I am Korean and my coworker was one of the 179 victims of that accident. I am still in deep sorrow and I think other families feel the same way. I express my deepest condolences to all the victims.
Basically some airports are too close to residential areas and busy highways. If the plane overshot the runway things could be even more catastrophic. It’s poor airport selection sites
Even if there was no concrete wall there, there's still fence in front, and even if the plane survived that fence, there's resident area in front again that could crash the plane, the speed was still high.
It's an embankment of solid ground for the Localizer antennas with concrete foundation uprooted because of the impact. The airport wall is still a few distance away from that antenna structure.
who knows ? plane was rubbing belly with full speed.. even if wall wasn't there it would have gone too far with that speed or if body of plane get damaged due to friction or burst due to sparking.
@@naruto6918 no man not at all , friction slows it down, there are heaps of landings like this , you just need an extra space at the end, you hit dirt and empty land at 90 km/h at the end of a run way you do slow down eventually, even if you hit water or a beach your usually fine.... your forgeting that there is a brick wall 200 metre at the end of the runaway.... most airports have another 1km of empty space and fields or more then wire fences or the ocean
I had hoped that Korea could rise above everything in 2025 after such a challenging 2024. But hearing about this tragedy leaves me heartbroken. My deepest condolences go out to the families of the victims. May they rest in peace.
As a aviation maintainer my self , from what i can see and with the information being put out I would say that the aircraft had a complete hydraulic failure , these aircraft have 2 hydraulic systems and yes the engines provide power to both of those systems. the Boeing 737 does has a redundant hydraulic systems, typically consisting of two separate systems (labeled as System A and System B) to ensure continued functionality even if one system fails; this redundancy is a critical safety feature in aircraft design. As we can see in the video the aircraft did suffer a bird strike to one of the engines but even with one engine out, the secondary " emergency hydronic system would be enough to lower the landing gear, operate flaps and reverse thrusters. on top of that these planes are equipped with an emergency mechanical system for the landing gear, allowing pilots to manually deploy the gear using a gravity-assisted mechanism in case of total hydraulic failure . The engines directly provide power to the hydraulic systems by driving engine-driven pumps that generate hydraulic pressure for the aircraft's flight controls and other systems; essentially, when the engines are running, they power the hydraulic pumps which then distribute pressurized fluid throughout the hydraulic system. In conclusion and in my opinion as others have stated , if the barrier was not at the end of the runway , then the aircraft would have hit the dirt and then would have been slowed down even more. most modern airports have a special section of runway at the end, that is designed to collapse under the weight of the aircraft to slow it down even more. think of it kind of like loose sand , the landing gear would dig in to it and slow the aircraft even more. now in the event of a total hydraulic failure the pilots would treat this like a water landing, meaning they would not deploy reverse thrusters, why ? well because as shown in the video they only had one engine working, if they deployed reverse thrusters the aircraft would umm lets say" list" to one side or the other due to the uneven thrust on one side. this then would cause the aircraft to tumble and roll and break up . from what's shown , it appears that the pilots are doing every thing correctly , as per there training. also being that they had only one engine IF they did deploy the landing gear they still would not of had the power from the other engine to slow them down enough, despite what people may think , a aircraft doesn't stop by its breaks alone like a car does , the pilots were relying on ground friction to stop them , the sad thing is , is that there was a concrete barrier at the end of the run way .my heart breaks with all of the families of those who died .
I agree with you, the pilots did a great job of landing the plane, and all, or most would have survived if not for the wall. The same thing happened in Jamaica in 2007, everyone survived because there was no wall.
@@thelazarusproject52 Nope. It’s triple. And electrical hydraulic pumps. And actuators. And electrical motors for flaps. And manual drop down of the landing gear. And checklists. And common sense.
Zero mention that was another BOEING 737-800 plane that was malfunctioned within 24 hours with only 100 of such planes on earth, one KLM KL1204 flight on 12/28 in Netherland (Hydraulic System failure), and another on 12/29 in S. Korea (possible Hydraulic System failure). What's the odd of that? BOEING must have paid a lot of PR for all these so called reporters/experts not to question about BOEING's planes. Especially given, two former BOEING engineer & quality control technician turn whistleblowers exposed frequent Boeing malpractice and they were dead the day before they can testify in court! Enough said!
Zero mention that was another BOEING 737-800 plane that was malfunctioned within 24 hours with only 100 of such planes on earth, one KLM KL1204 flight on 12/28 in Netherland (Hydraulic System failure), and another on 12/29 in S. Korea (possible Hydraulic System failure). What's the odd of that? BOEING must have paid a lot of PR for all these so called reporters/experts not to question about BOEING's planes. Especially given, two former BOEING engineer & quality control technician turn whistleblowers exposed frequent Boeing malpractice and they were dead the day before they can testify in court! Enough said!
But the wall didn’t cause the plane to malfunction and skid off the runway. We need to understand why this happened instead of only blaming the object it struck. Some facts: The concrete wall/localizer was more than 1000ft/300meters from the end of the runway and it complies with international aviation law. Beyond the wall there is a ditch, a street and buildings. So even if the wall wasn’t there, it would have still been a disaster.
@@YCHTT This is whta happen when you talk garbage without any knowledge Boeing did a lot of bad shit with the 737Max and the 787 but in this case have 0 responsibility this aircraft is the 2 most popular aircraft variant in the world and has been used for 30 years with one of the best safe track records.
If even one small bird can cause catastrophic damage to a plane in flight why have they not designed some kind of mechanism shield for the engines or components by now? They’re basically saying even a small single bird can cause a plane to crash!!!! Look it up. I’m never flying again.
@@keeliekalayidol8876 it’s not like that - aviation is safe. Safer than driving for example. A small single bird as you said cannot be the sole cause for a disaster to happen - it’s cascading sequence of events that happens and bird strike was just one of them. And I’m a pilot, trust me, we and the engineers have thought about your question about shielding the engine components with some sort of mechanism that will prevent birdstrikes or any type of damage. We have engine nacelles but the fan blades can’t be covered with anything because it will disrupt the airflow and the angle of attack of the blades, and ultimately will render the engine inop. That’s the reality - with aviation physics ifs always this way, you can’t get something good without also getting something bad. Like generating lift causes induced drag, etc.
The plane has no fire whatsoever while on its belly, the fire or explosion only happened when they hit that concrete wall for whatever that was supposed to me. It got me thinking maybe there was a possibility that not that many people would die if that reinforce concrete was not at the end of the run away...
@@RalphBarrera That's sparks and that would've mitigated if the ground crew had any time to deploy fire retardant on the runway. Either way, the explosion would've happened regardless of whether or not the sparks was present.
@@seriousorganizer If there is something important behind that wall then the airport's design was quite foolish. I've certainly never seen something like that anywhere near a runway. One would assume for this exact reason.
All flight controls on the 737 except the rudder can be fully controlled manually via cables without any hydraulics. They had elevator control, and this can be seen in how small adjustments were made to the landing attitude. Ingesting a bird doesn't typically cause full loss of hydraulics, and gear can be released mechanically. Flaps can be extended electrically if no hydraulics are present. This is going to be a very interesting accident report.
@@SciFly7 One thing is certain, an accident with airliner will always consist of multiple factors. Normally combination of pilot training, CRM, maintenence, series of unfortunate external event and the surface condition. So, yeah agreed with your comment. It will be interesting for sure on their final report. Condolences to the family of the victims in this flight.
easy just have to land 50% faster than normal landing speed for a 737 its not too bad its a medium size plane i think its about 160km with flaps and 240 km hour with no flaps landing speed . It would slow down eventually touching down at 240km hour even without brakes
Um no. This plane likely could have landed just fine. Why didn’t they manually put down the gear? Even if they lost both engines, which I don’t think, they could still have put gear down.
@@justsomecommie2638 its called an emergency landing for a reason, what you want Toyoto and Honda to start making cars with no parking brakes next and call it user error when people start dying
It was moving way too fast for a safe landing besides not being configured for that. Looks like the pilots might have been hit by another bird and some window pieces.
What’s truly malicious about that airport is how they concealed concrete structures beneath dirt piles. Had the concrete been visible, the pilot would have avoided that runway.
I honestly abhor this morbid obsession on day 1 of every such disaster. Investigators will do their job, sort it out and make aviation safer tomorrow. That’s it, tomorrow. Today you have broken families and a society with a shattered morale after all they have been through in recent weeks. Our hearts and thoughts should be with them. Call your Korean friend, tell them you love them and be there for them.
@@mathewwilson9776 Marshall law was a myth and brought on by the leftist lunatics if you really know the full story. Marshall law isn't always what you people think it is.
The plane looked like it landed ok probably saving everyone inside but when it hit that concrete wall at that speed well no one had a chance at that point. ...Tragic. Rip to those souls lost.😢
@@lawrencedavidson6195 same thing air france flight 358 in 2005 at pearson airport, there was no wall and it crashed into a creek, the whole plane was destroyed but everyone lived
I am Korean. 2024 is a very difficult year for Koreans It's so sad and heartbreaking😢 Please continue to pay attention to this accident so that the truth can be accurately investigated. Thank you for all your consolation to Koreans..
Lots of lives were ended and yet everyone in the comment section became soooooo knowledgeable about being a pilot and/or designers of an aircraft 👌 Condolences to the families affected.
The experienced pilots and engineers are here. We just try to ignore idiots who have no idea what they are talking about. Also the fools in the media. We are waiting for the CVR and FDR to be read and a preliminary report with information to be released before we comment.
It didn’t hit the wall, it hit a berm with navigational equipment. In the US, they did away with berms and have breakaway equipment for this reason. The wall is still intact.
Agreed, I saw many ppl saying that the plane landing on the opposite of the runway but please remember the Runway should be operational on both directions, you cant say because the plane made an U-turn thats why it hit the concrete wall, emergency can happen anytime and you can't say airplanes only can land on 1 direction of the runway. The airport design did not follow the regulation. Very sad to know there is a concrete wall there to block the slide of the airplane, if it's just sand or narrow water then perhaps passengers just got minor injured.
The recovery of the black boxes from the aircraft will provide crucial insights into the incident, including pilot conversations and the plane's instrument status.
Why not flying around buying time for emergency preparation and landing in the ocean? They knew there are concrete walls, they knew the speed, everything is manageable if they could decide better!
@CR-sj6px given how fast the plane was going at touchdown, likely they could not do another go around because they can't gain altitude again. Pilot have to risk a landing now or fly into a house. They hit a bird over the airfield, and probably don't have enough power to actually do anything but attempt to land.
The landing may have been smooth, but it was all wrong, no landing gear down, no flaps, no reverse thrusters and landed at the end of the runway at speed, terrible job.
@@alvinalbertmunson5468 My bad. But then 2 out 3 for the company with a bad record over the last decade... This seems to be the final nail in the casket.
If CNN had done even the MINIMUM research, he would never have even mentioned Thrust Reversers since the 737 T/R's are mechanically "locked out" unless the main landing gear is down and the tires are rolling on the ground!!
You mean like the railing that prevents cars from going over a cliff? This island is pretty high up in the air from what I have seen before, there is a lot of jagged rocks and such around the coast.
Everyone noticed that we can go three years without any major crashes, and then when one crash happens, there is always another to follow. Why is that?
@@BlingtingSam How? There's a whole air field. Dude had no attempt to slow the plane (broken engine somehow negated landing flaps & landing gears?) and landed at the end of the runway (not where you're normally supposed to touch down) aimed towards the only concrete structure in the area.
The pilots made a perfect emergency landing. The plane hit A steel reinforced concrete barrier at the end of the runway. Everyone should have survived. The engineering company that placed the concrete barrier at the end of the runway should and probably will face criminal charges. There's absolutely no reason for that barrier to be placed in the location it was in. An absolutely pointless and unnecessary waste of human life. CNN is utterly clueless as usual.
Coming in and landing around 200 mph with no wheels is insane. That is still way too fast. The pilot should have did a couple more circles or did some more fuel dumps before landing. Definitely not a perfect emergency landing by any stretch. And from what I also read there were other things they could have done was opening some of the flaps on the wings to help reduce the speed which they didn't do.
@erichchan3 The aircraft was going 150 mph. The main cause of ALL the fatalities was the concrete barrier. Everyone would have survived if it hadn't been there.
@@yuanzhewang5429 because people are stupid, they only comment what they see on the TV, they can't use their brains, they see a plane hitting a wall and they say "the wall is criminal", if they landed outside of the airport and hit a house those same people would say that the house was criminal and why was a house there. Of course it was a very bad landing, the pilot forgot many things (I don't know if he panicked or if it was a mechanical problem), and to begin with you don't land at 2/3 of the runway at full speed, that's suicide.
I just came back on a flight from Asia for the first time. This gives me nightmares. I'm probably not flying again for several years. Condolences to all the victims in South Korea. 🙏
Those runway antennas did not need a steel reinforced concrete wall to support it. Many international airports have such systems without any concrete structure protruding out of the ground. Adding such is insane.. you can clearly see steel rebar inside the destroyed concrete wall… it’s crazy.
So you're saying that the plane should go around first and do the opposite landing when it's literally already an emergency? What are you a perfectionist? That absolutely makes no sense
It's sad how 2024 started with a plane accident and now ending with a plane accident. My condolences to the family and friends who lost loved ones to this accident. 😞
Unpopular opinion. I think they forgot to put the gear down. I've seen this happen on a military cargo plane that didn't even have an emergency. They have mechanical overrides for the gear that unlocks it and gravity allows it to extend. The video shows no mains and no nose gear doors open. We will soon know after the data recorders are read. RIP to all the souls aboard.
I think you're right. It's happened many times. There would have had to have been multiple system failures to be completely unable to lower the gear. Plus they landed far too quickly after the initial incident to have thoroughly gone through all checklists. We'll find out eventually but I'm afraid there may have been pilot error. I hope not though.
Additionally, that plane coming from the south was cleared to land on runway 1, from the south. Strangely, it tried to land on runway 19, from the north. Note that runway 1 and runway 19 are in fact the same runway, just a different direction.
The thing is that aircraft are supposed to land on the other side of the way. With time limitation or emergency situation, captain decided to land opposite way of the runway cuz there was no time to land on the right side I guess.... I offer sincere condolences to victims..
@ runways should be in line to take landings from both ways . Particularly for situations like this. This is negligence at the highest level. Im no expert in that field but common sense i guess .
Thank you for your thoughts and prayers in response to the tragic events in South Korea. South Korea is going through a cold and difficult time like never before. Please pray for Muan and South Korea.
That message to a friend is totally heart breaking... there should be a protocol for scenarios like this. The management on the ground should also think on what to do for this kind of accident.. for sure the pilot and its crew might be on panic mode.. jeju is near to the sea.. they could ask help from the coast guard and navy that they will do the emergency landing at sea so that the navy and the coast guard are there to assist. Condolence to the family who lost their love ones... rip!
I think Richard's analysis is the best I have heard so far from all the channels that are showing and will be showing the accident in the following days.
It’s realy weird how none of the news stations want to mention the ill placed wall. Now Americans are known for being smart but even we don’t have brick walls at the end of runways . We actually put soil there so in this situation the soil would have stopped the tires of the plane ✈️.
This tragic accident is another prime reason why specialized stopping sand should be in place at the end of runways at certain airports especially at aorports who decide to put concrete walls at the end pf the runway. 150 metres of this stopping sand would have saved all lives on board before they hit the wall
@gregcrotty2472 Those 150 meters were covered in less than 3 seconds. The poured concrete and steel reinforced wall caused all of the fatalities. It was a criminal design.
The plane did land almost or more than half of the runway, but behind the wall there were no houses or anything so I'm pretty sure people would've at least gotten a little injury at most but definitely survived.
my condolences to the poor people in the air crash in south korea. Within 48 hours, two 737-800 experienced landing gears failure, one in south korea, and the other in Norway. are they just coincident. is better to check them all now! safety is most important in our day in day out. 😢
What everyone seems to be missing is ATC should have known the wall was there, it's like they didn't know their own airport and didn't take the time to consider other options. Water, there is a 4km airport north of there. It's very common to slide off the strip in a belly landing. Easier said than done but they also started their slide way too far down the strip
This accident truly shocked the world. After watching the original video, I'm amazed with the person who recorded this video because he/she didn't even scream even after that devastated explosion. He/she witnessed the whole thing. What a lifetime experience.
Please keep in mind that the jet was traveling very fast for a landing, and landed further down the runway than it should have. That it hit the wall under those circumstances should surprise no one. Don't blame the wall, whatever its reasons for being there.
Without the wall it would have hit another wall behind it which would have not stopped the plane and more people would have survived because behind that second wall is grass.
@@joso5554 The airport was in compliance with international standards. There are a lot of things we don't yet know about this crash, but it is clear that the jet landed at least halfway down the runway at a high rate of speed. Had it landed near the beginning of the runway, it should have had enough room to come to a stop before running out of runway. That, along with the fact that the wheels we up, the flaps not set, and time was not taken to prepare the airport for a crash landing tells me that there were multiple issues the pilots were dealing with. The fact that the wall was at least 1000 feet past the end of the runway tells us how fast the jet was traveling.
@@acreativiter Without the cement wall the plane would have gone through the thin and low wall that marks the runaway area. The plane would have slowed down before the houses.
There is no reason for the gear to have remained retracted. None. There are three independent hydraulic systems and the emergency gear release handles are in the floor, located behind and between the pilots. This looks a lot like a panicked aircrew that simply did not follow the emergency procedures. The berm at the end of the runway is absolutely unnecessary and is what killed everyone. Those systems are break-away, here, in the US. I'm a 50 year Aviation technician on heavies.
There are so many questions. Why was the landing gear not deployed, why were the flaps not down, why reverse thrusters were not engaged, and why the plane landed far down the runway? I hope the investigation can shed light on all of these.
Having the audacity to claim that bad weather was a potential cause is the strongest evidence of an irresponsible attitude on the part of the government official who made the statement.
The sad thing is it was a perfect landing by the pilots given the circumstances. What was that wall doing there? Why was the runway not prepared for belly landing is beyond me. My aunt used to be a stewardess 40 years ago and same thing happened to her flight. The runway was sprayed with some sort of foam and a net was deployed at the end of the runway so they all survived. Needless to say she quit afterwards and she's still with us ❤ Condolences to the families in S Korea.
speed is there enemy plus the wall wall and metal has slippery friction therefore drag is low plus friction is low therefore reducing speed will dragging the plane to the runway is impossible. We saw the map there’s a lot of sea water ehy the pilots didn’t go there 😢
I don't think was occasionaned for s bird because two days before the accident the pilot had been reported an emergency and this airplane didn't flight
On this video, at around the 0.09 mark, you can see that he is beyond the airport control tower due to the angle of the video. Go to google maps or whatever, this is MORE THAN HALFWAY down the runway when he touches down!!! This together with no wheels down and no brakes, explains the high speed when they hit that wall. May they all rest in peace.
Ground lift effect from landing without the gear down. The aircraft skimmed just above the runway for more than 1km before touching it. Unfortunately pilots don’t get training for that.
i love when people who have no idea about aviation start talking about things they have no idea about. a bird strike won't damage all 3 hydraulic systems, the flaps were previously deployed, the 737 is perfectly capable of landing one 1 engine, the right thrust reverser was deployed, the 737 has the possibility to lower the landing gear via manual pull handles in the cockpit that doesn't require the use of the hydraulic system. the accident was completely survivable right up until it hit the mahoosive concrete bank t the en of the runway, the question is why was that there there's no requirement to have the antennas built into concrete,
This is a typical 'Swiss cheese' accident, a number of issues prior to landing that contributed to the disaster Engine/compressor stall - on first approach - why did they not continue to land? Rushed approach to land on the opposite runway - why change runways? Unstable approach, too fast, no gear, no flaps, a bird strike would not have caused all these to fail? Way too fast a landing and ground effect float (estimated 200 mph landing) ? What is South Koreas policy on runway Runway End Safety Area (RESA), Stopway clearway? Is it ICAO compliant, was the structure 'deleathalised'? The final 'hole in the cheese' was the ILS localiser structure Flight crew error? Was the Airport Certificated to ICAO SARPs? Tragic accident that could have been avoided at a number of points before the final impact
So very sad. My cousin, a pilot with Malaysian Airlines, says it’s likely pilot error, a lot of these budget airlines would promote pilots with only 4-5 years experience to captain, it’s a minimum of 12 years and at many national airlines 15 years. He thinks the bird strike did take out one engine, the pilots declared an emergency did a go around to land and then accidentally shut off the good engine, panicked when they got no response from what they thought was the good engine and tried to bring the plane in to land halfway down the runway carrying way too much speed and not even going through the landing check list, which is why the landing gear way not even deployed.
That must have been absolutely terrifying, knowing the circumstances and having to land, without landing gear, approaching a brick wall at the same time.
The concrete wall at the end of the runway prevented a happy ending to a scary situation. Now there are 179 families in mourning right now. May the victims RIP. The airport is complicit in the death of all of those people. My thoughts are with the families. My prayers are with them.
I am Korean and my coworker was one of the 179 victims of that accident. I am still in deep sorrow and I think other families feel the same way. I express my deepest condolences to all the victims.
Our condolences to you and your colleagues as well 😢
Condolences on your loss 🙏🏽 Hope the New Year brings Peace, Purpose, some Joy and Prosperity to you and all in your family and country.👍🏽
@@이정우-x8p Deepest condolences to you and the family of your colleague.
@@이정우-x8p I’m so sorry for your coworker and all who died. Prayers.
@이정우-x8p I'm Sorry for your loss, I can only imagine how surreal that has to be for you.
Imagine doing your best to successfully land a jet airliner without landing gear only to see a huge concrete wall in front of you. So stupid.
yes too bad. All the possible electrical issues are superceded by this one fact.
Basically some airports are too close to residential areas and busy highways. If the plane overshot the runway things could be even more catastrophic. It’s poor airport selection sites
Even if there was no concrete wall there, there's still fence in front, and even if the plane survived that fence, there's resident area in front again that could crash the plane, the speed was still high.
@@mosubekore78in front of the fence is another concrete wall
Pilot was com8ng in pretty hot though
My condolences to all who loses their live and families. from Thailand
Imagine all were expecting to crossover to the new year😢
My condolences to the families that lost their loved ones.
i feel sorry for the pilots. they would've been so on edge pulling this off, and probably even felt a glimmer of hope. then they saw the wall.
Having a brick wall at the end of the runway is diabolical
Das rite! Walls are racist.
oversight.house.gov/blog/joe-biden-lied-at-least-15-times-about-his-familys-business-schemes/
I guarantee you everyone was recording and clapping until they hit the wall
It's an embankment of solid ground for the Localizer antennas with concrete foundation uprooted because of the impact.
The airport wall is still a few distance away from that antenna structure.
급박한 상황에서 활주로 반대편에서 동체 착륙했다는것을 알아야 합니다.
ya ,if not the plane will run into a town , stupid comment
This makes me sick to my stomach. Life can be so cruel sometimes. Rest in peace poor souls
Well, we're not supposed to fly, and we did, despite knowing how risky this kind of transport is.
@@PresidentShinra-z7d Flying isn't risky.
@@ruthlessluder yeah? Tell that to the passengers of Jeju.
@@PresidentShinra-z7d That's called cherry picking data point, common mistake and confirmation bias. You have to look at the whole picture.
@@ruthlessluder statistics won't save these people would they?
The plane crash didn’t kill anyone , the barrier at the end of the runway did .
Hello, how are you?
who knows ? plane was rubbing belly with full speed.. even if wall wasn't there it would have gone too far with that speed or if body of plane get damaged due to friction or burst due to sparking.
@@naruto6918 no man not at all , friction slows it down, there are heaps of landings like this , you just need an extra space at the end, you hit dirt and empty land at 90 km/h at the end of a run way you do slow down eventually, even if you hit water or a beach your usually fine.... your forgeting that there is a brick wall 200 metre at the end of the runaway.... most airports have another 1km of empty space and fields or more then wire fences or the ocean
Yes the South Korea government is responsible
It's not at the end. It's at the beginning of the runway.
Dear Family members of the deceased, My deepest sympathies for your loss!! May all their souls rest in eternal peace.
I had hoped that Korea could rise above everything in 2025 after such a challenging 2024. But hearing about this tragedy leaves me heartbroken. My deepest condolences go out to the families of the victims. May they rest in peace.
As a aviation maintainer my self , from what i can see and with the information being put out I would say that the aircraft had a complete hydraulic failure , these aircraft have 2 hydraulic systems and yes the engines provide power to both of those systems. the Boeing 737 does has a redundant hydraulic systems, typically consisting of two separate systems (labeled as System A and System B) to ensure continued functionality even if one system fails; this redundancy is a critical safety feature in aircraft design.
As we can see in the video the aircraft did suffer a bird strike to one of the engines but even with one engine out, the secondary " emergency hydronic system would be enough to lower the landing gear, operate flaps and reverse thrusters. on top of that these planes are equipped with an emergency mechanical system for the landing gear, allowing pilots to manually deploy the gear using a gravity-assisted mechanism in case of total hydraulic failure .
The engines directly provide power to the hydraulic systems by driving engine-driven pumps that generate hydraulic pressure for the aircraft's flight controls and other systems; essentially, when the engines are running, they power the hydraulic pumps which then distribute pressurized fluid throughout the hydraulic system.
In conclusion and in my opinion as others have stated , if the barrier was not at the end of the runway , then the aircraft would have hit the dirt and then would have been slowed down even more. most modern airports have a special section of runway at the end, that is designed to collapse under the weight of the aircraft to slow it down even more. think of it kind of like loose sand , the landing gear would dig in to it and slow the aircraft even more.
now in the event of a total hydraulic failure the pilots would treat this like a water landing, meaning they would not deploy reverse thrusters, why ? well because as shown in the video they only had one engine working, if they deployed reverse thrusters the aircraft would umm lets say" list" to one side or the other due to the uneven thrust on one side. this then would cause the aircraft to tumble and roll and break up . from what's shown , it appears that the pilots are doing every thing correctly , as per there training. also being that they had only one engine IF they did deploy the landing gear they still would not of had the power from the other engine to slow them down enough, despite what people may think , a aircraft doesn't stop by its breaks alone like a car does , the pilots were relying on ground friction to stop them , the sad thing is , is that there was a concrete barrier at the end of the run way .my heart breaks with all of the families of those who died .
I agree with you, the pilots did a great job of landing the plane, and all, or most would have survived if not for the wall. The same thing happened in Jamaica in 2007, everyone survived because there was no wall.
@@thelazarusproject52 Thank you for your long explanations. Appreciated. very informative and educational.❤️
@@thelazarusproject52 remarkable insight. Thank you.
@@thelazarusproject52 Nope. It’s triple. And electrical hydraulic pumps. And actuators. And electrical motors for flaps. And manual drop down of the landing gear. And checklists. And common sense.
Thank you for this
Truly sorry for the poor people who lost their loved ones.
CNN called them all racists, discussion closed....
No!who had a Patton to help the poor on that flight
CNN shouldn't report on real news. It just confuses people because they have such a bad reputation as being fake news.
Not poor.maybe
Zero mention that was another BOEING 737-800 plane that was malfunctioned within 24 hours with only 100 of such planes on earth, one KLM KL1204 flight on 12/28 in Netherland (Hydraulic System failure), and another on 12/29 in S. Korea (possible Hydraulic System failure). What's the odd of that? BOEING must have paid a lot of PR for all these so called reporters/experts not to question about BOEING's planes. Especially given, two former BOEING engineer & quality control technician turn whistleblowers exposed frequent Boeing malpractice and they were dead the day before they can testify in court! Enough said!
Heartbroken for those families. What more can you say, really. Just devastating.
Hello how are you doing 😊
Hello 👋👋
Such a sophisticated country that puts concrete walls at the end of the runway???
Zero mention that was another BOEING 737-800 plane that was malfunctioned within 24 hours with only 100 of such planes on earth, one KLM KL1204 flight on 12/28 in Netherland (Hydraulic System failure), and another on 12/29 in S. Korea (possible Hydraulic System failure). What's the odd of that? BOEING must have paid a lot of PR for all these so called reporters/experts not to question about BOEING's planes. Especially given, two former BOEING engineer & quality control technician turn whistleblowers exposed frequent Boeing malpractice and they were dead the day before they can testify in court! Enough said!
@@YCHTTwhat about the one that said off the runway in Oslo?
stupid is as stupid does
But the wall didn’t cause the plane to malfunction and skid off the runway. We need to understand why this happened instead of only blaming the object it struck.
Some facts:
The concrete wall/localizer was more than 1000ft/300meters from the end of the runway and it complies with international aviation law. Beyond the wall there is a ditch, a street and buildings. So even if the wall wasn’t there, it would have still been a disaster.
@@YCHTT This is whta happen when you talk garbage without any knowledge Boeing did a lot of bad shit with the 737Max and the 787 but in this case have 0 responsibility this aircraft is the 2 most popular aircraft variant in the world and has been used for 30 years with one of the best safe track records.
My sincere condolences to the families of those killed by this horrific tragedy
I cant imagine the pain of the families its very heart breaking
そうですか
Prepare yourself for the imaginable.
Get ready to get a shit ton of money
That’s terrible.. the 2 that lived may have the strongest case of survivors guilt…
Condolences.
Oh absolutely. I know I would be filled with guilt. Gratefulness but also guilt. And trauma. All kinds of feelings…
Knowing the Koreans. That two...
Sympathy and trauma yes but guilt? They are not responsible for the crash. What could they have done to stop it and save others?
@@2020umakemydayThat isn’t the point of survivor’s guilt.
@@InterstateJ Mera case itna strong ki sb evidence h lekin police wale bolte h paise lo nahi toh FIR karenge lekin aaj wahi kiya unhone
Oh God! Prayers for family members, and those who were lost. I can't even imagine.
kyle
The Greek Jesus God, Putin you meant ?
Pray for ALLAH ????
What are you on about @@lucasrem
I offer my condolences from Türkiye for the accident that occurred in South Korea...🇰🇷🇹🇷
If even one small bird can cause catastrophic damage to a plane in flight why have they not designed some kind of mechanism shield for the engines or components by now? They’re basically saying even a small single bird can cause a plane to crash!!!! Look it up. I’m never flying again.
@@keeliekalayidol8876 it’s not like that - aviation is safe. Safer than driving for example. A small single bird as you said cannot be the sole cause for a disaster to happen - it’s cascading sequence of events that happens and bird strike was just one of them. And I’m a pilot, trust me, we and the engineers have thought about your question about shielding the engine components with some sort of mechanism that will prevent birdstrikes or any type of damage. We have engine nacelles but the fan blades can’t be covered with anything because it will disrupt the airflow and the angle of attack of the blades, and ultimately will render the engine inop. That’s the reality - with aviation physics ifs always this way, you can’t get something good without also getting something bad. Like generating lift causes induced drag, etc.
The plane has no fire whatsoever while on its belly, the fire or explosion only happened when they hit that concrete wall for whatever that was supposed to me. It got me thinking maybe there was a possibility that not that many people would die if that reinforce concrete was not at the end of the run away...
Would die? Just how ignorant are you of English verb tenses?
What video did you watch? You can see the glow from flames under the plane when it goes past the person recording
@@RalphBarrera That's sparks and that would've mitigated if the ground crew had any time to deploy fire retardant on the runway. Either way, the explosion would've happened regardless of whether or not the sparks was present.
WEll what's behind it...
@@seriousorganizer If there is something important behind that wall then the airport's design was quite foolish. I've certainly never seen something like that anywhere near a runway. One would assume for this exact reason.
No flaps, slats, elevators, air brakes...amazing how the pilots could even touch down they way they did
All flight controls on the 737 except the rudder can be fully controlled manually via cables without any hydraulics. They had elevator control, and this can be seen in how small adjustments were made to the landing attitude. Ingesting a bird doesn't typically cause full loss of hydraulics, and gear can be released mechanically. Flaps can be extended electrically if no hydraulics are present. This is going to be a very interesting accident report.
To do all that manually you need 10 minutes to complete a check list, I'm afraid they didn't had 10 minutes
They had reverse
@@SciFly7 One thing is certain, an accident with airliner will always consist of multiple factors. Normally combination of pilot training, CRM, maintenence, series of unfortunate external event and the surface condition. So, yeah agreed with your comment. It will be interesting for sure on their final report. Condolences to the family of the victims in this flight.
easy just have to land 50% faster than normal landing speed for a 737 its not too bad its a medium size plane i think its about 160km with flaps and 240 km hour with no flaps landing speed . It would slow down eventually touching down at 240km hour even without brakes
All was actually going practically OK up until the plane met the wall.
If all was well, it would not have hit the wall...
Um no. This plane likely could have landed just fine. Why didn’t they manually put down the gear? Even if they lost both engines, which I don’t think, they could still have put gear down.
@@justsomecommie2638 its called an emergency landing for a reason, what you want Toyoto and Honda to start making cars with no parking brakes next and call it user error when people start dying
@@MetsterAnnthey either panicked… and were close to the ground and proceeded with the belly landing?
It was moving way too fast for a safe landing besides not being configured for that. Looks like the pilots might have been hit by another bird and some window pieces.
What’s truly malicious about that airport is how they concealed concrete structures beneath dirt piles. Had the concrete been visible, the pilot would have avoided that runway.
Deepest condolences to the victims who lost their precious lives
All the love for the beautiful people of South Korea. Stay strong, brighter days ahead ❤️
I honestly abhor this morbid obsession on day 1 of every such disaster. Investigators will do their job, sort it out and make aviation safer tomorrow. That’s it, tomorrow.
Today you have broken families and a society with a shattered morale after all they have been through in recent weeks. Our hearts and thoughts should be with them. Call your Korean friend, tell them you love them and be there for them.
why you cry here ?
@@mathewwilson9776 Marshall law was a myth and brought on by the leftist lunatics if you really know the full story. Marshall law isn't always what you people think it is.
The plane looked like it landed ok probably saving everyone inside but when it hit that concrete wall at that speed well no one had a chance at that point. ...Tragic. Rip to those souls lost.😢
The same thing happened in Jamaica in 2007, everyone survived because there was no wall.
!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣
exactly
@@lawrencedavidson6195 same thing air france flight 358 in 2005 at pearson airport, there was no wall and it crashed into a creek, the whole plane was destroyed but everyone lived
@@mask7571 thanks, i had forgotten about that crash.
who's the genius that decided to build a reinforced concrete wall at the end of the runway?
Mine . It is the way
韓国人 korean
People that knew a run away jet would then travel into the town..
Its a dirt wall...
@@011keepersexcept there's no town on the other side, just a road, some fields, the beach and the ocean.
I am Korean.
2024 is a very difficult year for Koreans It's so sad and heartbreaking😢
Please continue to pay attention to this accident so that the truth can be accurately investigated.
Thank you for all your consolation to Koreans..
if I may ask, why saying so ? what else happened in 2024 ?
Lots of lives were ended and yet everyone in the comment section became soooooo knowledgeable about being a pilot and/or designers of an aircraft 👌
Condolences to the families affected.
The experienced pilots and engineers are here. We just try to ignore idiots who have no idea what they are talking about. Also the fools in the media. We are waiting for the CVR and FDR to be read and a preliminary report with information to be released before we comment.
Built the wall at the end of the runway was a terrible mistake.
It was the opposite side of the runway.
긴급한 착륙이었기에 180도 돌아서 착륙한거예요
They didn't build a wall at the end of the runway... 🙄 It was an ILS berm, beyond what is technically the beginning side of the runway.
It didn’t hit the wall, it hit a berm with navigational equipment. In the US, they did away with berms and have breakaway equipment for this reason. The wall is still intact.
Agreed, I saw many ppl saying that the plane landing on the opposite of the runway but please remember the Runway should be operational on both directions, you cant say because the plane made an U-turn thats why it hit the concrete wall, emergency can happen anytime and you can't say airplanes only can land on 1 direction of the runway. The airport design did not follow the regulation. Very sad to know there is a concrete wall there to block the slide of the airplane, if it's just sand or narrow water then perhaps passengers just got minor injured.
The recovery of the black boxes from the aircraft will provide crucial insights into the incident, including pilot conversations and the plane's instrument status.
Only to find out that they werent recording for the last 30min. Just a guess.
From the way the plane skidded on the runway the pilots did a perfect job of getting the plane down safely. it was that stupid wall.
The same thing happened in Jamaica in 2007, everyone survived because there was no wall.
Why not flying around buying time for emergency preparation and landing in the ocean? They knew there are concrete walls, they knew the speed, everything is manageable if they could decide better!
Somehow you think bird strikes are mosquito strikes @@CR-sj6pxthat they can just shrug it off and go for another try, interesting
@@CR-sj6px landing in the ocean, are you serious !!!! Get a grip !!!
@CR-sj6px given how fast the plane was going at touchdown, likely they could not do another go around because they can't gain altitude again. Pilot have to risk a landing now or fly into a house. They hit a bird over the airfield, and probably don't have enough power to actually do anything but attempt to land.
My sympathies to all who lost their lives on that flight 🙏🙏🙏
I am moved to tears watching this video with deep sadness at the tragedy that befell everyone on board the plane. May their souls rest in peace.
THE MAIN CULPRIT IS THAT WALL AT THE END OF THE RUNWAY! THE LANDING WAS ACTUALLY SMOOTH.
Runway, Samsung did it ?
I never trust them, just bad crab !
People said the pilot forgotten to put gear down because of the bird strike
The landing may have been smooth, but it was all wrong, no landing gear down, no flaps, no reverse thrusters and landed at the end of the runway at speed, terrible job.
The landing may have been botched but people would have survived if it were not for that concrete wall
정말 슬픈 하루가 지나갔습니다. 명복을 빕니다.
rest in peace thinking of the victim's families
Why a reinforced concrete wall at the end of the airport runway?
여기서도 모기짓하노
One of the worst things that couls happen before new year, there is nothing you can say that could help a family dealing with this
People who are gone , rest in peace !!! I prey the god to give strength to the family who have lost their loved ones...
3 Boeings in a day? Must be a record in aviation history.
3? its 2
@@AhnafAdil-dh8qk
1.Jeju
2.Air canada
3.Norway
@AhnafAdil-dh8qk Canada and Norway each have the same problem on the same day. I am not including the Kazakhstan which happened a day earlier.
@@dukecheng5409Canada and Kazakhtan were not boeing aircrafts
@@alvinalbertmunson5468 My bad. But then 2 out 3 for the company with a bad record over the last decade... This seems to be the final nail in the casket.
Richard Quest isn't qualified to give an informed opinion. Exceptionally weak understanding of the aircraft and it's operation.
Yeah I was like wait he’s not an aviation expert
@@jenw5557 Correct - I have no idea why CNN puts this guy on the air as an "aviation expert" ?
Never mind the dim questions from the anchor!
If CNN had done even the MINIMUM research, he would never have even mentioned Thrust Reversers since the 737 T/R's are mechanically "locked out" unless the main landing gear is down and the tires are rolling on the ground!!
@@griff40532they must be desperate.
What a loss, may God have mercy on all the souls. Amen.
This was not a plane crash. It was a vehicle crashing into a fixed obstruction that should not have been there.
… so a plane crash.
😂
This is a stupid statement
You mean like the railing that prevents cars from going over a cliff? This island is pretty high up in the air from what I have seen before, there is a lot of jagged rocks and such around the coast.
Dude, that wasn’t the runway-it was the opposite side of it.
Everyone noticed that we can go three years without any major crashes, and then when one crash happens, there is always another to follow. Why is that?
My condolences to victims family and friends.
The pilot managed to bring the plane down safely but the concrete wall was an obstacle .
Not safely. It was virtually flying on the runway due to speed, no flaps. spoiters extended etc.
So don't bring it down towards a concrete wall
@@kylespevak6781 what a dumb sentence.
@@BlingtingSam How? There's a whole air field. Dude had no attempt to slow the plane (broken engine somehow negated landing flaps & landing gears?) and landed at the end of the runway (not where you're normally supposed to touch down) aimed towards the only concrete structure in the area.
The pilots made a perfect emergency landing. The plane hit
A steel reinforced concrete barrier at the end of the runway. Everyone should have survived. The engineering company that placed the concrete barrier at the end of the runway should and probably will face criminal charges. There's absolutely no reason for that barrier to be placed in the location it was in. An absolutely pointless and unnecessary waste of human life. CNN is utterly clueless as usual.
Coming in and landing around 200 mph with no wheels is insane. That is still way too fast. The pilot should have did a couple more circles or did some more fuel dumps before landing. Definitely not a perfect emergency landing by any stretch. And from what I also read there were other things they could have done was opening some of the flaps on the wings to help reduce the speed which they didn't do.
Why would the engineering company be punished?
They just make the thing, whoever decided this idea should go ahead will be at fault
It is not perfect. They missed the 2/3 of the runway and landed on the last 1/3
Speaking of clueless, that 'barrier' is the base of the runway localizer. It's the S Korean govt and civil aviation authorities who are responsible.
@erichchan3 The aircraft was going 150 mph. The main cause of ALL the fatalities was the concrete barrier. Everyone would have survived if it hadn't been there.
The pilot skills and professionalism...👏 He handle the situation with such grace and precision but the dam wall 😡
He did what, everything was wrong with this landing completely wrong.
@@commonsense-grsPeople will keep saying what that saw but ignore how much mistakes happened before landing.
@@yuanzhewang5429 because people are stupid, they only comment what they see on the TV, they can't use their brains, they see a plane hitting a wall and they say "the wall is criminal", if they landed outside of the airport and hit a house those same people would say that the house was criminal and why was a house there.
Of course it was a very bad landing, the pilot forgot many things (I don't know if he panicked or if it was a mechanical problem), and to begin with you don't land at 2/3 of the runway at full speed, that's suicide.
Cringe
As a 47 year pilot I see too many mistakes from lack of proper training .
Like building a dirt and concrete embankment right in the axis of the runway and only 200m after the threshold ??
Quite a mistake indeed…
The issue is these American birds types
I just came back on a flight from Asia for the first time. This gives me nightmares. I'm probably not flying again for several years. Condolences to all the victims in South Korea. 🙏
Those runway antennas did not need a steel reinforced concrete wall to support it. Many international airports have such systems without any concrete structure protruding out of the ground. Adding such is insane.. you can clearly see steel rebar inside the destroyed concrete wall… it’s crazy.
To be fair the wall is at the start of the runway, not the end. The plane landed in the opposite direction.
it should be a chain link fence NEVER a concrete wall
So you're saying that the plane should go around first and do the opposite landing when it's literally already an emergency? What are you a perfectionist? That absolutely makes no sense
This wall makes no sense
It's sad how 2024 started with a plane accident and now ending with a plane accident. My condolences to the family and friends who lost loved ones to this accident. 😞
Thank you Richard for your comments. I'm from South Korea and your explanation helps us to grasp the situation a little bit better.
Unpopular opinion. I think they forgot to put the gear down. I've seen this happen on a military cargo plane that didn't even have an emergency. They have mechanical overrides for the gear that unlocks it and gravity allows it to extend. The video shows no mains and no nose gear doors open. We will soon know after the data recorders are read. RIP to all the souls aboard.
I think you're right. It's happened many times. There would have had to have been multiple system failures to be completely unable to lower the gear. Plus they landed far too quickly after the initial incident to have thoroughly gone through all checklists. We'll find out eventually but I'm afraid there may have been pilot error. I hope not though.
Additionally, that plane coming from the south was cleared to land on runway 1, from the south. Strangely, it tried to land on runway 19, from the north. Note that runway 1 and runway 19 are in fact the same runway, just a different direction.
Wow, that would help to explain the excessive speed... they were landing with a tailwind!
Richard you forgot to tell about the block wall end of the runway. Which is the only reason all those peoples lives lost.
A "Witch" is a evil spirit that conjures up magic and spells. "Which", however, is the word that you should've used.
The thing is that aircraft are supposed to land on the other side of the way.
With time limitation or emergency situation, captain decided to land opposite way of the runway cuz there was no time to land on the right side I guess....
I offer sincere condolences to victims..
@ runways should be in line to take landings from both ways . Particularly for situations like this. This is negligence at the highest level. Im no expert in that field but common sense i guess .
@@동글동그라미-k3rI guess that you don't know that "airCRAFT" IS BOTH SINGULAR and PLURAL (with no "s" needed to indicate more than one).
@@centralplains7608 Oh thank u
Thank you for your thoughts and prayers in response to the tragic events in South Korea. South Korea is going through a cold and difficult time like never before. Please pray for Muan and South Korea.
That message to a friend is totally heart breaking... there should be a protocol for scenarios like this. The management on the ground should also think on what to do for this kind of accident.. for sure the pilot and its crew might be on panic mode.. jeju is near to the sea.. they could ask help from the coast guard and navy that they will do the emergency landing at sea so that the navy and the coast guard are there to assist. Condolence to the family who lost their love ones... rip!
Praying for the families of the victims of the plane crash and the other two that survived the crash
Birds did not cause the landing gear to fail. The weather was not bad.
👽
Allah, Putin, both !
@@princesativa8191how did you know you right 5 craches already in this week
That was a perfect landing. But suddenly, wall.
That was a perfect landing, no, terrible landing everything was wrong.
He landed more than halfway down the runway, far from a perfect landing.
!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣
That man‘s demeanor, voice, intonation and general vibe are incredibly uncomfortable
Which man?
Notice how they cut the video just before the plane hits the wall and blows up
I think Richard's analysis is the best I have heard so far from all the channels that are showing and will be showing the accident in the following days.
It’s realy weird how none of the news stations want to mention the ill placed wall. Now Americans are known for being smart but even we don’t have brick walls at the end of runways . We actually put soil there so in this situation the soil would have stopped the tires of the plane ✈️.
what tires?
This tragic accident is another prime reason why specialized stopping sand should be in place at the end of runways at certain airports especially at aorports who decide to put concrete walls at the end pf the runway. 150 metres of this stopping sand would have saved all lives on board before they hit the wall
No it wouldn’t
@gregcrotty2472 Those 150 meters were covered in less than 3 seconds. The poured concrete and steel reinforced wall caused all of the fatalities. It was a criminal design.
@@nat9909 Yes it was a bad design, but EMAS arrestor beds would have helped.
What a horrible month for Korea, political crisis then this tradegy, prayers and condolences for South Korea 🙏
Pray for the Greek Putin Jesus, why so evil ?
Birds, muhahahaha, CNN will just call it racism
The plane did land almost or more than half of the runway, but behind the wall there were no houses or anything so I'm pretty sure people would've at least gotten a little injury at most but definitely survived.
Need to hold criminally liable for the brilliant expert who placed a wall at end of the runway.
So sad 😞. Condolences 💐
my condolences to the poor people in the air crash in south korea. Within 48 hours, two 737-800 experienced landing gears failure, one in south korea, and the other in Norway. are they just coincident. is better to check them all now! safety is most important in our day in day out. 😢
What everyone seems to be missing is ATC should have known the wall was there, it's like they didn't know their own airport and didn't take the time to consider other options. Water, there is a 4km airport north of there. It's very common to slide off the strip in a belly landing. Easier said than done but they also started their slide way too far down the strip
Prayers for the victims and their families.
This accident truly shocked the world. After watching the original video, I'm amazed with the person who recorded this video because he/she didn't even scream even after that devastated explosion. He/she witnessed the whole thing. What a lifetime experience.
Are you serious? Those are the recordings of airport cameras
Please keep in mind that the jet was traveling very fast for a landing, and landed further down the runway than it should have. That it hit the wall under those circumstances should surprise no one. Don't blame the wall, whatever its reasons for being there.
Agree but the concrete obstacle is what disrupted the aircraft and killed 179 people… normally there is never such a solid obstacle beyond the runway.
Without the wall it would have hit another wall behind it which would have not stopped the plane and more people would have survived because behind that second wall is grass.
@@joso5554 The airport was in compliance with international standards. There are a lot of things we don't yet know about this crash, but it is clear that the jet landed at least halfway down the runway at a high rate of speed. Had it landed near the beginning of the runway, it should have had enough room to come to a stop before running out of runway. That, along with the fact that the wheels we up, the flaps not set, and time was not taken to prepare the airport for a crash landing tells me that there were multiple issues the pilots were dealing with. The fact that the wall was at least 1000 feet past the end of the runway tells us how fast the jet was traveling.
@tr11_
There are roads and other obstacles, speed was too much. Not having a wall wouldn’t necessarily have avoided it tragedy.
@@acreativiter Without the cement wall the plane would have gone through the thin and low wall that marks the runaway area. The plane would have slowed down before the houses.
The world asking same questions. What happened? Why there's a concrete wall in the end of runway?....etc..
Praying for the families.. 💔
There is no reason for the gear to have remained retracted. None. There are three independent hydraulic systems and the emergency gear release handles are in the floor, located behind and between the pilots. This looks a lot like a panicked aircrew that simply did not follow the emergency procedures. The berm at the end of the runway is absolutely unnecessary and is what killed everyone. Those systems are break-away, here, in the US. I'm a 50 year Aviation technician on heavies.
If people knew what really happened to that airplane they would be chocked to the core.
The plane did NOT hit the perimeter wall. It hit a berm that supported the ILS antennas, well short of the perimeter wall.
it's really crazy how nobody is talking about the book the elite society's money manifestation, it changed my life
Birds don’t fail the landing gear or the entire hydraulic system. Ill be very interested to see for what reason they landed without gear
There are so many questions. Why was the landing gear not deployed, why were the flaps not down, why reverse thrusters were not engaged, and why the plane landed far down the runway? I hope the investigation can shed light on all of these.
What is difficult for people to accept is they saw it landing intact gliding all alive only to see it crash on a giant concrete wall. Really wasted.
These pilots should have been able to bring the plane down safely - and there is a reason why they couldn’t - anxious to know what happen… prayers..
they forgot to lower the landing gear then added power to take off
@@justininvestor You can't forget - the warning horn is WAY too loud.
@@CockpitScenes On my plane horn is triggered by low air speed his landong
config looks way to fast.
Weird how someone was able to video the bird crashing to the plane. I feel like this accident has something political to it.
Having the audacity to claim that bad weather was a potential cause is the strongest evidence of an irresponsible attitude on the part of the government official who made the statement.
The sad thing is it was a perfect landing by the pilots given the circumstances. What was that wall doing there? Why was the runway not prepared for belly landing is beyond me. My aunt used to be a stewardess 40 years ago and same thing happened to her flight. The runway was sprayed with some sort of foam and a net was deployed at the end of the runway so they all survived. Needless to say she quit afterwards and she's still with us ❤
Condolences to the families in S Korea.
So sad ! May their soul rest in peace!
If they had not missed 1/3 of the runway, they would probably have made it.
Long flare because of Ground Effect and most pilots aren’t prepared for it unless they’re experienced in sail planes.
speed is there enemy plus the wall
wall and metal has slippery friction therefore
drag is low plus friction is low therefore reducing speed will dragging the plane to the runway is impossible. We saw the map there’s a lot of sea water ehy the pilots didn’t go there 😢
I don't think was occasionaned for s bird because two days before the accident the pilot had been reported an emergency and this airplane didn't flight
That concrete wall at the end of the run way is criminal. Hope the families sue the airport.
Deepest sympathy for all the families who lost loved ones.
On this video, at around the 0.09 mark, you can see that he is beyond the airport control tower due to the angle of the video. Go to google maps or whatever, this is MORE THAN HALFWAY down the runway when he touches down!!! This together with no wheels down and no brakes, explains the high speed when they hit that wall. May they all rest in peace.
Ground lift effect from landing without the gear down. The aircraft skimmed just above the runway for more than 1km before touching it. Unfortunately pilots don’t get training for that.
i love when people who have no idea about aviation start talking about things they have no idea about. a bird strike won't damage all 3 hydraulic systems, the flaps were previously deployed, the 737 is perfectly capable of landing one 1 engine, the right thrust reverser was deployed, the 737 has the possibility to lower the landing gear via manual pull handles in the cockpit that doesn't require the use of the hydraulic system.
the accident was completely survivable right up until it hit the mahoosive concrete bank t the en of the runway, the question is why was that there there's no requirement to have the antennas built into concrete,
Correct! The same thing happened in Jamaica in 2007, everyone survived because there was no wall.
Right and the fact that no one’s talking about the wall like they think we’re idiots.
This is a typical 'Swiss cheese' accident, a number of issues prior to landing that contributed to the disaster
Engine/compressor stall - on first approach - why did they not continue to land?
Rushed approach to land on the opposite runway - why change runways?
Unstable approach, too fast, no gear, no flaps, a bird strike would not have caused all these to fail?
Way too fast a landing and ground effect float (estimated 200 mph landing) ?
What is South Koreas policy on runway Runway End Safety Area (RESA), Stopway clearway? Is it ICAO compliant, was the structure 'deleathalised'?
The final 'hole in the cheese' was the ILS localiser structure
Flight crew error?
Was the Airport Certificated to ICAO SARPs?
Tragic accident that could have been avoided at a number of points before the final impact
So very sad. My cousin, a pilot with Malaysian Airlines, says it’s likely pilot error, a lot of these budget airlines would promote pilots with only 4-5 years experience to captain, it’s a minimum of 12 years and at many national airlines 15 years. He thinks the bird strike did take out one engine, the pilots declared an emergency did a go around to land and then accidentally shut off the good engine, panicked when they got no response from what they thought was the good engine and tried to bring the plane in to land halfway down the runway carrying way too much speed and not even going through the landing check list, which is why the landing gear way not even deployed.
Bingo. That's exactly correct and the investigation will determine that. Count on it.
That must have been absolutely terrifying, knowing the circumstances and having to land, without landing gear, approaching a brick wall at the same time.
The concrete wall at the end of the runway prevented a happy ending to a scary situation. Now there are 179 families in mourning right now. May the victims RIP. The airport is complicit in the death of all of those people. My thoughts are with the families. My prayers are with them.