We Put Henry Emily On Trial For His Alleged Crimes!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024
- In today's video, I put Henry Emily from Five Nights at Freddy's on trial for his alleged crimes! We travel across the history and lore of FNAF to try and discover if he is either a Hero or the REAL Villain? Sandwichly versus Nick Carlson Press in the courtroom and YOU can decide in the poll on my community tab! GO CHECK IT OUT!
Voice Actors:
Unknown Caller- @Under_Score
Judge- @lotodots
Alpine- @Alpytek
Nick- @nickcarlsonpress
Edited by- Diego
Script by- Sandwichly
PNG Art by- bbdsocials.car...
#fnafsecuritybreach #fnaf #trending #gaming #fnaftheory
The third and final part of an amazing trilogy
It’s unfortunate that it has to end, but as a different yellow bear says “ don’t be sad it’s gone be happy that it happened.” - Winnie the Poah
😥
That’s from dear jeff
ah yes, my favorite childhood bear, Winnie the Poah.
Dr seuss
Ah, WInnie the Poah, my favorite childhood cartoon. I like the episode when they make fun of the ripoff Winnie the Pooh that was made by the obscure studio Walt Disney Pictures.
Imagine being a judge/prosecutor, and after you sentence William Afton, you call in his partner, Henry Emily, the man whose life and reputation were ruined by Afton afterward.
That's like a grieving father being put on trial RIGHT AFTER his kid's killer was sentenced.
It isn't LIKE a grieving father was put on a trial RIGHT AFTER his kid's killer was sentenced.
It IS a grieving father was put on a trial RIGHT AFTER his kid's killer was sentenced.
7:43 I like the detail that he actively cut out the part, mentioning that Henry “unwillingly” helped create spring trap. I don’t think that single word would give him much of an edge in the court, but the fact it was cut out, really shows how they’re trying to demonize Henry. (legally maybe he deserves it, but thought that was worth noting.)
I think he meant he unwillingly helped Afton to commit his atrocities by enabling and trusting him.
Sandwichly has earned the full contempt of the court and deserves to be federally criminalized
thats propbly where this is heading
As far as the defense goes
1. If he believed afton was dead then you can’t falsely imprison a corpse
2. There are a number of reasons to not actively be following his kid around
3. If he doesn’t know the investigation exists not to mention ongoing, then he’d have no reason to consider anything in the fnaf 6 fire as evidence to begin with
4. afton using his stuff doesn’t reflect on himself, and considering that pizza sim was basically him making the murder weapon(s) unusable then there was at least an attempt to combat afton.
5. But he did burn stuff I guess
Also leaving his daughter to die
@@lazy_guy_2525 not having 24/7 surveillance covers that
He burned his own property, pretty sure that's legal, since the only way it's not allowed is when the intent is committing insurance fraud
and he also made a robot that had the sole purpose of keeping emily in check, which got mysteriously blocked by a box and couldn't save her in time
and designing the place to burn without regard for potential dangers like fire spreading or damaging the environment and space around it shouldn't that still be arson?
1:47 in Henry’s defense, it’s William Afton, he deserved it
Also You both literally burned down establishment and started a fire to they had to put it out to.
Yeah, fair enough
Do you have daddy issues by any chance, Micheal
Matpat pointed out that the amount of force rigged into the hydraulic press of fredbear's mouth was enough to kill a child. According to Mat, this was way above the legal amount of pressure an animatronic can be built with so either Henry neglected the law by doing so or Afton did this behind his back in order to collect more remnant
Also Henry's only real crime is suicide as stated in his speech but then he wouldn't be put on trial in the first place
@@Zinc_Nitrogen Suicide is a crime-?
@@WeebGirl6824
In most countries like America and UK or countries supporting the Catholic Church, This was the case for over 160 years.
Germany was the first country in 1871 to decrimilise it.
The Roman Catholic Church deemed it non-criminal in 1983, and countries followed after that.
However, it’s still criminalized in 20 different countries.
Unlike:
Assisted Suicide : the act of assisting someone for suicide, is still completely illegal in all countries.
@@ClutterzTrice Wtf did they plan to do-? Arrest the corpse T-T?
@@WeebGirl6824 not necessarily. It was more so if they had attempted.
Most often they would be executed.
Suicide was often seen as only active suicide, aka “I’m going to crash my car” “I’m going to jump-“
Not passive suicide such as “I wish a car hits me” “I wish something shoved me off the ledge”
Therefore, they’d execute them thinking that they wouldn’t want it, as they’d only want to die in the hands of themselves, but also suicide couldn’t be labeled as suicide unless the person actively done something to die.
Henry should also be charged with child abuse because if you look at the design for lefty, it contains constant controlled. Shocking to shock Charlotte into submission and not escape. .
So yeah, very abusive to zap your child constantly to the point where lefty is only a very faint voice
Then again, is it legally child abuse? Charlie isn't a physical human anymore.
No. It's not a constant *control shock*, in the blueprint it was strictly described as a "steady voltage". I don't think it's anywhere as powerful and brutal as the electricity shocks we have seen in Sister Location. I think it's more so like a Denki Buro (Japanese electric bath, uses water with an electric current for therapeutic purposes). More in Henry's defense, in FNAF 2 Charlie, when let out of her box, could rush at mach speed to the office to kill the guard, so he had all the reasons for creating something like Lefty. Buut if you're talking more so on the law side of things then it's not really child abuse, given that it has been around 40 years since Charlie died.
@@justagreenpear when you hear a little girl’s voice the puppet and golden Freddy. They clearly haven’t grown up. It’s still child abuse.
And I regardless it’s still designed to hurt her and she has a very soft voice as lefty like she been beaten down
@@aresrivera9744 If anything she sounds like a librarian trying to shush people. Personally I think you should look at it as less of a "Henry tazes his alive daughter" and more of a "Henry tazes a robot his daughter is in control of" in which case she's more so being deactivated by electricity similarly to an EMP bomb, kind of like put to sleep when you stop looking at Lefty as if it's an electric chair. My point is somewhat backed up by the fact Lefty also has a music box inside that is playing like a lullaby, so I think it's clear that Henry's intention is to soothe Charlie instead of shocking her into submission, which is not only needless but also just heavily out of character for Henry with all his flaws
Well it never specified where the "steady voltage" goes but it is listed under the wand dreamer/soother which is made to calm the puppet down just like the music box in fnaf 2 but this time it is powered with electricity so that you wont have to wind it for every 0.02 secs
Gotta love how they didn’t even talk about how the puppet was specifically designed to protect Charlie
(I’m not completely sure if the law justice system would actually accept this but if I’m wrong let me know lol)
I definitely feel like a court would hear the reasoning that Henry built what is basically a robot bodyguard for his daughter, but there's also the fact that said bodyguard can easily be trapped by a box being placed on their own. I think one could argue that this was neglectful of Henry, as it seems like the Puppet was the only thing that could protect Charlie if Henry wasn't present.
Regardless, I doubt Charlie's death counts as neglect anyways. A parent doesn't have to always watch over their child, especially in a place that likely has a handful of parents and employees (in other words, adults that could protect her if something goes wrong) and blaming yourself and feeling guilty for not being able to protect a loved one is not equal to being guilty of neglect.
If you're ever interested in doing another one of these videos, Vanessa could be an interesting candidate. You could argue about the murders of the nine children from the newspaper at the end of Security Breach, and Nick could argue about Vanny. There could be some interesting stuff arguing about Vanessa's responsibilty to turn herself in and/or how much influence Glitchtrap had on her.
Another case that could be explored is adventure Freddy’s case with mass murder off all of the enemies, bosses and potentially most of the playable characters
She’s possessed she couldn’t control herself even if she tried
@@lukeasselmeier I agree, but if Sandwichly argued that Henry was guilty for Williams actions, I could see him arguing that Vanessa is guilty for Vannys actions.
This is also assuming the fire escape ending doesn't mean that Vanny and Vanessa are two different entities.
(Side note this if we’re counting world as its own story including the simulator variant based on it)
You got a bit of information wrong, she was kicked out by bullies and the puppet (The security puppet designed to protect her) was trapped. The puppet was designed to not let her out, keeping her safe in the pizzeria, he tried to keep her safe with the security puppet when he was not there.
Idk about legal stuff, this is just my findings, but I think that he shouldn't be prosecuted for this charge.
I remember game theory did an episode on how the bite of 83 had far too much force in the jaws of the animatronic/springlock suit for it to be safe, and springlocks in general are ridiculous, so I’m surprised those weren’t mentioned
I REALLY considered mentioning the Bite of 83, but the classic counter would just be, "Don't stick a kid's head into the mouth." Good point and comment tho
I believe Henry and William designed two different springlock suit types and that was of Williams design
@@Sandwichlyit’s possible that that mega bite would fall under mikes case for obvious reasons
Yes but it wasn't designed for ppls heads to go in their jaws. They are however meant to go into the skull area but nothing is in danger of getting stuck in its mouth
8:36 Actually it would be the courts responsibility to do something but with prior court records William wasn’t even a suspect in Charlie Emily death and the court dismissed him in the case of the first missing children case
Only one problem remains:
Who is the new CEO of Fazbear Entertainment? Since, as I said a while ago, it’s been under new management and ended up creating the Mega Pizzaplex, books, and games long after the founders probably retired. The company is pretty much on its own now, so what if we sued them?
We can also sue ‘em since they put some kind of illusion disc in Sandwichly’s brain.. somehow.
still afton owned this time by the only afton we dont see
Could be:
Phone guy ( we all thought that Henry died but he was alive so phone guy could have faked his death )
Crying Child ( not likely )
William Afton ( not likely )
Afton's or Henry's unknown relative ( Maybe the company would go to them if Henry got inprisoned )
The reason I think it wouldn't be William is because Sandwitchly would be kinda stressed/angry in his trial ( it's the man that pretty much prevented him from sleeping ) and he isn't.
You could say that he prevented his emotions from surfacing, but he has very severe insomia caused by someone ( William in this case ) so that isn't likely.
And the Man Behind the Phone has a different voice from Afton.
@@AH-64EApacheGuardianHelicopter aftons wife
@@AH-64EApacheGuardianHelicopter afton's wife
the assets would go to her since both owners are dead and she's the only one with that level of ties
He should have argued that Henry killed mike. Henry didn’t ask Mike if he wanted to stay, he just assumed he did and locked him in
Exactly. He also didn't tell Michael about where the exit was
I understand Willaim being put on trial. But then MICHEAL? AND NOW HENRY? If i could take you to court i would. (All jokes aside great video)
Next should be Charlie or Cassidy
@@jediapc226imagine Evan on trial
@@jediapc226It would be interesting to ser how they would handle Cassidy's imprisionment and torture of William. It is definitely illegal and wrong, no matter how bad William js, but she is a frustrated child. It'd be a good discussion
Another banger for sure! Thank you for the opportunity to voice the judge, great work all around!
Here’s something… if we consider this his death because of the spring lock suit… Consider being sealed behind a wall NOT imprisonment or attempted murder but rather concealing evidence connected to a serial kidnapping spree.
Surprised Sammy wasn't brought up in child neglect
For this video, I only did video game Henry.
@@SandwichlyWAS THAT SAMMY EMILY WHO YOU TALKING WITH ON YOUR PHONE!?!?!?
God, I hate how the community always picks not guilty like Henry is guilty from my knowledge
Henry should be charged for creating a machine that resulted in the death of Williams son, and didn't seemed to care about the potential danger it would've led to that bite.
I mean.. he had a responsibility to add a warning sign maybe,
But it's not exactly an elevator makers fault and 13 14 year old pumps shuves a 5 year olds kids head into an elevator wanted to watch them scrm and then they die
MAYBE AFTER WILLIAM KILLED CHARLOTTE ON "THAT NIGHT" THAT HENRY GRIEVED ABOUT HER DEATH SO MUCH THAT HE DIDN'T PROPERLY CHECKED THE PRESSURE OF THE HYDRONICS THAT WAS IN FREDBEAR'S MOUTH AND SO...
MARKIPLIER: WAS THAT THE BITE OF 87- OH WAIT, I MEAN, WAS THAT THE BITE OF 83!?!?!?
You forget that lefte, the bear designed to trap his daughter is designed to give CONTROLLED SHOCKS. I’m no expert on law but that HAS to be torture
Well she wasn't human at the but a soul with don't count souls as part of the law because we can't prove it exist
You see the "steady voltage" isnt really specified where it goes but it is listed in the dream wand/soother which is a mic that is made to sooth the puppet just like the music box in fnaf 2 but this time instead of winding it for every 0.02 secs for your dear life it is powered with electricity
I thought william was the animatronic expert, y'know with afton robotics
Afton Robotics was the Sister Location animatronics
Henry wasn’t aware of William’s doings at the time, it was only in hindsight had he realised what William had done.
Also, William didn’t die in 1993, as the restaurant was still open and the building was still in-tact. By the time we see William dismantling the animatronics in the FNaF 3 minigames, the building is dilapidated, water is leaking in through holes in the ceiling, the place is a complete mess.
If William had dismantled the animatronics in 1993, whilst the Pizzeria was still open, someone would’ve noticed.
Dont forget he also murderd mike in the fire without teling him the way out if he did want to leave
And Charlie his kid to also he made Lefty to trap puppet. Well Henry felt like Michael wanted to stay and die with his siblings in the fire Henry all of this ends for all of us they has the fire to free the souls
to Michael Afton literally a rotting corpse I mean he can't even eat so cuz no organs and all what kind of life would that be?
How tf did Michael and Henry commit more crimes than william
Thank you for an amazing opportunity ❤
Honestly you could technically charge him for hiding evidence too considering he not only hid the murders but after knowing who did it he did nothing about it hell he even technically made one last ditch effort to hide the truth
You know I have a theory that this trial series is actually the afterlife where soul get judged for their actions so @sandwichly want to make this canon
We Put Sandwhichly Wand On Trial For His Crimes!
Crime that he currently broke: Existing
Leaving a robot in charge of his 3 year old daughter? Yea, I'd say he's guilty for neglect
but the robot was to act as a security guard, not to take care of his daughter
and it was williams idea
Thanks again for the opportunity to voice Henry!!
Amazing video!
wouldnt henry also have a murder or neglicence charge for making THE SPRINGLOCK SUITS
Jesus christ did NOBODY die in that fire!?
Henry:connection terminated, you mfs you can't jail me because I burnt everyone including myself (*spirt runs away*)
"Mr. Emily ran away and deserted them."
Why do I feel like a rickroll comment is gonna be caused by this
Don't forget about child negligence and child endangerment.
you should do these videos for other characters as well. Like characters from other franchises, these are amazing.
2:01 That actually doesn't work with FNAF 3's case because Phone Guy dies when FNAF 1 takes place, so he can't talk about locking Springtrap in the saferoom when he's dead by that time. Plus, Phone Dude says that those are voice records from the very old locations. I've also just checked the phone calls in FNAF 3 and I can say without a doubt that he's talking about how they "sealed off the saferooms at most locations due to federal restrictions". It wasn't the decision of the company whatsoever. They were *_forced_* to obey the rules. And they did this probably because of the reality that those murders were committed inside the saferooms. They wouldn't want to keep the saferooms open and risk a public sanction.
Yeah, you submitted the arson charge wrong. Since Henry did not start the fire himself but rather orchestrated it he can't be charged with arson but rather conspiracy to commit arson. Also I don't think the statute of limitation defense is valid since the charge involves imprisonment which had not ended until that year meaning that that's when the expiration period on the statute began.
Saying you're sorry something happened to someone doesn't make you liable for it happening to them
Yo Sandwichly, are you okay? You were blabbing a ton of stuff about Henry Emily committing crimes, doing your usual court stuff, after you passed out. You do realize Henry Emily died in the fire. Are you okay?
12:12 technically he won't have known the investigation was still going on cuz it had been years since the deaths and he probably thought that the investigation at fully ended
Henry Emily was doing them a favor. He wanted to destroy the animatronics cause he knew they would destroy many lives Michael aft on was already dead he’s a zombie basically not murder he didn’t mean for his child to die He was a coward. But he did try to set stuff right
i have multiple problems 1. henry killed himself 2. he couldnt save the children which is why he listened to kys 3. the lore is getting so contradicted every matpat in a 50 mile area is having a heart attack
This is like a phoenix wright video 😂
The money printer prints what the money printer prints.
I DIDN"T SEE THIS! THANK YOU SO MUCH!
@@Sandwichly No problem!
Bro what ur doing is illegal XDD
you forget murder he killed them even if they are ded alr
Dude Henry found out in when the fire came in fazbear frights bro didn’t know until fnaf 3
And I thought Henry was the good guy 💀
My guy he was never a good person he's obviously better than William but still a bad person
@@Remisaku how is he bad?
Welp this gonna be interesting
7:17 Hello oh dear Bonnie render of mine :)
I find it so cool that you have multiple people helping you and you're pretty underrated! Just subscribed.
GUILTY !!!
williams body was in scraptrap when henry burned it down, more disposing of evidence
Hmm unfortunately sandwich I must ask you do you see prosecuting someone for one’s own gain as being legal? Weather or not you see it as that you can’t deny using Mr Emily and micheal afton to get to him just so you can get henry in jail for your gain is worthy of being charged or a case to be made so I must the people this, is Mr sandwich to be put on trial and if so please spread the word so it can be possible
For My Own Gain!?! Ummm... I would never!
i mean henry did a lot of crimes, but we can all agree that without him
the events of pizzeria won't happen which will make william and elizabeth kill a lot of people
I thought that the only part of the fnaf 6 pizza only burned in the office-ish
I feel bad for Charlie, basically got murdered, and presumably her soul got stuck in a security puppet?
I saying that Henry is not guilty because Willam was hiding his clues of him attacking other kids but when he finds out he was working on plan to stop him or even call police on him but didn't have any proof only for Willam to get spring locked, how ever......in FNAF wolf game we can see pixel version of Henry saying how he helped Willam with out knowing to creat circus baby before Willam used her maybe years later..
According to my research the concealment of a body is a crime
So in other words upon noticing William's death and "ultimate" demise to the springlock suit his immediate reaction should have been calling the local authorities
So he could/should be charged for the following:
Failure to report a corpse.
Hiding a corpse.
Abuse of a corpse.
Unlawful disposal of a corpse.
Unproper burial and/or prevention of burial.
Henry Emily might as well just be charged with murder by this point.
And that's discounting the contruction workers hiding the safe room, that would add a conspiracy charge on top of all that, the constructions worker would problably also be chargd as accomplices of the previously listed crimes.
That is not accounting for the fact that they(each individual charge) could be charge in unison or separately
But in the detail the main things woul be
Not reporting someone's body/corpse to the police is a crime, by hiding William's corpse Henry Emily leaves himself open to the following charges:
Abuse or desecration of a dead human body
Failure to report the finding of a dead human body to a local law enforcement agency
Hiding someone's corpse and preventing someone's burial is also a crime but I didn't find anything that said if it would be chraged separately or lumped into the first one
I also found Unlawful disposal of a corpse/cadaver but again I don't know if it would be charged separated from the first one or again be lumped togheter in the first one.
According to Utah laws.
I'm not qualified to do a video on law, but I am so happy someome finally took it upon themselves to delve into the law of FNaF. It has plagued my mind for years, and with my search history likely has me on multiple search lists.
The MCI is especially interesting, as according to FNaF AR William was never charged with anything- he must have somehow provided an airtight false alibi- but the newspapers in FNaF 1 also supply that someone *was* convicted. Who was the scapegoat? Of what?
Maybe a no name employee we saw Purple Guy suit up in 4? Maybe he had an unwitting accomplice. Maybe he had multiple on the payroll that didn't know exactly what they were covering for- Phone Guy included. SL kinda backs this up.
But I personally assume Henry got charged with a count of neglectful homicide for each child- so 5 or 6 kids depending on whether you include CC or Charlie (I would include the crying child but not Charlie but I'm no expert, I assume Cassidy was never reported and thusly so vengeful).
5 years each is 25-30 years, which takes Henry out of the picture from ~1985 to 2015. Hmmm....
Would love to see mr.david banner on trial (from the hulk 2003)
Ah yes no one can break a swear on the silver eyes
I'm by the point where Henry destroyed William Afton he was already dead many years after the murders
Henry was the one who allowed michale to burn the building faz bear’s fright
I'm guilty that i didn't find your channel earlier! ( Please don't sue me )
My lawyers are on their way
@@Sandwichly WAIT I CAN EXPLAIN- ITS THE TH-cam ALGORITHM!!! ( But seriously, i love this series! The Lore is very interesting, I can't wait for the next episode! )
Vanessa should be put on trial lol
I thought false impressionment would be trapping the puppet in Lefy
The end of this video seems like the end of a story from the books
1. Afton was dead so yeah no charge
2. Charlie was locked outside by bulling kids while Henry was likely working.
3. There would have needed to actually be an investigation. Additionally the remains of the funtime animatronics to our knowledge no longer kept any actual evidence of their crimes in their new builds. The blueprints at the location also seem to have been digital copiea not the originals.
4. The equipment was not used by the client to commit any crimes.
5. The fire did not burn down the location. It was the equivalent of decomissioning and recylcing scrap from faulty products.
6. Henry learned of the situation with posession long after the events occured.
Henry should have been watching his child to had someone watch her baby sit her.
@rad1165 Henry had her at a location where children are normally safe. She had a security bracelet on, and the puppet was specifically designed to either keep her safe or keep the children in the location where they would be safe.
@@RFDN0 oh okay thanks for information 🙃
Child abuse should also be added as he built an animatronic that would trap his daughter force her into a submissive state and then put her to sleep and shock her on repeat
She was a killer Animatronic I don't talking would have done anything
@@Unhappyicecake she has been shown to be the most sentient of all the animatronics and based on sister location shocking animatronics will just make them more aggressive
@EvangelicaVT and how was Henry supposed to know please do tell me. Also The Animatronics has been shown to attack anyone. They perceive as a threat
i dont think he knew that it was his daughter until after he trapped her and he didnt design a way to let her out
@@Dingusdongusok if he didn’t know, why would he capture it?
9:18 and also William’s son, the crying child
Let my man Henry go he ain’t done nothing wrong
I would more believed the others kid lock her out.
Lol you should be a lawyer
Vanessa should be next
12:34 that went badly for sandwich
0:03 I saw that. I think you need to be trialled now, Sandwichly.
Henry didn’t try to stop William? Bro suspected him the whole time but had 0 evidence that he did the crime. Also “Selfish actions” who knew that wanting to stop murderous animatronics from roaming Utah was selfish
Every FNAF characters Henry missing children William Michael Vanessa Elizabeth ect they're not all perfect they're all bad in their own they're all Not innocent they all done some crimes they all done all bad things and sins evil killer murder insane pycho killer ghost robot animatronic vengeful spirit and all.
Henry and William should have really took action and stop the incident with Crying child afton they should have went up there and stop them but they didn't. William Henry both probably shouted at them to stay away that it was dangerous what they were doing but Michael and his friends they didn't listen and Michael and his friends disobeyed his father Henry when he told them not to go near the animatronics that it is was dangerous and he they should have added a sign that says it's dangerous to go near the animatronics robot.
But William and Henry didn't know that someone would shove their own brother in fredbear's mouth that's dangerous
Michael Afton should have known better he killed his own brother on his birthday that's Still a sin murder. I know it was an accident but Michael is the cause of his own brother's death which is bad
Michael kill crying child Afton on his birthday and Michael Afton killed crying child his brother as a joke prank that went too far and it was not funny it bad Michael Afton has to live with that for the rest of his life knowing that he's the cause of his own brother's death him and his friends to.
Literally all of them have committed murder at least once nobody in the fnaf universe is innocent
@@therandomcommenter6629
Yeah no one is innocent in the FNAF universe.
False imprisonment ? He had a hunch william afton was behind the murders and the police couldn't find any clues connecting him to the murders even though things like his DNA were obv on the spring bonnie suit. Henry saw William dying and that confirmed that his hunch of William being behind the murders were 100% true. He also didn't want to story to get out because if it did that the co owner of the company was behind the murders and disappearances of so many children his company and even his own name would be done. He did the right thing imo. Police couldn't do their job right and his hunch was right.
The child neglect thing also wasn't his fault, his daughter just wasn't in his view and unfortunately it lead to her being murdered. It happens to a lot of parents, we are adults and we work. We want our kids with us under supervision 24-7 but realistically that's impossible. So yeah she got locked out and killed which is tragic but he can't be to blame for that.
Let's gooo, another peak video!
THE LOREEEEE!!!
Yes
8:22 That doesn't work since William Afton is the owner, which is idiotic of the owner killing his target customers. Unless he paid the police and concerned parents since he's a wealthy businessman in the small-town of Hurricane, Utah. In Pizza Simulator, Emily didn't even know who's in the room.
I acually feel really bad for sandwichly he never asked for the illusion discs and whas told theyd get removed
since mr.emily made the animatronics right.... does that mean that he made an animatronic that can bite a Childs frontal lobe which is a hazard?
I find Henry innocent
He has one of the risks that makes you see crazy s***
I like how this video is longer than the crimes afton did video.
Slovakian Henry is something I didn't know we needed
Isnt it illegal to not report somone to the police if they see someone comiiting a crime? In this case, murder. He knew what William was doing. So he couldve reported william to the police. Or am i just being stupid
Writing notes*
William was seen on cams by Henry himself
how does this take place after fnaf 6? Henry, William, and Michael are all dead after that.
Surely vigilanteism as well
There is a problem with the finding out of the murders. This happened in the 90's, after the children died. Henry saw the bodies inside of the broken animatronics, found William and inferred he was the killer. Innocent
Yeah because William was the spring Bonnie going on a mci spree*