Good Talk -- Did The Real Pierre Poilievre Just Stand Up?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2023
- After weeks, even perhaps months, of being pummelled by the opposition, the media and Goopd Talk, Justin Trudeau got a bit of a break this week. Pierre Poilievre found his actions under the microscope, and to many, it didn't look good. Bruce and Chantal are all over this on Good Talk this week and they sure don't hold back.
www.siriusxm.ca/TheBridgeCA
Sign up to the Buzz Newsletter:
www.nationalnewswatch.com/sub...
Hey you three, Liberals are done 😂
Yes, and biggest worry is Pierre is going to defund!! Good bye free money!!😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
So disappointing to listen to this episode. It speaks volumes about the moderator, panel and the theme of this “discussion”! So Pollieviere’s straight-up, confident statements won’t be appreciated by many Canadians according to this trio? My goodness, we have endured eight years and counting of utter incompetence, ethical violations, pathetic narcissism and contempt for Canada’s institutions. And somehow Pollieviere is a potential liability that should make Canadians see the Trudeau Liberals as a not so bad option? C’mon, are you really that stretched for a subject theme?
And this panel talks about Trudeau's failure ALL the time. This discussion is about PP lying, misleading, being rude, and lacking political judgment. He doesn't get a free pass because Trudeau has screwed up on many occasions.
Thats essentially accurate. YOu do realize POllievre was a cabinet minister IN govenrment right? The guy has ethical violations and has never even been PM.
@@mikearchibald744bullshit
Yes unsubscribing to msm bs
Actually clicked on this podcast with optimism..first time to hear it..from the first question I knew Mansbridge was carrying the CBC liberal bias with him to the podcast. Only in a delusional, hypnotized country would Trudeau still be in office.
Most Canadians are just happy to have a leader answer a question.
Even if he lies... Yeah, I'll pass on that.
@@Nytecrawler2010 There were no lies. Park your bias, open your ears.
@@EdAb thats a problem to the left. Their Jin jitsu of words is off the charts. Um Um Um ....ur ur Umm.....
That young reporter posed her question to Pierre in an overtly accusatory fashion that was basically saying that he was irresponsible. She was obviously the aggressor and he was left with the only option to correct her errors and defend himself. Chantal, you are completely off the mark to make your sexist comments.
@@JulietMartin2022…exactly
Activism, not journalism. They all should be ashamed.
Chantell, your description of Pierre is what the majority of Canadians see in Trudeau.
No it's not. Poilievre is a liar, flat out liar. Rude, arrogant liar.
💯%!!!!!!! 💙💙💙👏👏👏👏👏👏
First 10 seconds into the show and I have to say... there has Not been a free pass given in my mind to the opposition. Oh my word. If anyone has been given a free pass over the last number of years it's the current government. Check the viewership numbers of the major Canadian broadcasters, they are down substantially, largely as a result of the free passes and bias demonstrated in their reporting. Hardball loaded questions for the opposition and pure fluff for the incumbents.
yawn
Trudeau has gotten so many free passes... amazing he has remained in office...
These people need to shake their head…free pass..ya right..I agree the only ones getting a free pass are the Liberals and the NDP…
He did. There is a carbon tax in it.
Not an argument. @@nilanperera4774
Peter are you being paid by the Liberal government. Also Pierre Poilievre handled that reporter like a pro and maybe she should go back to journalism school.
Canada is going down the drain with liberal policies and all you appear to care about is what? A stupid question deserves the answer given.
So where are the conservatives polices on anything? More concerned with tearing it all down rather than supporting any worthwhile. Especially the environment.
@@spotty67 they are the opposition. Their job is to oppose
Their policies will be revealed in due election time
@@spotty67 yep, trump play book, dirty.
This silly debate in this video is the reason why the majority of Canadians have no respect for the media anymore.
I wish I could give your post more thumbs up.... so here👍👍👍👍👍
@@Melodyworld100totally
My major problem was the "Fact check" that was actually false. I got notifications from CTV saying "Under the assumption it's terrorism"
I would like to hear P. MANS...... PERSONAL THOUGHTS ON HOW THAT INTERVIEW WENT IN HIS ESTIMATION I WOULD NEVER WATCH THOSE TWO AGAIN JUST Disg....... hopefully the pay cheques will take a big fall season.
Because they aren't bashing the left? The majority of Canadians are not far right extremists.
Is it a coincidence that the attention turns to Poilievre at the moment that the legacy media are notified that their subsidy is going to double?
You mean Postmedia? They got millions from the liberals over the past 9 years and line up every year with their hat out looking for more money.
The attention he is getting is deserved, has been for a long time but Postmedia propoganda and other media INCLUDING CBC have given him a free ride.
OUTRIGHT LYING! Attacking a journalist in a vindictive, childish manner, multiple lies. If JT was PP in this case, averting exactly as PP did, U think the media would be blowing up with attacks abs requests for JT to resign.
Each journalist gets $30,000 apparently
If I got paid a lot from my boss I'd say everything he or she wanted me to say as well.. like these three!
Is Chantal saying female reporters should be treated different than male reporters ? These three always paint FOX and other Conservative news outlets as Right Wing . I have never heard them refer to CNN , CBC , CTV or Global as Left Wing .
I'm a Conservative but I don't consider myself a Right Wing nut job .
Me too and I’m black, grew up in a conservative family!! I don’t even care if they call me a right-wing nut job! If that stands for common sense, hard workers, balanced budgets, parents in charge of their kids, decency, family values, etc I’ll proudly be called that!!💙💙💙💙💙
If you were a true conservative. You would have described yourself as a progressive conservative
You seem to be in denial if you think a conservative these days is not a right wing nutjob especially now that white Christian nationalists have taken over all the conservative political parties in Canada from provincial to federal.
Yeah you can see why Canadians have lost faith and interest in main stream media who gives softball questions to liberals and do hit pieces on Pierre.
Would be awesome to be reminded of journalistic integrity but that doesn’t seem like it’s coming back in fashion anytime soon
Criticizing the leader of the opposition, especially after a colossal fuck up, is not a hit piece. Sorry you're so sensitive that criticism of a politician hurts you so deeply.
So you think Postmedia is the ONLY trustworthy mainstream media in Canada?
I used to respect Peter. I will stop watching a show with left wingnut
Same
Pierre Poilievre has every reason to have contempt for the Canadian Press. He's sick and tired of the loaded questions and the extreme bias coming from the subsidized left-wing legacy media. At the same time, in spite of Trudeau's many failures, scandals, corruption and egregious behaviors, the media defends him. So the answer is 'NO' Mansbridge. It is Trudeau that continues to get a free pass. In fact, that's the only reason Trudeau is still Prime Minister.
I'm so sick of not being able to trust the media. I'm happy to see a politician not scared to answer a question and to call these reporters out on their bs
You know both sides are subsidized right?
@@GronminWhat are the media outlets in Canada that are "the other side"?
It was a straight question that he had no answer for.
@@lesilluminations1 The question was "do you think it's responsible to..." and was based on something he did not say. I would therefore say it wasn't a question but a veiled accusation
Chantal Hebert: "The PM is not getting enough time off"
I say Justin Trudeau should be given 52 weeks off to save Canadians from his disastrous agenda and woke nonsense.
Troll
@@nilanperera4774 Is every comment that criticizes this rediculously biased poltical show "trolling"? Maybe the comment section should be filtered to only show glowing praise of these complacent clowns
I've yet to find one of your kind that can define "woke". although I'm sure you can. Maybe anything that post media and MAGA don't like.
@@reedhaley15 The term WOKE is a description of the sort of person who believes that
their mission in life is to correct the behavior and thought mechanisms of every other human being on planet Earth.
It reminds of the famous quote ""The road to hell is paved with good intentions".
@@1898JoeBoyle @reedhaley15 The term WOKE is ridiculously simple: wokism is minority rule. You do what’s best for the smallest minority. The complete opposite of democracy, which is majority rule.
Trudeau lies all the time, and everyone seems to accept this. Pierre Poilievre is more honest than Trudeau for sure. I don't hear you saying about Trudeau that I heard you say about Poilievre. Interesting!!!
People can't afford food, but Chantal thinks that voting against a Ukraine bill will do the Tories in...what are they smoking on 1 Yonge these days?
I agree ! The longer the war drags on and the worse the economy gets the less the everyday person cares about what is happening over seas.
It’s like putting on your own oxygen mask first on an airplane. Fix us first. If not, we all perish. Common sense.
What are you smoking?
Don’t care now. That’s enough money laundering already
Voting against installing a debilitating carbon tax on Ukrainians.
She loves that we are taxed to the hilt.
Refreshing seeing a leader answer questions instead of having Trudeau answer with a word salad or deflection
"There is NO liberal bias in the CBC" said Mansbridge while looking straight into the camera in a video clip. This should be played at the end of this podcast 'cause, ya know, we're not quite convinced.
We are blind to ourselves and our own biases --- even dear ones in this discussion
How bias can you get Truddy is so much worse !!!!!!!!
Your bias is showing
Hilarious that Bruce accuses Postmedia of being biased toward Pollievre, while ignoring the Toronto Star's obvious bias for Trudeau.
TorStar, CTV, CP, CBC... the list goes on and on. We only need to look at the erroneous statements made yesterday to Poilievre, by that CP reporter (regarding the Niagara Falls border crash) to demonstrate the media bias against the Conservative leader.
My goodness these three need a mirror!
Marxists always play this game: you're either with "progress"* or you're a biased problem on the wrong side of history.
* - as defined by Marxists
Post Media owns 80% of Canada’s print media lol
And CBC, Global, CTV, City, etc etc
Bruce Anderson is a stain
Well, this is the last time I’ll be watching this podcast.
you won't be missed but you will miss out on some of the only intelligent debate to be found online in canada
I was told some time ago that the daggers would be out to stab PP when the elections come closer and so it now it starts. But not to worry because PP will learn from your criticism and play his cards to enlighten the hypocrites that we see here.
Are you a "pp" cultists?
@@highway39 grow up, #Truanon
Your cult is dead
Act accordingly
@@highway39 you belong to Truenon
Say it ain’t so. Chantal, Peter, I had expected so much more from you. A full good talk bashing Poilievre on BS accusations, really? The fall economic update is a catastrophy, not a word on that! This week is a marker week for you.
Peter is a talking head, nothing more. This is expected from them.
Also check how many views are on this video, its pitiful, the public is fully aware these people no nothing and have tuned them out
@@evh3848 They know they're just not honest
Jesus christ you people are so sensitive. Three pundits discuss the leader of the opposition and you're acting like they desecrated a sacred statue. Bunch of snowflakes can't handle criticism.
It's about time PP was called on his falsehoods.
@@ALscience Only falsehoods I see is coming from Marxist Trudeau, Trudeau trying his best to bankrupt the country, you will own nothing and be happy, that's Trudeau's plan for Canada
Why doesn't the Trudeau media ask Trudeau tough questions. The answer money talks.
I find it endlessly amusing, how you guys continue to say that Pierre is going to lose support. He has amassed an almost 20 point lead doing everything the opposite of what you guys suggest. Listening to this commentary is useless.
I agree
sooooooooooo true bro
Hebert is a long standing member of the Trudeau Foundation.
Chantal USED to be one of my favourite journalists
The Trudeau regime must have given the MSM a raise in the last week. They all are all really down on Pierre. It is disgusting. Reporting the news is not a profession any more.
Blind
I’m surprised by the contempt in the panel for conservatives when the same contempt judged in another is the same contempt on display. It’s personal and beneath all 3 of you. Thank you for helping me understand what many liberals value and how they dismiss or dislike alternative ideas or values.
Liberal in name only, Fascist in deed.
Did you hear how PP answered the difficult questions asked by Rumble News on Foreign Protestors? These questions were deep and required a very direct and knowledgeable response. Trudeau would never have been able to answer these questions on the spot.
Also if Canada Post is giving PP a pass then what about the Canadian Press. Did you hear the CP reporter try to humiliate PP? He responded politely but made the reporter swallow her words. Oh yes, and let’s not forget the bias that has been openly exposed by CBC and CTV who actually get funded by the government. There is no justification for the poor governance that has occurred over the last eight years. Corruption, lying, lack of transparency, interfering in committee hearings on and on. Sorry if you want to make negative statements about PP and defend the Liberal / NDP coalition, I cannot accept what you are saying. PP has to be so frustrated with the way the opposition party is treated by the Liberal/NDP, the Federal appointed Senate and the liberal appointed Federal judges. Yes he may show a very serious side in House, but he is loyal to his loyal to the people. Heaven help us if Trudeau should win the next election. Sorry Mr Mansbridge but my Dad would be turning in his grave listening to you as you were watched regularity growing up. Question: when has the Liberal/NDP Block ever agreed to a motion presented by the Conservatives?
PP is that rare politician who knows :his brief; that is why he dominates dumb reporters.
Name one thing Poilievre has ever done to improve the lives of Canadians. One concrete thing.
See his work in Prime Minister Harpers Government: Low inflation, world class growth, strong housing increases, high quality job creation, better quality government services, low crime!!@@donmasters3965
@@donmasters3965 ran for the leadership of the conservatives. He has given this country hope again.
@@donmasters3965 Name one god thing Trudeau has done for Canada……of course you can’t,because he hasn’t!!! But lots of destruction!
A lot of the criticism of Pierre you can
apply to Justin. But yet on this show and in the media, criticism of Justin is nonexistent or with a gentle tone.
I am disappointed with Chantal's comment on how Poilievre treated a female reporter. Should there be a difference? Has Chantal forgotten the Poilievre - David Aitken exchange of about a year ago? The apple orchard exchange? I suspect Poilievre dislikes/distrusts all journalists regardless of gender and will treat them the same, and said journalists should be prepared to do their job under those circumstances. Chantal also commented on slogans such as "Bring it Home"; she might also have mentioned other tiresome slogans such as "we've got your back" and "that's not who we are". I could also mention some of Bruce's comments but it would serve no purpose. Suffice it to say that I have not missed a single Bridge episode in the past 18 months but this one by far has been the most disappointing - to the degree that I think that I'll take a break for a few weeks. Doug M.
The question I had was whether PP was so rude to the reporter because she's a woman. I'm afraid I believe it was. Poilievre is a loose cannon with a sarcastic, rude mouth he can't control. His handlers have been trying to smooth down Poilievre’s barbs but I'm afraid a porcupine will always be a porcupine. It protection against what it perceives as a threat is those sharp, painful raised barbs.
@sharonsiba553 no he has had enough of the lies.
@sharonsiba553 very clear to normal people thats not the case. Youre grasping at straws hoping it can be spun that way because you'll "never vote conservative". Cult mentality
Oh no! Someone had an opinion I disagree with so I’ll stop listening to them period. Poilievre only dislikes journalists, irrespective of gender, when they rightly ask him questions about his mess-ups that he’d rather not answer. But good luck stroking yourself in your bubble though.
From before the 40 minute mark when they started calling PP a liar. It was their inadequate search management that was shown to be the lie. NOW do you think these 3 would ever acknowledge that? It's just a platform for 2/3 of the panel to attack their squishy qualifying. Chantal and Bruce are always using qualifiers and assumptions where no substance exists.
Chantal are you enjoying your seat on the board at the Trudeau Foundation?
Fake fool 🤡she is!!!
What do you even mean by a 'Free Pass?' Poillievre is showing himself to be bright, observant, insightful and a good communicator. He has many years of political experience as opposed to the trude who was born into his current position as an entitled baby boy with no demonstrative experience or observable skill.
😂😂 he has fooled you too!
Well said..
Extremely interesting commentary about the Conservative leader. Most interesting is that similar commentary was not made about Trudeau when he was denigrating millions of Canadians during the trucker convoy without demonstrating the leadership needed to actually have a conversation with him. Trudeau is the cockiest and most self centred/arrogant politician in all of Canada. It sure would be nice if the media, even this left-leaning panel would accurately contrast these leaders so that viewers have a reasonable comparison of their character.
💯
Well said!!! I met Trudeau and Pierre, as well Leslyn and Melissa! Trudeau was the fakest, red-carpet lover I’ve ever seen!! Pierre was so fun 🤩 Melissa too, and he could relate to regular people! I told my husband I want to hang out with Pierre and Anna his wife, lol! Decent, family-oriented people who uphold family values!!
You mean negotiate with people who thought that he should resign and leave the governor general in charge. Also people who clogged up a major city for ages, were caught with swastikas and desecrated the statue of Terry Fox. I'm certain they'd be a reasonable bunch
Anyone who belongs to a movement that wants to illegally overthrow a democratically elected government like those insurrectionists did isn't speaking on behalf of the majority of Canadians.
Conservatives gambled and lost that they would get the support of the majority of Canadians when they held the country hostage for 21 days and terrorized communities.
The majority of Canada are not anti-vaxxers either. Unlike conservatives.
You don't negotiate with terrorists. Justin Trudeau made the correct call.
I long for unbiased political discussion. Until today, I appreciated this podcast. I have always been wary of the right wing claim that all of the media leans too far to the left. Surprisingly, today I find myself agreeing with this crowd when it comes to this video. This is very biased reporting. I am VERY disappointed by the three of you today.
Agreed 100%. And I say this as a former card carrying Liberal and alumnus of Mr. Mansbridge's fine institution of higher learning.
@@kevinb5011absolutely
Me too.
Well said...
well said
All you have to do is google pollievre and see all the negative headlines about him. The fifth estate has given a free pass to Trudeau since even before he won his parties leadership. Remember Trudeau-mania?
WHO FUNDS GOOD TALK? PROBABLY SAME AS CBC! CTV TORONTO!
Our tax dollars
It airs 3 times a day on satellite radio, 7:00 12:00 and 5:00.
The channel is called "Canada Talks".
That's a lot of propaganda damage.
Could any of the libertarians here tell us what kind of Canada they want, SURELY not the Trudeau/NDP one we have now ? This won't hurt Pierre at all. Canada is so sick of the Liberals and their lies, many would love nothing better than if they never had a seat anywhere next election. This time, Libs have really botched things up. Let's wait and see.
19:38 that’s not how a reporter should speak to the leader of the opposition
The three Amigos trying so hard......
The questions asked by some of these journalists are vague and not always based on fact so it is time that politicians made them accountable. Canadians need a new government and are TOTALLT tired of Justin Trudeau who has not answered a question since he was elected. The character of the Liberals has been nothing but corrupt and sly!!!
Oh, the humanity! Pierre Poliviere standing up to the media. Calling b.s. when a reporter creates an imaginary question (the apple interview) and the CP reporter that clearly had an agenda.
The media in Canada has been fawning over a Justin for years and now that Canadians (and the media) are learning that they have been had.
While I am old-fashioned enough to read newspapers, I am not surprised that younger people eschew the media and no longer have paid attention to them and are seeking their information elsewhere.
The info they get elsewhere is the real b.
What bs question in the apple interview? The one asking him about his populist approach?
Well put.
You all really can't handle any amount of criticism, can you? Some pundits talk about how he messed up this week and you all fly off the handle and act like they punched baby jesus. Relax. He's just another politician who doesn't care about you. Pierre as PM will be no different than Justin. They're both awful.
@@stratford374 I'd say it'd be a decent bit worse, cause Poilievre wants to destroy the separation of the bank of Canada crashing our dollar
Yes panel, but, the government that is supposed to be leading by example, has continuously displayed boorishness, narcissism and intolerance.
Like this podcast? You’re correct
It costs taxpayers $29,000 a year per reporter in subsidies. Total bullshit
You need to go back and check the time. You are wrong!!!
No they’re right . Poilievre lied . He lied on the Ukraine trade deal too . His worst week as leader .
In the Liberals Neo Nazi/Marxist way of thinking is you are with us or against us.
I usually enjoy this panel, even though it’s obvious that there is a left bias on all three panelists, however this week, wow, it was a lefty feeding frenzy, the fact is, many Canadians have had it with Trudeau and his obfuscation and non answers, and appreciate a leader that actually answers questions, and doesn’t simply spout “talking points” over and over. I think a more balanced approach from this panel would be appropriate.
100%
When has Pierre ever answered a question from the media without lecturing them if they dare push back on his B.S.? The answer is never.
I’m sorry but CTV reported it was a terror incident and all PP said was there was media reports that it was an act of terror. Please get facts straight for Canadians.
Pierre lied about that. He was quoting FOX News.
@@donmasters3965 ohhh Donny boy. try and keep up. CTV initially reported at 1:50pm that Trudeau’s own security experts were calling it a terror related incident. Glad to see you bought Peter’s blatant lie though. All of this is provable with time stamps if you care enough to do a basic search in this instead of taking the words from someone benefiting from tax dollar funded bribes to keep them employed
CTV reported over 15 minutes after Pierre made his statements in the House of Commons. Please get facts straight for Canadians.
@@petermartin4142 you can say that all you want. There’s time stamps and multiple sources to prove you wrong. Open your eyes. You’re wrong. You’re buying into government funded propaganda because you can’t take the fact that the big bad conservatives were right.
@@donmasters3965hahhaaa he’s asked a question in question period! JT could have said it’s not a terror attacking when he’s said an explosion occurred.
Look at the way your friend Trudeau talks to the people. Who are not liberal.
Peter you should change your podcast to Liberal talk with Peter Mansbridge
I’d put money on they turn off the comments on this show soon. Just like the MSM youtube channels.
Why? the comments help drive the TH-cam algorithm, and it's not like they actually care what random people online actually think.
@@dennisheyes4561 🤣🤣🤣 no hurt feelings then. Good.
So much focus on this and laughable Bruce comments in the Post when you can see CBC do the same. Also the gleeful dialogue here about PP (correct or not) undermines credibility of an attempt to be fair handed on the podcast. And finally not as much time in when Jolie and PM used HAMAS propaganda to blame Israel immediately after the hospital strike which was a real gaff unlike this.
These panelists being so concerned with someone being polite and respectful, when it’s not mutually reciprocated. It’s ok to have hurt feelings, it’s ok not to be liked by everyone. Bad names and rudeness isn’t the down fall of society. It’s the downfall of the weak and frail who can’t handle dealing with everyday life in general that’s driven us to this broken state we live in today.
Couple episodes ago these folks said they liked bluntness when Mark Miller was going after Pierre. Total hypocrisy
Are you reading the comments Peter? Your channel is getting ratio'd by real Canadian voters, not right wing radicals.
Social media threads are not representative of the broader voting population .
@@ThePapaJohnKing This is not your average social media page. The people who watch Peter and his crew are not the uneducated non-voter. They are the people who will determine the outcome of the next election.
If Peter, the "mainstream media", the Liberals and the NDP ignore these voices, they will do so at their political peril.
If Peter Mansbridge, a former journalist, thinks showing a clip of Pollievre taking down a snot nosed CP “journalist” makes him look bad, he has completely lost his grip on reality.
Mansbridge was only ever relevant when legacy media had a stranglehold on Canadian news content. His lack of viewership in the modern era shows what a hack hes always been
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!
Peter, I just watched another news that showed we the public the time stamp of the time the media published the report, which proves P.P. Was correct. Also why do you people not show your time stamp to prove your point. Your show is too bias for me, I thought a reporter of your experience would do better!!!
You’re wrong . And CTV have confirmed you’re wrong … and Poilievre was lying . You are misinterpreting an update notice . The original tweet of that information , which did NOT confirm terrorism , was 2:50 … after Poilievre’s comment . He lied . And he’s lying about the Ukraine trade deal too .
Why would he mention that the media reported it first then. You liberals always have to put a spin on any reports that make you feel good.
@@ThePapaJohnKing 🤣🤣🤣🤣 like you know what your saying. Nobody cares. We need a better government
I know exactly what I’m saying . Poilievre lied on the car crash issue … deflected , bullied and lied . And he lied on the Ukraine free trade deal . Pierre’s worst week as leader. Don’t worry . You get your vote in 2025 .
Chantal's comments border on defamation, and are verifiably factually incorrect. Her calling the leader of the opposition a liar while presenting a patently untrue version of events is frightening. Chantal has always been one of my favourite Canadian political commentators, but her words put a sick feeling in my stomach. I feel like the dislike of Pierre and desire to defend the media is clouding the vision a bit much.
They have everything to lose if Pierre wins. You are finally seeing the depths of corruption of our institutions. It goes far deeper than this, but our media is completely captured by the government. We are no different than China or Russia state propaganda.
And the Liberals talk about censoring hate language
For 8 years "the press" has refused to actually cover the reality of Liberal policies. I probably would take this stance as well if my portion of the $660M taxpayers dollars depended on that.
This is an assemblage of elite political analysts who are completely out of touch with ordinary people. Pierre was composed and gentle with that young lady reporter. The reporters job is to have a good question, not a cheap 'gotcha'. Regarding Pierre and the Apple, that clip went viral across the globe because people are so sick of effete society. Get off your high horse panel, hang out with some normal folks.
Exactly though the libtards just gave these fools a boost in salary until after the election! Stupi- Trudeau also hiring someone to help ‘clean up his pathetic image’ lolol!!! He’s done and the working class is sick of him!!
I really would. Not have expected that this panel would support any form of Marxism and accept authoritarianism over the democracy that my Dad and others fought for during WW11.
I know it’s scary. Leftists will literally kill people in name of ideology.
Pretty dissapointed you guys are in a bubble. PP is refreshing!
The accusation that Poilievre did this to the reporter because she was a women is probably one of the worst takes I've seen on this podcast (and I am one who enjoys many of the discussions, they are usually well balanced). He doesn't like media and it doesn't matter who the person across from him is. I truly believe there are many Canadians who are sick of journalists/media getting treated with kids gloves and they want politicians who stand up to them and fire back. These are not far right Trump-like supporters either, as much as social media would like to assume that. Poilievre may not be the idea person for this, he is wrong too often doing it, but someone should. Canadians are getting sick of respect for people who have done nothing to earn it other then show up and demand it.
Well said...
But everything that came out of his mouth was bullshit.
Except he has a history of doing it. He’s a sawed-off little prick with a Napoleon complex. A character flaw that made him change his name from Jeff to Pierre lol.
@@amilton2128 great insight and commentary, you should join the panel...🙄
Well said!! 💯 %!!!! They’re going to get a whopping in the next election!!
No wonder why I don’t listen to this show. The debate is ridiculous. You are all out of touch with what Canadians think.
I tried, I really tried to listen to your analysis with an open mind but your bias is obscene.
The only thing you did not call Pierre was a racist, I’m sure that’s coming.
Your elitist Quebec/Ontario attitude are exactly why the Conservatives will form the next Government.Conservatives will form the next
These people are not serious 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤡🦧🦧
unfortunately they are!
@@GypsMoth13 😭😭
Clearly you legacy types are scared . Nothing but paid for arrogance . The CP girl shows perfectly how the bar is so low . Did she go to he conference on her skate board . Trolls to you types are those who disagree . Aiken showed his arrogance . You people are not anointed. Talking down to Canadians , most of whom are smarter and more useful is not the way to go . Chantal is funny , she doesn't even try and hide it.
This seems like a pretty biased discussion. Peter your old CBC colours are showing. I really hope Pierre P wins. And talk about a free pass. I would say the liberals have been given multiple free passes for several years. So tired of the liberals.
I would love to watch him in a leaders debate ! You guys are delusional.
Pierre had many leaders debates. He buried and destroyed Huaweii charest and has 1 million times the ammo to go after socks.
Oh my God, Chantelle, you can’t be serious. Are you really backing up our crime Minister. He’s the biggest, narcissist, criminal Prime Minister we’ve ever had!! he doesn’t deserve any respect. He has ruined a lot of peoples lives, including mine, he’s got to go.
Trudeau foundation alumni are always gonna protect the dear leader
Well said.
Agree with you! I met him and Pierre he’s so fake and Pierre was so kind gentle and funny! He wanted to keep talking to us but there was a line up! Trudumb was all about the red carpet photo ops! Loser 🤡🤡🤡🤡🙄🙄🙄
Surprising that Peter and Chantel didn't fact check their claims before embarrassing themselves by lying publicly...
Not so surprising
Another 600 million given to the media
Yup CTV Toronto reported the terror related event by gov. Sources at 13:09 over an hour before Pierre mentioned it.
CBC has been giving the Liberals a free pass forever. It would be terrible for the CBC to say a thing good about the Conservatives
No. I am a conservative and PP actions were completely unacceptable. I do not want a leader who diminishes other peole to look good. Terrible leadership. That woman is his fellow Canadian and he can't talk unity and pull that kind of reckless stunt. She asked a legit question. It deserved an respectful answer.
Lemme guess, you’re looking forward to moving into your very own Pierre Poilievre suite in CBC HQ when your party wins power and your boy shuts down CBC.
@@LeeMarieHarder
"She asked a legit question. It deserved an respectful answer."
Okay, I'll bite: what was the "legit question" that she asked?
@LeeMarieHarder this was absolutely nothing compared to the vile hateful things Trudeau called Canadian truckers. Have you forgotten about that?
@@AS-qg1xu the vast majority of truckers looked at the dopes who invaded Ottawa, rejected their juvenile idiocy, and continued to deliver for Canadians.
I guess the MSM should learn not to poke the bear. She asked him a factually incorrect question and paid the price for it. If it was David Akin asking the exact same thing would of happened. 41 percent
Factually incorrect? He claimed there was a terrorist attack, that's factually correct. And then blamed it on CTV, which was factually incorrect as they didn't report what he claimed until 15 minutes after he spoke.
Your boy is lying to your face but you're so blindly partisan you either can't see it or don't care.
It'd be nice if PP' fanboys actually had some critical thinking skills. I don't fundamentally disagree with everything he says, policy wise, but the way he dumbs it done for rubes like you makes it insufferable.
They are too cowardly to show all of the dislikes for their propaganda video. I respected these people for my whole life. Their descent into hit pieces and slander is disgusting.
I totally agree. Chantel spits venom at conservatives.
Right.. it's only fair when they criticize Trudeau and the Liberals. Any mention of Poilievre, outside of blind praise, is sacrilege. Get over yourself.
Pierre frigged up this week, so he gets criticized. What are you going to do if/when he's in power and he's constantly being criticized? Are you going to call any nay-sayers cowardly? Get over yourself.
You're just upset they don't agree with you.
Oh, you like a little catchphrase from Chantal. How about the carbon tax, poor Canadians? Oh, don't bring that up.
We all know how bias you are. It’s time for an election. It’s time for change. Mr. Mansbridge please tell your buddy Trudeau that his party and the NDP’s party’s time is up. Call an election, what are you afraid of.
Point of order: did @CTVTORONTO not report this on their twitter account well before Pierre said anything about terrorism in Parliament? I swear I saw them tweet this but now when I look at their twitter profile all mention of the rainbrow bridge is scrubbed till the late evening on Wednesday.
A CTV reporter tweeted it prior to Pierre saying anything in the house of commons, but the main CTV twitter account did not until approx. 20 minutes after PPs comments in the house of commons. But, this whole issue is a red herring. Pierre never claimed that CTV stated terrorism before he made his comments, he said media reports did, which was factual. Rather, he drew a comparison between CTV getting it wrong 3 times, and he (Pierre) making the factual observation that media had called this a terrorist attack. The CP reporter misrepresented the facts in the premise of her question, and he called her out on it, while illustrating the medias own mistakes in reporting on this issue.
@@kevinb5011 so why are the people in this saying it has been discredited? It looks to me like they have discredited themselves here because nothing Pierre said was wrong on this issue. Did the talking heads above fail to do their own research? mansbridge is supposed to be on top of this stuff so shame on him.
@@barfnelson5967 it's a good question.
No
@@barfnelson5967
It doesn't matter if they're they're wrong the damage is done. That's how left-wing media works.
I would love to see a strong relationship built between the PQ and UCP as neither are friends of Ottawa and both aspire to more independence.
Nothing to see here except three die hard liberals pandering to their boss Justin.
There was no incident. The journalist asked a stupid question. This a typical bias discussion.
I grew up wathing Peter. He was a great jurnalist. He did actual journalism. He and Walter Cronkite were like 2 pees in a pod. I had the up most respect for his work. After watching this panel. That is gone. He has lost my respect. Not that respect as a single person matters. But i am sure i am not the only one feels this way.
That's a result of the fact that people have become so accustomed to only watching one side of a story that they agreed with. They act like a quality journalist that actually challenges the positions of politicians that they like is terrible journalism. A good politician is one that actually defends their position against negative criticism. Not one that goes onto shows to give a sermon to people that think they can do no wrong. That is a waste of time.
I used like Peter growing up also, but he became unbearable entitled rich elite. If we don’t follow his payed for narrative, then we are ignorant, misogynistic racist. Oh wait Trudolph said they “PROBABLY” are ignorant, misogynistic, racist. He said this to a paid propaganda news station, who of course never called him out for lying and being divisive. Then Truedumb denied saying this in a later interview. Of course the True-fraud people will deny he said both. Why do we have to pay taxes to the Trudope propaganda station, when it obvious they despise over 1/2 of Canada that give taxes to them.
@dennisheyes4561 it's not his political views that made me lose respect for him. It's the denial of the media being bias against conservatives. Especially Pierre poilievre. To say PP has been given a pass by the media is an out right lie.
I have seen his conversation with the CP journalist... He is very reasonable and remained factual in his responses, he pointed the inaccuracies the journalist added to her questions. I mean, this is pretty good compared to a PM that has third grade level of rhetoric, you don't agree with Trudeau? You'll be called name and this is the depth of his understanding of the world, he may also throw a tantrum from time to time.
Pierre P. Does not have to agree with the framing of every questions he is asked. I would say that I am happy I could see the whole exchanges that hurt the press so much for myself because you see who is the manipulator in these, and this is not the politician in most cases (which is surprising, this is almost as if the journalists were members of the Liberal party at time).
Love this pod but this episode is an easy pass. I only lasted 5 minutes before the Pollievre Derangement Syndrome knocked me out. Please either add a fourth middle-right voice to the panel or trade Bruce for Rex Murphy.
LOL; Rex Murphy would scorch their cookies good.
Rex Murphy would be a genius move
Rex is better than that though.
@@tarafox6618 you saying Rex wouldn’t be up to the challenge? Think again.
@@gordm3527 not that, he just better than that.
I LOVE Chantelle. And Peter. And I am SHOCKED at how neither have an accurate finger on the pulse of what is happening in the nation. Pierre is going to win in a landslide. Remember Kim Campbell? It won't be as bad but it is going to be a disaster for Liberals. And I'm a Liberal. But I'm voting for Pierre.
Justin's father huh! no the other one Pierre Trudeau was gawd aweful horrible person
And your vote will be cancelled out by your wife and daughters. That, frankly, should give you pause.
You're not a Liberal! No liberal or true Canadian would vote for Poilievre. Trust me, he was my MP for years before my riding was split. He is a lying, two faced piece shit who will say anything to get elected. He is a great attack dog, but that's all he's got. Like Trump, he has no interest in helping Canadian people, it's all about his ego and desire for power.
bless you for you have been reborn
P.P. Has my family’s vote no cancelling out here!
Journalist have themselves to blame. They have a double standard on treating politicians from the left and right.
Left and center we don't have a right in Canada
@@davidheipel2934 I guess by your assumption then centre is right.
@@andyozga6901
No there is a right and maybe a far right but it doesn't exist in any quantity.
The political spectrum has to be anchored or else it's meaningless.
That's a big part of the problem the left own the conversation the language they frame everything from their point of view as an absolute.
If you are a center Western values and have integrity/back bone you can't even have a conversation with them. Mention PPC they go into convulsions and foam at the mouth.
Sorry if I lost lost the topic.
Not one of you suggested, that maybe we need to get better journalist questions. Played well on Social Media. Time to let go of your pearls guys.
The fact that Chantal thinks how Poilievre treated the reporter is one thing, but to add the fact she is female is tiresome. Women, for decades, have fought for equal rights. The way Poilievre spoke to the reporter definitely reeked of an arrogance that we can surely compare to that of Trudeau. However, as a female myself, I do not think I deserve more or less consideration compared to a man.
Poilievre doesn't see reporters genders, he hates them all equally!
@@user-ec2nn6ht9r Has there been any evidence at all that he treats women differently from men? It really like like playing "the women card" just because she was at the receiving end of this. The apple incident shows he is annoyed by journalists no matter who they are.
I agree, if the female journalist can’t take the heat, she better find another job!
Chantel should not complain, she often sounds arrogant and nasty!!
He didn't grope her.
The panel fully and truly unhinged today. lol
Canadians would rather have someone gaslight and lie to us or even better not answer a question at all
As far as I’ve read and researched
Ctv did in fact make the claim before it was pointed out in question period
Your research is wrong.
@@donmasters3965 ... You must still be wearing your mask
@@karoldreynolds7651 Lemme guess, you’re still sitting in your truck honking your horn.
Lemme guess… you and that reporter who asked the question are still wearing head phones and a touque ?😂
Honk honk !!😮
What is the difference between conservative and right wing Mr. Mansbridge? Inquiring minds want to know.
I guess calling out any female journalist is sexist, so I'll say that Peter has an extraordinarily bias in his views of Canandians.
Thank you three for your constructive criticism of PP.
We will take it under advisement, in the meantime we will accept you voting conservative in the next election for as you know voting liberal and by extension for JT is just plain dumb
3 libs that nobody has ever cared about for 300 Alex
But, he is our "orangeman". And by your reaction you're getting the message. It is the Liberal party who is putting American style politics out there.
I wrote the National Post story about the prime minister's personal days that was discussed in this podcast. By way of indictment, Ms. Hebert claims it was David Akin who calculated the number of days off an average Canadian gets. In fact, that figure -- 34 per cent -- was taken directly from the very story she was rubbishing, as was the fact that the PM often works on personal days and that he was the only PM to post his itineraries. Ms. Hebert is welcomed to dunk on the story, but she ought to have read it in full first. (Also: Mr. Mansbridge claims David is the Ottawa bureau chief for Global News. That will come as a surprise to Mercedes Stephenson, who actually holds the title.) I wrote a piece on my substack this week on how and why I reported on the PM's personal days. I invite you to read it. That all said, I do (usually) enjoy Good Talk. -- Glen McGregor
Your article is clearly an attack on JT. What with everything going on in the world compelled you to write this article? Have you similarly written articles on PP's travel and electioneering without a writ being dropped, on our dime? He is breaking ejection rules but you write about JT's personal days like it is a major scandal. Just more proof of one sided propoganda.
Yes, in the 9th paragraph of the story you provide some context after a headline and sub headline and 8 paragraphs building up the false idea that Trudeau takes a lot of time off. A fig leaf added after the point most readers would actually read in order to give yourself some cover.
And what Chantel got wrong about the Akin quote is that his number was 28.5% - the amount of time off you would get if you worked 5 days a week and didn’t take your legally required 2 week vacation or any holidays like Canada Day, Thanksgiving, New Year’s Day, Christmas etc. off. More context that wasn’t in your story.
And write whatever you want on your substack but what you wrote in the NP made a story out of the time Trudeau took off putting that front and center, portraying it as inordinate (22 months!) when what your numbers show is that he works more than the vast majority of Canadians and has less time off than the vast majority of us.
Hey Mansbridge, I'm writing a screenplay about an adventure set in Northern Ontario. A fictional version of you is the leading man, and Chantal Hebert is the leading lady. You two have to battle an evil version of Knowlton Nash. Also, fictional versions of Wendy Mesley and Neil Macdonald appear, but they're bound by non-disclosure agreements with the CBC, so have no dialogue. Thoughts?
And yes I’m certainly overjoyed that I didn’t get the jib-jab Chantal