There I put 2 decklist there, so people won't ask "why you have this card that card but not on the decklist?" those that are different than the decklist is just handtraps and some staple card that are depends on the duel that I had, even if I keep match up with runick, i'll even drop 3 handtraps and add 3 cosmic cyclone or chaos hunter, but the core cards of the deck are same and its necessary for the deck to be working, and its also a budget when I grind for gems, until I get the current decklist one. And I'm sure people gonna ask "how is this deck going second?" Don't worry I prepare another video that are going second compilation with the same decklist as this one, I destroy full branded despia and pendulum magician board with it, and also I'm preparing a full indepth guide for this deck, Stay Tuned!
Of Course it's super consistent when you show only Circular opener. Maybe show some other opener where you have to search for Circular to inspire more combo ideas.
@SCP-049 oh my God! Finally, thats so cool. I haven't seen someone who's plays the same decks in such a long time. I've been looking to do another cyberse type deck. Maybe mathmech or marincess or maybe even salamangreat.
Very nice. I've been having fun with Mathmech, even named by deck "Alge-Bruh". Tese showcases were fun to watch. But how well does the deck do if forced to go Second?
I’ve been thinking over this myself, the advantages of both are good but ghost belle also can be small worlded into circ if you play veiler. Has more going for it on both turns.
small world, Maxx c > gatchiri > any mathmech including lady dee bug and micro coder gatchiri on hand can special summon to the field as well, extra bodies for link summoning
tried it, its less consistent, and most of the combo you won't get your superfactorial..and the omni negate require you to return libro monster to hand, while cynet conflict is not, it banish the card and prohibit it to use the whole turn..
it's a nice deck but why would you play other cards when the mathmechs monsters are free special summons why would you play nabla and multiplication when you're not playing the synchro monster why are you playing one sigma It summons itself for free I'm not gonna lie I don't like this 😅 i think it's worse than the pure mathmechs deck
yes addition and substraction is free special summon but putting them to 3 makes you get less circular or diameter , and micro coder doesnt even need to be special summon, and you can search cynet mining with it, exceed is free 2 level 4 bodies whenever you link summon, final sigma is great but I still need 2 alembertian, and it also lose to mirrormatch, opponent laplacian can remove final sigma easily i use nabla for extender, and multiplication for 10K attack 1 sigma is enough why you need 2 of it? if you open it on hand, you don't need circular to send another sigma from deck..
@@fafnirymd circular can send any monster it doesn't have to be sigma + you have so many ways to circular even if you don't open final sigma is for otk only you summon it when your opponent has a 2000 atk or less or when you have substraction in your hand it's safer than accessess code it's uneffected and it comes up so many times you need more than one sigma cuz you have to link it away sometimes and it will get banished sense you're not playing final sigma I don't see why would you play nabla and multiplication
There I put 2 decklist there, so people won't ask "why you have this card that card but not on the decklist?" those that are different than the decklist is just handtraps and some staple card that are depends on the duel that I had, even if I keep match up with runick, i'll even drop 3 handtraps and add 3 cosmic cyclone or chaos hunter, but the core cards of the deck are same and its necessary for the deck to be working, and its also a budget when I grind for gems, until I get the current decklist one.
And I'm sure people gonna ask "how is this deck going second?" Don't worry I prepare another video that are going second compilation with the same decklist as this one, I destroy full branded despia and pendulum magician board with it, and also I'm preparing a full indepth guide for this deck, Stay Tuned!
Can’t wait for in-depth guide!
Budget version, multiple combo routes showed and duel examples, 10K ACCESSCODE?? yeah insta sub
Of Course it's super consistent when you show only Circular opener. Maybe show some other opener where you have to search for Circular to inspire more combo ideas.
yeah lol
What rank have you reached with this version of Mathmech? I'm having trouble breaking out of Platinum II ugh. Any tips?
currently in plat 1, 1 more game to diamond 5 T_T
if u really want it too be more consistent remove those parrallel exceeds
Yooo can you make mathmech @ignister ignister deck btw cool video man you are one of the best Yu-Gi-Oh creators i have seen keep the good work
Yoo, I actually play ignister and code talkers (seperately). That would be sick!
@@RickJay13 what a coincidence i play them too
@SCP-049 oh my God! Finally, thats so cool. I haven't seen someone who's plays the same decks in such a long time. I've been looking to do another cyberse type deck. Maybe mathmech or marincess or maybe even salamangreat.
@@RickJay13 mekk knight is also cyberse i have a friend who likes it and it sounds pretty good deck
@SCP-049 oh really? That actually sounds pretty fun. I didn't realize that they were cyberse. That's actually gonna be my next deck
Very nice. I've been having fun with Mathmech, even named by deck "Alge-Bruh". Tese showcases were fun to watch. But how well does the deck do if forced to go Second?
next video I'll show you how to go second with it.. 😂
Interesting playing the code talker engine in mathmech
Do you think ghost belle better than Maxx C in mathmech? Also, what is the purpose of Gatchiri in the deck?
I’ve been thinking over this myself, the advantages of both are good but ghost belle also can be small worlded into circ if you play veiler. Has more going for it on both turns.
small world, Maxx c > gatchiri > any mathmech including lady dee bug and micro coder
gatchiri on hand can special summon to the field as well, extra bodies for link summoning
@@fafnirymd gatchiri sucks
Which is better in your opinion
which is what?
Actual or budget
@@demariosmith9261 bruh you know what budget means right?
@@fafnirymd no need to be rude about it
@@Barnacle121 its not rude, if i'm asking it,if he don't know then I explain it..
Crystal beast video when?
inherit playmaker's will and play cyberse deck
Nice this version is slightly less bad
Make a Mathmech libromancer cause libromancers don’t normal summon and they’re also cyberse
tried it, its less consistent, and most of the combo you won't get your superfactorial..and the omni negate require you to return libro monster to hand, while cynet conflict is not, it banish the card and prohibit it to use the whole turn..
it's a nice deck but
why would you play other cards when the mathmechs monsters are free special summons
why would you play nabla and multiplication when you're not playing the synchro monster
why are you playing one sigma It summons itself for free
I'm not gonna lie I don't like this 😅
i think it's worse than the pure mathmechs deck
yes addition and substraction is free special summon but putting them to 3 makes you get less circular or diameter ,
and micro coder doesnt even need to be special summon, and you can search cynet mining with it, exceed is free 2 level 4 bodies whenever you link summon,
final sigma is great but I still need 2 alembertian, and it also lose to mirrormatch, opponent laplacian can remove final sigma easily
i use nabla for extender, and multiplication for 10K attack
1 sigma is enough why you need 2 of it? if you open it on hand, you don't need circular to send another sigma from deck..
@@fafnirymd circular can send any monster it doesn't have to be sigma
+ you have so many ways to circular even if you don't open
final sigma is for otk only you summon it when your opponent has a 2000 atk or less or when you have substraction in your hand it's safer than accessess code
it's uneffected and it comes up so many times
you need more than one sigma cuz you have to link it away sometimes and it will get banished
sense you're not playing final sigma I don't see why would you play nabla and multiplication
@@royalgames6090 as I said nabla is for an extender in case circular search effect is negated..