Magick for Nonbelievers: Mitch Horowitz Speaking at Hereticon, Oct 30, 2024

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @happyhedgewytch4573
    @happyhedgewytch4573 18 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    Awesome talk!!! Interesting !!!

  • @hackenstring
    @hackenstring 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

    Zizek tells the story of Niels Bohr having a horseshoe above his front door. When asked if he believed in its 'lucky' powers, he said that the didn't... but that he had heard that its 'lucky' powers worked even if you didn't believe in it.

  • @jamesmccool503
    @jamesmccool503 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    I just downloaded the first episode on spotify.

  • @westdecker
    @westdecker 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    I hadn't realized how my own hangups were keeping me from even considering the practice of channeling sexual energy for other purposes (even if I may have been inadvertently engaging in this behavior in unintended ways throughout my life). Thank you for covering this in a way that allows me to be curious and forego the shame or taboo thoughts I had about sex magick.

    • @charliehilbrant
      @charliehilbrant 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      No wonder we are culturally shamed about understanding our sexual energy from a young age. It really is the key to unlocking SO much else isn’t it?

  • @williamkahl7978
    @williamkahl7978 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    You are IN Barbados and you went first class

  • @HyDeph0
    @HyDeph0 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    ☆☆☆

  • @psy-viruz
    @psy-viruz 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have some thoughts about retrocausality.
    There is some gap in our understanding of causality , the two main variants is determinism (linear causality) and indeterminism (non linear causality). While classical retrocausality is some kind of linear reversed determinism , there is probably some kind of non-classical non-linear reversed indeterminism.
    In a case of linear determination, things in a future absolutely determine present things , while in a case of non-linear indetermination the future events (or massive event) attracts only possibility or a chance of present event leading to future event.
    That may explain a difficulty in measuring retrocausal-related events.
    Maybe.

  • @susanseven7
    @susanseven7 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    What up mitch (tech n9ne)

  • @JivecattheMagnificent
    @JivecattheMagnificent 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Oooh, juicy.

  • @brienegan
    @brienegan 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    I really appreciate your cadence and clarity of explanation. You get to the point on ephemerally ethereal things.
    Thank you so much for that.
    💚🔯⚡️🪽✨️

  • @evwaldron
    @evwaldron 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is a more academic and less chaotic version of Grant Morrison's Disinfo talk on Chaos Magic.

  • @sqrfoot6548
    @sqrfoot6548 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    You're losing me Mitch. More methods

    • @AG-hx6qn
      @AG-hx6qn 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Totally agree. He even mentioned that horrid man Crowley....not a healthy reference....

  • @1stmoviefan
    @1stmoviefan 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Visualizing really work just not exactly.🎉😂