Middle Earth SBG | Before You Buy: Army of Thror

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @FetaCheese717
    @FetaCheese717 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just getting into the game, and found your channel, very informative! I look forward to when you guys talk about Lothlorien

  • @craigcameron3378
    @craigcameron3378 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Some of the nicest warrior models in the game, I always wanted this. Last Christmas got one painted (far better than I can do!) And love playing with them. Great video, thanks for sharing

    • @thehobbybreakfastshow
      @thehobbybreakfastshow  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're so solid in game, never seem to let me down. Glad you enjoyed the vid! - OT

  • @charlessadlerii6205
    @charlessadlerii6205 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been looking at the Army of Thror a lot. I might start it towards the end of next year. I think there are some interesting-looking yellow alliances. In a yellow alliance, you don't take Thror, but Thrain is still a great leader and he actually kills stuff. My favorite yellow alliance I saw was just grabbing a wizard from the White Council, preferably Saruman. Adding in some potent magic can be quite enhancing and I find it doesn't hurt the numbers too bad since the dwarves die so slowly. Great video!

  • @Jewus19
    @Jewus19 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In my opinion all the dwarven factions share something in common (iron hills to a lesser extend but khazad dum and army of thror in any case): Difficulty to play: High. Maybe one of the highest of all factions. But maybe this category is a bit obscured of what it really means. If it means "any beginner can shove high defence models into the enemy army" then that would be correct at easy. If it is "have a decent chance to perform well in any scenario" that is not easy for any dwarf faction at all. Only the best players can pull this off. Strong and expensive heroes lacking mobility and magic defence, mediocre shooting at best, none in case of army of thror, less than mediocre in case of khazad dum. No magic. One/none cavalry options. Mobility to get anywhere in general. Low might on any points level (in comparison to most other armies).

    • @thehobbybreakfastshow
      @thehobbybreakfastshow  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A fair point, the lack of mobility is really difficult to manage for so many scenarios. The low might is also rough when you're more likely to have to burn it on marches than in other factions

  • @hunsler1006
    @hunsler1006 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Maybe I was lucky but my thror and thrain look great 😅

  • @zelot113
    @zelot113 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is a thror dale alliance strong?
    I feel like thror and dale synergies well together using dale archers with that f3 and grim hammers as front liners,
    And potentially running dual windlance at higher point games

    • @thehobbybreakfastshow
      @thehobbybreakfastshow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      OTs run this a few times and had some success- it still has the flaws of no cavalry, but they definitely work well together for the reasons you've said- Onod

  • @DrEggChan
    @DrEggChan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I must be doing some thing wrong, but that 600 point list comes out to 608 for me 🤔

    • @thehobbybreakfastshow
      @thehobbybreakfastshow  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are correct! There should be one less warrior of erebor with spear and shield! Well spotted - OT

  • @jackgibson2743
    @jackgibson2743 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gandalf is that you?