Nice ! My favorite thesis is Novopangea , why obeys the east Africa rifting, obeys the Mediterranean Sea closure and obeys the Atlântic ocean expansion.
My favourite is Aurica because it follows the scenario of both the Atlantic and the Pacific closing and I find also find it really interesting that Eurasia splits.
Syntomapangaea is a supercontinent model I propose, it means "Soon all Earth". It is based off of Pangaea Proxima but with differences. The Eastern Atlantic becomes a separate plate and begins subducting under Europe and Africa East Africa becomes severed but eventually stalls and becomes a pseudo Madagascar in the Afroeurasian Plate Both sides of the Atlantic will develop subduction zones and island chains Antarctica is severed, West Antarctica becomes part of the South American Plate, East Antarctica eventually latches on to Afroeurasia's Indian Ocean subduction zone Syntomapangaea's forms around 0N/S 0E/W but eventually migrates to be a northern polar landmass
I believe that Amasia is probably the most likely future supercontinent mode. It follows the current trend of the subduction of the Pacific, which has been going on since Pangaea broke up, as well as recognizing it is unlikely for Africa to split in two, given that the East African Rift is the slowest-growing arm of the Afar Triple Junction, and is likely to die down and become an aulacogen. It also recognizes the African and Pacific Large Low-Shear Velocity Provinces as a barrier to both Antarctica and South America crossing the Pacific. It is also based on studies of the latitude of ancient supercontinents which conclude that they form roughly 90 degrees away from their predecessors. Novopangaea may not be possible, both because of the previous issues I pointed out with the presence of LLSVPs blocking convergent plate tectonics in the Pacific and the EAR's slow growth, but also because the Earth's mantle may be too cool for an extroversion cycle to begin. While Aurica and Pangaea Proxima both continue the Atlantic's Wilson Cycle, Aurica is an unlikely outcome as it is not likely the Baikal Rift will form a new ocean, and Scotese's Pangaea Proxima model relies on a faulty understanding of how subduction zones form; it assumes that they occur when oceanic crust becomes old and dense enough, while current evidence suggests they form around pre-existing zones of weakness like strike-slip faults or deactivated divergent plate boundaries.
I'm more a fan of novopangea, because extroversion is more likely than introversion. The 5th model (amasia but better) is even likelier due to othroversion, and it's better than the original because Antarctica must move SOMEWHERE.
The third one is probably the most suitable continent for life in the future. Considering the sun’s luminosity is going to have increased by then, the equator would become way too hot, so most of the land being on the poles is the best
I mostly follow the Aurica hypothesis but with a few modifications. Based on the idea of the African Rift growing, both North and South. This would split Eurasia and Antarctica as well, forming a new Siberian Ocean. In addition, Nubia will merge with Eurasia enclosing the Black Sea and forming a Mediterranean Mountain range. Australia will dock with Eurasia around 100 million years from now when the Siberian Ocean first opens up. The new Australasia continent would begin moving farther south accelerating the closure of the Pacific while Chukotka attaches to Alaska, Similar to Scotese’s prediction, about 100-125 million years from now, the Atlantic will start to shrink with South and North America both approaching Nubia. Contrasting with Scotese the Australasian and Somalian continents will continue East to merge with the Americas on the West, South and North America will wrap around Western Nubia. Antarctica will be located on the southern edge of the landmass possibly scooped up by South America. This will likely be the last of the major landmasses to merge with the rest. Somalia will attach shortly after by about 300 million years from now, forming a modified version of Aurica. Now I just need to name it.
this looks like its modeled with gplates or a similar program. in gplates, you cant edit how the terrain looks until you go in and manually edit the year. when there are 200 years (in millions), its very hard to edit every one for realism, instead changing it every 50 million years or so
There are problems with all three versions. Two of them , ignore the Great Rift Valley, in Africa. The middles, has issues with Madagascar not moving, and Antarctica staying still.
The Great Rift Valley is unlikely to break Africa in half because neighboring rifts are growing faster. Antarctica is barred from moving north by hot mantle plumes in the Pacific.
I think a combination of 1 and 2 is what I think is going to happen. I think east Africa is going to rift and the Atlantic is going to expand and then subduct.
But now they'll have to add a detail to the most plausible scenario here: the recently discussed Indian subcontinental re-detachment. PS: Aurica IMO is least likely because there's almost no tangible proof of the Baikal rift valley going full split mode. Plus, the west Gondwanaland (Africa/SA) re-visitation thing--minus the African Rift Valley split, yet--just seems like lazy conjecture. If the Mediterranean is gonna close to varying degrees in all 4 (5) possibilities regardless, how does this happen? Also, kindly notice that the Scotese model is the only one that shows the Iberian peninsula breaking off with Africa's northward push...as well as the aforementioned lack of the African rifting. Amasia ignores this, too. Finally---and oddest of all--is Scotese being the only one to include the San Andreas/Cascade fault system activity. After all, it is most likely to happen since tectonic activity is easier to predict with a more recent timescale. Thanks.
Epic proposals of the changes the planet will experience, shame the plate boundaries where not shown, we could really appreciate the movement easier, to see how the floating crust is added to or lost..Especially when some contients reverse track!
2 and 5 seem to be the more likely scenarios considering they include both the understanding that the Pacific Ocean is closing up and Africa will eventually split into two.
Aurica is my favorite model because it breaks Eurasia into 2 parts and apparently makes Arabia, Iran, and Central Asia no longer have any connection with East Asia, South Asia, and the ASEAN. What I'm not sure now is what parts of Russia and Mongolia will be separated according to Aurica? What is the exact boundary of this separation? 1.Aurica 2. Your Amasia 3. Novopangea (separating East Africa and relocating it to India) 4. Pangea Proxima 5. Amasia
Amasia: Antarctica: Hello Stupidos im Stay in my current position Russia: Hello USA Stupido Usa: IS THIS PANGEA Russia: this is not pangea this is amasia Brazil:hello Fat Atlantic Ocean Australia: Hello USA I'm near u USA: hello Australia I'm near u too
The Australian plate moves around 62-70 mm (2.44-2.75 inches) per year in the direction of the north. It is predicted that the northern motion of the Australian plate will eventually make it bump against the Pacific Superplume, and change its course to collide with East and Southeast Asia. Some models predict it will go as far as Russia and Alaska.
Truth is these are all Theories here we May never know what Future of Continents out here will look alike we will be long dead when that happens out here.
Fun fact:a supportive continent formed in 350 million years ago now formed supportive continent in Africa is top amasia formed,when im model:its the supportive of the landmark and the landmass Himalayan eras rush away,Antarctica will not reach amasia the supportive continent this will be a constant,200 million years ago before pangea formed formed the mass.
La grieta del este de áfrica es poco probable que se divida el continente por le mitad, porque los grietas próximas están creciendo más rapido. Probablemente se dejará de creciendo en lugar de formar un nuevo océano.
Me gusta el modelo de pangea ultima porque Africa se puede unir con eurasia formando afre-eurasia y tambien australia se puede unir con la parte de Indonesia y Malasia Formando austro-afre-eurasia Y América del norte puede colisonar con rusia.
![[Part 1] รักมาไม่ทันตั้งตัว❤ หนุ่มสาวโสดถูกจับมาแต่งงานกันกะทันหัน แถมเธอยังเป็นหัวหน้าของเขา?!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/y2pOOMkuFI0/mqdefault.jpg)
Nice ! My favorite thesis is Novopangea , why obeys the east Africa rifting, obeys the Mediterranean Sea closure and obeys the Atlântic ocean expansion.
It is the truth
The other rifts in the Afar triple junction are spreading faster though. The East African rift will probably become an aulacogen/failed rift
i agree
My favourite is Aurica because it follows the scenario of both the Atlantic and the Pacific closing and I find also find it really interesting that Eurasia splits.
What about San Andreas?
Nobody:
Antarctica in the Amasia model: I'm just chillin here.
Sorry if i copied you
@@Gacura997 you didn't copy me. You actually made that comment before I did. I just made a variation of that joke.
Which amasia
@@KBoden1973 first one
Pangaea Promixa be like:
USA: lemme just snatch thst from russia
Syntomapangaea is a supercontinent model I propose, it means "Soon all Earth".
It is based off of Pangaea Proxima but with differences.
The Eastern Atlantic becomes a separate plate and begins subducting under Europe and Africa
East Africa becomes severed but eventually stalls and becomes a pseudo Madagascar in the Afroeurasian Plate
Both sides of the Atlantic will develop subduction zones and island chains
Antarctica is severed, West Antarctica becomes part of the South American Plate, East Antarctica eventually latches on to Afroeurasia's Indian Ocean subduction zone
Syntomapangaea's forms around 0N/S 0E/W but eventually migrates to be a northern polar landmass
I believe that Amasia is probably the most likely future supercontinent mode. It follows the current trend of the subduction of the Pacific, which has been going on since Pangaea broke up, as well as recognizing it is unlikely for Africa to split in two, given that the East African Rift is the slowest-growing arm of the Afar Triple Junction, and is likely to die down and become an aulacogen. It also recognizes the African and Pacific Large Low-Shear Velocity Provinces as a barrier to both Antarctica and South America crossing the Pacific. It is also based on studies of the latitude of ancient supercontinents which conclude that they form roughly 90 degrees away from their predecessors. Novopangaea may not be possible, both because of the previous issues I pointed out with the presence of LLSVPs blocking convergent plate tectonics in the Pacific and the EAR's slow growth, but also because the Earth's mantle may be too cool for an extroversion cycle to begin. While Aurica and Pangaea Proxima both continue the Atlantic's Wilson Cycle, Aurica is an unlikely outcome as it is not likely the Baikal Rift will form a new ocean, and Scotese's Pangaea Proxima model relies on a faulty understanding of how subduction zones form; it assumes that they occur when oceanic crust becomes old and dense enough, while current evidence suggests they form around pre-existing zones of weakness like strike-slip faults or deactivated divergent plate boundaries.
I AINT READIN ALLAT
@@AbnormallyHotSausageHalloweenme when i have short attention span:
I’m glad I found this! Great job!
Glad you like it!
@@terraspace1100that pangea proxima is so stupid try my pangea proxima instead
Thanks! This is lovely! You even show some continental crust being uplifted or created!
My favourite future supercontinents:
1. Novopangaea and your Amasia
2. Amasia and Pangaea Proxima
3. Aurica
I Like The One That Makes Mongolia Have A Coastline
@@help-me-im-lukeand split have i kinda hate it because is kinda of remove my traveled place
1:12 soth america: uh nothing happened
I'm more a fan of novopangea, because extroversion is more likely than introversion. The 5th model (amasia but better) is even likelier due to othroversion, and it's better than the original because Antarctica must move SOMEWHERE.
RIP that piece of New Zealand though
The third one is probably the most suitable continent for life in the future. Considering the sun’s luminosity is going to have increased by then, the equator would become way too hot, so most of the land being on the poles is the best
the piece of Antarctica is not hitting it, it is flying 0:32
I mostly follow the Aurica hypothesis but with a few modifications.
Based on the idea of the African Rift growing, both North and South. This would split Eurasia and Antarctica as well, forming a new Siberian Ocean.
In addition, Nubia will merge with Eurasia enclosing the Black Sea and forming a Mediterranean Mountain range. Australia will dock with Eurasia around 100 million years from now when the Siberian Ocean first opens up. The new Australasia continent would begin moving farther south accelerating the closure of the Pacific while Chukotka attaches to Alaska,
Similar to Scotese’s prediction, about 100-125 million years from now, the Atlantic will start to shrink with South and North America both approaching Nubia. Contrasting with Scotese the Australasian and Somalian continents will continue East to merge with the Americas on the West, South and North America will wrap around Western Nubia. Antarctica will be located on the southern edge of the landmass possibly scooped up by South America. This will likely be the last of the major landmasses to merge with the rest. Somalia will attach shortly after by about 300 million years from now, forming a modified version of Aurica.
Now I just need to name it.
Model 6 : my prediction
After 1 million year : water
Haha
I made a pangea proxima with the countries
@@ThajuApsee who asked 🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
the first amasia be like: all the continents go up except Antarctica
"Why? Cause fuck 'em that's why."
-Plate tectonics
The New Zealand's South Island too!
This is great! Although sometime islands seem to go into each other, if you happen to do this again, could you fix that?
this looks like its modeled with gplates or a similar program. in gplates, you cant edit how the terrain looks until you go in and manually edit the year. when there are 200 years (in millions), its very hard to edit every one for realism, instead changing it every 50 million years or so
That's probably a result of inaccurately preserving present-day national borders and island outlines.
Model 3: _Antarctica has left the chat_
There are problems with all three versions. Two of them , ignore the Great Rift Valley, in Africa. The middles, has issues with Madagascar not moving, and Antarctica staying still.
The Great Rift Valley is unlikely to break Africa in half because neighboring rifts are growing faster. Antarctica is barred from moving north by hot mantle plumes in the Pacific.
This is endlessly fascinating, seeing how the present earth came to be.
I think a combination of 1 and 2 is what I think is going to happen. I think east Africa is going to rift and the Atlantic is going to expand and then subduct.
The big "4" is a challenge
But now they'll have to add a detail to the most plausible scenario here: the recently discussed Indian subcontinental re-detachment.
PS: Aurica IMO is least likely because there's almost no tangible proof of the Baikal rift valley going full split mode. Plus, the west Gondwanaland (Africa/SA) re-visitation thing--minus the African Rift Valley split, yet--just seems like lazy conjecture. If the Mediterranean is gonna close to varying degrees in all 4 (5) possibilities regardless, how does this happen?
Also, kindly notice that the Scotese model is the only one that shows the Iberian peninsula breaking off with Africa's northward push...as well as the aforementioned lack of the African rifting. Amasia ignores this, too. Finally---and oddest of all--is Scotese being the only one to include the San Andreas/Cascade fault system activity. After all, it is most likely to happen since tectonic activity is easier to predict with a more recent timescale.
Thanks.
I love the 4 videos you made 😊
I bet Model 1. Looking forward the results.
Nice Bro You Made Supercontinents Im Adding You To My Best friend List
Ok cool
Oh uhm ok
@@terraspace1100Տᗩᗰᗴ
Amazing video, I love you
Epic proposals of the changes the planet will experience, shame the plate boundaries where not shown, we could really appreciate the movement easier, to see how the floating crust is added to or lost..Especially when some contients reverse track!
nice video,could you tell me how you named these continents?
Someone else did
My fav future supercontinent in dis vid is Aurica
How did you implement this simulation?
2 and 5 seem to be the more likely scenarios considering they include both the understanding that the Pacific Ocean is closing up and Africa will eventually split into two.
North america in the Pangea proxima model
Russia:North America!You finally joined us!
North America:Nah I’m just taking some land ok bye
My favorite is Novopangea
Aurica is my favorite model because it breaks Eurasia into 2 parts and apparently makes Arabia, Iran, and Central Asia no longer have any connection with East Asia, South Asia, and the ASEAN. What I'm not sure now is what parts of Russia and Mongolia will be separated according to Aurica? What is the exact boundary of this separation?
1.Aurica
2. Your Amasia
3. Novopangea (separating East Africa and relocating it to India)
4. Pangea Proxima
5. Amasia
So isnt that means if the past about 250mya it will make pangea
When do you khow about the future?
By studying current plate motions and other related stuff to that, we can generate a hypothesis about the future of Earth's continents.
nice!
Thanks!
A bit too fast but really interesting....
In Amasia (not yours)
Antarctica.exe has stopped working.
Nice
In Pangea Proxima:
The americas: alright ima head over to the pacifi- nvm im going back
Amasia:
Antarctica: Hello Stupidos im Stay in my current position
Russia: Hello USA Stupido
Usa: IS THIS PANGEA
Russia: this is not pangea this is amasia
Brazil:hello Fat Atlantic Ocean
Australia: Hello USA I'm near u
USA: hello Australia I'm near u too
what do you use to make this😅
@@Ethan_Boy2909 GPlates
A lot more better
When do the continents fall off the edge of the earth?
@@googleisfascist9278 Do you believe that the Earth is flat?
Actually, Earth or Terra is round but slightly oval. 🤓
@@terraspace1100Nope, it's shaped imperfectly like a sphere
Nice Australia why obeys if this happens in the future I will freak out😮😮😮😮😮
Amasia be like: f*ck it, NORTH
Novopangæa makes the most sense ngl
I like how in 100 Ma, the USA takes a part of russia to remember his former friend
Antarctica: i Will spot The South America for you africa South America: nooooooooo Africa: Oh Yeah
How tou made that? I cant even using gplates
Look in Artifexian's channel for GPlates tutorial videos
Ok
Wait, how is Phillpines in Australia?
1:50 That's Not Aurica
3:19 Syntomapangea
Australia moving up north a lot
The Australian plate moves around 62-70 mm (2.44-2.75 inches) per year in the direction of the north. It is predicted that the northern motion of the Australian plate will eventually make it bump against the Pacific Superplume, and change its course to collide with East and Southeast Asia. Some models predict it will go as far as Russia and Alaska.
How to do?
Truth is these are all Theories here we May never know what Future of Continents out here will look alike we will be long dead when that happens out here.
What’s with Australia moving upwards in every simulation?
Australia currently moves 5-6 cm per year northward. This is why all of the models show Australia moving up.
Fun fact:a supportive continent formed in 350 million years ago now formed supportive continent in Africa is top amasia formed,when im model:its the supportive of the landmark and the landmass Himalayan eras rush away,Antarctica will not reach amasia the supportive continent this will be a constant,200 million years ago before pangea formed formed the mass.
Why is this 5 future???
1:22
Es probable que Novopangea sea el surpercontinete Porque África se esta dividiendo en 2 Está el model 2
Likes Si es realidad
👇
La grieta del este de áfrica es poco probable que se divida el continente por le mitad, porque los grietas próximas están creciendo más rapido. Probablemente se dejará de creciendo en lugar de formar un nuevo océano.
pangea proxima:brazil is landlocked even india even some seas are dried there is also a big lake
i will call the east african island/continent megagascar
In novopangea, the somalian plate should be moved to india in 50 million years
Too fast.
Mexico in supercontinent future
Um actually ma stands for million years ago so u are actually doing past supercontinents
Me gusta el modelo de pangea ultima porque
Africa se puede unir con eurasia formando afre-eurasia y tambien australia se puede unir con la parte de Indonesia y Malasia
Formando austro-afre-eurasia
Y América del norte puede colisonar con rusia.
Your Amazia Is Better Than The Others Its Like A New Amazia
Pause novopangea at the first second u see the Continents north and south America they're Supposed to be connected
I love how the UK is still in Brexit millions of years from now
Philippines in Australia?
My favorite amasia
Nach Auricia zu ziehen wäre kraß
Novopangea is the only correct model. As long as the Pacific plate is subducting, the atlantic ocean will not close.
INDONESIA Sandy pratama Retha ❤
Antartica in amasia:🗿
Bro north pole and south pole aren't white not green
NOT THE PHILIPPINES, MY HOMELAND!!!!
Contental drift
0:15
2:30
The only way to come out of a novopangea is you go to the boot
Look at south New Zealand
1:08 WHY THE HELL IS NEW ZEALAND THERE IN S.A-
Amasia is moving second 0re week in +12 ma
I love how the philippines is just inside Australia everytime XD
“These supercontinents are predicted to be formed with the next 200-250 years”…….oops sorry I mean 200-250 million years. 🤣
Outros supercontinentes: Normal
Aurica: A Pangeia voltou !!!!
Horário
|
V
2:30
Aurica pangea: aisa broke 2:06
Name?
GPlates
The zealandia is continent but under the water
btw it's Pangaea not Pangea
@@redryker3292 Both spellings are correct
shut up
that's not true the official spelling is Pangaea btw
1:05 bruh (it’s hard to explain what I’m thinking about) Edit: you can tell in the comments if you know or about ur opinion
Novopangea is cracked lake in Africa what? 😂
ILIKE PANGEA PROXIMA
el coñtinente del pangea era un supercoñtinente.
😮😮😮😮siiiiiiiiii😅😊
Mio aurica
INDONESIA P sandy arul dion Freedom
Amasia only asia didn't fromed
what about afro-australia?