I just don't know why people dislike the video I mean there is nothing like we should dislike it ......and these video really helps students of architecture it give us whole new perspective ...and lots of love to Mariana mam and rishab bhaiya ❤
If u look to a Palladian design in that context the Poche Wall was the main element subdividing basically "rooms", the transition to early 20th design (thx to abstract painting) deconstructed the Poche Wall and transformed room to "spaces" something already Mies showed in Fansworth's house, I'm more interested in the Phenomenological approach but Heidegger is still quite miss-understood @ Architectural schools.
This video is both helpful and informative but hold on a moment! As a retired architect who has hired and fired a lot of architects in my career everything isn't all about flashy look-at-me presentations and dystopian design solutions. Unfortunately the discussion doesn't get around to what I think are the more important characteristics of a good portfolio. Frankly I wouldn't spend any time reviewing a design portfolio that didn't talk about the project concept or process leading to a design solution. Flashy graphics and wiz-bang designs are not what I would necessarily be looking for in a portfolio. Having an understanding of the design process (program) and a basic idea of the technical issues involved are much more important. And the hip design 'jargon' is a really big turn-off at an interview. It makes a candidate look like they're immature which I guess they are. Plain speaking is the best and keep it short! Architecture is a serious business and requires a lot of thoughtful thinking and hard work. Experienced architects can immediately identify a 'snow-job' when they see and hear it. Every project doesn't come along with an unlimited budget and a client willing to foot the bill for whatever the architect comes up with - ie. 'Fluid Architecture'. Most architects have to work within tight project budgets leaving very little room for some sort of creativity. One last thing is being good looking, having an expensive education, well traveled, speaking well, and working for a Stararchitect doesn't hurt either! It's important to also keep in mind that most young architects just starting out will spend many long hours in the offcie working out someone elses 'design'. Their contribution to whatever they're assign to work on will be minimal at best. Worth remembering it's 10% for design and 90% for construction documents and specifications.
Thank you for this video, along with all of your others! Makes me feel more confident in the path I have taken, in terms of design & fluidity. She’s brilliant! Do you take Cryptos?
Sir please let us know how we can get such course of fluid architecture in India .even when we can get it.. I mean after B arch can we study fluid architecture of not ... Please make a broad video
The concept of fluidity is not necessarily about form. It is similar to the concept of the organic, which is about functionality anf adjacency control merging with circilation. Not a new thing. As a Pratt graduate, heard and saw many ways of looking at this as well as negating this, but it is something not pragmatic or at least it is supposed to result as an architectural experience. Every building is different and if therr is someone good at this and still around is Mr. Renzo Piano. Good video anyway, look at Frank Lloyd Wright for example; in no way i am saying I am old school, but one does not have to fall in love with form to understand this. Thanks !
Hi Davide, thats the first part of the video, made to the teaser as well :) It is not about form, it is the experience of the space, that is the main message
@@marianacabugueiracustodiod9548 I appreciate that you provide your insight through this video and ZI actually think this channel is a good way to speak up as you are doing it. My comment is mainly targeted at various viewers who might think this is strictly about form to the point that they ask about the software and how t make it happen. in my opinion, software is just the tool to bring things into perspective and perhaps accuracy, but the core idea as you point out, is the process behind the experience inside these spaces. good work , by the way! Congratulations!
This is amazing. Thank you so much for hosting this. I learn so much from these discussions!!!
I am so glad 😀
Soo articulate! she explained her experiences and concept so well
🙂
Yayyy finally! I was waiting for this video!
:)
Thankyou so much for this video!! wish there was a discussion on the materials used on this too.
You guys rocks! Great to see this cool collaborations
Hey Max! thanks 🙂
I just don't know why people dislike the video I mean there is nothing like we should dislike it ......and these video really helps students of architecture it give us whole new perspective ...and lots of love to Mariana mam and rishab bhaiya ❤
Thanks a lot for the video.......very much amazed on discovering various fluid architecture projects
🤍
If u look to a Palladian design in that context the Poche Wall was the main element subdividing basically "rooms", the transition to early 20th design (thx to abstract painting) deconstructed the Poche Wall and transformed room to "spaces" something already Mies showed in Fansworth's house, I'm more interested in the Phenomenological approach but Heidegger is still quite miss-understood @ Architectural schools.
Is there any videos for beginners in fluidity in architecture and conceptual ideas and for paramteric
Keep motivating
This video is both helpful and informative but hold on a moment! As a retired architect who has hired and fired a lot of architects in my career everything isn't all about flashy look-at-me presentations and dystopian design solutions. Unfortunately the discussion doesn't get around to what I think are the more important characteristics of a good portfolio. Frankly I wouldn't spend any time reviewing a design portfolio that didn't talk about the project concept or process leading to a design solution. Flashy graphics and wiz-bang designs are not what I would necessarily be looking for in a portfolio. Having an understanding of the design process (program) and a basic idea of the technical issues involved are much more important. And the hip design 'jargon' is a really big turn-off at an interview. It makes a candidate look like they're immature which I guess they are. Plain speaking is the best and keep it short!
Architecture is a serious business and requires a lot of thoughtful thinking and hard work. Experienced architects can immediately identify a 'snow-job' when they see and hear it. Every project doesn't come along with an unlimited budget and a client willing to foot the bill for whatever the architect comes up with - ie. 'Fluid Architecture'. Most architects have to work within tight project budgets leaving very little room for some sort of creativity. One last thing is being good looking, having an expensive education, well traveled, speaking well, and working for a Stararchitect doesn't hurt either!
It's important to also keep in mind that most young architects just starting out will spend many long hours in the offcie working out someone elses 'design'. Their contribution to whatever they're assign to work on will be minimal at best. Worth remembering it's 10% for design and 90% for construction documents and specifications.
Thank you for this video, along with all of your others! Makes me feel more confident in the path I have taken, in terms of design & fluidity. She’s brilliant! Do you take Cryptos?
Thank you Gabriel. Happy to read this :)
Your works adapted from Zaha Hadid! 🙂🙂
Sir please let us know how we can get such course of fluid architecture in India .even when we can get it.. I mean after B arch can we study fluid architecture of not ... Please make a broad video
The concept of fluidity is not necessarily about form. It is similar to the concept of the organic, which is about functionality anf adjacency control merging with circilation. Not a new thing. As a Pratt graduate, heard and saw many ways of looking at this as well as negating this, but it is something not pragmatic or at least it is supposed to result as an architectural experience. Every building is different and if therr is someone good at this and still around is Mr. Renzo Piano. Good video anyway, look at Frank Lloyd Wright for example; in no way i am saying I am old school, but one does not have to fall in love with form to understand this. Thanks !
Hi Davide, thats the first part of the video, made to the teaser as well :) It is not about form, it is the experience of the space, that is the main message
@@marianacabugueiracustodiod9548 I appreciate that you provide your insight through this video and ZI actually think this channel is a good way to speak up as you are doing it. My comment is mainly targeted at various viewers who might think this is strictly about form to the point that they ask about the software and how t make it happen. in my opinion, software is just the tool to bring things into perspective and perhaps accuracy, but the core idea as you point out, is the process behind the experience inside these spaces. good work , by the way! Congratulations!
Mariana is sooo cute 😳😳😳😳😳
✨💫
😁
@@marianacabugueiracustodiod9548 my age is 17 I can here full video??
Indian architects should be learning from Charles Correa . Forget the fluid lark, help the third world ,they don’t need follies