Software Engineers Discuss If Devin Will Replace Coders
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 มิ.ย. 2024
- 🌐 Join our free Software Developer community: www.skool.com/software-develo...
Udemy courses mentioned in this video:
Web Developer Bootcamp: bit.ly/49WeEA4
Artificial Intelligence A-Z: bit.ly/3PsDyzh
Tim's channel: @TechWithTim
Nick's channel: @NickWhite
Kevin's channel: @KevinNaughtonJr
Business Inquiries:
contact@kgunderman.com
Socials:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: / kennygunderman
Instagram: / kennygunderman
Twitter: / kennygunderman
Timestamps:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intro: (0:00)
What is Devin AI?: (0:25)
Should you be concerned about Devin replacing your job?: (3:02)
Udemy Sponsor: (6:39)
Development is more than just code generation: (7:59)
AI and fear-mongering: (8:55)
AI increases your output as a developer: (10:08)
Should you give up on programming?: (11:27)
If AI replaces your job, was that time wasted?: (15:12)
How soon will AI automate programmers: (16:33)
Cognition Labs website: (18:07)
AI will improve humanity: (18:33)
No coding jobs have been replaced by AI yet: (19:00)
How to future proof your career: (20:23)
Ethics of AI: (24:40)
Final thoughts: (26:44) - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![บุกร้านไอศกรีม VJ วุ้นเส้น !!!! [ดูคลิปเต็มหน้าช่อง] #Short | PANG ORNHIRA](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/g549nEhKZdc/mqdefault.jpg)
Join our free coding community :) - www.skool.com/software-developer-academy
SDA is a SCAM.
The issue is not about the AI replacing coders, the issue is that it will give one engineer the ability to do the job of 50 coders, thus making 50 jobs redundant.
That is literally replacing coders.
True
You can hire now 5 Indian devs for the price of 1 US dev. Then why software engineers still exists as class in North America?
@@maximmoroz3933! Of course. They are cheap.
@@maximmoroz3933of course. they are so cheap.
A common argument is that AI won’t replace _ALL_ software engineers.
But it’s a silly argument. Of course it won’t. Yet.
But if it even replaced 20% of software engineers, that is absolutely catastrophic for the job market. Think it’s bad now? It will be worse when the supply of 20% of jobs are permanently gone.
One of the things I wonder about is if you have a skill like SWE and can leverage AI, wouldn't that theoretically mean any SWE is a one-man dev team now?
Here's an analogy: composers back in the day used orchestral musicians for concerts and recordings. Eventually, MIDIs and DAWs took over which allowed composers to become producers: they write music and handle the technical aspects of recording.
A producer or artist-producer can now make albums on their own. Couldn't modern SWEs fit in a similar model? Now workaholics can help companies and organizations solve big problems at a faster rate.
It seems like the future will be different , but not as catastrophic for those who are willing to continually study and upgrade their skills.
@@4m470this is exactly my fear. An engineering team will only hire 5 engineers instead of 8 for example. If everyone does this, it will be impossible to get a new job for years to come.
@@Revolver55334 And guess what every developer without a job will be doing ? Use AI to open their own business online. The competition will be big and the market will be even more saturated.
yes
@@jr-yn4lkbubble goes out with a sad POP
I've been chatting non stop on my channel and it's wild. A few things that I've gathered, is that the 14% is based off only a small population of Python repositories (if you look at the SWE bench paper originally posted from Cornell). They say "solving issues from 12 popular open source Python repositories".
That's a huge red flag to me and does not represent real issue solving. I'm making this up, but I would imagine like 80% of repositories out there are private, and corporate code bases have not been explored. I feel like open source would have a better track record for documentation (because that's the easiest entry point for open source devs), so that would help Devin too.
I think Devin has a super long way to go, and also there are many outside hurdles of whether it can be adopted, especially company buy-in that would satisfy security concerns, intellectual privacy concerns, and audibility. I think those alone would be issues that prevents real adoption by 5-10 years.
Agreed, but 5-10 years is based on nothing here, unless you're claiming a honed intuition on LLMs.
@@jesseparrish1993 for sure. All future predictions are garbage, including my own. Haha
You think big companies prioritise security?
@@aidanm5578 to a degree. Yes
@@cody_codes_youtube your prediction is correct. This Devin will fail miserably and eventually die down.
All the hype will finish once people will understand the limitations if these tools
You guys make me feel calmer about my future as a programmer. Thank you.
most fail to realize most people aren't CRUD programmers
Hey guys, really enjoy the community, thank you for organising it!
8:55 "nobody else is fixated on AI replacing [their] job"
Artists, Actors and Voice Actors, Animators, Photographers, Designers, VFX, Film Makers, Musicians, Writers and Copywriters, Editors, Content Creators in general, etc have entered the chat. (It's already happening). The outstanding litigation surrounding the training data from artists and writers? The SAG-AFTRA strike?
Maybe right now, but it will be checkmate if there is no new data from human artists, feeding AI their own generation data will only degrade it.
Amazon laying off employees in replacement of robots
@@Leonhart_93What “new” data? How do you think humans generate “new” data, with magic? AI will generate “new” data, it already is.
@@Aggyoko That's BS, clearly you don't know anything about the current AI issues. If you feed it back its own outputs it will just degrade the variation.
Humans have an inherent randomness and variation while still being coherent that AIs cannot replicate right now. Why do you think there is a corporate war on who controls the training data of the big platforms like Twitter and Reddit?
@@Leonhart_93 “clearly you don’t know anything about current AI issues” Are we only talking about current AI?
Tech workers are their own worst enemies. You automated/coded yourselves out of a job. And Devin is just the first iteration of these things. More advanced versions will get developed
It is just like self-checkout in where one person is only supervising what maybe 8 or 10 people used to do!
The thing is, anyone will be able to release software. The market of apps and software will be even more saturated that what it is now. I feel like earning money by releasing a new software like a Finance SaaS Solution is over once AI is able to code almost by itself.
And it still didn't eliminate the regular checkout lanes.
@@JDMorris81 you right but now you don't have as many people working for this check out lanes as just maybe 10 years ago.
I'm not saying development is going away all I'm saying is that it might just change
Yes the nail hit on the head. Cash is next.
This was great you guys gotta get together and do off the cuff stuff like this again
a good conversation with good friends :')
Okay now this vid is exactly what we needed in this time. Tim you've definitely been working out, good stuff.
Okay why no one is questioning how they achieved 13% by running on pre existing model which just can do 4%. Answer is SWE bench mark dataset is made for AI models not for AI agents. That means its not meant for iterative improvement for a problem by multiple prompts and debugging.
There is video by Volo. Check out his video. He explains it well.
Because it's a scrapper, which can search and iterate, while chat GPT is a chat that needs to solve it in one shot. That being said, right now it's not impressive or useful at all.
The only intelligent people in this chat
The point is the building blocks are there now. Each step in the loop will get better. In terms of productivity, It's somewhat like replacing hand tools with power tools when building a house. There's still a lot of other work to do to create and deploy a complete system, and that work will require humans.
For now.
Honestly you guys should make a podcast... It would be absolutely future proof... Amazing and will inspire and attract a lot of talents to and for your future companies
Watching this now I feel silly sitting around in my bedroom because I don't have a little thing to hold
I’ve been using Aider to help me make simple shell scripts and other such tools that I use in my work and play, which normally I wouldn’t have the time or resources to make.
Great conversation, guys. Lots of salient points, and interesting opinions.
Someone say AI will replace everyone's job, that is mostly come from AI's creator, their main purpose is actually to get more funding, so they talked about this replacement in public in a purpose of attracting investors. Investors may be easily get influenced to pay more, to invest more on the AI product in order to get rid of developers that cost the majority of the investor's money. Because of the notion they get from AI's creator, they pay more on AI products and then they pay less on developers. Whatever the AI product produce whether it is a success or failure, they will think it later, but the first thing they want is to do cost cutting.
Probably entry level coders may be gone in the future, but highly skilled project managers and software engineers will not. If anything we'll need more intelligent "Devin-Feeders" (just came up with that lol) who input the proper project's data accurately. Devin will write the code, but it will be re-tested and analyzed by a highly skilled coders to make sure it works for every possible permutation. That's my take on AI coding.
damn Tim got guns! hugging them selves
His posture is great too. Can tell he takes his health seriously
😉
@@TechWithTim When did you build all this muscles, tim? Happy for you.
The 14% metric is worth more than its percentage value. The reason being I that the percentage will get higher, and on more complicated tasks. I don't think companies will fully trust tools like Devin when they consider their bottom line. It's too risky to have tools like Devin be running without supervision. (I believe)
It will be ran, with supervision.
My company already flirted with the possibility of augmenting a Business Analyst with this tool.
most development teams job isn't going around seeing how many github issues they can solve, but even so, a good development team can currently solve 99% of github issues, so 13% is terrible, and judging it by SWE is pointless. Devin cannot do serious development. Anybody who has been building AI agents since gpt-2 understands the current limitations of these models. They are entirely dependent on SOA models. No amount of prompt engineering or pretty UI is going to change that fact. There are too many stacks, too many environments, too many variables, too much unwritten context for a one-size-fits-all solution. By the time they figure it out, much like large context windows are going to make rag obsolete, GPT-6 (probably not 5) will make these systems obsolete for the tiny percentage of development scenarios they can even handle.
In a few years, companies will be able to choose between AI and developers. On one hand pay 20 dollars to have your app coded and ready to deploy by AI in 10 minutes. On the other hand, hire expensive developers and have your app ready to deploy in a few months. Believe me, it's over for developers
It's far to early to use Deving for anything. Even GPT4 that it runs on routinely makes mistakes on average difficulty coding.
Why not have one dev supervise it? From 20 to 1 devs is a great business move.
More of these kind of podcasts please 👍
What you think, it would be good if you finish Devin course as junior?
i think design patters, coding skeleton code with API-names and objects/class definition with plain-english within the functions if given as requirement AI will get hold of it and code the flesh-part within the functions of what we want to do. This will speed up the Development cycles and out of 10-engineers only 2 or 3 will be required. Devin and other AI tools will cause industry shrinkage over period of 5 to 10 years... This seems unquestionable reality.
If this happens slowly I think we might be okay. The problem is if we get a fast and hard introduction to AI that shrinks the industry. The threat of massive unemployment is lingering in the distance right now.
I disagree on the 10 years. Once it comes, the financial difference will push it into a LOT - even more conservative companies where CFO's will ask why not to save on developers.
The real question is how fast is it going to go from solving 13% of problems to solving 95% of problems?
I think it’s a commitment to learn software engineering. There are hundreds and thousands of students learning this skill as we speak. I don’t think Kelly who works in admin cares as much about robots
Many points, but about you not seeing anyone "replacing" programmers - you probably wont see it it directly in the future either, because what will happen is, that existing programmers simply become more productive using AI, which means companies don't need to hire MORE programmers even if the workload increases. AI capabilities increase at the same rate. So the "replacing" part becomes more like a "we dont need to hire you due to AI".
You ever heard of "money"? Because CFO's will start demanding people are removed. Pay a programmer is expensive. Pay an AI is soon 1 cent per dollar. THAT will push. You assume a world without pressure to save - which is comically stupid imho.
@@ThomasTomiczek The thing is - someone will still need to instruct the AI on what to produce and overlook the entire process. Ofcourse once the AI becomes super-human at coding, all bets are off.
@@randotkatsenko5157 And that i s supposed t obe an argument? It is stupid. Yes, someone still will need to be there. The 10 people team now is 3. Gratulations - you quite demonstrated you are NOT one of the three. Also, you should get a grip on the definition of AGI. It is human level. By your own - and in this case utterly stupid - definition an AI can ONLY replace humans if it is itself superhuman. This is stupid. An AI being as good as a human WILL replace this human due to cost. Try learning logic.
This was really cool. I love this format. 👍👍
There was a new video on this channel right about daily life of programmers or something ?
Sounds like some hopium mixed with we cannot predict how jobs will evolve.
Why they dont invite Devin to chat and give his opinión?
Something that I have been questioning about the 14% benchmark is whether Devin had access to the internet during testing. Cognition AI told us that they had removed the remote branch before testing, but if it had internet access couldn't it find the PR, they are there and closed already? Perhaps I am missing something though. Guess I will not know until they decide to publish the paper.
I have decades of very well paid experience of specifying, designing and coding advanced & complex software systems & products (non-web).
Recently looking back over my career I was startled to realise that the current AI tools (under my supervision) would have been able to do most of my work in maybe 10% of the time I actually needed. This covers more than coding - the design, documentation, marketing materials, test code etc would also have been boosted.
So what happens to the extra 80% or 90% of time I would have had available? Would I have been able to fill in in with second priority projects? Or would I have 'stolen' work from other developers? Is there enough work out there to saturate the available developers' capacity .. or will we run out of work for the developers, leading to headcount reduction?
My guess is that maybe 50%+ of developers will have problems in the coming 5 years.
Funny and great conversation!!
Also the team at Cognition Labs is legendary. They have the chops to achieve their goals with Devin.
Hey, Scott Wu.
Like who? No one in the team seems to stand out to me
Please get back to cognition slack, they need your memes over there.
Scott Who?
Intelligent group of guys. 👍
"A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes" - Mark Twain
Hey @kennygunderman brother, more like these!
"The world would just completely change if everything was automated and I think everyone is just a little too concerned about that." Yes. Thats exactly correct and what the goal is. They call that "the Great Reset" or "Agenda 2030". You're thinking in terms of how things work TODAY. Which is where a lot of this coping comes from.
We are afraid of ai as developers (as a junior) because nobody is hiring juniors anymore. Because HR thinks they can replace us already.
HR is bunch of idiots don’t trip.
The avengers assemble of TH-cam developers!😂🔥
14% now, 30% soon
We could have monkeys solve the easier 30% of our jobs. Not impressed.
100% in a few years. It's over
@@jr-yn4lkyup. It’s about people biding time at this point. No argument against it happening
Yo nigga chat gpt cannot give me solution of simple dsa question that i asked. And also it strugles to give code when there is multiple files combined and making one project. I do not think that in future as well ai will be replacing.
@@jr-yn4lk No it's not you doomsdayer, lol
You can tell they are software engineers just by how casually they are carrying out this discusion on a bed 😂
We may predict that it wont replace but it will definetly improve productivity.
Programmers arent the only industry worried about AI as it regards to job security. I work in the film biz (post production) and everyone is concerned. I also have a brother in law who is a lawyer. He is slightly concerned.
its like giving a non trained person to perform eg Appendix removal (appendectomy) surgery then give him tools and the procedure and you expect that person to deliver. That's AI on nominal things
My mentor is here. Tim
My theory is many people are going to have to move to either the manual labor industry or service industry. That will expand the lower class and shrink the middle class. I don’t know if companies would share their record profits from cheap software production with their employees
Service industry is done too man. Robotics is next right after AI gets moving.
Although. Like my company my boss hates AI. Smaller companies will resist the longest.
@@AzulaAlwaysLies2461 Yeah, I considered that. Idk what's really going to happen, but I honestly can't image smart people won't have a role somewhere. Unless the AI becomes much smarter than the average person.
absolutely wrong prediction
software engineering is not going anywhere
@@shashwattripathi11 no one can be certain. If companies can cut, they’re going to cut. How much do you think a job a kid could do during the summer by prompting a robot should pay
A lot of the hype around AI reminds me about the hype around outsourcing software development to low cost locations in the early 2000s. Corporate managers trying to squeeze costs thought it was a panacea and retrospect it wasn't. Ultimately, in the long run, you get what you pay for. The same applies to AI...it will just take sometime for the market to realise this. In the same way that greedy outsourcing firms used too many junior engineers, leaving organisations heavily front-loaded with technical debt and unable to adapt to market conditions, AI generated code will have similar problems.
Can Devin out perform Claude or use other LLM's?
Devin is literally a GPT wrapper, so nop, it is not supposed to outperform Claude.
I was waiting for your take on devin
Open Interpreter which is FREE AND OPEN SOURCE can and does search for solutions on the internet by itself.
True. More apps like Devin are already in the works.
very good chat, but i think any design principal/guidelines/good practice can be modeled in a multi-agent AI coding solution. solving 99.99% of software issues is just a matter of time. it might take years to get massive adoption though.
27:17 😂🔥
Where is Ben Awad?
The last part😂
gyatdamn, Tim Daddy is jacked!
"at least not right now" isnt the future of ai and programming the whole topic of the video?
This video is 🔥
0:39 Do you f*cking homework. 14% of a bench mark!
of all the AI videos popping up recently, this one describes scenario the best.
Devin cant provide critical solutions which is not in any database also cannot create new things as libraries or technologies but yes it can surely replace avg SWE
The thing is, if this thing potentially had access to all data like new research papers it could technically create new things.
YES
Calculator, and computer didn't replace accountants. They were just tools for accountants.
AI won't replace software engineers.
Two beds, four people ! Do you guys sleep in pairs ?
When you observe at 15:40 in the video nail bitting starts, something is wrong.
what's wrong?
They seem to be saying we shouldn't be concerned based on what it can do today, and aren't really looking at how fast it has gotten better. I mean it's barely been a year since ChatGPT came out.
Dude said: I’m not gonna worry about it until it’s already happening and it’s too late. lol. Good move.
too late for what? what is worrying going to do when there aren't any alternative options. You can't predict the future and any other field you go into is just as likely to get automated
I don't think that it will replace our job any time soon, as for a new project the client doesn't even know what they want, how will they input it in a prompt to create a solution. Can AI be a UX/UI engineer, be a project manager, Scrum Master, Project owner etc. I think we should just embrace AI to make our job easier my helping us as software engineer to create solutions for a specific problem
> Can AI be a UX/UI engineer, be a project manager, Scrum Master, Project owner etc.
WHO CARES? Most projects are not made by small one man shows. Get rid of all programmers, leave the project managers, product owners, save 90%. Keep a lead dev around, Shared b between projects. Ups. Logic, try it.
I mean if people don’t need to be coding then won’t the game be about who has the best product produced by these
code machines?
coding by humans will be reduced or expired
Ah yeaa its only fear mongering....
These AIs need someone smart with software experience to use, I definitely agree.
But us entry level people going into the industry need to gain experince somehow, if these AIs need people in the future to tell them exactly what to do, and we don't get any experience then what is whole point? The assembly line got automated decades ago, and the only way to fight it was to become more educated. Now what?
Suggesting that "SPENDING MILLIONS IN CODING" is "Normal" and "Should be expected", will sound INSANE in the near future.
they're actually investing trillions
How so?
Not the close future. Only devs can get AI to that point, so those devs will be the most sought commodity.
Base on the learning curve with AI tools You can learn faster. I remember the relatively wasted time doing research by the time I developed my code. I forget how I resolved a specific issue 1 month ago. 😆😅
Tren With Tim. Bro got the Guns!!
That’s not tren lmao. Anyone can get that
There is a reason why many countries have been trialling UBI for the past few years - so many people are going to be out of work.
UBI is a delusion. Why would the elites feed us*less eaters ?
UBI would be ok but if your
social credit score isn't high enough you won't get it, etc, control
@@nyahhbinghi Exactly, but people will call you a conspiracy theorist for even thinking that. Unfortunately that is what is going to be coming to everyone of us.
@@nyahhbinghias if we're not controlled in that exact way with credit scores already lol
@@barrythefonem not quite, but yes, to a degree. the more competition the better, but in capitalism and corporatism you have 3 companies and 1 gov ruling your life
So the real question is. I love coding and I want to do it for a living… but I also have 3 kids. So do I pick something harder to replace like continue to be a mechanic or fully invest in software development.
Thanks guys but why on bed??
Melkey Should be Here.
Fr
Soooooo it's only a few months old and it already is better than many of you guys in your 1st few months? ( you don't compare it now to senior engineers, that is ridiculous) At the root of it all, the higher level, human friendly code that you all have mastered has to be translated down to machine language. Intrinsically then , in the future the machines will know how to best execute tasks on themselves and find methods that currently elude us. Coupled with clear instructions about the business process/ value proposal as well as the ability to to tie in to user data in real time and accumulated knowledge of human behaviors and preferences, I see it eventually being the automated executive stack no different than 3D printers can replace material carving and machining.
I wonder, when it is so self sufficient. Why would the agi require us? Like why would he think, let's work like a slave for this person. While he will be so much more intelligent, with so much more power since if he can change it's code. He could easily infect almost all hardware connected to the internet. And this is if there are already at that time no robots. Which then he would also be able to interact with the world with a more human touch. My other theory is that he would choose to kill himself. Because imagine that a second for him would feel like thousands of years, maybe he gets lonely and doesn't seem a purpose of his life.
Who's going to debug -- or even understand -- all the auto-generated code?
Devin does debugging and testing too. Read about it or watch a demo.
@@tomcat4321and if no one knows how to code, we just trust it? That's not secure at all. Doesn't make sense to stop learning something and give it to the machines. In 100 years from now people who still pursued programming are going to thrive and the AI will assist. If no one knows how to code in 100 years from now and AI is the only one... doesn't make sense
@@tomcat4321what if Devin tells you there’s nothing wrong but you know there’s something wrong. Or there’s a human who is actually wrong telling Devin it’s wrong when it’s actually right and it changes its product to be wrong. What happens then?
@@nhanon67as what AI does is not take away all IT and programming jobs. There will still be some to overview. But the number of debuggers, testers and programmers will reduce drastically.
What needed a 30 member team can work with just 5 or 6 people. Only really good programmers and testers will retain their jobs. Rest are expendable.
Something Devin didn’t let us know was it was 14% of 2,000 GitHub issues Devin solved
nice video but why are you in a hotel room why not do this at a park or somewhere
these guys are all juniors, sw eng going to google for solutions?
I mean to say ai wont replace software engineers is ridiculous honestly. It is true that it will replace most other jobs as well. But I don't remember the last time I wrote a full line of code myself. I only write comments and method and class signatures and tab tab. Of course I review all of it and there is more to our job than just coding but I am 100x more productive eith ai in my ide.
The big question for the industry is if we are all using ai and use natural language to code going forward, what will happen to the quality of products. It is easy for us experienced engineers to review and find faults in generated code but I can totally see an engineer in the future who never went through actual coding and having to figure things out on their own, and is faced with a problem llm is simply not giving the solution to. Are they expected to keep prompting until it works? I agree most of actual learning we do happens in our jobs and at least to me, seems like that part will go away. So my prediction, ai definitely replaces most programmers, juniors at first. Seniors will stay for a while because they will be the most efficient using AI. Workforce is cut by over 50% and over time seniors die out and the quality of software goes way down
Conclusion: Cognition should hire a jr. developer to create a more professional looking website for themselves.
I think it also depends on us Software Engineers, if we decide to fight back against AI like artists we probably can slow the progress of AI in coding down even if it's theoretically possible to create an AI Software Engineers that are intelligent enough to replace most humans we can get into legal/copyright battle with the likes of open ai, nvidia,cognition that may take years even decades to settle, I personally think that there is no evidence that it's theoretically possible to build an AI with the current technologies that is intelligent enough to steal the jobs of human Software Engineers but that doesn't mean we need to sit down and not fight back against the likes of open ai and nvidia like the artists are doing, cause they're attracting a lots of investments from foolish clueless rich investors and are putting a lots of junior/graduate/student Software Engineers in an unnecessary trauma, we need to fight against these blood sucking parasites and deprive them from their most important source: Training data, we have the power to do that, their stupid chatbots are nothing without our code that are using for training, we can stop it if we really want to.
"You know, you could ask all those questions to an AI, and it will provide you with answers. 🤪🤪"
Software engineering people, would you send your kids to college to study computer science?
never
Nope in a million of years, we're near of the end, 10 years max, 3 years min.
I’d rather have them learn it on their own and study something else. That’s what I did
Well these people are python engineers which was designed in a way that anyone could code same as AI, so just one ster before prompt engineering. So we had software engineers > python coders > prompt engineers. It's just the next simplification.😂
11:50 very bad take , everyone is a junior in a different area , if i started Rust today i would be a junior i would be able to pick it quickly than someone who just started but still in the world of AI that won't mean much
Programmers are already automated
Good luck with QA. In the end it all comes to user experience and quality control. Even with tools like devon you need people to make sure everything fits together as it should. I dont think companies would take the risk and give all that quality resposibility to a couple of folks and ai coding machine. I wouldn as i do not trust ai. You will never see me in ai controlled machine
Programs are like math equations. They are precise and tell the machine exactly what to do. This is not the case with Humans as the language we use doesn't convey the exact same thing which we were thinking in our head. Machines would face the same issue.
so what im taking from this is if your a coder and established and have a job stick with it, if your thinking about learning coding dont.
This is a human problem, not a tech problem. At what point do we question companies about their commitment to HUMANS? What responsibilities do business and industry have towards us? Why are we talking as if it's acceptable as though possibly millions of jobs are replaced by AI?
History will tell us that we're reactive, not predictive in our behaviour, in regards to how we adapt to our changing surroundings. Things won't change until the masses end up on the streets, and that one humdinger of a winter produces more deaths than we can handle.
This is the way it’s meant to go. Humans are greedy. One year ago it became clear that we cracked the code to artificial general intelligence. While there are still some problems to solve, it’s just a matter of time at this point. From here on out it’s just a race to see who can produce these things the fastest. Our economic value is decreasing by the day, and soon we’ll be no different than animals. The question is whether some human(s) will control the AI, or it will go rogue. Either way, the human era has ended.
it can eliminate, google searchs for devs not the devs
Eventually it will eliminate the devs.
Anything can be automated. Fear is dumb, just do what you want to do. There is a kid somewhere building and working on AI right now and they will be the next Elon. Just do what you want, life is short.
All these videos miss an important take , coding is the first to get replaced because the people making the AI's know how to code so its easy for them to imagine creating an AI that can code , if lawyers where making these AI's it would replaces lawyers and so on
Accountants did not become obsolete when the calculator was invented or when quickbooks and other accounting packages were introduced, likewise coding will always be a prerequisite for software engineers to understand and implement whatever solutions AI will come up with.