I Go Hands On With The First New Ram 1500 In Over 5 Years - Did They Get It Right?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.5K

  • @ToneNYC718
    @ToneNYC718 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +318

    Wow, the new Ram comes with everything. It even comes with dealer markup preinstalled at the factory.

    • @JB-ej8zy
      @JB-ej8zy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      😂😂

    • @edallen3383
      @edallen3383 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      At no extra cost. 😂😂😂

    • @tomstarcevich1147
      @tomstarcevich1147 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂😂😂😂🛻🛻🛻🛻🛻👍

    • @appleandre2735
      @appleandre2735 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yooooooo HHAAHHAHAHAHA

    • @JonBecker81
      @JonBecker81 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They’ll do a dealer installed markup too. 😂

  • @drayray4009
    @drayray4009 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    The prices are ridiculous no way

  • @christopher9626
    @christopher9626 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have to admit that I really loved that Rebel! Fantastic job, Andre! Just make sure that whatever trucks TFl gets has Cruise control!

  • @VortexVibe634
    @VortexVibe634 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I thought it was me, reading the comments clarifies my confusion: it looks almost the same as the previous one m.

  • @rubicondickweed
    @rubicondickweed 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    At long last a new Fiat 1500. I'm sure it will be spectacular. Your mechanics best friend is reborn!

    • @yissibiiyte
      @yissibiiyte 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Rams have historically been perfectly reliable for the most part.

    • @gpaje
      @gpaje 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nope, just a mid-cycle refresh same truck

    • @dirtbagliberalsnake5729
      @dirtbagliberalsnake5729 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ok ponyboy

    • @ohioguy4326
      @ohioguy4326 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fiat has largely not had a lot to do with the RWD platforms, now the FWD Jeeps are fiat Junk.

  • @DeepDishPizza
    @DeepDishPizza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Only $90k? Thats fantastic. Love it!

    • @nyquil762
      @nyquil762 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      🤣

    • @asvpab
      @asvpab 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      What a bargain

    • @P-J-W-777
      @P-J-W-777 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You have to be freaking kidding!

    • @Clam73
      @Clam73 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'll take two

    • @jrive075
      @jrive075 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      What a steal! Can’t wait to sign up for a 10 year finance loan at 15%

  • @alexlim1275
    @alexlim1275 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    cant tell a difference! SMH

  • @scobob
    @scobob 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't see anything in the Tungsten that would sway me away from my 2019 Longhorn. I'll hang on to the $40K I would save.

  • @theriseagainhomestead1055
    @theriseagainhomestead1055 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Basically a Wagoneer truck 👀👌🏽

  • @OttoTetrazzini
    @OttoTetrazzini 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +178

    Let's call it what is is - a COMPLIANCE engine that has more parts to fail and needs premium fuel for the HO version, which offsets any mileage improvement over the Hemi. $90k trucks with more maintenance cost. Zero savings to the consumer. Insane.

    • @steinwaymodelb
      @steinwaymodelb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Every engine is a 'compliance' engine. When the hemi replaced the magnum engines, the hemi was the 'compliance engine'.
      Objectively, an inline 6 is a simpler engine than a V8, so that's an improvement to me.

    • @mikebandw186
      @mikebandw186 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@steinwaymodelbyes, an inline 6 is mechanically reliable. But not when you add 2 turbos. Can it be done? Yes. Will it be reliable? Only time will tell and as usual the consumer gets to be the guinea pig.

    • @gpaje
      @gpaje 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@steinwaymodelb I'm not sure, adding twin turbos, that does not improve reliability simply for the fact it's more complex, plus 90% of RAMs will have the S.O.. engine, while producing more power, gets lower towing and payload rating.

    • @giovannimartinez2145
      @giovannimartinez2145 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      You are correct sir the H.O requires premium fuel which will kill any gas savings you need

    • @OttoTetrazzini
      @OttoTetrazzini 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@steinwaymodelb Not exactly sure that adding 3 extra camshafts, 8 more valves, direct injection and individual cooling systems for each turbo is more simple than an OHV V8. Although you do get a shorter crank and don't have to pay for an extra 2 pistons.

  • @_Charrizard_
    @_Charrizard_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +169

    With those prices, there's gonna be a surplus of these sitting on dealer lots as well 😂

    • @Turshin
      @Turshin 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I got my eye on that Rev and Ram charger. I'll pay the premium to save a ton of money on gas.

    • @Stanley-u4me
      @Stanley-u4me 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Already is... dodge ram crysler jeep. Packed solid.. then remove the v8 and its done.

    • @kevinblackburn3198
      @kevinblackburn3198 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fact

    • @alp3781
      @alp3781 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed!!!!

    • @Beaver-be8vk
      @Beaver-be8vk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yeah, and $200 a month zero down leases will be coming back as well. Right before they go bankrupt.

  • @kevinlucas8437
    @kevinlucas8437 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +261

    $89k manual steering adjustment 😅 these truck prices are ridiculous !!! They can keep it !!!

    • @armandoarmenta1942
      @armandoarmenta1942 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Exactly and with dealer markup they are easily going to be over 100k

    • @hellkitty1014
      @hellkitty1014 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      One less thing to break and how often will it need adjusting??

    • @MagnusVenter369
      @MagnusVenter369 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      don´t buy it.

    • @kevinlucas8437
      @kevinlucas8437 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Will never buy it !!!

    • @jadenantal1652
      @jadenantal1652 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@hellkitty1014I don't think that's a major failure point in modern vehicles lol

  • @erin7995
    @erin7995 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +122

    Shout out to the guy on the skateboard

  • @nicomay181
    @nicomay181 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Imagine paying 95k for a ram.. when the median salary is like 50k lol

  • @nismo370z4
    @nismo370z4 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Overpriced Stellantis junk !

  • @xxtreyxx12131990good
    @xxtreyxx12131990good 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    100k ram no thanks some thing that will lose half value in 2 years

    • @carlosmedrano3549
      @carlosmedrano3549 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i was thinking the same thing lol and now real shift handle my cousin had a laramie he sold it cause he was having issues with the gear knob

    • @3katd
      @3katd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah because it’s a half ton. A Heavy Duty truck would only lose like 30k value or less.

    • @omardevonlittle3817
      @omardevonlittle3817 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@carlosmedrano3549you have to turn it clockwise.... and be able to read. Super tricky

  • @kendavis1198
    @kendavis1198 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Nice Truck, GOOD LUCK SELLING IT For the Near $90 K STARTING PRICE!!!! Not happening over here.

  • @viziocamaro
    @viziocamaro 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    Can you show a trim that normal people can afford that would be nice

    • @tritchie6272
      @tritchie6272 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Is their any such truck left?

    • @creigmacc
      @creigmacc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Not really

    • @supporterofsanity
      @supporterofsanity 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I’m sure the bean counters have figured out that even if they sell less of a higher trim, they still make more money than selling more units of the lower trims.

    • @xLSU0408x
      @xLSU0408x 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      He did.... It's the invisible one none of us saw. I thought my '21 Laramie Night Edition was too high at $42k (sticker was $58k). Now they have the friggin Tradesman at that price. Unreal.

    • @christopherrichards8494
      @christopherrichards8494 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Stellantis is out of touch and has forgotten about the working class folks. (This pains me to say.) 😢

  • @ConfirmedPatriot
    @ConfirmedPatriot 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Trucks have fallen into the ‘niche’ category in price. People are calling for a ‘back to basic’ truck. Hopefully the lots will fill up with these instead of the ‘2nd mortgage’ models.

    • @cgatito3528
      @cgatito3528 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cowboy Cadillac's...

    • @chrisjohnston7132
      @chrisjohnston7132 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Chev made a back to basic truck, and it cost a fortune.

  • @henrysboy2
    @henrysboy2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    The price point on that Tungston is aspirational. I am bettings it’s significantly higher.

  • @MyViewToronto
    @MyViewToronto 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

    Nothing can replace a V8.

    • @zelenizub2036
      @zelenizub2036 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      Hemi with all its problems, was not the finest V8 representation.

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Yes. A lot can. Lol 💀

    • @TimeMachine7773
      @TimeMachine7773 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      8 V1s can.

    • @danielrichter3826
      @danielrichter3826 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@zelenizub2036
      The Hemi is not perfect and has its weaknesses.
      Just like those at GM and Ford.
      But to replace it with an even bigger piece of junk that is even more vulnerable.
      It doesn't work at all.!!

    • @P-J-W-777
      @P-J-W-777 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      No you just replace it with a piece of crap six cylinder that you have to add 2 turbos to given anywhere near the power and torque of a V8. If they had pulled their heads out of their rears and given V8’s twin turbos 6 cylinder engines wouldn’t be able to touch them. They will still suck when you start adding weight to them over and over. They won’t stand up to the boost. How do I know? I’ve pulled way too many trailers all the way up to 226k heavy haul on big trucks. The other V-6 turbo trucks don’t last when doing what trucks are designed to do. They don’t provide the same kind of power curve and smoothness the V-8 does. Unless you’ve done it on a daily basis as well as seen the v-6 crap in fleet use then you have no idea. All they did is make a much more complicated engine that is more expensive and more expensive to work on. They got rid of the V8 in order to get people over the V8 so they’ll start moving to EV. It’s being forced down your throat instead of giving you the option of choosing the engine you want.
      Sorry but Dodge doesn’t have much longer left in the car industry as they are about to lose a lot of loyal fans.

  • @killerb5726
    @killerb5726 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    Glad to see Tommy brought his skateboard….

    • @Kenopshi-q7c
      @Kenopshi-q7c 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Is that Tommy😂😂

  • @freedomisntfree_44
    @freedomisntfree_44 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +323

    They didnt change much 😂

    • @omardevonlittle3817
      @omardevonlittle3817 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

      Perfect. Learned from Toyota. Change the grill n call it a day.

    • @flandrescarlet486
      @flandrescarlet486 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@omardevonlittle3817You mean Ford

    • @UknowWhoWeR
      @UknowWhoWeR 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      They are refreshed that’s the point.

    • @IYUB30
      @IYUB30 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yee-teer

    • @mintdigggity
      @mintdigggity 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I was thinking the same thing

  • @danielrichter3826
    @danielrichter3826 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hello
    Thanks for the info guys.
    I am disappointed with Ram Trucks.
    How can you offer a Ram and Dodge in the future without a V8.
    and only with (V)6 engines.
    It's the wrong people at Ram, Dodge and Chrysler.
    The biggest mistake is that FCA joined forces with the French to create this Stellantis garbage.
    TFl guys you have the opportunity to talk to some of the people in charge at Dodge and Ram and express the displeasure of the brands' fans.
    A Ram without a V8 is not a Ram.
    They had five years to develop a new V8!
    My suggestion would be.
    Ram 1500 6.4l 450HP
    Ram 2500/3500
    6.2l supercharger 530HP
    Ram TRX 6.2l supercharger 750HP
    And that's until they present a new V8.
    And not an inflated, sophisticated 3l junk engine.
    They should bring back the Hemi V8.
    They should bring the legend back.!!!

    • @MyTubeUser321
      @MyTubeUser321 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      70% of Ram 2500s and 85% of Ram 3500s sold don’t have a V8 so…

    • @danielrichter3826
      @danielrichter3826 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MyTubeUser321
      You're right.
      The 6.7l Cummings is also a great engine.
      The question is whether they will be so stupid and throw him out.
      But taking out the 6.4l and replacing it with this 3l piece of crap at the end is an absolute mistake.

    • @MyTubeUser321
      @MyTubeUser321 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@danielrichter3826 we don’t know enough about this 3L to say for certain if it’s going to be a garbage engine or not. I’d agree that the displacement is a bit small for work purposes but the fact that it is a straight 6 (vs a V6) may bode well for durability.
      I do miss the V8 and I hope they offer a V8 option in the future, though unlikely thanks to this EV and climate change nonsense

  • @Lacoste9277
    @Lacoste9277 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    To me nothing will ever beat a V8 sure the numbers may be higher, but the sound of a V8 can't be beat especially when you open them up. If i cared more about how much my truck can tow I'll look at getting a 3/4 ton or 1 ton truck.

    • @tallll70
      @tallll70 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree i will miss it, but i did have better mpg lightweight with Pentastar v6 , same with 3.7 v6 f150, both about 25 mpg interstate when riding empty

    • @smiller225
      @smiller225 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It won't be hard to beat the reliability of the hemis

    • @tallll70
      @tallll70 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@smiller225 lol, i hope so, you never know ... for me 3th gen egr replace only until tree fell on it at 150k , 4th one exhaust header bolt broke already at 105k, luckily tick goes away in lik 10-20 seconds

    • @nezabytes
      @nezabytes 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At least they put an inline 6 and didn't put a vibration prone v6 like Ford did.

    • @imranchishti5457
      @imranchishti5457 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well said!

  • @Trevor4ag
    @Trevor4ag 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Screw the epa and the feds

    • @cptbuiltk7944
      @cptbuiltk7944 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go cry. Bless the EPA. ❤

    • @Trevor4ag
      @Trevor4ag 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cptbuiltk7944 suck my nox 😂

    • @Trevor4ag
      @Trevor4ag 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cptbuiltk7944 come breathe in my nox friend :)

  • @jcnme27
    @jcnme27 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Very disappointed.

  • @David-nx2vm
    @David-nx2vm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Depending on standard equipment, the Tradesman is the way to go if you’re a Ram guy. I was, but Ram lost me with rising prices and falling reliability. At $90k, that Tungsten needs to have Japanese-level quality but we all know it won’t.

    • @Lq32332
      @Lq32332 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tradesman is great. Got one with 30k miles right before covid - 2017 crewcab hemi 4wd. It’s been great- and I don’t care about mud in the cab or scratching the paint- the perfect camping / hunting truck.

  • @MrHemikid426
    @MrHemikid426 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When poopy pants gets out of office I believe the carb standards will change allowing V8's to come back. Hopefully Ram has a backup for there slant six so they can be competitive.

  • @PorscheSpeedster-kz6nc
    @PorscheSpeedster-kz6nc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Love the chassis view of the truck mechanicals. Just awesome.

    • @upshifter5316
      @upshifter5316 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. But wish it showed the cooling stack on there.
      Otherwise love how the cats are tucked up close. Prevent theft and fatten them up faster at startup.
      And where the air suspension air tanks are would make a great place for a battery pack for an SST hybrid!

    • @PorscheSpeedster-kz6nc
      @PorscheSpeedster-kz6nc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@upshifter5316 A hybrid would be cool. Especially if engineered for low end torque.

  • @zachyoung9227
    @zachyoung9227 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Not the Hemis!!!! RIP hemi....the V8s are going to be so missed just for ease of maintenance.

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not true.

    • @traciweisenbachCITB
      @traciweisenbachCITB 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DeepDishPizzahemi is dead. Go cry harder.

  • @bostondan77
    @bostondan77 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +97

    I had a Ram Limited and the interior felt VERY premium, more so than my wife's luxury SUV; the Tungsten takes it to the next level but that price, my God. Thanks Andre!

    • @hb7030
      @hb7030 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yeah but why would you buy an luxury truck? I have the laramie and I can't imagine wanting more luxury given I use it to snowboard and camp.

    • @steve8803
      @steve8803 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @bostondan77 It blows my mind that many of the people who complain about the expense of a vehicle, the gas etc.. have a truck that they do not actually use for anything other than commuting. A luxury truck is an oxymoron. It's not like you'll ever put anything in the bed anyway. Don't want to scratch anything!

    • @ohioguy4326
      @ohioguy4326 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@steve8803 I have a Big Horn and it has more features then I will ever use, Only thing I would like would be adaptive cruise which is coming to the big horn with this 2025

    • @steve8803
      @steve8803 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ohioguy4326 Hey, I a perfectly fine with people overbuying for things they don't really need. As long as they don't complain about money. Once they get to the point of complaining about finances, it's time to self reflect.

    • @markgullion1300
      @markgullion1300 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@hb7030 I own a black Ram Limited with all the options. I own a large construction company. I build custom luxury homes. I buy a luxury truck because I spend a lot of time in it. It's not only my way to get from job site to job site it's my mobile office as well. I use the truck bed, the hauling capabilities and all of the luxury features. Plus it wouldn't necessarily look good for my brand if the CEO shows up in an old rattletrap of a truck.

  • @Jay-bw3fl
    @Jay-bw3fl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Really like the new looks but no DRLs on the rebel is a step backward and a rip off imo.

  • @vr4787
    @vr4787 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    I’ll hold onto my Ram 1500 Classic Hemi, simple to work on, plenty of aftermarket parts, decent mpg, and plenty of power for my needs.

  • @ls1jeeper
    @ls1jeeper 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Maybe now they might finally put a new cab on the HD trucks... prob not maybe in 10 more years

  • @spizike9866
    @spizike9866 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    The Rebel grill looks so much better than the older style.

    • @313soldier313
      @313soldier313 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      That’s because it’s from a TRX. The entire front end is from a TRX which really cheapens TRX brand. Glad I sold mine

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@313soldier313 I own a TRX and it’s not even close. What is wrong with you?

    • @313soldier313
      @313soldier313 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DeepDishPizza yeah so did I. Until I realized what a load it was and traded it. It looks near identical to these “2025”. The hood vents, the emblem placement on the hood, the headlights, and the grill are lifted directly from a TRX. So are the recovery hooks.

    • @BadDriversOfMass
      @BadDriversOfMass 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Looks the same as any other Ram now. The old grill at least was different.. l.

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@BadDriversOfMass Huh? Are you blind?

  • @gjm5591
    @gjm5591 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I have the Ford f150 3.5L v6 twin turbo ecoboost . Bought it for towing my trailer. I prefer my old truck with a 5.0L v8 coyote engine. It was smoother power delivery, better fuel economy when pulling the same load!
    You can’t beat cubic inches. Plus overall upkeep is more on my ecoboost than my 5.0L.

    • @greggc8088
      @greggc8088 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That Coyote motor is the sheet but I bet you get good service out of the Ecoboost if you keep the oil changed regularly and figure out what to do with all the oil blow by. Like a catch can or draft tube. We drill a 1/8 hole in the bottom of the intercooler too to let the oil and condensation drain out when parked.

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I have 207k miles on my 3.5 ecoboost. All these years I’ve had it I thought it was a lot better than the 5.0. Smooth, pulls everything I needed better than the v8 could. And when I drive( I don’t drive mine hard) it gets better gas mileage. I get it, it’s a v8, the sound is great and all, but there’s no comparison between these two engines. The 3.5 ecoboost is a lot better.

    • @Bradimus1
      @Bradimus1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      5.0 has a terrible powerband for a truck. No low end torque. Just sounds good. One of the last trucks I'd ever buy is a 5.0 Ford.

    • @NXT_LVL
      @NXT_LVL 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well yeah. Jason Cammisa told us years back a downsized twin turbo anything will get better fuel economy if you drive it like the EPA did; like a sedated nun.
      Coworker had a turbo Elantra. 13 city 32 hwy. he said the gearing kept the turbo lit in traffic

    • @joshuaw2988
      @joshuaw2988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’ll keep my 6.2 Chevy trailboss over these 6 banger turbo engines, cheaper to maintain

  • @ericneal1872
    @ericneal1872 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    In 2019 I had to trade my '17 Ram 1500 with a 5.7L V8 for a Ford Ranger with a 2.3L turbo i4 (because my new garage was too small). Two things happened that I did NOT expect. 1 - I didn't lose any hauling or towing capability with the 4cyl Ranger. (except downhill engine braking) 2- my fuel economy was better with the full sized V8. (The Ram had the 3.21 rear gearing)

    • @alexgrindnshine2522
      @alexgrindnshine2522 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s crazy your mileage wasn’t better with the ranger. How did you like your ram and what was your mpg

    • @ericneal1872
      @ericneal1872 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@alexgrindnshine2522 I actually love(d) both trucks. Interior was way better in the Ram both style and comfort (Big Horn vs xlt). The Ram rode better, and got better highway fuel economy (16 city 20 hwy) . And of course, it had that beautiful, sweet, feeling and sounding V8 engine with a bigger gas tank. The Ranger lacks nothing in the power department although not as smooth and doesn't sound near as good, even with the fake engine sounds from the speakers. The Ranger destroys the Ram off road in 4x4 situations and tight parking lots. I tow a pretty big 7200# travel trailer that both handle easily. The Ranger gets better city mileage (19 city 19 hwy).and, of course, the absolute most important factor, the Ranger fits in my garage.

    • @alexgrindnshine2522
      @alexgrindnshine2522 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ericneal1872 that’s cool, I know people have there mixed feelings about turbo engines. I personally think they have more pros then cons. As long as they are built well of course. I own a 16 focus ST 2.0L turbo and it’s been a fantastic car, great performance and mileage. Also own a 23 toyota highlander 2.4L turbo and that has fantastic performance and great mileage. I have yet to tow with it, but I know it makes like 310lb tq at 1700rpm so I am confident it will tow as good as the first gen V8 Durangos that also have.

    • @AleksandrPodolski
      @AleksandrPodolski 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No HEMI-never buy!

    • @ericneal1872
      @ericneal1872 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AleksandrPodolski I had 4 ram 1500's in a row all with v-8s. Never a single mechanical problem. Always put a smile on my face. I don't share you sentiment.

  • @AdventureRocks
    @AdventureRocks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    How does RAM keep topping and outdoing themselves on the interiors?!! Great presentation.

    • @AdammJarvis
      @AdammJarvis 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Because they can't get fleet sales so they gotta go after the cubical workers

    • @andrewmendoza1578
      @andrewmendoza1578 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AdammJarvisidk I see A LOT of Rams out here on the job sites. All the backhoe operators we had only use Rams to tow all their tractors.

    • @RageHP-RageHorsePower
      @RageHP-RageHorsePower 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really a big tablet an cheap leather

    • @dirtbagliberalsnake5729
      @dirtbagliberalsnake5729 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lots of rams out there in the bush too​@@andrewmendoza1578

    • @dirtbagliberalsnake5729
      @dirtbagliberalsnake5729 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tahwseodtilol lame

  • @bigsmith7349
    @bigsmith7349 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Truck didn't change much..but them i6 turbo motors will be junk for the first year like toyota. So if you want one id hold of and let the bugs get worked out

  • @snick111
    @snick111 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Queue the commnets: "I'll stick with my V8." "I'm never selling my 5.7." "Why switch to a turbo?"

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m switching. Can’t wait.

    • @danielrichter3826
      @danielrichter3826 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      👍 yes . The V8 is the best engine

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danielrichter3826 Incorrect.

  • @nospark333
    @nospark333 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    @ 4:02, they said this about the eco diesel as well.

    • @jflowers090
      @jflowers090 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol facts

  • @TeXasDadBod
    @TeXasDadBod 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It’s like Ram wants us to buy a GMC AEV edition

  • @sportmedtech
    @sportmedtech 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is a no from me. Not because of the engine or the restyling but because of FCA/RAM\STELLANTIS shenanof the last few years. From dieselgate 1 and leaving eco diesel owners high and dry to their lack of innovation for YEARS on these trucks yet still charging PREMIUM prices to Dieselgate 2 and the second time cheating emissions to dealers playing games with pricing and charging ridiculous markups on TRX’s while RAM did NOTHING about it(possibly being involved too) to how they are screwing over 3500 loyal employees. No more mopar vehicles from me ever again.

  • @billseiler4952
    @billseiler4952 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Let’s be honest - the engine change is not for better gas mileage but to be able to charge more $$$ at the time of purchase and at 100,000 when the turbo blows

    • @omardevonlittle3817
      @omardevonlittle3817 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      No. It's so they can advertise gaudy power numbers and still meet emission regulations. All about NoX. They would make far more selling hemis n cummins forever. Those billions in R&D have already been recouped

    • @PlayWaves1
      @PlayWaves1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It's for emissions but it also gives you better pulling power. Torque comes in at lower RPMs and the curve is flatter.

    • @davidporter7051
      @davidporter7051 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      projecting much? In reality there is no way to validate your comment.

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @billseiler4952 lol stupid comment. No your wrong. 💀

    • @jefffawcett1626
      @jefffawcett1626 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's a terribly uninformed take and highly unlikely. Agree with others that the move to small displacement/turbo powerplants is a natural outcome of the manufacturer's need to produce higher mpg and less emissions. I bought a '22 GMC Sierra AT4 w/ 6.2L V8 so I could enjoy V8 power (especially the sounds), maybe for the last time. But prior to this latest truck, I actually had a Ford F150 Platinum w/ 3.5L Ecoboost V6, and it was an excellent vehicle as well. I owned it for ca. 150k miles with no issues other than replacing an injector.

  • @Cloud30000
    @Cloud30000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No eTorque on the hurricane? What happened to their industry shattering technological breakthrough?

    • @PlayWaves1
      @PlayWaves1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It did it's job. It got about 1 mpg better overall for 5.3 hemi which can be a lot of money over the ownership period of the truck.

  • @fivesfilms
    @fivesfilms 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    These trucks look good. Now let's see what happens with the HDs for 2025 or 2026.

    • @SHAKA.RAPTOR
      @SHAKA.RAPTOR 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Definitely curious about the upcoming years. 🤙🏼🤙🏼

  • @WW-wf8tu
    @WW-wf8tu 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ram Charger, with a 6? WTH?! Won't be on my shopping list. None of those are. No V8, it won't be great. Marketing cannot convince the loyalists to buy a product that has been stripped of its allure. So, self destruct or bring back the V8, their choice. Because I know what mine is. 😏

  • @SuperAbooboo
    @SuperAbooboo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Oh my, High strung turbo engine made by dodge. What could go wrong?

    • @-_-_-_-318
      @-_-_-_-318 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dodge and Ram are two different companies.😊

    • @applianceman6009
      @applianceman6009 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Two different brands made by the same company😊

  • @stevenintexas6947
    @stevenintexas6947 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I guess RAM doesn’t want to sell a lot of trucks. The pricing has gone overboard. I owned a 2021 RAM Limited and I have buyers remorse for spending so much.

  • @rerod650
    @rerod650 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I own a Wagoneer L with the standard output 3L SST. From my ownership experience so far, it outperforms every V8 I’ve ever owned in every way except for one caveat. It lacks the personality of the V8, which is very important to the truck community. I wish government regulations would get out of the way so OEMs would offer the choice of turbo or V8.
    For me if I were buying commuter truck, like the luxury tungsten truck I would want the 3L, but a fun truck like the Rebel I would prefer a v8. Just my opinion.

    • @NewTireSmell
      @NewTireSmell 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What’s the mpg been like? Better than a HEMI?

    • @cptbuiltk7944
      @cptbuiltk7944 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My air is more important than your truck engine choice

  • @luis.capsalot8124
    @luis.capsalot8124 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why put that hybrid truck on EV channel. Doesn't make any sense !!!! Just leave it in your truck channel, because I will not watch your EV channel at all !!!! I appreciate it what you guys do, but it just doesn't do it for me.

  • @SuperNova23333
    @SuperNova23333 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    That looks like an absolute nightmare to replace a turbo if it ever went out.

    • @observer950
      @observer950 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You used to own one before. Now I know why not to buy this

    • @onthethrottle7104
      @onthethrottle7104 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why, the turbo's are right at the top side...have you ever seen Ford's v6 turbos? They take a full day to get at before you can get a wrench on one of the bolts. This RAM set up looks actually very easy to get to the turbos. And yes, I have been in the industry for 42 years technician so I think I know.

    • @randalsweeting661
      @randalsweeting661 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The ford gas turbos are in the wheel well ? We just changed one with the 3.5 gas engine and it was out and in unless then 4 hours.

    • @onthethrottle7104
      @onthethrottle7104 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@randalsweeting661 4 hours is a long time you got lucky.

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@randalsweeting661 @onthethrottle was just trying to sound dramatic with the replacement of a turbo. He failed

  • @wizeguiz
    @wizeguiz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The 2024 Rams are awesome, but these trucks (and I mean all brands) are getting ridiculous in price! I used to buy a new vehicle every two years and now I am done. I will look for used instead. Cheers!

  • @raskyr1
    @raskyr1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The Tungsten looks amazing! Not a fan of the price increases though, which is why I just went with a nicely discounted 2024 model.

  • @aw_overland
    @aw_overland 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I love my 2016 with Pentastar V6, solid, reliable powerful. 150k and counting with no issues

    • @erikkarlonas180
      @erikkarlonas180 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I have same year with 5.7 at 130k, been solid as rock. Other than normal maintenance and one front wheel bearing (under warranty)it’s been great. Had an 06 before it that was still running great at 250k when I traded it in 19

    • @pech_wake_day1153
      @pech_wake_day1153 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And gutless, your forgot gutless pentastar

    • @brandonruhl1639
      @brandonruhl1639 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@pech_wake_day1153I’ve driven many V6 Ram’s and it’s far from gutless. Unless you’re an idiot and are racing it, it’s got more than enough power for daily driving, merging onto a highway and light towing.

    • @dirtbagliberalsnake5729
      @dirtbagliberalsnake5729 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My 15 is going strong as well!

    • @johnnorvaisas
      @johnnorvaisas 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Much better then this new crap

  • @elite4916
    @elite4916 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who can afford these vehicles Yea for that price for a dodge ram I hope for 90k it's fully loaded still...PASS

  • @scottperson9487
    @scottperson9487 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Long term quality needs to improve more than a mild facelift.

    • @TermlessHGW
      @TermlessHGW 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Couldn't agree more. Give me less features, smaller screens etc. but give me a product that's designed, engineered and built with long term reliability as a priority.

  • @Igoriann
    @Igoriann 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If anything, I’d like to see them go back a step. Make more simple affordable trucks. No one wants to spend 70+k on a dodge. If they had brains, they’d bring back renamed dakota and make it under 35k. Make it simple, make it a truck not a Luxury vehicle that a worker would be too scared to step in with dirty shoes. Does Stellantis really need my recommendations.. can’t they figure this out themselves

  • @sail72
    @sail72 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    The cost of these new trucks has convinced me to go another direction. Currently saving up for a 1980s Bullnose F-250. For the same money as a down-payment and 2 monthly payments on these Rams I can buy one, restore everything under the hood, upgrade to softer springs and shocks and do everything with an old Ford these things can do except for big towing, which I don't plan on doing anyway.

    • @smithjones1906
      @smithjones1906 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do you live in a locational with minimal oxidation concerns? If so, I endorse your redirection.

    • @sail72
      @sail72 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@smithjones1906 I'm in the Northeast. I plan to buy one from the South and I'd keep it parked in the winter and continue daily driving my Subaru.

    • @iamthesupremeleader
      @iamthesupremeleader 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm saving up for a Komatsu D355A.

    • @christopher9626
      @christopher9626 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yup. I looked at new trucks last year and.........I turned around and went and bought a 98 ram 1500 instead.

    • @RamblinRoadies
      @RamblinRoadies 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You won't have the luxury of the most current government tracking device in that old truck.

  • @kelliefernald449
    @kelliefernald449 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You can fool a lot of people with a soy burger but a lot of people will only ever buy the real deal. Ram just handed 25% + of their sales to ford and GM without a v8 option

  • @turdferguson2839
    @turdferguson2839 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ram didn't really need to do anything, they just made it different to say its new and charge more money. That new 6 cylinder might be faster but the old hemi v8 will definitely last longer.

  • @sanjesh86
    @sanjesh86 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Love how excited Andre gets reviewing new trucks, can tell by his heavy breathing. 😂

    • @sunchaser999
      @sunchaser999 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      lol!

    • @phantom0456
      @phantom0456 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ohhhh YEAHHHH!!!

    • @scarroll625
      @scarroll625 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have asthma

  • @ryanzimmermann9160
    @ryanzimmermann9160 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bought a 23 rebel, and the 25 is not that exciting. Looks pretty much the same and loses the hemi. I will say the extra screen on the front passenger side is interesting. But overall meh, we’ll see how well it does in a year or when the neutered trx comes out

  • @rosscooper3778
    @rosscooper3778 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    still no power tilt telescope steering wheel on the tungston model ,can not believe for 90K

    • @silvergeoff568
      @silvergeoff568 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Makes no sense they left it out. My wife’s 2018 Grand Cherokee has a power telescoping wheel so it would’ve been super easy for Fiat to raid the parts bin to add to the 1500s.

    • @moparjr89
      @moparjr89 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@silvergeoff568 my 2011 charger and 14 jeep have it but not my ram

  • @TheXOoftheRO
    @TheXOoftheRO 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's just the most powerful pound-for-pound engine option in American history, and actually has more power per displacement than almost every supercar in existence. No biggy

  • @88plumber2
    @88plumber2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Let's hear that big 5.7 V8 o that's right ram went woke

    • @omardevonlittle3817
      @omardevonlittle3817 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As a v8 fanboy myself, you sound dumb

  • @hahaadventures4838
    @hahaadventures4838 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice try Ram. No V8, then no Ram for me. I’d prefer a 4.0 twin turbo Hemi V8!!!

  • @brianmoralee7628
    @brianmoralee7628 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Glad I got one of the last true 5.7 hemis. 2022 non e-torque bighorn

    • @greggc8088
      @greggc8088 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Non E-torque is great. Hope you get good service from it.

    • @benwea76
      @benwea76 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      That's what everyone with a base model truck says.

    • @brandonm6052
      @brandonm6052 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      On the opposite end we got one of the very early or first hemis back in 2003 for our area. It’s in a 2500 regular cab. Heck we even somehow have the Nebraska plate HEMI as it was still available.

    • @arthurwright255
      @arthurwright255 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm just glad the Hemi is being put to bed. It's an outdated dinosaur of an engine tbh, all it was good for was going fast in Hell Cats. The new Hurricane is ok, but EV is still preferred by most. The brilliant thing is now that there are a lot of EV trucks it opens up the market to a lot of new consumers who want the EV efficiency with the practicality of a truck.

    • @rhettsalsbury9394
      @rhettsalsbury9394 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@arthurwright255sometimes “dinosaurs” are more reliable than new engines. Some of us actually want the simplicity of a NA V8 and not the complexity of a DOHC twin turbo I6 that is gonna be bound to have problems

  • @haze1123
    @haze1123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Man, everything is going turbo. Reliability and longevity will certainly suffer.
    I would wait a couple model years before buying any new engine design.

  • @TimeMachine7773
    @TimeMachine7773 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    89k for a pickup is insane!

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s your opinion. You might want to better your career so you can afford it. Don’t blame the manufacturer for the price. Blame yourself.

    • @JohnDoe-nz6bk
      @JohnDoe-nz6bk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@DeepDishPizzano, the price is insane. And, I make 6 figures.

    • @TimeMachine7773
      @TimeMachine7773 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DeepDishPizza Let's see... At 32 I built a house and RV park in cash. I'm living abroad for a couple of years to spend time with my wife's family and when I get back I'll be kicking off a search and rescue school thanks to the experience from being 10 years of being a geospatial and lidar analyst. Aka go screw yourself!

    • @davidporter7051
      @davidporter7051 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@JohnDoe-nz6bk6 figures doesn't mean much today. That is about 54K in 2000 dollars.

    • @nyquil762
      @nyquil762 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@DeepDishPizza your are joking, right?

  • @scottpetersen8386
    @scottpetersen8386 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's going to be interesting how the new motor will be accepted,,truck guys liked the hemi

  • @benrupp04
    @benrupp04 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Looks a lot like the old Ram ha

  • @dallasfrost1996
    @dallasfrost1996 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Doesn't look like Ram changed much with their internal combustion versions. The Tungsten is pretty nice, but it'd still rather have the Denali Ultimate with the 6.2L.

  • @clay282
    @clay282 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This is all so insane to me. I get it, times change, prices change but! My 20 Ram 1500 Bighorn optioned up to almost Laramie level was stickers at 48k and rebated to 44k. 4 years later… that’s the stripped base model price? INSANITY!

  • @frdmstnggt99
    @frdmstnggt99 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    $95k fully loaded Tungsten trim and the rear window will leak within 2 years.

  • @youngblood23rb
    @youngblood23rb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Way past time for Ram to have new engine choices but should have kept the V8 option

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I disagree.

    • @lesalbro8880
      @lesalbro8880 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@DeepDishPizza About which part?

    • @Trevor4ag
      @Trevor4ag 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I bet to keep up with epa requirements they couldn’t

    • @youngblood23rb
      @youngblood23rb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​​@@DeepDishPizzaWhat* do you disagree with? GM and Ford are sales leaders, more variety and V8 Options are what alot of customers want

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@youngblood23rb GM and Ford are junk and even boomers know it.

  • @outen21
    @outen21 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That electric truck is gonna be a bust like the ford lighting. Maybe one day they will learn

  • @levicharles996
    @levicharles996 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    With Stellantjs struggling to sell vehicles and having the largest price increase of any manufacturer. I wonder how long these will stay on the lot.

    • @freedomstar3814
      @freedomstar3814 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      999 days ... and at day 1,000 they will knock off 1k on msrp !

  • @austinatomTV
    @austinatomTV 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So….we basically are gonna have to buy HD trucks to get any work done.

  • @Spoolingturbski
    @Spoolingturbski 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    They look great. But what Ram really needs to focus on is the Heavy Duty. We need more gears, increase of horsepower and torque, exterior update and improved underpinnings and frame. Also will the heavy duty have a gas powered option, if so what will it be?

    • @dieselcanuck87
      @dieselcanuck87 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The heavy duty trucks have copious amounts of power and torque…..more than 97% of people even need/use.

    • @Spoolingturbski
      @Spoolingturbski 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dieselcanuck87 unfortunately that’s not how this competitive market works. For instance, people may go for a ford or GM simply because they like having a 10 speed opposed to Rams 6. A hot shot driver or guy who hauls a gooseneck might like the idea of having way more truck for the job. You have to stay highly competitive and in Rams case as the under dog… they have to be the best.

    • @TevisC
      @TevisC 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you need the power and capacity the manufactures rate the HD trucks at, you really should be looking at a medium duty truck and have a CDL. .. 2004 RAM CTD 6spd manual was enough to gross 42,000#... Just don't tell dot..

    • @Spoolingturbski
      @Spoolingturbski 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TevisCI agree with you 100%. Trucks are getting out of control. I have a first gen Dodge Ram Cummins. 12 v Cummins with an old manual. I can haul my 10,000lb trailer just fine lol. But at the end of the day, the market is what decides what’s logical or not.

  • @GTAIVVibes
    @GTAIVVibes 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ya.....no ill pass. They upped the price by 10k and they downgraded the engines.

  • @Desmo1
    @Desmo1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I have a '22 Ram Limited and till this day there's no one that gets into it and doesn't comment "it's the nicest interior they've ever been in". Now if they could only get an infotainment software that's as good.

    • @SliderFury1
      @SliderFury1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I had a '22 Limited 1500 myself (night edition) and yes, it's a really nice interior. Also yes, the infotainment system sucks lol.
      Went to an F350 Lariat and the downgrade in overall material quality of the interior isn't nearly as much as I thought it would be.
      Basically, after 2 years I realized I didn't really care about having slightly fancier looking interior trimmings and wanted something more capable and more intuitive.

    • @Jerry300zx1
      @Jerry300zx1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I too have a 22 limited. I agree the infotainment needs to be updated. I'm constantly reseting the radio to get my android auto to work. Other than that, the truck is a dream to drive and go on road trips in.

    • @Desmo1
      @Desmo1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SliderFury1 My father has an F250 and it's been in the dealer more times than he can count for their notorious suspension issues and the interior is trash compared to the Rams, albeit his is probably closer to a '20 model. Their dealers are cash but that's becoming more a common thing among domestic manufacturers.

    • @Desmo1
      @Desmo1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Jerry300zx1 Stop being that guy and get yourself an iOS device lol, your friends and family will appreciate it.

  • @luismancilla650
    @luismancilla650 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    kinda sad that the v6 and i6 is the new v8. no more great sound coming from trucks

  • @lyndonhamby7432
    @lyndonhamby7432 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That in-line 6 should be a torque monster for sure 💪🏻🇺🇸👍

  • @alexandersheppard1997
    @alexandersheppard1997 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would never consider buying a truck at that kind of price!

  • @jasonpitts8395
    @jasonpitts8395 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Historically a straight 6 is really durable and will last. Back in the day Ford had a 300 cubic inch straight 6 and you could get 250K miles out of one easy. That is back when vehicles lasted a long time and you could actually afford them. I am keeping my 2021 RAM 2500 until the prices drop, which means I will own it forever.

    • @yissibiiyte
      @yissibiiyte 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      A big part of that durability was displacement. I doubt these newer I6's will be as durable.

    • @JS-ov9jb
      @JS-ov9jb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I was thinking the same. The 4.0 straight 6 in jeeps was a great motor for years

    • @ScottsGuitar
      @ScottsGuitar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m with you. So glad I ordered my 21 right before Covid and got a decent price on mine. If I tried to buy the same spec in my rebel for ‘25 I’d be paying likely 10-15k more for a less reliable truck 😂

    • @iamthesupremeleader
      @iamthesupremeleader 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That Ford motor was right out of a tractor, and it was naturally aspirated. Bulletproof great motors. These motors will have so many problems and terrible longevity. Pushing boost out of such a tiny block... that much power... no good.

    • @Turshin
      @Turshin 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A Mopar slant 6 was even more reliable

  • @epicrentals
    @epicrentals 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another video. No road test. We want to see the motor perform already alright!

  • @overlandski7795
    @overlandski7795 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had a 2019 longhorn now i have a 2021 Laramie night edition and i think im done with Ram. Its one thing introducing a new engine its another to get rid of the v8 all together. Even ford still has the v8 available. Im getting 18mpg with my hemi lifted on 35” tires using 87 octane. These will most likely require premium fuel. Also the price of Rams is stupid high right now. I got my 2019 longhorn for 49k my laramie for 60k and now a ram with same features stickers at over 75k. Ram will need to do 20k discount ( they already are taking 14k off some trucks)

  • @theprfesssor
    @theprfesssor 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Pretty cool how they are bringing back a straight 6 engine, now with turbos its gonna be interesting to see how it holds up especially the high output version.......it has a lot to live up to the 4.0 is a legendary S6 made by this company

  • @mvcharisma
    @mvcharisma 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    An underwhelming update from a cash strapped manufacturer 😂

  • @TxHammer757
    @TxHammer757 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Well I will never buy a new one. No V8 no RAM truck...........Never own a EV PERIOD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @mikek5298
      @mikek5298 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Why do you think we care about your opinion?

    • @johnnyfreeman1018
      @johnnyfreeman1018 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@mikek5298......so why did you give your opinion about their opinion?.....it's the You Tube comments armchair quarterback section Mikey.....🤷‍♂️

    • @danielrichter3826
      @danielrichter3826 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      👍 yes . Bring back the Hemi V8!!!!!!!!

  • @chaleowin7732
    @chaleowin7732 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Huge fan of the styling of the Ram. Screw you for no V8 option. Don't get me started on the prices.

  • @art-is-lazy4509
    @art-is-lazy4509 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That over boosted little 3 liter is going to work hard.

    • @davidporter7051
      @davidporter7051 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      definitely lazy. It's a mild boost. If anything I would knock it's design heritage. 😊

    • @JJD-9403
      @JJD-9403 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Forged internals. It's not gonna struggle. Boost the shit out if it. It will be fine.

    • @Tylnorton
      @Tylnorton 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Some of the best engines are inline 6.

    • @okcmoparguy724
      @okcmoparguy724 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Internals and block are very robust. Mopar performance "Cat X" version of the Hurricane is over 1000hp. I could see problems for those that push/extend maintenance intervals. No engine is immune to this but some fare better than others.

    • @davidporter7051
      @davidporter7051 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@okcmoparguy724 you are wrong there is no such thing as Mopar Performance. The Hurricane is an Alfa Romeo engine.

  • @melvinjacobs2328
    @melvinjacobs2328 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Keep raising the prices. How's that working for you?

  • @ninersforlife7682
    @ninersforlife7682 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I remember when the EcoBoost 3.5 came out I heard all my Dodge/RAM friends say oh Dodge/Ram would never do that and look where we're at now. To me the Rebel doesn't look much different body-wise. 🙂

    • @Scypher0th
      @Scypher0th 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and look where the ecoboost v6 is today...no one wants it.....this is going to be the same for ram now sadly.

    • @cptbuiltk7944
      @cptbuiltk7944 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@Scypher0th the 3.5 eb is a fantastic engine. Love mine. Sorry ur pp doesnt work

    • @ninersforlife7682
      @ninersforlife7682 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Scypher0th You're right even though Ford sell over a million of them a year worldwide nobody wants one 🙂

    • @hellkitty1014
      @hellkitty1014 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I admit it, I was one of those. At that time, Hemi and Ram were like PB&J. And that only increased once CDJR HELLCATED allllll the things! But times do change and if they had to go small-displacement, thankfully they went straight six.

    • @ninersforlife7682
      @ninersforlife7682 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hellkitty1014 I heard he same thing from Toyota fans saying Toyota would never ditch the 5.7 😁

  • @wowphillips
    @wowphillips 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Manual tilt and adjust steering wheel on a 95k truck...?

  • @CACressida
    @CACressida 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Bring on the aftermarket blow off valves. Cant wait to hear this I6 straight piped.

  • @ivaniuk123
    @ivaniuk123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have a 2014 ram 1500 ecodiesel and that things has been nothing but trouble. When it came out it looked like the next big thing and because it's a diesel I thought it would be reliable but ram made it into the opposite of reliable. I have a strong feeling these new generation of trucks will be the same as the ecodiesel. Cool to look at and drive short term but plagued with problems.

  • @dennisl6198
    @dennisl6198 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    man, that engine looks sweet. If a person can get this truck with this engine for low 40s, that's pretty great. we'll see.

    • @W0RLDSSMALLESTVI0LIN
      @W0RLDSSMALLESTVI0LIN 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not gonna happen. The base model starts at 43k, with the 3.6 V6.