Islam gives us a free hand to adopt a political system compatible with our society meeting the requisite principles advocated by Islam as justice, tolerance, freedom and govern by consultation etc.
Dear prof.. Four Imams of jurisprudence were living under duress and oppression of the ummayad and Abbasid ,,Maliks,,They faced unimaginable atrocities and persecution from the rulers .even for voicing minimal amount of dissent and refusing to become chief justice.. How they could have written about the political and economic system which would have been deemed by those vindictive and bloodthirsty monarchs as detrimental to their political and economic hegemony
رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ والہ وسلم کے دور میں ہی 9 ہجری میں ہی پورا سعودی عرب، یمن، اومان اور متحدہ عرب امارات اسلامی ریاست کا حصہ بن چکے تھے. مطلب کہ اس وقت بھی شہری ریاست سے زیادہ بڑھ چکی تھی. حضور اکرم صلی اللہ علیہ والہ وسلم نے مجلس شوریٰ کا ادارا قائم کر چکے تھے. اس شوری نے پہلے خلیفہ ابوبکر صدیق رضی اللہ عنہ کو خلیفہ مقرر کیا تھا. اس کے بعد ابوبکر کے حکم سے حضرت عمر رضی اللہ عنہ کو انہی کی حیاتی میں شوری نے اپنا دوسرا خلیفہ بنا لیا تھا. یہی طریقہ آگے تک چلتا رہا.
In small Country like Austria , We have 9 Provences and 49 sectors , as I know in 1975 it has Population of 7,3 Million , now it has about 9 Million only , Pakistan need at least 40 Provinces anf 400 Counties,
1) In todays world still it is possible to destroy well equipped,well trained and well developed (taraqqi yaafta) army of 45 countries without having technology and equipment in Afghanistan 2)I totally agree with you that muslim monarchy started after the Era of Hazrat Ali and Imam Hassan, but you are mixing the Islamic monarchy+ more than 5 fiqs and Mullayiat with socio-politico system of Islam 3) if we have to look the socio-politico system of Islam we have to look back from 5 + fiqs till to Muhammad (S.A.W) era 4)for example islamic law says that "interest" (sood) is battle with Allah and prophet, cut the hand of thief, capital punishment and many others... this is what muslims are asking for 5) I totally agree with you that IJTEHAAD is till the day judgement 6)As far as Allam iqbal`s philosophy is concerned, i hope you would have an understanding about how much he has written against western democracy, imperialism, capitalism and SOOD 7) Pillars of western democracy are today`s banking system making rich people more richer and poor people more poorer , Capitalism and Political "FIRQA WAARIYAT".
1. Afghanistan didnt defeat the 45 countries, nor those 45 countries entirely made their army invade afghanistan, afghanistan was under control of the US for 20 years and kept taliban at shoe, because of domestic problems and taliban recruits from different countries + they had more problems to deal with, they left afghanistan 2. there is no socio-political system in Islam, you may have heard the hadith that one man went to Muhammad PBUH for judgement, then went to Umar, this proves it 3. It was the right of the individual if he wanted to take which judging method, the jew one, christian one, islamic one etc in the time of Muhammad (PBUH), it was not imposed like state law, state law was brought by colonial powers and now is the system only. Now you may ask, "but a person can leave his faith just to avoid the punishment", this further proves that religion is a matter of Man and God, nobady else can intervene
Even choosing the Caliph became quite an issue when one study Islamic history. It hadn't been that simple. Splitting of Islam into two main and foremost sects ie Shiaism and Sunnism is an evident example of what I am saying. (Food for thought from history itself)
Excellent work however would have been better if discussed in concrete terms about taxes tax collection and about islamic laws in times of prophet and so on and on ---- concrete info is lacking however prof sahib has the talent and knowledge to put more light on judicial system plus laws plus taxes and tax collection
in true islam" namaz means system ensuring equality in providing security and safety of honour, wealth and life of all is equal; roza means, every man and woman are bound to have war training to fight in the days of wars. zakat means share happiness and sorrows with each other; hajj means stage a jihad against who attack a muslim state. a muslim is who believe on equality with aiman on Hazrat Muhammad PBUH as messenger of God and God is alone.
Thora parh lejeya ga comment. Mohtram Nehayat moazrat aap naqis malomat ko baghair kisi reference k phailay ja rahy hain aik example 300 saal printing press pr pabandi rahi khudara kuch to kheyal karain agr aap ya bat kr rahy hain k printing press pr pabandi rahi ya q nai btaty k q rahi ar kiss cheez ki printing pr pabandi rahi so samaeen sun lain almukhtasir us daur m esai pop ny apny aik follower k zariya naooz billah quran m tahareef karwain ar unko print krwana shoro kr deya ar jb ya tehreef shuda nuskha usamniyo k pass pohncha to unho ny es tarah k tamam nuskhy ikathy keya ar wo tamam printing press Jo quran k en nuskho ki printing kr rahy thy un par pabandi sirf es hd tk lagai k wo quran qareem print nahi karain gy baqi sub print hota rha ar quran ki printing k leya k leya jamia process bnaya gya taky tahareef shuda nuskho ki mazeed printing na ho saky ar jin logo k literature parh k aap reviews dy rahy hain kash k aap ya bhi parh ar samjh lety k un logo Nabi pak (S.A.W.W) k bary m Kya kheyalat thy jis literature ki summary aap bary methy alfaaz m beyan kr rahy hain ar gumraah kr rahy hain khudara ya zulm na karain. Bàat bohat lambi ho jay g parhny waly k leya lekin mjhy aapky nazriya ki kuch samjh zaror a gai .....
Sir, Allah ho akbr, matlb ap jo Kuch bol rahy Hain ospr daleel bahoot zarori hai , imamon NY politics ko bahoot achy se bataya hai even Nabi Kareem saw my politics pr bahoot taweel tariky se samjhaya hai I think wo kitaben ap tak pahnchi Nahi mujhe address inbox kijiye will send you
Salam professor can you please give me your opinion about Ayatullah Sheikh Muhammad Kazim Khurasani He is known for using his position as a Marja as legitimizing force behind the first democratic revolution of Asia that happened in Iran (1905-1911), where he was the main clerical supporter of the revolution. He believed that the democratic form of government is what Islam says as well and it will be the the best choice in the absence of Imam and regarded the democratic constitutional revolution a Jihad (holy war) in which all Muslims had to participate. Along with Mirza Husayn Tehrani and Shaikh Abdallah Mazandarani, he led people against what they called a "state tyranny", issued fatwas, and "sent telegrams to tribal chiefs, prominent national and political leaders, and heads of state in England, France, Germany, and Turkey". When Mohammad Ali Shah became king of Iran, Mohammad Kazim Khorasani sent him a 'ten-point' instruction including points on protecting Islam, promoting domestic industries and modern science, stopping colonial intervention in Iran 'while retaining diplomatic relations', and establishing 'justice and equality'
Amazing .... U have amazing skill of telling conservatives that , man it's time to move on ... Hope more and more people listen to u rather than looking for answers to modern day problems in Religious books ...
Assalamualaikum main iindia se hun aap allama shibli nomani ki alfarooq kitaab ek bar padho usme aap ko maloom hoga ke Hazrat Umar ne kaise khilafat chalai
Sir, i want to you to make this islamic shariah series videos in English language because it's so informative. Most of the people including me are facing difficulties in finding exact words of english to explain this concept
Ma sha Allah you are trying your best to convey the knowledge you have. But i would like to correct one thing k aap islamic political system ko sirf haakim choose krnay k process tk mehdood kr rh hen jb k ye nizam basically is nuktay pr based hai k islami nizam me legislator sirf Allah ki zaat hai, jis me ehkam e ilahi nafiz hon, ksi insan ki ijazat ki zaroorat nai ho un k nafaaz k liye. Aur isi trha jamhooriyat wo nizam hai jis me a group of people is the legislator aur is group ki ijazat k bger ehkam e ilahi b nafiz nai ho sktay. These systems are not merely the processes to choose the haakim. Ap pehlay poora context deeply study kren phr apna view samnay rkhen q k already log is difference ko nai smjhtay aur wo mazeed ghalat.fehmi ka shikaar ho jatay hen
Hareem madam ... in laws ko execute krny wali authority b honi chyia or wo khalifa ha ... legislative procedure goes to Allah Almighty pr ab wahi ni a skti,hm kese west ko compete kr skty hn ...so respected sir already proclaimed that IJTIHAD must be continued because the settlement of the contemporary affairs ... or continuation of ijtihad is the duty of fiqa... only issue in the system is elections for Khalifa.... so sorry to say madam and other commentators that don't be blabber ... think 100000000 times to comment about the Knowledge of respected sir Taimor ur Rehman sb. Respected sir love u so much for ur incredible services ❤.really me and thousands like me can't afford u in universities... So plz honourable sir keep it up.🙏🏻
I stopped your video at 01:07 to say that you don't know Imam Abu Hanifa and then his Students have exclusively worked on economics. Just GO AND READ THE BOOK "KITAB UL KHIRAJ" "کتاب الخراج" so that you know how much detailed ehkamat are given on economics. Also, read the book "Ehkaam aS Sultaniya" so that it might increase your shallow knowledge that islam has explained too much about ruling and political system as well. Shame
my advice for all to also listen modern islamic scholars namely dr. Asar-ul-Islam and Allama Pervez Ahmad to hear true Islam, which has no link with one we are following at present. hundreds of videos of both the scholars are available on youtube
@@mansoorahmed8026 do you really think ki tumhe marne k baad 72 hoore milengi... This idea is shit bro... Marne k baad na to hure milengi na hi sahad ki nadiya
you said that there was no possibility of democracy so how roman republic existed for hundreds of years before that they could have a senate like the;m with each senator from a city state
The Roman republic was not a democracy in the modern sense of the term. All political rights in Rome were based on property and the status of the family.
With due respect, can you please provide reference of authentic hadeeth condemning monarchy system as I don't agree with ur point.... In Quran We can refer to The story of Taloot when he was made king by command of Allah.... Secondly Najashi was a king who accepted Islam however Prophet did not condemn his rule...
Iqbal wanted Khalafat . Ijtihad is a different thing.It doesn't mean to change the basic teachings of Islam. And by the way please study the difference bw Khalafat and Mulookiat . Saltanat e Usmania was not a Khalafat.
Sir you’re wrong here that the real Islamic empire was born after the martyrdom of Hazrat Ali karamAllahu wajhu, in fact after Hz Ali, hazrat Imam Hasan r.a continued khilaf Ah for 6 months and then the first emperor was Hazrat Muavia r.a of the Umayyad dynasty. And according to authentic scholars Hazrat Muavia r.a was not a caliph.
If you are a muslim then you should know that laws of deen e islam has already been completed upon Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w. so Khalifat is the law given by Islam . Democracy can't be a Ijtihad . You quote Aristotle because he is not older than Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w. Teachings of Islam require to be changed but Aristotle quotes are still applicable.
With due respect Sir you tried your best to explain but some objections i have again with respect please clear your concepts. Islam is the complete encyclopedia teaches us how to survive, how to earn power to dominate this world and how to remain on right path in order to get success in life after day of judgement. Yes change is the need of time but no change should be against the Islamic system which is already very well explained.
"how to earn power to dominate the world"? like isis? explain... And Islam is not a political system at it's core, it's a personal connection between man and Allah and yes it teaches us about akhirah and to get success in the afterlife, but this has nothing to do with politics. It does give us guidance and values and some prescriptions in politics but thats about it. The Shariah is an abstract notion related to state. The traditional muslim states/Khilafat, after the 4 caliphs, aren't something which was from The Quran or Sunnah, They were the result of a system which was suitable for that time. In this age, it's outdated. I'm not advocating for political secularism, but what I'm saying is that to forget about the traditional state systems.
@@immasavagebro2845 By following the teachings of Allah and Prophet PBUH it is an very easy job to earn power. Power is not main thing i am talking about it was figure of speech on wider side it is fact that if you are on right side you will get power you have your own school of thoughts which i respect and thanks for sharing your thoughts. Caliphate is also the symbol of power for Muslims in those times and today too. ISIS is an terrorist bunch made by USA in order to defame Islamic rule of law I oppose that ISIS before and will continue doing this till i die. Any ways thanks stay bless and happy.
Your information is not correct. It was a republic till 27 BC (meaning senate based on the slave owning class voted). And after that it came under the rule of an Emperor.
You are talking technical and scientific advances which no doubt Islam is totally okay with and also muslims have no problem with it. We need a strict manifestation of Islam in socio political and economic policies. The entire message of this video made no sense.
This is your understanding. Strict manifestation of Islam means an effort to push Islam towards deep crisis. Any proposition that doesn't allow to produce questions can't be scientific. We should understand, jobs of a government is not to provide Jannat or duzakh to the people. But to resolve material issues people faces each & everyday.
@@quamrulhassan8205 show me one ayaah or hadith which is anti prosperity. Infact Islam provides solutions for economy by making it more humane and individual specific.
@@quamrulhassan8205 i said show me one ayaah or hadith which is anti prosperity or progress? Back up your arguments with facts rather than your opinions.
Imam Malik gave fatwa on forceful bayah of Caliph for which he was beaten. Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal was beaten and then he was martyred and 8 Lac people participate in his Janaza among them were 60,000 women. So the scholars did stand against the Kings and dictators when they didn't follow the rulings of Sharia. And what you sure that a Man made law is better than the God's Law. Do you people think that you are more wise than Allah who is your creator. For example, I am a Computer Scientist. If I make a Graphics Cards (GPU) I know how it should work, in which environment it will work properly, at which room temperature it will be safer because I created it. So, Allah who has created this whole universe and us, He knows what is good for his creation and what is wrong because He is Wise. This is why in Quran Allah always gives the logic that he is most wise. And secondly, tell me which was the first democratic state in the world some people say it was Greece and some say it Roman Republic and by the way computers never existed bacj then. And some say that New Zealand which was first to extend voting rights to women near the end of 19th century, should be considered the first- and true- ever democratic. And computers never existed back then. Why you democratic people give such silly arguments like technology, computers, electricity, etc. Look I'm Computer Engineer according to me these things are irrelevant to politics. These things has nothing to do with basic human rights. Basic human rights are employment, education, health, security, etc.
How khalifs were elected(yes elected) you missed it purposely... One man one vote was impossible but they used tribes head vote as representative vote of whole tribe. Umyads were first one to deny and later on stop this selection process. By accusing current elected khalif of the time ,Ali A.S... It was democratic smooth process for 30 years after holy Prophet Peace be upon him.
Do you know even after Prophet pbuh death, the controversy of selection of khalifa began. Every khalifah is selected in different manner. There was no " smooth" process of electing khalifa. That is why it crumbled in just 30 years.
تیمور صاحب مدینہ میں نبی پاک کی کوی سیاسی حکومت نہی تھی یہ صرف تبلیغ اور ہدایت کا دور تھا نبی پاک کے بعد اسلامی اصولوں کے کے مطابق سیاسی حکومت قایم ھوی
تیمور صا حب! آپ کے ہاں اسلامی انڈرسٹینڈنگ کا فقدان ھے قاضی ماوردی کی احکام السلطانیہ کا مطالعہ کریں ۔۔شیخ تقی الدین نبہانی کو پڑھیں ۔۔یہ دو لکھاری اس لیے لکھ رہا ہوں تاکہ آسانی رھے۔
For their protection. Because, jiziyah gives tax to the government. And more no Muslim means more tax. This allows a ruler of lslamic state not forefully convert their non Muslim population because otherwise they will not get Tax. Secondly this encourages the ruler to attract more non Muslims to his kingdom because if more non Muslim will come the more tax they will get
کاغذ، پرنٹنگ پریس اور سوشل میڈیا و پرنٹ میڈیا وغیرہ نے سیاست میں یہی تبدیلیاں کی ہے کہ جو بات مدینہ سے کوفہ تک پہلے ایک ہفتہ میں پہنچ جاتی تھی. آج وہ چند سیکنڈز میں پہنچ جائے گی. جو احکام نافذ کرنے میں پہلے ایک ہفتہ سے مہینے لگ جاتے تھے، آج وہ چند ہی پلوں میں نافذ ہوجائے گے. اس سے اسلامی نظام یعنی خلافت منسوخ نہیں ہوجاتا
U r not expaaining it properly ......everytime was modern in itself and those after us will b more advance then us ....... hazart umer had divided his biggest state into provinces ...... ye nizaam.phle unhon n takhleeq kia .....
argument is democracy was not an option then as there was no printing press, but concept of democracy was there as ppl then knew roman republic. islam did not accept the democratic form of gov.
جناب۔ استاد صاحب۔۔ بادشاہت کے خلاف احادیث کا ادھورا حوالہ درست فرما لیں آپ نے مکمل بات کیوں نہیں کی ۔ میں نہیں جانتا البتہ درست یا کم از کم مکمل بات ضرور کرنی چاہیے کیونکہ اس کے چکر میں بادشاہ بمعنی ملوکیت اور بعد ازاں علما نے سیاسی نظام کی اصلاحات کی ضرورت کیوں نہ محسوس کی اس پر بات ضرور کرنی چاہیے تھی۔ معروضی حالات ایسے نہیں بدلے تھے جیسا استعمار نے بدلے ۔۔۔ سر سید استعمار کے خالص غلام کہلاتے ہیں، انکا حوالہ مثبت انداز میں پیش کرنے سے رائے نیوٹرل نہیں رہتی۔ دین ، شریعت کا منہج کیا تھا 1200 سال تک ۔ دوسری تہذیبوں کا کیا منہج تھا ؟؟ ۔براہ کرم یہ فرق ضرور بتائیے گا
You are similarizing Allama Iqbal to sir syed. Have you ever read Iqbal's Islamic revolutionary poetry. Iqbal ko smjhny k lye Islam ka pura knowledge ona zrori e, tujh jesy Western influenced liberal keray ko kha fursat Islam prhny ki
He is a liberal man. We should not be learning Islamic political system from a liberal perspective. His view point is biased. It’s shameful to know such are the people who are educating the Muslim youth of Pakistan.
With sorry, you have knowledge of Communism, Marxism etc but you don't understand islami in depth. How hazrat umer was choosen? How hazrat usmam and hazrat ali R.A were chosen? Yes there is method to select the head of state. And in this case islam take vots of quality not quantity. A team of most genery, intelligent, pious and devoted peraons like hazrat abdur rehman bin auf R.a etc, which selected the new khalifa. Islam don't consider majority vots as i said before, it takes in count the minority with quality who represents the majority. Serach again and then talk on it. You know better than hazrat Muhammad P.B.U.H and caliphs? Islam is complete code of life including all aspects, politics, economics etc, even west is taking many laws who were made by caliphs like umer law for childs etc. In this case i am force to say,.you are just supporting and spreading the agenda of so called librals. Know and understand islam first.
Dear professor, you haven't studied the Islam as a complete political system and their sub-branch in it not even 0.001 percent of its whole system you need to study more about it, Additionally, you aren't aware of the glory of Muslim civilization yet in the field of science and remarkable work is done by our scientists in that era. And for your kind information Islam has never closed their door for ijtihad you must be miss understood, Islam has never contradicted with modern science and development I think you should study the Islamic system objectively you would find it more modern than other
Sir, I regret to say that you are misleading the public that in the era of Kholafa-e-Rashideen or even before that the existence of State/democracy was impossible because, in your opinion, there was no enough technology in that times. Yet, I think that the democratic system in that era was a mature one and that of today is immature because in that era the right of vote/opinion was availed only to knowledgeable persons and in today's era the vote of a scholar and an addict of heroin is equal. Thanks
The problem is that you are making the four schools of thoughts the source of Shariah. Yes we do need to revive Ijtihad but before that we need to understand that Shariah is primarily Quran and Sunnah, in Islamic terms we call it "نص". Basically meaning unchangeable rule. Ijtihad, Qayas, Istihsan and Taweel are the Fourth sources of law/policy making. But what we find in Quran and Sunnah can never be overruled. Even if the entire ummah sat together and through "ijtihad" arrives at the position that alcohol is allowed, Islam will never allow it. Modernists think that Ijitihad is some kind of cutting your own throat situation, where through ijtihad Muslims will arrive at the position that Religion shouldn't be a part of the politics, it once was in our Prophet's time and now its not needed so lets move on to secularism. This conclusion is the product of absolute ignorance of Islamic tradition and lack of basic Islamic knowledge itself. And btw the Imam's didnt support mulookiat e.g Imam Abu Hanifa was part of the famous revolution against the Ummayads and he also died in the jail of Al- Mansoor for not accepting a position in his regime.
Sir its your interpretation.Sir islam is more than religion it is Deen (way of life) system , with due respect plz go through scientific invention in Islamic golden age and try to see more than 400 years of history.... You will find political solutions also. If I summarise "economy without ethics" means "everything allowed to earn money ". We are not able to solve our issues it's not because of Islam, it is our own incompetency as a nation "hum sharab ki bottle pr shehd ka label lga kr bechny ki koshish kr rhy hn Jo k nhi biky ga". This is Islamic Republic of Pakistan, where government doesn't want to go for Elections..... Democracy 🤫
Fiqah Hanfi has given us principles in the light of Quran and Sunnah to solve our modern issues. Scientific inventions and discoveries have given a better way of communication but the concerns of humanity remain the same. For example a man gets hungry the same way but with science u can fill the hunger by feeding him pizza and Fiqah of Imam Abu Hanifa will guide you to feed him halal pizza. In short Human needs remain the same therefore the principles to solve them are also the same. Therefore science can help you implement them in the best way possible. Every thing has its own significance and nothing can be ignored. Human opinions, science and Fiqah they are all important
Nice analogy but you clearly missed the actual point. This issue runs deeper than "hunger" which is a fundamental issue that always persists. But what does Hanifa say about the legality of recent scientific advancements such as surrogation for example?
Great sir but I object your arguments about Islamic jurisdiction . I want to talk you about that if I get any opertunity ever. There is Something wrong with you , sorry to say that I respect you more than anyone , believe me but I think that's your by your perspective , and further it depends on your source of knowledge . That's a big yes it's a huge problem sir , even big personalities made mistakes in understanding Islam because they were looking at that from a wrong side . The Islam you talking about is the islam of University . Again I have a big But Here's another Islam , and you sorry to say know nothing about that , even I think you can't get that from books . I can't define it shortly And sory
تیمور بھائی آپ سے شکوہ ہے آپکی ویڈیو بہت کم چھوٹی ہیں آپکی باتیں علمی ہوتی ہیں لہذا آپ تھوڑا سا ٹائم نکال لیا کریں اللہ آپکو اسکا آجر دے گا دوسرا یہ کہ ویڈیو کوئی بھی بنائیں فیس بک پر ضرور اپ لوڈ کیا کریں شکریہ
Kyu nahi chal sakta Kyq intrest nahi par ban nahi hona chahiyah Kaya Hording nahi band honi cHAHIYAH Kya choor ko saza nahi milni cHAHIYAH Kaya aorto kj property mei right nahi milna cHAHIYAH Kaya ma bap ki izzat nahi karni cahaiyah Kaya haram kama nae sae nahi bachna cHAHIYAH Aur ap mugae yah bate Pakistan mei too Shariat ha hi nahi Yaha too Anglo Saxon law hai . Constitution of lndia 1930 sae inspired
ڈاکٹر تمہاری عقل کو کیا ھو گیا ھے نبی کریم کا دور سیاسی نہی تھا بلکل بھی یہ اسلام کا تبلیغی اور تعارفی دور تھا نبی دنیا میں سیاست کرنے نہی اے تھے البتہ اللہ کے نبی کے بعد اس سیاسی دور شروع ہوا اور اس کی ضرورت بھی تھی اک اسلامی مسلم قوم کو چلانے کی یقینا ضرورت تھی
Us dor mn politics thi tabhi qabeelo k sardar bhi the or Hazrat Muhammad SAW sb ki help krte the ap bhool gae ho kiya k Quran Pak mn Khilafat ka hukm h to kia yh politics nj h ? Us cheez ko counter kren jis k bare mn knowledge ho bilawaja tanqeed na kia kre
@Imran Ahmad Tru, gramerr is totalee overretatded butt when challenging intellectually one better consider brevity correct grammar and properly structured sentences, if wanted to be taken seriously. Nahi te mauj malangaa di, aan dawo fer jo moo ich aaye. :D
Sir AP hamesha bohot se batay ghalat karta ho . AP sa request ha AP phala AP hamare muslmano ke tarek pharlo palz hamara bacho ko ghum raha karna chor do hamay since nai Islam Chaya
I'm addicted to your lectures. Can't thank you enough for the efforts.
Q111
You explain things honestly without contamination of prejudice.
Amazing man, how beautifully you explain the difficult things with easiness..
Bhut informative
Islam gives us a free hand to adopt a political system compatible with our society meeting the requisite principles advocated by Islam as justice, tolerance, freedom and govern by consultation etc.
Great video
Please provide english subtitles.
بہترین تجزیہ۔ زبردست۔
حیرت انگیز لیکچر بہت پسند آیا سر
Sir bahut sey cheezun me apke mahlomaaat naqis hai.
Sir sahaba se to hmm sekh sakte ha na
Dear prof.. Four Imams of jurisprudence were living under duress and oppression of the ummayad and Abbasid ,,Maliks,,They faced unimaginable atrocities and persecution from the rulers .even for voicing minimal amount of dissent and refusing to become chief justice.. How they could have written about the political and economic system which would have been deemed by those vindictive and bloodthirsty monarchs as detrimental to their political and economic hegemony
So
only thank you very much
Fan your work ❤
Der khaaa saibb
Thanks Sir! You lecture is superb. You explain with ease without antagonizing other side.
Sir please explain fake Mullaisam.
رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ والہ وسلم کے دور میں ہی 9 ہجری میں ہی پورا سعودی عرب، یمن، اومان اور متحدہ عرب امارات اسلامی ریاست کا حصہ بن چکے تھے. مطلب کہ اس وقت بھی شہری ریاست سے زیادہ بڑھ چکی تھی. حضور اکرم صلی اللہ علیہ والہ وسلم نے مجلس شوریٰ کا ادارا قائم کر چکے تھے. اس شوری نے پہلے خلیفہ ابوبکر صدیق رضی اللہ عنہ کو خلیفہ مقرر کیا تھا. اس کے بعد ابوبکر کے حکم سے حضرت عمر رضی اللہ عنہ کو انہی کی حیاتی میں شوری نے اپنا دوسرا خلیفہ بنا لیا تھا. یہی طریقہ آگے تک چلتا رہا.
In small Country like Austria , We have 9 Provences and 49 sectors , as I know in 1975 it has Population of 7,3 Million , now it has about 9 Million only , Pakistan need at least 40 Provinces anf 400 Counties,
Thanks👍
1) In todays world still it is possible to destroy well equipped,well trained and well developed (taraqqi yaafta) army of 45 countries without having technology and equipment in Afghanistan
2)I totally agree with you that muslim monarchy started after the Era of Hazrat Ali and Imam Hassan, but you are mixing the Islamic monarchy+ more than 5 fiqs and Mullayiat with socio-politico system of Islam
3) if we have to look the socio-politico system of Islam we have to look back from 5 + fiqs till to Muhammad (S.A.W) era
4)for example islamic law says that "interest" (sood) is battle with Allah and prophet, cut the hand of thief, capital punishment and many others... this is what muslims are asking for
5) I totally agree with you that IJTEHAAD is till the day judgement
6)As far as Allam iqbal`s philosophy is concerned, i hope you would have an understanding about how much he has written against western democracy, imperialism, capitalism and SOOD
7) Pillars of western democracy are today`s banking system making rich people more richer and poor people more poorer , Capitalism and Political "FIRQA WAARIYAT".
1. Afghanistan didnt defeat the 45 countries, nor those 45 countries entirely made their army invade afghanistan, afghanistan was under control of the US for 20 years and kept taliban at shoe, because of domestic problems and taliban recruits from different countries + they had more problems to deal with, they left afghanistan
2. there is no socio-political system in Islam, you may have heard the hadith that one man went to Muhammad PBUH for judgement, then went to Umar, this proves it
3. It was the right of the individual if he wanted to take which judging method, the jew one, christian one, islamic one etc in the time of Muhammad (PBUH), it was not imposed like state law, state law was brought by colonial powers and now is the system only. Now you may ask, "but a person can leave his faith just to avoid the punishment", this further proves that religion is a matter of Man and God, nobady else can intervene
Even choosing the Caliph became quite an issue when one study Islamic history. It hadn't been that simple. Splitting of Islam into two main and foremost sects ie Shiaism and Sunnism is an evident example of what I am saying.
(Food for thought from history itself)
Till Khalifat-e-Rashidoun there was no problem between two major sect until a dynasty was about to appear (Ummayah)
Thanks com... It's really very helpful for me because when we want to be progressive this type issues create many problems and confusions
Sir umar RA ni b shariah nafis kia ta??
Excellent work however would have been better if discussed in concrete terms about taxes tax collection and about islamic laws in times of prophet and so on and on ---- concrete info is lacking however prof sahib has the talent and knowledge to put more light on judicial system plus laws plus taxes and tax collection
True but in these matters policies varied regionally and temporally.
Thanks for presenting these valuable lecturers.
in true islam" namaz means system ensuring equality in providing security and safety of honour, wealth and life of all is equal; roza means, every man and woman are bound to have war training to fight in the days of wars. zakat means share happiness and sorrows with each other; hajj means stage a jihad against who attack a muslim state. a muslim is who believe on equality with aiman on Hazrat Muhammad PBUH as messenger of God and God is alone.
Thora parh lejeya ga comment.
Mohtram Nehayat moazrat aap naqis malomat ko baghair kisi reference k phailay ja rahy hain aik example 300 saal printing press pr pabandi rahi khudara kuch to kheyal karain agr aap ya bat kr rahy hain k printing press pr pabandi rahi ya q nai btaty k q rahi ar kiss cheez ki printing pr pabandi rahi so samaeen sun lain almukhtasir us daur m esai pop ny apny aik follower k zariya naooz billah quran m tahareef karwain ar unko print krwana shoro kr deya ar jb ya tehreef shuda nuskha usamniyo k pass pohncha to unho ny es tarah k tamam nuskhy ikathy keya ar wo tamam printing press Jo quran k en nuskho ki printing kr rahy thy un par pabandi sirf es hd tk lagai k wo quran qareem print nahi karain gy baqi sub print hota rha ar quran ki printing k leya k leya jamia process bnaya gya taky tahareef shuda nuskho ki mazeed printing na ho saky ar jin logo k literature parh k aap reviews dy rahy hain kash k aap ya bhi parh ar samjh lety k un logo Nabi pak (S.A.W.W) k bary m Kya kheyalat thy jis literature ki summary aap bary methy alfaaz m beyan kr rahy hain ar gumraah kr rahy hain khudara ya zulm na karain. Bàat bohat lambi ho jay g parhny waly k leya lekin mjhy aapky nazriya ki kuch samjh zaror a gai .....
Just-woww amazing lecture just keep doing sir
Thankyou so much Sir, the world needs more people this generous and enlightened, may Allah bless you.
Thanks
Dr sab we need Che guevra
as a muslim I take no responsibility for the mess that was created after Ali,s khilafa, u can criticize as much as u want
Both the mentioned dynasties were Monarchies, not Khilafat.
They rulers were Muslims but their conduct were similar to Roman Emperors.
Sir, Allah ho akbr, matlb ap jo Kuch bol rahy Hain ospr daleel bahoot zarori hai , imamon NY politics ko bahoot achy se bataya hai even Nabi Kareem saw my politics pr bahoot taweel tariky se samjhaya hai I think wo kitaben ap tak pahnchi Nahi mujhe address inbox kijiye will send you
Salam professor can you please give me your opinion about Ayatullah Sheikh Muhammad Kazim Khurasani He is known for using his position as a Marja as legitimizing force behind the first democratic revolution of Asia that happened in Iran (1905-1911), where he was the main clerical supporter of the revolution. He believed that the democratic form of government is what Islam says as well and it will be the the best choice in the absence of Imam and regarded the democratic constitutional revolution a Jihad (holy war) in which all Muslims had to participate.
Along with Mirza Husayn Tehrani and Shaikh Abdallah Mazandarani, he led people against what they called a "state tyranny", issued fatwas, and "sent telegrams to tribal chiefs, prominent national and political leaders, and heads of state in England, France, Germany, and Turkey".
When Mohammad Ali Shah became king of Iran, Mohammad Kazim Khorasani sent him a 'ten-point' instruction including points on protecting Islam, promoting domestic industries and modern science, stopping colonial intervention in Iran 'while retaining diplomatic relations', and establishing 'justice and equality'
Amazing .... U have amazing skill of telling conservatives that , man it's time to move on ... Hope more and more people listen to u rather than looking for answers to modern day problems in Religious books ...
Sir please reply to Orya maqbool jaan
Assalamualaikum main iindia se hun aap allama shibli nomani ki alfarooq kitaab ek bar padho usme aap ko maloom hoga ke Hazrat Umar ne kaise khilafat chalai
Sir, i want to you to make this islamic shariah series videos in English language because it's so informative. Most of the people including me are facing difficulties in finding exact words of english to explain this concept
Ma sha Allah you are trying your best to convey the knowledge you have.
But i would like to correct one thing k aap islamic political system ko sirf haakim choose krnay k process tk mehdood kr rh hen jb k ye nizam basically is nuktay pr based hai k islami nizam me legislator sirf Allah ki zaat hai, jis me ehkam e ilahi nafiz hon, ksi insan ki ijazat ki zaroorat nai ho un k nafaaz k liye.
Aur isi trha jamhooriyat wo nizam hai jis me a group of people is the legislator aur is group ki ijazat k bger ehkam e ilahi b nafiz nai ho sktay.
These systems are not merely the processes to choose the haakim.
Ap pehlay poora context deeply study kren phr apna view samnay rkhen q k already log is difference ko nai smjhtay aur wo mazeed ghalat.fehmi ka shikaar ho jatay hen
Well in Islam there is no one way to choose the Khalifa. I think that can easily be proven by history.
Islam gives the best way to choose the khalifa I think I can prove it mohtram professor...
Hareem madam ... in laws ko execute krny wali authority b honi chyia or wo khalifa ha ... legislative procedure goes to Allah Almighty pr ab wahi ni a skti,hm kese west ko compete kr skty hn ...so respected sir already proclaimed that IJTIHAD must be continued because the settlement of the contemporary affairs ... or continuation of ijtihad is the duty of fiqa... only issue in the system is elections for Khalifa.... so sorry to say madam and other commentators that don't be blabber ... think 100000000 times to comment about the Knowledge of respected sir Taimor ur Rehman sb. Respected sir love u so much for ur incredible services ❤.really me and thousands like me can't afford u in universities... So plz honourable sir keep it up.🙏🏻
@@munawarali3870 u r very right sir....these people even did not hear what professor sab talking about.
@@mnaprofdrnaveedraheem4318 sir, let me know I am very keen to know this,
I stopped your video at 01:07 to say that you don't know Imam Abu Hanifa and then his Students have exclusively worked on economics. Just GO AND READ THE BOOK "KITAB UL KHIRAJ" "کتاب الخراج" so that you know how much detailed ehkamat are given on economics.
Also, read the book "Ehkaam aS Sultaniya" so that it might increase your shallow knowledge that islam has explained too much about ruling and political system as well.
Shame
Well done
sir plz do short series of pol science lectures as per css syllabus, if not all plz do some videos on main topics till January plzzzzzzzzzzz
my advice for all to also listen modern islamic scholars namely dr. Asar-ul-Islam and Allama Pervez Ahmad to hear true Islam, which has no link with one we are following at present. hundreds of videos of both the scholars are available on youtube
Great!
Why did the Imams not challenge the current political system given all the knowledge of the Quran and Hadees?
Because lmams have no power all power resides with the deep state
Sir marxism rejects religion so do u reject religioun too??
No we can't reject the religion
@@mansoorahmed8026 then you aren’t following true communism.
Million curse on Markxism you also go to hell with it 😡😡
@@lisaanuddin Oh Pagal Butt you go to hell with communism. Why we follow this. Even yor Abba was also not follower of communism. Butt Pagal Ho gia
@@mansoorahmed8026 do you really think ki tumhe marne k baad 72 hoore milengi... This idea is shit bro... Marne k baad na to hure milengi na hi sahad ki nadiya
you said that there was no possibility of democracy so how roman republic existed for hundreds of years before that they could have a senate like the;m
with each senator from a city state
The Roman republic was not a democracy in the modern sense of the term. All political rights in Rome were based on property and the status of the family.
With due respect, can you please provide reference of authentic hadeeth condemning monarchy system as I don't agree with ur point.... In Quran We can refer to The story of Taloot when he was made king by command of Allah.... Secondly Najashi was a king who accepted Islam however Prophet did not condemn his rule...
but its very informative sir kafi chezze gult keh rahen hen
Jese?
Maslan?
There is difference between history of Islam and history of Muslims
ڑاکٹر صاحب اہپ
Iqbal wanted Khalafat .
Ijtihad is a different thing.It doesn't mean to change the basic teachings of Islam.
And by the way please study the difference bw Khalafat and Mulookiat .
Saltanat e Usmania was not a Khalafat.
Sir you’re wrong here that the real Islamic empire was born after the martyrdom of Hazrat Ali karamAllahu wajhu, in fact after Hz Ali, hazrat Imam Hasan r.a continued khilaf Ah for 6 months and then the first emperor was Hazrat Muavia r.a of the Umayyad dynasty.
And according to authentic scholars Hazrat Muavia r.a was not a caliph.
If you are a muslim then you should know that laws of deen e islam has already been completed upon Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w. so Khalifat is the law given by Islam .
Democracy can't be a Ijtihad .
You quote Aristotle because he is not older than Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w.
Teachings of Islam require to be changed but Aristotle quotes are still applicable.
With due respect Sir you tried your best to explain but some objections i have again with respect please clear your concepts. Islam is the complete encyclopedia teaches us how to survive, how to earn power to dominate this world and how to remain on right path in order to get success in life after day of judgement. Yes change is the need of time but no change should be against the Islamic system which is already very well explained.
"how to earn power to dominate the world"? like isis? explain...
And Islam is not a political system at it's core, it's a personal connection between man and Allah and yes it teaches us about akhirah and to get success in the afterlife, but this has nothing to do with politics. It does give us guidance and values and some prescriptions in politics but thats about it. The Shariah is an abstract notion related to state. The traditional muslim states/Khilafat, after the 4 caliphs, aren't something which was from The Quran or Sunnah, They were the result of a system which was suitable for that time. In this age, it's outdated. I'm not advocating for political secularism, but what I'm saying is that to forget about the traditional state systems.
@@immasavagebro2845 By following the teachings of Allah and Prophet PBUH it is an very easy job to earn power. Power is not main thing i am talking about it was figure of speech on wider side it is fact that if you are on right side you will get power you have your own school of thoughts which i respect and thanks for sharing your thoughts. Caliphate is also the symbol of power for Muslims in those times and today too. ISIS is an terrorist bunch made by USA in order to defame Islamic rule of law I oppose that ISIS before and will continue doing this till i die. Any ways thanks stay bless and happy.
@@immasavagebro2845
Does lslamic concept of social justice is outdated?
Allah ho akbr , dear professor , apny hisse m ye sab may laiye .....
@@whiteholeeducationcenter yes obviusly
👌
Roman Republic was a democratic state despite the fact that it spanned pver whole Italian peninsula, North African Coast and Iberian peninsula.
Your information is not correct. It was a republic till 27 BC (meaning senate based on the slave owning class voted). And after that it came under the rule of an Emperor.
You are talking technical and scientific advances which no doubt Islam is totally okay with and also muslims have no problem with it.
We need a strict manifestation of Islam in socio political and economic policies.
The entire message of this video made no sense.
This is your understanding. Strict manifestation of Islam means an effort to push Islam towards deep crisis. Any proposition that doesn't allow to produce questions can't be scientific. We should understand, jobs of a government is not to provide Jannat or duzakh to the people. But to resolve material issues people faces each & everyday.
@@quamrulhassan8205 show me one ayaah or hadith which is anti prosperity. Infact Islam provides solutions for economy by making it more humane and individual specific.
@@qtubedits Prosperity of whom? Muslims or mankind?
Again, r u serious? I think either u didn't read Quran or failed to understand meanings. Thank u.
@@quamrulhassan8205 i said show me one ayaah or hadith which is anti prosperity or progress?
Back up your arguments with facts rather than your opinions.
Thanks sir for presenting such a valueable lecture based on facts .
Imam Malik gave fatwa on forceful bayah of Caliph for which he was beaten. Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal was beaten and then he was martyred and 8 Lac people participate in his Janaza among them were 60,000 women. So the scholars did stand against the Kings and dictators when they didn't follow the rulings of Sharia. And what you sure that a Man made law is better than the God's Law. Do you people think that you are more wise than Allah who is your creator. For example, I am a Computer Scientist. If I make a Graphics Cards (GPU) I know how it should work, in which environment it will work properly, at which room temperature it will be safer because I created it. So, Allah who has created this whole universe and us, He knows what is good for his creation and what is wrong because He is Wise. This is why in Quran Allah always gives the logic that he is most wise. And secondly, tell me which was the first democratic state in the world some people say it was Greece and some say it Roman Republic and by the way computers never existed bacj then. And some say that New Zealand which was first to extend voting rights to women near the end of 19th century, should be considered the first- and true- ever democratic. And computers never existed back then. Why you democratic people give such silly arguments like technology, computers, electricity, etc. Look I'm Computer Engineer according to me these things are irrelevant to politics. These things has nothing to do with basic human rights. Basic human rights are employment, education, health, security, etc.
👍🏼
How khalifs were elected(yes elected) you missed it purposely...
One man one vote was impossible but they used tribes head vote as representative vote of whole tribe.
Umyads were first one to deny and later on stop this selection process. By accusing current elected khalif of the time ,Ali A.S...
It was democratic smooth process for 30 years after holy Prophet Peace be upon him.
Do you know even after Prophet pbuh death, the controversy of selection of khalifa began. Every khalifah is selected in different manner. There was no " smooth" process of electing khalifa. That is why it crumbled in just 30 years.
سر نظام امامت پر کیا کہیں گے؟
نظامت امامت اور خلافت ایک ہی شے ہے
تیمور صاحب مدینہ میں نبی پاک کی کوی سیاسی حکومت نہی تھی یہ صرف تبلیغ اور ہدایت کا دور تھا نبی پاک کے بعد اسلامی اصولوں کے کے مطابق سیاسی حکومت قایم ھوی
Siasat hai kya?
تیمور صا حب!
آپ کے ہاں اسلامی انڈرسٹینڈنگ کا فقدان ھے
قاضی ماوردی کی احکام السلطانیہ کا مطالعہ کریں ۔۔شیخ تقی الدین نبہانی کو پڑھیں ۔۔یہ دو لکھاری اس لیے لکھ رہا ہوں تاکہ آسانی رھے۔
Sir sorry to say
Democracy is 3000 Year old concept
Why in Shariya jiziya tax for Nonmuslim
For their protection.
Because, jiziyah gives tax to the government.
And more no Muslim means more tax.
This allows a ruler of lslamic state not forefully convert their non Muslim population because otherwise they will not get Tax.
Secondly this encourages the ruler to attract more non Muslims to his kingdom because if more non Muslim will come the more tax they will get
@@whiteholeeducationcenter see thisth-cam.com/video/KweCFhAmSSs/w-d-xo.html
@@whiteholeeducationcenter in a government, it is not seen that a person is muslim or not, every person has to give tax
چاروں ائمہ بنو امیہ اور بنو عباس کی ملوکیت کے زمانے میں ہوئے تو اس وقت سیاست پر لکھنا اپنا سر تلوار کے حوالے کرنے کے مترادف تھا۔
کاغذ، پرنٹنگ پریس اور سوشل میڈیا و پرنٹ میڈیا وغیرہ نے سیاست میں یہی تبدیلیاں کی ہے کہ جو بات مدینہ سے کوفہ تک پہلے ایک ہفتہ میں پہنچ جاتی تھی. آج وہ چند سیکنڈز میں پہنچ جائے گی. جو احکام نافذ کرنے میں پہلے ایک ہفتہ سے مہینے لگ جاتے تھے، آج وہ چند ہی پلوں میں نافذ ہوجائے گے. اس سے اسلامی نظام یعنی خلافت منسوخ نہیں ہوجاتا
It makes it possible to have mass representative systems. This was not possible before.
U r not expaaining it properly ......everytime was modern in itself and those after us will b more advance then us ....... hazart umer had divided his biggest state into provinces ...... ye nizaam.phle unhon n takhleeq kia .....
argument is democracy was not an option then as there was no printing press, but concept of democracy was there as ppl then knew roman republic. islam did not accept the democratic form of gov.
The Ancient Greek concept of democracy excluded women, slaves, and anyone without property. It was restricted to property owning men.
جناب۔ استاد صاحب۔۔ بادشاہت کے خلاف احادیث کا ادھورا حوالہ درست فرما لیں
آپ نے مکمل بات کیوں نہیں کی ۔ میں نہیں جانتا
البتہ درست یا کم از کم مکمل بات ضرور کرنی چاہیے
کیونکہ
اس کے چکر میں بادشاہ بمعنی ملوکیت اور بعد ازاں
علما نے سیاسی نظام کی اصلاحات کی ضرورت کیوں نہ محسوس کی
اس پر بات ضرور کرنی چاہیے تھی۔
معروضی حالات ایسے نہیں بدلے تھے جیسا استعمار نے بدلے ۔۔۔
سر سید استعمار کے خالص غلام کہلاتے ہیں، انکا حوالہ مثبت انداز میں پیش کرنے سے رائے نیوٹرل نہیں رہتی۔
دین ، شریعت کا منہج کیا تھا 1200 سال تک ۔
دوسری تہذیبوں کا کیا منہج تھا ؟؟ ۔براہ کرم یہ فرق ضرور بتائیے گا
You are similarizing Allama Iqbal to sir syed.
Have you ever read Iqbal's Islamic revolutionary poetry. Iqbal ko smjhny k lye Islam ka pura knowledge ona zrori e, tujh jesy Western influenced liberal keray ko kha fursat Islam prhny ki
معذرت کے ساتھ۔۔۔۔اسلامی تاریخ کے لحاظ سے آپ کا مطالعہ سرسری ہے۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔
آپ نے اسلام پڑھا ہے سمجھا نہیں
He is a liberal man. We should not be learning Islamic political system from a liberal perspective. His view point is biased. It’s shameful to know such are the people who are educating the Muslim youth of Pakistan.
He is a nice intellectual. These things should be discussed openly.
With sorry, you have knowledge of Communism, Marxism etc but you don't understand islami in depth.
How hazrat umer was choosen? How hazrat usmam and hazrat ali R.A were chosen? Yes there is method to select the head of state. And in this case islam take vots of quality not quantity. A team of most genery, intelligent, pious and devoted peraons like hazrat abdur rehman bin auf R.a etc, which selected the new khalifa. Islam don't consider majority vots as i said before, it takes in count the minority with quality who represents the majority.
Serach again and then talk on it.
You know better than hazrat Muhammad P.B.U.H and caliphs? Islam is complete code of life including all aspects, politics, economics etc, even west is taking many laws who were made by caliphs like umer law for childs etc.
In this case i am force to say,.you are just supporting and spreading the agenda of so called librals.
Know and understand islam first.
Why yoi skipped Hazdat Umer RA period?
Yeah he did this .....he is not explaining it that right ......
Dear professor, you haven't studied the Islam as a complete political system and their sub-branch in it not even 0.001 percent of its whole system you need to study more about it, Additionally, you aren't aware of the glory of Muslim civilization yet in the field of science and remarkable work is done by our scientists in that era. And for your kind information Islam has never closed their door for ijtihad you must be miss understood, Islam has never contradicted with modern science and development I think you should study the Islamic system objectively you would find it more modern than other
Sir, I regret to say that you are misleading the public that in the era of Kholafa-e-Rashideen or even before that the existence of State/democracy was impossible because, in your opinion, there was no enough technology in that times. Yet, I think that the democratic system in that era was a mature one and that of today is immature because in that era the right of vote/opinion was availed only to knowledgeable persons and in today's era the vote of a scholar and an addict of heroin is equal. Thanks
سماج پہ امام غزالی نے کافی کچھ لکھا ہے
The problem is that you are making the four schools of thoughts the source of Shariah. Yes we do need to revive Ijtihad but before that we need to understand that Shariah is primarily Quran and Sunnah, in Islamic terms we call it "نص". Basically meaning unchangeable rule. Ijtihad, Qayas, Istihsan and Taweel are the Fourth sources of law/policy making. But what we find in Quran and Sunnah can never be overruled. Even if the entire ummah sat together and through "ijtihad" arrives at the position that alcohol is allowed, Islam will never allow it. Modernists think that Ijitihad is some kind of cutting your own throat situation, where through ijtihad Muslims will arrive at the position that Religion shouldn't be a part of the politics, it once was in our Prophet's time and now its not needed so lets move on to secularism. This conclusion is the product of absolute ignorance of Islamic tradition and lack of basic Islamic knowledge itself. And btw the Imam's didnt support mulookiat e.g Imam Abu Hanifa was part of the famous revolution against the Ummayads and he also died in the jail of Al- Mansoor for not accepting a position in his regime.
Khilafat aur malooqiyat by maudidi ra parhai apko ilam hojaiga islami tarz e hukumat ka
With due respect sir, you didn't explain islamic system properly, you are also not sure
Islam is a religion. Not a “system”.
Sir its your interpretation.Sir islam is more than religion it is Deen (way of life) system , with due respect plz go through scientific invention in Islamic golden age and try to see more than 400 years of history.... You will find political solutions also. If I summarise "economy without ethics" means "everything allowed to earn money ". We are not able to solve our issues it's not because of Islam, it is our own incompetency as a nation "hum sharab ki bottle pr shehd ka label lga kr bechny ki koshish kr rhy hn Jo k nhi biky ga". This is Islamic Republic of Pakistan, where government doesn't want to go for Elections..... Democracy 🤫
@@mentalmoon5745 yes it is a way of life, not a way of government
ترک خلافت پر پرنٹنگ پریس والی بات ایک تہمت ہے۔ آپ اس کا کوئی ٹھوس ثبوت دیں۔
Printing press s murad aik instrument hua krta tha jo us dor mn likhne k kam ata tha us k bad printing press modern form mn aya tha
Aj s almost 350 saal phle aese instrument bna liye the jo print krte the pr bht time taken the or bht km print krte the
اپکے تمام ترقی کے باوجود اج انصاف اور سچ کہی نہی مل رہا ۔۔۔۔۔۔
Fiqah Hanfi has given us principles in the light of Quran and Sunnah to solve our modern issues.
Scientific inventions and discoveries have given a better way of communication but the concerns of humanity remain the same.
For example a man gets hungry the same way but with science u can fill the hunger by feeding him pizza and Fiqah of Imam Abu Hanifa will guide you to feed him halal pizza.
In short Human needs remain the same therefore the principles to solve them are also the same. Therefore science can help you implement them in the best way possible.
Every thing has its own significance and nothing can be ignored.
Human opinions, science and Fiqah they are all important
Nice analogy but you clearly missed the actual point. This issue runs deeper than "hunger" which is a fundamental issue that always persists. But what does Hanifa say about the legality of recent scientific advancements such as surrogation for example?
progressive person
All humans are progressive because those who are static are in graves
Great sir but I object your arguments about Islamic jurisdiction . I want to talk you about that if I get any opertunity ever.
There is Something wrong with you , sorry to say that I respect you more than anyone , believe me but I think that's your by your perspective , and further it depends on your source of knowledge . That's a big yes it's a huge problem sir , even big personalities made mistakes in understanding Islam because they were looking at that from a wrong side . The Islam you talking about is the islam of University . Again I have a big But
Here's another Islam , and you sorry to say know nothing about that , even I think you can't get that from books .
I can't define it shortly
And sory
تیمور بھائی آپ سے شکوہ ہے آپکی ویڈیو بہت کم چھوٹی ہیں آپکی باتیں علمی ہوتی ہیں لہذا آپ تھوڑا سا ٹائم نکال لیا کریں اللہ آپکو اسکا آجر دے گا دوسرا یہ کہ ویڈیو کوئی بھی بنائیں فیس بک پر ضرور اپ لوڈ کیا کریں شکریہ
Wasif Ali wafis kehta h ke ibadat deen ke lehaz se kro & zindgy science ke lehaz se advance karen ye Nukta bhi Betreen h
Science A-moral hai.
Science sae hum apnae lia asania too pada kar saktae hai
Par Zindagi nahi guzar saktae .
1400 saal purana qanoon ab nhi chal sakta humein revoulution chahiye
Kyu nahi chal sakta
Kyq intrest nahi par ban nahi hona chahiyah
Kaya Hording nahi band honi cHAHIYAH
Kya choor ko saza nahi milni cHAHIYAH
Kaya aorto kj property mei right nahi milna cHAHIYAH
Kaya ma bap ki izzat nahi karni cahaiyah
Kaya haram kama nae sae nahi bachna cHAHIYAH
Aur ap mugae yah bate Pakistan mei too Shariat ha hi nahi
Yaha too Anglo Saxon law hai .
Constitution of lndia 1930 sae inspired
@@whiteholeeducationcenter apne joh kaha woh hona chahiye, magar Islam ka jo makhsos governing daira ham ne banaya hai usse bahar
@@whiteholeeducationcenter plus, ab interest pe ban nahi hosakta, because of capitalism and world bank
Khulafa-e-rashideen is the correct word not khulafa-e-rashidoon..
@Humza Khan
It's rashideen in Arabic as well when using as noun.
@Humza Khan
علیکم بسنتی و سنۃ الخلفاء الراشدین المھدیین
Apki kagaz wali soch pe afsoos h
کاش اپ پڑھتے پھر اسلامک سسٹم پر بولتے
افسوس ۔۔۔۔یا کسی اہل علم سے پوچھتے ۔۔۔۔۔بلکل غلط بول رہے ھو ۔۔۔۔
Dear, make a video on ur views.
ڈاکٹر تمہاری عقل کو کیا ھو گیا ھے نبی کریم کا دور سیاسی نہی تھا بلکل بھی یہ اسلام کا تبلیغی اور تعارفی دور تھا نبی دنیا میں سیاست کرنے نہی اے تھے البتہ اللہ کے نبی کے بعد اس سیاسی دور شروع ہوا اور اس کی ضرورت بھی تھی اک اسلامی مسلم قوم کو چلانے کی یقینا ضرورت تھی
Us dor mn politics thi tabhi qabeelo k sardar bhi the or Hazrat Muhammad SAW sb ki help krte the ap bhool gae ho kiya k Quran Pak mn Khilafat ka hukm h to kia yh politics nj h ? Us cheez ko counter kren jis k bare mn knowledge ho bilawaja tanqeed na kia kre
Rawani se Ek story suna rhy hn.
Apni trf se bht si batyn shamil kr k.
Lack of vision about sharia law
Lack of knowledge on sharia law
Bhai tu pehlay Lectures ke spelling theek kr k aa.
@Imran Ahmad Tru, gramerr is totalee overretatded butt when challenging intellectually one better consider brevity correct grammar and properly structured sentences, if wanted to be taken seriously.
Nahi te mauj malangaa di, aan dawo fer jo moo ich aaye. :D
Full of stupid analysis, no any sense
Sir AP hamesha bohot se batay ghalat karta ho . AP sa request ha AP phala AP hamare muslmano ke tarek pharlo palz hamara bacho ko ghum raha karna chor do hamay since nai Islam Chaya
Kya baat ghalat hai meray dost. Nishan Dahi karo.
اپکے تمام ترقی کے باوجود اج انصاف اور سچ کہی نہی مل رہا ۔۔۔۔۔۔