So, according to Branham, the only voice of God is when his angel speaks through him. Jesus said “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.” Did Branham completely ignore the Holy Ghost in each believer? Is not the Holy Ghost/Spirit of truth the voice of God inside each son and daughter of God? Branham worked hard on fashioning himself like an Old Testament prophet. He became blind to the New Covenant promise of the Holy Spirit to each believer.
This all ties into today’s two video: I listen to Bob DeWaay and his Critical Issues Commentary podcast. His podcast are primarily preaching the Gospel. But, he will have segments where he talks more directly about his days in the Shepherding Movement and their deliverance ministries right out of Bible college. He also discusses William Branham, the Word of Faith (WF), the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), and other non-connected ministries that be using the same apostate doctrine, in relation to the Gospel. He's spoken about the enforced piety, the different standards between pastors and the those in the pew, and the leader of that particular ministry being the only one with the great salvation stories. One, being that members were always going to the pastor for deliverance sessions. They were never freed from torment. The reason I'm bringing this up is that between the Bible sermons from Mr. DeWaay and Mr. Collin's experience and research they both complement each other in giving the full picture. And this ties in with the next paragraph. If you’re not following the Gospel, but being taught to ignore Bible, to follow man’s word, examples such as strange sermons or deliverance practices, the end result can be morbid. And by morbid I mean the lack of an uproar after Bill Johnson, of Bethel Church in Redding California, fails to heal his wife’s cancer. He claims his wife was healed. And he’s doing the same thing that Wm. Branham did but in the internet age.
did you know that Bill Johnson wants William Branhams mantle. That half his church left int he 1990's when he seriously got into Branhams teachings and his church had to leave the AOG. Today in Bethels book The Physics of Heaven you can see where all of this leads - to the new age.
It's so awful that this website actually disputes the Word of God!!! The first thing I thought of is that they are pointing out that details in each resurrection story varies to justify the fact that the details (and a lot more than just details) vary in the stories WMB told. It's sickening that they promote their false prophet and to do so they denigrate the Bible.
That's exactly right what bro William branham said......what the apostles said is not enough for today.... The holy ghost was giving us today that which is perfect that the apostles were waiting for....or the perfect interpretation of the word.... The apostles preached that which is in part.....and that is not enough today....we need that which is perfect.... The holy ghost prophecy was in 2 parts not one part.....just like a Chinese token.... The holy ghost gave us the planting rain in the beginning with the apostles.....and the holy ghost gave us the harvest rain with the ministry of bro William branham.... William branham doesn't reject what petee said.....he pointed you to believe what peter said and that is to heed the light that shineth in a dark place.....and that is the light in the evening time....and peter said to be established in the present day truth.....not just the partial truth from 2000 years ago ....the truth is always present day....the light in the evening time at the endtime
Mr DC777, you stated : "William branham doesn't reject what petee said.....he pointed you to believe what peter said and that is to heed the light that shineth in a dark place.....and that is the light in the evening time....and peter said to be established in the present day truth.....not just the partial truth from 2000 years ago ....the truth is always present day....the light in the evening time at the endtime" But don't you take and promote Acts 2:38 as your " gospel of your salvation"??? And from the time of Peter to present "gear-shift" by God from "the gospel of the kingdom" to "dispensation of the grace of God" ended? as in terminated by? WB?
@@restoredtotruth Correction to your understanding of my response to DC777.... this is what you have reversed in your understanding: FROM "the gospel of the kingdom" TO "dispensation of the grace of God" ended? as in terminated by? WB? in other words....Did WB terminate or END Paul's grace age message he(Paul) received from Ascended Lord Jesus Christ? Are we to go back to "gospel of the kingdom" (Mt9:35 and ref's) to under Law program as ministry of J.C. and JTB, the 12 were ? In His earthly ministry J.C. OBSERVED and was under Moses' Law. (Mt 5:17 as were the 12 in Acts.
@@restoredtotruth your entry: "concerning termination, as far as The Bride is concerned, the Laodicean Church Age, has been terminated unto THEM,.. although it is still continuing on within the Church Ages,... it has come to an end to The Bride, when they crossed over to that of the Bride Age. Those that have not crossed over are fodder for the Tribulation. Which would make them fall into that of the class of the foolish virgin. They are virgin to The Word, but are intellectuals, not having the Holy Ghost" My response: Supposition, premise ( 7 ages for the Church) for your doctrine NOT supported by Scripture. Revelations concerns Israel and unbelieving Gentile Nations (Ps2) Church Body of Christ NOT partakers of the WRATH of God. Read 1/2 Thess Letters...refernced to "Day of the Lord" and O.T. ref'cs for THAT day. For the "dispensation of the grace of God" is referred to as GRACE AGE, does NOT END until God completes the body of Christ. When that comes ,then Rapture is "our gathering together unto Him"...."Times of the Gentiles be come in", has no time "signs" other then 2 Tim 3. "SIGNS" you use for your "rapture" are signs inside Tribulation, (mt 24) .....God advises us NOT to number ourselves as "elect" for this event!
@@restoredtotruth what is that foreign sounding phrase we see among these posts???? Ad-Hominem...classic display of your response here in response for my correction to your mis-understanding OF??...This post: " Correction to your understanding of my response to DC777.... this is what you have reversed in your understanding: FROM "the gospel of the kingdom" TO "dispensation of the grace of God" ended? as in terminated by? WB? in other words....Did WB terminate or END Paul's grace age message he(Paul) received from Ascended Lord Jesus Christ? Are we to go back to "gospel of the kingdom" (Mt9:35 and ref's) to under Law program as ministry of J.C. and JTB, the 12 were ? In His earthly ministry J.C. OBSERVED and was under Moses' Law. (Mt 5:17 as were the 12 in Acts." ad hominem def: ADJ "of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining:" ADV "in a way that is DIRECTED AGAINST a person RATHER than the POSITION they are MAINTAINING:" Seems this is your tactic in most of your responses/posts. Instead of enligtening us further of the basis of your doctrines you INstead resort to AD-HOMINEM attacks. The question posed is/was : ".Did WB terminate or END Paul's grace age message he(Paul) received from Ascended Lord Jesus Christ?
1:58 “the word that fell on the day of Pentecost will not work this day”????? 😮😮🤔 You’ve got to be kidding me! So everything that Peter said as the result of receiving the Holy Ghost that day, about baptism in the name of Jesus and promise of salvation to “all who are far off -for all whom the lord WILL call…” and the rest of Acts chapter 2 does not work today? And his followers call him the “word prophet”? If Paul Baptized according to the word that fell on that day which instructed Peter to issue a baptismal prescription for the gospel, what kind of gospel is WMB preaching then? Didn’t Paul warn of such men as preachers of another Jesus? Right there, he hoodwinks the followers and insinuated himself at the expense of scripture. I hesitate to say it, but Paul said of such men “let him be accursed” twice -Galatians 1:8- John, you’re dropping truth bombs and enlightenment for all to see. Simple but very important video, this! 👌🏾👏🏽
The music reminds me of music in another channel about homicide cases and specifically homicide in small towns USA lol. The comparison I draw is that seriously bad things happen where you least expect it.
In my charismatic days I always heard that "logos" was the written Word of God and "rhema" was the spoken Word of God by tongues, prophecy, whatever the "man of God" was saying from the pulpit. Two "Bibles", if you will.
Your message is powerful, but you must find a way to have reach more people. It needs to be heard by the masses so that the cult members break from Branham's spell.
@@ONEin_A_million I think it’s better if you have specific doctrines and you want to know which ones are false. If those preachers are talking about some doctrines, then you want to find out if they’re false or not But here are a few: - his version of marriage & divorce - church ages - Malachi 4:5-6 etc
The gates of hell and no critic will never prevail against the faith or revelation that the true church is built upon....God's truth still marches on... The revelation of Jesus Christ given to us by the prophet William branham fulfilling John's prophecy will transform us on into eternity to our heavenly home.. And all the trinitarians will be wondering why they are getting shot like dogs in the tribulation for rejecting it
@@brothercaleb bro William branham was teaching on marriage and divorce.....and answering the age old question why paul said a man can remarry and a woman can't remarry..... And William branham's answer was because of the polygamy covenant that God began punishes the woman....not the man... Bro William branham wasn't endorsing polygamy again.....he was answering the scriptural question why a man can remarry and why a woman can't remarry.....it is because the polygamy covenant punishes the woman....not the man.... The woman cannot control or be allowed or permitted to prevent a man from being able to reproduce himself .....the man must be allowed to reproduce legitimately so God can call the names off the book of redemption..... If a woman can prevent a man from reproducing himself legitimately by committing adultery....then satan would be able to control or prevent jesus christ from calling the names off the book of redemption by deceiving every woman like eve and getting them to be whores or commit adultery..... The polygamy covenant prevents the woman from having that kind of power / control over a man.....but the devil does his best to try and prevent the man from reproducing himself legitimately..... But loves when they reproduce illegitimately .....
@@dieselcowboy777 first you determine by the Bible who is a prophet and who isn’t, before you let any charlatan tell you that he is “God’s voice to you”
@@dieselcowboy777judge by the fruits than ❤ a man that claims Jesus wasn’t God is demonic a man who than claims to be God is satanic, or maybe his statements about women? Or maybe his ummm friend choice…….. wait Brahman doesn’t cite off the Bible but a magical interpretation that Christian’s had to wait 1800 years to hear and Jesus never spoke of. oKaY😂
Yes. Message believers take the Spoken Word as the Bible. We're taught that The Bible and the Spoken Word are the same. I've always had trouble with that. The Bible was there before the Spoken Word and we're to judge the Spoken Word by the Bible as the Spoken Word does not vindicate the Bible to be true but the Bible should vindicate the Spoken Word to be true.
@@ngangajeremiah9912 you people always avoid the issue that's addressed by giving crazy answers. Why do you take the Spoken Word the same as the Bible? Since when is the Bible compared to the Spoken Word? You people would reject the Bible in split second and choose the Spoken Word. You'd reject Jesus Christ and choose William Branham. That's how deep you people are.
@@restoredtotruth Mr.rtt, you began your post with: " The Spoken Word was before the written Word. Joh 1:1 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." If the term "The Spoken Word" as you state....." was before the written Word....." How can it be the same? and refer TO " and the Word was God"? waiting for your explanation....some of us not so "grown up" as to remotely "read" your thoughts as you imply we know what you are speaking about?..one sentence entry does NOT explain your position? BEFORE you take your post down?.....so my reply read by some one else might not really get your point, by readimg mine.
@@restoredtotruth . Are you not the one posting what you believe to be truth? against documented facts? Facts are stated with evidence. Do we not weigh the evidence and the supporting commentary, then when we make a comment as a post, that statement made reflects your or my belief concerning? that matter. ? Our? statements reveal our LIVING, for they do not come from Outward appearance. We are not? attempting to conform by force anyone to our thoughts, neither is God. This next statement may astonish you: Second Coming of The Lord in glory is NOT the RAPTURE, as you may have been led to believe. Neither is the first resurrection associated with the Rapture. One is in the prophets, the other "Hid in God from before the foundation of the world" If God gives respect to our beliefs and rewards us by the speech we declare, some of us are not going to be "happy campers"???
@@restoredtotruth question arises: 1) Has God added to Scripture ouside of cannon declared between Genisis and Revelations? 2) are we residing/living NOW inside the Day of the Lord as prphets TO Israel declared? answer yes or no.....mr.rtt..
So even here he says WHEN THE ANGEL COMES DOWN (THEN) IT BECOMES THE VOICE OF GOD TO YOU..but some believe that it's all the time the voice of God to you...think about that
Br.Brahnam never ever rejected the holy scripture, he cling to it for he said the bible is God in the form of a letter. You try to talk bad about our prophet for the devil try to use you to get the bride away from the truth, but let me tell you in the name of the Lord Jesus that the bride of Christ cannot be decieve.
From my understanding after listening to the research branham followed Kabbalistic philosophys, doctrines and practices.... Based on information about Colonia Dignadad and the Park ......its not a stretch to consider thats its not just RA but SRA.
3:10 Branham believed that "When the angel of the lord came on Branham he became the voice of God to his congregation !! wow, wow, wow !! we minister by the Holy Spirit, not angels !!
Love the research. However NAR is a cessationist term. And Secondly William Branham with all his faults was still a genuin prophet called by God. We all myst learn from the good in his life and the bad. If your a full blown cessationsit than that's why you have to reject his ministry entirely. However, the Bible is not a cessationist Bible. That's leaven. Thank you for the research nevertheless.
I cant see how he was a genuine prophet. He lied about his doctrine for starters, to some he taught the trinity, to others he did not. He was a preacher to the Klu Klux klan. He only moved in power when his angel was present (that is idolatory), we are supposed to move in the Holy Spirit, He has been poured out on all flesh, not angels... God sends them in answer to our prayers but to pray to them and put our trust in them is idolatory... Derek Prince and his lauderdale 5 distanced themselves from William Branham. Ernie Baxter was Branhams secretary until Branham showed him how he could blow a light bulb with his mind... Derek prince in his book, protection against deception says that Branham moved in the demonic... Later in the 1990s, Clifford Hill refused to do the forward to the kansas city prophets books (1990's) as he discerned an evil spirit operating among them especially Bob Jones. Paul Cain was a child prodigee of Branham...
NAR is a cessationist term. It was a term coined by Wagner in his book Dominion. The AOG stood against dominion theology (latter rain, manifest sons of God, NAR) in the 1950's when Branham brought it into Canada/USA. Dominion theology and its tendency to go beyond scripture to get power is not pentecostal /charismatic doctrine... Bethels Bill Johnson had to separate from the AOG when he seriously got into William branhams teachings.... Clifford Hills church which i visited in 1981 was one of the livest churches i have attended and yet he was against dominion theology and william branham. It was he who refused to do the forward to the kansas city prophets book as he discerned an evil spirit operating among them...
You will answer for this on the day of judgement, together with your followers. William M Branham said he will also answer for his messages. You better be very sure what you are doing and the spirit behind you. I will also answer for my life and this chat message.
Once again still chasing my prophet around & now his page 📃 who ever is doing this against William Branham you need prayer where is the part you say you're a CHRISTIAN but bring down another Brother.....
324 The Word that fell on the Day of Pentecost will not work this day. No, sir. That was for Pentecost. This is for the Bride, going Home of the Bride. We got something different. The Pentecostals represented that, again. We’re in the Bride age. No more than the-the Word of Noah would work in the days of Moses; no more than Moses’ law would have worked in the time of Paul here. 65-1125 - The Invisible Union Of The Bride Of Christ Rev. William Marrion Branham No wonder the elder message preachers are against the gifts of the Holy Spirit and the 5 fold ministry, believing in a 3 fold ministry, it's because of this quote. They've totally misunderstood WB here. If WB was to call the hearts of the children back to the Pentecostal fathers, then why would the Word that fell in Pentecost be not good for this day? How will that Word that fell there not work in this day? Someone please answer me
@@eagleeyes6642 you haven't answered my questions. I know what the Bible says. You can't give someone who's in need of an answer that kind of an answer.
Dino, What did Gentiles have to do with Ceremonies God gave to Israel....NOTHING we were ignorant and without hope, God. Apostle Peter addressed Jews (Acts 2:5,14)
@@restoredtotruth you too haven't answered my questions. I want a direct answer to my questions, not beating around the bush. How am I misinformed about the 5 fold ministry? I believe the bible before I believe the words of William Branham. He would want me to do that. Because the Bible talks about the 5 fold ministry and the in the message we believe in a 3 fold, even though William Branham constantly taught about a 5 fold ministry.
@@restoredtotruth Those who heeded Peter's Sermon, were ALL Circumcised made by hands.....If you or I were to have been present on THAT High Sabbath and we in bravery among all those Jews, queried Peter: Can we partake of your offer also???? ! If our dress does not give us away (Gentiles) our question did? His invitation were TO those commanded by God centuries ago in Deut 16:16; AND those in attendance were some Dan 9:7 referred to!
You don't know this man, this message is not for everyone but for the bride of the Lord Jesus Christ, God took brother Branham because his mission was accomplished.
Why are you lying about Brother William Marrion Branham ? Brother Branham taught his message by teaching Scripture ! The Scripture is the absolute ! The point brother Branham was making was that the Gospel is a progressive revelation . Paul said let us go on to perfection not laying again the foundation ...... Come on ? The Lord opened up the 7 Seals in 1963 ! That is not something better ? Blind Pharisee's
Interesting opinion, friend! Tell me: which "Bible" did this come from?: Quote: And the Bible rights gives any man a right to leave and divorce and leave his wife, that’ll cut her hair. That’s the Bible. That’s THUS SAITH THE LORD. 56-0218E - The Worst Sinner In The City Rev. William Marrion Branham table.branham.org
@@LeavingtheMessage Why don't you guys clean up your own back yard ? You have every kind of mish mash of beliefs amongst yourselves whether it is holiness or your beliefs about the God head ... Some of you are oneness twoness trinitarian etc.? Before you criticize another ministry .... What are you taking your so-called followers to? You claim to be exposing Brother Branham as false ! What is it you believe? Do you have a consensus amongst yourselves? What is your answer to the Word of the day ? You can't answer to the mysteries of God? Where is your man ? As far as a woman cutting her hair Brother Branham agreed with the apostle Paul on that ? So you might want to take up your argument with the Apostle Paul ?
@@LeavingtheMessage Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ. 2Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you. 3But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head. 5But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. 6For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. 7For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. 8For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. 9Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. 10For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.
@@LeavingtheMessage Matthew 19:7 Context 4And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, 5And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? 6Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. 7They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? 8He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. 9And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. 10His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
HOW LONG ARE YOU GOING TO LIE ABOUT THE GOD'S PROPHETE. WE BELIEVE BRANHAM .HE PREACHES THE BIBLE HE SAID HIS ABSLUTE IS THE BIBLE. YOU CUT THE TAPES WHY.?? YES BRANHAM IS ELOHIM VOICE FOR THE BELIEVER AND NO BELIEVER HE IS BOTH GRACE AND JUGEMENT
I think you will find that he preached verses out of context. Our trust should be in Jesus, not William Branham who only moved in power when his angel was present, this is idolatory. God may send an angel in response to our prayers but we are not to pray to them or put our trust in them, that is idolatory.
BRANHAM WAS NEVER A BORN -AGAIN CHRISTIAN WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT HE DID NOT KNOW THE WORD OF GOD JESUS
prove it!
Which world you are living?who could be Malachi 4:5 revelation 10:7 servant? somebody has to be,who could be you tell?it's scripture.
prove it
@ngangajeremiah9912 Branham proved it by his actions. Repent and get saved.
@@shrinivaaspillai6327 I can take one verse out of Scripture, misinterpret it, and add a few others to it and make gullible people believe anything.
So, according to Branham, the only voice of God is when his angel speaks through him.
Jesus said “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.”
Did Branham completely ignore the Holy Ghost in each believer? Is not the Holy Ghost/Spirit of truth the voice of God inside each son and daughter of God?
Branham worked hard on fashioning himself like an Old Testament prophet. He became blind to the New Covenant promise of the Holy Spirit to each believer.
This all ties into today’s two video:
I listen to Bob DeWaay and his Critical Issues Commentary podcast. His podcast are primarily preaching the Gospel. But, he will have segments where he talks more directly about his days in the Shepherding Movement and their deliverance ministries right out of Bible college. He also discusses William Branham, the Word of Faith (WF), the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), and other non-connected ministries that be using the same apostate doctrine, in relation to the Gospel. He's spoken about the enforced piety, the different standards between pastors and the those in the pew, and the leader of that particular ministry being the only one with the great salvation stories. One, being that members were always going to the pastor for deliverance sessions. They were never freed from torment. The reason I'm bringing this up is that between the Bible sermons from Mr. DeWaay and Mr. Collin's experience and research they both complement each other in giving the full picture. And this ties in with the next paragraph.
If you’re not following the Gospel, but being taught to ignore Bible, to follow man’s word, examples such as strange sermons or deliverance practices, the end result can be morbid. And by morbid I mean the lack of an uproar after Bill Johnson, of Bethel Church in Redding California, fails to heal his wife’s cancer. He claims his wife was healed. And he’s doing the same thing that Wm. Branham did but in the internet age.
That is so right!!!
did you know that Bill Johnson wants William Branhams mantle. That half his church left int he 1990's when he seriously got into Branhams teachings and his church had to leave the AOG. Today in Bethels book The Physics of Heaven you can see where all of this leads - to the new age.
It's so awful that this website actually disputes the Word of God!!! The first thing I thought of is that they are pointing out that details in each resurrection story varies to justify the fact that the details (and a lot more than just details) vary in the stories WMB told. It's sickening that they promote their false prophet and to do so they denigrate the Bible.
That's exactly right what bro William branham said......what the apostles said is not enough for today....
The holy ghost was giving us today that which is perfect that the apostles were waiting for....or the perfect interpretation of the word....
The apostles preached that which is in part.....and that is not enough today....we need that which is perfect....
The holy ghost prophecy was in 2 parts not one part.....just like a Chinese token....
The holy ghost gave us the planting rain in the beginning with the apostles.....and the holy ghost gave us the harvest rain with the ministry of bro William branham....
William branham doesn't reject what petee said.....he pointed you to believe what peter said and that is to heed the light that shineth in a dark place.....and that is the light in the evening time....and peter said to be established in the present day truth.....not just the partial truth from 2000 years ago ....the truth is always present day....the light in the evening time at the endtime
Mr DC777, you stated : "William branham doesn't reject what petee said.....he pointed you to believe what peter said and that is to heed the light that shineth in a dark place.....and that is the light in the evening time....and peter said to be established in the present day truth.....not just the partial truth from 2000 years ago ....the truth is always present day....the light in the evening time at the endtime"
But don't you take and promote Acts 2:38 as your " gospel of your salvation"??? And from the time of Peter to present
"gear-shift" by God from "the gospel of the kingdom" to "dispensation of the grace of God" ended? as in terminated by? WB?
@@davidamik5134 i don't know what you are talking about
@@restoredtotruth Correction to your understanding of my response to DC777.... this is what you have reversed in your understanding: FROM "the gospel of the kingdom" TO "dispensation of the grace of God" ended? as in terminated by? WB?
in other words....Did WB terminate or END Paul's grace age message he(Paul) received from Ascended Lord Jesus Christ?
Are we to go back to "gospel of the kingdom" (Mt9:35 and ref's) to under Law program as ministry of J.C. and JTB, the 12 were ? In His earthly ministry J.C. OBSERVED and was under Moses' Law. (Mt 5:17 as were the 12 in Acts.
@@restoredtotruth your entry: "concerning termination, as far as The Bride is concerned, the Laodicean Church Age, has been terminated unto THEM,.. although it is still continuing on within the Church Ages,... it has come to an end to The Bride, when they crossed over to that of the Bride Age.
Those that have not crossed over are fodder for the Tribulation.
Which would make them fall into that of the class of the foolish virgin.
They are virgin to The Word, but are intellectuals, not having the Holy Ghost"
My response:
Supposition, premise ( 7 ages for the Church) for your doctrine NOT supported by Scripture. Revelations concerns Israel and unbelieving
Gentile Nations (Ps2) Church Body of Christ NOT partakers of the WRATH of God.
Read 1/2 Thess Letters...refernced to "Day of the Lord" and O.T. ref'cs for THAT day.
For the "dispensation of the grace of God" is referred to as GRACE AGE, does NOT END until God completes the body of Christ. When that comes ,then
Rapture is "our gathering together unto Him"...."Times of the Gentiles be come in", has no time "signs" other then 2 Tim 3.
"SIGNS" you use for your "rapture" are signs inside Tribulation, (mt 24) .....God advises us NOT to number ourselves as "elect"
for this event!
@@restoredtotruth
what is that foreign sounding phrase we see among these posts???? Ad-Hominem...classic display
of your response here in response for my correction to your mis-understanding OF??...This post: " Correction to your
understanding of my response to DC777.... this is what you have reversed in your understanding: FROM "the gospel of the kingdom" TO "dispensation of the grace of God" ended? as in terminated by? WB?
in other words....Did WB terminate or END Paul's grace age message he(Paul) received from Ascended Lord Jesus Christ?
Are we to go back to "gospel of the kingdom" (Mt9:35 and ref's) to under Law program as ministry of J.C. and JTB, the 12 were ? In His earthly ministry J.C. OBSERVED and was under Moses' Law. (Mt 5:17 as were the 12 in Acts."
ad hominem def: ADJ "of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining:"
ADV "in a way that is DIRECTED AGAINST a person RATHER than the POSITION they are MAINTAINING:"
Seems this is your tactic in most of your responses/posts. Instead of enligtening us further of the basis of your doctrines
you INstead resort to AD-HOMINEM attacks. The question posed is/was : ".Did WB terminate or END Paul's grace age
message he(Paul) received from Ascended Lord Jesus Christ?
then branhamites are not christians 🤞☝️they are like mormons, AdvenTWIST, & branch davidians ☝️🤞
Modern day Pharisees and Sadducees
1:58 “the word that fell on the day of Pentecost will not work this day”????? 😮😮🤔
You’ve got to be kidding me! So everything that Peter said as the result of receiving the Holy Ghost that day, about baptism in the name of Jesus and promise of salvation to “all who are far off -for all whom the lord WILL call…” and the rest of Acts chapter 2 does not work today?
And his followers call him the “word prophet”? If Paul Baptized according to the word that fell on that day which instructed Peter to issue a baptismal prescription for the gospel, what kind of gospel is WMB preaching then? Didn’t Paul warn of such men as preachers of another Jesus?
Right there, he hoodwinks the followers and insinuated himself at the expense of scripture. I hesitate to say it, but Paul said of such men “let him be accursed” twice -Galatians 1:8-
John, you’re dropping truth bombs and enlightenment for all to see. Simple but very important video, this! 👌🏾👏🏽
Truth hydrogen bombs!!!
Revelation 22:16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches.
The music reminds me of music in another channel about homicide cases and specifically homicide in small towns USA lol. The comparison I draw is that seriously bad things happen where you least expect it.
In my charismatic days I always heard that "logos" was the written Word of God and "rhema" was the spoken Word of God by tongues, prophecy, whatever the "man of God" was saying from the pulpit. Two "Bibles", if you will.
Your message is powerful, but you must find a way to have reach more people. It needs to be heard by the masses so that the cult members break from Branham's spell.
One way is for all of us to click that like button and share these videos and subscribe. The author is also on Facebook now meta, of course
does branham doctrines are false....pls clarify me.....I am going through some preachers now....😕☹️
@@ONEin_A_million I think it’s better if you have specific doctrines and you want to know which ones are false. If those preachers are talking about some doctrines, then you want to find out if they’re false or not
But here are a few:
- his version of marriage & divorce
- church ages
- Malachi 4:5-6 etc
The gates of hell and no critic will never prevail against the faith or revelation that the true church is built upon....God's truth still marches on...
The revelation of Jesus Christ given to us by the prophet William branham fulfilling John's prophecy will transform us on into eternity to our heavenly home..
And all the trinitarians will be wondering why they are getting shot like dogs in the tribulation for rejecting it
@@brothercaleb bro William branham was teaching on marriage and divorce.....and answering the age old question why paul said a man can remarry and a woman can't remarry.....
And William branham's answer was because of the polygamy covenant that God began punishes the woman....not the man...
Bro William branham wasn't endorsing polygamy again.....he was answering the scriptural question why a man can remarry and why a woman can't remarry.....it is because the polygamy covenant punishes the woman....not the man....
The woman cannot control or be allowed or permitted to prevent a man from being able to reproduce himself .....the man must be allowed to reproduce legitimately so God can call the names off the book of redemption.....
If a woman can prevent a man from reproducing himself legitimately by committing adultery....then satan would be able to control or prevent jesus christ from calling the names off the book of redemption by deceiving every woman like eve and getting them to be whores or commit adultery.....
The polygamy covenant prevents the woman from having that kind of power / control over a man.....but the devil does his best to try and prevent the man from reproducing himself legitimately.....
But loves when they reproduce illegitimately .....
The Lord bless you again, brother John.
Excellent job exposing the wolves in sheep' clothes. I can support with French translation if that is an avenue you are interested in.
Absolutely! Contact us at william-branham.org/site/contact
“I am God’s voice to you”… hypnotism in all its glory.
No that is what a prophet is....God's voice to you
@@dieselcowboy777 first you determine by the Bible who is a prophet and who isn’t, before you let any charlatan tell you that he is “God’s voice to you”
@@georgesmyrnis1742 and you also determine by the bible the wicked and ungodly charlatans that reject and withstand a true prophet....
@@dieselcowboy777 someone looks like they are avoiding the Bible.
@@dieselcowboy777judge by the fruits than ❤ a man that claims Jesus wasn’t God is demonic a man who than claims to be God is satanic, or maybe his statements about women? Or maybe his ummm friend choice…….. wait Brahman doesn’t cite off the Bible but a magical interpretation that Christian’s had to wait 1800 years to hear and Jesus never spoke of. oKaY😂
Lord have mercy
William Branham was a true Prophet of God, sent by God in 1946, he was born for that purpose. and he fulfilled his calling.
Yes. Message believers take the Spoken Word as the Bible. We're taught that The Bible and the Spoken Word are the same. I've always had trouble with that. The Bible was there before the Spoken Word and we're to judge the Spoken Word by the Bible as the Spoken Word does not vindicate the Bible to be true but the Bible should vindicate the Spoken Word to be true.
who is forcing you to believe Branham's message?
@@ngangajeremiah9912 you people always avoid the issue that's addressed by giving crazy answers. Why do you take the Spoken Word the same as the Bible? Since when is the Bible compared to the Spoken Word? You people would reject the Bible in split second and choose the Spoken Word. You'd reject Jesus Christ and choose William Branham. That's how deep you people are.
@@restoredtotruth Mr.rtt, you began your post with: " The Spoken Word was before the written Word. Joh 1:1 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
If the term "The Spoken Word" as you state....." was before the written Word....." How can it be the same? and refer TO
" and the Word was God"? waiting for your explanation....some of us not so "grown up" as to remotely "read" your thoughts
as you imply we know what you are speaking about?..one sentence entry does NOT explain your position?
BEFORE you take your post down?.....so my reply read by some one else might not really get your point, by readimg mine.
@@restoredtotruth . Are you not the one posting what you believe to be truth? against documented facts? Facts are stated
with evidence. Do we not weigh the evidence and the supporting commentary, then when we make a comment as a post, that
statement made reflects your or my belief concerning? that matter. ? Our? statements reveal our LIVING, for they do not
come from Outward appearance. We are not? attempting to conform by force anyone to our thoughts, neither is God.
This next statement may astonish you: Second Coming of The Lord in glory is NOT the RAPTURE, as you may have been
led to believe. Neither is the first resurrection associated with the Rapture. One is in the prophets, the other "Hid in God from
before the foundation of the world" If God gives respect to our beliefs and rewards us by the speech we declare, some of us
are not going to be "happy campers"???
@@restoredtotruth question arises: 1) Has God added to Scripture ouside of cannon declared between Genisis and
Revelations?
2) are we residing/living NOW inside the Day of the Lord as prphets TO Israel declared?
answer yes or no.....mr.rtt..
Requesting that you cover pastor charles dowell and the straitway cult
The VOICE makes the difference....
Hell of a cult!
That clip at the end - creepy.
So even here he says WHEN THE ANGEL COMES DOWN (THEN) IT BECOMES THE VOICE OF GOD TO YOU..but some believe that it's all the time the voice of God to you...think about that
Br.Brahnam never ever rejected the holy scripture, he cling to it for he said the bible is God in the form of a letter. You try to talk bad about our prophet for the devil try to use you to get the bride away from the truth, but let me tell you in the name of the Lord Jesus that the bride of Christ cannot be decieve.
Is his church a cult?
Was the Pope Catholic?
@@kaybrown4010 No 😂
From my understanding after listening to the research branham followed Kabbalistic philosophys, doctrines and practices....
Based on information about Colonia Dignadad and the Park ......its not a stretch to consider thats its not just RA but SRA.
3:10 Branham believed that "When the angel of the lord came on Branham he became the voice of God to his congregation !! wow, wow, wow !!
we minister by the Holy Spirit, not angels !!
That was the expression of the *Annoiting* . What do you believe any way?
William Branhamnever rejected the Bible
Brother William Marrion Branham did not reject the Bible
God voice to you which god is that Not the God of the Bible for sure !
A very humble servant of the Lord no wonder you guys in ghe theological fields differ from him he was presenting bridal food
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👍👍
Love the research. However NAR is a cessationist term. And Secondly William Branham with all his faults was still a genuin prophet called by God. We all myst learn from the good in his life and the bad. If your a full blown cessationsit than that's why you have to reject his ministry entirely. However, the Bible is not a cessationist Bible. That's leaven. Thank you for the research nevertheless.
You just don't get it friend. False profit he was.
I cant see how he was a genuine prophet. He lied about his doctrine for starters, to some he taught the trinity, to others he did not. He was a preacher to the Klu Klux klan. He only moved in power when his angel was present (that is idolatory), we are supposed to move in the Holy Spirit, He has been poured out on all flesh, not angels... God sends them in answer to our prayers but to pray to them and put our trust in them is idolatory...
Derek Prince and his lauderdale 5 distanced themselves from William Branham. Ernie Baxter was Branhams secretary until Branham showed him how he could blow a light bulb with his mind...
Derek prince in his book, protection against deception says that Branham moved in the demonic...
Later in the 1990s, Clifford Hill refused to do the forward to the kansas city prophets books (1990's) as he discerned an evil spirit operating among them especially Bob Jones.
Paul Cain was a child prodigee of Branham...
NAR is a cessationist term. It was a term coined by Wagner in his book Dominion. The AOG stood against dominion theology (latter rain, manifest sons of God, NAR) in the 1950's when Branham brought it into Canada/USA.
Dominion theology and its tendency to go beyond scripture to get power is not pentecostal /charismatic doctrine...
Bethels Bill Johnson had to separate from the AOG when he seriously got into William branhams teachings....
Clifford Hills church which i visited in 1981 was one of the livest churches i have attended and yet he was against dominion theology and william branham. It was he who refused to do the forward to the kansas city prophets book as he discerned an evil spirit operating among them...
Acts 2:38 is still intact in the Message
You will answer for this on the day of judgement, together with your followers. William M Branham said he will also answer for his messages. You better be very sure what you are doing and the spirit behind you. I will also answer for my life and this chat message.
Get a grip, plz
You can not receive the gift of the Holy Ghost if you don't believe this message
William Branham never rejected the bible but preached it, let the dogs bark our MESSAGE caravan is moving on
WILLIAM BRANHAM THE PROPHET OF THE MOST HIGH.🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💯%.👍👍
Absolutely
The word prophet means : Devine interpreter of God's word.... GOD WILL DO NOTHING BUT REVEAL HIS WORD BY HIS PROPHETS. SHALOM
Once again still chasing my prophet around & now his page 📃 who ever is doing this against William Branham you need prayer where is the part you say you're a CHRISTIAN but bring down another Brother.....
prayers for what? do you think you can convert the devil? call white white & Black black, that's the devil!
324 The Word that fell on the Day of Pentecost will not work this day. No, sir. That was for Pentecost. This is for the Bride, going Home of the Bride. We got something different. The Pentecostals represented that, again. We’re in the Bride age. No more than the-the Word of Noah would work in the days of Moses; no more than Moses’ law would have worked in the time of Paul here.
65-1125 - The Invisible Union Of The Bride Of Christ
Rev. William Marrion Branham
No wonder the elder message preachers are against the gifts of the Holy Spirit and the 5 fold ministry, believing in a 3 fold ministry, it's because of this quote. They've totally misunderstood WB here.
If WB was to call the hearts of the children back to the Pentecostal fathers, then why would the Word that fell in Pentecost be not good for this day? How will that Word that fell there not work in this day? Someone please answer me
@@eagleeyes6642 you haven't answered my questions. I know what the Bible says. You can't give someone who's in need of an answer that kind of an answer.
Dino, What did Gentiles have to do with Ceremonies God gave to Israel....NOTHING we were ignorant and without hope, God.
Apostle Peter addressed Jews (Acts 2:5,14)
@@restoredtotruth you too haven't answered my questions. I want a direct answer to my questions, not beating around the bush.
How am I misinformed about the 5 fold ministry? I believe the bible before I believe the words of William Branham. He would want me to do that. Because the Bible talks about the 5 fold ministry and the in the message we believe in a 3 fold, even though William Branham constantly taught about a 5 fold ministry.
@@restoredtotruth God richly bless you man of God. Thank you so much for answering me. I am blessed
@@restoredtotruth Those who heeded Peter's Sermon, were ALL Circumcised made by hands.....If you or I were to
have been present on THAT High Sabbath and we in bravery among all those Jews, queried Peter: Can we partake of your
offer also???? ! If our dress does not give us away (Gentiles) our question did? His invitation were TO those commanded by
God centuries ago in Deut 16:16; AND those in attendance were some Dan 9:7 referred to!
I can see why God took Branham's life. Blasphemer!
You don't know this man, this message is not for everyone but for the bride of the Lord Jesus Christ, God took brother Branham because his mission was accomplished.
Why are you lying about Brother William Marrion Branham ? Brother Branham taught his message by teaching Scripture ! The Scripture is the absolute ! The point brother Branham was making was that the Gospel is a progressive revelation . Paul said let us go on to perfection not laying again the foundation ...... Come on ? The Lord opened up the 7 Seals in 1963 ! That is not something better ? Blind Pharisee's
Interesting opinion, friend!
Tell me: which "Bible" did this come from?:
Quote:
And the Bible rights gives any man a right to leave and divorce and leave his wife, that’ll cut her hair. That’s the Bible. That’s THUS SAITH THE LORD.
56-0218E - The Worst Sinner In The City
Rev. William Marrion Branham
table.branham.org
@@LeavingtheMessage Why don't you guys clean up your own back yard ? You have every kind of mish mash of beliefs amongst yourselves whether it is holiness or your beliefs about the God head ... Some of you are oneness twoness trinitarian etc.? Before you criticize another ministry .... What are you taking your so-called followers to? You claim to be exposing Brother Branham as false ! What is it you believe? Do you have a consensus amongst yourselves? What is your answer to the Word of the day ? You can't answer to the mysteries of God? Where is your man ? As far as a woman cutting her hair Brother Branham agreed with the apostle Paul on that ? So you might want to take up your argument with the Apostle Paul ?
@@stevenasser368 Still waiting for your answer on which "Bible" this "Thus Saith the Lord" came from, and how this "Scripture" is "absolute".
@@LeavingtheMessage Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.
2Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.
3But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
4Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
5But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
6For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
7For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
8For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
9Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
10For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.
@@LeavingtheMessage Matthew 19:7 Context
4And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, 5And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? 6Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. 7They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? 8He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. 9And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. 10His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
HOW LONG ARE YOU GOING TO LIE ABOUT THE GOD'S PROPHETE. WE BELIEVE BRANHAM .HE PREACHES THE BIBLE HE SAID HIS ABSLUTE IS THE BIBLE.
YOU CUT THE TAPES WHY.??
YES BRANHAM IS ELOHIM VOICE FOR THE BELIEVER AND NO BELIEVER HE IS BOTH GRACE AND JUGEMENT
Branham isn’t God’s prophet!
I think you will find that he preached verses out of context. Our trust should be in Jesus, not William Branham who only moved in power when his angel was present, this is idolatory. God may send an angel in response to our prayers but we are not to pray to them or put our trust in them, that is idolatory.
@@MrJRice3190 who is it then, who is Malachi 4 :5, revelation 10 vs 7
@@JuliexSteadman do you know the angel that moved with the Israelites when they were coming out of Egypt
@@FaithKasakula-n1m ..that was The Angel of The Lord who people worshipped. He was the pre-incarnate Jesus..
I don't blame you John, you're blind. May Almighty God forgive you.
Who are u to call someone blind?
@@Blessed628just a message cult follower trying to distract. Just another heretic following Branham into hell
Try removing the massive log in your eye before you concern yourself about the supposed specks on Bro John Collin’s eyes!
I think its good to stick to attacking the argument rather than the person, otherwise you dont learn anything..