Minelab CTX 3030 vs / compared to Equinox 800 park hunt

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @ronalddvorak1967
    @ronalddvorak1967 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You did a great job comparing the 2 detectors.

    • @metaldetectingnut4839
      @metaldetectingnut4839  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! I was really hoping to find a silver while I was trying this. Maybe next time.

  • @JJJAMES444
    @JJJAMES444 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sweet Hunt Brotha I like your style of detecting! Both of my favorite machines!

  • @warriorhook
    @warriorhook 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just curious I was thinking of getting a Ctx 3030 why are the I’d numbers so different on the same target

  • @wingrovedl
    @wingrovedl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the comparison tests in the real world. I have the CTX3030, I see all the rave reviews about the EQ800. But to tell you the truth, I don't really see one over the other, a few extra things that the CTX can do over the EQ. But, like you said "Price is a differance". I was wondering about battery life, if one lasts very much longer then the other. Never hear about the battery life comparisons. GL&HH

    • @metaldetectingnut4839
      @metaldetectingnut4839  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      wingrovedl , funny you should bring up battery life. I just noticed on my last couple hunts that my CTX3030 lasts about twice as long. The battery is about 6 years old. While my Nox800 battery is brand new.

    • @wingrovedl
      @wingrovedl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@metaldetectingnut4839 Thanks for that. One more + for the CTX. LOL LOl Lol lol

  • @stevedee1711
    @stevedee1711 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WHy did you think wheat? THe numvers were all over on the Nox.

    • @metaldetectingnut4839
      @metaldetectingnut4839  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most of the time I detect by sound, then depth, then I finally look at the numbers. This one was giving me a nice consistent high tone (tone #4). If it would have been silver it probably would have given me a higher tone (tone #5) more consistently. I really like the 5 tone separation that Minelab offers. In the area that I was hunting most of the wheat pennies and silver coins were at 3 to 4 bars down on the Nox. 5 to 6 inches down with the CTX 3030. If the depth would have been 2 bars (4 inches) or less, I would have guessed a memorial penny. The numbers do bounce around a lot with the nox, but it was staying anywhere from 24 to 32. But by far I do mostly rely on the sound and depth more.

  • @WeirdGuyInPark
    @WeirdGuyInPark 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparision....

  • @DiggingRob
    @DiggingRob 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the real world test.....there both great detectors ......CTX has a tad better target ID & better depth meter .......Nox is a heck lighter & cheaper.

  • @wizardsofwisconsin7400
    @wizardsofwisconsin7400 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done nut!

  • @therrienmichael08
    @therrienmichael08 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Subscribed

  • @102Montana
    @102Montana 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Favorite yet?

    • @metaldetectingnut4839
      @metaldetectingnut4839  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I still keep going back to the 3030. I like the depth reading of actual depth in inches compared to the marks on the 800. I also prefer the number read-out stability of the 3030 compared to the 800. It doesn't jump around as much. But.... for water detecting i take the 800 all day long.

  • @exploracionesconluis102
    @exploracionesconluis102 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At 7:04 you can see that ctx is more acurrate at Id that piece of foil and nox was giving a very good signal when it was trash. At beach ctx is a lot better and dont pick up so much trash

    • @metaldetectingnut4839
      @metaldetectingnut4839  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great catch. I really like the CTX for the discrimination features.

  • @clarkfox7961
    @clarkfox7961 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The ctx is just to heavy in my opinion

  • @algiscepulis3190
    @algiscepulis3190 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    800 geresnis zimiai