetts I finally know why. 🙄 it’s totally corrupt!
Theatrical
Traditional
@opaqueblackhole where else? I watch a lot of trials and have only heard those words spoken in other countries. Definitely not in AZ. I'm not being an ass, just actually curious.
@@Piat65 just like Jen McCabe
At this point I think God would like to be excluded from this narrative.
This dude can’t get his lies together on this stand and that nervous laughter is very telling! So he told them to say John never came into the house! Case closed! She’s innocent! 🤷🏽♀️
He's nervous, laughing because he isn't used to remembering lies , fabricating stories like the others.
Lying under oath is perjury.
He’s smug too when he suck’s his cheeks in and purses his lips. He’s lying then.
Karen testified case closed, If you still think Karen's innocent seek medical help for your conspiracy paranoia
When did Karen testify?
She has not been on the stand.
Why is the prosecutor afraid of the microphone? 😒
I can't hear a word he's sayin!
He is scared maybe the mic was part of the conspiracy.
I know it’s unbelievable nor is he projecting he’s whispering into a low mic…
He is failing 😢
It seems like he doesn’t believe his own story… Wonder why🙄
I thought it was just me
Does anyone know why Jen McCabe didn't go outside to show John which house when they were texting back and forth and he was asking, "here?" Why didn't she go outside to get him? 🤔
@TracyB-dn7jy I thought the same as you, and also thought, why didn't she ring him?
Because it’s cold and snowing and John was an adult?
@@katiekoo16What difference does either one of those make? They were out drinking in the cold.
@@ladylovebug007 The OP asks why Jen McCabe didn’t go outside, I offered a not unreasonable answer. I think there are lots of reasons why she didn’t go back outside that are not incriminating. Maybe she just couldn’t be bothered, maybe she was in the middle of a conversation, using the bathroom, didn’t think it was necessary etc etc.
Because it was freezing outside. Smh
I can tell in the way he answered several questions that he does not like Karen even before he passed.
Well, if she blamed your family for something, you probably wouldn’t like her, either.
As I said, I can tell he didn't like her before all this happened.
@@careykelley7099 Neither did Jen…
I don’t like liars either.
Jen had socio path eyes
Good thing Matt McCabe didn't drop a glass of wine on the couch just before he left and then got home and texted Brian Albert.
"Did you clean it up?"
That would of been Hell on earth.
Tell them the guy never went in the house.
Why did he need to take pics of msp in neighborhood at the Asian house?
😂😂
@@LeannaMurphy-mx7zywell alot of people also believe Albert's butt dial is suspicious but if he wanted to lie he could of stated he just wanted to talk to Higgins and just hung up when Higgins didn't answer. There's no reason Brian couldn't of said he was watching TV that nite and was just bored and wanted to chat with his friend since he knew Higgins was going to be up since Higgins went to the police station. It would of been a better excuse than the butt dial.
Yeah brilliant
Seriously- in the middle of chaos, she googles “how long to die in the cold” oook 👀 👌🏼
Karen must have screamed JEN JEN JEN JEN JEN HOS LONG TO DIE IN COLD JEN JEN JEN 😂 These people are trippin. Covering up something for sure.
Karen asked her to, she wasreally hoping he was dead and couldn't tell the truth.
@@65cj55 Karen asked her to at 2:27am when the phone logs show the first search? Lol
@@DiscipleOfChrist920 It’s a shame that Technology doesn’t seem to work in Canton! Phones that answer and make calls by themselves, 360 app records an hour of activity that never happened and now google searches appear to have been made 4 hours earlier…. Crazy coincidences in Canton!🤔🙄
@@soude85 They are crazy… if you’re a conspiracist who agrees with Turtlebag (or whatever ridiculous name he goes by).
Ans life is on the line n this judge just keeps apologizing to the jury like the defense is wrong for there lengthy cross that’s ridiculous
The flippn witness could not read or see like wtf is the defense supposed to do
Yes and she is very condescending to the defense in front of the jury and many times doesn't let them recross...
Yeah, I’ve never heard a judge apologize before for that. 😂
The drinking wasn’t in the midst of their weight loss???? Lolol
She said it was a "crazy " diet 😂😂😂
@@sarahglenn298 to go along with the ‘ crazy’ lies
@@sarahglenn298 I’ll say, any diet that doesn’t include pizza is unthinkable 🤣😂🍕
If you paid attention it was specifically stated that instead of their usual beer, they were drinking other things like scotch or vodka because of that diet. Pay attention
@@tonys4396 lolololol!!! Oh ok! Sounds like a healthy family on a healthy diet…. How about everyone stop drinking and maybe they will at least have their memories back 🙄
Where was Chloe sleeping? How could Jenn enter the Albert house/bedroom without Chloe barking?
If the house was left unlocked and people entered freely, Chloe would be used to it.
Now I have to think back to the question, whether Caitlin took Chloe when she left…
@@soude85they swear she didn’t but I think they did after whatever happened, happened…no way Chloe wouldn’t be barking at all of that activity outside
Jen didn't RECALL!! Funny that eh??
Look at that taillight @6:04:00. Take a good look at it because the condition of that taillight in that picture is what completely destroys the credibility of all of the prosecution's witness testimony. Anyone who's ever driven behind someone with a broken taillight lens such as this, especially after dark, knows full well that it would be blatantly obvious there was something remarkably out of place about that taillight's operation. The light coming from it isn't red, it's unfiltered and it's much brighter. Or it's completely blacked out if the bulb, itself, is damaged in the process. Either way, you'd remember that detail because it would be so obvious.
Not a single witness recalled that, though. Not even the three individuals parked directly behind the SUV at 12:10 am. What's even more telling about that is that witness for the prosecution, Richard D'Antuono and one of the individuals parked directly behind the SUV after prosecution claims this damage occurred, testified to not noticing any damage at all and he did not testify to there being a blatantly obvious bright white glow or blackout that should have been easily observed if that taillight was in that condition at that time. Even at a passing glance, you are definitely going to observe this level of damage as being obvious and you'd definitely have no problem recognizing and remembering it as such.
So how many times do we have to call bullshit on prosecution's case? Kudos to most of the witnesses for not wanting to perjure themselves to entertain prosecution's wild theories but what's the point of calling witnesses that have nothing at all to add to the case? Nobody sees anything, nobody knows anything, a large man dies in a very busy yard in front of a moderately busy street and nobody, not a single individual, sees him? Bullshit.
Too long to read but are you connected to the turtle kid
How about when Jenn testified that when they got to John’s house to look for him Karen said to her and Kerri look look I broke my tail light and the three of them go to the back of the suv and look at the tail light and she saw that pieces were missing and testified that the pieces missing are the ones depicted in the pictures shown yet when they show video of them in the driveway before they go in the house she said she walked straight into the garage and you can clearly see that they never once went to the back of Karen’s suv not even Karen herself looked at the taillight. Clearly wasn’t on her mind as much as Jenn claimed just watch it it’s unreal
@@nicoledangredo535 - I'm finding that a lot of what's being said by the witnesses doesn't really line up with the actual video evidence, however limited that is in this case.
All I can say from first-hand experience is that, when there's a taillight lens damaged to the extent shown in the images, you notice it. There's no "Oh, I wasn't paying attention!". You, by default, notice it.
@@stevenprice6957 - No, sir. I'm not a Libertarian looking to upgrade my cum sock with a Karen. Just calling it all how it's being presented.
IN A BLIZZARD? I wouldn't care one bit about a taillight .
She stated 5:52:37 Karen showed her the busted taillight at John’s before Roberts rushed them into the house. Video 6:06:04 shows she was in the garage before the others got to the taillight and there was no sign they discussed anything
Great catch!! 🧐
I noticed that too
You should work for the defense!
Lol..when Yennetti says, you would think this was my first trial..turns with that little grin..Judges face :)
Tell them the guy never entered the house 😳 😳 😳 this trial is over locked sealed and delivered
100 percent
JEN TESTIFIED NOW CASE IS CLOSED. IF YOU STILL THINK KARENS INNOCENT SEEK TREATMENT FOR YOUR CONSPIRACY PARANOIA PSYCHOSIS
The defense is fighting, no doubt about that.
Can someone explain to me why there would be blood coming out of John's mouth when doing CPR? I just do not understand how his injuries and "only a broken tail light" go together....
I thought the same thing
Ms. “What if anything Bredehoft” Lally.
Wow this Judge those texts are extremely important..some one needs to step in..she needs stopped.
Karen isn’t smiling now
Why was Karen Read hysterical at 4:53am if she had no idea what happened? I can’t reconcile that.
Me either
Exactly!
She literally told people that she must have hit him. Is that what you say when you show up to a scene like that? Why did she pick that specific, particular explanation when she saw the victim? If there was no chance that she hit him - as she starting saying as soon as she lawyered up - why would she tell people that at the scene?
Agree
Once Jennifer called her back and told her that they had seen her outside the home ... Karen had to go into crazy mode, she knew the gig was up. Jennifer called her out on the lie Karen told of leaving John at the Waterfall. I think Jennifer knocked a nail in Karen's coffin and Karen knows it - hence the death stare!
Can’t wait for trooper Procter to testify
I think he'll take the 5th.
Im sure he has already been re homed.
@BCScann 😂😂😂
Jen told the truth case closed Karen hit him, , . By the way if your innocent you don't run around frantically yelling and telling others you HIT HIM, get help for your conspiracy paranoia quickly
Thanks court TV LOVE YOUR COVERAGE OF THE KARAN REED STORY
Damn I’m starting to think she accidentally did hit him, definitely not on purpose but Jen’s texts to John to see where he is until 12:40ish is pretty clear he wasn’t in the house
Matt McCabe “tell them the guy never went in the house “.
Were any of their phones taken after the crime though? Could have easily deleted things.
Group chat… say the guy didn’t come in the house
THE JUDGE?!!!!! Omg so corrupt how is she allowed to be the judge in this.
Who the hell keeps coughing
And the judge never ask that person to stop… have you noticed!
@@snobbybeauty2210 she didn't ask them 2 stop because it's COUGHING not yelling.
@BoxerClover coming out of Covid era, it's a tight stuffy room with minimal ventilation, with the fan moving the air. They need a cough drop or asked to leave. It's probably meant to be distracting
It’s such a shame that Technology doesn’t seem to work in Canton! Phones that answer and make calls by themselves, the 360 app records an hour of activity that never happened and now google searches appear to have been made 4 hours earlier….
Crazy coincidences in Canton!🤔🙄
BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT!!!!!!
Karen Read - NOT GUILTY!!!!!
Lol.
I am believing she is 💯guilty!
Lots of reasonable doubt! Not blaming ANYONE! Poor JO no one remembers anything! And when they do I do doubt THEM. This whole thing hurts my heart! I don't doubt them for any other reason other than THEIR OWN behavior.
🙏 John Okeefe and family 🤍
Guilty
What is Jen McCabe smokin? Just heard her Testify, that Karen, told her, John didn't come home last night, we got into a fight, and I left him at the Waterfall. Are You Kidding Me?
Heather Morrow, saw a man and a Woman in Karen's SUV that was at a Stop Sign across from Heather, Ryan Nagel and Ricky.
Ricky let Karen go 1st. So they pulled up behind Karen's SUV which stopped by the mailbox, with Ricky stopping closer to the driveway.
Ricky's truck has a lift on it. So when Ryan's sister came out of the Albert's house, they spoke with the door of the truck open, blocking their view of Karen's passenger side door.
That is when John entered the Albert's home. Karen pulled up a little bit, waiting for John to text, it was Ok. Ricky, Ryan and Heather Pull Off, going around Karen's SUV with the Interior light On, Both Ryan and Heather, saw 1 person inside that SUV, a Female with Long Hair.
So now Jen, Tell Me Again, that Karen said she left John at the Waterfall Bar. Exactly! Drop the Mic 🎤
Yes Karen was lying..surprise surprise.
It’s all in the eyes. Jen has crazy eyes
Matt McCabe “oh my god”
As in “im fd “
@@LeannaMurphy-mx7zy Again with the eyes? Like I said, I hope you never serve on a Jury.
Well tong look at people in history.
You tell me.
When on the witness stand, the paramedics said the visibility was awful and they could not see very far in front of them until they saw the lights from the cop cars. When Karen and the other two gals were headed over to that house to look for John, this gal on the witness stand said Karen screamed "there he is"! How did she see him when the other two ladies could not? Because she knew he was there?
“Tell them the guy never came in the house”
yup.
I'm just very upset about this and I can tell you this firefighter if that's what he is should be ashamed of himself for lying
“Tell them the guy never went in the house “
You don’t need a plan of what to say if you’re telling the truth.
You also don’t whisper “oh my god” into the mic.
he was exasperated with the back & forth of both sides most likely.
Than he lacks self control.
That’s what happens in a trial.
Objection - Asked and answered...Objection...Asked and answered. Good grief...this Prosecutor needs to speak up. If I were a juror, I would be so fed up with the defense attorney constantly asking the same thing over and over and twisting words or the meaning of words around so he can ask the same thing yet again that i would be tuning him out every time he starts questioning anyone! I'm not on either side, just for the love of God....somebody start objecting...please. When you keep trying so hard to get the answer you need instead of the answer you, it's not the witness people will not trust, it's you.....
When someone is facing life in prison I think the defense should be able to ask anything that isn’t leading
@@nicoledangredo535 That's ridiculous.
@@mollykillarney2419 I’m sure you wouldn’t feel that way if you were on the hot seat
@@nicoledangredo535 Perhaps not. But at least I'd understand that that's 𝒏𝒐𝒕 how our courts work.
Im pretty sure most people understand that’s not how the law works and I don’t think Karen Really expects it to be different for her, the statement I made was solely my personal opinion if I were to put myself in her shoes. As previously stated, I think the defense should be able to ask any question that’s not leading the whiteness however I should’ve added within reason and not just assUMEd it was implied and that’s my fault. So to rephrase my opinion, I think the defense should be able to ask any question to a whiteness if it’s non leading or argumentative, they have evidence to back up the claim, and it helps them in proving any point they have or leads to them proving any point they have to the jury. More so if said questions have the potential to raise reasonable doubt in the jury’s mind. Especially in the case where life in prison the sentence if found guilty again this is just my opinion of what I would want if I were her. However I hope I never find myself in such a horrific situation where this is something I have to worry about.
Hos long to die in cross examination?
not sure. i'll know more when "i hit him!"
🏆
If her attorneys are wise they would be discussing a plea deal right now.
They are having too much fun slowly dismantling each witness.
Who do you think have them those text messages???
after friday i was wondering if they might broach the subject w/karen this weekend.
Then you are in for a big awakening this week!
Bev is flipping nuts!!!!!
There's times that I think she's about to explode and scream "FASTER" to the defense, especially the taller attorney.
The judge is always trying to rush the defense!
I just witnessed her rushing the prosecutor😂😂
How many times does the judge need to tell the defense to stop asking the same question over and over. I get it, Jackson thinks the points he makes in his cross will be stronger if he asks the same question 15 different ways, but guess what, attorneys aren’t permitted to ask a question more than once. Hence the objection “ASKED AND ANSWERED!” Lilly should be objecting, but he’s not, so the judge has to step in and say “Stop wasting these jurors’ time!” And then he does it all over again with the next point that he wants to drive home. Sorry, Jackson, your strategy is obvious, but it’s against the rules!
@@regularcustomer656
She is bending backward to accommodate the defence,yet to most people here she is biased towards the prosecuters.Both Jackson and Yanetti were badgering the witnesses,and Lally didn't object.I think on purpose.If he is so sure of his case,he is letting them play their theatricals which will only alienate the juries against them.
Defense lawyers are jerks
@@maanmohammad8459 I agree! I also don’t understand why a lot of the comments say that the judge is biased against Karen read and her defense attorneys! The judge allowed the defense to enter into evidence the underage videos of Colin Albert it blew my mind! But they say she’s bias 😂🤦🏻♀️
How did this woman become a judge?! She is bar-none the most biased and unprofessional legal professional that I have ever witnessed, even throws a small temper tantrum at ( 3:03:01 ). Is there some type of recourse for these phenomenally patient defense attorneys and their client Karen Reed? I shudder at the thought of what this judge does while sitting on cases that are not publicized for the whole world to witness via Live Court CAM. Ultimately, the people in Boston need to get to the polls and throw this one OUT!
i noticed that tantrum
I feel terrible for John O'Keefe and his family. The people he was around were cold and narcissistic. I can't believe these other families! The way they acted after this traumatic event, it's just sickening.
Well his family is stupid enough to think this girl who loved their son, helped raise their grandkids killed their son they are blinded and can't see the truth
The same girl that bounced 20 min after arriving back to John’s once all the family and kids were there because she couldn’t look them in the eye! She doesn’t care about those kids at all! Went to her parents house and never contacted them again.
@@briannavanderpool4703 yes, that's the one. 😊
Wasting so much Time defense lawyers nonsense text
Quit grasping
BS because Jen never told anyone she hit him at first, told the police they didn’t know what happened and no one had seen him. She would have for sure told the cops Karen thinks she hit him immediately!!!
That's not true.
@@65cj55 How is that not true? Have you been following this? The whole thing up until now, has said that no one knew anything or saw anything and suddenly Jen said she told her she hit him supposedly.. or was Jen telling her she hit his CAR in the driveway, which she did, as she backed out to go look for him.
@@michellestover2114 KR’s PREVIOUS ADMISSIONS (EXAMPLES):
1. WBZ-TV Report 3 Feb 2022 (on YT) regarding the court hearing on 2 February 2022 (where KR faced the charges relating to JO’s death and was released on $50k bail) and upon questioning (as verified by the above report on YT) she told LE:
- She dropped JO off because she was having stomach issues.
- She made a 3 point turn in the road and left.
- She did not see JO enter the house (this contradicts her interviews a year later).
- Therefore confirming she did take JO to the Alberts house in her SUV (verifying the sightings of her SUV out the front are true).
- She first observed her broken taillight on that morning and did not know how she broke it (this contradicts the allegation it was due to hitting JO’s SUV on that morning - if she had hit JO’s SUV at around 5:00 am she would have known exactly why her taillight was broken and said so if it were true (story that’s also come out later).
- Confirmed she had said at the time of finding JO: “I hit him” - 4 times.
- Both her and Yannetti (representing her) were in the court and accepted the above with no denials.
- It’s been said that Yannetti had referred to it as being an accident when speaking to the media outside the Stoughton District Court and had managed to negotiate a plea deal of 16 months but KR rejected it (didn’t want to do jail time).
2. Boston 25 News on 8 August 2023 (on YT) - Parents interview whereby her father says she told him (shortly after JO was found and as verified by the above interview on YT) that:
- “Dad I think I struck something”.
- “I remember backing up and hitting something”.
This is obviously referring to hitting JO, otherwise if she was referring to (allegedly) hitting his SUV she would know and say that, and would not be using the word “something”.
KR was probably quite/very intoxicated. We know her and JO didn’t eat at the WF and there is no mention of them eating at CFM either. Possibly no food in her stomach since lunch time at work (approximately 12 hours before) and we know she’s loving the alcohol (she stole a drink from one bar to take it to the other).
THE ABOVE ARE IN TOTAL CONTRADICTION OF THE DEFENSE AT THIS TRIAL AND THE CONSPIRACY THEORY.
Also it was only after a year later when the state upgraded the charges to second degree murder, that the whole alleged conspiracy theory was formulated and began, and also at that time she began alleging that she saw JO go into the Albert’s house (which she had never said before).
@@michellestover2114 KR’s PREVIOUS ADMISSIONS (EXAMPLES):
1. WBZ-TV Report 3 Feb 2022 (on YT) regarding the court hearing on 2 February 2022 (where KR faced the charges relating to JO’s death and was released on $50k bail) and upon questioning (as verified by the above report on YT) she told LE:
- She dropped JO off because she was having stomach issues.
- She made a 3 point turn in the road and left.
- She did not see JO enter the house (this contradicts her interviews a year later).
- Therefore confirming she did take JO to the Alberts house in her SUV (verifying the sightings of her SUV out the front are true).
- She first observed her broken taillight on that morning and did not know how she broke it (this contradicts the allegation it was due to hitting JO’s SUV on that morning - if she had hit JO’s SUV at around 5:00 am she would have known exactly why her taillight was broken and said so if it were true (story that’s also come out later).
- Confirmed she had said at the time of finding JO: “I hit him” - 4 times.
- Both her and Yannetti (representing her) were in the court and accepted the above with no denials.
- It’s been said that Yannetti had referred to it as being an accident when speaking to the media outside the Stoughton District Court and had managed to negotiate a plea deal of 16 months but KR rejected it (didn’t want to do jail time).
2. Boston 25 News on 8 August 2023 (on YT) - Parents interview whereby her father says she told him (shortly after JO was found and as verified by the above interview on YT) that:
- “Dad I think I struck something”.
- “I remember backing up and hitting something”.
This is obviously referring to hitting JO, otherwise if she was referring to (allegedly) hitting his SUV she would know and say that, and would not be using the word “something”.
KR was probably quite/very intoxicated. We know her and JO didn’t eat at the WF and there is no mention of them eating at CFM either. Possibly no food in her stomach since lunch time at work (approximately 12 hours before) and we know she’s loving the alcohol (she stole a drink from one bar to take it to the other).
THE ABOVE ARE IN TOTAL CONTRADICTION OF THE DEFENSE AT THIS TRIAL AND THE CONSPIRACY THEORY.
Also it was only after a year later when the state upgraded the charges to second degree murder, that the whole alleged conspiracy theory was formulated and began, and also at that time she began alleging that she saw JO go into the Albert’s house (which she had never said before).
These people LOVE to drink
All these people are arrogant as hell. Shameful
Horrible people
KR’s PREVIOUS ADMITTANCES TO HITTING JO, ETC (EXAMPLES):
1. WBZ-TV Report 3 Feb 2022 (on YT) regarding the hearing on 2 February 2022 (where KR faced the charges relating to JO’s death and was released on $50k bail):
- She dropped JO off because she was having stomach issues.
- She made a 3 point turn in the road and left.
- She did not see JO enter the house (this contradicts her interviews a year later).
- Therefore confirming she did go to the house with her SUV.
- She first observed her broken taillight in the morning and did not know how she broke it (this contradicts the allegation it was due to hitting JO’s SUV on that morning).
- Confirmed she had said at the time of finding JO: “I hit him” - 4 times.
- Yannetti is there representing her and accepts the above with no denials.
2. Boston 25 News on 8 August 2023 - Parents interview whereby her father says she told him (shortly after JO was found) that:
- “Dad I think I struck something”.
- “I remember backing up and hitting something”.
THE ABOVE ARE IN TOTAL CONTRADICTION OF THE DEFENSE AT THIS TRIAL AND THE CONSPIRACY THEORY.
* The truth never changes nor does it need a good memory *
MATT RUNNING OUT OF COURT
Anxiously waiting for the tough questions from counsel on Tuesday.
Hopefully Aunt Vev will allow the defense to do its job.
Do its job? Shes a killer. You conspiracy theorists are nuts
They don't have court till Tuesday....I'm bummed
Don't count on it! 😡
@@loriduffecy9205 Thanks, I forgot.👍
Thanks. Didn’t know it was until Tuesday! 👍🏼
Could they have found a more biased judge? She isn’t even trying to hide it!
You mean a judge that doesn't allow the defense to make a joke of the legal system.
Bev is a joke of the legal system
It will all come out after the trial. They’re going to roast her!!!
This judge is a quack.
I do believe she’s not guilty, but I still want to know why Karen went to Jen Mccabes house to ask for help? Why didn’t Karen go straight to 34 Fairview if that’s where she dropped him off last? Does anyone know??? That’s the only part that throws me off..
Karen wasn’t friends with them and had never been to 34 Fairview. The connection was John knew Jen McCabe for 10 years but it was Jen’s sisters house (Nicole Albert).
Karen didn’t even have Jen’s number in her phone bc they weren’t friends.
When Karen found out John was missing, she had to wake up John’s niece to call Jen as she had Jen’s number.
Instead of telling Karen the address (34 Fairview), Jen told Karen to go to her (Jen’s) house, then Jen convinced Karen to go back to 1 Meadows (John’s house) to make sure John wasn’t there, then finally they get to 34 Fairview around 6AM.
Karen originally called Jen (from the niece’s phone) around 4:50AM, meaning Jen caused an hour delay for Karen to get to 34 Fairview.
@@selmeb1291 wow!! Thanks for replying. Makes me sick to think of the delay. Jen is evil.
@@amandameekhael she really is, dark soul. She’s also the one who googled “hos long to die in snow” at 2:27AM (hours before John was found), deleted that search then did it again at 6;30am (after John was found) and said it was bc Karen told her to do it. This woman is sick.
MS and alcohol do not mix. Alcohol can cause issues with balance, decision making/thinking and a propensity to feel more intoxicated than someone without MS. (Speaking from experience). It explains a lot.
yup. my cousin had it. he wouldn't even drink champagne at his wedding. didn't care! still a joyous day!
Jennifer did a great job on the stand IMO
Man I would have my cars parked in that garage on those cold winter days.These children have had such great loss.I pray they get the therapy and healing they will need for years to come.🙏😘
Such great defense ..she is very lucky to have them
Love Jackson he's a GREAT Attorney
I LOVE Yanneti! Bev is so mean to him. And the defense period.
He messes up his own mess,and he is a good attorney?😂😂
@@maanmohammad8459 I wonder who you are, after reading your comments..?🧐
@@soude85
What does matter who am I?It didn't matter to me who are the ones I replied to.
I have a question, if I may, firstly, and unless the deceased, (with the greatest of respect), was really drunk, how could he have ended up in a position where he got hit by the tail light and more importantly, how would the driver / car been able to know where the deceased was positioned AND/OR, been in a position to build up enough speed to create a supposedly fatal knock down??? My point is, how would the defendant have known what to aim for?
exactly. no evidence of all of that yet ha.
She wouldn't have.
And you don't have to be a medical examiner to come to the common sense conclusion that such impact would not have resulted in the victim being deceased, having 2 black eyes and scratch marks to the arm that looks more like an animal attack. How on earth do you kill someone with such force and only end up with a minor tail light crack? No bump on the vehicle, Nothing !!
The defence is going to completely destroy jen mccabe next week.
They probably quarreled in the car. He may have been bending over- She may not have known the extent of the impact. stumbled- & died from hypothermia- not the car impact Kinda like when when someone dies from getting punched in the face/ head.
No aiming but, I believe a plow hit him as well 😉
@TheJamesroy3 So they quarrelled IN the car and somehow her tailight broke as he bent down (for whatever reason), then she hit him and he ended up on the lawn? Not only that but there was no other damage to her vehicle and no tire marks on the lawn he ended up on.
Did you even take a second to think and use your brain before typing that fairytale?
Drinking game! Take 1 drink every time someone says “I don’t know “ or “I don’t remember” or “I don’t recall” and then you’ll be as drunk as this group is 😂 but don’t drink and drive like these cops seem to love to do.
What caused the gashes in his arm and the gash in the back of his head. JO has injuries on his arm his face and his skull. How is there not more damage on the car? It’s an impossibility.
Maybe POSSIBLY someone beat him up. Maybe the snow ghost
Joke's seriously
Someone did beat him.
If the dog had did that he would have marks all over hes arms ...The only person who knows what happened to John is John RIP 🙏 JOHN O ,KEEFE 🙏
@julieCarroll
John didn’t beat himself up, so no he is not the only one who knows what happened.
CLEANS PHONE, SELL HOUSE, GETS RID OF DOG HMMM 🤔
I watched testimony and they said that The dog got out and bit someone so they probably got sued and chose to get rid of the dog
I still believe Karen is guilty. I think she has a sneaky way about her. I still think she was so drunk that night. And yes she hit him. And he fell back and he wack his head on the curve and the car hit him so hard that the head lights scratched his arm. Or the broken glass scratches him when he fell.
"Would I visit her?" This girl is a piece of work!!! Karen is a STRONG person to sit calmly through this production. SMH
She is so strong that she did not show any emotion while one of the witnesses was almost crying(a few days back).So much for a boyfriend.
@@maanmohammad8459Karen is scrutinized no matter what she does! So much for JO being friends with MM & JM…so good they refer to him as the “guy!”
I began researching this case as I do many others in my free time. I had an unbiased mind and always try and side with the evidence. I have never in my life been witness to something like this. On day 12 of the trial the defense has already secured reasonable doubt and has also exposed a massive web of corruption inside this small Boston suburb. Colin Albert was/is at the center of the Canton coverup and is the person or one of several people who beat Boston Police officer John O’Keefe unconscious in the basement at 34 Fairview Rd (34 Fairview Rd was owned by Colin Albert’s uncle Brian Albert who is a retired Boston fugitive police officer and trained MMA fighter) and threw his body in the road.
My belief is that John O’Keefe was lured to this home and what was intended on being a simple fight/beatdown ended in John O’Keefe unconscious with severe head trauma, eyes swollen shut, broken nose, bleeding from his nose and mouth. John O’Keefe also had vomit on his pants. Not wanting to get 20 year old Colin Albert arrested, they took John’s body out through the basement hatch and threw him on the side of the road where unable to move John O’Keefe laid and froze to death until he was found later that morning by his girlfriend Karen Read.
The arrogance of these people is astonishing. The tampered evidence, destroyed evidence, false reports, undocumented police interviews, the fact the lead investigator was best friends with the owner of the house where the body was found, the fact they never even asked to search the house, the fact that 45 pieces of red tail light was not at the scene until days later when corrupt investigators had seized Karen Reads vehicle. I could list 1000 things that are wrong about this case!!
If you’re not watching this trial you should be!
This trial could be anyone of us. Karen Read had no way of knowing that she was interacting with a mega connected canton Massachusetts family that had bad intentions from the jump!! She is an innocent woman that is currently at the risk of losing her freedom for LIFE.
These people would have happily watched Karen Reads freedom be taken knowing she is innocent. Thanks to Online sleuths and bloggers like Aiden who used social media and online data to unveil the truth.
Her jaw is swinging every time she opens her mouth everyone of them should be tested
I’m amazed how they can remember so well during prosecutions questions and suddenly have amnesia when the defense questions them
Wow these witnesses just keep digging their holes deeper and deeper.
Find another hobby.She will be found guilty.
They don’t even lie well.
It has to be deep if you are going to bury someone with all the evidence for her guilt. Let's not forget the extra room needed for her huge overbite
@@teachertone1 🤣
5:35:02 Jen McCabe answers a question with multiple attempts after realizing she’s about to let something slip…in the 2nd attempt or sentence she says “I was researching”…
In prior testimony she says she and her husband get home around 2:15’AM she goes straight to bed and her husband eats a piece of cheese and joins her shortly after so that would take her timeline to roughly 2:27’AM (I can’t imagine eating a piece of cheese takes longer than 12 minutes) but coincidentally(????) that’s the EXACT time the meta data of her phone shows she googled “Hos long to die in the cold”
Then, while on the stand she says she was “researching basketball teams!?!” TF??? How convenient…IDK if that google search extraction includes basketball teams but it sure did show a damning piece of evidence against that whole family especially when you factor in her husband texting “say the guy never went inside” to said family!!!
I do believe there’s a saying among LE that they stand by and believe as if it came from the Bible….which is “ there’s no such thing as a coincidence”
What are the chances that an incriminating google search was made that coincides with an admission of that person saying she was researching something on her phone
Such a good point
Theory: what if John saw Collen drinking, a minor, and wasn’t down for that which made collen upset and cause an altercation… I mean clearly no one in the group seemed to care.
he seemed to love fighting based on those videos
Have they closed all of the Eyeglass World’s in that town?Nobody can see.🤓
They go blind trying to stall the trial from their many lies ! 😂
Before this ladys' testimony, I had absolutely no clue who killed this man. But now I am leaning toward Karen. Even though her sister is married to the man whos' yard Johnwas found deceased at, she certainly does not seem to me like someone who would go along with a cover-up.
Ok Patricia Albert.
Wait till cross and the info the feds got on the lies she told today!!!
The witness was 100% credible.
😳
You have proof in the testimony that Jen is lying. She said when they got to John's house, before they went in, Karen showed them the broken taillight. Yet on the video of it, thy walk in without going to the taillight. It's crazy how she can just sit there and lie and the prosecutions shows a video that disproves what she's saying. So think about that before you let Jen McCabe persuade you in to thinking Karen did it.
How did he get scratches on his arm under his clothing...where is his coat..shirt..?
100% chance it was the dog
@@LegendLength nope. no dog dna. only swine.
He didn’t wear a coat he had had on a sweater
She was never seen backing up her vehicle, if she hit him it must have been that she didnt even know but thought about how she didnt see him enter the house & then saw her tail light but her taillight was broken by hitting his car at his house when she went home. So prosecution claims she hit john with taillight but taillight got broken hitting his car at his house & they have the video which they will show. As far as them alledgedly finding taillight in street well her car was back at fairview so it could have fallen off or proctor put it there because their was no taillight pieces found at the scene by detectives.
I assume the tail light debris was covered from the snow plow
The black box on her Lexus proves that she did drive in reverse at that location at 24.2 mph for more than 60 feet . Moreover pieces of , the glass that John was holding
are embedded are embedded in her bumper and pieces of her vehicle are embedded in John.
@@bethmccrae2714really? When did they say that? 🤔
They didn’t it’s false.
@@bethmccrae2714 but the investigation was corrupt and evidence was planted 😐🤦♀️.
This would be the end all of doubt for sure
The more witnesses they put on the stand, the more slimier they get. Matt MCabe laughing and grinning and Jen McCabe using her MS to be seen as a victim 🙄
Matt was talking to himself.
wtf?
If she claims Karen said they got in a fight and she left him at the waterfall we would have to assume the fight happened at the waterfall and no one saw that happen… if she remembers a fight and 5 min later drove to Fairview why would she all the sudden not remember going there…..?????
My first question to Mrs Tooth Would be- why did you call the judge Beverly on friday? Youre on a first name basis with the judge trying this case?
Sidebar 100x a day is fkn annoying bro
The trial's not for anyone's entertainment ✌
If the judge was competent, there wouldn't be nearly as many sidebars!
But not one Overruled
Is day 14 cross examination posted yet ?
And the defense attorneys being so aggressive and badgering these witnesses isn’t a good look! They need to chill out!!
Trying to cry, but no tears
Who?
When Karen Reed and John didn’t come in the house, how come the McCabes didn’t call them or text them? She sent one text saying where are you and that’s it. If she thought they were outside and then they left she should’ve texted. “Why did you decide not to come in”, not “where are you?”
Clearly you didn't watch because she did text him multiple times. She also didn't have Karen's number.
@@lm20210she incessantly nags him to get there but then drops it completely and stops texting for several hours after him not arriving. Makes total sense
The last time she texted him was “where are you? “ That was probably when they were still trying to find the house. After that, she doesn’t text him until five in the morning. When she saw the car outside and they didn’t come in why didn’t she text him and say, “why aren’t you coming in” or “why did you leave? “ Also, if she was such friends with Karen Reed - Why didn’t she have her phone number?
@@Peony11111 she texted him more and said "hello"? a couple times afterwards. I have friends like that who flake and figured they changed their mind and went somewhere with their bf/gf. She wasn't friends with KR, they were friendly because of John. And when they met up they were friendly. As a mother of 4 kids who is always busy, not much in common with a single woman with no kids. Again lots of people I know are like this. Connected on social media but not by text
@@lm20210 if someone was supposed to show up and I saw them drive up to the house and they didn’t come in. I would definitely text them and say what happened why did you leave? if they never showed up then I probably wouldn’t have texted but seeing the car there and then they left, it’s just kinda suspicious to me. Plus, I don’t know I just found her whole testimony insincere and a little unbelievable. But that’s just me. I am keeping an open mind.
Why didn't Karen go into the party that night. Why was he going in alone. Couples do things together. Unless they were fighting.
Chloe was not in that house! There is no way you can’t recall a 80 pound German shepherd when busting in that bedroom room let alone walking in that front door. That dog would have been all over her. Shes lived in that house for 7 years. That is her territory! Lies
@brettmallo, 100% correct there is no way Chloe didn't know someone came into her house, let alone allow Jen to barge into the Albert's bedroom. Jen is so full of it.
@@colleenfletcher2550 I'd prefer we give her the award she deserves... One of those moon men from the MTV movie awards.
@@colleenfletcher2550
You realize that dogs know people that they see often.Right?
Thought exactly the same,...we have a really tame Labrador and she sleeps in my room. She barks when someone ENTERS the house at the FRONT door...does not wait until after the person has walked all through the house and up the stairs....then to the bedroom....Dogs hear that. You will definitely remember whether there was dog or not in that room!! Our lab even barks when it is just my parents or brother....
Does no one remember her lawyers initial statement outside Stoughton District Court when she was charged? Yanetti said it was an accident and there was no criminal intent. And then the story changed... They can literally admit it and her 'fans' go "nope!" LOL
@BeveledSpilchOnion I remember! 😉
WhenJackson was hired the story changed to a frame. What a joke.
I remember, and it's important to note that the statement you're referring to was published in the Boston Herald on 2/2/22; the writer characterized the incident as an accident, not Yannetti. Yannetti stated, "At 4:30 in the morning, my client is placing multiple calls to the to the victim, in this case to her boyfriend, wondering where he is why he hasn't come home. There was no criminal intent. This was not some random stranger. This was my client's boyfriend, somebody with whom she was in love." Yannetti is using the legal term ‘mens rea’ to emphasize the absence of knowledge or proof of criminal intent at that time. I wouldn’t label myself as a ‘fan,’ but observing the trial from a juror’s standpoint, I find significant doubt.
Read lovelittlemons reply and you will understand what was ACTUALLY said…….
She confessed all day every day… the case was over day 2 when the EMTs testified… this is the Karen Read clown show. She should a year for accidentally killing her boyfriend, and ten years for being evil about it…
If she was going to be the one to pick him up from the party, why didn’t she question where he was long before the following morning?
I wondered this too. How was he getting home.
She kept calling him and he would not answer and she kept going in and out of sleep and finally she drove over there early in the morning to see what was going on because that wasn't like him not returning her calls
@@Salon4312Ty
Im sure he told her he was getting a ride thats why she was frantic when she woke up and he wasn't home!
@@willy131997 And she woke really early on a Saturday morning if she was over there before daylight looking for him
Things are clearing up as they are kept simple and nondistracting. But im.warching on tv and cross hasnt happened yet.
Is this trial ever going to end?😮
Few more weeks.If you think this one is long check out Thugs trial, they are saying up to two years can u imagine? I couldn’t look at that group for 10 minutes much less two years.
KR’s attorneys have the patience of saints. I would not be as graceful with all the “sustained” BS she spews throughout this trial.
I have many, many doubts.
I didn't find a single bit of testimony believable today. Mr. Mccabe was extremely obnoxious, laughing at the lawyers and the jury. My thought is that Mr. McCabe is the Village Idiot.
Testimony from Jen...Jen...Jen was not the least bit credible. She just spouted word salad, with circumstantial soup.
Jen has no familiarity with the tooth.
@@notnow7973coke jaw tooth
Why was the floor dug out and removed ? It seems like a set up
The lawyers keep telling the witnesses to speak up, but it’s the lawyers I can barely hear
Idk if Karen hit or didn’t hit him but i do know I can tell a bunch of these witnesses are lying. Conflicting stories
& if/when their testimonies align people complain they're exactly the same. when a cultist's mind's made up there's rarely any turning back.
@@BoxerClover 👏 𝑫𝒂𝒎𝒏, BoxerClover, you got the clap-backs today! ♡︎
On the fence until today but now leaning towards guilty after listening to the testimony of Matt and Jen McCabe.
Same- seems KR got pissed off after Mccabe mention it’s near daughter’s friends house. Whom JO dated her mom briefly in the past
@@TeamUsaOneBut you notice they didn’t knock on Bella’s door… which means Jen made that part up just to give motive for Karen. They drove straight to Fairview. If that part was true, Karen would have stopped and knocked, but she didn’t believe John was out cheating.
@@amandameekhael
or she knew she hit something that night and knew where to look?
Agreeing they did terrible at interviewing for death investigation.
Adding: I know nothing other than the past 2 week trial coverage and I can’t make a decision yet on guilty or not guilty. So much doubt so far
After today's cross examination I suggest you jump back on the fence cause it doesn't look good for the prosecution.
@@hectornegron9155 Jen McCabe is a little fire cracker. She did well
Karen complaining about the kids then she shouldn’t have gotten involved with a guy that had two kids
JEN WAS ASKED TO GOOGLE HOW LONG IT TAKES TO DIE IN THE COLD. IF YOU STILL BELEIVE KAREN DIDNT "Hit HIM, THEN YOU NEED TO SEEK MEDICAL HELP FOR YOUR CONSPIRACY PARANOIA PSYCHOSIS 😮
She wasn’t with Jen at 2:20 a.m
Why haven't we heard her say it in any of those videos
2:20 Jen was by herself in her bedroom pacing
kAREN ASKED JEN TO GOOGLE THAT SO CALLED SMOKING GUN STATEMENT AND WAS HEARD ASKED THAT BY A FIRST RESPONDER EMT WHOM TESTIFIED TO IT, ALSO, FORENSICS WILL PROOVE THIS ANOMOLY IN THE PROSECUTIONS FAVOR . THE TECHNICAL FIELD ANAYLISIS WILL SOON PROOVE GOOGLE TIME STAMPS ARE NOT AS PERFECT AS FORENSIC SCIENCE . GOOGLE WILL BE PROOVEN IN ERROR WHEN ADVANCED FORENSIC COMPUTER EXPERTS EXPLAIN TECHNOLOGIES AND THERE FUNCTIONS. EXPERTS WILL TESTIFY THE ANOMOLY IN COURT BY THE PROGRAMMER HIMSELF😅 MAN YOUR TURTLEFIED STEAK
kAREN ASKED JEN TO GOOGLE THAT SO CALLED SMOKING GUN STATEMENT AND WAS HEARD ASKED THAT BY A FIRST RESPONDER EMT WHOM TESTIFIED TO IT, ALSO, FORENSICS WILL PROOVE THIS ANOMOLY IN THE PROSECUTIONS FAVOR . THE TECHNICAL FIELD ANAYLISIS WILL SOON PROOVE GOOGLE TIME STAMPS ARE NOT AS PERFECT AS FORENSIC SCIENCE . GOOGLE WILL BE PROOVEN IN ERROR WHEN ADVANCED FORENSIC COMPUTER EXPERTS EXPLAIN TECHNOLOGIES AND THERE FUNCTIONS. EXPERTS WILL TESTIFY THE ANOMOLY IN COURT BY THE PROGRAMMER HIMSELF😅 MAN YOUR TURTLEFIED STEAK